Overall Budget is less than distributed budget

Hi ,
I am getting a error that " Overall Budget is less than distributed Budget" while returning the budget amount.
I am trying to return the distributable amount . I feel the distributable amount is not utilised.
Thanks
Dasa

Hi,
If u r facing this problem from internal orders - use report KO31
If u r facing this problem from WBS Element - use report cjbn
it will adjust the incosistancy in tables ....
Still if u r not resolved please let us know ...
all the best
Prasad

Similar Messages

Overall budget less than overall release with CJ35

Hi
When I retrun amount from Project through CJ35 system gives me following error:
"Overall budget less than overall release"
Any other steps requires before Returning Budget?
Regards
Sujit

I sense that the overall budget is distributed over a time frame of more than 1 year.
Part of the budget was released for the current year... and some of it was consumed.
Now you wish to return the surplus.
2 cases here.
Return in the project (not the cause of error msg that you are getting) and
Return from the project.
Here in second case when you do the CJ52 Transaction on the distributable budget, the system updates the returns within the project, meaning that the total budget is reduced accordingly.
Kindly refer this link below. Hope this info helps
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60/helpdata/en/86/98853478616434e10000009b38f83b/frameset.htm
Regards,
Pradyumna

Overall budget less than cumulative budget

Hi,
I have try to return the budget amount in im52, im38 but i am receiving the error message like
Message no. BQ155
Diagnosis
The overall budget        14,678,166.00 GBP in operative element NATIONS
& REGIONS - ENGLAND is less than the accumulated budget
98,388,500.00 GBP.
The accumulated budget is the total of the annual budgets.
Please help us to solve the above issue with steps.
With regards,
v.k

Hi,
Thanks for your reply. I am receiving same error as mention above. CJ 30
Budget amount 1325100
current budget 1325100
Distributed      1294917
Distributable     30883.
But when go to im 38 or im 52 before doing any transaction if do checking i am error message is like above .
At Project level
Current budget 1325100
Distributed      1294917
Distributable     30883
At Position Id Level
Current budget 14,678,166
Distributed        14,678,166
Distributable       nil
Cumulative      98,388,500
Remainder     -83,710,334
Carry forward 22,081,288
There problem is at Possition ID level. There is mis match between Current budget and Cumulative.
I have applied sap note 1230375 also.
Kindly do the needful.
Thanks.
With regards,
V.K

Total budget 0.00 EUR in order 12412100 is less than the cumulative bud

Dear Sir,
In t.code KO22 it gives error while saving amount in original budget field for 2008,
"The total budget 0.00 EUR in order 15210080 is less than the cumulative budget 2.16 EUR.
The cumulative budget is the total of the annual budgets."
Can you pls guide.
Thanks
Edited by: Mukherjee S on Mar 31, 2008 1:47 PM

You might have distirbuted the values (2.16 EUR) over years. In this case you need to enter the value in Overall Budget also.
Regards
Sreenivas

Budget control - Assigned funds are less than payment budget for fiscal year in document item

Dear Experts,
We are using Former budgeting, when ever we run the transaction FMBV getting the following message to a particular user.
Budgeting
Assigned funds are xxxx BHD less than payment budget for fiscal year
2014 in document item XXXX /XXXXX .
And also when purchasing creates the PO getting similar message to a particular user.
Purchase order 450000XXXX
Assigned funds are XXXX BHD less than the commitment budget for
fiscal year 2014 in document item 010 XXXX /XXXXX .
How to know where these users were maintained.
Thanks for the help

Hello Itai,
Sorry for my late reply. Have you been able to find a solution for this?
If not, please update, otherwise please make this thread as answered.
Sorry for the delay...
Kind regards, Mar.

POs value exceeding overall budget in WBS

Hello
I'm an auditor in a multinational company that uses SAP. I have came upon a case in which the overal budget for a WBS is 100,000 and the total value of the POs opened against this WBS is around 140,000. Invoices recorded against these POs are less than 100,000. I have checked in the WBS and saw that the budget control for it is activated.
I'm trying to understand what happened but I can't as of now.
Can someone help me?
Thanks a lot in advance

Goodmorning
can you please tell me how to see the tolerance levels set in AVAC?
As far as invoices and deliveries is concenrned I have checked and I have seen that they have only received and been invoiced with part of the quantitied order and not for everything. More specifically the overall budget of the WBS is 100,000 and they have raised 4 POs against this WBS with total value of 151,0000. They have only received u20AC 74,000 and for the rest I have seen that they haven't received anything.
The overdelivery tolerance set at the PO level is 5%.
Thanks a lot in advance

Replacing Overall Budget values with Assigned budget values.

Hello Experts,
My planned overall budget was 16 crore and assigned budget is 15 crore in project header comprising of some -ve available budget against some child level wbs.
Now, against some project i used CJ30 and replaced the amount but some projects are not allowing me to do the same.
In those projects against few child wbs budget is -ve and at parent wbs its +ve available budget.
When I am doing replacement for this parent wbs system is not allowing.
Please suggest.
Thanks & Regards,
saurabh

Experts,
Once the budget is Distributed, is it possible to decrease the value of distributed budget.?
i am trying but in vain..
please help.
thanks
ankur

In less than 2 weeks, I had a panic attack on my Macbook 10.6.8. What does this mean?

In less than 2 weeks, my macbook 10.6.8 had a panic attack. Shortly before it happened 2 weeks ago, I got this call from someone saying he was from Apple and he got a report that something was wrong with my computer. Since I hadn't called any one I thought it was a prank call and I hung up. Shortly after that I received the message to power down my computer. Do people from Apple make calls like this? I tried to find the number but I think it one of those caller unavailable, that's why I hung up. What could be causing this panic attack? Since 2007, it's happened before but few and far between. I did add new memory about a month ago but other than that, I've added nothing. I hope you can help me because I am on very limited budget and can't buy a new one. Thanks for your help.

The call as well as any similar email messages claiming to be from Apple are all phishing scams. We can't help you until you post a kernel panic log: Mac OS X- How to log a kernel panic. Visit The XLab FAQs and read the FAQ on diagnosing kernel panics.

Suggest Camcorder less than $500, prefer not tape

Pardon the awkwardly worded headline.
Do I still need a tape camera to edit with FCP Express?
Would prefer not. Regardless, suggestions of a good camcorder for less than $500 greatly appreciated. Shooting mostly family stuff. Don't know if I can accomodate the extra disk space required by HD.
Thanks for any guidance.

"Do I still need a tape camera to edit with FCP Express?"
No.
" suggestions of a good camcorder for less than $500"
Any standard AVCHD Video Camera will do the job using FCE > Log & Transfer.
Cameras are personal and features are important such as headphone socket, external mic input and an OIS (optical image stabilizer).
You need to test drive cameras in your buget zone to try how they fit into your hand and where buttons are located etc.
3 sensor chips are important to boost the image quality as is the quality of the lens, usually found in the higher end camcorders.
Second hand solid state cameras may put a high end cam into the budget. They have hardly any moving parts as compared the old tape cameras and thus second hand solid state cams are a safer purchase second hand than tape cams.
As far as HD space you should get yourself an external fast drive eg. firewire, thunderbolt or USB 3 for media storage. As big as you can afford.
Nowdays that's about a 1Terabyte or so.
HD video when absorbed to FCE will use around 40 gig per hour and the render files during editing will keep the gigs climbing.
Al

Problems with the Fios 20/5 connection speed in my area dropping down to less than 3mbs.

I have written out a flyer that I plan to go door to door with. Since I am under contract with Verizon, I am forced to honor my side of the contract. Even if they are allowed to make me pay for a service that I am not completely getting. I am very displeased and as soon as my contract is up, I will change back to My local cable companies all in one that does not require a contract and has no issue such as the one I am having.
Do you have Verizon Fios Internet?
Are you on the 20/5 connection?
If so, you may not be getting the speed you are paying for. I am on a 20/5 connection and when my computer is on for longer than an hour the internet download speed with Verizon Fios starts to slow down until it is below 3mbs. It takes about 24 hours to get down to 3mbs but only about an hour or two to get down to about 6-7mbs when I am paying for 20mbs…
I have 3 computers in my home that have Windows Vista, Windows XP home edition and Windows Media Edition 2005. All of the computers run into this same exact issue, I have tried every setting I could think of with my 24 years of computer technical experience. I finally took one machine with Windows XP and ran a full format on the hard drive and reinstalled a fresh Windows Xp Operating system onto the hard drive so it is a bare bones OS. This way there is no other software on the machine that could possibly be causing the problem and found that when I connected online through Verizon Fios the machine still ran into the same exact issue. This proves to me that the issue is not on any of my machines.
Now all of this time my buddy that lives 1.2 miles away from my house has been having the same issue with three computers at his home also. He has Windows Vista on two machines and Windows XP Pro on one.
When I concluded that it was a Verizon Fios issue, after a few months of trying to get by, researching, diagnosing and losing much information in order to verify it was on Verizon’s side, I contacted technical support at Verizon’s online website. The agent and I went through the regular procedure that anyone would have to go through and I patiently explained what I had done to try to diagnose the issue. The agent came to the conclusion that he could not figure out the problem so he guessed that the Verizon router/modem may be the issue and told me he would send me a new one by mail.
I received the new Verizon router/modem, installed it and had to call to have it activated. Afterward it still had the same exact issue as the prior router/modem. So now we know it’s not my computers, it’s not the router/modem. My Verizon router/modem is connected right at the Optical Network Terminal (ONT), which is the box that connects the fiber-optics to your home, usually just inside or outside your garage wall. Mine is just outside…
From here my buddy, who has been having this problem also the entire time, called the local office of Verizon Fios and an installer was setup to come over to his home and trouble shoot the issue. My buddy called me and told me when the installer was headed to his home and I met him at his home to see what the installer found and in hope that my issue would be fixed at the same time. The installer went through the system at his house and was frustrated about not finding the reason for the issue and ready to leave without fixing anything. I simply asked that he stay long enough to see the issue present itself within an hour-hour and a half.
His laptop itself already showed the speed drop from 20mbs to between 16-17mbs, it was on its way down. He basically told us something that online tech support already stated to me, it is extremely difficult to prove it is on Verizon’s side. In other words it is extremely difficult to prove it, in a way that will convince Verizon to check its own servers, routers and software updates to their own systems. The installer, good guy, couldn’t/wouldn’t stay but we did convince him not to simply drop the issue. He called shop and they sent another installer out to take over the issue.
The new installer, great guy, got up to speed on what was already done at my buddies home. The first installer, checked and replaced the Verizon router/modem, checked the wiring and splitters. Basically went through the entire system up to the Optical Network Terminal (ONT), the box that connects the fiber-optics to your home. He pulled and replaced the Optical Network Terminal (ONT), thinking that perhaps the unit was compromised. While he was doing this job a tech was called and asked to stop by for assistance with the issue. The tech checked the computers inside and tried to do some settings that the main office informed him to try. I explained to the tech that the same issue was happening at my house, that I went through every setting I could think of and find online to help alleviate the issue. After some shop talk about what I had tried, including the full format and reinstall of the operating system on one of my machines, he just as I came to the conclusion that it couldn’t be with the computers and since everything that had to do with the Verizon Fios system from the street to the end-user computer had been checked, verified and/or replaced, the issue had to be coming from Verizon’s main office.
The installer had already checked the main at the road that has the 3x2 green service cover on it by the side walk. Everything was in good working order. The tech called the main office to see if my buddy and I were on the same hub, basically a big splitter that continues the service from the main office to the homes, we were not. So that was ruled out…
My understanding of the system ends there. The only other components I know of are the Main branch’s routers, servers and software.
Verizon had a new connection speed added to their system, 25/15 about the same time our issue began. So I am guessing that when they updated the system to include this new connection speed they corrupted the software for the 20/5 connection.
We have been waiting to hear from the tech that was at my buddy’s house, to see if the issue will be dealt with. My buddy has called him a couple of times and he has mentioned that he is trying to get it addressed and to call back if we hadn’t heard from him. He remembered who he and I were and what the issue was, so I believe he is taking it seriously. How far he can move the issue is beyond me…
I want to add that my buddy and I have been customers with the all in one package from Verizon Fios since their services have moved into our area, about a year and a half… It has only been since about June that this issue has presented itself, before then we were on 7th heaven with the speeds. We couldn’t have been more than happy with the services.
This issue has caused that to all go afoul, not only do the speeds get down to less than 3mbs but the speed is not smooth at all. Rather the 3mbs speed is stop and go, freezing in between at times, very choppy. Barely usable at times, unless you restart the computers and start over.
We are hoping that anyone with Verizon Fios Internet Services will keep an eye on their speeds by going to http://speedtest.net and doing tests to verify they are getting the speeds they are paying Verizon for.
This is what it will take for Verizon to take this issue seriously is to gather everyone on the system that may be having the same issue. I believe it is everyone that is within the 1.2 miles from my house to my buddy’s and will distribute flyers to each and every house in between.
If you find that your speed is not as fast as it should be please contact me and I will add you to the list, this way we can see exactly how far this problem covers and perhaps it will also help to show a pattern and understanding as to why the issue is present in the first place.
My contact information,
I have left this out here, you can contact me on these forums...

Actually what this came down to was an issue between Windows Vista and an Ethernet Card on one of the machines in each of our local networks.
Even though our two machines are 6 years apart, we both have the same ethernet adapter on our main desktops. A RealTek RTL8139/810x Family Fast Ethernet Nic. It seems that the adapter does not work at the 20mbs download speeds with Vista. For some reason the adapter does not shut down when the computer does? I don't understand why but it doesn't, it keeps the connection alive. I removed the ethernet cable and pulled the power cable and had my two other computers still connected to the network and found that the issue was resolved. The way I found out was that I used the connections on my main computer to hook up one I had laying around and through further testing found the problem no longer existed...
Then I realized that my buddy and I installed Windows Vista at about the same time, a couple of months ago. Funny how you can forget an important detail like that. Then I remembered that he had the same identical ethernet adapter as I did, I had noticed that while trouble shooting his computer at his home but didn't think it was important at the time. Until the issue was narrowed down to the adapter, then it all seemed to all fall into line.
Quite humbling... In the end, anyone who has Windows Vista and this NIC probably will have problems with the 20mbs download speed of the computers on their own networks. I tried the latest Vista driver from RealTek and also tried to roll back the driver, with no success....
Back at the beginning when we first had fios installed in our homes there wasn't an issue when we had the 10/2 speeds and had Vista. Then we decided to change from Vista to XP because we both were having issues as to what programs you could use and which you could not, shortly after having fios installed. Then when verizon upgraded us to 20/5 we were amazed at the speed and still had no issue because we had XP on our main computers with the RealTek adapters...
We reinstalled Vista because it seemed like we were having more issues with XP by getting hit with Antivirus2008 and its variants and thought it time for a change back...
It didn't really hit us that Vista could be the culprit because we both have a laptop in our networks that have had Vista on them from the get go when there were no issues... We also didn't notice just how bad it was right away and over time kind of left the Vista install out of the equation.
Just strange that one computer can effect all the other computers on the network, even when it is shut down...
I allowed the other two computers to run 24hours and the issue did not present itself, when I added the main computer with the RealTek adapter back to the mix it reappeared. The Realtek adapter is the only real common denominator between his machine and mine.
So now we have three choices,
We can go back to Windows XP.
We can buy a new NIC or a wireless card to replace the RealTek...
Hopefully this post will help anyone else who runs into this problem, it has been very frustrating to say the least...
Thanks to everyone for their help and I apologize for complaining about verizon when it was not a verizon issue. I came to the conclusion that the only part verizon really played was upgrading us to a 20/5 tier which I am thankful for...
Would be nice if this card was on a list that Verizon support could use to troubleshoot , diagnose or eliminate for future support issues.
Message Edited by keiser0619 on 08-06-2009 03:58 PM

I have i phone 4 brand new but the battery if i make it fully charge its take less than one day ? Why ?, I have i phone 4 brand new but the battery if i make it fully charge its take less than one day ? Why ?

I have i phone 4 brand new but the battery if i make it fully charge its take less than one day ? Why ?, I have i phone 4 brand new but the battery if i make it fully charge its take less than one day ? Why ?

Depends on usage, your cellular reception overall, and various settings during that time.

When I go to Preview to view a photo it shows up for less than a second then disappears and just leaves a gray box where the photo should be. iMac (Retina 5K, 27-inch, Late 2014). I need Preview for work.

After the OS X Yosemite 10.10.3 update When I go to use Preview to view a photo it shows up for less than a second then disappears and just leaves a gray box where the photo should be. iMac (Retina 5K, 27-inch, Late 2014). I need Preview for work.

1. This procedure is a diagnostic test. It changes nothing, for better or worse, and therefore will not, in itself, solve the problem. But with the aid of the test results, the solution may take a few minutes, instead of hours or days.
The test works on OS X 10.7 ("Lion") and later. I don't recommend running it on older versions of OS X. It will do no harm, but it won't do much good either.
Don't be put off by the complexity of these instructions. The process is much less complicated than the description. You do harder tasks with the computer all the time.
2. If you don't already have a current backup, back up all data before doing anything else. The backup is necessary on general principle, not because of anything in the test procedure. Backup is always a must, and when you're having any kind of trouble with the computer, you may be at higher than usual risk of losing data, whether you follow these instructions or not.
There are ways to back up a computer that isn't fully functional. Ask if you need guidance.
3. Below are instructions to run a UNIX shell script, a type of program. As I wrote above, it changes nothing. It doesn't send or receive any data on the network. All it does is to generate a human-readable report on the state of the computer. That report goes nowhere unless you choose to share it. If you prefer, you can act on it yourself without disclosing the contents to me or anyone else.
You should be wondering whether you can believe me, and whether it's safe to run a program at the behest of a stranger. In general, no, it's not safe and I don't encourage it.
In this case, however, there are a couple of ways for you to decide whether the program is safe without having to trust me. First, you can read it. Unlike an application that you download and click to run, it's transparent, so anyone with the necessary skill can verify what it does.
You may not be able to understand the script yourself. But variations of it have been posted on this website thousands of times over a period of years. The site is hosted by Apple, which does not allow it to be used to distribute harmful software. Any one of the millions of registered users could have read the script and raised the alarm if it was harmful. Then I would not be here now and you would not be reading this message. See, for example, this discussion.
Nevertheless, if you can't satisfy yourself that these instructions are safe, don't follow them. Ask for other options.
4. Here's a general summary of what you need to do, if you choose to proceed:
☞ Copy a particular line of text to the Clipboard.
☞ Paste into the window of another application.
☞ Wait for the test to run. It usually takes a few minutes.
☞ Paste the results, which will have been copied automatically, back into a reply on this page.
These are not specific instructions; just an overview. The details are in parts 7 and 8 of this comment. The sequence is: copy, paste, wait, paste again. You don't need to copy a second time.
5. Try to test under conditions that reproduce the problem, as far as possible. For example, if the computer is sometimes, but not always, slow, run the test during a slowdown.
You may have started up in "safe" mode. If the system is now in safe mode and works well enough in normal mode to run the test, restart as usual. If you can only test in safe mode, do that.
6. If you have more than one user, and the one affected by the problem is not an administrator, then please run the test twice: once while logged in as the affected user, and once as an administrator. The results may be different. The user that is created automatically on a new computer when you start it for the first time is an administrator. If you can't log in as an administrator, test as the affected user. Most personal Macs have only one user, and in that case this section doesn’t apply. Don't log in as root.
7. Load this linked web page (on the website "Pastebin.") The title of the page is "Diagnostic Test." Below the title is a text box headed by three small icons. The one on the right represents a clipboard. Click that icon to select the text, then copy it to the Clipboard on your computer by pressing the key combination command-C.
If the text doesn't highlight when you click the icon, select it by triple-clicking anywhere inside the box. Don't select the whole page, just the text in the box.
8. Launch the built-in Terminal application in any of the following ways:
☞ Enter the first few letters of its name into a Spotlight search. Select it in the results (it should be at the top.)
☞ In the Finder, select Go ▹ Utilities from the menu bar, or press the key combination shift-command-U. The application is in the folder that opens.
☞ Open LaunchPad and start typing the name.
Click anywhere in the Terminal window to activate it. Paste from the Clipboard into the window by pressing command-V, then press return. The text you pasted should vanish immediately.
9. If you see an error message in the Terminal window such as "Syntax error" or "Event not found," enter
exec bash
and press return. Then paste the script again.
10. If you're logged in as an administrator, you'll be prompted for your login password. Nothing will be displayed when you type it. You will not see the usual dots in place of typed characters. Make sure caps lock is off. Type carefully and then press return. You may get a one-time warning to be careful. If you make three failed attempts to enter the password, the test will run anyway, but it will produce less information. If you don't know the password, or if you prefer not to enter it, just press return three times at the password prompt. Again, the script will still run.
If you're not logged in as an administrator, you won't be prompted for a password. The test will still run. It just won't do anything that requires administrator privileges.
11. The test may take a few minutes to run, depending on how many files you have and the speed of the computer. A computer that's abnormally slow may take longer to run the test. While it's running, a series of lines will appear in the Terminal window like this:
[Process started]
        Part 1 of 8 done at … sec
        Part 8 of 8 done at … sec
        The test results are on the Clipboard.
        Please close this window.
[Process completed]
The intervals between parts won't be exactly equal, but they give a rough indication of progress. The total number of parts may be different from what's shown here.
Wait for the final message "Process completed" to appear. If you don't see it within about ten minutes, the test probably won't complete in a reasonable time. In that case, press the key combination control-C or command-period to stop it and go to the next step. You'll have incomplete results, but still something.
12. When the test is complete, or if you stopped it because it was taking too long, quit Terminal. The results will have been copied to the Clipboard automatically. They are not shown in the Terminal window. Please don't copy anything from there. All you have to do is start a reply to this comment and then paste by pressing command-V again.
At the top of the results, there will be a line that begins with the words "Start time." If you don't see that, but instead see a mass of gibberish, you didn't wait for the "Process completed" message to appear in the Terminal window. Please wait for it and try again.
If any private information, such as your name or email address, appears in the results, anonymize it before posting. Usually that won't be necessary.
13. When you post the results, you might see an error message on the web page: "You have included content in your post that is not permitted," or "You are not authorized to post." That's a bug in the forum software. Please post the test results on Pastebin, then post a link here to the page you created.
14. This is a public forum, and others may give you advice based on the results of the test. They speak for themselves, not for me. The test itself is harmless, but whatever else you're told to do may not be. For others who choose to run it, I don't recommend that you post the test results on this website unless I asked you to.
Copyright © 2014, 2015 by Linc Davis. As the sole author of this work (including the referenced "Diagnostic Test"), I reserve all rights to it except as provided in the Use Agreement for the Apple Support Communities website ("ASC"). Readers of ASC may copy it for their own personal use. Neither the whole nor any part may be redistributed.

ERROR: PGI in delivery with picked quantity less than delivery quantity

Hi Friends!
I need your help, i have the following situation:
Outbound Delivery with batch position:
90001 Mat DD3450 Picked Delivery Quantity=98 and Picked quantity=84
Overall Pick Status = "B"
Overall WM Status = "C"
The outbound delivery was posted completely and the following documents was generated:
WMS transfer order: With 84 UN in quantity
Material document: With 98 UN in quantity
Invoice: With 98 UN billed
The question is how was posible to generated the PGI for the outbound delivery when the picked quantity was less than delivery quantity? is a SAP program error?
Thanks
Best regards
Enrique

benito,
Check your Picking Confirmation config. as you are using WM/Lean WM, then your Shipping Point should have a mandatory requirement to confirm all TO's. The confirmation should update the Picking Status and the Overall GI Status to 'C' (with any relevant changes to the picked qty). Give that a go.
Cheers,
Paul...

Using the management console in less-than-ideal network topologies

I'm interested in using the JRockit management console for investigating
performance issues happening on customer sites. However, the management
console's method of communication with the server doesn't appear to be
very tolerant of tunneled connections (which would be the most
straightforward approach), on account of the management client starting
a new connection with an address and port provided by the server --
which is likely not to be an address and port which, from the client's
location, will actually reach the server.
Even if I were to start a non-tunneled connection from our VPN host
(which is less than ideal, as this system is headless), it would fail on
account of being given the server's primary address rather than its VPN
address. Setting jrockit.management.address at application server
startup isn't an acceptable solution as we may be starting the JVM
before the VPN connection has negotiated an IP, and restarting the
application server every time the VPN resets is an entirely unacceptable
approach.
If anyone could suggest a workaround, it would be appreciated.
Putting a rework of the management console's connection method on the
TODO list such that some future version of JRockit doesn't have this
issue would be a Good Thing as well -- particularly were it to occur
before IPv6 becomes widely deployed enough to make the issue moot.

I got my first MB about a year ago. Since this is your first MB, I'd suggest that you "play" with it first to get used to it.
After consulting this forum (and since my MB was after all brand new with no important files to backup), I did a "fresh" install from the installation DVD that comes with the MB (instead of deleting unwanted files). You do this by putting the DVD in your MB, restarting it and holding the C key.
I can't remember the detailed installation instructions, but they were quite simple and straightforward, and I just followed them as they appeared on the screen.
I do remember that I opted for the "erase and install" option which completely erases the destination volume and then installs a new copy of Mac OS X on the MB. There is also an option where you can select which programs you want to install (so that you can free up hard disk space).
After installing Mac OS X, you'll have to configure all of your computer settings (just follow the instructions on the screen), install iLife applications (which are provided on a DVD with a new MB) and other 3rd party applications you might be interested in (some of which can be downloaded for free from the internet).
While you won't be using Office for Mac, you may want to try Neo Office (just google for it). It's free although donations are appreciated.
Last but not least, my MB has been trouble free and my overall experience has been very good.
I hope this helps and enjoy your new MB.

The initial heap size must be less than or equal to the maximum heap size.

All,
Please help!!
I have tested my Application Client Project in WSAD on my pc and it works fine.
I have 1gb RAM on my pc. When I deploy the same app on another xp pc(same as mine but 512mb RAM) I get a heap size error. Here is the exact error:
Incompatible initial and maximum heap sizes specified:
initial size: 268435456 bytes, maximum heap size: 267380736 bytes
The initial heap size must be less than or equal to the maximum heap size.
The default initial and maximum heap sizes are 4194304 and 267380736 bytes.
Usage: java [-options] class [args...]
(to execute a class)
or java -jar [-options] jarfile [args...]
(to execute a jar file)
where options include:
-cp -classpath <directories and zip/jar files separated by ;>
set search path for application classes and resources
-D<name>=<value>
set a system property
-verbose[:class|gc|jni]
enable verbose output
-version print product version
-showversion print product version and continue
-? -help print this help message
-X print help on non-standard options
Could not create the Java virtual machine.
Press any key to continue . . .
Here is the batch file that runs my app:
@echo off
SET appClientEar=C:\corp\apps\mts\jars\MTSClientEAR.ear
set JVM_ARGS=-Xms256M -Xmx256M
set CLIENT_PROPS=C:\corp\apps\mts\jars\medicalclient.properties
set APP_ARGS=
call C:\bnsf\IBM\WebSphere\AppClient\bin\launchClientBNSF.bat "%JVM_ARGS%" %appClientEar% "-CCpropfile=%CLIENT_PROPS%" %APP_ARGS%
@pause
I have changed the value of Xms and Xmx of JVM_ARGS to different size but I sitll get error. Anyone knows what the problem is. Thanks..

Don't know why, but the "maximum heap size: 267380736 bytes" value is just slightly less than 256*1024*1024, wheras the reported initial size is equal to that.
Try setting the initial value to 255MB.

Overall Budget is less than distributed budget

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for