P2P scenerio

Hi All,
I am trying to create delivery for a STO . The delivery date in STO is 24.11.2010 .
When i am trying to create delivery in VL10d , system is not selecting the purchase order at all .
Is the past delivery date in STO is the issue ? How to solve this issue as it is mandatory to create delivery for this STO for buisness.
Thnaks
Rohit

Hello ,
There is no error . I insert the PO number on the selection screen and execute . I do not get this PO number in the output to create delivery from the same.
The shipping tab is also available.
Regards
Rohit

Similar Messages

Not getting attribute values in IPC routines Scenerio R/3 B2B using AP 7.0

Hi,
Our Scenerio is using ISA R/3 B2B using AP 7.0. I have developed IPC routines but when i debug my routines in SM53 I notice that I'm not getting any attribute value except for VKORG.
I'm pasting the code below. Please help me if I have to implement some BADI or do something more to get the attribute values.
I have defined the attributes properly in Routine assignment in tcode /n/sapcnd/ueass
userexitlogger.writeLogDebug("*requirment 901*" + "Plant = "plant"||ANZ_MONATE ="+ item.getAttributeValue(ANZ_MONATE_STR).toString()"||ANZ_JAHRE="item.getAttributeValue(ANZ_JAHRE_STR).toString()"||MATKL="item.getAttributeValue(MATKL_STR).toString()"||PSTYV="item.getAttributeValue(PSTYV_STR).toString()"||VKORG="item.getAttributeValue(VKORG_STR)"||PRSFD="item.getAttributeValue(PRSFD_STR)"||MVGR2="item.getAttributeValue(MVGR2_STR).toString()"||PRSDT="item.getAttributeValue(PRSDT_STR).toString()"||AUDAT="item.getAttributeValue(AUDAT_STR).toString());
I would reward points for help
Many Thanks n regards,
Dipender

I would like to go through each Value of the xml file and give each Value a name
e.g. from the xml file <VentCount Value=1> Retreive the value above and giving it the name VentCount. Then I would beable to use the name vent count as follows:
setVentCount() //My own method can use as follows: setVentCount(VentCount); I would like to do his for ever value, each value with a specific name

Jabber not support p2p audio on WebEx Connect.

Hi, everyone.
We have received complaints from customers in the WebEx Connect Client peer-to-peer audio functionality. We know Cisco's announcement, after April 3, 2015, a customer has to use Jabber on WebEx Connect. But Jabber doesn't have the peer to peer audio function.
Customers to be continued use the WebEx Connect Client. Until Jabber with peer-to-peer audio functionality. I think customer claims is hot, and correct.
Q1. Does Jabber plan to support the peer to peer audio function?
Q2. We want to use continuous WebEx Connect Client, until p2p audio support on Jabber.
We escalated to the Webex Customer success Manager, but difficult to change the situation. If this goes on, customers consider stopping the WebEx contract renewal. and considering Skype or LINE for free talk function :(
regards,
Kazuki Nakagawa @ Hitachi (HIENG) Japan.

Haven't been able to try a different speaker yet, but I can add that
- I successfully used bluetooth with a car phone about a year ago
- I have tried an iphone 5 with my soundbar, with same choppy/intermittent sound.
- However, it works perfectly when I stream from my computer using bluetooth.
Also, I have been in touch with Philips customer care, but I'm inclined to thinking the phone is the source of the problem... (Or, most likely, I am to blame..)

Wrt54gs loses internet connection when using P2P Ares

I have a wrt54gs v5 and I've installed the latest firmware and reset back to factory then reconfigured. Whenever Ares is started all other computers (wired or wireless) lose their inet connection. Within 2-5 minutes of stopping Ares everything starts working again. I've checked Ares and it's set to am max of 10 connections.
I've hooked up my old befsx41 and it works fine but I need the wireless. Both of these are talking to a befcmu10 cable modem. I've never had problems with linksys before but from what I'm seeing on the forums the wrt54xxx doesn't seem to be of the same quality as the oldser stuff. Anyone know of any specific versions that fix this?
(Mod Note: Edited for guideline compliance. Thanks!)
Message Edited by Maximus on 07-04-2007 02:13 PM

Since your BEF works with P2P, why don't you simply convert your WRT into a WAP (wireless access point). This way you will use the wireless of the WRT, while using the BEF to handle all the routing chores.
To do this, setup the BEF as your primary router.
Then wire one computer to port 1 (not the Internet port) on the WRT. (Note: Disconnect everything else from the WRT at this time.)
Then in the WRT do the following:
Turn off the DHCP server.
Set the "Local IP address" to 192.168.1.2 (assuming no other device on your network is using this fixed LAN IP address, and assuming the BEF is set to use the 192.168.1.x address space.)
Save your settings. Power down the WRT.
Next, connect any numbered port on the WRT to any numbered port on the BEF. Do not connect anything to the Internet port on the WRT.
The BEF will control your router settings (DHCP server, port forwarding, etc.)
The WRT will control your wireless settings.
Please let me know whether this setup allows your P2P to work properly.

Report a bug, if this problem is not solved, p2p of rtmfp will not be of much use

Recently, we have several clients on a p2p application, but we use the development version to test, two-way voice and video connection is not successful, several customers of the network environment is as follows:
First of all, there is no firewall;
These networks have in common is:
After an optical access, the subnet with a lot of routers, one by one, and some series, some parallel, some in series and then parallel, and some in parallel then in series, in short, they can be online, and then not the same segment of the computer, p2p connection is not successful, and other computer connection is not successful, and some also use the vpn.
Analogy: 192.168.5.10 and 192.168.10.10 to connect not, 192.168.5.10 and 192.168.5.11 is ok, is 192.168.5.10 may be outside the network of other computers can connect to, but 192.168.10.10 possible and other computers outside the network connections are not.
Hope you solve this problem as soon as possible, because rtmfp too expensive, otherwise p2p applications, are generally large companies (schools, government) affordable, and their networks are very complex, they do not take, you will no client .
My English is not very good, google translation
I gave you a bug report so long, how did not care for me ah;
This forum nobody, or you did not test this bug, you do not have time to correct this bug;
Either we modify not the flash player platform to the bottom of things, I will not give you advice.
In fact, standing on a technical point of view to think that I have is to use a socket network communication can be OK, network barrier, it is not.
But would like the user's perspective, I can be normal to the Internet, other p2p communications software, I can, on this thing, impossible, it is this software not work, so that this bug is that we must solve the .
I am very concerned about this issue every day and came to see nobody replies, I think this problem, I think, to solve this problem, you can proceed in two ways:
1.dns
I think it may be able to solve this problem, dynamic dns,
The idea is: to allow users to connect to the server, the user computer first upd listener (that is, iis services), then farid + domain to form a secondary domain name server dynamically to resolve the domain name to the user's computer, in a timely manner to refresh dns.
In this way, the user's computer, there is a fixed identity.
2 gateway
From users within the LAN to solve this problem, it can only proceed from the gateway.
For example, to use arp and other means to get to the router, where each segment ip then ip, similar to the route command to specify more than one gateway to the user's computer may be able to solve this problem.
In theory, these two methods may be feasible.
We also expect a new solution, I do not know Daoxing not
Speak before this program, take a look at our test for RTMFP p2p network topology, and the test results (explain, test, do not open the firewall and router are not set up static routing).
Computer A, computer B - "router A -" server S
The above NetConnection.Connect.Success 95% NetStream.Connect.Success 5% NetStream.Connect.Fail
Computer A - "Router A - servers S" - routers B - Computer B
Above, NetConnection.Connect.Success, NetStream.Connect.Success
Computer A - "Router A - servers S" - router B - routers C - Computer B
Above, NetConnection.Connect.Success, 50% NetStream.Connect.Success 50% NetStream.Connect.Fail
(Computer A - Router A, computer B) - router B - server S
Above NetConnection.Connect.Success, 100% NetStream.Connect.Fail
Computer A - "Router A -" router B - server S "- Router C" - router D "- computer B
Above NetConnection.Connect.Success, 100% NetStream.Connect.Fail
Computer A - "Router A -" Router B - "Router C -" server S "- Router D" - Router E "- computer B
Above NetConnection.Connect.Success, 100% NetStream.Connect.Fail
See the above test results, is not very bad, the key is FMS4.5 sell 450,000 RMB in China, their own software does not do a good job, but also to sell such a high price in China, a man named QQ. The above test environment, all 100% NetConnection.Connect.Success 100% NetStream.Connect.Success, free, QQ has more than 100 million users, QQ companies rely on advertising to make money game.
Seems to digress, huh, huh.
The test results, 100% NetConnection.Connect.Success, and NetStream.Connect.Fail the main reason is because the route connected in series or more than two or two and then caused.
From a technical perspective, as a packet travels through a number of the NAT router default all packets can be out, new packets can not be into the second layer of the router caused.
Find the reason, we think of a countermeasure to solve this problem from the software itself.
The last case of the above test environment, for example:
When computer A and server S NetConnection.Connect.Success computer B with the server the S NetConnection.Connect.Success, computer A to Router D sends an upd packets, not because the router can only broadcast the data packet to computer B, so 100 % NetStream.Connect.Fail.
The 100% NetConnection.Connect.Success, if we can NetStream.Connect, and NetConnection.Connect connected together, is not can be 100% NetStream.Connect.Success?
In other words, no matter what circumstances, computer A and computer B can and server S connection is successful, the other way round, that is, the server S and the Computer A or Computer B can connect.
We can not let the computer A or computer B, pretending to server S (In theory, called NAT, technically speaking, is to modify the source ip of the packet header and source Mac server S, and parity), the router not in the NAT, and other communications.

Hi Mr. Wog,
My guess is that once you see an estimate for replacement for hundreds of dollars, those scratches won't look too bad anymore. There are products to cover the outer casing, and some people put stickers on, or even paint (I don't recommend either, but ymmv). Good luck.

Specific Identification Cost for batch managed items (Follow-Up from P2P)

Specific Identification Cost method is used for serial and batch managed item. Using this method, the outbound cost of such items would be the original cost of specific goods, which can be determined according to the serial or batch number of that item.
Business One allows the user to receive batch managed items with a batch number that already exists in the DB. Its possible that the received quantity is added to on-hand quantity in the warehouse. In such case, the quantity on-hand of that batch and the received quantity may have different costs.
What should be the system behavior in such case:
1. Block receipts to the same batch with different costs.
2. Write the difference to a price difference account, as done in Standard Cost method.
3. Manage the batch cost with Moving Average method.
This thread is continuation from 'Specific Identification Cost for batch managed Items' <a href="http://p2p.sap.com/businessoneforum?type=join&login=1&uid=41FB661A76CED536C825C4E2B6FF4397&cid=91&go=z37225">discussion</a> in P2P SAP Business One Forum (Product Development Collaboration).
Previous discussion on P2P is summarized in the attached file.

Hi Peter,
This is a very important functionality that you are describing here. For example, in the Steel industry, it could be extremely useful to cost by batch or serial number.
If you receive a batch that already exists in the system and if the costing method for the product is moving average, then teh cost of the batch should be calculated based on the moving average as well.
If the costing method is standard, then the cost should go in a variance account.
If the costing method is FIFO, then it is a getting trickier...
Regards,
Vincent

Key Reports for Customers (Follow-Up from P2P)

Currently, we are working intensively on enhancing the reporting area in B1 and XL Reporter. Our ambition is to reach a situation where most of the required reports will be installed automatically. We would like to know your opinion about your preferences and our directions.
This thread is continuation from 'Key Reports for Customers' <a href="http://p2p.sap.com/businessoneforum?type=join&login=1&uid=41FB661A76CED536C825C4E2B6FF4397&cid=91&go=z37225">discussion</a> in P2P SAP Business One Forum (Product Development Collaboration). Previous discussion on P2P is summarized in the attached file.

Key reports not readily available at present for customers with multiple locations are sales by branch, purchases by branch, open orders by branch (sales and purchases), the ability to group sales persons by branch for reporting by salesperson to branches.
The ability to report opportunties in XL Reporter by region / territory is one we are often asked for, and this would extend to sales by territory (not necessarily the same as branch)

About Flash P2P live streaming from non-webcam sources

Hello, I am a university student. Our lab is attempting to work on a p2p live streaming using flash p2p features. The media source is not from a webcam but a file from a certain server, which is not directly supported by any of the 4 methods flash player offers(posting, direct routing , object replication,and multicast.) As some of the forum threads mentioned, our method is to use NetStream.publish() a stream and use send("callbackname", data) to all subscribers that have joined in a NetGroup. So we can use p2p transmission. Now here are our questions:
1. We know from MAX 2009 that flash p2p camera video multicasting implements pull-push mechanism inside which makes full use of p2p features like buffer map exchange. If we use NetStream.send() API to send non-webcam source data, will it also make use of this pull-push mechanism to spread data among all peers(subscribers) with proper data exchange?
or more detailedly,
I saw the P2P Gaming Libs at flashrealtime.com. It uses DIRECT_CONNECTIONS when creating publish-used NetStream in order to send data with lowest latency. My question is if I do not use DIRECT_CONNECTIONS, than when the NetGroup grow large (1000), will those peers that are not direct neighbors to the publisher in the same group relay data to each other using pull-push via buffer map?
2. I have written a sample app and use send() to deliver data only (NetStream.bufferTime = 0) without camera video and audio. When the publisher sends the data in a "for()" stantence for 20 times, the subscribers can only receive about 8 of them. But when I set a timer and periodically send them(e.g., 500ms), the subscribers can receive them correctly. My questions are: Is the packet loss caused by UDP unreliability? Can this be solved by setting the NetStream.dataReliable = ture? Can this totally be solved by setting a timer? How to set the delaytime property in timer? Are all data sent are orderedly received?
I'm very appreciated if you can answer my questions? thanks.

1. NetStream.send() data is delivered in the order it was sent, whether in client-server, DIRECT_CONNECTIONS, or multicast mode.
2. the lowest latency will be achieved with DIRECT_CONNECTIONS. however, that isn't scalable to large numbers of recipients. the P2P multicast system trades low latency for scalability.
3. there are no plans to support a natural NetStream streaming source that's not a camera/microphone. Flash Media Server can perform that function.
4. you should never need to implement "bitmap exchange"; the object replication system handles all the communication needed to accomplish its function. typically you will divide a file into segments, giving each one an index number. object replication uses ranges internally, so the index numbers should be contiguous. nodes that have indices use NetGroup.addHaveObjects(). nodes that want indices they don't have use NetGroup.addWantObjects(). nodes that have objects will send them to nodes that want the objects. when a node receives an object, it's automatically removed from its "want" set; once the node decides the object is acceptable, it adds it to its "have" set, at which point it can answer requests from other nodes who still "want" it. eventually every node will have all the pieces and not want any. for an example, please see Tom Krcha's articles on using object replication:
http://www.flashrealtime.com/file-share-object-replication-flash-p2p/
http://www.flashrealtime.com/video-on-demand-over-p2p-in-flash-player-101-with-object-repl ication/
5. please see Tom Krcha's articles. for VOD you will probably want to use the "LOWEST_FIRST" replication strategy, as that may allow you to start playing earlier. for general file replication you'll get better sharing if you use RAREST_FIRST.

How to use JMF in p2p system ??

I want to develop a system about p2p stream,and I use the jmf as the client.
could you guys suggest me ?? and provid some material to me ??
PLEASE !!!!

Find on the net AVReceive2, AVTransmit2, AVReceive3, AVTransmit3 and RTPSocketAdapter Java source files. Just search in google or yahoo, for instance, they are available everywhere. These are the the most used when beginning to work with JMF. Number "3s" are actually the ones you might be looking for. Something like p2p video/audio streaming.
Hope that helps

Complex mapping scenerio.

Hi Experts,
in my scenerio, in the Interface mapping, data from source reaches target through 3 stages. 2 XSL mapping, and then a graphical mapping.
In my scenerio, file is picked from FTP and posted to SAP through RFC .
In the sender File Adapter, I have to go for the FILE CONTENT Conversion. But In the interface mapping, data first enters the two XSL mappimgs and then the graphical mapping.
Now I dont understand hw to maintain the CONTENT CONVERSION mandatory parameters, becasue if I do so on the basis of the Graphical mapping source fields, that wont be correct, as data firsts passes through the 2 XSLT mappings, and then reaches the Graphical mapping.
I got the following errors in the communication channel.
Conversion initialization failed: java.lang.Exception: java.lang.Exception: java.lang.Exception: Error(s) in XML conversion parameters found: Parameter 'ROOT.fieldFixedLengths' or 'ROOT.fieldSeparator' is missing Mandatory parameter 'ROOT.fieldNames': no value found.
I donno hw to handle this.
Also , mine is a .DAT file, I dont understand how can i send it for drytesting and see hw is the load reacting to the FIRST XSL mapping, I mean is there any way i can check this??
Pls comment.
Regards,
Arnab.

Hi, did as u instructed, used the standard templete : GMTLogSenderFileChannelTemplate. The Interface Mappig used here is: GMTLog2POSDM.
Now I am getting the following error:
15:33:27 Start of test
Call XSLT processor with stylsheet GMTLog2IXRetailPOSLog.xsl.
TransfromerException during XSLT processing:
javax.xml.transform.TransformerException: java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: Array index out of range: 1429 at com.sap.engine.lib.jaxp.TransformerImpl.transform(TransformerImpl.java:255) at com.sap.aii.ibrep.server.mapping.ibrun.RepMappingTransformer.transform(RepMappingTransformer.java:150) at com.sap.aii.ibrep.server.mapping.ibrun.RepXSLTMapping.execute(RepXSLTMapping.java:81) at com.sap.aii.ibrep.server.mapping.ibrun.RepSequenceMapping.execute(RepSequenceMapping.java:54) at com.sap.aii.ibrep.server.mapping.ibrun.RepMappingHandler.run(RepMappingHandler.java:80) at com.sap.aii.ibrep.server.mapping.rt.MappingHandlerAdapter.run(MappingHandlerAdapter.java:107) at com.sap.aii.ibrep.server.mapping.ServerMapService.transformInterfaceMapping(ServerMapService.java:127) at com.sap.aii.ibrep.server.mapping.ServerMapService.transform(ServerMapService.java:104) at com.sap.aii.ibrep.sbeans.mapping.MapServiceBean.transform(MapServiceBean.java:40) at com.sap.aii.ibrep.sbeans.mapping.MapServiceRemoteObjectImpl0_0.transform(MapServiceRemoteObjectImpl0_0.java:167) at com.sap.aii.ibrep.sbeans.mapping.MapServiceRemoteObjectImpl0_0p4_Skel.dispatch(MapServiceRemoteObjectImpl0_0p4_Skel.java:104) at com.sap.engine.services.rmi_p4.DispatchImpl._runInternal(DispatchImpl.java:319) at com.sap.engine.services.rmi_p4.DispatchImpl._run(DispatchImpl.java:200) at com.sap.engine.services.rmi_p4.server.P4SessionProcessor.request(P4SessionProcessor.java:136) at com.sap.engine.core.service630.context.cluster.session.ApplicationSessionMessageListener.process(ApplicationSessionMessageListener.java:33) at com.sap.engine.core.cluster.impl6.session.MessageRunner.run(MessageRunner.java:41) at com.sap.engine.core.thread.impl3.ActionObject.run(ActionObject.java:37) at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(AccessController.java:215) at com.sap.engine.core.thread.impl3.SingleThread.execute(SingleThread.java:102) at com.sap.engine.core.thread.impl3.SingleThread.run(SingleThread.java:172) Caused by: java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: Array index out of range: 1429 at com.sap.engine.lib.xsl.xpath.DTM.getAttributeAndNSNodes(DTM.java:406) at com.sap.engine.lib.xsl.xslt.XSLCopyOf.copyElementNode(XSLCopyOf.java:70) at com.sap.engine.lib.xsl.xslt.XSLCopyOf.copyNode(XSLCopyOf.java:151) at com.sap.engine.lib.xsl.xslt.XSLCopyOf.process(XSLCopyOf.java:214) at com.sap.engine.lib.xsl.xslt.XSLNode.processFromFirst(XSLNode.java:296) at com.sap.engine.lib.xsl.xslt.XSLElement.process(XSLElement.java:248) at com.sap.engine.lib.xsl.xslt.XSLNode.processFromFirst(XSLNode.java:296) at com.sap.engine.lib.xsl.xslt.XSLForEach.process(XSLForEach.java:116) at com.sap.engine.lib.xsl.xslt.XSLNode.processFromFirst(XSLNode.java:296) at com.sap.engine.lib.xsl.xslt.XSLForEach.process(XSLForEach.java:116) at com.sap.engine.lib.xsl.xslt.XSLNode.processFromFirst(XSLNode.java:296) at com.sap.engine.lib.xsl.xslt.XSLTemplate.process(XSLTemplate.java:281) at com.sap.engine.lib.xsl.xslt.XSLStylesheet.callTemplate(XSLStylesheet.java:1355) at com.sap.engine.lib.xsl.xslt.XSLCallTemplate.process(XSLCallTemplate.java:111) at com.sap.engine.lib.xsl.xslt.XSLNode.processFromFirst(XSLNode.java:296) at com.sap.engine.lib.xsl.xslt.XSLElement.process(XSLElement.java:248) at com.sap.engine.lib.xsl.xslt.XSLNode.processFromFirst(XSLNode.java:296) at com.sap.engine.lib.xsl.xslt.XSLTemplate.process(XSLTemplate.java:281) at com.sap.engine.lib.xsl.xslt.XSLStylesheet.callTemplate(XSLStylesheet.java:1355) at com.sap.engine.lib.xsl.xslt.XSLCallTemplate.process(XSLCallTemplate.java:111) at com.sap.engine.lib.xsl.xslt.XSLNode.processFromFirst(XSLNode.java:296) at com.sap.engine.lib.xsl.xslt.XSLIf.process(XSLIf.java:32) at com.sap.engine.lib.xsl.xslt.XSLNode.processFromFirst(XSLNode.java:296) at com.sap.engine.lib.xsl.xslt.XSLTemplate.process(XSLTemplate.java:281) at com.sap.engine.lib.xsl.xslt.XSLStylesheet.process(XSLStylesheet.java:469) at com.sap.engine.lib.xsl.xslt.XSLStylesheet.process(XSLStylesheet.java:437) at com.sap.engine.lib.xsl.xslt.XSLStylesheet.process(XSLStylesheet.java:394) at com.sap.engine.lib.jaxp.TransformerImpl.transformWithStylesheet(TransformerImpl.java:412) at com.sap.engine.lib.jaxp.TransformerImpl.transform(TransformerImpl.java:244) ... 19 more
15:33:28 End of test
Pls comment.
Regards,
Arnab.

How to send status message in SOAP to IDOC scenerio without BPM

Hi,
I have a SOAP to IDOC scenerio in which we require to send the status message back to user from XI that " IDOC has been sent successfully to SAP system"
We do not want to use BPM bacause of performance issues.
Can you please help me how to achieve this synchronous response without BPM.
Note: We require the status message from XI that the IDOC has been successfully posted to WESAP system

Idoc only support async behaviour. U can't get the Idoc response as per ur requirement without BPM.
Better to go for abap proxy or RFC.
Or u may get the ack till XI.
Regards,
Prateek

XI and R/3 System connection settings for IDOC to File scenerio.

Hi SAP champs,
I am working on a IDOC to File XI scenerio. But I am confused while configuring connection settings at XI system and R/3 system. I am finding problem in transaction IDX2 to maintain the IDOC metadata. Please let me know the complete step by step system cofigurations in XI and R/3 systems for the scenerio. Thanks in advance..
Regards
Sanjeev.

Hi Sanjeev,
We upload Medata in IDX2 to just reduce runtime effort and hence to improve the performance. However it is not a mandetory step to be performed for R/3 TO XI scenario.
You are confused just because here you dont find any F4 help to select the metadata and the PORT.
Thanks
Sunil Singh

Complete file not displayed in File server(Idoc - XI File scenerio)

Hi,
Am working on Idoc-XI-File scenerio.
The target file is getting generated properly and complete xml n Adapter Monitoring in RWB.
But in the file server(in the directory)only part of the xml is displayed.The size of the file is 82KB.
Is there any configuration need to see the complete file in File Server.

Hi Amit,
This could be due to Network. How far is the file server from XI server?
I suggest putting the file in to local machine or in the same network and check whether it is OK.
- Pinkle

Billing in Third Party Scenerio

Hi All,
I completed the complete cycle for third party process.While i am trying to do billing for Third Party Scenerio, i getting a warning message "No Billing quantity has been determined".If i ignore it, i am able to create the billing.But the issue is that we are using a user-exit in billing.Because of the above message, User-exit fails.I want to aviod the error. Please guide me.
With Regards
Vinu.N

This error occur b'coz of two possibilities:
1) Check your billing relevance in Item Cat (VOV7) in your THIRD PARTY process or sales order. It should be F.
2) IR - Invoice receipt (MIRO) should have been completed before you raise a sales invoice.
+If you don't want IR to happen before raising sales invoice, select a relevant Billing relevance for your process Item Cat. +
Hope this can assist you.
Thanks & Regards
JP

P2P fulfillment and Clearing rule interaction

Hi,
I am facing an issue related to Promise to Pay (P2P).
We are using FP2P1 to create P2P. The open items listed in FP2P1 creation screen appear to be sorted based on net due date (ascending), document number( ascending), amount (descending). The user selects the open items from the top and downward, until the promised amount is exhausted. When the payment is posted, the clearing sequence configured in the clearing variant is that first by the cash discount due day (ascending), division (ascending) and main transaction (ascending). Therefore, the payment would clear the items that not included in the P2P, however, the fulfillment is calculated based on the each P2P item's clearing status. For example, the customer has promised to pay $200. P2P includes document A, B, C for the total of 200. The customer paid $200 before the check date. However, the payment has cleared document A, D, E. When the P2P is evaluated, it is not fulfilled because only document A is cleared.
I would like to sort open items in the FP2P1 creation screen in the sequential order that is consistent with our clearing rule. I checked event 182 to 191, but not sure if one of them is called at time of open item selection. Do you think it is possible to add open item sorting logic in event 187?
Thank you very much for your help.
Jennifer

Hi Amlan,
Thank you for your suggestions.
Our clearing rule reflects the regulatory and business requirements and therefore we cannot change it. If we create P2P based on the standard SAP open item sorting logic, and then clear them first, it would violate our clearing rule.
I do not quite understand your suggestion - "The P2P items against the customer account can be put on direct debit". Could you please elaborate it if you get a moment? Thank you!
I just received SAP's reply to my OSS message. Below is the reply:
"I checked the situation in our reference system and I found out that
the displayed fields of the open item processing in transaction fp2p1
results from customizing (under FI-CA=>Basic Functions=>Open Item
Management=>Define Line Layout Variants for Open Item Processing).
Unfortunately there is no possibility to define a default sorting
variant. Also in the open item processing itself is no option to
define a default sorting. As the functionality does not exist I
recommend you to fill a development request. In SAP note 11 you'll
find more information about it."
Jennifer

P2P scenerio

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for