Planning for Assessment cost element

Hi
How we can do the planning for Assessment cost element ?? why it is different from other secondary cost element planning.
Thanks
Deepak

both are two different things in term of business applications.
When you know exact amount to be planned at cost center level then this is SCE planning and when you dont know exact amount then that can be done through assessment planning.
Hope this helps you.
Ashokl

Similar Messages

  • How to find the origin costs(primary CE) for Assessment cost elements

    Hi All,
    How can we trace the Orgin costs(cost senders) for Assessment cost element.
    I have to create Co report where user wants the Costs senders(primary cost elements) details for Assessment cost element.
    Our cycles are defined as senders -  cost center and receiver's are Internal orders.
    so for assessement cost elements what are the primary cost senders.
    Is it possible to trace the primary cost elements details for Assessment cost elements.
    Regards,
    Raj

    Hi Chirstian,
    Thanks for the information.
    I have done the same as per your advise.
    I am trying to pull all the primary cost elements which are posted with my sender cost center's.
    All the cycles are defined as share in % = 100%.
    But unfortunately all the debits are of primary cost elements is not equal to credit amount of my Assessment cost element.
    The figures are very far and couldn't trace the difference amount. Is there any other report in SAP or how i can define in report painter to meet this requirement.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Raj.

  • BAPI for  ""Change Cost Element / Activity Input Planning ""

    Hi
    Is there any BAPI for  ""Change Cost Element / Activity Input Planning "" ( TC KP06) as there is BDC for that but is goes through lot of steps . ( TC OKKS, KP04, KP06 )
    So if any one know the BAPI for the same please let me know,  and if possible send me your code also it will be really help full.
    Regards

    o   OBJECT_INDEX - Index uniquely identifying the row and thus the           
        object. The index must be greater than zero and may only appear once     
        in the table. If the index does not exist in INDEXSTRUCTURE, the row     
        is ignored.                                                                               
    o   COSTCENTER    - Cost center that includes the activity.                                                                               
    o   ACTTYPE       - Activity type that includes the activity. You must       
        fill this together with COSTCENTER. You only need it for an activity     
        input that is activity-dependent.                                                                               
    o   CO_BUSPROC - Business process that includes the activity.                                                                               
    o   ORDERID       - Order that includes the activity.                                                                               
    o   WBS_ELEMENT  - WBS element that includes the activity                                                                               
    You may fill one object only,for example COSTCENTER, CO_BUSPROC,             
    ORDERID, or WBS_ELEMENT.                                                     

  • Cost Center Assessment - cost element type 42

    Hi dear All,
    I got issues running KSU5 to allocate planned costs under cost element type 42. we were expecting that all planned costs (primary and secondary(cost element type 42)) could be allocated by credit cost center (actual). only primary costs are being allocated.
    Scenario:
    cost center planning (kp06) 1000 currencies in primary cost element in cost center A
    running planning assessment - KSUB: cycle uses assessment cost element (type 42): sender cost center A, receiver cost center B (all planned values). assessment cyles posts 1000 currencies from CC A to cost center B
    planning in cost center B (primary cost elements through kp06, 500 currencies) total planning 1000 from previous assessment  with CE type 42, and 500 from cc planning in a primari CE.
    by the period end closing, tcode KSU5 (allocation actual) is running. new cycle created, based on planned values (origini not actual, but planned amounts).
    we were expecting to allocate 1500 currencies from cost center B to cost center C (using 100% and through assessment cost element)).
    result: credit actual cost center B = 500 currencies debit actual cost center C = 500 currencies.
    1000 currencies pending on cost center B (planned).
    do you know why SAP is not allocating the 1000? even if those 1000 were planned in cost center B by assessement, a new allocation cycle should be able to post them or not?
    thank you for your outcome.

    Hi dear Ajay, thank you for your answer.
    first, I understand the difference between KSUB and KSU5, in the defined scenario, we have both. planned values, become actual with the MEC activities. business definition.
    regarding the cycle, I have setup assessment cost element so we can get all planned lines posted as 1.
    On sender tab I have only the cost center. no cost element defined.
    receiver its cost center.
    furthermore, i've not setup allocation structure, so all cost elements should be allow, there is no restriction on this.
    the only difference is: planned costs which their origin is already an assessment are not being assessed again.
    I can show you the print screens with cycles setup if it helps
    best regards
    MF

  • Is it possible to make a planning on a cost element group?

    Is it possible to make a planning on a cost element group? I have created several cost element groups with the appropriate hierarchy. Now my aim is to try to allocate cost on an element cost group.
    Thank you in advance for your reply.
    Best regards
    Pascal Cuenin

    Yes you can - There are multiple ways of doing it.
    If you have the BPS module, you can do it over there - If you want to do it in R/3, you can there too. Go to KPZ3 to view previous budget planning for Cost Center Groups.
    Hope that helps.
    Thanks,
    Nandita

  • Overlapping values were maintained for characteristic Cost Element

    Dear SAP Gurus,
    I am Finding one error while chaing my Primary Cost Planning in CJ40. The error note as follows.
    *"Overlapping values were maintained for characteristic Cost Element*
    *Message no. K9050
    Diagnosis
    You maintained several characterisic values for characteristic Cost Element in layout maintenance or in the entry screen for planning.
    Within these characteristic values
    individual values appear more than once
    individual values are included in an inteval
    intervals overlap
    These duplications and overlaps are not forseen in planning.
    System Response
    The entries for characteristic Cost Element are rejected.
    Procedure
    Change the entries in the layout maintenance/entry screen for planning."
    Please help.
    Rgds
    Rohit

    Hi,
    Step1. Go to CJ40.
    enter in the cost planning area->Select the topmost line item->Primary cost.
    Then Extras->Group Display--> Cost element
    Is it the same what you have checked in the KAH2?
    Step2: Then check Extras---> Error Log
    Step3: Then check Extras--->Diplay Profile
    Step4: Now Go to Tcode: KP34 and check the layout assigned to WBS elements: Cost element/acty inputs and make sure the check mark is present against it in item column.
    Step 5: Now check Extras--> Display Profile.
    Make sure its same as that of Step4.
    Hope its useful.
    Reward points if useful.
    Thanks..

  • Sender Cost Element Group role in Assessment Cost Element Cycle

    Hello,
    We have an assessment cycle as below:-
    Assessment Cost Element - 6000000
    Sender Rule - Fixed Amount
    Receiver Rule - Variable Portions
    Sender Cost Center - 1000
    Sender Cost Element Group - ABCD
    Receiver Order Group - XYZS
    Sender Values - 2,00,000 USD - Cost Center 1000
    Cost Element Group in Receiver Tracing Factor tab - EFGH,
    When I see the line item report of sender cost center 1000, I am able to see the total value as 2.00,000 USD credited, but I am not sure about the role of Sender cost element group ABCD in this situation.
    Also what is the role of receiver cost element group EFGH?
    Please advise.
    Thanks
    Tapan

    Hi Tapan,
    When you have selected in sender rule fixed amount then the system will transfer that amount to the receiver cost center specified irrespective of the total amount of cost element group existing in the sender cost center. There is no significance of cost element group mentioned in the sender rule then.
    The role of the receiver cost element group in the tracing factor is used to apportion the amount of the sender according to the expenses existing on the orders in your case.
    Regards,
    Divraj

  • Table that contains the change date for every cost element

    Hi everyone!
    Can anyone please help me find a table which contains the change date for every cost element?
    Thanks,Jess

    If you basically want to find out if anyone changed the cost element, you need to use transaction KA05 and enter the cost element and controlling area.
    This would actually bring you whatever field was changed and on double clicking give you the actual change and the date on which the change was made.
    Problem is this change date is actually the creation date of a change document which is in the table CDHDR.Its not like the change date is on any master tables.
    Hope this helps
    Deepa

  • OKB9 for secondary cost element

    Hello all,
    Does anyone know a way to rederive cost center for secondary cost element posting? We have a need to re-derive the cost center of a production order at the time of settlement. I tried OKB9 and OKC9 and it didn't work.
    Any help will be greatly appreciated.
    Thanks,
    Cassandra

    Hi,
    I am not sure if i understand your scenario. However, if you want to control the settlement to Cost Center on Cost Elements, you can use the Source Structure which will be assigned in the settlement parameters for the Production Order.
    Kind Regards
    Umapathi G

  • Number convention for Secondary cost element

    Hi,
    Anyone can guide me how to check the number convention for secondary cost element being set up in SAP?
    thank you

    Hi,
    The best way so far i have experienced is:
    Start the numbering with two digits from your company code and then cost element category and then the numerics.  If you have too many Cost elements, better to have 10 Digit numbering system.
    Assumption: You have multiple company codes
    For Example you company code is TP01
    Activity Type Cost element:
    TP43000001 - Labour Hours
    TP43000002 - Machine hours
    and so on
    This is easy for identifying either from the consultant point of view of the end user point of view
    Best Regards
    Surya

  • Table For Secondary Cost Elements

    Dear Folks,
                  Please Help me for getting details (TABLES)  of Secondary Cost elements Actual Line items Date wise and Cost Center wise
    Thanks in advance
    Regaards
    ASHOK K

    check this might help you..
    Tables to be refered for secondary cost element.
    Regards
    Kumar

  • Error in MIR7 - Different Material Vendor  planned for del. costs item in PO

    Dear All,
    We getting error during MIR7.
    We add two freight condtion ZFRO and ZFRT in purchase order  as below :
    ZFRO = we have add Rs. 350 against freight to Vendor(MATERIAL VENDOR)
    ZFRT =  We have add Rs. 100 for local freight which is paid to FREIGHT VENDOR directly (cash payment) i.e. paid for Transporter's Godown to our factory.
    Now during MIGO, store department has enter  as :
    1. ZFRT (Freight Vendor - FREIGHT VENDOR)
    2. ZFRO (Freight Vendor - MATERIAL VENDOR)
    Now during MIR7 we are getting following error :
    Different Material Vendor 300255 planned for del. costs item in PO 4500028018
    (300255 is FREIGHT VENDOR which is at Number 1 in freight tab of MIGO)
    Thanks and Regards,
    Nirav

    For good and service,
    In MIR7, select the option Goods/Service Item
    First do only for Good/Service item...
    After that, in MIR7 select only Planned Delivery cost and give the same PO number..
    Then you will receive a pop-up message to choose vendor..
    Here select one vendor and press continue..
    Then save you invoice..
    And again do the same and just select the other vendor..
    You can see 3 invoice number in PO history..
    One for goods charges and another two for freight charges..

  • Reports for secondry cost elements

    Hi,
    I have an issue with regarding secondry cost element with cost element category 42, now i need a report, which should conatine all senders (cost objects or cost elements) details, plz some help me out.

    Hi Vijay,
    As far as standard reporting goes, you can see sender cost center, receiver cost center and secondary assessment cost element from the CO line item report(KSB1 or any other co report). But you can't see what's the sender cost element group. May be development needs to be done if your requirement is sender cost element group.
    I hope this clarifies.
    Regards
    Rajesh A

  • Forecast for planning over the Cost element/Cost center with KP06

    Hi all
    I'm searching a idea: one of our chief controller need to insert a "forecast" of budget inserted over the various cost elements/cost centers using the transaction KP06. THe problem is that he don't want lost the budget because he can need the reload the previous budget data during the year if the actual situation change. Obvisiously the insertion of the forecast overwrite the budget data over the version 0. This forces us to download over a file the budget and archive it, and reload it eventually. But this solution, a part the programming effort, don't permit to have both the data at the same time in the system. Exist a pratical customizing solution in CO for manage a "forecast"? Our release is 46c.
    thanks
    Davide

    Thanks Pascal.
    Some questions (i dont' have a CO background ):
    >execute charge transferts and plan distribution in the new >version
    Can you explicate me these concepts (or the transaction used for make this, probably I know this but in italian the name is different)? The KP47 copy the value over the single cost element or only the total of cost center?
    >KP98 is the transaction to copy postings from version 0 to >another version. In this case version 0 is the template.
    Are you sure? The KP98 have the description "Copy by actual version to planned version", the KP97 "copy from planned to planned"
    thanks in advance
    Davide

  • Production Order - Segregating Costs for different cost elements.

    Hi Experts,
    I am a QM Key User and have been asked to look into improving our current Non-conformance / re-work process.
    My plan is to include the rework operations within the original PP01 Production Order.
    So far:
    Three Work Centres have been created:
    1. NCRTEST u2013 1st WC to collect hours
    2. NCRTEST2 u2013 2nd WC to collect hours
    3. NCROUTSO u2013 To collect costs associated with outsource operations i.e. weld repair, shaft straightening.
    NCR-02: Activity Type Created
    Two new control keys created
    1. NC01: Confirmation of hours
    2. NC02: Outsource operations (requisition generated)
    NCRTEST-CC: Cost Centre Created
    The Price Planning for Cost Centre/Activity has been specified (KP26 and KPB6)
    Two new Cost Elements have been created:
    1. 43001201 u2013 Costs associated with the outsource operation
    2. 94301021 u2013 NCR Labour Hour Costs 
    On a test production order we have managed to isolate the NCR hours to cost element 94301021 and the outsource operation costs to 43001201; however these costs are automatically settling to the production order material which then settle to the WBS (that is my understanding).
    Is there any way of stopping the costs associated with the two cost elements from settling to the Production Order material? The costs cannot be settled this way as my intention, is for a new development which allocate the costs to the relevant notification QM Order.
    The QM Order will then be settled in the normal way. Settling the production order and the QM order will result in duplicate costs.
    I am not sure if this is a possible solution but is it possible for a negative cost to automatically post to the production order material for the two cost elements. The production order value would be correct and the QM Order could be posted as normal.
    Thanks in Advance
    Ben

    Hi,
       I would expect that the costs get settled to the material only when you settle the production order to the receiver material. I don't think that happens automatically....it will have to be done explicitely
    regards
    Waman

Maybe you are looking for