Posting problem in MIGO

Hi experts,
When ever i am doing a goods receive in migo its showing an error.
" Account 810150 requires an assignment to a CO object"
what is the cause of this? can you please help me out to fix this problem.
Thanks & Regards.

hi chandra...
i think.......
GL Account 810150 is an Cost Element GL..
so its asking you assign the Cost center
<removed_by_moderator>
regards
deva
Edited by: Julius Bussche on Aug 21, 2008 10:22 AM

Similar Messages

Transfer Posting problem via MIGO MVT 311

While doing transfer posting through MIGO MVT 311 against reservation, we are facing the problem displayed below:-
"Check table XMRES: entry 0000000000 0001 does not exist
Message no. M7001
Diagnosis
In table XMRES the entry 0000000000 0001 is missing."

You cannot use 311 .311 is Moving material from one storage location to another -- Un restricted to another, Reserved stock can be moved by converting in to another movement type .Do movement 341in mb1c , if 341 is not there then go to moment type control
data and create particular moment type and run that for reservation no
document created and in valuation area

Problem in Posting Document through MIGO transaction

I am posting goods in MIGO transaction.When the goods are posted tables MSEG(Document Segment: Material) and table MKPF(Header Table for material) are getting updated for the new material.My requirement is to update the table QALS and QAVE with the new batch number getting updated in MSEG table.I have to fetch some data(Inspection Lot Number) from these tables.

Hi,
You can find data in these tables when quality checking is done, these needs to be set by functional consultants.
Chekc your process if any Inspection lots size is defined for each each goods movement at all, if not these tables will not be populated at all.
Regds,
Mano Sri

Badi/ User Exit - to update item data on Post GR in MIGO

Guyz,
I have a requirement to update the value in ALAN1 , ALAN2 fields while posting GR in MIGO. And also I need to access the value of realted PO (ebeln) and line item(ebelp) and equipment number(or serial number) EQUNR filed ,while doing the coding for this enhanemnet.
I was looking for Badi or User exit to meet the need. I have found a Badi MB_MIGO_ITEM_BADI, which I have implemented. I have put a break in the method and found that I can access all the value in the above mentioned field (IS_GOITEM, is the sturcture in the Badi signature) but one problem still persists.
I can see only the last line item(ebelp), in IS_GOITEM, where I need to see all the line item, so that I can relate which Equnr is assigned to which Lineitem.
Please tell me if you know any badi or user exit for this purpose.
Regd,
Anid
Points Guranteed
Message was edited by:
Anid

Hi,
we have checked above BADI;s but will not suffice the requirement;
The requiement is
While Creating PO(ME21N) and Changing PO(ME22N):
When the user tries to Save the PO:
All the line items should be accessible and can be editable.
If the validation fails, error message should be displayed on
the screen and user should be able to edit at that location.
Please let me know if there is any other way or enhancement point for the same...
Regards
Shiva

Service tax value required updating while posting GR in MIGO transaction

Dear Friends,
We have a following scenario where service tax value required updating while posting Goods Receipt MIGO transaction.
1. Purchase Order created for first line item where Qty. 1 and Net Rate Rs.1000/- so total Gross value will be Rs.1000/- example Vendor XYZ
2. Freight condition type maintained for the first line item for Rs.500/- and assigned to Transportation vendor ABC.
3. When Goods Receipt Posted for the Material against PO first line item, the material value updates Rs.1500/- (Material value as
    per PO + Freight Charges)
4. After posting GR while making Invoice verification through MIRO transaction against the PO GR/IR clearance will be done for
    Material vendor XYZ. For transportation Vendor ABC Planned delivery cost indicator will be select and since service tax is
    applicable Service tax code will also select.
Here the values of Service tax if the Material available in Stock it will be inventories. If stock consumed before making the Invoice verification for Transportation vendor ABC, then the Service tax values update to PRD account.
We know that in PO, tax code can be select for first line item (Raw Material) Vendor XYZ and if transportation charge condition type maintained for same first line item and assigned to Vendor ABC and there is no provision to maintain Service tax. So the service tax will get inventories while posting Invoice Verification for the transportation vendor.
We want the values of Service tax to update while posting Goods Receipt in MIGO transaction.
Thanks & regards
Dhanu

hi,
Please note at the time of MIGO Servecie tax value does not appear, it will appear at the tiem of Invoice only.
Regards,
Rama Mohan Bangaru

Validation on Posting Data in MIGO

Dear Experts,
My requirement is to put validation on Posting date during MIGO. How can i do that? Can i do it from OMJX?
Regards,

Dear,
You do this with screen or tannscation variant through SHD0 for MEGO here make filed posting date as display field or use BADI MB_MIGO_BADI for posting date check. There is nothing from configuration point of view.
Hope it will help you.
Regards,
R.Brahmankar

Excise invoice date should be equal to GR Posting date in MIGO (Part1 cap.)

Hi,
My client wants to have a date validation of "Excise invoice date should always be equal to GR Posting date" in MIGO (Part1 capturing)" whenever they do Goods receipt for excisable transactions.
As per SAP standard the system will display an error message whenever excise invoice date is greater than GR posting date in MIGO while capturing Part1.
But system will not display any error message when Excise invoice date is less than GR posting date. My question is why the system will allow to post the MIGO with part 1 entries when Excise invoice date is less than GR posting date.
Is there any BADI/User exits to put the validation of "Excise invoice date should always be equal to GR Posting date" (while capturing part1 in MIGO).
Also, after implementing this date validation in the SAP system, any serious impact to business with excise department (Indian excise scenario).
Please help....
Thanks & Regards,
Pavan
Edited by: cn_pavan on Aug 18, 2009 4:47 AM

hi
check whether any std user exit there for this process and code as per your logic and activate it

Doc Date is Greater than Posting Date in Migo

Hi ,
Document Date shouldn't be greater than Posting date in MIGO .How can I restrict it ??
Biswajit

Hi
We can restrict through Define Attributes of system messages
Settings for SYSTEM MESSAGES - Doc Date is Greater than Posting Date in Migo in that in that Message Type we can make the Warning Message to Error Message
regards,
senthil.

Want to assign output type while posting document in MIGO

Hi All,
I want to assign output type(WEE1) while posting document in MIGO txn.
It can be done through configuration but it won't apply in my case as I have some conditions to put as well.
If anybody could suggest for any User Exits/BADI/Enhancement spots for the same would be of great help.
Thanks in Advance.

Hi
There are many reasons why an update could be terminated, not
just
number ranges.
Go to transaction SM13.
Enter the date and user ID if known and find your transaction that was
terminated. Drill-down until you find which function (line) caused the
termination and double click. That should help you determine why the update failed.
update was terminated
regards
kunal
Edited by: kunal ingale on Nov 7, 2008 7:03 AM

P45 Diamond Post Problem

Hi,
I'm starting to have another post problem with my P45 Diamond motherboard. (First one was RMA'd). This time, it's showing "Processor Initilization" with red, green, green, red. My current system is
Motherboard - MSI P45 Diamond
Bios - 1.3
Processor - Intel Q6600 (older version)
Memory - Kingston KVR1333D3N9K2/4G 4gb total 1333
Power Supply - Silverstone 750 watt
Graphics - ATI Radeon HD 3870 X2
It's been working fine for a few weeks and just started acting up. I'm using stock settings (no overclock) .
Recent changes are adding the Genie, however the post problem happened for the first time before I plugged in the Genie. The same result now occurs when the Genie is plugged in and when I remove it from the motherboard power.
Basically what happens is it will power up for the first time and it works. If I restart or shutdown and turn it back on the monitor stays blank and the status lights show Red, Green, Green, Red which is Processor Initilization. Only way to get it to boot up is hitting the Clear CMOS button or, when I went to bed and started it up this morning, it booted fine.
Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.

Quote
The MCH voltage in Core Center we being reported at 1.976 however I NEVER changed any of the values. Is it possible that the bios "AUTO" changed the value?
The question is this value is really set to 1.976V or if it just a misreport. Please start Green Power Center and check the voltage values there.
{Remove Dual Core Center from the AUTOSTART list to make sure it does not open automatically when Windows is loaded. You can start Green Power Center independently of DCC. Just have look at the Dual Core Center Installation folder. There should be a sub-folder that contains the GPC Application. Create a shortcut to it from the Desktop and you are ready to go.}

Alternative to posting problem reports via OSS?

Sometimes I find problems with SAP software, like the RFC library, that I'd like to be able to report, however I'm not always in a position to do so, as I may not be working at a client site at the time (and it would not be appropriate to log the problem under their installation).
What is needed, IMO, is a way to log these problems without the formality surrounding OSS and SAPnet. I imagine this would be important too for those coming into SAP for the first time from the Java side.
Perhaps the easiest way would be to mark a forum posting as a problem report, similar to the way it can be marked as a question. This would then allow for highlighting to forum members from SAP who could decide whether the problem warranted escalation.
Cheers,
Scott

Hi Scott,
i agree. There should be a possibility to create a linkage between OSS notes and SDN postings in some cases, because (besides or in addition what you've already said):
1. Problems which are reported to OSS might already have been resolved in SDN and vice versa. A common knowledge repository would be very helpful for both parties, i guess. In my opinion it's easier (and cheaper) to <b>verify</b> a possible solution published already in SDN than finding/creating a new one for OSS.
2. IMHO it's probable that a steadily increasing number of "productive versions users" of arbitrary SAP software components will start to post problems and possible bugs at the SDN forums in the near future. It's absolutely ok to redirect them to the OSS, since this is the official place to report and handle such issues.
But it should be possible for example to add a link referring the "SDN problem thread" to the customer message(s). The support team could then post the SAP notes number as a reply to the thread as soon as a solution is available. Otherwise, if people aren't gentle enough to return to the forums and publish the problem solution, it's not easy to find the official answer, since nobody knows how to search for the corresponding note to get reliable search results. If the problem description of the note doesn't repeat parts of the question text in SDN, you are lost.
3. Resulting from 2., more and more "information leaks" will arise in the SDN forums. But i dare to argue that people will return asking the same question(s) over and over again, if there's enough interest, until "somebody" is lucky enough to find the solution in the OSS and post the notes number. Why not "automate" this?
Just to clarify:
I do <b>not</b> want to have the OSS team bypassed, this is definitely wrong from my point of view.
Cheers,
Stefan

MIGO Posting problem

hi Sapients,
i am running a normal MM Cycle, while in MIGO when i post the entry it show me the following Error
( Posting only possible in periods 2008/06 and 2008/05 in company code 2681
Message no. M7053
Diagnosis
The posting date entered is not within one of the permitted posting periods (current period/previous period).
This can be due to one of two reasons: The correct current period has not been set in the system. For the system, the first of the entered periods is the current period. At the beginning of a new period, your systems administrator must change the current period in the material master record, using the function "Shift periods". This has not yet been done. You have entered a wrong date in the field "Posting date".
Procedure
Check the posting date and correct it if necessary. If your input is correct, inform your systems administrator that the "period shifting" (period-end closing) process has not yet been completed. )
Please help me out
Regards
Maashish

as per your message the posting is possible for 2008/06..
So now go to MMPV
Enter values:
Co code - 2681
period : 07
year - 2008
First execute ...system show you the message, then again click on the execute button...then it'll execute....
You can check the open periods in OMSY...
Go on opening till you reach the current period 10 2008..
THIS WILL DEFINETLY SOLVE YOUR PROBLEM..
Regards
Priyanka.P

Problem with MIGO Transaction, while posting PO with quantities 0

When I try to post a PO using MIGO, with one or more quantites 0, the output type is not appearing in VL03N. An output type "OPOD( Proof of Delivery)" will appear if all the quantities of the posted PO is greater than 0 !!
How can I resolve this ? Points will be rewarded for useful answers.

Hi Naveen,
Thank you very much for the suggestion. I'm not much familiar with the MM module. Could you please give me some clue on where to find the check box ?

MIGO Posting problem show material does not exist

hi,
in migo i am not able to process it show me the following error message :-
(Material M11 PLN1 S11 does not exist
Message no. M7006
Diagnosis
For material M11, no material master data exists in plant PLN1, storage location S11.
Procedure
Make sure your entries are correct.
If your entries are correct, then storage location data does not yet exist for the material.
Storage location data is created when you maintain the Storage view for the material or use the 'Enter Storage Locations' function in the material master menu or post the first goods receipt (provided that automatic creation of storage location data is allowed for the given plant and movement type).
Please help me out
Kind regard
maashish

Hi,
Check Material is maintain your plant and storage location with MM03.
Enter MM03 t-code, enter material code and press enter then check material is maintain your plant and storage location.
If no than first maintain it with below mention detail.
Enter MM01 - For Material Master creation.
Enter your material M11, Plant - PLN1, Storage location - S11.
And maintain other required detail.
Then check with migo.
Regards,
Mahesh Wagh

MIGO Posting problem controlling area

hi Gurus,
In doing a migo i got the error message as below as
( Control indicators for controlling area 2681 do not exist
Message no. KI102
Diagnosis
No control indicators exist in fiscal year 2008 for controlling area 2681.
System Response
No further processing is possible without valid control indicators in the controlling area.
Procedure
Check your entries or define control indicators for controlling area 2681, fiscal year 2008 in configuration. Make sure that the fiscal year in the control indicators is a "from" fiscal year.)
please help me out
Regards
Maashish

Go to OKKP Controlling area and Select your Controlling area 2681 and Activate the same and Save.

Posting problem in MIGO

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for