Preference determination threshold value valid to date

Hi All,
We have an issue with Preference threshold value valid to date for many materials. As per our understanding the threshold value to date should be 31.12.9999 for all materials, but many materials valid to date is ended with 3rd Aug 2011. We are not very sure how the system determined valid to date as 3rd Aug 2011 instead of 31.12.9999 for specific materials.
Many C-LTVD's status is negative instead of positive due to wrong valid to date. The issue is in production system, not able to correct already issued C-LTVD's since revocation is not possible from negative to positive. Planning to re-issue manually prepared C-LTVD's to customer for impacred part numbers.
Any idea what is teh root cause behind setting up the threshold value valid to date as 3rd Aug.
Regards,
Lakshmikanth

Hi Jasmit,
The issue not resolved yet, no idea what happend in the system for to date of threshold value validity.
We provided report to list out of such part numbers and rectified manually.
Thanks
Lakshmikanth

Similar Messages

Configuration of FP-Modules. In the catalog is something written about sending data on data change. There is a checkbox in the FP-Explorer but I can�t find a configuration menu in FP-Explorer to set the threshold value at which the data will be send.

Configuration of FP-Modules. In the catalog is something written about sending data on data change. There is a checkbox in the FP-Explorer but I can�t find a configuration menu in FP-Explorer to set the threshold value at which the data will be send.

: Configuration of FP-Modules. In the catalog is something written about sending data on data change. There is a checkbox in the FP-Explorer but I can�t find a configuration menu in FP-Explorer to set the threshold value at which the data will be send.The FP-1600 modules automatically send data on-change only. The change threshold is by default 0%. Any change, even a single least significant bit change, is sent back to the computer. If the FP-1600 firmware revision supports deadbanding (firmware revision 3.0.x and later, can be downloaded from ftp://ftp.ni.com/support/fieldpoint/Update/FPEthernet0320.zip ). Then on each analog channel or count channel you can specify a percentage change for deadbanding in FieldPoint Explorer. This is done on a channel by channel basis, by right-clicking on the particular IO module and choosing Edit this Device, then choosing Channel Configuration. Each channel (if it supports deadbanding) will have a deadband entry box on the middle right side of the screen).
The FP-1000/1001 seri
al network modules do not support deadbanding. The checkbox in FieldPoint Explorer is simply for how FieldPoint Explorer displays the data to the user and does not effect client programs nor the behavior of the network module itself.
Regards,
Aaron

Dump in user exist CC01 to set default value to valid from date

Dear friends,
Task is to set default value to valid from date field in Transaction "CC01".
In INCLUDE ZXCCAU01 of Function 'EXIT_SAPMC29C_001' in Enhancement 'PCCD0001' I written the code like this
DATA var LIKE sy-datum.
var = var + 1.
which is not related to program by creating project and activated the project.
When I run cc01 it is giving dump.
Error is :
Program "SAPLXCCA" tried to use screen 1000.
The screen does not exist.
Can some one guide me What is the problem and How to resolve this.
If not, Is there any other method this can be done.
Regards,
Venkat

Hi venkat,
DATA var LIKE sy-datum.
var = var + 1.
the code u written i guess not ok.The code used by kishan is correct. i.e
DATA var LIKE sy-datum.
sy-datum = sy-datum + 1.
var = sy-datum.
write var.
use the above code.
SAPLXCCA is a functionpool not a program.please check the same.
regards,
Nagaraj

"No valid settlement date could be determined"

When trying to create partial settlement we are getting the error "No valid settlement date could be determined"

Already you opened a similar thread on 6th and closed as Unanswered. Check here
["No valid settlement date could be determined"|"No valid settlement date could be determined";
Now you have opened a new thread which could have been avoided by changing the status of the above thread. Anyway, though lot of notes are there, you can have a look at the following notes:-
=> Note 75778 - Consulting/troubleshooting for rebate processing
=> Note 105681 - Consulting: New rebate procedure
=> Note 1065418 - Incorrect date calculation within rebate processing
G. Lakshmipathi

Rebates" No valid settlement date could be determined"

When trying to create partial settlement we are getting the error "No valid settlement date could be determined"

Already you opened a similar thread on 6th and closed as Unanswered. Check here
["No valid settlement date could be determined"|"No valid settlement date could be determined";
Now you have opened a new thread which could have been avoided by changing the status of the above thread. Anyway, though lot of notes are there, you can have a look at the following notes:-
=> Note 75778 - Consulting/troubleshooting for rebate processing
=> Note 105681 - Consulting: New rebate procedure
=> Note 1065418 - Incorrect date calculation within rebate processing
G. Lakshmipathi

Cannot determine a value for an exit variable in the Formula fn w/p empty

Hi All,
We have an exit variable Z_EX_AR_VAR, the would read a hierarchy node input variable (Z_HN_AREA), which is furthur based on a hierarchy input variable (Z_HR_AREA), and wouuld return the first leaf of it.
We have implemented a input ready query based on this exit variable and it is getting the first node and is input ready and saves the data to the database.
It works well in the query when we have filtered the characteristic with the hier and hier node and the exit variables.
We need to use the same value to be used in the Fox function.
As per the requirement, the Fox function has to process the zero (empty) records.
So, we have customized formula function to process emptry records.
And in the function of type formula function that processes empty records, we have used the following statement.
DATA AR type ZAREA.
AR = VARI ( Z_HN_AREA, HIENM=Z_HR_AREA, 1).
We are getting the following error message:
Cannot determine a value for the variable Z_HN_AREA.
Planning function ended with errors.
What is that we are doing wrong here. Is it with the 'Process Empty Records' function that cannot read the variable.
How come this variable is working in the query and it is not working in the FOX.
We have done the variable to variable binding in the WAD also. Still the same problem.
Any ideas? Thanks in advance.
Best Regards,
- Shashi
Thanks in '

Hi All,
Michael Wolf from SAP confirmed that we cannot use VARiable read functions in the customized Formula function that processes the zero (empty records) as he spoke to SAP AG about the issue.
Hence we have made a work around by creating a valid record using a dummy key figure in the Custom Formula function that processes empty records so that in the next step, the regular Formula function would get executed, where we could access the variable values by using VARV, VARI functions.
Thanks,
- Shashi

Threshold value problem.

Hi, experts.
Now, I'm testing the preference calculateion.
After I save sales order document, the sales order I saved is replicated to the GTS server.
And, the threshold value is calculated by the system.
In my understanding, the threshold value should be come from the rule that is assigned to the relevant product.
When I excuted the preference calculation in GTS system, the threshold value is calculated correctly.
But, after the GTS system get the sales order document from the ERP system the value is different from the value of the preference calculation excuted in GTS system.
And even I changed the rule's condition(%), the threshold value of the sales document in GTS system is not changed.
But, the threshold value of GTS's preference calculation transaction is changed whenever I changes the rule.
I want to know how to solve this issue.
The threshold values shouldn't be different from each other.
Thank you for reading.
Best regards,
Jong Hwan.
Edited by: Jong-Hwan Park on May 26, 2011 5:11 AM

Dear. Marc P. Gilomen.
I totally understand what you are written above.
The threshold value shouldn't be changed until I change the rule related to the product.
However, after I changed the rule, I have expected the threshold value should be changed according to the rule.
But, it's not.
This is the point.
After I change the rule, for example 35% to 45%, the threshold value of GTS preference determination transaction '/SAPSLL/PRECA01' is changed. But, The replicated sales order's threshold value is not changed. And delivery, billing is the same with salesorder also.
It's not changed whatever I do.
So, I want to solve this problem. But until now, I didn't find the answer.
Thank you for reading.
Best regards,
Jong Hwan

Tables for threshold value in GTS 11

Good morning,
to get away from our old ERP preference calculation we bought a license for GTS. At the moment we are discussing implementing version 10.1 or even 11.
I am worrying as I am not sure, how to put data out of GTS to BI (BW) with version 11. We need the price and the threshold value (former table MMPREF_PRO_....) and those for the vendor declaration from supplier and the compression. (LFEI/MAPE).
Does anybody has experience with getting this into BI? And the "new" tablenames in GTS?
Hope, my questions are not too dumb, but we are just starting.
Thanks for any help and have a nice day.
Rgds Alex Linck
Kostal Germany

Hi ,
Customize as per the path given below for the GTS to BI(BW) data replication.
IMG : Integration with Other mySAP.com Components >> Data Transfer to the SAP Business Information Warehouse >> General Settings >> Maintain Control Parameters for Data Transfer.
GTS > General Setting > Document Structure > Define Document Types Turn on > Transfer to SAP Netweaver BI Active flag .
GTS > General Setting > Document Structure > Define Item Categories > Transfer to SAP Netweaver BI Active flag .
GTS > General Setting > Organizational Structure > Control at Foreign Trade Organization [FTO] for SAP NW BI > In the BI Active column, this flag is turned on for active FTOs.
Ashish

CCMS threshold Value baseline calculation

Hi Guys,
I am looking CCMS threshold value baseline calculation for ECC, BW, XI, SRM, CRM, APO & Solman systems. Many portals are provided the description of each MTE class , but not provided baseline calculation.
Please let us know some expertise advice
Thanks.
Manjunath

Dear. Marc P. Gilomen.
I totally understand what you are written above.
The threshold value shouldn't be changed until I change the rule related to the product.
However, after I changed the rule, I have expected the threshold value should be changed according to the rule.
But, it's not.
This is the point.
After I change the rule, for example 35% to 45%, the threshold value of GTS preference determination transaction '/SAPSLL/PRECA01' is changed. But, The replicated sales order's threshold value is not changed. And delivery, billing is the same with salesorder also.
It's not changed whatever I do.
So, I want to solve this problem. But until now, I didn't find the answer.
Thank you for reading.
Best regards,
Jong Hwan

Source List Validity Start Date

I have noticed that, if the source list validity start date and contract validity start date are same then, the contract price is not considered while creating PO and receive error message as "Source not included in list despite source list requirement"
If I change the validity start date of source list to one day before the validity start date of Contract then system is picking the contract price in PO and able to save PO successfully.
Is there any way to create PO even if the validity start date of source list and contract are same?

from OSS Note 44368 - ME51 ME57 Contract as source of supply
A contract that is valid on the delivery date but not on the current date is not taken into account in the source determination process.
Cause and prerequisites
This is programmed this way.
Solution
For reasons of upward compatibility, check will continue to be carried out on basis of current date.
However, if you wish the check to be against delivery date, you can implement the modification described under the advance corrections.
If Note 116464 is implemented in a 4.0B Release, use the advance correction from Release 4.5A, however, in Release 4.0B the program name is LMEQRF01.

How to determine the value of a Standard Value in a routing operation

Dear Experts,
Kindly guide me on how to detemine the value of my Standard Value in the operation of my routing, or in the phase of my Master Recipe.
I mean what determines the value that I enter for the Standard Values: Machine and Labor in the phase of my Master Recipe?

Hi,
In the Routing / Master Recipe, the standard values are based on the lot size.
For Example, if you have the lot of 100 KG, then in recipe the machine time will be 2 hr and labor time will be 2 hours, it means to make 100 KG we require 2 hrs of machine and 2 hrs of labor.
Normaaly all production manager / supervisor will have the date for the hours. The system will calculate will respect to batch / lot size.
If you have order for 1000 KG, then the system will assign 20 hrs for Machine and 20 hrs for labor.
This will be used for Capacity planning and Costing.
Capacity plan here your requirement is 20 hrs for machine and labor. If you have a reacto which wil run for 24 hrs a day, then the order will be completed in a day.
Costing is concerned, all std. valur key will be assigned with an activity type in work center / Resources and the prices for activity type / cost center will be maintained in KP26.
Based on the cost and hours, the system will allocate cost for the order (it will be planned cost). When you are confirming the order you will enter the actual time for the operation, then that will be your actual cost.
Pl do a sample test scenario in your sand box, and surely you will understand more.
The data for Routing / Recipe will be provided by the production manager of the plant and activity price will be provided by the finance team.
Thanks,
JK

Adding threshold values in an existing query

Hi All,
I have to update an existing query.
The original query gives me the value of Debtors to sales ratio for each division (DTR value).
Now, I want that for each division, there be a threshold value which should be compared with the debtor's value and if found higher than the threshold, the result should be in red.
The result being in red can be done at the front end, which in my case is Cognos.
But to store different threshold values for diffrerent divisions and then compare them with the debtor's values of the query, do I need to have a separate cube wherein I should store the divisions and their threshold values?
Or how can I go about it?
Thanks and best regards,
Sharmishtha

Hi Nagesh,
I do not have those values in the system but will be getting as external data only.
Divisions and debtors are separate info objects.
I have 12 debtors KFs (for 12 months) which get filled by an APD (data source is a query).
So, my final query has divisions in the rows and 12 debtors in the colm.
So, now i'll be given some threshold debtor value for each division which I need to bring in the query as a KF which can be compared in the query output.
So, what you suggested will it work in this requirement?
Also, can you elaborate on the method I need to follow?
Thanks a lot,
Sharmishtha

Consideration of factory calender in threshold values

Hi,
I need to consider the factory calender in the threshold values to check the due date of a task or a checklist item.
For example:
The task/or checklist item is due in 11 days (and the factory calender should be condsidered)
Does anybody know how to implement these checks in the threshold values of cprojects?
Thanks for your help!
Isabella

Dear Friend,
Ideally you should not change anything on Production server directly.
The normal & universally acceptable way is to transport the changes from Development or Quality to Production.
Still if you want to make changes on Production Server Directly (which even i dont recomend) you need to make Production Server in change mode thru T-Codes SCC4 & SE03 & make necessary changes.
Let me know if you need to know how to use T-Codes SCC4 & SE03.
Thanks,
Jignesh Mehta

CIF of SA is not consistent for Validity End Date

Hello gurus,
Our company is quite new in using SNC, and we bumped into this problem (see description below), and hopefully this forum can help us.
<Description>:
When the Scheduling Agreement is CIFed from R/3 (ECC) to SNC, the Validity End Date does not get updated each time.
It gets updated sometimes, but not always. It is inconsistent behaviour.
<Example>:
Scheduling Agreement A
Validity End Date: 31.12.2012 Changed to 30.11.2012 in R/3.
Performed CIF using Transaction Codes CFM1 and CFM2.
Correctly updated the Validity End Date in SNC.
For the same Scheduling Agreement A updated Validity End Date to 31.01.2013 in R/3.
Performed CIF using Transaction Codes CFM1 and CFM2.
The Validity End Date was not updated in SNC & remained as 30.11.2012.
For the same Scheduling Agreement A updated Validity End Date to 15.10.2012 in R/3.
Performed CIF using Transaction Codes CFM1 and CFM2.
The Validity End Date was not updated in SNC & remained as 30.11.2012.
Thanks guys
Tuffy

Hi Tuffy,
1 - I am just wondering if after the Delete the existing External Procurement Relationship in SNC, and CFM1 and CFM2 the SA (i.e. changed my validity end date value) to the SNC, will the problem of the SNC side not able receive the changed SA??
When there is a change in the SA, integration model would create the same in SNC if it does not exist. But the transfer from ERP does not happen just like that. First, make sure that the message type (CIFSRC) has been checked in BD50 and then schedule a job to periodically transfer the SAs.
2 - What does the tcode the person in the SNC side have to double check to ensure the SA is transmitted there??
The t-code is /SAPAPO/MTI2 - External Procurement Relationship.
3 - Someone in our company advise BASIS team to check the transactions BD50 and BD52. What exactly does it mean and does it help?
This is correct. I mean guys who are responsible for Integration model need to set-up BD50, BD52 so that changes to SAs are transferred periodically.
Regards,
Sandeep

Stock qty/value on specifiec date

Hi All
Can anybody explain how can we find the Stock qty and value on paricular date period through the table instead of transaction MB5B.I am waiting for your valid inputs.
Thanx

This is not possible as SAP only captures stock data at month level. Transaction MB5B actually uses posting date in material document to provide stock for a particular posting date; it does not read a table that provides stock data by posting date. Now if you need to view stock data at a particular month, this should be possible by viewing a combination of regular stock tables (e.g., MARD for regular storage location stock, MBEW for valuated stock at plant level, MKOL for consignment stock), and their historical data tables (e.g., MARDH, MBEWH, MKOLH).
Please keep in mind that the period data in these tables does not get updated every month. They are updated only if there is a stock posting affecting these tables on that particular month. As such, you will need to come up with the logic to project data for a particular month based on these tables, which should be possible using data from these tables.
Revi

Preference determination threshold value valid to date

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for