Problem in inbound delivery

Dear All,
Problem is related with vendor return cycle 122.
As we know whenever doing return delivery w.r.t. PO No. ,system opens quantity equals to return delivery quantity.
But in case of GR with refernce to inbound delivery it nat hepens in tha samw manner.
System should open the qty which is returned to vendor through mov ty 122 in respective inbound delivery.
System is giving following error message : "Essential transfer parameters are missing in record: 0000311346 000010
Message no. VL561"
Please tell me by which way is it possible.
Needed any configuration.
Thanks an regards
Gitesh

Hi Chunduri,
I think the problem is in Delivery Item Category.
First Check the Item categroy in the Inbound Delivery.
Later go to OVLP T-code and activate Relevant for Putaway in Warehouse Control and Packing Section.
Hopefully this cusmization should solve your issue.
Regards
Krishna

Similar Messages

Problems in inbound delivery - LIPS - NOWAB

There is a problem with inbound delivery field NOWAB ''NO GOODS MOVEMENT'' This field is filled and because this isnt possible to make the goods receipt. I have two questions about this. 1- Where is comming this marked field? (Purchase order, Material Master) 2- I can take unmark this field? Would he have some solution to carry through the Goods Receipt.?
Thanks,
Gustavo Nogueira

Ok

Problem in Inbound delivery creation

Hi all,
While creating Inbound delivery for a scheduling agreement in VL31N while saving the document i am getting the following error Item does not exist. and its getting terminated.
Regards,
Ram.

Hi,
Check whether Schedule line agreement has been released or not?

Inspection lot problem during inbound delivery

Hi,
I am facing following issue during inbound delivery.
I have activated inspection type 01 in material master for a packing material. Created a PO for the material through ME21N. PO created. Now I am creating inbound delivery through VL31N with reference to PO no and vendor. When I am entering the storage location I am getting the below error..
Upon investigating the issue system is creating the inspection lot
But inspection lot is not showing in QA32/QA02.
checked various threads but not of much use. I am not able to proceed further.
Kindly help.
Thanks
Kumar

Hi Kumar,
Plz check in PO history, if GRN is done. If yes then plz check in GRN quantity tab, if inspection lot is created. IN QA32, in dynamic selection enter the inspection lot and click on 'select all inspection lot' and check if it is created in system. If lot is prepared then as per the error message someone from your department must be processing it.
In Your inbound delivery screen check your tab status overview if it is A: GR not made or C: GR completed.
Also during inbound delivery storage location is picked up in inbound delivery automatically from PO you need not to enter it again.
Plz check else post screen shot of PO history and QA32.
Regards,
Priti.

Problem with MM Scheduling Agreement Inbound Delivery

Hello all Gurus,
I have a problem with inbound delivery. Whenever I am trying to create inbound delivery in VL31N with the total open quantity of MM scheduling agreement, I am getting a warning message as below
"Notified quantity less than goods receipt quantity".
If the quantity was less then 80, then I should get this message.
But the total open quantity in MM Scheduling agreement in ME38 is 80. So when I am creating the inbound delivery for 80, why system is giving me this warning message????
Kindly advise whether we have to maintain any settings anywhere or am I missing something here.
Thanks and Regards,
Umakanth.

Got the result.

EKES-DABMG error - Inbound delivery - good receipt

I have a big problem about inbound delivery (ID) ;
There are two ID for same purchase orders (PO1) item (POI1) and different delivery date .
      deliv. date   amount
ID1 ; 15.02.2007    10 pieces
ID2 ; 20.02.2007    25 pieces
When Goods Receipt take place for ID2 ( Migo - reference with inbound delivery ) ;
Table EKES ;
                ekes-dabmg
PO1 POI1 ID1 10
PO1 POI1 ID2 15
but I expect this one ;
                ekes-dabmg
PO1 POI1 ID1 0
PO1 POI1 ID2 25
Because I didn't do anything ( good issue ) for ID1 .
thanks a lot..

I solved this problem ; In table T163G , you must mark WEZUO field .
Customizing step ; MM - Purchasing - Confirmations - Set Up Confirmation Control

GR with Inbound Delivery

Hi everybody
I have problem with Inbound Delivery
- I created PO with confirmation control key = ANLI.
- After that I created Inbound Delivery refer to PO.
- When I post GR, system says there is no item selected.
- I go back to Inbound and see that Pick qty = 0.
- I tried to create TO to pick full quantity but error msg:
An internal error has occurred (L03T 0154 H )
Message no. L3705
Diagnosis
No screen sequence control is defined for the argument enclosed in parentheses in the error message.
Procedure
Contact your system administrator about this error. Note down the parameters in the error message and the situation that caused the error.
Do you know what i have to do to fix this problem?

No body help?
I have tried to create other PO with other Vendor - same material. After create DO, it auto fully pick, then i can process GR,
I think the problem is Vendor. I create new Vendor by copied from that Vendor but DO still have the same problem. do you know what i have to check for this case?

Sub: Inbound delivery deletion - reg.,(Big problem)

Hi guru's,
I have got a bid problem can anybody guide me, the problem is we did Migo from one plant for the P.O., & for the same P.O., we did Inbound delivery also, for the P.O., we did IRL . Now we got Migo Doc., No. & inbound delivery No.s., also Now what is the procedure to delete inbound delivery No's., in this scenario., please.
thanks in advance
tulja singh.

In bound Delivery can be deleted through VL32n
But before that u have to reverse IV & Migo

Problem with HU during creation of Inbound Delivery using IDoc

Hi,
When I am creating Delivery manually and perform Packing, Handling Unit information is stored in VEKP and VEPO tables.
But when I am processing through IDoc, after passing data to Handling Unit Segments E1EDL37 (Handling unit header), E1EDL39 (Control Segment for Handling Units), E1EDL44 (IDoc: Handling Unit Item - Delivery), It is creating delivery successfully but Handling Unit information is not getting stored in VEKP, VEPO tables.
Tried most of the notes 912470, 678464, 682506 and all of them say "<i>You use the Idoc DESADV to create inbound delivery with packing data. The delivery is created, Idoc gets status 52 but the Handling Units (HUs) are missing. This is due to a program error. In case the IDoc contains segments to create HUs (E1EDL37), the IDoc processing should end in error status (51) as long as no packing data could be created</i>.".
Need your advice whether we have to maintain any customizing for this or how to proceed with it.
Thanks in advance,
Murali.

IDocs and BAPIs sometimes behave differently than transactions. You might need to add a user exit specifically for IDoc processing. Otherwise send a message to SAP and have them look at it.

Problem in posting the goods receipt with reference to the inbound delivery

Hi All,
Below is the explanation of the scenario:
1. Materials are purchased (PO created in CAS as order unit) and inbound delivery document is created in cases as well.
2. When the TO is created for put away (we are performing put away using the hand held devices) the line item is split resulting in new line item number created
3. When the TO is confirmed the del quantity on the split line item is zeroing out and as a result the system is treating it as a service item with zero del quantity and is stopping from performing the GR with respect to the inbound delivery document
And also the inbound delivery is disappearing from the confirmation tab on the PO)
This is happening only with the materials which have an alternate unit set up in the material master (in this scenario CAS is the order unit and JAR is the base unit of measure)
Can some one help fix this?

Hi,
There is no standard option available and I don't think that there is any feasible way of stopping this without the use of a user exit (as already suggested).
But even the user exit option would be complex because it would have to block off the PO number field after enter (or any other key) was pressed.
It would also have to stop the use of multiple entries via the "find" option.
If you have a valid reason for doing this, have you thought of trying to get your users to do as they are told instead of changing the system?
Why is it important to have one PO per GR ?
Steve B

Problem in MIRO agains BILL OF LADING & INBOUND DELIVERY

Hi GURUS / EXPERTS,
I am using INBOUND DELIVERY AGAINST PO (VL31N) & POST GOODS RECEIPT,where I mention the BILL OF LADING in SHIPMENT at Header data. After that I use MIRO, during MIRO, i reference the bill of lading number Which is mentioned in the inbound delivery. But, only the freight and other charges vendors are pulled onto MIRO. Main Vendor (i.e. Material Supplier) is not appearing here.
Please suggest.
Thanks in advance.
DSC

>
Devendra Singh Chauhan wrote:
> Hi GURUS / EXPERTS,
>
> I am using INBOUND DELIVERY AGAINST PO (VL31N) & POST GOODS RECEIPT,where I mention the BILL OF LADING in SHIPMENT at Header data. After that I use MIRO, during MIRO, i reference the bill of lading number Which is mentioned in the inbound delivery. But, only the freight and other charges vendors are pulled onto MIRO. Main Vendor (i.e. Material Supplier) is not appearing here.
>
> Please suggest.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> DSC
Hi Devendra,
I want to know what are the steps to do the above mention proces. Can you please explain in details.
Thanks & Regards,
Mohar

Inbound Delivery Creation Problem with multiple batches

I would appreciate if you can guide me if there is any BAPI or FM to create the inbound delivery (VL31N) with the multiple purchase orders and with the multiple batches for the materials.
Regards
Prasad

TRY THIS ONE.
BAPI_INB_DELIVERY_CONFIRM_DEC
*& Report ZZ_BAPI_OUTB_DELIVERY_CONF_DEC
REPORT ZZ_BAPI_OUTB_DELIVERY_CONF_DEC.
data HEADER_DATA like BAPIOBDLVHDRCON.
data HEADER_CONTROL like BAPIOBDLVHDRCTRLCON.
data DELIVERY like BAPIOBDLVHDRCON-DELIV_NUMB.
data HANDLING_UNIT_HEADER_CROSS type table of BAPIDLVHDUNHDR.
data gs_HANDLING_UNIT_HEADER_CROSS type BAPIDLVHDUNHDR.
data RETURN type table of BAPIRET2.
parameters:
* Delivery number
p_deliv like BAPIOBDLVHDRCON-DELIV_NUMB default '0080015271',
* External Handling Unit Identifikation
p_hunr like BAPIDLVHDUNHDR-HDL_UNIT_EXID default '60000000000000000000',
* Handling Unit Material Number
p_humat like BAPIDLVHDUNHDR-SHIP_MAT default '000000000000002387'.
* Work on clean data. Allways.
clear:
header_data,
header_control,
delivery,
gs_HANDLING_UNIT_HEADER_CROSS.
refresh:
HANDLING_UNIT_HEADER_CROSS.
* set data values
header_data-DELIV_NUMB = p_deliv.
header_control-DELIV_NUMB = p_deliv.
delivery = p_deliv.
gs_HANDLING_UNIT_HEADER_CROSS-DELIV_NUMB = p_deliv.
gs_HANDLING_UNIT_HEADER_CROSS-HDL_UNIT_EXID = p_hunr.
gs_HANDLING_UNIT_HEADER_CROSS-SHIP_MAT = p_humat.
append
gs_HANDLING_UNIT_HEADER_CROSS
to
HANDLING_UNIT_HEADER_CROSS.
* Call Function
CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_OUTB_DELIVERY_CONFIRM_DEC'
EXPORTING
    HEADER_DATA                      = header_data
    HEADER_CONTROL                   = header_control
    DELIVERY                         = p_deliv
TABLES
    RETURN                           = return
    HANDLING_UNIT_HEADER_CROSS       = HANDLING_UNIT_HEADER_CROSS
commit work.
write: 'Finished'.
Edited by: pradeepvonti kumar on Nov 19, 2009 5:46 PM
Edited by: pradeepvonti kumar on Nov 19, 2009 5:48 PM

Inbound delivery problem

I have created one PO with output type EDI and PO contains 3 line items with HUM st.locs
While creating MIGO it is not generating inbound deliveries
simply saying 0002 is created.
Is it standard SAP ??what is the cause

create inbound delivery through Vl31N transaction then do GR
Edited by: Sridhar Jayavarapu on May 4, 2009 2:29 PM

Inbound Delivery: Inbound WHSCON IDoc with Batch Split - HowTo...?

Hello
We have another tricky problem to solve on our ERP 6.0 system.
My colleagues of Lindt UK create manually inbound deliveries (VL33N) which are replicated to the warehouse (DESADV IDoc -> TRADACOMS.ORDHDR).
When the goods arrive at the warehouse they send back a good receipts message (TRADACOMS.DLCHDR -> WHSCON IDoc).
In some cases we have a batch split because the goods have been put into different storage locations. Example:
- item 10: 200 Cases of product 4711, batch 10-2011, in storage location '0001' (free available for Sale)
- item 10:     5 Cases of product 4711, batch 10-2011, in storage location '0004' (damaged)
I am aware that in the inbound WHSCON item 10 is a main position and the two actual batch split positions are sub-items (900001 & 900002 with HIPOS = '10'). I tried to used E1EDL19-QUALF = 'BAS' (= batch split) with the sub-items but failed so far to update the inbound delivery that I can see the batch split.
I have managed to get one sub-item but not 2 of them. Somehow the system aggregates the quantities for both sub-items into the single item that shows up in the inbound delivery.
When we send the inbound delivery to the warehouse the item looks like this:
- item 10: 200 Cases (no batch yet, Putaway quantity = 0, because these data are coming from the warehouse).
QUESTION: Has anybody else been faced with a similar (if not identical) problem and how did you solve it?
Thanks a lot in advance for your valuable input.
Regards
Uwe

Hello Finbarr
I assume that you do NOT send any (suggested) batches to your warehouse. Otherwise you would have the same problem like we have that the WHSCON cannot overwrite a (suggested) batch.
However, if you just send the quantity per item then the batch split is much simpler than you suggested:
"First E1EDL24 segment:
POSNR     50
MATNR     000000000000602006
MATWA     000000000000602006
CHARG     L1519   " <<< first batch
LFIMG     37.000
VRKME     CT
"Second E1EDL24 segment:
POSNR     50
MATNR     000000000000602006
MATWA     000000000000602006
CHARG     L1880   " <<< second batch
LFIMG     37.000
VRKME     CT
Well, and as qualifier we use: E1EDL19-QUALF = 'XYZ' " a dummy
The SAP system is smart enough the realize that these two E1EDL24 segment belong to the same item yet have different batches and, therefore, yield a batch split in the delivery. The system generated the 9xxxxx numbers for this sub-item lines automatically.
Although I believe that it is not possible to change a batch in the delivery using an inbound WHSCON I would appreciate to have a final proof of this assumption. I could imagine that if you first delete the item containing the suggested batch and then add a new item with the actual batch from the warehouse it might works. However, this would require to implement a user-exit which I do not prefer.
Regards
Uwe
PS: It seems I gave an answer to the wrong question (should be EDI (DESADV): Can batches be overwritten by an inbound WHSCON (pick conf)? )

SAP System inconsistency for Inbound delivery / MIGO and a "sap note"

Hello Friends ,
After following SAP instruction on how to remove the inconsistency between posting GR through MIGO (Inv. mang.) and the reflection of the goods movement status in the inbound delivery document - done that using sap note 570991
the problem is that the system start behaving in a weird way throwing unjustified Error messages for any suggested goods receipt using MIGO with reference to inbound
for example after creating an inbound delivery document and trying to post it via migo , an error will pop up
- Inbound delivery storage location cannot be changed to here Message no. VLA316
the thing is i didn't even maintain any storage location entry up to that point and yet i cannot post any stock !!
also another error like
- Inbound delivery batch cannot be changed to *** here
which doesn't make any sense because there is not batches in the inbound document !!
i think this behavior is coming from the "Document Flow Update for Stock Postings" inbound indicator at the shipping parameter at client level customization
i need help on how to overcome this annoying SAP Bug/Problem specially i am in a post go live critical situation

Hi,
The messages you mentioned were introduced to avoid inconsistency between inbound delivery and IM, through the note: 1050944 - GR for inbound delivery using inventory mgmt as of ECC 6.00
If the messages are issued incorrectly, then you may check for SAP notes (I couldnt find anything relevant) or raise an OSS ticket to SAP.
Regards,
AKPT

Problem in inbound delivery

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for