Problems with VPN-Client 5.0 instoled on Windows Vista over ADSL Conecction

Hi, I have severals clients that they use Windows Vista and connects throw there lan over a VPN-Client. The clients that has an ADSL connection in there hose has disconect problems. Do you know why?? Do you know same workarround to do?? Thanks.
Regards.

Make sure that you have the right cable pinout and that your ISP has turned on the DSL service. Troubleshoot the DSL connection by watching the modem state of the ADSL interface as the line retrains.
To use the VPN Client, you need
- Direct network connection (cable or DSL modem and network adapter/interface card), or
- Internal or external modem
For further more troubleshoot click this link,
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/vpn_client/cisco_vpn_client/vpn_client500_501/release/notes/51client.html#wp1550392

Similar Messages

Problem with VPN Client and network access

We are running VPN client 4.0.1 on our laptops, and there are a number of users who are getting documents they are using on the internal network (off VPN) corrupted. The initial cause seemed to be the stateful firewall, but I have that turned off, and we are still getting it.
It only seems to be on the machines with VPN client installed, and it is only happening when the user is working on a file direct from the network drive. They are not connecting via the VPN client when the problem occurs.
any suggestions?
William.

Did you get any joy with this ? We seem to be having the same issue.
Thanks

Problem with VPN client on Cisco 1801

Hi,
I have configured a new router for a customer.
All works fine but i have a strange issue with the VPN client.
When i start the VPN the client don't close the connection, ask for password, start to negotiate security policy the show the not connected status.
This is the log form the VPN client:
Cisco Systems VPN Client Version 5.0.07.0290
Copyright (C) 1998-2010 Cisco Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Client Type(s): Windows, WinNT
Running on: 6.1.7601 Service Pack 1
Config file directory: C:\Program Files (x86)\Cisco Systems\VPN Client\
1      14:37:59.133 04/08/13 Sev=Info/6          GUI/0x63B00011
Reloaded the Certificates in all Certificate Stores successfully.
2      14:38:01.321 04/08/13 Sev=Info/4          CM/0x63100002
Begin connection process
3      14:38:01.335 04/08/13 Sev=Info/4          CM/0x63100004
Establish secure connection
4      14:38:01.335 04/08/13 Sev=Info/4          CM/0x63100024
Attempt connection with server "asgardvpn.dyndns.info"
5      14:38:02.380 04/08/13 Sev=Info/6          IKE/0x6300003B
Attempting to establish a connection with 79.52.36.120.
6      14:38:02.384 04/08/13 Sev=Info/4          IKE/0x63000001
Starting IKE Phase 1 Negotiation
7      14:38:02.388 04/08/13 Sev=Info/4          IKE/0x63000013
SENDING >>> ISAKMP OAK AG (SA, KE, NON, ID, VID(Xauth), VID(dpd), VID(Frag), VID(Nat-T), VID(Unity)) to 79.52.36.120
8      14:38:02.396 04/08/13 Sev=Info/4          IPSEC/0x63700008
IPSec driver successfully started
9      14:38:02.396 04/08/13 Sev=Info/4          IPSEC/0x63700014
Deleted all keys
10     14:38:02.460 04/08/13 Sev=Info/5          IKE/0x6300002F
Received ISAKMP packet: peer = 79.52.36.120
11     14:38:02.460 04/08/13 Sev=Info/4          IKE/0x63000014
RECEIVING <<< ISAKMP OAK AG (SA, VID(Unity), VID(dpd), VID(?), VID(Xauth), VID(Nat-T), KE, ID, NON, HASH, NAT-D, NAT-D) from 79.52.36.120
12     14:38:02.506 04/08/13 Sev=Info/6          GUI/0x63B00012
Authentication request attributes is 6h.
13     14:38:02.460 04/08/13 Sev=Info/5          IKE/0x63000001
Peer is a Cisco-Unity compliant peer
14     14:38:02.460 04/08/13 Sev=Info/5          IKE/0x63000001
Peer supports DPD
15     14:38:02.460 04/08/13 Sev=Info/5          IKE/0x63000001
Peer supports DWR Code and DWR Text
16     14:38:02.460 04/08/13 Sev=Info/5          IKE/0x63000001
Peer supports XAUTH
17     14:38:02.460 04/08/13 Sev=Info/5          IKE/0x63000001
Peer supports NAT-T
18     14:38:02.465 04/08/13 Sev=Info/6          IKE/0x63000001
IOS Vendor ID Contruction successful
19     14:38:02.465 04/08/13 Sev=Info/4          IKE/0x63000013
SENDING >>> ISAKMP OAK AG *(HASH, NOTIFY:STATUS_INITIAL_CONTACT, NAT-D, NAT-D, VID(?), VID(Unity)) to 79.52.36.120
20     14:38:02.465 04/08/13 Sev=Info/6          IKE/0x63000055
Sent a keepalive on the IPSec SA
21     14:38:02.465 04/08/13 Sev=Info/4          IKE/0x63000083
IKE Port in use - Local Port = 0xCEFD, Remote Port = 0x1194
22     14:38:02.465 04/08/13 Sev=Info/5          IKE/0x63000072
Automatic NAT Detection Status:
   Remote end is NOT behind a NAT device
   This   end IS behind a NAT device
23     14:38:02.465 04/08/13 Sev=Info/4          CM/0x6310000E
Established Phase 1 SA. 1 Crypto Active IKE SA, 0 User Authenticated IKE SA in the system
24     14:38:02.502 04/08/13 Sev=Info/5          IKE/0x6300002F
Received ISAKMP packet: peer = 79.52.36.120
25     14:38:02.502 04/08/13 Sev=Info/4          IKE/0x63000014
RECEIVING <<< ISAKMP OAK TRANS *(HASH, ATTR) from 79.52.36.120
26     14:38:02.502 04/08/13 Sev=Info/4          CM/0x63100015
Launch xAuth application
27     14:38:07.623 04/08/13 Sev=Info/4          CM/0x63100017
xAuth application returned
28     14:38:07.623 04/08/13 Sev=Info/4          IKE/0x63000013
SENDING >>> ISAKMP OAK TRANS *(HASH, ATTR) to 79.52.36.120
29     14:38:12.656 04/08/13 Sev=Info/6          IKE/0x63000055
Sent a keepalive on the IPSec SA
30     14:38:22.808 04/08/13 Sev=Info/6          IKE/0x63000055
Sent a keepalive on the IPSec SA
31     14:38:32.949 04/08/13 Sev=Info/6          IKE/0x63000055
Sent a keepalive on the IPSec SA
32     14:38:43.089 04/08/13 Sev=Info/6          IKE/0x63000055
Sent a keepalive on the IPSec SA
33     14:38:53.230 04/08/13 Sev=Info/6          IKE/0x63000055
Sent a keepalive on the IPSec SA
34     14:39:03.371 04/08/13 Sev=Info/6          IKE/0x63000055
Sent a keepalive on the IPSec SA
35     14:39:13.514 04/08/13 Sev=Info/6          IKE/0x63000055
Sent a keepalive on the IPSec SA
36     14:39:23.652 04/08/13 Sev=Info/6          IKE/0x63000055
Sent a keepalive on the IPSec SA
37     14:39:33.807 04/08/13 Sev=Info/6          IKE/0x63000055
Sent a keepalive on the IPSec SA
38     14:39:43.948 04/08/13 Sev=Info/6          IKE/0x63000055
Sent a keepalive on the IPSec SA
39     14:39:54.088 04/08/13 Sev=Info/6          IKE/0x63000055
Sent a keepalive on the IPSec SA
40     14:40:04.233 04/08/13 Sev=Info/6          IKE/0x63000055
Sent a keepalive on the IPSec SA
41     14:40:14.384 04/08/13 Sev=Info/6          IKE/0x63000055
Sent a keepalive on the IPSec SA
42     14:40:24.510 04/08/13 Sev=Info/6          IKE/0x63000055
Sent a keepalive on the IPSec SA
43     14:40:34.666 04/08/13 Sev=Info/6          IKE/0x63000055
Sent a keepalive on the IPSec SA
44     14:40:44.807 04/08/13 Sev=Info/6          IKE/0x63000055
Sent a keepalive on the IPSec SA
45     14:40:54.947 04/08/13 Sev=Info/6          IKE/0x63000055
Sent a keepalive on the IPSec SA
46     14:41:05.090 04/08/13 Sev=Info/6          IKE/0x63000055
Sent a keepalive on the IPSec SA
47     14:41:15.230 04/08/13 Sev=Info/6          IKE/0x63000055
Sent a keepalive on the IPSec SA
48     14:41:25.370 04/08/13 Sev=Info/6          IKE/0x63000055
Sent a keepalive on the IPSec SA
49     14:41:35.524 04/08/13 Sev=Info/6          IKE/0x63000055
Sent a keepalive on the IPSec SA
50     14:41:45.665 04/08/13 Sev=Info/6          IKE/0x63000055
Sent a keepalive on the IPSec SA
51     14:41:55.805 04/08/13 Sev=Info/6          IKE/0x63000055
Sent a keepalive on the IPSec SA
52     14:42:05.951 04/08/13 Sev=Info/6          IKE/0x63000055
Sent a keepalive on the IPSec SA
53     14:42:16.089 04/08/13 Sev=Info/6          IKE/0x63000055
Sent a keepalive on the IPSec SA
54     14:42:26.228 04/08/13 Sev=Info/6          IKE/0x63000055
Sent a keepalive on the IPSec SA
55     14:42:36.383 04/08/13 Sev=Info/6          IKE/0x63000055
Sent a keepalive on the IPSec SA
56     14:42:46.523 04/08/13 Sev=Info/6          IKE/0x63000055
Sent a keepalive on the IPSec SA
57     14:42:56.664 04/08/13 Sev=Info/6          IKE/0x63000055
Sent a keepalive on the IPSec SA
58     14:43:02.748 04/08/13 Sev=Info/4          IKE/0x63000017
Marking IKE SA for deletion (I_Cookie=2B1FFC3754E3B290 R_Cookie=73D546631A33B5D6) reason = DEL_REASON_CANNOT_AUTH
59     14:43:02.748 04/08/13 Sev=Info/4          IKE/0x63000013
SENDING >>> ISAKMP OAK INFO *(HASH, DWR) to 79.52.36.120
60     14:43:03.248 04/08/13 Sev=Info/4          IKE/0x6300004B
Discarding IKE SA negotiation (I_Cookie=2B1FFC3754E3B290 R_Cookie=73D546631A33B5D6) reason = DEL_REASON_CANNOT_AUTH
61     14:43:03.248 04/08/13 Sev=Info/4          CM/0x63100014
Unable to establish Phase 1 SA with server "asgardvpn.dyndns.info" because of "DEL_REASON_CANNOT_AUTH"
62     14:43:03.248 04/08/13 Sev=Info/5          CM/0x63100025
Initializing CVPNDrv
63     14:43:03.262 04/08/13 Sev=Info/6          CM/0x63100046
Set tunnel established flag in registry to 0.
64     14:43:03.262 04/08/13 Sev=Info/4          IKE/0x63000001
IKE received signal to terminate VPN connection
65     14:43:03.265 04/08/13 Sev=Info/4          IPSEC/0x63700014
Deleted all keys
66     14:43:03.265 04/08/13 Sev=Info/4          IPSEC/0x63700014
Deleted all keys
67     14:43:03.265 04/08/13 Sev=Info/4          IPSEC/0x63700014
Deleted all keys
68     14:43:03.265 04/08/13 Sev=Info/4          IPSEC/0x6370000A
IPSec driver successfully stopped
And this is the conf from the 1801:
hostname xxx
boot-start-marker
boot-end-marker
enable secret 5 xxx
aaa new-model
aaa authentication login xauthlist local
aaa authorization network groupauthor local
aaa session-id common
dot11 syslog
no ip cef
no ip dhcp use vrf connected
ip dhcp excluded-address 10.0.1.1 10.0.1.10
ip dhcp excluded-address 10.0.1.60 10.0.1.200
ip dhcp excluded-address 10.0.1.225
ip dhcp excluded-address 10.0.1.250
ip dhcp pool LAN
   network 10.0.1.0 255.255.255.0
   default-router 10.0.1.10
   dns-server 10.0.1.200 8.8.8.8
   domain-name xxx
   lease infinite
ip name-server 10.0.1.200
ip name-server 8.8.8.8
ip name-server 8.8.4.4
ip inspect log drop-pkt
ip inspect name Firewall cuseeme
ip inspect name Firewall dns
ip inspect name Firewall ftp
ip inspect name Firewall h323
ip inspect name Firewall icmp
ip inspect name Firewall imap
ip inspect name Firewall pop3
ip inspect name Firewall rcmd
ip inspect name Firewall realaudio
ip inspect name Firewall rtsp
ip inspect name Firewall esmtp
ip inspect name Firewall sqlnet
ip inspect name Firewall streamworks
ip inspect name Firewall tftp
ip inspect name Firewall vdolive
ip inspect name Firewall udp
ip inspect name Firewall tcp
ip inspect name Firewall https
ip inspect name Firewall http
multilink bundle-name authenticated
username xxx password 0 xxxx
crypto isakmp policy 3
encr 3des
authentication pre-share
group 2
crypto isakmp client configuration group xxx
key xxx
dns 10.0.1.200
wins 10.0.1.200
domain xxx
pool ippool
acl 101
crypto ipsec transform-set myset esp-3des esp-sha-hmac
crypto ipsec transform-set xauthtransform esp-des esp-md5-hmac
crypto dynamic-map dynmap 10
set transform-set myset
crypto map clientmap client authentication list userauthen
crypto map clientmap isakmp authorization list groupauthor
crypto map clientmap client configuration address respond
crypto map clientmap 10 ipsec-isakmp dynamic dynmap
archive
log config
hidekeys
interface ATM0
no ip address
no atm ilmi-keepalive
pvc 8/35
encapsulation aal5mux ppp dialer
dialer pool-member 1
dsl operating-mode adsl2+
hold-queue 224 in
interface FastEthernet0
interface FastEthernet1
interface FastEthernet2
interface FastEthernet3
interface Vlan1
ip address 10.0.1.10 255.255.255.0
ip nat inside
ip virtual-reassembly
interface Dialer0
ip address negotiated
ip nat outside
ip virtual-reassembly
encapsulation ppp
dialer pool 1
ppp authentication chap callin
ppp pap sent-username aliceadsl password 0 aliceadsl
crypto map clientmap
ip local pool ippool 10.16.20.1 10.16.20.200
ip forward-protocol nd
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Dialer0
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.0.1.2
ip http server
no ip http secure-server
ip nat inside source list 1 interface Dialer0 overload
ip nat inside source static udp 10.0.1.60 1056 interface Dialer0 1056
ip nat inside source static tcp 10.0.1.60 1056 interface Dialer0 1056
ip nat inside source static tcp 10.0.1.60 3111 interface Dialer0 3111
ip nat inside source static udp 10.0.1.60 3111 interface Dialer0 3111
ip nat inside source list 101 interface Dialer0 overload
access-list 101 remark *** ACL nonat ***
access-list 101 deny   ip 10.0.1.0 0.0.0.255 10.16.20.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 101 permit ip 10.0.1.0 0.0.0.255 any
access-list 150 remark *** ACL split tunnel ***
access-list 150 permit ip 10.0.1.0 0.0.0.255 10.16.20.0 0.0.0.255
control-plane
line con 0
no modem enable
line aux 0
line vty 0 4
password xxx
scheduler max-task-time 5000
end
Anyone can help me ?
Sometimes the vpn can be vreated using the iPhone or iPad vpn client...

I am having a simuliar issue with my ASA 5505 that I have set up. I am trying to VPN into the Office. I have no problem accessing the Office network when I am on the internet without the ASA 5505. After I installed the 5505, and there is internet access, I try to connect to the Office network without success. The VPN connects with the following error.
3 Dec 31 2007 05:30:00 305006 xxx.xx.114.97
regular translation creation failed for protocol 50 src inside:192.168.1.9 dst outside:xxx.xx.114.97
HELP?

Problem with VPN Client passthrough on ASA 5505

I am having a problem with passing through a VPN client connection on an ASA 5505. The ASA is running version 8 and terminates an anyconnect VPN. The ASA is using PAT. When the inside user connects with the VPN client, it connects but no traffic passes through the tunnel. I see the error
305006 regular translation creation failed for protocol 50 src INSIDE:y.y.y.y dst OUTSIDE:x.x.x.x
UDP 500,4500 and ESP are allowed into the ASA. Ipsec inspection has also been setup on a global policy, but the user still cannot pass traffice to the remote VPN he is connected through.
At the Main Office we have an ASA 5510 that terminates a site to site VPN, allows remote connections with PAT and allows passthrough no problems. Any ideas?

I am having a simuliar issue with my ASA 5505 that I have set up. I am trying to VPN into the Office. I have no problem accessing the Office network when I am on the internet without the ASA 5505. After I installed the 5505, and there is internet access, I try to connect to the Office network without success. The VPN connects with the following error.
3 Dec 31 2007 05:30:00 305006 xxx.xx.114.97
regular translation creation failed for protocol 50 src inside:192.168.1.9 dst outside:xxx.xx.114.97
HELP?

WRV200 - Problems with VPN Client and Internal network access

I have a WRV200 router and want to access the internal (Private Network) connected on the inside. I have successfully conected to the router with the Linksys VPN Client, but it does not appear to allow access to the internal network.
How do I enable NAT Transversal or Passthru? I have already selected all of the PPTP, L2TP and IPSEC Pass Through.
Has anyone gotten this to work?

I have actually gotten this to work. Issues surround this include the ability to get to the VPN if the main DNS is down (it does not fail over to the next DNS in the list).
If you unselect all of the boxes in the firewall General configuration, you can connect, but if you need to have all of this unchecked, what's the sense of having it?
Anyway, you can use the DoS Prevention, this is not interfering.
HTH.

Problem with VPN Client and PIX 7.0(5)

Hi, i have a problem configuring my pix 525 7.0(5) as a remote vpn server. I already configure the pix
sollowing this instructions (http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6120/products_configuration_example09186a008060f25c.shtml)
and i can establish a vpn using CISCO VPN Client; but i can't reach any resource from my inside network or any network define in the PIX.
I think that could be a missing nat or an acl; but i have do a lot of research but i can figure out the solution.
This is the configuration i apply
access-list cryptomap-scada extended permit ip any 172.10.0.0 255.255.255.0
access-list acl-vpn-sap-remoto extended permit ip any 172.16.42.64 255.255.255.224
access-list acl-vpn-sap-remoto extended permit icmp any 172.16.42.64 255.255.255.224
access-list acl-vpn-sap-remoto extended permit ip any any
access-list acl-vpn-sap-remoto extended permit icmp any any
ip local pool pool_vpn_sap 172.*.*.1-172.10.0.254 mask 255.255.255.0
nat (inside) 0 access-list cryptomap-scada
group-policy VPN_SAP_PED internal
group-policy VPN_SAP_PED attributes
vpn-filter value acl-vpn-sap-remoto
vpn-tunnel-protocol IPSec
username vpnuser password **** encrypted
username vpnuser attributes
vpn-group-policy VPN_SAP_PED
crypto ipsec transform-set vpn-cliente-remoto esp-3des esp-md5-hmac
crypto dynamic-map vpn-remoto-dymap 7 set transform-set vpn-cliente-remoto
crypto dynamic-map vpn-remoto-dymap 7 set reverse-route
crypto map siemens-scada-map 7 ipsec-isakmp dynamic vpn-remoto-dymap
isakmp policy 7 authentication pre-share
isakmp policy 7 encryption 3des
isakmp policy 7 hash sha
isakmp policy 7 group 2
isakmp policy 7 lifetime 43200
tunnel-group VPN_SAP_PED type ipsec-ra
tunnel-group VPN_SAP_PED general-attributes
address-pool pool_vpn_sap
default-group-policy VPN_SAP_PED
tunnel-group VPN_SAP_PED ipsec-attributes
pre-shared-key clavevpnsap
Thanks in Advanced

Hi, thanks for you response, if i remove the acl form de vpn filter, i get the same problem (i can't reach any host). This is the output from the command that you ask for.
PIX-Principal(config)# show running-config nat
nat (inside) 0 access-list cryptomap-scada
nat (inside) 9 JOsorioPC 255.255.255.255
nat (inside) 9 GColinaPC 255.255.255.255
nat (inside) 9 AlfonsoPC 255.255.255.255
nat (inside) 9 AngelPC 255.255.255.255
nat (inside) 9 JerryPC 255.255.255.255
nat (inside) 9 EstebanPC 255.255.255.255
nat (inside) 9 GiancarloPC 255.255.255.255
nat (inside) 9 WilliamsPC 255.255.255.255
nat (inside) 9 PerniaPC 255.255.255.255
nat (inside) 9 ElvisDomPC 255.255.255.255
nat (inside) 8 LBermudezPC 255.255.255.255
nat (inside) 9 HelpDeskPC 255.255.255.255
nat (inside) 9 OscarOPC 255.255.255.255
nat (inside) 9 AnaPC 255.255.255.255
nat (inside) 9 RobertoPC 255.255.255.255
nat (inside) 9 MarthaPC 255.255.255.255
nat (inside) 9 NOCPc5-I 255.255.255.255
nat (inside) 9 NOCPc6-I 255.255.255.255
nat (inside) 9 CiraPC 255.255.255.255
nat (inside) 9 JaimePC 255.255.255.255
nat (inside) 9 EugemarPC 255.255.255.255
nat (inside) 9 JosePC 255.255.255.255
nat (inside) 9 RixioPC 255.255.255.255
nat (inside) 9 DaniellePC 255.255.255.255
nat (inside) 9 NorimarPC 255.255.255.255
nat (inside) 9 NNavaPC 255.255.255.255
nat (inside) 8 ManriquePC 255.255.255.255
nat (inside) 8 MarcialPC 255.255.255.255
nat (inside) 8 JAlbornozPC 255.255.255.255
nat (inside) 9 GUrdanetaPC 255.255.255.255
nat (inside) 9 RVegaPC 255.255.255.255
nat (inside) 9 LLabarcaPC 255.255.255.255
nat (inside) 9 Torondoy-I 255.255.255.255
nat (inside) 9 Escuque-I 255.255.255.255
nat (inside) 9 Turbio-I 255.255.255.255
nat (inside) 9 JoseMora 255.255.255.255
nat (inside) 8 San-Juan-I 255.255.255.255
nat (inside) 8 Router7507 255.255.255.255
nat (inside) 8 NOCPc4-I 255.255.255.255
nat (InterfaceSAN) 8 MonitorHITACHI-I 255.255.255.255

VPN-Client V 5.0 under Windows Vista Home Premium - Error for Installation

Hello
I hope you can help me. During installating the VPN-Client I recieve the Error 1609: Users ist not a unser...
One message says that I creat new usergroups. Unfortunately this ist not possible under Vista Home Premium.
Is there a solution, how I can install VPN?
Thanks for your help.
Best regards
Pascal

Try installing the 5.0.00.0340 client version
also see the details of this bug CSCsj89801

Problem with Oracle Client(64 bit) install on Windows 7

Hi,
I am trying to install Oracle Client 64 bit (win64_11gR2_client) on my laptop and its giving me all the pre requisite failed for "Physical Memory, Free Space, Architecture and Enviornment variable: Path". So i need to exit that setup.
I have enough space almost 130 GB free on my laptop. Also, i cleared temp data. Then increased physical memory to 4096 MB but still facing the same error and not able to install the Oracle Client on my laptop.
Please assist as soon as possible.
-Parth

Pl identify exact version of Win 7 - you will need Professional version or higher - Home versions are not supported. Pl verify you meet all of the pre-reqs for the install as identified in the Install Guide - http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E11882_01/install.112/e16774/pre_install.htm
HTH
Srini

Problems with QuickVPN client

Hello,
I experiance problems with QuickVPN client (version 1.4.1.2). I'm trying to connect to router SA520 with 1.1.65 firmware,
vpn tunell is established, but client says "The remote gateway is not responding. Do you want to wait?"
in case i click no, it drops vpn tunell
QuickVPN client log looks like this:
2010/08/18 12:13:27 [STATUS]OS Version: Windows 7
2010/08/18 12:13:27 [STATUS]Windows Firewall Domain Profile Settings: ON
2010/08/18 12:13:27 [STATUS]Windows Firewall Private Profile Settings: ON
2010/08/18 12:13:27 [STATUS]Windows Firewall Private Profile Settings: ON
2010/08/18 12:13:27 [STATUS]One network interface detected with IP address 192.168.1.100
2010/08/18 12:13:27 [STATUS]Connecting...
2010/08/18 12:13:27 [DEBUG]Input VPN Server Address = vpn.in-volv.lv
2010/08/18 12:13:28 [STATUS]Connecting to remote gateway with IP address: 78.28.223.10
2010/08/18 12:13:28 [WARNING]Server's certificate doesn't exist on your local computer.
2010/08/18 12:13:30 [STATUS]Remote gateway was reached by https ...
2010/08/18 12:13:30 [STATUS]Provisioning...
2010/08/18 12:13:39 [STATUS]Success to connect.
2010/08/18 12:13:39 [STATUS]Tunnel is configured. Ping test is about to start.
2010/08/18 12:13:39 [STATUS]Verifying Network...
2010/08/18 12:13:44 [WARNING]Failed to ping remote VPN Router!
2010/08/18 12:13:47 [WARNING]Failed to ping remote VPN Router!
2010/08/18 12:13:50 [WARNING]Failed to ping remote VPN Router!
2010/08/18 12:13:53 [WARNING]Failed to ping remote VPN Router!
2010/08/18 12:13:56 [WARNING]Failed to ping remote VPN Router!
2010/08/18 12:14:08 [WARNING]Ping was blocked, which can be caused by an unexpected disconnect.
2010/08/18 12:14:12 [STATUS]Disconnecting...
2010/08/18 12:14:15 [STATUS]Success to disconnect.
Server logs look like this:
2010-08-18 12:28:49: INFO: Adding IPSec configuration with identifier "arvils"
2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO: Configuration found for 83.243.93.200[500].
2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO: Received request for new phase 1 negotiation: 78.28.223.10[500]<=>83.243.93.200[500]
2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO: Beginning Identity Protection mode.
2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO: Received Vendor ID: MS NT5 ISAKMPOAKLEY
2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO: Received Vendor ID: RFC 3947
2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO: Received Vendor ID: draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02
2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO: For 83.243.93.200[500], Selected NAT-T version: RFC 3947
2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO: NAT-D payload matches for 78.28.223.10[500]
2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO: NAT-D payload does not match for 83.243.93.200[500]
2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO: NAT detected: PEER
2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO: Floating ports for NAT-T with peer 83.243.93.200[4500]
2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO: ISAKMP-SA established for 78.28.223.10[4500]-83.243.93.200[4500] with spi:e2cd855a75fc0887:6dc3b2e025152444
2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO: Sending Informational Exchange: notify payload[INITIAL-CONTACT]
2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO: Responding to new phase 2 negotiation: 78.28.223.10[0]<=>83.243.93.200[0]
2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO: Using IPsec SA configuration: 192.168.75.0/24<->192.168.1.100/32
2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO: Adjusting peer's encmode 3(3)->Tunnel(1)
2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO: IPsec-SA established[UDP encap 4500->4500]: ESP/Tunnel 83.243.93.200->78.28.223.10 with spi=47693803(0x2d7bfeb)
2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO: IPsec-SA established[UDP encap 4500->4500]: ESP/Tunnel 78.28.223.10->83.243.93.200 with spi=1079189482(0x40531fea)
2010-08-18 12:35:57: INFO: an undead schedule has been deleted: 'pk_recvupdate'.
2010-08-18 12:35:57: INFO: Purged IPsec-SA with proto_id=ESP and spi=1079189482(0x40531fea).
2010-08-18 12:40:46: INFO: Configuration found for 83.243.93.200[500].
2010-08-18 12:40:46: INFO: Received request for new phase 1 negotiation: 78.28.223.10[500]<=>83.243.93.200[500]
2010-08-18 12:40:46: INFO: Beginning Identity Protection mode.
2010-08-18 12:40:46: INFO: Received Vendor ID: MS NT5 ISAKMPOAKLEY
2010-08-18 12:40:46: INFO: Received Vendor ID: RFC 3947
2010-08-18 12:40:46: INFO: Received Vendor ID: draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02
2010-08-18 12:40:46: INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2010-08-18 12:40:46: INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2010-08-18 12:40:46: INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2010-08-18 12:40:46: INFO: For 83.243.93.200[500], Selected NAT-T version: RFC 3947
2010-08-18 12:40:46: INFO: NAT-D payload matches for 78.28.223.10[500]
2010-08-18 12:40:46: INFO: NAT-D payload does not match for 83.243.93.200[500]
2010-08-18 12:40:46: INFO: NAT detected: PEER
2010-08-18 12:40:46: INFO: Floating ports for NAT-T with peer 83.243.93.200[4500]
2010-08-18 12:40:46: INFO: ISAKMP-SA established for 78.28.223.10[4500]-83.243.93.200[4500] with spi:28447d39874689f9:a2b7da19d8d86413
2010-08-18 12:40:46: INFO: Responding to new phase 2 negotiation: 78.28.223.10[0]<=>83.243.93.200[0]
2010-08-18 12:40:46: INFO: Using IPsec SA configuration: 192.168.75.0/24<->192.168.1.100/32
2010-08-18 12:40:46: INFO: Adjusting peer's encmode 3(3)->Tunnel(1)
2010-08-18 12:40:47: INFO: IPsec-SA established[UDP encap 4500->4500]: ESP/Tunnel 83.243.93.200->78.28.223.10 with spi=259246202(0xf73c87a)
2010-08-18 12:40:47: INFO: IPsec-SA established[UDP encap 4500->4500]: ESP/Tunnel 78.28.223.10->83.243.93.200 with spi=3642234214(0xd9181566)
2010-08-18 12:43:27: INFO: IPsec-SA expired: ESP/Tunnel 83.243.93.200->78.28.223.10 with spi=33356156(0x1fcf97c)
2010-08-18 12:45:47: INFO: an undead schedule has been deleted: 'pk_recvupdate'.
2010-08-18 12:45:47: INFO: Purged IPsec-SA with proto_id=ESP and spi=3642234214(0xd9181566).
The most interesting thing is that sometimes this message appears, sometimes not (with the same configuration).
Please help!

Hi,
I have some problem. I am using Windows 7 Entreprice x64. I use SA520 Firmware 1.1.65 and QuickVPN 1.4.1.2 port 60443.
"The remote gateway is not responding. Do you want to wait"
2010-08-18 17:25:51: INFO: Adding IPSec configuration with identifier "username"
2010-08-18 17:25:51: INFO: Adding IKE configuration with identifer "username"
2010-08-18 17:26:04: INFO: Configuration found for xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx[235].
2010-08-18 17:26:04: INFO: Received request for new phase 1 negotiation: 172.22.5.10[500]<=>xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx[235]
2010-08-18 17:26:04: INFO: Beginning Identity Protection mode.
2010-08-18 17:26:04: INFO: Received Vendor ID: MS NT5 ISAKMPOAKLEY
2010-08-18 17:26:04: INFO: Received Vendor ID: RFC 3947
2010-08-18 17:26:04: INFO: Received Vendor ID: draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02
2010-08-18 17:26:04: INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2010-08-18 17:26:04: INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2010-08-18 17:26:04: INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2010-08-18 17:26:04: INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2010-08-18 17:26:04: INFO: For xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx[235], Selected NAT-T version: RFC 3947
2010-08-18 17:26:04: INFO: NAT-D payload does not match for 172.22.5.10[500]
2010-08-18 17:26:04: INFO: NAT-D payload does not match for xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx[235]
2010-08-18 17:26:04: INFO: NAT detected: ME PEER
2010-08-18 17:26:04: INFO: Floating ports for NAT-T with peer xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx[48540]
2010-08-18 17:26:04: INFO: ISAKMP-SA established for 172.22.5.10[4500]- xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx[48540] with spi:ed4f291c71c1b688:7e6a8a0968f878fb
2010-08-18 17:26:04: INFO: Sending Informational Exchange: notify payload[INITIAL-CONTACT]
2010-08-18 17:26:04: INFO: Responding to new phase 2 negotiation: 172.22.5.10[0]<=> xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx[0]
2010-08-18 17:26:04: INFO: Using IPsec SA configuration: 192.168.75.0/24<->192.168.170.224/32
2010-08-18 17:26:04: INFO: Adjusting peer's encmode 3(3)->Tunnel(1)
2010-08-18 17:26:05: INFO: IPsec-SA established[UDP encap 48540->4500]: ESP/Tunnel xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx->172.22.5.10 with spi=239099274(0xe405d8a)
2010-08-18 17:26:05: INFO: IPsec-SA established[UDP encap 4500->48540]: ESP/Tunnel 172.22.5.10-> xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx with spi=3886848189(0xe7ac98bd)
2010-08-18 17:26:07: INFO: Configuration found for xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx[235].
2010-08-18 17:26:07: INFO: Received request for new phase 1 negotiation: 172.22.5.10[500]<=> xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx[235]
2010-08-18 17:26:07: INFO: Beginning Identity Protection mode.
2010-08-18 17:26:07: INFO: Received Vendor ID: MS NT5 ISAKMPOAKLEY
2010-08-18 17:26:07: INFO: Received Vendor ID: RFC 3947
2010-08-18 17:26:07: INFO: Received Vendor ID: draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02
2010-08-18 17:26:07: INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2010-08-18 17:26:07: INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2010-08-18 17:26:07: INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2010-08-18 17:26:07: INFO: For xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx[235], Selected NAT-T version: RFC 3947
2010-08-18 17:26:07: INFO: NAT-D payload does not match for 172.22.5.10[500]
2010-08-18 17:26:07: INFO: NAT-D payload does not match for xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx[235]
2010-08-18 17:26:07: INFO: NAT detected: ME PEER
2010-08-18 17:26:07: INFO: Floating ports for NAT-T with peer xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx[48540]
2010-08-18 17:26:07: INFO: ISAKMP-SA established for 172.22.5.10[4500]- xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx[48540] with spi:699f34b434d4318c:df4adca414787d36
2010-08-18 17:27:14: INFO: Purged ISAKMP-SA with proto_id=ISAKMP and spi=699f34b434d4318c:df4adca414787d36.
2010-08-18 17:27:14: INFO: Configuration found for xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx[235].
2010-08-18 17:27:14: INFO: Received request for new phase 1 negotiation: 172.22.5.10[500]<=> xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx[235]
2010-08-18 17:27:14: INFO: Beginning Identity Protection mode.
2010-08-18 17:27:14: INFO: Received Vendor ID: MS NT5 ISAKMPOAKLEY
2010-08-18 17:27:14: INFO: Received Vendor ID: RFC 3947
2010-08-18 17:27:14: INFO: Received Vendor ID: draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02
2010-08-18 17:27:14: INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2010-08-18 17:27:14: INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2010-08-18 17:27:14: INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2010-08-18 17:27:14: INFO: For xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx[235], Selected NAT-T version: RFC 3947
2010-08-18 17:27:14: INFO: NAT-D payload does not match for 172.22.5.10[500]
2010-08-18 17:27:14: INFO: NAT-D payload does not match for xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx[235]
2010-08-18 17:27:14: INFO: NAT detected: ME PEER
2010-08-18 17:27:15: INFO: ISAKMP-SA deleted for 172.22.5.10[4500]- xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx[48540] with spi:699f34b434d4318c:df4adca414787d36
2010-08-18 17:27:15: INFO: Floating ports for NAT-T with peer xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx[48540]
2010-08-18 17:27:15: INFO: ISAKMP-SA established for 172.22.5.10[4500]- xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx[48540] with spi:3fe5eb0bddbf2b9a:f5c11d7f813ca74a
2010-08-18 17:27:15: INFO: Sending Informational Exchange: notify payload[INITIAL-CONTACT]
2010-08-18 17:28:20: INFO: Purged ISAKMP-SA with proto_id=ISAKMP and spi=3fe5eb0bddbf2b9a:f5c11d7f813ca74a.
2010-08-18 17:28:21: INFO: ISAKMP-SA deleted for 172.22.5.10[4500]- xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx[48540] with spi:3fe5eb0bddbf2b9a:f5c11d7f813ca74a
With windows XP Pro i dont have this problem.
Is there a detailed configuration guide?
10x

Problem with Variable Client Support

Hello,
I work with Labview 8.5 and Crio 9014.
I have a problem with Variable Client Support. When I try to compile my project I have the following error:
"The Network Variable Engine and Variable Client Support must be installed on the RT target for this application to function properly..."
I have read that we have to install the Variable Client Support in Measurement and Automation by right-clicking on the software and then choosing add/remove software but I can't install the appropriate shared variable components because I can't see neither Network Variable Engine and Variable Client Support. So what can I do?
Can somebody help me?
Thanks

I have exactly the same problem. I wanted go through the "Getting Started with the LabVIEW RT module" and when I use wizard for generating new project I get same notification in my VI...
The Network Variable Engine and Variable Client Support must be installed on the RT target
for this application to function properly. If the Network Variable Engine is not supported on
the target (e.g. FP-2000 with <32MB of RAM), open the project and move the variable library
to My Computer in the project. Doing this will deploy the variables to localhost but
will still require that Variable Client Support be installed on the RT target.
Could someone help please ?
Attachments:
ni.png ‏95 KB

We encountered a problem with some client machines that use Firefox version 24ESR and IE8. Ajax requests of aspx pages from Firefox are getting the following er

I encountered a problem with some client machines that use Firefox version 24ESR and IE8.
Ajax requests of aspx pages from Firefox are getting the following error from the iis server (iis version 7.5):
Bad Request - Request Too Long
HTTP Error 400. The size of the request headers is too long.
From analyzing the request that was sent to the server, I saw that the request consist of only the viewstate of the aspx page.
I tried to disable the viewstate for one page and the server got the request correctly.
I do not encounter any issues on these laptops with postback requests from Firefox or when running the same application with IE8.

Sometimes that means that the page address sent is loo long.
Check the link address you are using.
I can't help you further and will send for more help.

After upgrading on ios 6 i have problems with vpn connection..pls help if someone have the same problem

problem with vpn connection after upgrading on ios6.pls help

I've never been able to share FaceBook posts nor seen the option using the iOS FaceBook app regardless the FaceBook app and iOS version. I can Like and I can Comment, and if I select a link or video to view under iOS 6, I can use the Share option for the link or video, but not for a post.

Problem with line items print in Script MAIN window.

Dear Friends,
I am facing a problem with display the line items in main window.
Here i have created my form with 2 pages,
in first page i have created header window(my header information is full length of page), in second page i have created 2 windows, one for MAIN window and second for FOOTER window,
i am having the Footer information about to off the page.
and in my main window total 3 line items are coming, if i am having 3 line items then it is displaying properly (first 3 line items then immediately footer information on same page) but if am having more then 3 line items say four, then in my second page first it is printing 3 line items then it is switching into another page. After that footer is coming but. in previous page after printing 3 line items the remaining page is empty..
my client want me to remove that place also. he wants to display continue..
i think so u people r understand what is my problem...pls advice me what i want to do to solve this problem.
Thanks
Sridhar.

Hi Sridher,
If you want to display the footer information only on the last page why dont you use a table to display your details and place the footer details in the table footer instead of a seperate footer window.
Regards,
Vidya.

Problems with your HP printer after upgrading to Windows 8.1

If you are experiencing problems with your HP printer after upgrading to Windows 8.1 please click on the below link and install the HP Print and Scan Doctor and run the utility to fix the issue.
www.hp.com/go/tools.
I was an HP employee
If I have helped you solve your issue please mark it as solved
**Say Thanks By Clicking on the Kudos Star**

Hi.....my laserjet 1536dnf mfp was working perfectly with win 8 pro....then I installed win 8.1 pro and now the computer ,which is part of a network,can not communicate with the scanner of the printer--it prints just fine. On another computer (running win 7 ) on the same network, the scanner and all other printer functions work just fine.
I have tried installing the latest drivers from HP......scanner still not "communicating" with computer.....also temporarily disabled firewall.....please help...all the best -David G (gossat)

Problem with Oracle 11g(32 bit) installation on windows 7 ultimate edition

Hello all,
I have a problem with Oracle 11g(32 bit) installation on windows 7 ultimate edition (32 bit).
I have successfully installed it immediately after OS installation. But today, i have decided to deinstall it and go for Oracle 10g version for 32 bit.
Everything went normal during installation, but i can see the services is not present in services.msc. Also its throwing some exception for dbca, netca
Now i tried to deinstall it and again go for 11g. But even the same story here..
Can anybody give me a solution for this..
-Regards
Rajesh Menon

Saqib Alam wrote:
i recently install Oracle 11g R1 on windows 7 ultimate, i installed it and working perfectly.
ur problem is that u install latest version and now u trying to installing old version.
now u need to uninstall 10g and delete oracle from services, if the probleme presist then u should
install fresh windows 7.
Regards
SaqibNo need to install a fresh OS. That's like tearing your house down just because you wired a lamp wrong and blew a circuit breaker.
There are MeaLink notes on how to eradicate an Oracle install from Windows, but it boils down to this:
Stop all Oracle services
In the registery:
- Delete all oracle services from the register (HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet
- Delete the entire Oralce folder from HKLM\Software
reboot
Delete the ORACLE_HOME directory and any other Oracle related directories/files. Offhand, it seems like there is an Oracle directory under Program Files.
reboot

Problems with VPN-Client 5.0 instoled on Windows Vista over ADSL Conecction

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for