Purchase Order price not pulled through from Purchase Requisition.

Hi:
The Valuation Price on my Purchase Requisition does not pull through to the Purchase Order.
All the settings on "OMET" and my user profile seems to be set but still I get an error - No conditions determined (no authorization for input)
when I enter a tax code on the PO.
All my other authorizations are also okay.
What can the problem be.
Thanks.
W.

Maybe you should explain all steps YOU have done, instead of saying "yes I have done that", As this function works for many many companies without any problem, it is either an issue with your enties, or it is a bug in the programs.
For a bug, you should search OSS notes and open a message to SAP if you cant find one that solves your issue.
the authorization part of this message relates to the functional authorization, and cannot be seen in SU53.
The error is issued in these 4 cases:
   IF t160d-erfin EQ space AND ekpo-repos NE space.
      MESSAGE e235.
IF t160d-eprsz EQ space AND ekpo-repos NE space.
      MESSAGE e235.
IF ekpo-netpr EQ 0 AND ekpo-repos NE space.
and
    IF t160d-erfin EQ space.
      MESSAGE e235.
   IF ekpo-netpr EQ 0 AND ekpo-repos NE space.
and
    IF t160d-eprsz EQ space.
      MESSAGE e235.
so you only need to provide the values of following fields:
T160d-ERFIN
T160D-EPRSZ
EKPO-REPOS
EKPO-NETPR
Edited by: Jürgen L. on Jan 24, 2012 1:11 PM

Similar Messages

QM Notification: task end dates not pulled through from response profile

Hello,
I am experiencing a problem with the end dates of the tasks in QM notifications not pulling through (from the response profile) when tasks are determined.
When I do the simulation of task determination, the gantt chart shows all the tasks together with the end dates. But when the actual determination is done these dates are not populated in the planned finish date fields.
I have double checked the configuration: priorities, response and service profiles are set up correctly. I have also searched SAP notes without success.
I thank you in advance for your responses.
Kind regards,
Theo.

Yes, I know, but as far as I understand binding the values back from rule to the workflow is something that doesn't work. I have never tried it, but I have seen posts here about people complaining that this kind of binding does not work.
Have you tried to bind for example some hard coded value back to the workflow (something that should definately work)? Does it work? If not, I suggest you to ask this from SAP that is it supposed to work and if not, why do they have this option to for binding from rule to workflow. Or then just forget what you are trying, and use some of the suggested workarounds.
Regards,
Karri

SAP MM Purchase Order custom field pulling through to FI

Hi
I have no idea where to start. I need to create a custom field in the Purchase order which has to pull through to FI. I've created an Account Assignment category I - Insurance and need to have a field on the Purchase order where the users can fill in the Claim Number. (Reference field).
I thought I could maybe use the Unloading point field as we don't use it currently, but it doesn't pull through to reports on FI.
Secondly I would like to link my Account assignment category to a specific General Ledger account (when the user choses Aac I, I would like a G/L to automatically populate and be grey (no changes possible)
Thanks so much!
Carina

I Actually think I found the answer here - http://www.bluemarlinsys.com/ns/0603-03.asp
1) How to default a General Ledger account on a Purchase Order account assignment for an inventory item?
When you create a standard Purchase Order using ‘K’ account assignment to expense an inventory item with GL account and cost center, the system expects you to key in GL account number and the cost center. In case you don’t want to use the account modification ‘VBR’ assigned GL account number, it is possible to default a separate GL account with standard configuration steps.
a) Transaction: OME9 (Maintain account assignment categories)
Create a new account assignment category ‘Z’ by making a copy of account assignment category ‘K’. Change account modification to ‘ZBR’.
b) Transaction: OMGO (Define combination of item categories/account assignment categories)
Assign account assignment category created in previous step to an item category blank or space.
Note:
This is an optional step, if you don’t want to touch the standard ‘K’ cost center account assignment.
c) Transaction: OBYC (Automatic account assignment configuration)
Choose account transaction key ‘GBB’ by double clicking the existing entry and choose the appropriate chart of account for your company. Assign the GL account that needs to be defaulted for general modification ‘ZBR’ and valuation class ‘RAW’ (use appropriate valuation class set-up in your company).
d) Transaction: ME21N to create a purchase order to test the configuration.
When you create a PO with account assignment ‘Z’ for an inventory item, the system should default the above-configured GL account.
2) How to default a GL account for a material group when a purchase order is created without a material master?
If you want to create a purchase order without a material master (service/expense items), the standard SAP R/3 4.x and higher releases, offer functionality to assign a valuation class to a material group. This way automatic MM account assignment can be set-up to drive the appropriate GL account for a material group/valuation class in your company.
a) Transaction: OMSK (Define valuation class):
b) Transaction: OMQM (Entry aids for items without a material master):
Assign the appropriate valuation class for a material group.
c) Transaction: OME9 (Maintain account assignment categories)
Create a new account assignment category ‘Z’ by making a copy of account assignment category ‘K’. Change account modification to ‘ZBR’.
d) Transaction: OMGO (Define the combination of item categories/account assignment categories)
Assign the account assignment category created in previous step to an item category blank or space.
Note:
This is an optional step if you don’t want to touch the standard ‘K’ cost center account assignment.
e) Transaction: OBYC: (Automatic account assignment configuration)
Choose account transaction key ‘GBB’ by double clicking the existing entry and choose appropriate chart of account for your company. Assign the GL account that needs to be defaulted for general modification ‘ZBR’ and valuation class ‘TRF’ (use the appropriate valuation class set-up in your company).
f) Transaction: ME21N to create a purchase order to test the configuration.
Standard order type, Account assignment category ‘Z’ and Material Group ‘TRAFFIC’.
Account assignment screen:
Note:
Before configuring account assignment, please discuss this with your SAP FI/CO functional contact and Accounting department key user for mapping valuation class to General ledger account numbers etc.
Some of my colleagues in MM Purchasing liked this configuration and I thought your company might also benefit from this in case you want to default the GL account in purchasing to avoid wrong account coding.

"SUS Purchase Orders" are not being extracted from SRM to BW

I'm usign BW 7.0 with SRM 5.0 (EBP and SUS).
"SUS Purchase Orders" (BUS2230) are not being extracted from SRM to BW, only "Purchase Orders" (BUS2201). I'm using standard SRM extractor 0BBP_TD_PO.
Does anyone have experieced this? Is there any special configuration to extract "SUS Purchase Orders"?
Thanks in advance
Raphael Barboza

The only solution we were able to provide with the time constraint we had was to modify the standard extractor to consider the SUS PO code instead of the PO code.
Function module: BBP_BI_PO_EXTRACT
Replace line:
c_object_type TYPE bbp_object_type VALUE c_po, u201CBUS2201
With the line:
c_object_type TYPE bbp_object_type VALUE c_suspo, u201CBUS2230
It is not the most elegant solution, but it worked.
Hope it helps.

Assembley Processing Sales Order date not pulling through as finished date

Hi
I have a small issue. We are using Assembley Processing in SAP where the Sales Order creates a Project / WBS / NEtwork Order automatically.
If I look on the network order there is a clear link between the order and Sales Order and it also has the requested delievery date in there which is correct however the network order finish date is completley wrong.
The scheduling settings are backwards and lets say the delievery date is 01.04.2011 and and it takes 1 month to finish the project therefore it should start on the 01.03.2011 yet the finish date in the Network Order is way in the future. E.g. it is starting on the 01.05.2011 and finishing on the 01.06.2011 which is wrong.
It seems like it isn't even considering or looking at the customer delievery date.
Regards
Adeel

Dear, I am aware of this
And there is no point doing it manually or there is no point using Assembly Processing.
But why i asked you to schedule the network manually, is to find where the problem really lies. If you are able to schedule the network manually and derive the result as desired, then you can conclude that nothing wrong in network scheduling and its parameter and the problem would be the flow of date from SO to network.

Previous Purchase Order Price

While creating Purchase order, if i need to see the Previous Purchase order Price for the material, From where i have to see?

Hi
Prompt the last Purchase Order Price for the Material
If you want the system to take the price from the last Purchase Order, then do not maintain the conditions in the info record because it has precedence over the last PO. This means that the net price field in the info record should be left blank.
Even though no price was maintained, the info record will still keep track of the Order price history.
To check the Order price history, go into the material info record and click Environment -> Order price history
Regards
Anand

Org Charts not pulling through complete internal order numbers

Hi Team
Can u please help me to overcome my issue
Here is my issue -
Can someone please investigate this issue - the internal orders are not pulling through to the Org Charts correctly.
As per this screen shot, Michelle Morgan is on internal order 4000035.
However as per this next screen shot, this information is not pulling through completely (it is only showing 40000).
I.e one employee the cost centre / Internal order on R3 is showing as one number and on portal it is shown as a different one

The only reason to resettle the orders is that the "settlement rules" were revised in the current fiscal year . In the current fiscal year , the settlements for each settled period (closed period) are reversed and then resettled in the current open period using the revised settlement rules. However, the issue involves these same orders had costs in the previous fiscal year and were settled originally in that previous fiscal year with the old settlement rules. This is a closed fiscal year and all periods are closed.
Any thoughts on a system approach to effect the settlement rule change crossing two fiscal years rather than manual entries for prior fiscal year settlement rule impact as a two step process the first step being the current fiscal year resettlements and the second step the manual entry for previous year impact ?

Purchase order contains an order price unit that differs from the order uni

Purchase order contains an order price unit that differs from the order unit
Treatment at the time of "Goods Receipt" so that the stock maintained in Kg and at the same time the purcahse order unit is also to be entered at the time of GR.

the purchase requisition has your valuation, this is not the price you have with your vendor.
The valuation in the PR, is automatically copied from material master, dependend on the price control, it is either the moving average or the standard price, the valuation of your current stock. If MAP then this valuation was calculated by historic stock values and receipts from maybe several vendors.
the valuation is mainly used for the release procedure.

Purchase Order Response Not able to do by the Supplier from SUS

Hi Experts,
During sometimes, the supplier is not in a position to make POR from SUS.
After selecting the PO from Supplier side, when they are trying to do POR they are not able to either select Confirm (tick mark) or reject (X mark) from their screen which means always those buttons are in greyed mode or no action like Green or Red respectively. What could be the reason ? However, they can see the Send button.
Please provide me the input to do investigation.
Thanks
Rajesh K

Hi Rajesh,
   If you are not able to respond for PO from SUS then you have to activate the workflow WS14500001.. Here some more workflows you can check for POR
Workflows
You can configure the following workflows for the purchase order response:
·        (WS14500001)
Automatic transfer of purchase order response data into the purchase order. The system carries out a comparison during the data transfer (background processing). If the quantity, price, and delivery date variances transmitted by the vendor are within the tolerance limits set in Customizing, and no other variances are transmitted, then the data transfer of the first inbound POR occurs automatically.
This workflow is relevant for XML receipt or manual entry with subsequent approval.
·        (WS14500019)
If POR data differs from that in the purchase order, you can be informed of this via a work item. As a purchaser, you can decide for each item whether you wish to transfer the data into the purchase order or not.
·        (WS14500007)
If POR data differs from that in the purchase order, you can be informed of this via e-mail (with the number of the purchase order).
·        (WS14500017)
Monitoring receipt of the purchase order response:
If the flag Purchase order response expected is set in the purchase order, and if by a certain time a purchase order response has not been received for all items in a purchase order, then you can be informed of this via a work item.
SAP WON'T DELIVER ANY WF TEMPLATE WITH NUMBER RANGE OF '9' BECAUSE 99% CUSTOMER USE NUMBER RANGE 9' FOR CUSTOM WORKFLOW..
Saravanan

Purchase requsition and Purchase order Price Changes

Hi All,
When purchase requsition(XXXXXXXX) is converted in to a purchase order through ME 59N(YYYYYYYYYY),after converting in to a purchase order i will change the purchase order price to a new value.
How can i track the price changes for a purchase order that is converted from a purchase requsition.(i know i can see the changes to a PO,under item changes for PO)
Is this data is stored in any table?
with regards,
Amogh

Hi,
this change is not captured, because the price is being changed at the point of the PO creation and so there will be no record in the header or item changes option (the system does not see anything as being changed because this is a creation of a new PO).
The price from the requisition is merely a suggestion and it is not meant to be a purchase price anyway (it is designed to be used to value the requisition for the release strategy).
I know that you can configure the system to pass this req "price" to the PO, but it is not the same price and so you will not find the type of controls that you would expect.
In many cases a simple ABAP is written that reads POs that have a reference requisition and the ABAP compares the prices and reports on those that exceed a tolerance (either hard coded in the program or held on a new table in SAP).
None of this is standard SAP but it is something that many people create to handle the situation where the user enters the requisition at a deliberately low value to get it through the release strategy.
Steve B

Purchase Order: Price adopition

Hi all,
I need help on the customizing of SAP MM.
Problem: I need to copy the price of the Purchase Requisition on the field price of the Purchase Order
I have seen that in the transaction SPRO in Material Management - Purchasing - Environment Data - Define Default Values for Buyers there is a pop up. If I choose Settings for Default Values there are some tabs.
In the tab Price Adoption I can only copy the price of the last purchase order and not the price of the purchase request related at the order that I'm creating.
How can I copy the price (of any position) of the Purchase Request?
I need this beacause the price of the Purchase Request is the price that is authorized.
Thanks,
Best Regards
Andrea

Hi Andrea,
The price on the PR may or may not be the purchase price. The price on the PR is called the "Valuation Price", which is taken from the Material Master (Accounting View 1).
The price for the PO is taken from the Purchasing Information Record, if Purch Org and/or Plant level prices exists (otherwise, from the last PO price for the material).
To fulfill your need, you will need to maintain the Purchasing Information Record (ME12) for the material and vendor concerned. Here, you will maintain the price that matches the valuation price. Please note that prices can be maintained both at Purch Org level and Plant level (based on your price control settings in IMG).
Let me know if this helped.
Mewan

MIGO error 'Purchase Order does not contain a confirmation control key'

Hi,
while posting GR to a PO i am getting an error ' Purchase order XXXXXXXXX does not contain a confirmation control key'
it is true that i have not defined any confirmation control key in PO, Aknowled rerd checkbox is also not ticked
Still why this message coming, what setting would be bringing this message
Please clarity

Hi,
Until the installation of Note 589422 (with SP SAPKH46C43) you could due to a program error - create a delivery even though the purchase order did not contain any confirmation control key.
This is now prevented through error message M7394. The transfer of this check (Confirmation control key existing in the purchase order, see Note 589422) was necessary as otherwise you could post a purchase order as desired. (Refer to also Note 616944 -> SAPKH46C44)
589422 Several inbound deliveries can be created with MIGO :
"Implement the program correction.
With Transaction SE91 create message M7394 with the message text:
Purchase order & & does not contain a confirmation control key".
After you implemented this correction, when you want to create an
inbound delivery with Transaction MB01 or MIGO or with
BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE and if the purchase order does not contain a
confirmation control key the system displays error message M7394
"Purchase order & & does not contain a confirmation control key".
Hope this can explain the error you met.
Regards,
Mauro

Purchase order yet not released

Hi sap gurus,
i have done purchse order .then i am creating goods receipt for that purchase order but i am getting these error purchase order yet not released.plz tell me how can i solve these problem

Hi Prasad
Its simple prasad ur PO is suject to release strategy (Approval process) so the authorized person has to release the PO through the following process -
Just go to Transaction ME29N or ME28, enter ur PO no.
If u follow ME28 give ur release grp / code enetr PO no. and execute ur PO will be reflected in the list put the cursor there and press Release+Save Iconit will release the PO and then u will able make the GR.
If u follow ME29N then give ur PO no. and go to release tab at the header level and press release icon.
Best regards
Vineet Baweja

Error of PO - "Purchase Order Does not exists"

Dear Experts,
Here i am facing one error of Purchase Order Creation and its further processing.
I have created purchase order and saved it, system issued message that, Purchase Order XYZ is created. (I have taken trial for 2-3 Purchase orders).
When, i am posting Goods Receipt for the PO, system is issuing the error message, Purchase Order does not exists.
Also in ME2M (PO list display) and Me23N (Display PO),
system is issuing the same message - Purchase Order Does not exists, but in PO Creation it is generating Purchase order normally.
Here is no matter of release strategy, because, PO release is not configured.
Dear Experts, Please guide me on the issue !
Thanks in advance !!!!

there can be hundred of different reason for a failure. Most common reason is a problem with the number ranges, e.g. system tries to create a record with a number that is already there.
This can happen if the number range was reset (or transported from a developement system).
But transaction SM13 gives you all the details.
There you see a line for each posting failure. Double click this line again to get more details.
There you will certainly find a line in red that indicates in which function the failure ocured.
Double click this red line to get more info. Use the buttons above to see the content of the posting. For some failures you can create a dump that gives you much more details.
Best you sit together with an ABAPer who can certainly tell you more how to read a dump and how to find the reason.

Document is in transfer for purchase order.Creation not possible

Dear All,
We did partial confirmation in EBP and later when trying to do confiramtion for the remaining quantiy getting the message"document is in transfer for purchase order.Creation not possible"
We are taking this problem in production as well as in quality systems also.
What are possible reason and how to solve it.
kindly share your views.
Thank you.

Hi yshu,
use tcode bd87 in SRM to check for failed confirmation IDOC (type MBGMCR).
The double click the status record to see the exact cause of the failure.
Rectify the error. Then try to execute the IDOC from BD87 tcode.
For a few errors you may not be able to execute the IDOC but to create a new confirmation in SRM. In such cases, follow the below procedure..
There should be an entry for the confirmation in the transfer table BBP_DOCUMENT_TAB in SRM. Display the details.
Then run FM "BBP_DELETE_FROM_DOCUMENT_TAB" to delete the entry from the doc tab table.
Then post a new confirmation in SRM.
There is also a FM in SRM using which you can change the status of thefailed IDOC from 51 to 68 or 31.
Rgds,
MJ

Purchase Order price not pulled through from Purchase Requisition.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for