QM Notification: task end dates not pulled through from response profile

Hello,
I am experiencing a problem with the end dates of the tasks in QM notifications not pulling through (from the response profile) when tasks are determined.
When I do the simulation of task determination, the gantt chart shows all the tasks together with the end dates. But when the actual determination is done these dates are not populated in the planned finish date fields.
I have double checked the configuration: priorities, response and service profiles are set up correctly. I have also searched SAP notes without success.
I thank you in advance for your responses.
Kind regards,
Theo.

Yes, I know, but as far as I understand binding the values back from rule to the workflow is something that doesn't work. I have never tried it, but I have seen posts here about people complaining that this kind of binding does not work.
Have you tried to bind for example some hard coded value back to the workflow (something that should definately work)? Does it work? If not, I suggest you to ask this from SAP that is it supposed to work and if not, why do they have this option to for binding from rule to workflow. Or then just forget what you are trying, and use some of the suggested workarounds.
Regards,
Karri

Similar Messages

  • Purchase Order price not pulled through from Purchase Requisition.

    Hi:
    The Valuation Price on my Purchase Requisition does not pull through to the Purchase Order.
    All the settings on "OMET" and my user profile seems to be set but still I get an error - No conditions determined (no authorization for input)
    when I enter a tax code on the PO.
    All my other authorizations are also okay.
    What can the problem be.
    Thanks.
    W.

    Maybe you should explain all steps YOU  have done, instead of saying "yes I have done that", As this function works for many many companies without any problem, it is either an issue with your enties, or it is a bug in the programs.
    For a bug, you should search OSS notes and open a message to SAP if you cant find one that solves your issue.
    the authorization part of this message relates to the functional authorization, and cannot be seen in SU53.
    The error is issued in these 4 cases:
       IF t160d-erfin EQ space AND ekpo-repos NE space.
          MESSAGE e235.
    IF t160d-eprsz EQ space AND ekpo-repos NE space.
          MESSAGE e235.
    IF ekpo-netpr EQ 0 AND ekpo-repos NE space.
    and
        IF t160d-erfin EQ space.
          MESSAGE e235.
       IF ekpo-netpr EQ 0 AND ekpo-repos NE space.
    and
        IF t160d-eprsz EQ space.
          MESSAGE e235.
    so you only need to provide the values of following fields:
    T160d-ERFIN
    T160D-EPRSZ
    EKPO-REPOS
    EKPO-NETPR
    Edited by: Jürgen L. on Jan 24, 2012 1:11 PM

  • Assembley Processing Sales Order date not pulling through as finished date

    Hi
    I have a small issue. We are using Assembley Processing in SAP where the Sales Order creates a Project / WBS / NEtwork Order automatically.
    If I look on the network order there is a clear link between the order and Sales Order and it also has the requested delievery date in there which is correct however the network order finish date is completley wrong.
    The scheduling settings are backwards and lets say the delievery date is 01.04.2011 and and it takes 1 month to finish the project therefore it should start on the 01.03.2011 yet the finish date in the Network Order is way in the future. E.g. it is starting on the 01.05.2011 and finishing on the 01.06.2011 which is wrong.
    It seems like it isn't even considering or looking at the customer delievery date.
    Regards
    Adeel

    Dear, I am aware of this
    And there is no point doing it manually or there is no point using Assembly Processing.
    But why i asked you to schedule the network manually, is to find where the problem really lies. If you are able to schedule the network manually and derive the result as desired, then you can conclude that nothing wrong in network scheduling and its parameter and the problem would be the flow of date from SO to network.

  • Resource task end date

    Hello
    We use Project Professional 2010.
    A resource does not want a project's tasks to show on his timecard.
    I have zeroed out his remaining work hours and changed the end date for his task, which always works.
    After I save & publish the project, the task end date reverts back to what it was before I changed it.
    Any suggestions what I should choose? We have "manually scheduled" checked.
    Thank you!

    Hi,
    First of all, you should not use manully scheduled tasks with resources for timesheeting purpose. It will cause unexpected behavior as you are experiencing. I'd suggest you to switch to automatic task mode and try again.
    That being said, have you changed the end date for the assignment itself from the task form/schedule? Are you sure there is no actual work in the future of the end date specified?
    Hope this helps,
    Guillaume Rouyre, MBA, MVP, MCP |

  • Required End date not allowed to change

    Hi  Gurus
    I want to change Notification Required end date but when i am trting to change system give the warnning message "required End date cant be change ,old date will be reset.
    This only happen with the Notfication in release Status..
    Regards

    Sandeep,
    You've used the word Warning. If it is so, why worry. You press Enter key and cross this. Your Date will be changed. If it is stopping you from Date change, then please specify at what instance it is stopping? Like when you are trying to Save? Clarify.
    KJogeswaraRao

  • Assignment feild is not pulling through to report FS10N

    Hi,
    When I run the FS10N and FBL3N, The assignment feild is not pulling through to report FS10N and FBL3N even though we select the assignment feild to be displayed(layout).If we double click on the line item the assignment feild value is appearing.
    We selected sort key as 040:Reference in GL master...
    Could you please anybody  help me by giving solution for this and what could be the problem..
    Thanks & Regards,
    Prakash

    Hi
    Thank you so much...
    I found the problem where it's going wrong..The problem is in GL master sortkey has been selected as 040(Reference), but user has not filled reference field, has filled assignment field.That is the reason system is not showing the value in assignment field, it has picked from the reference field.
    So now if we fill the reference field system will display the assignment value in FS10N..
    Now I want to get the existing assignment field values in FS10N,which have not been given in reference field.
    Is there any program to retrieve existing assignment values under assignment field in FS10N report?
    Could you please tell me..if any program is there...
    Thanks & Regards,
    Prakash

  • Data not Pulling after adding a 2nd Hierarchy in Account Dimension

    Hi all. We had 2 hierarchies in our account dimension. We were having some performance issues, so I wanted to test reporting performance by deleting the 2nd hierarchy. I deleted the second one and now I am ready to add it back again, but I am having the toughest time. After I added the 2nd hierarchy no data is pulling through any report and I am getting evdre errors. I checked sql db and the data is there. And then if I take out the 2nd hierarchy the reports work fine. I added multiple hierarchies to dimensions before , so I am quite baffled on why this is happening.  
    Here's what I did. Deleted column PARENTH2 and FORMULAH2. Process. Then did some testing. And now Added columns Parenth2 and formulah2. Process.
    Am I missing something here? Any suggestion will be greatly appreciated.
    We have SQL 2008 Enterprise sp2 CU3. BPC 7.5 MS SP3 patch5.

    I apologize for this very late response.
    Thanks for your response. Yes I did process the dimension, modify dimension property and modify-->Process Application. And the second hierarchy was visible when I logged back into the application.
    John, yes the second hierarchy was visible in SSAS.
    This was why it was baffling to me!
    So after a whole day of trying to figure this out, I sort of gave up and started working on something else. And because it was our test environment, it didnt have any effect on the users. One day later I logged back in and it was working! I took out the second hierarchy again and added it back. Processed, modified etc. I got the same result. I couldnt pull any data from the second hierarchy. I logged out, logged back in the day after and it started working. So, basically it seemed like the system needed some time (12-16 hours in this case) to adjust? I really don't know how/why this happened, maybe someone have an explanation for this?
    Thank you all.

  • Org Charts not pulling through complete internal order numbers

    Hi Team
    Can u please help me to overcome my issue
    Here is my issue -
    Can someone please investigate this issue - the internal orders are not pulling through to the Org Charts correctly.
    As per this screen shot, Michelle Morgan is on internal order 4000035.
    However as per this next screen shot, this information is not pulling through completely (it is only showing 40000).
    I.e  one employee the cost centre / Internal order on R3 is showing as one number and on portal it is shown as a different one

    The only reason to resettle the orders is that the "settlement rules" were revised in the current fiscal year .  In the current fiscal year , the settlements for each settled period (closed period) are reversed and then resettled in the current  open period using the revised settlement rules. However, the issue involves these same orders had costs in the previous fiscal year and were settled originally in that previous fiscal year with the old settlement rules. This is a closed fiscal year and all periods are closed.  
    Any thoughts on a system approach to effect the settlement rule change crossing two fiscal years rather than manual entries for prior fiscal year settlement rule impact as a  two step process the first step being the current fiscal year resettlements and the second step the manual entry for previous year impact ?

  • SQL Query to put end date to user account from Backend.

    We are using Oracle Apps 11.5.10.2. with oracle 9i Database.
    I want to put end date to user account who has left a week ago, (Responsibility ->Sysadmin - Go to : User)
    i cannot give the enddate as sysdate, i need to put the end date (25-JUN-09) from back end.
    I want a query so that the workflow tables also get updated accordingly.
    Regards,
    Jenny

    Yes i can give the back dated end date, but when i check the record history from Front end,
    (Help ---> Record History) These details are not updated , they will show the Updated By : username and Updated Date to sysdate and not the back dated date given.

  • Data not getting fetched from Quotation to Contract

    Hi,Myself new to TM. I have a ticket mentioning data not getting fetched from quotation to contract. How to solve it? Please help...
    Message was edited by: Michael Appleby

    Please add the version of the TM product and which SPs have been installed.  Also more information on the quotation and contract.
    What do you mean by ticket?  It you mean an error message, from where are you reading the message?
    Regards, Mike
    SAP Customer Experience Group - CEG

  • Rules facts not pulled through in Decision service

    Hi,
    I am using 10.1.3.1 SOA suite and JDev and have define a rule set with a singel fact.
    Using the decision service wizard, I can select the rule set from the file repository but no facts are pulled through to the wizard.
    This ultimately stops me assigning BPEL variables to rules facts.
    Has anyone got this working and if so, are there any steps I have missed?
    Thanks
    Joel.

    Anyone expierenced a DecisionService returning operationErroredFault?
    BPEL-instance Audit shows errorInfo-nde with text starting with:
    5}' when expecting one of: "fact" ...
    ends with
    at line 16 column 41 in main
    My experience is for those interested in achieving proper functioning of the Rules Author, the Import of XMLFacts, and the subsequent building of a BPEL process with a Decide-activity utilizing the Rules Engine.
    Until today I've used developer preview, but will now switch to 10.1.3.1.0 (SOA Suite and JDev build 3984 "production").
    The info in this forum thread has lead me pass some trouble, but not all:
    I can confirm that the rules engine xsd sample (driver-demo) doesn’t work with the Decide-wizard: The format of the xsd should be as described in this forum thread.
    There was one other situation in which "no Facts get pulled through" (symptom: you see an empty list of Facts in the Decide-wizard after choosing a named Ruleset).
    Cause: The JAXB-generated directories and files must be copied manually from the location specified in Rule Author when generated, and into your BPEL-project sub-directory bpel\\rules\*
    The copy-procedure is explained in the soa demo detailed tutorial (astut.pdf clause 8-10-10 page 8-87), but it's easy to miss. And if you do miss it, the wizard gives no specific clues (just a missing Facts list, same response as if the xsd filestructure is “non-supported”).
    I experienced also that it’s probably a good idea to Import XMFacts complete from the JAXB classes hierarchy, not just a selected sub-fact: Example from SOA demo, the ApproveOrderBooking.xsd:
    When making concrete Rules, you as author makes reference to a fact property or method that’s of type "ApproveType", in contrast to being a developer and choosing a Ruleset from BPEL Decide wizard when you pull through a Fact named "Approve" (not the "ApproveType", which is invisible in the wizard).
    On the other hand the XmlFact "Approve" in the Rule author is actually empty: Looking within the Author there is no clue as to why you should bother to import the "Approve"-fact: all the properties and methods used by rules are associated with the "ApproveType"-Fact.
    Further the instructions in astut.pdf is much needed to complete the assign-steps for a process to compile and deploy.
    Now the actual deployed DecisionService proved faulty when tested from a bpel-instance. It gives timeout and a payload showing:
    <ns0:errorInfo xmlns:ns0="http://xmlns.oracle.com/BPELProcessA/DecisionService" xmlns:env="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
    <ns0:errorMessage xmlns:env="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ns0="http://xmlns.oracle.com/BPELProcessA/DecisionService">
    5}' when expecting one of:
    "fact" ..."++" ..."--" ..."+" ..."-" ..."!" ..."exists" ..."(" ...<INT_LITERAL> ...<CHARACTER_LITERAL> ...<LONG_LITERAL> ...<FLOAT_LITERAL> ...<DOUBLE_LITERAL> ...<STRING_LITERAL> ..."true" ..."false" ..."null" ..."new" ...<XML_PACKAGE> ...<IDENTIFIER> ...<XML_IDENTIFIER> ...
    at line 16 column 41 in main
    </ns0:errorMessage>
    </ns0:errorInfo>
    Beats me: The logs within Enterprise Manager (http://server:8888/em) gives no clue...
    /CadB

  • EREC: work experience, make end date not mandatory, current employer flag?

    Hi,
    is there a way to make the end date of an external candidate's work experience NOT mandatory when the candidate is created by a recruiter?
    Here's the code that triggers the error message when the recruiter doesn't enter an end date:
    WD: ERC_C_CAND_EDU_WORKEXP_UI
    View : V_WORK_EXP_POP
    Method : ONACTIONOK
      IF lv_sdate IS NOT INITIAL AND lv_edate IS INITIAL.
        CALL METHOD lo_message_manager->raise_t100_error
          EXPORTING
            msgid = 'HRRCF0007'
            msgno = 110
            msgty = 'E'.
        RETURN.
      ENDIF.
    If there's no other way, I guess I will have to create an enhancement, but in the code I read about a "current employer flag", so it seems there might exist a better solution. Can a recruiter set the current employer flag somewhere to avoid entering an end date?
    Joë

    Hello Joel,
    The 'current employer flag' is the checkbox you can flag in the work experience maintenance. This flag means that the entry you are now creating is the last current one (which means your current employment). If you activate that checkbox the system automatically creates that entry with the high date as end date. So you only have to fill the start date but in your case that would not be successful as you would have only valid work experience entries then which could lead eg. to wrong results in the search scenarios and rankings.
    Regards
    Nicole

  • SRM 7.0 Ship to Address contact details not pulling through

    Hi all
    We are using SRM 7.0. We want users to choose the ship to address from a predefined list. I have added a new ship to address to an existing company. However when I add new contact details (telephone number, fax and email) it does not keep the new contact details. It still keeps the old contact details as standard. So when the requestor chooses the new ship to address, the old contact details are pulled through and not the new ones. How do I get the new contact details to pull through for the new address and the old contact details to remain for the old address.

    Hi
    did you crreate a new ship to address? or change the contact details of ship to address ?
    if you changed the ship to address . you must get updated address when you search.
    if you created new ship to address , you must get new ship to address when you search it.
    how did you change the ship to address ? - internal address?
    Muthu

  • End date different in timesheet from plan

    Hello All,
    We have a work plan that has fixed duration tasks that run from 11/18/2013 to 12/20/2013. The task is assigned to several resources and the planned work looks fine in the work plan. However, the start/end dates have shifted in some (not all) of the resources'
    timesheets to roughly a month later. none of the timesheets have been submitted so Im trying to "reset" them so that the planned work is the same as the work plan. Deleting and recreating the timesheet doesnt help.
    Can anyone suggest a method to resync the planned work from the work plan to the timesheet.
    We are using Project Server Sp1 + Dec 2013 CU
    Thanks,
    Shane
    Shane O'Hanlon (Accenture)

    Hi Shane,
    open your project in Project client and apply a usage view. Add column start. I assume, that dates are changed there. If %Complete = 0, yo can just reset start date on assignment level to start date of task. If %Complete is more than 0 or you have an ACtual
    start date for this assignment, it may be not good idea to reset, since your resource may already have time reported to this assignment.
    What do you see in usage view. Is it in sync with what you see in timesheet?
    Barbara
    To increase the value of this forum, please mark the replies that helped to solve your issue as answer. If you find answers to questions from other forum participants to be helpful, please mark them as helpful. Your participation will help others to find an
    appropriate solution faster.
    Thanks for your support!

  • Data not getting transffered from SRM system to BW

    Hi All,
    We have an issue where in the data is not getting transferred from SRM to BW. If i see in RSA 3 of SRM system, the datasource is pulling around 3000 records and in WE02, the idoc is generated and passed without any errors.
    Whereas in BW the idoc is coming with code 8 and no data is getting transferred to BW.
    What can be the probable reasons for this mismatch ??
    Thanks
    Abhi

    Hi Abhi,
    After an upgrade, i would go for following checks
    1. Check the Data Source on CRM side and check if it is Active.
    2. With Upgrade, usually DataSources become inactive and also, pls check if any required fields are hidden in the data source before you activate.
    3. After unhiding required fields, i would activate the Data Source and Replicate the Data Source on BI Side.
    4. Now I would delete the failed request by forcing its status to RED in RSMO and then go for the load.
    Let me know if it worked.

Maybe you are looking for