QM ? - Cost Center ? UD = Quantity for Sample for HUM goods ?

Hi everbody,
Can someone help me ? : I would like to know how to determine cost center in the following posting:
   Usage decision: Quantity for sample.
   Inspection lot origin: transfert order => no process order
   HU managed goods (HUM). (for non-HUM goods, a button is available to put the cost center)
I can not find a way to put the cost center.
Thank you in advance for your help.
Best regards,
Jean

Hi
In the same plant level you can maintain Cost center: Destroyed
It is nothing but sample Usage only
Reagrds
Sujit

Similar Messages

  • Default cost center not appearing for certain users

    Hi Gurus,
    We are on SRM 4.0 classic scenario.
    For certain users when they create SC in SRM the default cost center is not automatically taken into account even if they change it to it. The default cost center was changed for these users and some of them still refer to the old cost center no. which was maintained for them.
    The users are not defective and the except the cost center all other attributes work fine. I have tested by deleting & recreating new BP no. for the users but it still doesnt help. Please advise.
    BR,
    Sambit

    hi
    check if the users are correctly mapped into org structure (ppoma_bbp)
    than check if theri Position are correctly mapped with the default cost center (ppoma_bbp; tab attributes; cost center
    regards
    andrea

  • Archiving cost center line items for current period

    Hi,
    I was not able to archive & delete the cost center line items for current period.I was succesfull in deleting the past line items of the last periods.
    Raj

    Hi Rajesh,
    I think SAP help says that the period for which you are planning to delete or archive data may have to be locked.
    Check the following links:
    For Archiving
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/8d/3e55ec462a11d189000000e8323d3a/frameset.htm

  • Org Level, fund center/cost center level restriction for tcodes????

    I am looking to see whether org level restriction and cost center/fund center level restriction is possible for certain set of transactions.
    I am using USOBX table for this analysis. This table has a check flag field ( same as in SU24) which says whether the Tcode (program) does the authority check for certain auth objects. Example- X (checked but not maintained in USOBT). This table pulls up several authorization objects under the 'X' category. However, when I do the System trace for the same tcode, all the objects (marked as X) are not captured. Instead only a few are captured.
    Can we rely on the USOBX data or should we do system Trace for every tcode. I am just pulling a report and not creating roles at this point. So trace is time consuming. But data reliability is equally important.
    My objective is to verify whether org level and cost center/fund center level restriction is possible or not for some tcodes.
    Do you have any suggestion to achieve this faster (through USOBX or any other means)?
    Thanks in advance
    Kee

    I would suggest you to check USOBX_C and USOBT_C instead of USOBX and USOBT as it will have your customization as well and not just the standard ones given by SAP.
    Also when check field is X ...it means the object is checked but not maintained for the t-code as you already said but I am not sure how much it will help you as the they will not be pulled by PFCG when you are creating the role until you change the object to Check / maintain . When you do that the check field will be Y and not X. So basically it is the Y one which you need to see.
    Going for trace is time consuming for every t-code and I am not sure if it really needed. When your roles are in testing phase and are tested by the functional team or the team which needs it and if they are missing some object, you can run a trace and find the missing object....
    I am not sure on what basis you want to change some field to Org level ...but typically it is done if you want to do segregation of roles based on these org level. There could be various other reasons and it is better to talk to your functional counterparts before changing a field to Org level.
    for ex : If you want to segregate on company code, you will create co. code as Org level and create roles for different company code.

  • How to get the cost center and division for a given FI vendor document...

    Hello Experts,
    I am currently developing a report wherein I have to show the cost center and division used in the given FI document.
    These documents are vendor related transactions.
    In the file that was given to me by the user, she indicated the cost centers used by the FI documents
    but when I view it via VA03 I cannot theere are no cost centers used in all the line items.So are there
    any FM, BAPIs and/or tables that I can use for my requirement?
    Hope you can help me guys. Thank you and take care!

    Hi
    I am not sure on the requirement. You are developing a FI report and accessing VA03 which is sales transaction. Anyway for getting cost center you can go to table VBAK,VBAP for line items.
    Hope solves ur problem
    Thiru

  • KO88 - Error when settling for Cost Center AND Auc for the same Internal Or

    Hi Experts,
    We need to configure Investment Internal Orders that could settle to both Cost Center and Auc, but each assignments with different Source Cost Elements
    We did the following:
    1. Created Auc Class
    2. Created Investment Profile "IMOBIL" and assigned to Auc Class, flagging Auc
    3. Created Allocation Structure "CV" with two assignments:
    01, Source = Cost elements 7000000000 to 7999999999, receiver AUC "by cost element"
    02 Source = Cost elements 4000000000 to 4999999999, receiver CTR "by cost element"
    4. Created Model Order, filling the Investment Profile IMOBIL created in step 2.
    5 Created Settlement Profile ZCV0001, assigning Allocation Strucutre CV, allowing CTR and AUC for receivers, default receiver is "FXA", doc type "AA".
    6 Created ORder Type CV01, assigning Settlement Profile ZCV0001.
    When I post only for Asset Expenses (Source Cost element 7, Assigment 01), the settlement through KO88 correctly settles to AUC, and also creates the settlement rule for cost center (i'm using the strategy to create from Responsible Cost Center).
    But when I post for Asset Expenses (cost elements 7, receiver AUC) AND General Expenses (Source Cost element 4, receiver CTR), KO88 generates an error KD506, saying that for Assigment 02 - AUC I didnt define a settlement cost element.
    1. Assignment 02 is not AUC, is CTR;
    2. I flagged "by cost element", so I don't need a settlement cost element. And also, I was able to post to AUC when the source posting was only for cost element 7.
    Did you face any problem like this?
    I cannot find out what is the missing configuration, or if it is a program error...
    Kind Regards
    Mayumi Blak

    Hi Ajay
    I already created Source Structure and assigned to my Setllement profile (so I assigned Allocation Structure AND Source Structure).
    I don't understand when you say that I need to assign the Source Sutrcture in each rule....because the Source structure is in the Settlement Parameters valid for both rules...
    When I post to Asset Expenses only for the internal Order, the 2 rules (CTR and AUC) are created when I run KO88 (but only AUC rule is settled). This is OK.
    The problem is when I post for both General Expenses AND Asset Expenses, the system is not recognizing that I have 2 source structures, neither is findind that for CTR AND AUC the Settlement cost elements are the original cost elements.
    I'm thinking about changing message KD506 to warning, do you know if this can help?
    Kind Regards
    Mayumi Blak

  • GL account and cost center field appearing for Goods issue movt type 201

    Hi SAP Gurus
    We are trying to post goods issue in ecc6 . The problem is that the GL Account and cost center fields are available fields .The cost center field is logical but why the GL account field is avaiable .
    How we can grey out the same field as it is going to be picked up from the valuation class setting in GBB - VBR ? Any ideas
    Regards
    Hitesh

    Hi Ravi
    You think that its ok we have to input the cost center .
    But if you allow the users to input the GL then you are overriding the whole purpose of defining the valuation class and offsetting entries ? What is your opinion ?When you input the material in the goods issue screen the offsetting entry needs to be picked from the GBB -VBR .Although even if you do not enter the GL the system posts the Godds issue document .But from the control perspective this needs to be suppressed .
    What do you think ?
    I have also posted the same in Logistics forum .
    Once  again many thanks for your help .In case you find some solution this would be of great help
    Regards

  • Cost center not appearing for G/L (Balance account) while posting

    I have created symbolic account 1300, accrued leave pay with account assign type as F.
    I hvae assigned the relevant G/L to this symbolic account under 'assign balance sheet accounts'
    However while posting, the relevant cost center assignment is not captured next to the G/L account.
    The cost center is correctly maintained in IT0001 and is displayed for the other expense accounts. But is missing for all balance G/L accounts.
    Please guide
    Ally

    Hi Ally,
    I have similar requirement, can you please let me know what did you changed in the Posting Variant.
    Your help is much appreciated, and rewrded. Waiting for your reply.
    Thanks,
    Janga K.

  • Disable or Validate Order or Cost center in MIGO for Mvmt type 201/261

    Hi All,
    I want to disable or validate 'Order' field in MIGO for the goods issue if the movement type is 201.
    I want to disable or validate  'Cost Center' field in MIGO for the goods issue if the movement type is 261.
    User do not want 'Order' field in MIGO for movement type 201 & User do not want 'Cost centre' field in MIGO for movement type 261.
    Thanks
    Pabi

    Hi
    go to OMJJ
    here select move type and then give move type 201
    now select 201 and click on Field selection (ENJOY)
    now just remove the order field from here
    similarly do for 261 movememt
    this will affect to whole client

  • Error KI222 - Cost Center Not Valid for Date

    Iu2019m having a problem goods issuing material to a cost center (movement type 201) via a call of the BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE BAPI (ECC 6.0).  I can post a specific material / plant / storage location / cost center combination without issue via MB1A but when attempting to call the BAPI processing the exact same data, I get the error message KI222: Cost center aaaa/ccccc does not exist on 05/14/2009.  (where aaaa = the appropriate controlling area and ccccc = the cost center).  Iu2019ve checked the validity dates on the cost center via KS03 and all looks fine (the cost center is valid until 12/31/9999).  The cost center is valid on the posting and entry date I'm passing in the BAPI header. 
    Any ideas what I may be doing wrong or if thereu2019s some field Iu2019m not appropriately selecting / flagging in the BAPI.  Iu2019m using the BAPI successfully for several other movement types (701, 702, 551, 552).
    Thanks,
    Randy

    are you sure that the posting and document dates you submit with the BAPI are correct?

  • PR Cost Center Release Strategy for Item Level not Working

    Hi All,
    I have a class with 2 Characterictics, CEBAN-ESTKZ (Creation indicator) and CEBAN-KOSTL (cost Center) and I have 2 release strategies the first one should trigger when MRP creates a PR ( ESTKZ=B and KOSTL=No input) this strategy is working fine, but the second strategy should trigger is if manually I create a PR and it is relevant to a cost center (ESTKZ=R and KOSTL=XXXX) This is not working, I dont know why sistem is not triggering the release strategy if everything seems to be ok.
    I know ceban structure has kostl field, but I checked and this field is not in the EBAN table, maybe this is the reason but then how will this work and as far as I know, this is standard field.
    I checked in CL24N and all the objects are assigned to the class, all hace status released (1) and and the "OK" check mark
    I checked in CL30N and if I enter in the ESTKZ characteristic=R and KOSTL=XXXX Then it finds the correct and only strategy, so I don´t know why this is not working, the only strange thing is that in CL30N if I only enter value R and leave empty the cost center, the system finds and shows me the 2 release strategies, this is strange.
    Is it mandatory to include the acc assignment field in the release strategy?
    Please give some guidance.
    Thanks
    Edited by: Julio on Nov 14, 2011 12:14 PM

    Hi, thanks for your reply,
    I have entered with leading zeros to complete 10 characters and is not working, I really don´t understand what is going on here, It should work even if I just have 1 characteristic assigned to the class right? this characteristic is CEBAN-KOSTL but this is not working.
    Any more ideas?
    Regards

  • Account/Cost Center Determination (OKB9) for same plant & 2 cost centers.

    Hi,
    I faced a weird situation My situation is i have the same plant but 2 different profit center's & 2 different cost center's . My OKB9 cost element is configured through "Plant/Valuation Area (1)".
    Previously when ever we used this "Plant/valuation Area" determination we used to give plant and corresponding cost center and left other fields like Business Area, Order and profit center blank. see below thing for clear idea
    Plant A - Cost Center A
    Plant B - Cost Center B
    Now with this weird situation, i am not sure whether we can configure OKB9  as below
    Plant A - Cost Center A - Profit Center A
    Plant A - Cost Center B - Profit Center B
    If we can do as above, will their be any implications.
    could anyone help me out of this situation.
    Thanks
    Shriya

    HI
    No complications for this u can assign the CCtrs to Profit Centres.
    Regards
    Shammi

  • Cost center field disable for few end users

    Hi all,
    Can anyone help me in setting the field Cost center in display mode so that the change of cost center can be restricted in Equipment master record. This should be affected only to a few users while others can have the access to change mode. How do i achieve this....
    Thanks,
    Murad...

    Hi,
    As this is User based setting, this could be achieved only through User Authorisation.
    Even Authorisation group is also editable in Equipment Master, I am not sure how much it will be feasible to achieve your requirement.
    Else give Change mode access (IE02) to particular people who are authorised to change any details like Cost Center.
    In case of other people, have a word document (like Change Request), so that changes could be tracked.
    Regards,
    Maheswaran.

  • How to run GR55 reports in background for cost center hierarchies

    1.  I have been asked by our users to create batch jobs to run in the background for some GR55 reports, that can then be sent directly to cost center managers via email.
    I have figured out the process to do this as long as the cost center manager only needs to see a single cost center at a time.  However, if they are in charge of multiple cost centers, we also want to send them a summarized report using the hierarchy we have set up.  I can't seem to make this work, as the job only seem to recognize the last cost center in the group and the report is for that cost center.
    Example.  cost centers 100, 200 and 300 belong to hierarchy abc.  If I run the job just for cost center 100 it is fine.  But if I have a variant to run hierarchy abc, or even if I use the range 100 to 300, all I get is a report for cost center 300.
    We cannot use BW because we only have revenue in BW.  I am being asked to make this work from standard R/3 within the GR55 realm of reporting.
    2.  In addition, the report selection criteria includes two separate plan/forecast versions.  They need to update these each month prior to running the reports and sending them out.  I looked at the variables associated with the versions and tried to set them up with default values that I hoped would update automatically so that they don't have to manually change 50 or so variants each month.  But I don't see any dynamic variables that I can use to have the system make that change without going into each variant individually.
    3.  There is another piece to this equation as well.  There is another report they want sent out in batch, but it is several pages wide in SAP and several pages long.  So when you run it in batch and either spool it or get it sent as an email, it is very ugly in the formatting due to all the page splits horizontally and vertically.  If anyone knows how to get the report to stay together like it would if you had excel integration turned on, it would be very helpful.  I have tried running it with that integration turned on, but the jobs are set up with user batch_mgr and not my id, so it isn't working well.  The batch_mgr id is just a system id, not a dialog id.  We also don't want the jobs set up with a regular user id because if people leave, then the jobs all need to be changed.

    Kim,
    I may have options for issues 1 and 2. In case of 3, what I can tell you is I understand the concern, but this is what  typically happens in some standard CO reports that are not ALV compatible, I don't think there is not much  there to do unless you add some custom code for the output.
    In regards to point 1, yes,  I have noticed that this happens in some standard and custom reporting, not sure what is going on. I came up with a work around that  made the trick for my client in a similar scenario; which is editing the cost center groups. For instance, instead  of having the group set as a range from 100 to 300,  the groups are have  listed the cost centers, 100, 200 and 300. Obviously, the disadvantage of  this option is  that it would require a bit of more cost center group maintenance.
    In regards to point 2,  I understand from your note  that your users already have set up selection variants for the report. One option for you is to get the help from a developer to create a custom period variable and tiny program that runs in batch every month that would update that variable accordingly. Once that's done, you may have to update at least once, the selection variant  attributes to change the period to a selection variable, so everytime from that point of time forward that the variable gets updated,  it will be ready with the right value for every selection variant that uses it.
    Hope this helps.
    GG

  • PR creation for 'F" in ME51N, ME52n, the cost center field exit getactivate

    Dear Gurus,
    We have a Cost center Field exit activation, meaning when a PR is generated, the system will validate only for his department cost center. Its working fine
    The issue, when we create PR through ME51n or me52n for Acct Assign "F" here we are going to enter only Work order number and GL number, not cost center. Still this field exit has activation,  here the same error message popup, which suppose not to be.
    So in MM configuration,  i have disabled Cost center field  for acct assignment "F".
    Now when i create a PR for F, for single account assignment, the system will alllow, but if i want to distribute the qty to different work order, the system goes for validation for cost center field exit.
    How to resolve for multiple assignment, how to deactivate the Cost center field exit for this case, its woking fine of Single account assignment (after disable the cost center field for Account Assignment "F")
    Please help me out or any way to do this?
    Regards
    RS
    Edited by: RS on Sep 14, 2009 7:40 AM

    Hi,
    Cross check you have Cost Center field is Hidden for Account Assignment Category A (Asset) in t.code:OME9. Now change Cost Center field as Display for Account Assignment Category A and save.
    Now create a new PO with Account Assignment Category A and find the difference how Cost Center appearing in your PO in “Account Assignment” TAB.
    Regards,
    Biju K

Maybe you are looking for