Ramp up speed?

can you rampup speed in fce, i know you can in pro.
anyone?

You may try this free filter Time Remap.
Use the default mode (Variable Speed) and keyframe the Speed control from 0 to 100% to speed up (or from 100% to 0 to slow down to stop).
Piero

Similar Messages

  • Ramp up speed in STP?

    Is it possible to ramp up the speed of an audio file from 10% speed up to 100% (normal speed) over time? After doing a search in this forum it appears that it is not but I did not come up with a definitive NO.
    Thanks,
    Craig

    Hi Craig,
    Sure, its easy--here's how to ramp the tempo.
    -Create a multi-track project.
    -For the tracks you are going to use, you should make them beats-based (control click on the track header ans select beats-based)
    -Put loops on the track (if you are trying to ramp the tempo of something that is not a loop, you should first edit it in Apple Loops Utility and set the number of beats and set it to looping)
    -Reveal the master envelopes (The little diamond near the master fader at the lower left corner of the multitrack timeline window.
    -Add points to the tempo curve--and make a tempo ramp
    Now when you play the multitrack project, you'll hear the tempo ramp.
    If you want this in a single audio file, just export to an aiff (File->Export->Export Mix).

  • What is the best way to ramp footage speed 'Green Wing style'?

    I have some 720P 60fps footage to show people walking in slow motion in a hospital. Looks great, however I would like to speed them up to 'real life' pace and then slow them back down.
    What the easiest way of doing this? Should I do it Motion or in FCP? Why is it so fiddly or am i missing a trick?
    Any guidance greatly appreciated.
    Flavio.

    TIME REMAPPING...
    TUTORIAL HERE.
    Shane

  • FCP clip time remapping / speed ramping question re realtime after changes?

    Hello All,
    My first post here! I tried searches for this topic but didn't find....
    I wasted hours today messing with the keyframe editor to try and ramp parts of a single clip... first time using this feature and couldn't follow the manual! way too difficult to grasp without fluency in 'techygeekconfusic' lingo. Anyway, I don't think the topic was covered from what I read in my version of the manual.
    So I went straight for the keyframe editor graphic display under the clip in timeframe and put in a few points with the pen tool (using time graph blue line) and seemed to be going great until I realised that the segments in the single clip (ten minutes long) that I was adjusting were affecting what came after - ie slowing down the remainder of the clip. And that was all I could get from my manual that this happened without any explanation about stopping it happen by letting the outpoint of the clip readjust automatically for the changes made to that part of clip so that altered clip would be shorter in timeline...
    I then tried again from the start but noting the minus time on pentool arrow when I slid each keyframe point back and subtracting it from the duration in motion tab and that seemed to work for a while...
    but God bless my little brain! what I really wanted to happen - for the blasted thing to readjust itself automatically after I had adjusted a segment of the clip so that the remaining non-adjusted part would play in realtime with a new shorter outpoint in the sequence timeline - just couldn't be realised in my little brain or in the 'user friendly' control panels of FCP.
    I tried to get hold of the 'bezier' point at the end of clip and drag forward at the same rate as each change but could'nt get hold of it! I tried to put two points with pen tool at same time but couldn't isolate them from one another to create four points for adjustment without having still frames between.. blah blah.. I tried to get snapping to the pen tool points for further control but couldn't... duh!
    Please! how do you do it! obviously I have limited intelligence but I need to do this now. I want to adjust the 10 minute clip (DVCproHD 720p24N format - not that this should matter as my sequence settings are same) adjust the clip at maybe 10 different places so that it ramps in speed to cover up some boring areas and then back to normal speed after the changes - not back to some slo mo **! speed.
    I tried cutting with the razor tool to isolate and that didn't work either and other analogue brain type stuff ok I know you are laughing at me now but please help?!! I'm pretty new to this stuff, give me the old reliable Steenbeck and a few real bins and strips of film hanging on clothes pegs and I'll be ok...
    Help will be most gratefully appreciated!!!!!!!!
    Barra
    Message was edited by: BarraAppleId

    Andy did a very good job explaining the underlying problem with the time remap tool.
    The key thing to remember is the first and last frame are fixed in time. If you speed up the clip, time after that keyframe will have to slow down to compensate. Imagine the clip is a rubber band that has been cut so that it is a long string-like form. Now imagine anchoring each end of it with a push pin to a board. If you grab a point on the band and pull it toward one of the pins, the part of the band on the side you are pulling away from the anchor will stretch (run slower) and the side you are pulling toward will bunch up (run faster). But, when all is done, the start and end will still be at the fixed points.
    The way I've worked through this is to make a general guesstimate of how long the clip will be once all the ramping is complete. For example, I want the clip to start at normal (100%) speed and ramp up to 300% and back down to 100%. I might start with a clip having a constant speed of 200% and then change it to variable and play with it. The key concept is if you can get the overall LENGTH to where it should be, the rest works out fine.
    I have repeatedly asked in the FEEDBACK/New Features page that they add a toggle to the speed/time remap tools. This toggle should allow you decide whether the playback TIME for the clip should be fixed or flexible.
    For example, if you were working with a 4 second clip and wish to slow it down by 50% -
    If 'Maintain Time' is toggled ON, when you decrease the speed of clip by 50% - the clip will still play for 4 sec (but will show only half the total frames).
    If the toggle is OFF, the 4 sec clip will now play for 8 sec and will display all the frames.
    Where this concept becomes really powerful is when it's applied to time remap. If you have 'Maintain time' toggled OFF, as you adjust speed, the end point of the clip will float in time. If you increase the speed, the overall time of the clip will shrink. If you slow it down, the end point moves out in time.
    We need to keep asking ...
    x

  • Time or speed ramping

    Unless I'm missing something there seems to be no facility in Audition CS6 to ramp the speed of audio either up or down, say for instance to match a video where things speed up by increments. Am I wrong?

    CS6 doesn't have any form of speed ramping as far as I know.
    The next version (Audition CC) has the Pitch Bender feature back--really useful in sound design terms but I'm not sure that's exactly what you want.

  • The Power Supply Fan is still working, but does not appear to respond to increased loads, and its speed cannot be increased using SMCFanControl. Any suggestions?

    Hi all - My mac pro 1,1 has an enigmatic problem. It's quad-core, 3Ghz, running OS X 10.7.5. The problem began some months back, when running HD video conferences, HD streaming videos and some other graphics-moderate (I won't say intense) uses, such as slide shows in Just Looking. My machine has an ATY, RadeonX1900 card and 2 monitors - both Apple displays, one being 30 inch 2560x1600, the other being 24 inch 1920x1200.
    When I start those types of graphics-moderate apps, after about 5 minutes, something would crash (the monitors making a noise as it did) and the displays would both go black. The power did not appear to be fully cut off from the monitors. I think that the underlying applications, however, did not crash. So, I could still hear and speak to people during video conferences, and I could hear the sound tracks of videos.
    Attempts to restart the computer and get the monitors back did not immediately work to undo the problem, if done straight away. The only way to correct the problem (so as to have the monitors work) was to wait for a few minutes and then restart.
    After a lot of puzzled looking at console logs (and I confess that I am not an expert), I ran into a blank.
    But, because of the timing of the crashes (after ~5minutes use) and restarts (after some minutes wait), I reasoned that the problem might be temperature related.
    Once on that path of thought, I found this article:
    http://worldtv.com/blog/guides_tutorials/fixing_an_overheating_mac_pro_no_expens e_required.php
    I installed both Temperature Monitor and SMCFanControl. And I experimented, and got interesting results:
    Now to the puzzling bit: SMCFanControl shows that the speed of the Power Supply Fan doesn't vary much, even if I use SMCFanControl to ramp fan speeds right up. All of the other fans react to SMCFanControl, going up to and above 2500rpm when commanded. But the Power Supply Fan does not.  Having watched it for a few days now, the Power Supply Fan, according to AFCFanControl, never varies outside of a range from about 600-640 rpm, regardless of what I do with AFCFanControl.
    Also (and not surprisingly), whenever the graphics-moderate apps run, when I ramp all the fan speeds up using SMCFanControl, Temperature Monitor shows that the all of the temperatures within the machine plummet, except in the power supply locations. Power Supply Location 2 is the worst affected. Because the Power Supply Fan does not react as the other fans do, the "crashes" still occur.
    I could post some screen shots of the read outs of SMCFanControl and Temperature Monitor, although I think I have covered the key points in this post.
    It seems that the Power Supply Fan is still working, but does not respond to increased loads.
    Instinctively, I'm worried that if that's right, it might be a hard problem to fix. Any suggestions? Help! I would really appreciate them!
    Cheers
    P

    Thanks for your response Grant. I had already read about, and I think excluded, dust in graphics card/fan/assembly as a cause. The entire inside of the computer, including the graphics card/fan/assembly, is as clean as a whistle. It looks clean. I've cleaned the dust out every now and then (including a few days ago). Also, my undersanding (derived from the article, linked in my first post) is that I might expect to see high temperatures in the Northbridge and memory module B if the graphics card was overheating. According to Temperature Monitor, however, locations do not increase in temperature when I run the relevant apps. Finally, the graphics card/assembly does not feel too hot to touch.
    It is strange that SMCFanControl lists the Power Supply Fan as being software controllable, if that fan is not. Still, your comments are consistent with my observations, as the fan simply does not respond to software control.
    There are two upsides: First, I've something of a work-around. I've worked out what temperature must be achieved in Power Supply Location 2 for a crash to occur, and I can watch that location in Temperature Monitor, terminating the process before that treshold is reached. Of course, that's not ideal. Second, ramping all the other fans up does significantly delay the onset of the problem, and makes recovery time much quicker.
    Is there any donwside to peridically ramping up the other fans when running the relevant apps? Given that it causes all of the other locations to cool significantly, could this lessesn the life expecancy of the mahcine? (I don't want to run the fans up all the time - that's like sitting next to a jet ready for take off!)
    Also, a correction to my first post: Yesterday, with all the other fans running on full and running an HD streaming video, the Power Supply Fan did, eventually, slowly, come up to ~740rpm, which is much higher than the ~640rpm maximum I had previously seen, and this may have aided delaying the onset of the problem. 
    I'm not sure where this leaves me? The problem might now be able managed. Well, sort-of. But it's not eliminated.

  • LoSpeed ramping and slow motion?

    Hello
    I have some dslr and go pro footage shot on different frame rates from 50fps to 120 fps. I want to be able to ramp the speed on the footage. However I keep running into the same problem "Flicker"...
    For example I have some dslr footage shot at 50 fps. I can change the fps in, Modify- Interpret footage, to say 25fps form 50fps to get nice slow motion, but then im stuck with that frame rate for the clip.
    If I start fresh and use the speed ramp, I get jerky footage when I change the speed.
    Is this an after effects task?
    I have seen a few good few tutorials but they always separate the two different techniques. What am I doing wrong?.
    Best example is all those lovely go pro video with things flying by then gradually going to a slow mo then speeding up again seamlessly without any flicker.
    Im not trying to achieve a super slow frame rate like what you might see with twixter, I just want a nice smooth transition from 50fps to 25fps and then back up again.
    Any idea or tutorials would be appreciated.
    Thanks
    Philip

    for 'Extracting audio' read advice on my site
    http://karsten.schluter.googlepages.com/im08tricks
    for slowmo, use a free 3rd party software, illustrated advice on my site:
    http://karsten.schluter.googlepages.com/slowmowithim08

  • Encoder data and speed calculatio​n with PXI 4472B card

    Hi,
    I want to collected time, vibration, encoder and speed signal in one file. I am trying to develop NI by using PXI 4472B and LabView 8.6. Everything is okay but getting only one rpm for speed data. I want to collect continuous data for 15 sec (constant speed) and 15 sec (ramp up speed).
    q1. Would you please look into the VI and provide me some suggestions to get continuous speed and all data?
    q2. What is the best way (programming etc.) to collect constant speed (100 rpm) and ramp up speed (50-1000rpm) data in two files automatically from one test? Any help?!
    New Labview user.
    Regards, Niaz
    Attachments:
    Encoder data Collector.vi ‏156 KB

    Hi Chris,
    Thank you for your warm response. Here is the status:
    1. I already tried to use 'Analog Tacho processing' sub-pallette. See the attachment, but the RPM value is not the same/similar with the actual known RPM. However, 'Timing trans..' sub-pallette shows similar speed in terms of frequency to actual known RPM. Do frequency and speed profile value in NI should not be the same/very close? Encoder disk is of 60 pulse/rev and using laser TTL to get the pulses, signal input is into 4472B. Does it neet to extra processing to count the edges of rising?
    2. I prefer ASCII or TEXT. Experiment is for one ramp-up (50-1000rpm) and one steady (100 rpm) for 15 sec each. I will use this data in Matlab. I am looking for help in programming so that single experiment will divide into two separate files of ramp-up and steady speed. File will consists of time, vibration, encoder value (0,1...) and speed.
    Kind regards, Niaz
    Attachments:
    Data Collector-4NI.vi ‏190 KB

  • BT Inifinity Speed Estimate (New Exchange) - seems...

    Hi
    I am pleased to announce that as of today I have been able to order BT Infinity 2 on the newly enabled exchange at Desborough (EMDESBO) for installation on August 21st.
    My current ADSL speed is roughly 13mb down 1.1 up. Stats at the bottom of post...
    I know we are 2.1km from the exchange, with the cabinet only 0.7km away (being a new estate you can see the trench path for the cabling).
    The initial estimate for BT Infinity is 19.8mb down, 2.9 up which frankly seems extremely stingy and low. Is this truly a reasonable estimate or is it because of it being a newly installed exchange and they don't want to overegg it? Do they ramp the speed up over time?
    Any views or experience elsewhere appreciated. previous BT engineers have said that 30 out of 38 on Infinity would be expected with 60 on Infinity 2.
    Seems slow?
    Regards
    Gavin
    ADSL Stats
    Line state:
    Connected
    Connection time:
    23 days, 00:19:07
    Downstream:
    12.96 Mbps
    Upstream:
    1.129 Mbps
    ADSL Settings
    VPI/VCI:
    0/38
    Type:
    PPPoA
    Modulation:
    G.992.5 Annex A
    Latency type:
    Fast
    Noise margin (Down/Up):
    6.0 dB / 5.7 dB
    Line attenuation (Down/Up):
    27.9 dB / 15.8 dB
    Output power (Down/Up):
    20.4 dBm / 12.6 dBm
    FEC Events (Down/Up):
    0 / 0
    CRC Events (Down/Up):
    49126 / 297
    Loss of Framing (Local/Remote):
    0 / 0
    Loss of Signal (Local/Remote):
    0 / 0
    Loss of Power (Local/Remote):
    0 / 0
    HEC Events (Down/Up):
    130630 / 204
    Error Seconds (Local/Remote):
    35374 / 200

    Gav678 have you tried connecting your hub to the test socket then rechecking your connection speed your low connection speed could be caused by an internal wiring issue it is quite common with ADSL services i you would care to repost on the speed and connection board you will get all the help you need to improve that speed
    If you want to say thanks for a helpful answer,please click on the Ratings star on the left-hand side If the reply answers your question then please mark as ’Mark as Accepted Solution’

  • Has anyone else noticed how much faster the Internet is on this phone?

    This phones Internet is blazing compared to my 3GS. Was this something that was supposed to be expected or am I just imagining things because it loads pages probably twice as fast. I find myself on this thing now more than my laptop!!
    Sorry if I am ******* anyone off with my praise towards Apple, changing the tone for what usually is being said on the Discussion board

    No, you're absolutely right. I've been noticing the speed difference on my new iPhone 4 compared to my friends iPhone 3GS. Steve Jobs mentioned during the WWDC keynote that the new iPhone 4 sports the new 3G radios that support higher download and upload speeds.
    AT&T has been ramping up speeds and improving their network during the last year. It's noticeably faster on my iPhone 4. I've been running some speed tests at random, and i've hit as high as 4Mbit download and 2.3 Mbit upload speeds. Quite impressive!

  • Time remapping in 24p vs 60p sequence

    I'm using 96fps footage from GH4 and go from fast to slow speed ramps all day long.  When doing so in 60p sequences I get far smoother playback when ramping the speed up since there are obviously more frames per second in this sequence vs. the 24p sequence (choppy looking).  Since I create the entire project in 24p for film, how can I get the 60p smoothness for the slow mo shots to work that way in the 24p sequence?  Nesting does not seem to help, it makes the clips look even more jittery.  I feel like I am missing something simple here.  Thanks guys.

    Mike Delaney wrote:
    …  I have heard a lot about 24p being cinematic …
    that is one of the unstopable legends in the net ......
    24p is for celloloid, a compromise of quality vs. costs, created in the 1920s, 18 inch per sec of 35mm film.
    what has the frame-rate to do with 'film-look'?
    first hand - nothing.
    'film' look is based upon color, contrast, depth of field and motion-blurr - which IS hard to accomplish, when frame-rate is 60fps. you can acomplish a film-look with any frame-rate ....
    2nd: video/TV/Youtube are based upon 25/30fps ... so, any 'cinematic' source needs a) slight speed-up or b) a complicated, pulldown, quality lossy process ...
    if you don't publish your recordings in the next Cineplex, stay with 25/30.
    60p-recording is nice in a 25/30 project, 'cause you can create super smooth slowmos.
    not every delivery media or monitor supports 60p ......

  • Working with 60fps clips in 24fps Linked Comp

    I am trying to use the time warp effect in Ae to alter the speed of the clip at different points in the clip.  So going from normal 100% down to 40% then back up to 100%, with a nice smooth gradation/ramping between speeds. 
    This is easy enough to achieve, I know how to do this, but the problem I am experiencing is bringing the clip from a 24fps timeline in Pr into a linked comp in Ae.  The clip is 60fps, and is not conformed in Pr to 24fps.  But when I bring it into the 24fps Ae comp it is slowing the clip down, conforming it to the comps setting, i guess.  I just want it to play back in real time in Ae so that I can edit the time warp myself. 
    It is especially a problem because now the comp length is way shorter than the clip, which makes working with it an absolute nightmare.

    It is very easy to get confused with frame rates. First, the only way to show all of your frames is to have the comp and the footage at the same frame rate. The speed of the playback as it relates to the clock on the wall depends on the frame rate used to record the original footage. If you want to slow down 60fps footage so that is plays at half speed then put your 60fps footage in a 30 fps comp and interpret the footage as 30 fps. Now the every frame of the footage will play back but it will take 20 seconds for the clock in the shot to show 10 seconds.
    Most folks have a hard time figuring out how to look at time changes in footage and they make incorrect assumptions. If you want to play your footage at normal speed then slow down the footage, then return to normal speed and your original footage is 60 fps and the final video will be 24 fps then you have to Interpret the footage at it's original frame rate, bring it into After Effects, then enable time remapping. Time remapping will set a keyframe at the start and at the end of the clip. The clip will play back in real time but frames will either be blended or dropped. There is no way around this.
    You go to the point in the time line where you want to start slowing down the clip and you set a keyframe, then you go to the part of the clip where you want the footage to play slowly and set another, then you go to the part of the clip where you want to start returning to real time and set another, then you go to the part of the clip where you want to return to real time.
    Now comes the fun part. You select all of the keyframes except the first two and drag them to the right. so that keyframe number 3, the point where you want the footage to be at it's constant slow motion part is where you want to have this happen according to the clock on the wall. IOW if you want the first 2 seconds to play in real time then the second keyframe is at 2 seconds, then at 3 seconds you want to clip to start playing back at 1/4 speed you would select all of the keyframes except the first two and drag the third keyframe to the 3 second mark.
    Now you select all of the keyframes but the first three and drag them to the right. You need to move the 4th keyframe far enough to the right so that the footage will be playing at 1/4 speed. If you want the original footage from two and a half seconds to 10 and a half seconds to play at 1/4 speed then that's 40 seconds according to the clock on the wall so you would slide all of the keyframes except the first 4 to the right until the 4th keyframe came to the 40 second mark.
    You repeat the process for all of the keyframes except the first 4 and move them to the right until you get to the point where you want the clip to return to normal time. Then you go into the graph editor and adjust the curves of the value graph until you get the timing you want with a constant angle between the first two keyframes, a curve between the second and third, a straight line that has 1/4 the slope of the first section between 3 and 4, then a curve between 4 and 5 and the same slope between 5 and 6 that you have between 1 and 2.
    I think I already went through this for you in another thread. Maybe it was for someone else.
    If you use Twixtor to do this the theory is exactly the same. It just takes a while to get used to thinking in time.

  • Possible to increase rate of rotation over time?

    I need to simulate something similar to the effect of a car wheel rotating, strictly in 2-D, a totally flat side-view. The complication is that I need the "wheel" to be stopped at first, then slowly ramp up speed over time until it reaches a maximum rate. Is it possible to increase the rate of rotation over time? I have tried creating a constant-rate rotation, then exporting as a Quicktime and applying a speed ramp to the mixdown. This looks terrible.
    Any thoughts? Thanks in advance.
    Also, I may post this over at the FCP board, in case anyone there has an idea.
    John

    Actually, that's not true for FCP or Motion. You can set a keyframe at 0 rotation, and then another at the point where you want the rotation to be a full speed and a third keyframe at the end of your animation. Then just right-click the 1st keyframe in the keyframe editor and choose Interpolation: Bezier.
    From there, it's just a matter of adjusting the curve until you have the ramp that you're looking for.
    In FCP, you can add keyframes in much the same way in the Motion tab. Then you right-click the 1st keyframe and choose Smooth from the menu. This will give you a bezier handle that you can adjust to create a ramp.
    I suggest using Motion though as it's a little easier to add and adjust keyframes.
    Andy

  • Easing into and out of transitions

    I have looked at the tutorials for Time remapping, but they arent helping with what i need to do.  i am trying to wipe a title on.  I would like for it to not stop so abruptly at the end of the Transition Wipe.  Is there a way to ramp the speed down as it gets closer to the end of the wipe.  In AVID we had the Ease In  and  Ease out options.  Apprecuiate the help if anybody knows this.  i amsure its something simple.
    Rich

    One cannot keyframe transitions.
    Easy in/out are only for effects.
    Try the Linear Wipe which is keyframable.

  • Motion keyframing with .r3d files

    Hi, I have a strange issue in Premiere working with .r3d files from the newest Dragon in 5k. I am working with the newest CC 2014 Premiere.
    I want to adjust the framing in a 1080p sequence, where I have to keyframe motion in the effects. But whenever I add a bunch of keyframes in succesion to one another to perfectly frame a tracking shot, it loses some of the motion previously keyframed in the same clip. The numbers in the effects still change, but it doesn't show on the actual video.
    This is a really annoying problem that I am struggling with.
    If anyone knows a solution to this, please let me know. Without nesting or converting the files into a different format, as I need the RAW capabilities for the grade.
    Thanks,
    Dan

    Nevermind. I figured it out. For future reference: This was caused by it being a 50fps clip. I had used Time Remapping to bump it up to 200% to get "normal" speed. This is what caused my problems. Doing the speed ramping in Speed/Duration by right clicking worked in combination with Motion.

Maybe you are looking for