Rate Limit on the MPLS Tag interface

In MPLS Networks, we generally enable tag-switching IP and MTU (1526) configuration on the specific interface . Say if the above commands are applied in the 2 mb Lease Line Serial interface , How do i rate Limit to 64K ?
Can anyone provide me this info w.r.t the configuration?
Regards
Srikant

Generic rate-limiting should be possible. Here's a URL explaining how to configure this feature.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/iosswrel/ps5207/products_command_reference_chapter09186a00801a7ee1.html#1080850
Hope this helps,

Similar Messages

  • Can I rate-limit on the sub-interface in cisco asr 1013?

    Hi,
    I am looking for the command of rate-limit on a sub-interface in cisco asr 1013.
    Cisco IOS Software, IOS-XE Software (X86_64_LINUX_IOSD-ADVENTERPRISEK9-M), Version 15.2(2)S, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
    IOS XE Version: 03.06.00.S
    Please let me know if it is possible in cisco asr 1013. If yes then what are the commands.
    Zobair

    The ASR no longer supports the rate-limit command, but it does support the same functionality in a QoS policy.
    Please find a sample configuration -
    ASR1004(config)#policy-map test
    ASR1004(config-pmap)#class class-default
    ASR1004(config-pmap-c)#shape average 10000
    Applying for both ingress and egress : -
    ASR1004(config)#int gig1/1/0
    ASR1004(config-if)#service-policy output test   
    or
    ASR1004(config-if)#service-policy input test

  • Time-out limit of the 8451-I2C interface for hold-master condition

    I am working with Windows XP, Labview 8 and the USB-8451 I2C to USB interface-box.
    We intend to incorporate the USB-8451 into our product evaluation kits for a new sensor product.
    This evaluation kits should be used by our customers when they start working with our sensor products.
    The I2C-device is a digital sensor which generates a hold-master condition with difference length, depending on the sensor configuration.
    The hold-master is produced by the sensor after full transmassion of  start-bit, address, read-bit and ACK.
    After the hold master is suspended three bytes can be read by the master.
    If the hold-master is kept by the sensor for 25 ms or less I have no problems. When keeping it significantly longer the interface seems not to work properly anymore. I don't get a LabView Error-Message but the PC (Windows?) creates a 'ding-dong' sound very similar to disconnecting and connection a USB device. (the 8451???). My LabView-Program does not show sensor data after this.
    I can imagine that the hold-master is somehow too long for one element in the system.
    Is there any time-out period for hold-master defined for the USB-8451?
    How can I change it to higher values?
    Thank you very much for your support!
    Message Edited by UnexpectedLifeForm on 02-19-2007 09:48 AM

    Dear Member,
    That's right. If somebody encounter this problem again.
    You should contact your local NI branch that will install the new firmware
    version (that works with the last driver version)
    Best regards,
    Nick_CH

  • User based rate limit

    Hi,
    Iam looking for a way to Rate Limit - Vlan interfaces,
    Somting like this .. or do I need to change the service-policy to rate-limit for it to work
    Interface Vlan2
    Description Customer-A
    service-policy input police-customerA-traffic
    service-policy output police-customerA-traffic
    ip address 10.10.10.1 255.255.255.252
    Interface Vlan3
    Description Customer-B
    service-policy input police-customerB-traffic
    service-policy output police-customerB-traffic
    ip address 10.10.11.1 255.255.255.252
    Interface Vlan4
    Description Customer-C
    service-policy input police-customerC-traffic
    service-policy output police-customerC-traffic
    ip address 10.10.12.1 255.255.255.252
    Interface GigabitEthernet3/1
    Description Trunk - Customer-A - Customer-C
    switchport
    switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
    switchport trunk allowed vlan 2,4
    switchport mode trunk
    Interface GigabitEthernet3/1
    Description Trunk - Customer-B
    switchport
    switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
    switchport trunk allowed vlan 3
    switchport mode trunk
    Is that posible ??, or do i need to make user based rate limit based on Source / destination adresses, and move the service policy to the physical interface ??
    Hardware in this case Cisco 7609 running MPLS
    Thanks in advance.
    /Peter

    Can you explain your network topology a little?. This would help me to understand your network setup and help you in this issue accordingly.

  • Rate-Limit BRI

    I was working with a co-worker who was seeing FTP choke the B channel when a remote router was on ISDN. Normally we use rate-limit on the frame-relay PVC's, which works great, but when I configured it on the BRI0/0/0 interface, I was not seeing hits on the ACL. Is rate-limit supported on BRI interfaces?

    At this point we are back on the frame-relay connection, so show output wouldn't be helpful. Here's the interface config.
    interface BRI0/0/0
    description Circuit ID and Carrier
    bandwidth 30
    ip address x.x.x.x y.y.y.y
    ip accounting output-packets
    ip nat outside
    ip virtual-reassembly
    rate-limit output access-group 151 96000 12000 12000 conform-action transmit exceed-action drop
    encapsulation ppp
    no ip mroute-cache
    dialer idle-timeout 300
    dialer map ip x.x.x.x name name broadcast xxxxxxxxxxx
    dialer map ip x.x.x.x name name broadcast xxxxxxxxxxxx
    dialer load-threshold 4 outbound
    dialer watch-group 8
    dialer-group 1
    isdn switch-type basic-ni
    isdn point-to-point-setup
    isdn spid1 xxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxx
    isdn spid2 xxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxx
    no cdp enable
    ppp authentication chap
    end

  • SGE2000 QoS: Ingress Rate Limit BUG ?

    I buyed a new unit of SGE2000. Thirst I changed firmware to newest one (3.0.0.18) so I do not know what firmware was installed before.
    The problem is that it is not posssible to change Ingress Rate Limit to value lower than 3500...
    Hardware Version
    00.00.01
    Software Version
    3.0.0.18
    Boot Version
    2.0.0.03
    Manual says:
    Ingress Rate Limit — Defines the amount of bandwidth assigned to the interface.
    For FE ports, the rate is 62 - 100,000 Kbps.
    For GE ports, the rate is 62 - 1,000,000 Kbps
    ====
    Default value for Ingress Rate Limit field is 3500, while I change it to eg. 512 the combobox is opening with warning information:
    "Entered value in highlighted field must be an Integer. Range 3500...1000000"
    "Committed Information Rate (CIR)" field allow to put a value down to 64, so it is ok.
    Should I downgrade firmware to v3.0.0.17 ?
    Any help appreciated.

    My appologies for the lack of reply here.  I checked with the PM for the product and they asked me if there is a case open with the Small Business Support Center (SBSC) on this issue.  Have you had a case open on this yet?  If not can I ask you to log a case and then respond back to this postig with the case number please?  It seems this is a bug so the product team will need to process the fix for this via the standard problem identification/case reporting process.
    Thanks in advance!

  • Setting dynamic rate limit

    I would like to know how to set the dynamic rate limit on the wan and the lan on the spa2102 voip adapter. can anyone help?

    There is no such function on any of the SPA2xxx or SPA3xxx series voice router.

  • Prime Infrastructure 2 - API rate limit change?

    Good day -
    The Prime API is pretty sweet, and can give you JSON data back easily with a call like this:
    https://prime/webacs/api/v1/data/Clients.json?.full=true
    It is, however, limited to 100 results. We'd like to see more than that.
    How do I change this rate limit for the API?

    I have found that this command does work, but still limits to 1000. 
    https://prime/webacs/api/v1/data/Clients.json?.maxResults=9999&.full=true
    Now I get Tomcat a HTTP Status 503 error.  There's another setting I've not found yet.
    My json results say "@count":"6980", suggesting I have that many clients in the database.

  • QoS bandwidth rate limit don't work

    Hello
    Buy a router RV120W, and one of the reasons is limit of bandwidth (QoS). I set up a profile of 1-256 kbps limit, and apply it to the only VLAN that is configured, but does not work and can navigate using the full bandwidth of the internet connection. My firmware version is 1.0.2.6
    Screenshots attached
    thanks
    screenshots attached

    Struggling with a similar issue:
    the setup: internet adsl <--1mbs--> combined router/modem <--100mbs--> RV 120W
    Internet speed is 1mbs. I want to priotize voip calls (via port) and deprioritize one machine (doing downloads). rest of the network should have something in between.
    Firmware upgraded to 1.0.3.10
    I created the profiles bindings, then in QoS settings, selected Priority, Wan total bandwidth 1mbs, and distributed my profiles onto low/med/high (10/31/61).
    When what should be low is downloading, it gets the whole 1mbs and the other are dead slow.
    Changed to rate limit, changed the parameters, etc... no more luck.
    Can you please shed some light as how to configure this - in my case, the whole bw of wan is being used, and prioriization is not happening,
    Rgds

  • Rate limit guest ssid 5500 foreign to 2504 anchor

    Hi
    We have a need to limit bandwidth on guest ssid that is tunnelled to anchor controller.  The 2504 doesn't have rate limiting options but the 5500 does.  If we enabled the rate limit on the SSID details on the foreign would it work (seeing as though the anchor can't have same settings).  I would have thought that the access points terminate on the foreign therefore the rate limit would apply there.
    Would this work or do I need another 5500 as the anchor so that rate limits can match on the SSID?

    Thanks.  It would be nice if Cisco documentation actually clarified this as all guest anchor docs seem not to mention having to have both controllers supporting QoS profiles.

  • How to rate-limit different IP's entering/leaving an Interface?

    Hi There,
    We are an ISP and have an interconnect with say Provider A. Customers of ours use Provider A for layer 2 and us for Layer 3 (IP/Internet).
    Customer #1 to #100 --- (10Mb) --> Provider A ---> ISP ---> Internet
    We'd like to rate limit some customers to 2mb/sec (in/out) on our end because at present they have a 10mb/sec connection coming from Provider A.
    The config we use to peer with Provider A is this:
    interface GigabitEthernet0/1.120
    description Interconnect with Provider A
    bandwidth 400000
    encapsulation dot1Q 120
    ip address A.B.C.1 255.255.255.252
    Customers of ours are simply routed out through this interface like so:
    Customer #1:
    ip route W.X.Y.Z. 255.255.255.255 A.B.C.2
    Customer #2:
    ip route J.K.L.M 255.255.255.255 A.B.C.2
    Is there a way to rate limit both these customers without needing to create a separate class map for each like so:
    class-map match-all CUSTOMER-1-2MB
    match access-group name ACL-CUSTOMER-1
    class-map match-all CUSTOMER-2-2MB
    match access-group name ACL-CUSTOMER-2
    policy-map POLICY-RATE-LIMIT
    class CUSTOMER-1-2MB
    police 2000000 375000 750000
    class CUSTOMER-2-2MB
    police 2000000 375000 750000
    interface GigabitEthernet0/1.120
    service-policy input POLICY-RATE-LIMIT
    service-policy output POLICY-RATE-LIMIT
    I've done this in the lab and I know it works, so Customer #1 ends up with 2mb/sec and Customer #2 gets 2mb/sec too.
    But in production, I'm talking about 100's of customers which we simply route out of this interface. I can't imagine having to configure 100's of class maps and policy maps for each customer to rate limit them to 2mb/sec like in the config above.
    Is there a better way to do this on the router???
    Thanks.
    Andy

    Hi All,
    Doing what Laurent suggested works great. We are able to rate-limit the desired customers by having a separate class-map for each customer that needs to be rate limited under the single policy-map.
    But now we're finding that the CPU utilization has increased by 20% because of this.
    We're pushing about 400M through this interface and rate limiting 7 customers on it.
    Given the large traffic flow through this interface (400M), is it common to see an increase in CPU utilisation by 20%???
    When we take the service-policy off the interface, sure enough the CPU drops by 20%.
    Here's the MQC applied:
    interface GigabitEthernet0/1.120
    bandwidth 400000
    encapsulation dot1Q 120
    ip address 203.17.x.x 255.255.255.252
    ip flow ingress
    service-policy input RATE-LIMIT
    service-policy output RATE-LIMIT
    class-map match-all CLASS-TCS-200338
    description Customer #1 rate limited to 4mb/sec
    match access-group name ACL-TCS-200338
    class-map match-all CLASS-TCS-200208
    description Customer #2 rate limited to 2mb/sec
    match access-group name ACL-TCS-200208
    class-map match-all CLASS-TCS-205593
    description Customer #3 rate limited to 3mb/sec
    match access-group name ACL-TCS-205593
    class-map match-all CLASS-TCS-205679
    description Customer #4 rate limited to 4mb/sec
    match access-group name ACL-TCS-205679
    class-map match-all CLASS-TCS-200441
    description Customer #5 rate limited to 4mb/sec
    match access-group name ACL-TCS-200441
    class-map match-all CLASS-TCS-200005
    description Customer #6 rate limited to 2mb/sec
    match access-group name ACL-TCS-200005
    class-map match-all CLASS-TCS-205560
    description Customer #7 rate limited to 4mb/sec
    match access-group name ACL-TCS-205560
    policy-map RATE-LIMIT
    class CLASS-TCS-200005
    police 2000000 375000 750000 conform-action transmit exceed-action transmit violate-action drop
    class CLASS-TCS-200208
    police 2000000 375000 750000 conform-action transmit exceed-action transmit violate-action drop
    class CLASS-TCS-200441
    police 4000000 750000 1500000 conform-action transmit exceed-action transmit violate-action drop
    class CLASS-TCS-200338
    police 4000000 750000 1500000 conform-action transmit exceed-action transmit violate-action drop
    class CLASS-TCS-205679
    police 4000000 750000 1500000 conform-action transmit exceed-action transmit violate-action drop
    class CLASS-TCS-205560
    police 4000000 750000 1500000 conform-action transmit exceed-action transmit violate-action drop
    class CLASS-TCS-205593
    police 3000000 562500 1125000 conform-action transmit exceed-action transmit violate-action drop
    Is this the correct behaviour of applying the service-policy to the interface whereby the CPU increases by 20% or can the MQC be fine tuned to have less of an impact on the CPU?
    Is the router just overloaded, taking into account it's only pushing about 400M? Should it be able to do more than this??
    Thanks.
    Andy

  • Rate limit a certain pvc on an ATM interface on DSLAM

    Dear Sir
    I want to rate limit a certain pvc on an ATM interface on DSLAM 6260, Taking into consideration that i have tried all the kind of configuration using the rx-cttr and tx-cttr but all was useless.
    Could you please guide me how to do that, especially if i have a multiple pvcs on the same ATM interfaces and i need each not to raise above certain limit?
    Thanks in advance

    Dear Sir
    First thank you for your reply and concern.
    Here is the version 12.2(12)DA8 as i told you it is a Cisco DSLAM 6260 with NI-2, and as i got from the TAC that it is the latest (as far as i know).
    Thanks a lot

  • Rate limit the internet Bandwidth/Speed

    Hello ,
    In ASA 5510.
    How I can limit the users in (VLAN 20) to use the internet with a limited Bandwidth/speed with 3 mbps upload and 5 mbps download?
    In case the outside interface (Native vlan) which is connected to the ISP and have a bandwidth/speed of 30 mbps upload and 50 mbps download.
    Thanks in advanced,
    MKD

    This worked well for limiting download but doesn't seem to put a limit on the upload.  Am I doing something wrong?
    I was just using speedtest.net to verify my upload and download are 10 Mbps.  The test result is 9.40 Mbps down and 17.22 Mbps upload.  I've retested a few times with the same result.
    If I remove the service policy I get 55-60 Mbps up and down so it seems like the upload limit is doing something.
    I do get matched packets for input and output though,
    Interface Public_Wireless:
      Service-policy: SHAPE-PUBLIC-WIRELESS
        Class-map: LimitPublicWireless
          Output police Interface Public_Wireless:
            cir 10000000 bps, bc 312500 bytes
            conformed 160908 packets, 180033824 bytes; actions:  transmit
            exceeded 4952 packets, 6813748 bytes; actions:  drop
            conformed 1502312 bps, exceed 56968 bps
          Input police Interface Public_Wireless:
            cir 10000000 bps, bc 312500 bytes
            conformed 103702 packets, 26569368 bytes; actions:  transmit
            exceeded 1193 packets, 1561054 bytes; actions:  drop
            conformed 221728 bps, exceed 13048 bps
    Here's my config,
    ! all wireless ip traffic
    access-list PublicWireless extended permit ip 10.0.0.0 255.255.248.0 any
    access-list PublicWireless extended permit ip any 10.0.0.0 255.255.248.0
    class-map LimitPublicWireless
    match access-list PublicWireless
    policy-map SHAPE-PUBLIC-WIRELESS
    class LimitPublicWireless
      ! 10Mbps limits
      police output 10000000
      police input   10000000
    ! What interface it is sourcing from
    service-policy SHAPE-PUBLIC-WIRELESS interface Public_Wireless

  • xsql:query - Is there a character limit on the SQL contained in the tag?

    Is there a limit to the length of the SQL contained in the
    <xsql:query> tag ?
    I've been very successful with short queries using xsql:query
    tags, however, for longer queries they seem to fail the XML
    Syntax check using JDeveloper 3.2.3.
    The resulting error from the XSQLServlet is XSQL-005 page is not
    well formed with the following:
    XML-0201: (Fatal Error) Expected name instead of .
    XML-0122: (Fatal Error) '=' missing in attribute.
    XML-0125: (Fatal Error) Attribute value should start with quote
    (Posted example 10/16/01)

    Hello Bill,
    >> … to our apex environment (9.2)
    The following might give you some more information on your possible situation -
    Re: Is there a maximum number of characters allowed in PL/SQL Anonymous Blo
    ORA-06550 recieved when trying to modify existing page after 3.1 Apex upg
    Regards,
    Arie.

  • Using Pintrest getting a message " you hit the rate limit" anyone else getting this message?

    I am using my wifi at home not sure what this rate limit is all about. Anyone else getting this message on Pintrest?

    As I understand it, you would need to go back before Mavericks. Such as, wipe your Mac and install a clone of your old Snow Leopard installation. Make sure the old iWork apps were installed and upgrade to Mavericks.
    What occurred when I upgraded from Mt Lion to Mavericks, is the MAS detected my installed iWork '09 apps, alerted me to available updates and presented the Mavericks versions of iWork in the Purchases pane for me to accept into my account. After I accepted them into my account, it then proceeded to install the Mavericks versions in the Apps folder and at the same time sequestered my previously installed iWork '09 apps in a folder in the Apps folder named iWork '09. Later, when I upgraded to OS X Yosemite, the MAS alerted me to upgrades for the Mavericks iWork apps and updated them to the Yosemite versions.

Maybe you are looking for

  • File system cache performance

    hi. i was wondering if anyone could offer any insight into how to assess the performance of the file system cache. I am interested in things like hit rate (which % of pages read are coming from the cache instead of from disk), the amount of data read

  • XI 3.0 Version Conflict after SP 10 import

    My XI 3.0 integration builder shows a version conflict for IDOC adapter meta data after we have implemented support package 10. What needs to be done ?

  • Timestamp software for Mac

    Is there any software for Mac through which I can place a timestamp on videos I import?

  • Blackberry Protect & "Reload Software: 552" Message

    In two years of owning my Tour, I had never received a "Reload Software: 552" message until I installed Blackberry Protect last night and restarted my Tour.  Has anyone else had this problem with Protect and what is the solution?

  • Staring the entire group by sort

    There seems to be a bug! When I choose sort by date and then group by sort, if the group is not expanded and I click where the email star should be, it stars all the emails on that group. I have made a gif of what I'm talking about. http://i.imgur.co