Read my Feedback

Why i don't see any xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx button called delete my account ? i have more than 10 Skype nicknames, and i want to delete some of it. and i can't.
Please, Respect your users and make for them " Delete my account " button. as any big site.
Thanks for reading my Feedback!

https://support.skype.com/en/faq/FA142/can-i-delete-my-skype-account?q=delete+account
TIME ZONE - US EASTERN. LOCATION - PHILADELPHIA, PA, USA.
I recommend that you always run the latest Skype version: Windows & Mac
If my advice helped to fix your issue please mark it as a solution to help others.
Please note that I generally don't respond to unsolicited Private Messages. Thank you.

Similar Messages

Does Apple read the Feedback?

No offence, but the first update doesn't seem to actually done anything functionally. Multiple contact SMS, contact lookup in phone mode, MMS texting, games, ringtones, copy/paste, video, sending contact info via text. A handful or other items seem to dominate the forums, yet Apple didn't add any of those functions.
When will the next update happen? I hope it is better than this one.

Do they read the feedback? Of course they do. However, that doesn't mean to say that they act on every suggestion, or even suggestions we might think would be the common ones.
The iPhone was designed to fulfill specific needs for specific reasons - Apple didn't leave features out by mistake. Any fool who knows a tiny bit about the cellphone market knows what features other phones have, so it's not like they were in the dark about what options other manufacturers included. What they clearly did was build a device that was different, to appeal to people who didn't much want the same feature set as they could get from anywhere else.
If Apple consider adding additional features it may be in part because a significant number of users ask for these things, but in all likelihood additional features that do get added will be in keeping with the product as it now stands rather than an attempt to make it just like everything else out there.

Abode Reader User Feedback and Suggestions

Hi,
I am new to this forum.
I am currently using Abode 7.0 at the work place.
I am interested in helping Abode to improve the products as I discover new ideas over time.
May I know where should I post those ideas and user feedback ?
Thanks
Low

Maybe you should try and upgrade to 9 and see if the things you want are already there. 7 is old.

TS1567 I have spent about 45 mins reading the feedback/suggestions and I still cannot see any on my devices, what else can I do?

I have changed cables, updated iTunes restarted PC what else now?
I have a new iPhone 5s, I still cannot see it...very frustrating. I have withdrawl symptomps. I have been using iPhone since 3GS. My first iPod was 256KB. Apple (iTunes sync) have gone from best to very bad. I just hope they dont get worse.

If you value your time you can call Apple for support. If you are more DIY guy follow that article.
http://support.apple.com/kb/ts1538

No feedback from resolver after upgrade from 7 to 8.2

Hi,
I am running a Pac Sci servo motor as a stepper (with step and direction signals) and
using the resolver as feedback (analog channel 1) with a PCI 7344 motion card.
I have updated NI Motion device drivers, firmware, and LabVIEW 7 express to 8.2.
In measurement and Automation I reconfigured closed loop stepper using analog feedback.
1-D interactive:
I command a move, the servo moves, but the position display does not change, only the following error increases.
The servo movements are in the correct direction but result in different magnitudes with the same movement command.
The system worked fine on a different computer before upgrading the motion drivers, firmware, and Labview.
Where do I start?
Matthew

Hi,
If the position doesn't change this means that the board can't read the feedback signal for some reason. If your position stays exactly at 0 with analog feedback enabled please check the cabling for your resolver (is it powered?). Please check if the ADC is working correctly by reading it in an application (please unmap it from the axis before).
You could also try to find out if it works correctly when you rewire your motor/resolver to work with another axis.
Please let me know how it works
Best regards,
Jochen Klier
National Instruments Germany

Apple please read. Simple Feature needed for iTunes.

In a future version of iTunes please make it that when you select multiple songs you can still access the OPTIONS features in the Get Info tab. Thank you.

if you want to guarantee that someone from Apple reads your feedback, you can now use the itunes application feedback form. here's a link to it:
iTunes application feedback

Apple feedback contact for real?

At 10 pm Pacific time I received an email from FCPX_feedback at apple.com saying they wanted to follow up on my FCPX forum post about my positive experience with FCPX and that I have to trash the preferences. Could that email be for real? I always read the feedback is read by Apple, but no contact to the contributor would be made.
Has anyone here ever received an email from Apple about their feedback?

Great, thanks Tom. I look forward to working with them.

Strange marks during reading Rs232 buffer

Hello,
I have got the problem with read Rs232 buffer.
I am sending a frame to initiate an buffer from RAM of the external device. Everything looks correct, the device is answering, but during reading a feedback message i receive a strange marks(attached jpg). I wrote adequate software in c# to have sure the external equipment is available, it works. So i checked if in my .vi are any bytes in the received buffer of Rs232, yes they are...So the problem is in LABView. Does anyone have had the same situation?
I am wondering if there is no any problem with fonts or something?
Thanks for any tips.
Solved!
Go to Solution.
Attachments:
1.jpg ‏43 KB
2.jpg ‏246 KB

You should only be configuring your port once. That should be done before this loop. By configuring the port inside of the loop, you are reinitializing that port with every call. That could cause weird things while the configuring is happening.
You should probably have a wait sometime between your write and your read to allow your device to respond.
Is your device sending an End Of Line character at the end of each message? If so, get rid of the "Bytes At Port" propery node. Just tell the read to read something really large. It will automatically stop reading when that End of Line character is found. If it isn't sending that character, you should disable that with the Configure Serial Port (that you should have BEFORE that loop).
There are only two ways to tell somebody thanks: Kudos and Marked Solutions
Unofficial Forum Rules and Guidelines

Community Forum or Farce? MODERATOR PLEASE READ!

I've just scanned the headings for the most recent 300 or so threads in this sub-forum, and can find only ONE that has been "Locked" - my own recent "+iTunes a victim of the obesity epidemic+"?
Your Help documentation states that "+Only the original topic poster has the option to mark replies as either Helpful or Solved ... *the originator* can also end the discussion by marking the topic as "answered+"."
I did NOT mark the topic "answered" or a reply "Solved". After wasting a lot of time typing a reply to recent posts, only to have it rejected because someone chose to close the thread while I was typing, I eventually discovered that it had been marked "+assumed answered+" by "_a moderator_". (Help doesn't say anything about "+assumed answered+").
More time spent working out that I can change it back to "unanswered", only to find that that doesn't appear to make any difference - the thread remains locked.
Can you at least advise why the arbitrary decision? Why just my thread out of at least the most recent 300? Why a thread that minutes earlier had had a reply posted by someone else? Why not even the courtesy of advice or explanation when a current thread gets closed down by some anonymous person?

Thank you, joshz. I guess Rachel has been too busy to answer for herself, and I will assume that her comments are her own, and that she is not speaking on behalf of Apple.
Rachel, thanks for your input. What follows is both a reply to your post, and an attempt to address some broader issues that it raises.
First some background. I have been involved with microcomputers in the PC world, not the Mac world, since the day IBM released the first PC, and long before even the first version of Windows. (For "involved" read "working in the industry".) Until iTunes, I have had very little to do with Apple. That allegiance does not necessarily reflect a product choice - it has been partly through circumstances and career requirements. I have worked for/with large players in the industry (including IBM), and my career has placed me in many roles including moderating user forums and heading technical support departments.
So while new to these Apple Discussions, I would like to think that I come here with a little knowledge about the industry and its relevant practices, policies and ethics.
Some of us arguably misguided "PC folk" have long held a sometimes-concealed envy for the Apple world. From the outside, Apple has appeared to stand out as a more liberal and freethinking company/environment than the more formal, old school, mainstream of the industry. It is with genuine regret that my experience on these forums in the last few days has gone a long way towards destroying that perception.
My impression so far about Apple Discussions includes the opinion that its ranks are broadly made up of four categories of individuals...
- A very large number of users seeking help, some of which are not afraid to express their frustration about problems encountered (as one would expect in any such forum);
- A smaller number of users with a wealth of knowledge, and the commendable altruistic trait of offering assistance to others;
- A smaller subset of the previous category who can be and usually are just as helpful, but that though not directly associated with Apple (as far as we can tell), also bring with them a strange zeal, passion or obsession to defend Apple at all costs and in any situation - not always, IMHO, fairly or impartially. Apple is always right, the customer wrong. They unfortunately (again IMHO) can become quite condescending towards other users who sometimes may deserve it, but often do not. (They can appear to be self-appointed enforcers, but I will refer to them here as the loyalists.)
- An even smaller number of invisible hosts or moderators, including some that are undoubtedly doing a great job, but others (hopefully a small minority) that give the appearance of also getting carried away with too strict an enforcement or interpretation (often arbitrary) of "the rules" or their intent.
Rachel, to you and that "someone" that you mentioned who also sought to "set me straight" in my locked thread, I would say that the very "Help and Terms of Use" that you are both fond of quoting can give rise to some interpretations other than your own. (I take comfort in the clause that states, "Views expressed on the Site are not endorsed by Apple".) Here are a few random snippets, which I admit include my opinions - but respect them if you wish me to respect yours.
- The very first sentence reads... "Apple Discussions is a user-to-user support forum where experts and other Apple product users get together to discuss Apple products." And the name of the facility is Apple Discussions. Sorry, but I object to you and ed2345 trying to suggest that you know what constitutes a valid discussion, but I don't.
- "A user-to-user support forum" - with due respect, that could imply to some a slightly greater degree of user rights than what appears to be the case, or what you appear to endorse.
- "Constructive feedback about product features is welcome". Sorry, I thought that that was what my locked post was about.
One of the problems, in my view, is that some of the users for whom this facility is allegedly provided choose to treat that last quote as reading "+Constructive feedback ... is welcome as long as it does not include any negative remarks, nor attempts in any way to convey dissatisfaction or the suggestion that Apple is anything less than perfect+".
"Constructive feedback" carries an implication that something can be improved or is lacking. It is difficult for some to validate this without illustrating what is wrong or needs improvement. That task is made even more difficult if there is a bunch of people around waiting to jump on a well-intended contributor because in their view the thin hazy line between describing a problem and complaining about it has been crossed. You believe that "+Complaints are not constructive+". As another poster so aptly put it in another thread in which you also participated, we are left feeling that we must constantly "+walk on eggshells+". (He also suggested that these forums are suppressing free speech.)
Here is how I am left feeling: There is a surprising degree of paranoia in these forums, and they are conducted in a fashion that implies that criticism cannot be tolerated and dissent must be suppressed. (As a foreigner, I'll refrain from any comparisons to world politics or suggestions of great irony.)
As surprised as I have been to find this within Apple of all places, I am even more surprised at the degree of patronising defensiveness that appears to motivate some of the "contributions" of a small group of loyalists.
Time to walk on eggshells, and emphasize that I am attempting to express impressions that are generated here, and in no way am I trying to be "defamatory". My previous reference to Seinfeld's Soup Nazi was meant to be as light-hearted as its source. But my mind is now entertaining some uncomfortable comparisons with the Hitler Youth movement, trained to believe and preach that the leader can do no wrong, and that suggestions to the contrary must be stamped out.
(Yes, Kryten, I may have again invoked Godwin's Law, which I believe might be your way of saying that you believe that I’ve lost the argument. But I think that the "Fanboys" and "Post Count" segments may equally apply to some of the people that I am talking about.)
This group of users seems to condone arbitrary constraints on what can be said, and how. But please, people, at least be consistent. And try to teach by example. By all means, preach the sacred Terms of Use when it is appropriate. But one gets the impression that you interpret the TOU to fit your argument at the time. Rachel, you frequently jump in when someone bemoans Apple's lack of involvement here by emphasizing how the TOU clearly state that these are USER forums. Valid point, but in other situations you are just as quick to point out how this facility belongs to Apple, which entitles them to run it as they see fit. You seem to want to have it both ways.
Then we are so often chastised by the loyalist group for breaking the rules about content. They quote time and again the provision that submissions should be about technical support issues or constructive feedback. But Rachel you give the impression that you can sometimes bend the rule, or that your interpretation of what it means is superior to that of others. I don't complain about your posts in "How to stop Apple spam emails" nor, in "I very disappointed with Apple", your contribution about whether some company is an authorized reseller. I don't believe such posts to be about constructive product feedback or about technical support, but neither do I believe that it is for me to point that out to you.
Speaking of interpretation, you have called my locked thread "+something of a poll, also prohibited in the Terms of Use, seeking to get others to agree with your complaint+". With respect, that is your opinion and not necessarily factual. My feedback, which you chose to label a complaint, included the wish to find out if users with more experience agreed with my suggestion, or if there was a valid counter-argument. That is a form of seeking replies - the very purpose of the forum. I even asked for "an argument to tell me why I'm wrong", though in retrospect, and knowing what I do now, the choice of the word "argument" was unfortunate as it could lend itself to the wrong interpretation by some. (I meant "argument as in discussion", but I wasn't walking on eggshells at the time.) Loyalist traits aside, I think that to interpret that post only as a complaint and a poll is very narrow and shortsighted. (And please, don't reply that you were merely speculating on how the moderator may have seen it. (S)he can speak for him/herself, and there is a strong implied agreement in your wording.)
I'd like to make two points about the "Terms of Use". Firstly, in the corporate world just about every "agreement" contains provisions to cover any number of situations so that the first party can optionally rely on them if considered necessary. (The operative word being optionally.) This practice, initiated by lawyers to protect their client in all circumstances, does not in itself mean that all provisions, in their widest possible interpretation, should be strictly implemented or adhered to in every possible situation.
Secondly, the loyalists are also very fond of telling the rest of us that Apple owns these "user forums" and can therefore do as it sees fit. On the surface that seems valid, but IMHO you are implying an arrogance on the part of the company that does not benefit its image. Here is a counter-opinion: I am sick of suggestions that Apple is "doing us a favour". That's like asking me to bend down and thank the government for providing roads. WE pay for those roads with our taxes, and we pay for the government. And it is *the customer* that pays for all of Apple's (and most other companies’) facilities. I am grateful for the forums (or at least I was when first joining), but it strikes me as patronising to suggest that we should bow and give thanks for "a favour".
As to the various no doubt well-intended suggestions that I should find other forums in which to post, it seems a little strange to suggest that I should look elsewhere for the best place to discuss or ask about Apple matters. I would like to think that my other posts have been valid and may even have included a small contribution to (what should be) the cause. I am guilty of asking more than I have answered, but didn't all of you start out that way? If the loyalists don't like the way I write, or want me to change my personality before I am accepted in the community, forgive me for feeling that that is your problem, not mine. Apple may have the contentious right to ask me to go elsewhere, but I am not subscribing to an apparent class system of users.
Only because I'm posting this here, I find it necessary to duck some additional loyalist comeback by stating that this, perhaps the longest post that I've ever written, IS entirely "Feedback about Discussions" (even if I happen to be long-winded). And I won't dwell on someone's arbitrary distinction between feedback and complaint. The original post in this thread concluded with what I believe to be valid questions about the actions of moderators. In spite of reassurances from others that moderators do read all posts in THIS forum, and that this is the place for such questions, I have so far received no answers - just loyalist opinions. That includes Kryten's suggestion that I am "+going on an uncontrolled attack on the people that are tasked to moderate Apple Discussions+". Uncontrolled? By the way, that "attack" was directed not at "the people" in general, but at the actions of a particular moderator. Moreover, any plural use was limited by the phrase "such moderators" - I.e. those that may behave similarly. Though again I plead guilty to two mistakes - I wasn't walking on eggshells, and I broke the golden rule that says that we should not in any way question the behaviour of the company or its representatives.
Since I seem to be a rule-breaker, I'm about to risk adding more fuel to the fire. I'll close by including below a cut and pasted piece that was originally meant to be a reply in my locked thread to a loyalist post that it elicited. Reason for including it here is not just that I was denied a right of reply. I think it also addresses some of the above issues, and is direct "Feedback about Discussions".
=================================================================
ed2345 wrote:
According to the site terms of use that we have all agreed to, "your Submission should either be a technical support question or a technical support answer." However, if you are interested, a web search would surely turn up sites out there where you could get a good argument going! Cheers M8.
ed2345, I'm sure that many must be grateful for the sheer volume of posts under your belt, and that it demonstrates true community spirit.
However, before posting such comments about my submission and acting as the rules enforcer, may I suggest that "+People that live in glass houses+..."?
Firstly, it would seem that you have distorted the Terms of Use by selectively quoting only a part of clause 2.3. The actual wording (my emphasis) is...
from Terms of Use:
+"*Unless otherwise noted*, your Submission should either be a technical support question or a technical support answer. *Constructive feedback about product features is welcome as well*+."
I'd like to think that my post might be seen, at least in the eyes of some, as "+constructive feedback about product features+".
As with anything, that may be a matter of opinion and you may disagree. However, I reserve the right to my opinion that many of YOUR posts in other threads appear to have nothing whatsoever to do with EITHER technical issues OR product feedback. Just a few...
- Q: Where do I purchase songs not available in iTunes? Your post: Buy from Amazon.com.
- Where to find the Billboard Top 100 from previous years.
- The correct apostrophe use in "90's music" and whether "Think Different" is grammatically correct.
So apart from your arguably misleading statement about the terms of use, it also seems to be a case of "+Do as I say, not as I do+".
I prefer "+Live and let live+".
Cheers.

Configure KM folders for no feedback permission

We have the following customers needs for KM folders.
- By default, users can't feedback on a document, but they can read documents.
- Some users can read documents and make feedback (and this implies that they can read their previous feedback, that's not a problem).
- Administrators can read/write documents and write/read all feedbacks on a document.
So the problem we are facing now, is how to disable feedback by default, so that basic users can't see the link "Give feedback " on the command menu, and they can't see the feedback on the details screen.
We have configured the service permission for a folder that basic users haven't any service permission (we assume that feedback service is included) in this folders (and no permissions are inherited) or just layout service. But the fact is that the user can read the document (this is OK for us), but they can also feedback this document (that's what we don't want...).
Any idea if it is possible to configure? What's the possible solution?
Thank you very much

Hi Sergi,
"All users with read permission for an object can create feedback for this object as long as they can see the command for creating feedback on the user interface." (http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/3a/d609f7803111d5992f00508b6b8b11/frameset.htm)
The only restriction you can do is to restrict the feedback command to be available for certain roles, see "Roles with Visibility" in http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/9d/233f989a5ba64fa44ed6e0823286ee/frameset.htm
Hope it helps
Detlev

EPMA : any feedback ?

Hi
I read a lot of interesting question on this forum about EPMA, and a lot of interesting answer, mainly thank's to JohnGW, but I read few feedback, with real case study.
Does anybody have deploy EPMA on a production environment? (V 11.1.3) What are the main issues you met?
Does anybody try the DataSync between HFM and Planning?
In the next few months, my company will certainly experienced EPMA connected with ERP Integrator and EBS R12 + Planning + HFM ... thus I'm a bit worry !
Thanks in advance
xav'

Hi,
1. I have tried ERPI , and it works fine . You can find posts related to ERPI here
Financial Data Management
2. Data sync does work and you can find some information in the rittman site too
http://www.rittmanmead.com/2009/10/09/using-epma-for-managing-hyperion-planning-applications/
Sandeep Reddy Enti
HCC
http://hyperionconsultancy.com/

[Feedback Needed] Filtering your Playlists

Hey everyone, Spotify staff here.
We're happy to announce the ability to filter your playlists will return in the 1.0.6 update for Desktop. We're also giving two different versions of this feature to users--and we'd love to hear what you think.
Ctrl+F/ Cmd+F
Some users will only see a filter bar when they select a track in the playlist and then click Ctrl+F (Windows) or Cmd+F (Mac). This bar will appear at the top of the playlist (please note it won't be stickied at the top when you scroll down).
Static filter bar
The other users will see a filter bar that remains at the top of each playlist at all times (stickied at the top). No need to click Ctrl+F/ Cmd+F.
Our teams here at Spotify headquarters want to know what you think about the filtering option you're given. We're actively reading your feedback and comments here in the Community, and we want you to know we're listening.
You can post your feedback here in this thread. If you have a different feature idea you can post it in our active Idea Exchange.
When we have further updates about filtering 'Songs' and 'Artist Pages' we'll let you know. Thanks everyone!

"Ctrl+F/ Cmd+F: Some users will only see a filter bar when they select a track in the playlist and then click Ctrl+F (Windows) or Cmd+F (Mac). This bar will appear at the top of the playlist (please note it won't be stickied at the top when you scroll down)."Okay, why would I have to select a track when I've already selected the playlist I want to filter? This seems like a dumb limitation and will hinder user experience. "Static filter bar: The other users will see a filter bar that remains at the top of each playlist at all times (stickied at the top). No need to click Ctrl+F/ Cmd+F."This sounds like a good solution to new and current users alike, but this will have to be activated via the Ctrl/Cmd-F combination, in addition to mouse/touch input (and accessible without having to select a track prior to using it). The return of this function should be universal wherever there's a list of songs. Please don't do a half-assed version of this.

Encryption software for WD MyPassport Wireless, please give feedback

I just started using this and it's very easy to set up. But I had to change the path in all your sh sript files to ENCFS=/home/root/wdcrypt/encfs from ENCFS=/home/root/encfs/encfs. I could have renamed wdcrypt folder to encfs, but I don't know whether that will affect anything else. Thanks for your contribution.

I created some software for storing encrypted files on the hard drive, please test it and tell me what you think! But do NOT use it to store anything valuable until you have at least tested it for a while and read some feedback from other users! https://github.com/maglar0/wdcrypt Read everything on there and try the demo of the web GUI (at https://maglar0.github.io/wdcrypt/?demomode=1 ), then grab the installation file located under "releases" on the github page.

Where to send/post Support/Genius Bar Feedback?

Where are we supposed to send/post Support/Genius Bar Feedback?
I'd like to share my experience but I can't find any place for this type of feedback.

Hi Dancin' Brook!
If you had a positive experience at an Apple Genius Bar, maybe a forum related to the issue you were having, with your particular Mac model or OS, would be a good place.
For example, if it was your iMac G5, or your iBook G3, post in one of those forums.
Or if it was a problem with the installed Tiger 10.4.x OS, post in one of the Tiger forums.
Everyone enjoys reading good feedback!
You could also call, or revisit the Apple retail outlet where you utilized the Genius Bar, and relate your experience to a manager.
Good Luck!
ali b

Encoder Feedback question.

I am reading encoder feedback using Visual Basic and an E-Series Board. My problem is as follows: when the motor is moving in the negative direction and the encoder is counting down towards zero counts what is the best way to start displaying the counts as negative when it passes zero?

Since the STC is a 24-bit counter, it's a bit awkward to display the counts as negative. The least complicated solution would be to simply have a case statement that divides the counter values such that half are positive and half are negative.
value1 = measuredValue;
value2 = 2^24 - value1
if(value1 < value2)
reportedValue = value1;
else
reportedValue = -1 * value2;
The only time this method would break down is when the encoder moves in a positive direction too far (2^12 ticks) in which case the numbers would go negative, but this isn't a common issue.

Read my Feedback

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for