Rejecting subcontracting assembly to 2 or more child part vendors

Dear all
I have a problem in our quality management system of our client
Iu2019m trying to reject a subcontracting assembly (C) made from two child parts A & B
Both child parts A & B are faulty parts and since the child part vendors are certified both the parts have been in-warded to plant and are sent to subcontracting vendor.
Assembly C is made from both the parts A&B which is also in-warded in to plant.
Now I am trying to reject the part C through line rejection/ secondary rejection (QM01) but in my quality management system I can only post assembly part to only one child part.
i.e, sending the assembly part to block stock  posting the assembly stock to one child part  rejecting the child part to child part vendor.
So my question is how should I reject the assembly on both child parts and reject both the child part to their respective vendors.
Regards
NVB

In such scenarios what I understood is When can not actually reject the Child item in assembly independently ....you have to reject the whole assembly.
When you reject the assembly assembly goes by 122 mvt & child items by 542 mvt.Stock at vendor increase for child item.
Now its very much company specific process when it comes to rejection from vendor side.
you have to take help of MM guys for designing such process as Excise comes into picture.
I hope this will add some value

Similar Messages

How to desable ok check for subcontracting child parts in MIGO

Dear SAP Experts,
my client is having one issue regarding disable OK check for subcontracting child parts in MIGO transaction ,In MIGO subcomponenets are attached to main component , my client is asking for disable that OK check box user shouldnot remove that check box tick mark when system showing message deficiate of subcomponents at subcontractor because some times users removing that check box tick mark and proceeding further, with that they are not able to reconcile the sub challans.
Plz let me know how disable OK check for child parts in MIGO

chandu
while making the po we are explode the BOM and we defined the parant and child mateirlas in bom.
system will show the same in migo . i think there is no standard configration to block the option.
Regards
laxman

Disassembly order for child parts in plastic mold industry

Hi all,
Below is the scenario for Disassembly of child parts in plastic mold industry
1. Client has a FG1 with Child parts CP!, CP2 & CP3.
2. Client delivers 100 Nos of FG1 to a customer
3. Customer returns 20 nos of FG1 as rejected.
4. Client feels that the Child parts CP1, CP2 & CP3 from the rejected 20 Nos of FG1 pieces can be reused & Rejected mold can be grinded and used as regrinded input material.
Can we make a disassembly order.
Pls help to address this scenario
Subbu.
Edited by: Subbu SP on Dec 28, 2010 1:53 PM

Hi,
Even If i maintain negative qty for the Child parts, I am not able to find it in MIGO GRN
Since I have copied Child part with reference to ROH, I could not put co product for the same.
How to address this scenario
Subbu.
Edited by: Subbu SP on Dec 29, 2010 4:51 AM

Perform VENDOR EVALUATION for MORE THAN ONE VENDORS at a time

Hello all,
Please guide for any process where i can perform Vendor Evaluation for MORE THAN ONE vendors AT A TIME.
At my location there are around thousand vendors, which are to be evaluated, and difficult to perform the evaluation process one-by-one.
(ME61/ME62/ME63)
Detailed replies with various possibilities would be highly appreciated.
Thanks & Regards,
Joy Ghosh

The vendor evaluation for some thousand vendors at the same time has already been in SAP long before they developed LSMW. The purpose of LSMW is to load data from a legacy system, of course you can (mis-)use it for a lot other things.
But you should not always use LSMW if you are to lazy to go thru the SAP standard menu to find a transaction like ME6G
There you define a job that runs RM06LBAT report.
You first have to define a selection variant for this report. this can be done in SE38 by entering the report name, select variant, clicking display, then entering a name for the variant and clicking Create.

Reversing Landed Cost document with more than one vendor

Hi Experts,
Reversing Landed Cost document with more than one vendor:
My client can reverse a landed cost document with One Vendor, but cannot with multiple vendors. I have also tested this in 8.8 PL10. Here is a brief description:
Created Landed cost by selecting 2 vendors in the Vendor field.
After you picked one vendor, you go to the vendor code/name again then choose another vendor you
need, once you picked, the system will ask you whether you want to delete the previous data, then
you say no, after then you will see the vendor name became "different vendors" and code be "********"
(on the vendor tab: you will see two vendors)
To Reverse Landed Cost we do the following with Landed Cost documents that only have one vendor:
I can copy from the Landed Cost document (on the right-bottom corner) while creating new one with
zero amount to reverse, which is ok; but for multiple vendors, the list of vendors onlyshows one of
the vendors for Good Receipts & Landed Cost.
Cannot copy from a Landed Cost document wioth more than one vendor to reverse this Landed Cost.
To be albe to copy from a previously created Landed Cost document (with multiple vendors) as you
can with one vendor to reverse the transaction.
Can this functionality be added to future versions?

Take a look at business area and groupings in they payment program settings...
I am not sure what version you are on but the following link for 4.7 should provide some valuable information...
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/01/a9be64455711d182b40000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/01/a9be64455711d182b40000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
Grouping Open Items and Individual Payments
Wherever possible, the payment program will always group items together for payment.
The payment program can only group together open items for payment if the open items in an account have the same:
1. Currency
2. Payment method in the item
3. Bank in the item
4. Contents of the grouping fields (if a grouping key is specified in the customer or vendor master record)
You can also pay open items from different company codes together, as well as customer and vendor line items.
Items in an account are not grouped together if you:
1. Make payments separately per business area. This procedure entails separate payments being created per business area.
2. Want to make individual payments
Items in which a payment method is specified are not grouped with items in which no payment method is specified.
You define the required grouping key in the IMG for Financial Accounting under Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable -> Business Transactions -> Outgoing Payments -> Automatic Outgoing Payments -> Payment Method/Bank Selection for Payment Program -> Define Payment Groupings.
In our system, if the business area is the same, there will be one ZP document with one line with a posting key of 25. Otherwise there will be many individual 25 posting key lines with.

F-53 - Payment to more than one vendor

In F-53 how to pay to more than one vendor. That is I am making a payment of 20,000 but paying two vendors 10,000 each.

HAI,
It is possible to pay morethan one vendor, using f-53, process should go like this
-In f-53, first fill all the fields along with the total amount you want to pay and one vendor detail
-here, important before selecting 'process open item' , select the 'other accounts' above the standard OIs, chek box
-you will get seperate popup window..there you fill the details of other vendor
-while selecting for clearing the open items, you will get all the open items of both the vendor
- select the required open item and clear the same
chek it once , if any problem i can go further
ramana.v.v

How to create child part from Parent Item - BLOW UP Master - Automatically

Hi to All,
Have any one defined this process?
To create child part from Parent Item - BLOW UP Master - Automatically ie. we receive FG from customer which we need to blow up to its child part. In that case, FG should be consumed & child parts should be generated in stock.
We tried with recursive, but the stock of FG was again generating with recursive.
Ex. FG after receiving from customer in stock 1
Child parts (with offtake 1) X1, X2, X3 in stock zero.
After processing, FG stock should be zero & X1, X2, X3 = 1.
Regards
Nitin

Create a BOM for one of the "child" parts that has the "FG from customer" as a component and all the other child parts are negative quantity components (by products).
To make it simple have all the components backflushed and auto goods receipt the child in the BOM header. Create a production order, then process the confirmation (this will auto goods receipt the 1st child, consume by backflush the "FG from customer" and put the other child parts into stock as by products.
You will need to get your material prices correct first so that there is minimal variance in the production order.

Child part demand for Subcontractor parts not reflecting in SNP

Hi
I have a situation where the demand for child parts are not reflecting in SNP.
The demand for the parent parts are visible in SNP, but the demand in turn is not being reflected against child parts that are Subcontractor parts.
The demand for child parts are visible in R/3 and in Product View (/SAPAPO/RRP3 - Product View) in APO, but not in the planning book.
Please can you assist me.
Thanx in advance.
Keegan

Hi Gaurav
Let me give you further detail to explain the problem.
Child part - A
Parent part - B
Finished Product - C
Step 1 - We purchase part "A".
Step 2 - We supply part "A" to subcontractor supplier,
who after processing part "A" supplies back to us part "B".
Step 3 - We issue part "B" to finished product "C" ,as part "B" is a BOM component for part "C"
The problem we face is that when Demand for part "C" comes through, it in turn places Dependant Demand on BOM compnent part "B".
The APO SNP system then raises Purchase Reqs for part "B" which is placed on our Subcontractor supplier.
However the demand for part "B" is not distributed to part "A" which we need to raise Purchase Reqs for as it is needed to be supplied to Subcontractor to process for us and then in turn supply back to us part "B".
Please advise as to how we can distribute the demand for part "B" to part "A" as there is a 1 to 1 ratio, so for every 1 part "A" we purchase and supply to Subcontractor, we raise a Purchase Req against the Subcontractor to receive back 1 part "B" which we issue to Production order for finished part "C".
Also please let me know what the settings in the R/3 material masters should be for part "A"and "B" on tabs MRP 1, 2, 3 and 4
Please let me know if there is any other info you require from me, to assist me.
Thanx in advance
Keegan

Payment to more than one vendors

Hi Experts,
We have a scenario, in our company, where we need to pay more than one vendors using one cheque. Please guide me how can i process this in system.
Regards

Hai,
You can try this option, go to transaction F-53. fill until bank details, select simulate you will get line item otion then you can select more than one vendor.
You can try the easiet way is go to F-02 complete the transaction.
Regards
Rajaneesh

Subcontracting Assembly Process

Dear gurus,
Just want to get guidance on the process flow of Subcontracting/Outsourcing Assembly..
Our org will still plan the requirements for the materials, inform the OEM (original equipment manufacturer), and supplying the components..
Thank you.

Dear,
Within in-house production if some capacity bottleneck exists in any operations then you can assign this job to some vendors to carryout this job in his premises and supply us the semi-finished part. This can be done via control key example PP02 (external processing control key and activate the subcontracting Check box in routing).
Option1:
1) In Control key PP02 enable external processing and in the routing in the operation detail enable external processing under radio button sub contract.
2) In Order type dependent parameter T code OPL8 enable reservation / PR creation - 3 (immediate reservation / PR creation) during release / confirmation.
3) Create Info record T code ME2O only for vendor no material combination. (You are not going to issue material for the vendor through SAP) system will not allow through ME2O since it is operation subcontract.
4) Run MRP it will not create PR directly since the it is enable in OPL8 only after release.
5) Do the In-house operation then confirm the in -house operation in CO11n. Once the previous operation is confirmed PR is generated automatically.
6) Then Convert PR to P.O. In purchase order only operation description will appear. since no component is assigned. And the order type will be F.
7) Then make separate DC (Gate pass). Consult your MM guy for this.
8) If any component is assigned to the operation. Do stock transfer to Vendor storage location till such time it comes to factory again.
9) While return from vendor do MIGO against the P.O and it will come settle in prod order.
10) Payment to the vendor is through service record entry concept. Consult MM gut for this.
Option 2:
1) You have to create separate material master for that operation. Treating that it will be a different material
2) Create Vendor master with Material and Vendor combination
3) Create BOM with header material and this material as item for the header.
4) Create Routing for the header material with only one operation with control key PP02.
5) Assign the item material to this operation.
6) Run MRP this will create PR automatically. Then convert PR to PO
7) Send material to the vendor through ME2O
8) Do the GR MIGO the item will come have header material and it will automatically update in unrestricted stock.
9) Payment to the vendor will be with different as service entry concept consult MM guy for this.
Hope clear to you.
Regards,
R.Brahmankar

In subcontracting the component quantity consumed more than the BOM quantit

Dear Experts,
In subcontracting the component quantity ( 543) consumed more than the BOM quantity while doing GR, so please let me know what may be the possible reasons for the same.
Regards,
Balu

Balu
may be the suncontractor needed more than the BOM quantiy.It is the case of overconsumption of components.

Forefront is rejecting emails due to content restrictions - more on this subject!

Hi All,
We are running Forefront 2010 with Exchange 2007 on Server 2003.
During the last couple of weeks Forefront has been rejecting emails sent from a couple of domains due to Content Restrictions, the logs says that the emails are above the threshold of 9.
We have tried getting these senders to send just simple emails with no attachments etc and the same still happens. There does not look to be links in email footers etc.
These domains dont look to be on blacklists according to MX Toolbox.
I have put a couple of domains in the content allowed list but I am nervous that we are missing other emails that this system is rejecting. Clearly we want spam blocked but something is odd somewhere if simple text emails from our customers etc are being rejected
as above "9".
Thanks,
Julian

I had made no change whatsoever in my policy.
The only remarkable thing to report was that there was a power failure for my server around the time the problems started.

In subcontracting process same material to come back from vendor how?

hi
in subcontracting process i want to send x material for processing purpose and same material is going to come back tell me the process how can i do
chandra

hii
For ur scenario, u have carried out external service management process.
Because , subcontracting is nothing but , u have to X material and receivea as A materia or some different material.
SO if u r going to receive the same material , u can do it as service process.
Thanks
SAP-MM

Why will some website articles not print preview or print more than part of the document in firefox. I sometimes have to go to IE to be able to print the entire document.

I often want to print an article from a website. Many times when I print preview, it will only show the first, second and maybe last page, but nothing inbetween. I have tried printing it anyway but nothing inbetween will print. My solution has been to go to Internet Explorer where I have then been able to print preview and print the entire article. This is annoying and takes extra time. Is there a setting that I need to make in order to eliminate the problem

Top left (Orange) Firefox button, Print, Print Preview. Does everything look correct? You may also click the icon that looks like a "DISK" to save, which allows you to save it to your computer and CTRL+P will allow you to print.

Payment to more than one vendor Account Number

Hello Experts,
I need an urgent help. I need to show the customer an additional dropdown of all the account holders/numbers of the vendor mentioned in the FK02 transaction for Change Vendor: Payment transactions screen. The account holders mentioned here are not vendors by themselves. This should reflect in the F-58 transaction for Payment with printout. I think in the payee field.
If i just enter values for account holders/numbers in fk02 for a vendor and try to set it in payee field in F-58 while payment, it says "Payee xxx (account holder) not defined in xxx (vendor) for xxx (company code)"
Please someone help me out I have been stuck for quite a while now to break through but no help ... Hoping for a quick response if me requirement is clear ...

Hi Vijay, You are absolutly right, but I am actually not looking for alternate payee ... it was just a thought ...
I just want to display all the alternate account holders with same bank account as mentioned int the bank details of the vendor, in the payment transaction say F-58. Rite now there is no facility to view it but my customer wants a drp-down so that he can select the account to which he can pay ....
eg. the vendor is Bharti Airtel, it may have account holders as Airtel India1,Airtel India2,Airtel India3 all having the same bank account. Airtel India1,2,3 are not created as vendors in the vendor master.
Now this name selected has to printed on the cheque instead of name1 of the vendor.
I am now stuck whether this is possible or i have to write and enhancement in f-58 to include this and program to include this feature.
if there is any help i can get on this will be a great favour.
Regards.

Rejecting subcontracting assembly to 2 or more child part vendors

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for