Reporting discrepancies in Prime 2 wifi

I'm having a problem where running different types of reports I've found that the number of WAPs being reported on changes.
Under a device > detailed hardware the report generated does not include several WAP that are associated to controllers, in this case 5760 controller, some other waps (but not all) appear to be missing from a 2500 controller.
However running a Device>ap summary report this time shows a few (but not all) of the waps on the 5760.
Running the report device>ap dowtime summary all of the waps on the system are shown.
There are some WAPs that are disassociated at the moment, and can be discaounted from some of the reports, but not all of those missing are disassociated are, and I would have expected them to be listed.
Is there any reason why this might be happening?

Hi Afroj,
Thank you for your prompt reply, but I think I must not have put my query across clearly enough (my apologies, I'm still trying to come to grips with Prime).
I'm aware I can customise the Reporting Period. However, when I do so, the report only returns entries for (at most) 3 months. It's as though the appliance is only holding on to the data for that length of time. I'm looking to run a report for as far as a year back, but only get the last 90 days or so.
I'm just looking to configure Prime to retain the data for this length of time.
Best regards,
John P

Similar Messages

  • How can I get CDP neighbor information from access point reports in Cisco Prime 2.0

    How can I get CDP neighbor information from access point reports in Cisco Prime 2.0?  I have looked through all the reports and I cannot find a report that gives me the CDP neighbor information of an access point.  I thought that information was in there, however I cannot seem to find it.
    Thanks in advance!

    Hi
    You can get this from an inventory report in PI (Select Report Type AP). Here is an example of PI 2.1 works for me. Once you export this into excel you can sort based on controllers & filter the single controller connected AP you want.
    Regards
    Rasika
    **** Pls rate all useful responses ****

  • Customized report on Cisco Prime 2.0

    Hi to all,
    I'm searching for a customized report on the Cisco PI 2.0. I'd like to have a report showing an inventory of my APs wit their ethernet mac, radio mac, IP, serial number. I did have a look at the 'device' part available on the Report launchpad  but cannot find what I want.
    Do you know where I can find this kind of report? Or any way to choose the columns I want?
    Thanks!
    Theo

    HI,
    YEs you can do it via PI.
    GO to Report launch pad >Device > Inventory then click on New
    Screenshot:
    Then clcik on Customize.
    Hope it helps.
    Regards
    Dont forget rate helpful posts

  • Reports in Cisco Prime

    Hi,
    I have installed the LMS 4.1 in our network. I would like to generate an Interface_Utilization Report for all the interfaces of the device group I already chose, not just the "Top/Bottom 10", is there anyway to carry out this?
    Thanks in advanced.
    Best regards,
    Laura Herrero

    Hi
    You can get this from an inventory report in PI (Select Report Type AP). Here is an example of PI 2.1 works for me. Once you export this into excel you can sort based on controllers & filter the single controller connected AP you want.
    Regards
    Rasika
    **** Pls rate all useful responses ****

  • CISCO PRIME INFRASTRUCTURE NETFLOW TRAFFIC REPORT

    Hi,
    I have a report from cisco prime infrastructure, that I don´t know how to interpret,  because the fields in the report I don´t know what´s mean them,  the difference between them, what are optimal values, the worse values, etc.
    Can someone help me with this
    The name of the report is: FLEX NETFLOW TRAFFIC TQPQ
    The fields that I don´t know what are:

    hello,
    I also have a problem concerning the interpretation of the report that I got. if anyone knows how Cisco gets its premium reports, it will help me!

  • Cisco Prime Infrastructure - Is there a report of unused switch ports?

    Hello,
    Is there a report in Cisco Prime Infrastructure 1.4 showing the unused switch ports?
    There used to be one in Cisco Prime LMS (Reclaim Unused Up/Down Ports Report).
    Thank you,
    Luke

    Hello,
    I now have Cisco Prime Infrastructure 2.0 running, and I don't see a report like the "Reclaim Unused Up/Down Ports" report that existed in LMS.
    I found one called "Interface Capacity", but it only shows the number of ports that are "connected", "notconnect" or "disabled".
    Does anyone know if a report of Unused ports exists in Prime Infrastructure 2.0 or if it will be available later on?
    Thank you,
    Luke

  • Cisco Prime Infrastructure 2.1 Custom Reports

    Hi, I need to generate a custom Guest User report from Cisco Prime Infrastructure 2.1. It needs to have a couple more fields added to the existing "Guest User Association" report.
    Is it possible to connect to the Cisco Prime Infrastructure Database and Generate custom reports? Is there any documentation on this?
    Thanks

    Programmatic access to PI's data is via the REST API.
    Check the help menu on your PI server to see documentation regarding the supported tables and fields that can be queried via that method.

  • What is your theory on what happened with ASUS Transformer Prime and BB?

    This is my theory:
    First preorder batch 11/22:
    BB opened up for preorders based on expected date of anticipated 12/9 ship date.  The buyers at BB that orders from vendors did not buy any preorder stock from ASUS in Champagne on first order. I gotta bleive that the reason that the Champagne prime is not shipping from BB is a "buyer" error. They filled their first allotment of preorders. That is why BB shiped out grey from the first wave of preorders. Other vendors got both- why did BB only get grey? The buyers always think they know what we want or will order and only ordered grey in the request to ASUS. They got caught with their pants down when Amazon cancelled the orders on 12/2 and EVERYONE affected jumped on BB.com and ordered the champagne which was available as the next wave.
    Amazon fallout 12/2:
    Best buy opened up another set of preorder allotment - 2nd wave, and got hit hard real fast with preorders that they were not prepared for, or had stock for.
    ASUS is filling initial preorder requests from the resellers in the order that the resellers requested too.  BB was offering that in the next wave of preorders, but they probably took too many orders at once, and they put in another order to ASUS around the 12/9 delay ship date and ASUS was not taking them at that time (delays due to Wifi reported) .
    ASUS 12/9 wifi report delay in shiping:
    ASUS was cought in a delay with reports of wifi range problems and either stopped taking orders, or recallled/replaced shipment with others.  Once ASUS took orders again from the reseller they are shipping daily based on the preorder backlog. Asus is responsible for the delay in accepting orders from vendors, and BB had a buyer error, by either waiting too long to put in the first wave of orders, or not ordering enough, and now they are in the back of the vendor reseller line waiting on ASUS to get to them.
    12/19:
    The date of irst ship came and BB shipped all it ordered from first wave and could not get anymore from ASUS in the second wave to cover the Amazon fallout system overload.  They were left in the back of the line of all other vendors becuse no reseller could get a second next wave fulfillment until all others got their first waves fulfilled.  The 12/9 delay kept next waves from being fulfilled, and that is why inventory is trickling into the other resellers and BB can only get a few more at a time.  BB ordered champagne on a next wave delay.
    The thing that bugs me in to no end is how is a person that ordered grey on 11/28 at BB still on backorder, but a 12/05 grey order has shipped and delivered?? This is not ASUS fault, That is poor business operations on BB. 
    That is my "perfect storm" theory- what do you think?  What is your theory?

    That is pretty close to what I think happened.
    It does seem pretty clear that Best Buy never initially ordered and Champagne Primes.  I have combed through the threads at this site and others and haven’t seen one person receive a Champagne Prime from BB.  Meanwhile people who bought from other resellers like New Egg and Amazon have received Champagne Primes. 
    The mismanagement of shipping out orders chronologically has to be maddening for the people who ordered the Grey Primes.  I do feel for these people that ordered the same exact product before others who now have their Prime, but will still don’t have their items.
    The communication from Best Buy had been terrible.  Screwing up the orders in the 2 examples are somewhat forgivable to me, but the miscommunication and what seems to be deceitfulness that Best Buy has exhibited is not.  They just seem not to care about the customer any more.  From my experience, prior to the release I was lead to believe my order would be ready to ship on 12/18.  Then it went on backorder with no real reason why.  Two (12/18 and 12/22) of three calls to customer service reps indicated that my Champagne Prime would still arrive by today (12/23), with the other call rep (12/20) saying she basically had no when my item would be in.  Then yesterday afternoon a post from a customer care rep on these boards confirming that I am basically hosed because I choose BB to fulfill my Prime preorder.  

  • OfficeJet 4620 - cannot connect to wifi

    Hi,
    I took delivery of a new 4620 printer yesterday and have been stuggling ever since to connect it to wifi.
    I'm running Windows 8 Pro 64 bit and have an Asus RT-N66U router (running Tomato firmware v1.28). 
    I've tried a number of different options including:
    Ensuring I downloaded the latest HP software
    Trying the HP Print and Scan Doctor
    Changing the wifi security from WPA & WPA2 to each individually
    Disabled windows firewall
    The error message always the same:
    Issue: Unknown
    Solution: For the latest information about wireless connection to HP printers, plus access to help and support resources, click the link below.
    Any suggestions gratefully received.
    Xav

    Hi,
    Thanks for the response.  I've tried  a few more approaches and think I'm getting closer to isolating the issue.
    The PC I originally tried to install with has Windows Defender and Windows Firewall.  I tried a fresh install with the Firewall disabled but that had no effect.
    I have since tried to do another install using a Samsung NC10 netbook (Win XP Home, MS Security Essentials) and get exactly the same issue.  That said, the netbook is wifi enabled (unlike the PC mentioned above which is wired LAN only) and as such, the software grabbed the settings from the netbook automatically (but still the same error message.  Oddly, it only suggested a WPA connection even when I changed the router setting from WPA/WPA2 to just WPA2.
    I then focussed my attention on the router as two different PC's giving the same error suggests they arent the problem.  Tomato is finding the printer and listing it in the Device List but there is no IP address listed.  This is confirmed on the printer which continues to report that it is not wifi connected.  I've also tried assigning a static IP in the router and rebooting both router and printer but it just doesnt seem to want to assign an address.
    Next I tried manually assigning the IP address in the Advanced Network settings on the printer but no matter what I do, it seems determined to stay stuck on the Automatic Network setting rather than Manual.
    When I printed the Wireless Network Test results, there is a Fail listed again No Filtering and against IP Address it states Not Applicable
    Any other suggestions?

  • BDP-S3100 won't stream Amazon Prime

    If anyone else has had this specific problem and can shed some light I will be very grateful. This bluray player is about a year old.  We've been using it to stream both Netflix and Amazon Prime for the past year.  A few days ago we started having a problem with Amazon Prime.  When the app starts it let's me browse for a show or movie without issue.  I select what I want to watch and then it checks the internet connection.  It reports the speed to be between 30 and 40 Mbps on average.  The problem comes right before it would normally start to stream the video.  It just sits there with the little wheel spinning, usually for about a minute before the message appears - "The network is down." I have checked to see if Amazon Prime is experiencing an outtage.  When the problem first occurred it looked like maybe they were.  One website showed numerous outtage reports for Amazon Prime right after Christmas.  But currently there doesn't seem to be any widespread problem and I've not been able to stream for over a week now. My internet connection is fine.  All other wired and wireless devices are not having any issues. I have reset my cable modem and router.  This did not fix the problem. I have tried a wired and wireless connection to the bluray player.  The problem exists both ways. I have reset the bluray player to its factory settings.  This did not fix the problem. I have confirmed that I'm able to stream Amazon Prime on other devices using the same modem/router.  We can stream Amazon Prime videos on our laptops without issues. That's everything I can think of that we've tried.  I'm starting to wonder if the player has ****** out.  It's just weird that I can browse online content, meaning the player is connecting to the internet, but when it tries to stream a video it fails.

    This is just my personal theory, so please take it with a grain of salt. Sony got hacked right after Christmas and that's when the trouble started.  At first it didn't make sense to me that this would be the cause because Amazon servers would be responsible for streaming my instant video, not Sony's.  But it's rumored that Sony BD devices are routing through Sony services on the way to requesting streaming video from Amazon.  If that is true (and I don't know if it is) then I wonder if Amazon put some additional security measures in place following the Sony hack.  In other words, Amazon says "ok Sony, you obviously have some security issues so we are going to put the kybosh on requests for video coming through you".  End result - Amazon Prime customers can't access streaming video through Sony's BD devices, but they can by just about any other means.  Also, Sony BD devices continue to stream other services like Netflix and Hulu, but just not Amazon Prime. Fast forward a couple of weeks - Sony develops a system udpate that allows their Amazon Prime app to comply with Amazon's new security requirements.  Sony BD device owners (like the poster above) perform the update and voila, they can stream Amazon Prime again. Again, that's just my theory.  I have not heard any of the above from Sony or Amazon.  But tonight I'm going to do the system update when I get home and see if it fixes my issues across the board.  As of this morning it was still very random.  One video willl play and the next won't.

  • Problems getting Prime LMS to start up

    Just got the Cisco Prime Lan NMS software. Getting this error when I try to turn up the appliance after I deployed it in ESXi -
    Power On virtual machine:Failed to power on VM.
    See the error stack for details on the cause of this problem.
    Time: 7/16/2013 9:32:26 AM
    Target: Cisco Prime LAN Management Solution
    ESXi: ucs-c1b4
    Error Stack
    Failed to power on VM.
    Could not power on VM : CPU min outside valid range.
    Group host/user: Invalid CPU allocation requested for VM vmm0:Cisco_Prime_LAN_Management_Solution. (min: 4520 mhz, max: -1, minLimit: -1, shares: -3)
    SharedArea: Unable to find 'testSharedAreaPtr' in SHARED_PER_VM_VMX area.
    This is being deployed on a Cisco UCS B200 M3 with 128GB of ram. There is nothing else deployed on this blade. I elected for thin provisioning on disk storage.
    Wouldnt expect that I would have to tweak the install any.
    Suggestions ?

    5.1 is not supported - only 4.1 and 5.0 (reference). That's most likely the root cause.
    I didn't have any specific information for Prime LMS OVA but even though some folks have reported success with Prime Infrastructure 1.3 on 5.1, the product managers told me at Cisco Live that 5.1 would not be supported until PI 2.0. If they ever release an LMS 4.3 (TBD), it might have ESX 5.1 support.

  • Historical reporting...reports are different?

    I'm looking at 2 reports for a 24 hour period trying to figure out the total amount of calls handled by the system. The reports are:
    Contact Service Queue Activity Report and Traffic Analysis.
    CSQ Activity Report shows the number of calls handled, abandoned, and dequeued. Traffic analysis just shows 1 bar with total calls.
    Even if I add up all the calls from the activity report, it doesn't match the number on the traffic analysis. What's up with this?
    For example - Yesterday I had roughly 1475 calls including about 50 abandoned calls from the activity report. The traffic analysis shows 1741 calls.
    Any ideas?

    Hello,
    Although there exists some bugs regarding Historical Reporting discrepancies, I've found that most of the times the differences are caused just because the different reports show different information.
    For example, the differences between Traffic Analysis Contact Service Queue Activity Report might be because of this:
    The Contact Service Queue Activity Report includes abandoned ICD calls. (This report counts an ICD call as abandoned if the caller hangs up while queued for a CSQ or CSQs). The IVR Application Performance Analysis Report includes abandoned ICD calls and abandoned IVR calls. (This report counts a call as abandoned if the call ends before it is answered by an agent or before it is marked as handled by a workflow.)
    Another example are the the differences between Traffic Analysis and Called Number Summary Report:
    The Traffic Analysis Report will show any new call received into the UCCX system. For example an inbound call from the PSTN will increase the TA report. This new call will also increase the Called Number Summary Report. However, let's say the agent transfers the call to another agent or back to the CSQ. This will add a second call to the Called Number Summary Report but will not increase the TA report.
    I'm not sure if this will explain the difference on your case or all cases, but I've seen it's the one that confuse most people.
    Please check this FAQ which explains each report and that description might give you an idea if the reports really show a discrepancy or they just show different information:
    http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/voice/sw_ap_to/apps_3_1/english/admn_app/hist_rep/hradvch4.pdf
    HTH. If you really think it could be a bug it would be better to open a TAC case.
    Pablo

  • Cisco Prime: Event Larm Port 'x' is down on device.

    Hi,
    I'm writing regarding; event-larms; that is reporting from Cisco Prime; connected to controller. Interfaces is reporting via event-larm; that they are down.
    "Virtual Domain: ROOT-DOMAIN
    PI has detected a change in one or more alarms of category Controller and severity Critical in Virtual Domain ROOT-DOMAIN.  
    The new severity of the following items is Clear:
    1. Message: Port '3' is down on device '10.1.1.2'.
     (6 times)
    2. Message: Port '4' is down on device '10.1.1.2'.
     (6 times)
    3. Message: Port '5' is down on device '10.1.1.2'.
     (6 times)
    4. Message: Port '6' is down on device '10.1.1.2'.
     (6 times)
    5. Message: Port '7' is down on device '10.1.1.2'.
     (6 times)
    6. Message: Port '8' is down on device '10.1.1.2'.
     (6 times)
    E-mail will be suppressed up to 30 minutes for these changes."
    Is there a solution how to not recieve those event-larms? The only LACP interfaces that is configured is 1 & 2, in a group.
    See attached screenshot, when trying to disable the other interfaces.
    The LACP is enabled and configured on "management" interface.
    Best Regards,
    David

    From: https://supportforums.cisco.com/discussion/12077376/prime-infrastructure-alarm-port-down#comment-9405836
    "As far as I understand the error message you only need to disable SSO before you can disable the LAG ports."
    "(Cisco Controller) >config port adminmode 3 disable
    Blocked: Lag is enabled. Disabling the lag port is blocked when system is in redundancy state (SSO)"
    "I would suggest to do this only in a maintenance window."

  • Cisco Prime - extract list of hostnames and their serial numbers.

    Hi all,
    is there a way of extracting a list of hostnames ( for devices in EMEA ) and their associated serial numbers from Cisco Prime and into say a csv file?
    Many thanks,
    Paul

    Hi Paul,
    if you have Prime Infrastructure then  run the below report :
    Report > Report Launch Pad > Device > Detailed Hardware > Detailed Hardware Report Details
    If Prime LMS then :
    Reports > Inventory > Detailed Device
    Hope it will help
    Thanks-
    Afroz
    ***Ratings Encourages Contributors ***

  • Looking for Detailed wifi specs on iPad2 vs 1

    Just read a report form Gartner on the WiFi coverage to accommodate a large scale iPad deployment in the enterprise. They are recommending 300% the radio/AP coverage vs a laptop deployment.
    This is primarily based on the fact that iPad 1 is single stream (1x1)802.11n, and that the WiFi adapter in the ipad is rated at 10mw (10dbm). Whereas a typical laptop 802.11 a/b/g/n is close to 30mw(dbm).
    I was curious if there is a difference in the IPAD 1 and 2 wifi adapters, and what the detailed specs are? I have had a hard time locating this information.
    Link to Gartner report.
    http://www.gartner.com/technology/reprints.do?id=1-17U3I34&ct=111101&st=sg&mkt_t ok=3RkMMJWWfF9wsRoluqjAZKXonjHpfsX%2B7%2BskWq6g38431UFwdcjKPmjr1YIESMB0dvycMRAVF Zl5nQ1KD%2BKUcoVU7fpPAFI%3D

    Register on the developer connection and download the SDK.
    Mylenium

Maybe you are looking for