Requistion Approval Issue for iProcurement Approval Flow

Hi,
The instance details upon which i'm currently working are as follows,
R12 Instance
RDBMS : 11.1.0.7.0
Oracle Applications : 12.1.1
I'm currently working towards resolving an issue where in all the requisitions submitted by a particular user through iProcurement are resulting into the status Incomplete.
After submission by the user the requisition approval workflow is kicked off and the approval request notifications are being sent out.
The approvers have approved the notification as well.
Inspite of all the approvals being gathered for this requisition, the workflow completes but the requisition status is set to Incomplete.
Any pointers as to why this might be the case. Also could you suggest where i need to be looking to resolve this issue.
The workflow i repeat always completes normally.
Any suggestions or advise is much appreciated!!
Regards,
Vishal

Any updates or help on this issue. Right now i'm out of ideas and places to look for to find the root cause that is creating this issue.
Any help or guidance is much appreciated!!
Regards,
Vishal

Similar Messages

  • Table design for approval flow

    Hi,
    For our application,we have to create an approval flow in Java.
    We have to maintain the structure in the database.We are using Oracle 10g and we don't have any DBA access.
    The brief structure is as follows:
    there will be an activity which after being created is allocated some cost.
    After allocating the cost,it goes through a first level approval.
    If approved then it has to go through a second level approval and then the activity becomes approved.
    The full flow needs to be tracked in a table structure whether the activity is created/rejected/approved first level/approved second level.
    In a separate table structure we also need to maintain the hierarchy of user,approval 1 and approval 2.
    Could you please suggest me way outs to maintain the hierarchy as well as the full historical data related to the activity after it is created.

    In the workflow system,One request is created by Specific user who belongs to particular role.  Approver are dynamic currently 5 approvers are available but in future the approver may be 'N' numbers. Each stage the status is different. Approver may
    reject or reopen or query the request.. Based on these status the flow will status again from the requester or approver .suppose 4th approver made any query it should go to 3 approver or 1st requester.
    I need to design the table for the above requirements .please advise with schema.
    The basic table structure should look like as,
    REQUESTOR
    REQUESTOR_ID INT
    REQUESTOR_FNAME VARCHAR(100)
    REQUESTOR_LNAME VARCHAR(100)
    REQUESTOR_EMAIL VARCHAR(100)
    REQUESTOR_ROLEID INT
    REQUESTOR_ROLE
    ROLE_ID INT (PK)
    ROLE_NAME VARCHAR(100)
    ROLE_DESC VARCHAR(300)
    APPROVER
    APPROVER_ID INT (PK)
    APPROVER_FNAME VARCHAR(100)
    APPROVER_LNAME VARCHAR(100)
    APPROVER_EMAIL VARCHAR(100)
    APPROVER_CAT VARCHAR(50) -- IN CASE IF YOU HAVE ANY SUBSYSTEM THEN APPROVER CAN BE CATEGORISED.
    STAGE
    STAGE_ID INT (PK)
    STAGE_NAME VARCHAR(100)
    STAGE_PRIORITY INT -- IF REQUIRED, I.E IF THERE IS ANY STATUS PRIORITY ONE AFTER ANOTHER.
    REQUEST_MASTER
    REQUESTLOG_ID INT (PK)
    REQUESTOR_ID INT (FK) REFER REQUESTOR_ID IN REQUESTOR table
    REQUEST_DESCRIPTION VARCHAR(MAX)
    REQUEST_DATE DATETIME
    APPROVER_CAT VARCHAR(50) (FK) REFER APPROVER_CAT IN APPROVER table -- Email to be send to all approvers under this category.
    REQUEST_STATUS INT FK REFER STAGE_ID IN STAGE ENTITY -- SET A STAGE AS DEFAULT STATUS INITIALLY(SAY NEW). UPDATE this field whenever the history information is updated in REQUEST_HISTORY table.
    REQUEST_HISTORY
    HISTORY_ID INT (PK)
    REQUESTLOG_ID INT (FK) REFER REQUESTLOG_ID IN REQUEST_MASTER TABLE
    APPROVER_UPDATED_BY INT (FK) REFER APPROVER_ID IN APPROVER TABLE
    REQUESTOR_UPDATED_BY INT (FK) REFER REQUESTOR_ID IN REQUESTOR TABLE
    UPDATED_DATE DATETIME
    STAGE_STATUS_ID INT (FK) REFER STAGE_ID IN STAGE TABLE
    Regards, RSingh

  • Fix authorizations for the budget approval flow (internal orders)

    Hi,
    I need to fix the authorizations for the budget approval flow.
    What do I need to take into account?
    Thank you.
    Kind regards,
    Linda

    (1) Each appropriation request should be attached to an investment program (leaf) position. To update the approved budget on the investment program from time to time, you should
        -  make a plan rollup from the appropriation requests to the program positions via IM34 (use an appropriate status selection profile on the initial screen of IM34 and select appropriation requests only to make sure that
           >  only appropriation requests
           >  with status 'Approved' are taken into account),
        -  To budget the investment program via IM32, set view 'Planned total' (Menu: 'Views -> Planned total') and copy this view, which contains the latest approved budget amounts, to the "real" budget (Menu: 'Edit -> Select -> Select all' and then 'Edit -> Copy view').
    (2) You can even generate an order from the appropriation request that enherits the appropriation requests plan value. For details see SAP Library (Menu: 'Help -> SAP Library'), path 'Financials -> IM Investment Management -> Appropriation Requests -> Replacement by a measure for implementation'.  Analogously to step (1), you can also take over the orders 'Planned total' view into the orders budget via txn IM52.
    If you strictly limit the authorisations to execute IM34, IM32 and IM52 as pointed out in steps (1) and (2) to a handful of people who execute these functions as pointed out above (withoud adding or removing budget arbitrarily, of course), the budgeting process
    really focusses on planning/approving appropriation requests which is fully accompanied by the approval workflow.
    Hope above helps you.
    Regards
    Siva

  • Approval Procedure For Issue For Production form

    Hi All,
    How to Defind the Approval procedure For the Issue For Production tell me is it possible or not
    vikas

    Hi Vikas,
    As workaround you can set the approval to the stock transfer for the production warehouse and allow only issue for production from that production warehouse.
    Cheers

  • Approval Flow problem for the newly created user

    Dear friends.
    We have a new user .
    The approval flow is not starting for her shopping carts.
    I have checked YAM to see the cost centre but it is correct.
    What could be the problem and how do i check the workflow.
    I am not much into the technical side of SRM.

    Hi,
    You can use Tx BBP_PD with Shopping cart number, Alo you can view the workflow logs in swi1 or swi2_freq. Then you can check starting conditions
    BR
    Reward if helpful

  • Changing Release Stratergy will affect the current PO approval flow

    Hi Friends,
    I have set the release Stratergy for PO and now I have to change the release stratergy, in this case will I face any issue for the previous PO which is the flow of approval.
    Thanks.
    Dhan

    Go through: SPRO-Material ManagementPurchase OrderRelease procedure for PODefine release procedure for PORelease Indicator.
    In this you will have changeability field, here you have different strategy for changes in release strategy for mapping of the new strategy,value change, etc...
    Please also check the Release Strategies where in, which final release ID is mapped.
    This will gives you idea about what will be possibility for mapping of new release strategy..
    Hope it will help you.
    Regards
    Vikrant

  • Firing an approval flow  - 11G Release2

    Hi,
    I have custom scheduled task for trusted source reconciliation. Depending on the parameters get from the trusted source I must disable user and fire an approval flow. I have no problem with disabling the user, I do it in a PostProcessEventHandler. To fire a approval flow, I should do it inside my Post Process Event handler calling webservizes or I can achieve that with a Approval Policy? Pleace can guide me?Any help is strongly appreciated..
    BR,
    Aliye

    Hi Rajiv,
    The requirement is as follow;
    1. There is a filed in the HR wich tells me if the user is deleted from the trusted source.
    2. In the post process event handler in bulkExecute method I check this field, if it tells me that the user is deleted from the trusted source I disable the user in OIM.
    3. After disabling the user I must fire an approval flow. This flow is not for disable but for deletion the user. In this flow when the approval is done I will delete the user from OIM.
    In my case I don know from where to trigger this flow, I need help on that point...
    Thank you in advance for your help and guide..
    BR
    Aliye

  • SRM 7.0 Approval Flow in Graphical view

    Hi experts,
    I'm upgrading from SAP SRM 4.0 to 7.0.
    In SRM 4.0 I was able to view, in a shopping cart, for example, the approval structure in graphical view and in a table view.
    In SRM 7.0 I can only see the approval flow in a table view. How can I see the approval flow in a grapical view?
    Thank you,
    R Silva

    Hi Silva
    srm 7.0 - Only Table is only AVAILABLE. no more graphical overview in SRM 7.0 on wards.
    SRM 4.0 /5.0 - Table as well as Graphical over view are available.
    graphical overview was not supported in SRM 7.0 on wards as per standard.
    Muthu

  • Approval flow

    Hi
    I have an issue about workflow, I have created the automatic workflow customizing in SWU3.
    But when we receive a bid from our supplier the bid is not approved automatic, I have activated following workflows
    WS 79000002
    WS 79000010
    when I look into TC SWI2_FREQ the error description is
    No Agent Available     
    so how did I get my agent automatic, because we did not want any approval flow.
    Jakob

    Hi Deepti
    This might be right, but it is funny that the configuartion Guide tells us to activate both of them
    furthermore i see this issue in our production and not in D or Q.
    her is the words from the configuartion guide
    You must set up the workflows WS79000010 and WS79000002 in any case, even if you do not intend to use approval steps in your process. These workflows control the system behavior after accepting a bid.
    so did you have an answer why this is not happen in D/Q but only in production?
    Best Regards
    Jakob Bang

  • SSHR Approval flow

    Dear all,
    we've implemented SSHR in our environment ..am stucked with the following scenarios :
    1) approval flow for all the department is like :
    for any employee :
    1) immediate supervisor
    2) HR manager
    3) CEO
    where immediate supervisor is the manager of the employee's department
    what happens if the department manager resigns his/her job.. how we can change temporarly to only HR and CEO. is this a bug related to 4552553.. any idea ?
    2) what could be the chance that the leave admin is not getting the final approval from a manager ?
    Thanks and Please guide
    Kai

    1) This question depends somewhat on how you are modelling the 'immediate supervisor'. You mention that the immediate supervisor is 'the manager of the employee's department'. So - you must either be i) manually assigning the department manager as the employee's supervisor, using the Supervisor LOV on the assignment form or ii) somehow linking an employee to an organization and deriving the 'immediate supervisor' by looking at the org on the employee's assignment and cross referencing to the 'Organization Manager'.
    In case 1), if the supervisor is terminated, it 'breaks' the supervisor hierarchy and, I believe, default AME behaviour is simply to throw an error and give an empty approver list
    In case 2), you must have implemented that through an AME rule and therefore it is really down to how that has been coded.
    I suspect you are using case i) and then have modelled the HR Dept and CEO approvals using a post-approval rule in AME.
    The 'bug' you mentioned (4552553) is relevant but unfortunately, is not a bug, it is an Enhancement Request and so you shouldn't pin any hopes on it. Instead, I recommend you override the default supervisor approver functionality by writing your own AME rule to retrieve an employee's supervisor, returning an empty list if you find that supervisor to be terminated.
    2) I don't understand the question, can you clarify?

  • Display approval flow

    Hi All,
    I want to get idea on which componenet to use to display approval flow i.e. list of approvers. I also have to have functionality to add approvers. so for example I need to show flow as
    person 1 -> person 2 -> person 3
    Thanks,
    Dipal

    Bread crumb?
    af:iterator with the details of each person in each section?

  • Email id attached in another user in approval flow ?

    Hi,
    We have a strange situation in SRM 7.0 approval workflow.
    Suppose we have a user ID AAAA and his mail id is AAAA@adb and the same is maintained in SU01D.
    another user id is BBBB and his mail id is BBBB@abc and the same is maintained in SU01D.
    When CCCC is creating a shopping cart, AAAA triggered as an approver as per the org structure.
    AAAA userid can be seen BBP_PD under approval flow and also in protal.
    But when i click on the name AAAA , it is showing mail of BBBB@abc and approval mail has been triggered to that guy.
    Could any one came across this situation.
    Please let me know.
    Regards
    Venkatesh P

    Hi,
    We can maintain different email ids against the same user under settings
    01. User Account
    02. Under Position tab
    I hope  BBBB@abc  has been maintained against Position.
    Kindly check.
    I hope the above is clear to get points from you.
    Thanks
    Rajesh K

  • PR Cancellation Issue in iProcurement

    Hi,
    My issue is:
    I've raised a PR on 21st and the PR was in approval flow in AME. It sent out an approval mail to one of the approver but he did not respond on it. In the mean time, I cancelled the PR. However, the approval workflow did not stop . After few days, it displayed time out error and sent out another approval mail to the approver.
    This causing lot of confusion.
    Can you please help me in answering why this happened and what can be the possible solution for this?
    Thanks

    See metlalink note for R12 AME Requisition Cancellation Errors: POR_AME_REQ_WF_PVT.Process_Beat_By_First Related [ID 1091262.1]
    It talks of cancel actions against AME Requisitions resulting in an active notification for the Approver. Go thru' the note and apply the patch mentioned.
    Hope this answers your question,
    Sandeep Gandhi

  • Delete Access Issue for a Provisioned Resource in OIM..

    Thank you for the help provided for revoking the resource.I am able to revoke the resource from the User profile details.
    But I have to revoke the resource from the delete access in the same way as I have done for add access for provisioning a resource(means I have to follow the proper flow from approval work flow ,the flow must go to provisioning work flow and from there GIA analyst group should be able to revoke the resource
    (GIA analyst should be able to revoke the resource which has been provisioned and which is provided in the open task ).
    Plz provide the way to overcome the revoking issue.

    Thank you for the information you provided.I have done changes in the rule designer as per the way you told, but still I am not able to revoke the resource.Its completing the approval flow in approval details but Resource is not getting de-provisioned.Please suggest me what needs to be done.
    Plz give me the clear view how to revoke the resource through delete access flow .

  • To Access AME for iProcurement, does the user needs to be set up as a buyer ?

    Hello,
    We are on Oracle R12.1.3.
    We are switching on the Approval Management Engine (AME) for iProcurement and Purchasing.
    we are about to assign the AME responsibilities “Approvals Management Administrator” and “Approvals Management Business Analyst”  to a user , USER123
    Does USER123 need to be set up as a buyer to create AME rules ?
    Regards,
    Natalia

    AME rules for iProcurement are defined for requester. So to test the AME rule itself, you need not be a buyer.
    Besides, configuration responsibility can be granted to any employee (From IT department) who may not be a buyer in the role.
    So the answer is "Not required"

Maybe you are looking for