/SAPAPO/MAT1 customizing

Hi all,
Maybe someone can help me tackle this problem, as I'm not very familiar with SAP APO.
I'm trying to have an authority check on the initial screen of /SAPAPO/MAT1 depending on what "Location" is filled. However, I can't seem to find any user exit or enhancement that could help me do this...
Has anyone had this sort of problem before and knows how to handle it?
Thank you very much in advance!!
Adi

Hi Somnath,
Thanks for your reply
The thing is that I need to do a Supply Network Planner (SNP) authority check only for some certain locations. I think that if I only use the APO Authorization Object you gave me, it will do it always for all of the locations. However, I would like to do it for 2 specific ones for example; which is why I asked for a user exit or something where I can actually check the location first, and then call the auth. object.
Have any clue? Thanks!
Adi

Similar Messages

/N/SAPAPO/MAT1 question

Hello Guru,
i have a question on tcode /N/SAPAPO/MAT1, in the extra tab we have a field (Dem Exclu. from SS) can anyone of you know what is the use of this field? can it affect the demand requirement planning in APO?

Hi,
Please follow below path to add/check custom fields in Product Master(MAT1).
SPRO -> SAP SCM - Implementation Guide> Advanced Planning and Optimization>Master Data--> Maintain Freely-Definable Attributes
AT*     --> /SAPAPO/MATLOC (Extra Attribute section in EXtra Tab in MAT1)
ATT*     --> /SAPAPO/MATKEY (Additonal data section in Properties Tab in MAT1)
ATTL*     --> /SAPAPO/LOC     (Addit.Tab in LOC3)
Hope this info will help you.
Thank you
Satish Waghmare

DP cluster filed in transaction /SAPAPO/MAT1- Extras

Hello Experts,
Can you please let me know if the field DP cluster is a standard field in the transaction /sapapo/mat1 under Extras tab.
Meaning Transaction : /sapapo/mat1
Tab : Extras/Extra attributes
field : DP cluster
I would like to know if the field DP cluster is a standard field in the transaction /sapapo/mat1.
Thanking you all for your support in advance,
Warm Regards,
gayatri.

Hi Gayatri,
The fields on the tab "extra" and standard but customised.
Go to SPRO >
SCM Basis
Master Data
Maintain Freely-Definable Attributes
You can see some attribute for the product, the location and the prodcut location.
From here you should see your DP cluster.
For sure the field is not populated automatically, it is either populated manually or via enhancement. The later is more likely.
I hope it helps
Thanks and Regards
Julien

COM - error Unknown in /sapapo/mat1 transaction

Hi,
I am using SCM 4.1 and LiveCache 7.5.0.
In the transaction /sapapo/mat1 i select a product and its location.
Then in the Extras Menu when i select Where-Used List, it shows the message "COM - error Unknown"
COM - error Unknown
Message no. /SAPAPO/OM001
Diagnosis
A COM routine has encountered a program error.
System response
The program will be terminated.
Procedure
Start the program again.
If this message appears again, contact your system administration.
Please help me on this.
Regards,
Chintan

hi - try running the livecache consistency check (/n/sapapo/om17) for product-locations and correct any errors that may be detected and try again to use the where-used functionality.
Regards
Vinod

Log changes in /SAPAPO/MAT1 - Product

Hello,
anyone knows if there is a modification log for product master data in SCM for changes done in /SAPAPO/MAT1 - Product ?
We have CIF to create and update product master data from R3 to scm but we have field Forward Consumption Periodo changed and it is ok in R3 so It must have been changed directy in SCM.
Is there any way to see changes in this system?
Tkanks,
Teresa Lopes

Teresa,
It is possible - if change document logging is turned on. In SCM, the system is delivered with the logging turned off. You must explicitly turn it on in order to be able to review changes.
Product master changes can be reviewed in transaction /SAPAPO/PROD_CD_READ. Do not leave product or location blank, use asterisk instead for 'wild card'.
If nothing is found, then logging is not turned on. You can confirm by looking at table CDHDR, where the change data is stored.
To turn change recording 'on', IMG > APO > Master Data > Product > Activate change documents.
Best Regards,
DB49

Difference between material(/SAPAPO/MAT1) & material(/SCWM/MAT1)

Hi Experts,
I am new to EWM & I am confuse between Product(/SAPAPO/MAT1)
& Product(/SCWM/MAT1) ?.
Please anyone outline me some brief about above to product in EWM.
Regards,
Rock

Hi Rock,
In order for the Product to be relevant for the EWM system you need to maintain only the /SCWM/MAT1 - Maintain Warehouse Product transaction. There you will find the screen tabs that are relevant only for EWM. All the tabs that have the little hat came automatically from the CIF from the ECC system and all those that do not have the hat are the ones strictly relevant for the EWM system so these are the only ones that you need to maintain.
As I mentioned earlier, the /SAPAPO/MAT1 - Maintain Product transaction is for APO and does not make a product relevant for the EWM Warehouse.
All the best,
Claudiu Maxim

Base UoM in /SAPAPO/MAT1

Hi Folks,
Is it possible to change the Base Uom in the /SAPAPO/MAT1?
I have bussines requirements where the ECC (R/3) material has to be changed to diff base Uom (it is not used yet).
now this chagnes will fo to APO through CIF but the CVC is created in APO and that's the reason it is failing in the CIF.
my integration model fails and i can not chagne the Uom in /SAPAPO/MAT1.
Is there anyway i can chagne the base Uom in APO.

Charlie, I think the easiest way is to delete the material in APO and re-cif.
/sapapo/mat1. Pull down menu Product > Flag for Deletion > Deletion Flag: Location Product.
The pop-up will ask delete immediately yes/no, choose yes. Then re-cif from R/3.
If you have dependent objects, like orders, transportation lanes, ppm/pds then you have to delete those too. From version 5.0 the wuf transaction helps identify these.
Chris

APO /SAPAPO/MAT1 Authorization with check based on SNP planner

Hello,
We want to maintain authorization profile enabling to have a filter on /SAPAPO/MAT1 based on the value of the SNP Planner.
Standard transaction PFCG does not brings back the SNP Planner as being a checked object when using /SAPAPO/MAT1 in the menu
So, I used transaction SU24 and changed the setting for /SAPAPO/MAT1 : I added the authorization object C_APO_PLNR SNP Planner with check indicator "Check" and proposal "YS" . The status is now green for this object but I do not have understood if I had also to maintain TSTCA column "status: check at transaction start". In any case, I did not found how to activate it.
With this setting, I also competed with PFCG the required value for SNP Planner.
Result: it does not work. Could some one help ?
Regards,
Christine

Hi Christine
Please check OSS Note 1464451 (Authorisations in APO Master Data). I dont think you can directly use SNP Planner as a basis for authorization without an enhancement.
RIshi Menon

/SAPAPO/MAT1

Hi Guys,
I have product number with me , and now i want to see the location attached to it , but in /SAPAPO/MAT1 when i press F4 i am getting list of all , location so tell me how to check what are the locations aplicable to this product.
Regards

Hi ,
Go by as suggested by senthil ,
Enter transaction /sapapo/rrp3
enter planning version as 000
enter your *product number * and
press F4 in llocation field it will show you the applicable location.
If you havent find any , it means that your product is maintained globaly but not extended to any specific location
Hope it helps you.
Regards
Ritesh

Custom tab in MAT1

Hi Experts,
can you explain me how can I add a new custom tab in /SAPAPO/MAT1 in EWM?
Thanks
Alessandro

Hi ,
Search for a screen exit or Badi SQL trace with object
V_EXT_ACT ..In SPRO search for BADI .

Crossdocking in EWM - Vendor to Customer via Company Warehouse

Hi All
We have below scenario.
1). Customer places order. 2). Company places order to vendor to satisfy the customer order. 3). Vendor delivers to company. 4). Company ships to customer without keeping the stock in warehouse.
As I know cross-docking is a technique where we reduce the logistics expense by saving transportation and/or storage space. So, can I call this as one of the cross-docking scenario? If so, what it is in terms of SAP (EWM)?
For sure, it is planned one but not transportation cross-docking since source and/or final destinations are not internal Warehouses. Is it Merchandise distribution? FYI, my client industry is not retail.
In IMG, SCM Extended Warehouse Management > Extended Warehouse Management > Cross-Process Settings > Cross-Docking (CD) > Merchandise Distribution > Basic Settings for Merchandise Distribution. Here, there are few steps given for implementing Merchandise Distribution. Are there any other activities to perform? Please help.
Thanks
Sasidhar Gupta

Hi Sasidhar
Please find below points for your help and give more idea too.
Inbound Driven
When you create warehouse tasks for putaway, EWM checks whether ODO items exist that match the task items with regard to quantity and expiration date. Then, instead of creating the putaway warehouse task, EWM creates a cross-docking warehouse task with reference to the ODO item. EWM also checks during the putaway warehouse task creation to see if the stock in open pick warehouse task is less adequate (in terms of FIFO or FEFO) for the ODO item than the stock to be put away (unless the warehouse task is relevant for a material flow system). If so, EWM cancels the open pick warehouse tasks and creates a new cross-docking warehouse task with reference to the same ODO item.
Activating Opportunistic Cross-Docking
The opportunistic cross-docking functionality is coded within example BAdI implementations.
This means that you have to implement these BAdIs by copying the example class to activate the functionality. To activate the opportunistic crossdocking,you must perform the steps described in this section. Creating Implementations for Cross-Docking BAdIs
The BAdI for opportunistic cross-docking inbound can be activated in the EWM IMG by following the menu path Extended Warehouse Management • Business Add-Ins (BAdIs) for Extended Warehouse Management • Cross Process Settings • Cross-Docking (CD) • Opportunistic Cross-Docking • EWM-Triggered Opportunistic Cross-Docking • Opportunistic Cross Docking Inbound.
There you must create an implementation of this BAdI using example class /SCWM/
CL_EI_CD_OPP_INBOUND and activate the implementation. The BAdI for opportunistic cross-docking outbound can be activated in the EWM IMG via the menu path Extended Warehouse Management • Business Add- Ins (BAdIs) for Extended Warehouse Management • Cross Process Settings
Creating a Product Type Group and Product Group
Activating Opportunistic Cross-Docking at the Warehouse Level
Because the picking warehouse task for opportunistic cross-docking will be created
for inbound stock that is still assigned the stock type for stock received on dock but not yet put away , you need to maintain the EWM stock determination (for more details about the stock
determination, needs to be maintained within the stock determination for the relevant stock determination group for cross-docking.
To start, you must first maintain a new stock determination group for cross-docking
in the EWM IMG by following the menu path Extended Warehouse Management • Cross-Process Settings • Stock Determination • Maintain Stock Determination Groups.
Next, you must permit the inbound stock type for an ODO item that
has the normal stock type assigned. To specify the stock determination in the EWM IMG, follow the menu path Extended Warehouse Management • Cross-Process Settings • Stock Determination • Configure Stock Determination.
Finally, to activate opportunistic cross-docking for products, you must assign the product group (the one that you created in the previous steps) to the products in the Properties 2 tab of the SAP APO view of the product master.
Transaction code /SAPAPO/MAT1.
If you have configured the stock determination as described previously, you also need to assign the Stock Determination Group in the Warehouse Data tab of the warehouse product. tcode code /SCWM/MAT1.
Regards
Suraj

PP Tasklist - Custom fields in Routing HEADER

Hi,
I have activated the User Exit enhancement IAIH0001. I have included the custom fields to the User exit Screen 3011. I have also activated function exits to transfer to & from the SAP screen.
But I am not able to access the Custom Screen from CA01 or CA02. There is no function code or PF Status menu path to access Custom screen fields.
Should I use someother user exit? I appreciate any suggestions.
Thanks,
SG
Edited by: Sakthi Ganesan on Feb 11, 2011 9:10 PM

Please see:
Adding Custom Fileds in /SAPAPO/MAT1
Rob

R/3 To APO , customized material master data Transfer

Hello All,
i am having an issue , that we need to add two customized fields (PUP price and Std Price) in /SAPAPO/MAT1, Extra Tab.
i have added these fields on screen and the output structure for them is assigned as /SAPAPO/MATIO-zverpr, and /SAPAPO/MATIO-zstprs.
in R/3 Side -I have added these two fields as in CIFMTLCCUS structure, with Include CI_MTLCCUS (custom structure to transfer data).
also i have fteched these filds from table MBEW and have mapped to Table ot_cif_matloccus of Include ZXCIFU01 of Enhancement CIFMAT01.
In APO side -but the thing left is that i am not able to find the Mapping Structure in APO side for these fields.
i have added these fields to Structure /SAPAPO/CIF_MATLOCCUS (Customer Enhancement Structure for /SAPAPO/CIF_MATLOC), but i didnt find any custimzed place to retrieve and Map to /SAPAPO/MATIO.
please suggest the necessary/missing steps.
Thanks in Advance.
Nitin
Edited by: wisetak on Jun 24, 2011 2:54 PM

Check these three thigns
/n/sapapo/CCR
/n/sapapo/CQ
Check what type of stock has active IM, and what type of stock went in after you created the GR.
Still if you have any problem let us know.
My

Field /SAPAPO/MARM-GEWEI unit missing for product 000000008660000814 PAL

Hi Experts,
I found CIF error in SMQ2. The error states "Field /SAPAPO/MARM-GEWEI unit missing for product 000000008660000814 PAL '.
I checked the data in MM03 , where alternate unit of measure is PAL. One PAL Is 96000 EA.and i found GRoss Weight and NET Weight is showing Zero.
I checked the same in /sapapo/mat1 , it is showing 1PAL = 5760 ea.and i found GRoss Weight(2, 078.440 and NET Weight(1,800.32) .
How to rectify thsi error. Please let me know.
Thanks,
Manasa.

Hi Rishi,
Thanks. Please check teh OSS Notes Note 1519355 - Field /SAPAPO/MARM-GEWEI unit missing for product and advice me.I am pasting the same notes below.
Summary
Symptom
Field /SAPAPO/MARM-GEWEI unit missing for product
Other terms
/SAPAPO/MAT067, UOM
Reason and Prerequisites
The reason of the error is, that the 'Unit of Weight' is missing for the alternative unit of measure(UOM) in the material Master Data.
Solution
From R/3 perspective,
If no gross or net weight is maintained in a unit of measure, it is not nessesary to maintain a unit of weight. However CIF in APO checks the field GEWEI for all entries of table MARM. If the field GEWEI is blank in any of the MARM entries then you will get the error message . The following are ways to correct this error;
1) Delete the alternative UoM in APO for the product in /sapapo/mat1. Afterwards process the faulty queue and all alternative UOMs will be correctly available in APO and thus, the masterdata is consistent.
2) Maintain the 'Unit of Weight' that is missing for the alternative units in the material masterdata in R/3. Afterwards retransfer the masterdata to APO.
3)use the userexit EXIT_SAPLCMAT_001 (where you can change
MARM and MARMX values) and maintain the missing 'Unit of Weight'so that MARM-GEWEI is filled before transfering the masterdata to APO.

Sapapo/sdp94 - GR/GI issue problem

Dear Experts,
After doing a deployment run by sapapo/sdp94, it is creating a process goods issue record. Actually it shouldnt create as per standard. Because in /sapapo/mat1 GI processing time filed is blank. When it has value it should show the process goods issue record.
Can any one have ideawhy it is creating process goods issue in sdp94 when we look product view.
My observation is that there is one field activity type is setting with "i" what does it mean?
Please respond , its very urgent
Thanks
Cris

Thanks for your reply...Exactly i am doing as you said.
As per my knowledge without GI issue time in mat01 it shouldn't create the process goods issue in sdp94 when we run the deployment.
But for me it is creating, I couldn't find why it is happening>
Pls welcome your suggessions.....
Thanks
Cris

/SAPAPO/MAT1 customizing

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for