Scenario regarding Split Valuation

Dear Experts,
I have a scenario related to materials having Split Valuation.I have Material Master having Valuation Types : Good_Stock,Refurbished_Stock & Defective_Stock.There is no issue with Valuation Types Good_Stock,Refurbished_Stock as they should be valuated & Accounting Entries should be generated during Material Movements.But I have issues with Valuation Type Defective_Stock.My requirement is if any material movement will be taken place with Valuation Type Defective_Stock, Accounting entry should not be generated.
Separate Valuation class is assigned as per the Valuation types.I had tried with OBYC after removing the corresponding G/L & make a blank entry with Valuation Class & Valuation Modifier with required transaction keys, but system is not allowing to do any material movement with the same.Please advice.
Regards,
Soumick

Hi frnddz...
Posting the stock of the material after GRN in quality inspection has nothing to do with the Split valuation.
To post the stock of the material, maintain the qualitty management view of the material.
Or set the "post Quality inspection" tick in purchasing view / quality management view.
If you set the "post Quality inspection" tick,
then after doing GRN stock will be posted to inspection stock.
Then you have to do MVt - 321 in transaction MB1B to post the stock in un-restricted.
Regards,
Amit P Hiran
njoy SAP...
Njoy Lyf...

Similar Messages

Problem regarding Split Valuation

Dear Experts,
I have a scenario related to materials having Split Valuation.I have Material Master having Valuation Types : Good_Stock,Refurbished_Stock & Defective_Stock.There is no issue with Valuation Types Good_Stock,Refurbished_Stock as they should be valuated & Accounting Entries should be generated during Material Movements.But I have issues with Valuation Type Defective_Stock.My requirement is if any material movement will be taken place with Valuation Type Defective_Stock, Accounting entry should not be generated.
Separate Valuation class is assigned as per the Valuation types.I had tried with OBYC after removing the corresponding G/L & make a blank entry with Valuation Class & Valuation Modifier with required transaction keys, but system is not allowing to do any material movement with the same.Please advice.
Regards,
Soumick

Hi,
I doubt accounting entry generation can be controlled at valuation type level. Since this depends on the material type you are using.If the value update has been marked for the material type in the respective valuation area , accounting entry will be generated.

Split Valuation with two Standard Cost

Hello,
I have one question regarding split valuation where i need to keep both the valuation type as standard price, in that case how to calculate and release cost for valuation type. Logically keeping both is not pheasible. But want your experience how this is beed handled by others.
Thanks

Hi,
If one material has split valuation, standard price will be released only for header segment (valution type blank). You have the possibility to release standard price for in-house production segment, if you set the 'Default'-flag in the customizing transaction for splitted val. (OMWC) for the val. category 'X'.
Please read the note 552486 that contains information about this context.
Alternatively you might create a mixed cost estimate to release prices for each procurement alternative that is associated with a val. type.
The only way to mark and release a standard costing per valuation type is by using the functionality of mixed costing. That means that you have to define a quantity structure category and define a procurement alternative based on a valuation type of your material. Afterwards you have to define a mixing ratio for your material and the defined quantity structure category.
Based on this master data (procurement alternatives and mixing ratios) it is possible to carry out a mixed costing, one part of this mixed costing should be a cost estimate based on your valuation type. If you mark and release the mixed cost estimate the system will set the standard price on valuation type level (prerequisite: you have defined the procurement alternative based on the valuation level).
regards
Waman

Split Valuation = Example

Hai,
Can some one please give me a realtime example or scenario of Split valuation, LIFO &FIFO valuation? Do v have any case study for this? Please help.
Thanks in advance,
J. Sriram.........!

Split valuation - say there is one plant in India and other in Indonesia and material fr both the plants is procurred from a vendor based in India . Thus the price of same material in two different plants will be different ( it will be costly in Indonesia as it has to be exported from here) very common in terms of garment industry apparel manufacturing industry. Thus we use split valuation to have diferent valuaution of same material at different valuaution areas .
Fr this initially the material master is created with Mvg avg price V and the split values can be either V or S

Partial delivery without GR Based IV in split valuation scenario

Dear,
We are using split valuation for our materials.
I'm reading on http://help.sap.com/saphelp_di46c2/helpdata/EN/47/61017e49f011d1894c0000e829fbbd/frameset.htm the following sentence:
In the case of partial deliveries for a purchase order, you can only valuate each partial delivery separately if goods-receipt-based Invoice Verification has been defined in the purchase order (the field GR based IV must be selected on the order item screen). If goods-receipt-based Invoice Verification has not been defined, the valuation type that you enter for the first partial delivery is binding for the following partial deliveries.
We have the requirement to valuate partial deliveries separately.
We can however not switch on the GR-based IV flag. The business scenario requires the invoice posting to Goods In Transit to be done before the Goods receipt booking.
Moreover, additional unplanned delivery costs need to be debited to the PO lines after the initial invoice posting, which is not possible in a GR-based IV scenario. (GR quantities can only be invoiced once)
How can I separately valuate partial deliveries without switching on the GR-based IV flag?
Thanks for your swift reply.
Simon

Hi Ravi and Yann,
Thank you for your inputs. OSS note-956083 can not be applied in my case due to the hight system version (patch level 550).
I have already raised this issue to SAP, but in the lack of proper infrastrucure SAP can not access the system. (BASIS guys are still struggling with it)
Well...let me give you recap-
We have not activated nor implemented any BAdi so far (Vanila SRM 5.0 EC scenario) PO creation for goods is working fine and as desired. But when it come across with PO with limit item or services, system throws an error as -
"PO 5100000263: Service-based invoice verif. requires GR "NO" or G R-based invoice verif."
Would deeply appreciate if you guys can share insight on this issue.
Thank you for your assistance!

Split valuation for material

Dear all,
I'm facing issue when trying to assign "Valuation category" to Material in Material master Accounting view.
Purpose of doing this is to achieve split valuation. But system is blocking me to do that due to PO created for the material before.
Refer below that steps happen for the scenario:
1. Material 123 created without split valuation.
2. Create PO 999 for the material 123, follow by full GR of qty 10 and eventually "delivery completed" marked for the material.
3. Using MIGO movement 261 to perform GI qty 10 for production usage.
4. Now Production order has been finished, and wish to bring back the qty 10 to Non-valuated stock.
5. Goto MM02 change Material 123 to assign "Valuation category" in Accounting view. Error returned by system " Purchase order 999 item 00010 already exist".
For the case, do you know how to get rid of the error in order for me to assign "Valuation category" after PO has been created for the Material?
Please comment.

Hi,
Have you activated Split valuation ???? Before using valuation category.
the process you followed is correct. Now the stock is 0.
You need to configure Split Valuation :
1.To use split valuation, you have to activate it using TCode 'OMW0'.
2.To select split valuation ('OMWC'), proceed as follows:
2.1. Determine the valuation categories and valuation types that are allowed for all valuation areas:
- global valuation categories via menu "Goto --> Global Categories"
- global valuation types via menu "Goto --> Global Types"
2.2. Allocate the valuation types to the valuation categories.
a) Select "Goto --> Global Categories".
b) Position the cursor on a valuation category and select
"Goto --> Global Categories --> Assignments --> 'Types->Category'".
c) Activate the valuation types you want.
2.3. Determine the local valuation categories for each valuation area.
a) Select "Goto --> Local definitions".
b) Position the cursor on a valuation area and select
"Goto --> Local Definitions --> Allocate Categoires->Org.units (button Cats->(OU)".
You obtain a list of the global valuation categories.
c) Activate the categories to be used in this valuation area.
The system creates the local valuation types based on the allocations under point 2.2.
Now you assign the Valuation Category in Material MAster Accouinting View.
Hope this is useful for you.
Regards,
Smitha

GR for a STO with SD delivery and Batches with split valuation X

Hello,
We have a problem with the Goods Receipts for Stock Transfer Orders between plants for materials subject to batch split and split valuation with valuation type X.
The scenario is very similar to the one explained on this thread: STO:problem with batch valuated material
When creating the the STO, it automatically sets a valuation type that is not be the appropriate one, we cannot use only one valuation type per position because we can use more than one batch (and valuation type). The outbound delivery has the correct valuation types for each batch and material but when doing the GR at the receiving plant, it only takes into account the valuation type indicated in the STO with no chance to change it.
I have seen the Note 212532 but we are not working with active ingredients.
Does anybody know a useful EP to use?
Thanks in advance for your help.
Regards,
Javier.

Well, we can change the valuation type before Posting the goods issue of the delivery, but in most cases we need more than one batch (each batch has a different valuation type) for each item (material) in the purchase order.
We can do this at delivery level but the GR only takes into account the valuation type of the purchase order.
Thanks.

Batch and split valuation simultaneously

hello all,
we have scenarios in which both batch management and split valuation is active.
we are currently uses STO with stocktransport order by using 351 and 101 movements.
my question is that
why the sap system does not allow plant to plant stock transfer by using 303 and 305 movement type when both batch management and split valuation is active?
is this is a sap standard best practice?
pls explain in detail.
regards
sumit simran

HI,
try following sap note
66953 Stock transport order for split-valuated material
801097 Stock transport order with split valuation
Regards
Kailas Ugale

How to deactivate Split valuation functinality for a Stock Material

Hi All,
I have one issue on Split valuation like by mistake user has extended the material with the Valuation category and he has extended to one Valuation type and received a stock with this valuation type.
Now they want to deactivate this split valuation functionality for this material, Can any one tell me the prerequisite process for this scenario?
Regards,
Nag

Hi Nag,
Maybe you can change it - I'm not 100% sure since I have never done such thing.
But:
- Please eliminate transactonal data (delete all of them)
- Remove the stock in current and previous period (possible via MB1A + 201 + posting date)
- Archive the views of your material master (records in MBEW) with valuation types
- After removing the views with valuation type, hopefully you can remove valuation category
Changing the field and trying to save SAP will give error message > click on appearing 'Display Errors' buton > you will get information about what hinders you from being able to execute the change > eliminate these problems
This is just my opinion.
BR
Csaba

Process order based on split valuation

Hi Experts,
I have a scenario where the same HALB material in the plant can be of 3 different grades.
Accordingly, if I do a split valuation based on the 3 grades, how can I ensure that while creating a process order on the HALB, depending on the grade (and hence the valuation type) the system picks up the recipe from an available collection of 3 different recipes (for the 3 types)?
Regards
Sm.

Hi
Just go to CT04 and creat three characterstics with grade 1,2 & 3 or as u wish. You can give single value to identify the grade say 1,2,3
go to CL02 and creat class using material class as class type .
Assign these three characteristics to this class
go to mm01 and type the halb and extend the classifcation view
specify the class that is created.
go to bom and in the HALB line item delete it. and create new line item using k as item category and save the bom
now when you creat configuration profile using cu40 and make sure you can use it in production
after this try creating a production order the system will prompt for characteristics use your grade and proceed for production
Krishna

Split Valuation : Different procurement type and different origin

Hi ,
I have the following scenario :
The company has a plant in Dibrugarh and another in Plant Raipur .
It deals with product called SIG .
SIG is manufactured at Dibrugarh but sent to Raipur. So we have different valuation for the same material at two different plants . Now the second scenario is this product SIG is also procured from the domestic market as well as imported . This externally procured SIG either from domestic market or from foreign country is also sold to the customer. So what would be the valuation of this SIG . How many valuation types should it have . And what are the mandatory settings at two plants .
Regards
Nandini

Hi,
Split Valuation process is useful when the materials have to be maintained with more than one value based on certain criteria like
The following are some reasons for which Split valuation is used
Different origins of the material
Different grades of quality for the material
Different statuses for the material
Differentiation between in-house production and external procurement
Differentiation between different deliveries
In your case;
Split Valuation process is useful when the materials have to be maintained with more than one value based on certain criteria like
Imported materials and local material based on the origin of purchase so that the valuation of the final product manufactured can be valuated accordingly
For Activating Split valuation certain settings have to be done in customization and in the Material Master record.
Activate split Valuation for the Valuation area (In SAP standard system the split valuation is set as active by default)
MENU: - IMG  Materials Management  Valuation and Account assignment  Split Valuation Activate Split valuation
Define Valuation Category and Valuation type for the material in the customization
MENU: - IMG  Materials Management  Valuation and Account assignment  Split Valuation Configure Split Valuation
Note : Valuation category specifies which criterion should be used as the basis for differentiating between the various partial stocks ( origin, quality, production etc)
*The valuation type specifies an individual characteristic of a partial stock ( Origin u2013 imported/local , Quality u2013 (high/low) Etc)*

Split valuation for Finished Goods - Target cost was not updated

Hi,
We are following split valuation for 'Finished goods'.
Valuation typte 1 is for 'manufacture' and
Valuation type 2 is for 'External procurement'
For production orders with this material, we are not getting target costs. It is showing zero.
We have done release of standard cost estimate before creation of production orders and goods receipt for these orders. But still it is not updating.
Pls guide me.
Regards
MadhuSekhar Gupta

Hi,
Thanks for your reply.
At the time of variance calculation only the credit part of target cost will update and at the time of goods receipt debit part of the target cost will update.
Our client has done goods receipt but debit part of the target cost was not updated. and the order status is DLV.
I simulated the scenario in QAS by creating new finished goods materials (Industry-Construction) one is with split valuation and another is without split valuation, then the debit part of target cost was updated at the time of goods receipt and credit part was updated at the time of variance calculation for both the materials. So this problem was not arised because of split valuation.
Was this problem arising because of the material master data, because for one material it is updating and for another it is not for the same configuration?
Regards
MadhuSekhar Gupta
Edited by: gms gupta on Oct 22, 2011 3:39 PM
Edited by: gms gupta on Oct 22, 2011 3:41 PM

Split valuation for Finished goods.

Hello All,
I have an FG which is produced inhouse and also subcontracted.
While implementation the subcontracting scenario was never considered.
Now we have stocks and production orders for that FG and hence split valuation cannot be activated.
Is there any other way out so that I can value the stock seperately for inhouse production and subcontracting in the current situation.
Regards
Vijay Singh.

hi
Split valuation is used for maintaining two different price for same material.
ex:-if you are manufacturing a material, ur manufacturing "X" price is Rs.100/-> But you got order of 100T. But you plant manufactruing capacity is 50T,But you do not want to lose the order,so you procure material "X" from vendor at Rs.110/- to meet customer demand.In this case you have use Split valuation ie.....same material but maintaining two different prices.
The Split Valuation settings are as follows:
1.SPRO> MM>VALN AND ACC ASSIGNMENT> SPLIT VALUATION> Acitvate Split Valuation
2.SPRO> MM>VALN AND ACC ASSIGNMENT> SPLIT VALUATION> Configure Split Valuation
Click on Golbal type: create your own valuation types as Type 1, Type 2 etc
Click on Global categories:create your own Valuation Category as Type(T) and
Activate all valuation types(Type1, Type2 ) for your category(T)
regards
kunal
award if helpful

Split valuation type pick up in MRP run according to BOM

Dear experts,
We are starting to use split valuation scenario. Initially we have customize split valuation as standard i.e.
1) Creation of valuation type
2) Creation of valuation category
3) Assignment of cat. and type.
4) Local definition.
5) Assignment of valuation category in material.
6) Extend material with valuation type.
What i have customized and tested is working fine. Recently our user have a requirement that, valuation type field should be available in BOM for their clear understanding. Accordingly we have enhance the BOM screen and added valuation type to be choose by user during BOM creation. exit used PCSD0002.
Now here is issue.-
I have parent X and its child Y with valuation type SKF, BOSCH and NRB. I have fixed/specify valuation type BOSCH in BOM. If we run MRP for the parent, system should have to create purchase requisition for child with only specified valuation type in BOM i.e. with BOSCH in this case.
Note - We cant use default proc. valuation type in customization as customer requirement is frequently changes also user specified that, system must have to select valuation type specified in BOM and create proposals accordingly both for PIR and dependent requirement.
Please suggest.
With best regards,
Manish K. Bachate

Hi
You would be very much able to valuate both the stocks separately with what I have recommended
But, with what you are doing, you wont be able to... Reason being, once you release std cost for the externally procured item, say, 5 USD... It will keep on valuating the item at 5 USD only.. Any price other than 5 invoiced by the vendor would hit the Price diff account OR you will have to revise your std cost every time the vendor changes his price
Ideal way would be to keep price control V in the valuation type "External Proc"... With this, you dont need to release std cost for it and also it would valuate the stock at whatever price supplied by the vendor.. Whether 5 or 6 USD
> To summarize, what I am recommending is this
> 1. Your material in this case will have 3 accounting view... [One parent view and One view for IN HOUSE and one for "External Proc"
> 2. Parent view will have Price control V, IN HOUSE will have S and External Proc has V
> 3. In IMG settings for split valuation, earmark IN HOUSE for internal proc and External Proc for purchase
With this
1. Your IN HOUSE stock will be valuated at std cost released by CK24
2. Your External Proc stock will be valuated at the price supplied by the vendor
Hope this helps!!
Regards
Ajay M

Split valuation - Header Material - Price det. 3 - Matl. ledger active

Hi,
We have split valuation along with Material ledger and Actual costing active.
My client wants to keep price determination 3 / V for Header Material as it defaults 3 / S while creating subbordinate materials i.e., by valuation types.
Per SAP, the requirement is Price determination 2 and Price control is V for Header Material.
My client questions, what is wrong in keeping 3 in Header level?
Do you have any input for this? as I have only answer, as it's the standard configuration and impact unknown.
Ashok

Hi Ashok ,
The materials with split valuation are there in the MM valuation tables MBEW, EBEW, QBEW with the field 'valuation type' BWTAR filled . The header segment (with field valuation type blank) is only for intermal use of the system .
For such materials with valuation type blank (the header segment of material with split valuation) in Material Ledger only the table CKMLPR contains information, the rest of the tables are empty .
The header segment has always price control V. However, the price of the header segment is NOT a moving average price. It is the weighted average price of all valuation types.
Therefore with a Split valuation scenario the materials are recorded in the system with the field BWTAR not blank and with its own price control independently of the header segment
Hence , i think its immaterial of what ever Price Determination you put in Material Master for header material and hence SAP has recommended "2" for the same . Having Price Determination "3" will not have any impact.. i believe...
Regards
Sarada
Edited by: Sarada Sankar Sil on Nov 16, 2010 9:48 AM

Scenario regarding Split Valuation

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for