Self Certified Vendor

Hi All,
One Quick Question :
I need to declare some vendor's QM Process as Self certified for which the Inspection Lot should not be created despite of Active Insp Type 01.
I have a declare the Actaul QM system as "certified" in OQB7 and in Q Info Record for that Material & Vendor Combination assigned this as the Existing QM System.
Is there something else that needs to be taken care. I am missing something as Inspection Lot is still getting created while I do the GR for the Purchase Order.
Any pointers will be helpful.
Thanks,
RKM.

Thanks Shymal for your prompt reply...
I realised there is another drop down at the same location as you suggessted saying "Inspection Active if vendor not certified".It works as per my requirement.
I had earlier by mistake made selection as "Inspection Active independent of vendor certification"; therefore it was creating Inspection Lot.
Thanks for your help
Keep it up !!!
RKM.

Similar Messages

  • Requirement: Insp lot of self Certified material should not get skipped

    Hi Gurus following is req  pls suggest me
    Requirement: Insp lot of self Certified material should not get skipped
    if there is a change in Material Revision. As of now Auto Usage Decision
    takes place on Self certified material Lots. This happens even after
    there is a material revision. This is undesirable as QC is Not able to
    ensure the implementation of design changes.
    Apps

    i have understood the following from ur reply
    new revision created by design- purchaser creates po- materials comes in quality - auto skip
    quality don't come into picture in ur scenario
    solution :
    new revision created by design - while creating po they will get error q info record for new revision not present- intimation to quality for creating q info record - decide whether to insp or skip it - normal process
    use of q info record
    in material master maintain control key for q info record.
    create q info record for material, rev, plant , vendor
    keep rest evertthing as it is - as a normal procedure material will be skipped
    when any new rev is created - while creating po they will get error q info record for new revision not present- QC will get intimation regarding this new rev. -after all approval u can create q info record for this new rev. and then only purchaser will be allowed to create po.
    make necesary chages in plan after every new revision

  • SAP Certified Vendor V's SAP Certified processes

    Hello Gurus
    We are currently looking at some vendors for a voicepicking project at the moment. Some of them are SAP certified while others have been audited by SAP and their processes have been approved. Can you please provide SAP’s definition of a ‘SAP Certified Vendor’ and a vendor that has been audited and their processes approved by SAP. Possibly you can consider the following in your response?
    Product compatibility and interface compatibility.
    Future upgrade compatibility.
    Implications on SAP support.
    Any other items that should be considered.
    The vendor is quoted as saying:
    "We are not SAP certified. We use SAP certified methods for connection to SAP
    Information on items such as the JCO, .XML can be obtained from the SAP website.
    Thus we use SAP certified methods of connection..."
    Hope you can help!
    KR,
    C

    Ashish
    Yes you will get your hard copy of certificate in 4-6 weeks time.
    Once you get that, you can send to SAP Education or Kenneth from this forum - Your certification Number and other relevant details shared on many threads here.
    Your S-userid is one of its kind and is given to every certified consultant.
    For the logo again, you will need your s-userid.
    Please mail it to Kenneth and he will mail you back the relevant logo.
    All the best!
    Rgds,
    Zub
    reference - Clarification regarding certificates and logos from SAP certification exams

  • Source inspection - inspection lot skip for certified vendor

    Hii,
    I have a requirement in which during source inspection, the inspection lot should not be created if the Vendor is certifed. I have made the following settings:-
    1. In Vendor Master, maintained the Actual QM system in control-reference data.(QM system marked for skip in customizing)
    2. In Material Master-
        - Activated QM Proc- QM control Key -Delivery release
        - Target QM system
        - Inspection type for source inspection activated in inspection set up
    3.In Quality Info Record for Vendor,Material,Plant combination-in Inspection Control tab-
        - Maintained the existing QM system & validity
        - Selected 'No Inspection' in Insp. control
        In Vendor source inspection tab maintained the inspection type & lead time.
    Inspite of the above settings, I can see this PO (for vendor,material,plant) in the source inspection worklist(QI07).
    Please suggest as to which setting I might be missing.
    Thanks!!!
    Regards,
    SV

    Hi,,
    You have to go T code QI07
    where give input Vendor ,Material plant,
    Delivery dateopening peroid
    Then execute the transaction .
    Select line item click oninsp lot & save.
    Where you have trigger lot for the same then only lot will get genarated.
    Regards
    SANIL
    This confugaration required if you have option if lots get rejected.
    Quality management-QM logistics-QM procurement -Control key
    Define control key;
    GR/Source inspection control;
    GR for rejection; three option is available
    1.source inspection has no effect on goods receipt
    2.Creation of new inspection  lot
    3.Goods receipt not allowed
    Regards
    SANIL
    Edited by: Sanil Vadke on Mar 12, 2010 7:29 AM

  • Create self certified SSL

    Hello. I generated a self signed certificate that has this error when used:
    error:0B080074:x509 certificate routines:X509check_privatekey:key values mismatch
    I'm following the above linked Apple Developer page as follows:
    //log in as root
    sudo zsh
    //issue the command to simultaneously create a key and a CSR:
    /System/Library/OpenSSL/misc/CA.pl -newreq
    In my home directory I now have 2 files:
    newkey.pem
    newreq.pem
    I want to self-sign the certificate so continuing with The Apple Developer page:
    //we issue the following command:
    /System/Library/OpenSSL/misc/CA.pl -newca
    I now have in my home directory
    demoCA (folder)
    newkey.pem (file)
    newreq.pem (file)
    //I sign the certificate:
    /System/Library/OpenSSL/misc/CA.pl -signreq
    In my home directory I now have the file which when used causes the private key mismatch errors:
    newcert.pem
    I think i'm probably duplicating 2 keys with the -newreq and -newca commands but if I don't do -newreq I don't have a newkey.pem file to sign. Is anyone able to help explain where I've not understood the process? Thank you

    Hi Patrick,
    In addition, here are more articles below for your reference:
    Step-By-Step: Setting up AD FS and Enabling Single Sign-On to Office 365
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/canitpro/archive/2013/06/13/step-by-step-setting-up-ad-fs-and-enabling-single-sign-on-to-office-365.aspx
    Office 365 and ADFS…Active Directory Federation Service Installation
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/9082.office-365-and-adfs-active-directory-federation-service-installation.aspx
    Certificate Requirements for Federation Servers
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd807040.aspx
    Best Regards,
    Amy
    Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and un-mark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact [email protected]

  • Qm Automatic Inspection lot clearance

    Dear All,
    My client have one requirement.
    For the self certified vendors they want to go for automatic lot clearance.
    that is lot should be created and wait in quality inspection for some
    defined time and the should be cleared automatically without any manual
    intervention. 
    If this is possible with DMR.
    kindly shown me the possibility with screenshots.
    Thanking you,
    S.Thanigai

    Hi selvam s ,
                       As per my understanding for such materials in the material master QM -view in the inspection setup...........for the inspection type -01 (Goods receipt insp. for purchase order) <b>uncheck</b> the check box post to inspection stock ......then the inspection lot will not be created on GR & the stock will be moved to unrestricted use directly......
    Please let me know if you have any further query regarding this........
    Please <u>reward points</u> if the ans is helpful..............
    Thanks
    Kaushik

  • SAP Certified V's SAP Approved Vendors

    Hello Gurus
    We are currently looking at some vendors for a project at the moment.  Some of them are SAP certified while others have been audited by SAP and their processes have been approved.  Can you please provide SAP’s definition of a ‘SAP Certified Vendor’ and a vendor that has been audited and their processes approved by SAP.  Possibly you can consider the following in your response?
    Product compatibility and interface compatibility.
    Future upgrade compatibility.
    Implications on SAP support.
    Any other items that should be considered.
    The vendor is quoted as saying:
    "We are not SAP certified.  We use SAP certified methods for connection to SAP
    Information on items such as the JCO, .XML can be obtained from the SAP website.
    Thus we use SAP certified methods of connection..."
    Hope you can help!
    KR,
    C

    Hi Madhan,
    Sap JCO is mainly used to connect the Java based applications do chk the below links it gives u a clear picture.
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/64/52d651ac492749b7152609b001c81d/frameset.htm
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/e8/bda7c0cef411d6b2bd00508b5d5211/frameset.htm
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/01/43e13d82fcfb34e10000000a114084/frameset.htm
    Regards
    Sampath

  • Creation of Vendor Registration Questionnaire

    Hi SRM Gurus,
    We need to Customize the questionnaire. We are able to Create the Questionnaire with some simple options like Question group, Question. However, We are unable to control the alignment.
    Can anyone send some documents for How to Create a Questionnaire?
    For your information, I referred the following, http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/ad/65decfcdc544799a92a9cea8e21b5c/frameset.htm
    please send other documents.
    Thanks in advance,
    Ramkumar

    Hi
    <b>Please go through this -></b>
    <u>
    Supplier Registration Questionnaire
    error send questionnaire in srm Ros
    Supplier Registration Table
    Re: ERROR during supplier self registration
    Vendor Evaluation questionnaire problem
    Re: Modify text mail sended supplier in ROS
    Re: Questionnaries in supplier registration
    ROS Questionnaire Recipient Email in So50
    Including validation in questionnaire
    Supplier Registration
    Re: Supplier Questionnaire Preview
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/43/9e81410d23c37de10000000a155106/frameset.htm
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/b2/a298403de08368e10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/be/09283486c9ac42a20156c345f2a3fc/frameset.htm
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/70/d394418ecead5fe10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005vp/helpdata/en/60/7386c8ad664924bc81ffc7e24083a6/frameset.htm
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/77/a498403de08368e10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/6d/0f343e47fd6b2ee10000000a114084/frameset.htm
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005vp/helpdata/en/de/2fd938c6fba936e10000000a114084/frameset.htm
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/cf/35074152aff323e10000000a155106/frameset.htm
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005vp/helpdata/en/6c/477b38ff08c939e10000009b38f842/frameset.htm</u>
    <b>Some useful SAP OSS Notes to refer -></b>
    <u>Note 996810 ROS Prescreen error message correction
    Note 827172 ROS: Questionnaire language
    907258 ROS: Answered questionnaires are not displayed
    889963 ROS: Questionnaires are not updated
    867551 SRM VE: Questions/Questionnaires not in grouping
    836781 ROS: Questionnaire language dependency => hidden links
    836929 Consulting Solution: Survey Cockpit for Vendor Evaluation
    829081 ROS: Repair report for additional language information
    799937 ROS: General questionnaires after registration fails
    797746 Display of category text in VE questionnaires
    798654 ROS: No update of new completed questionnaire for CCMS
    799302 ROS: Update deletes product category assignment and quest.
    795335 ROS: Product categories or questionnaires are not sent
    791624 Reading of product categories
    783774 ROS: Several questionnaires for one product category
    781906 ROS: Incorrect name of questionnaires in detail view
    776530 ROS: Anewed sending of questionnaire incorrect
    768059 Vendor evaluation: Evaluations from BW not extracted
    766707 Vendor evaluation: Too many questionnaires to be filled in
    764451 Questionnaire determin.: F4 displays too many questionnaires
    167128 Only 15 entries are displayed in questionnaire pulldown</u>
    Hope this will help.
    Regards
    - Atul

  • Vendor rating system?

    Dear Gurus,
    how do we plan for a vendor rating system and move about?
    Thanks..

    Hi
    There are several point , firstly whether the vendor is ISO
    certified or TS certified , vendor assessment , rejection
    trend analysis in a month, debit trend analysis in a
    month,On time delivery analysis , dependence on local
    transport, Documentations maintained, Yearly discounts on
    bulk quantity orders etc.
    A chart is prepared for all these activities in horizontals
    and in verticals the vendors names are written and then the
    rating is done on a 6 point scale or 1 point scale.
    Regards
    Anjali

  • Posting block for self billed invoices

    Hi ,
    My requirement is once a self billed invoice is generated , it should not be readily available for payment. It should be first treated as blocked for payment. There should be a manual check which when unticked would make the invoice ready to be paid by accounts payable. Can this be done for only few selected self billed  vendors.
    Thanks in advance ,
    Vinayak

    HI VV
    You can block the invoice manualy
    Go to Payment tab in MIRO
    enter the invoice and then on payment tab of the invoice u have the payment block over there
    u can select the option over there and block it
    Cheers
    Chris

  • No permission to write files from applets

    Dear All,
    I wrote one applet for displaying a live video and able to capture a single frame and cine loops. It's working properly.
    Now i plug in this applet into my .jsp page. After this I'm facing so many problems.Initially i can't able to store anything
    from my applet (after plug in to .jsp). So i edit the java.policy file. Now i can store the single frames captured via my applet. But I'm not able to store the cine loops.
    _Following is my java.policy file contents,_
    grant codeBase "file:${{java.ext.dirs}}/*" {
         permission java.security.AllPermission;
    grant {
         permission java.lang.RuntimePermission "stopThread";     
         permission java.net.SocketPermission "localhost:1024-", "listen";
         permission java.util.PropertyPermission "java.version", "read";
         permission java.util.PropertyPermission "java.vendor", "read";
         permission java.util.PropertyPermission "java.vendor.url", "read";
         permission java.util.PropertyPermission "java.class.version", "read";
         permission java.util.PropertyPermission "os.name", "read";
         permission java.util.PropertyPermission "os.version", "read";
         permission java.util.PropertyPermission "os.arch", "read";
         permission java.util.PropertyPermission "file.separator", "read";
         permission java.util.PropertyPermission "path.separator", "read";
         permission java.util.PropertyPermission "line.separator", "read";
         permission java.util.PropertyPermission "java.specification.version", "read";
         permission java.util.PropertyPermission "java.specification.vendor", "read";
         permission java.util.PropertyPermission "java.specification.name", "read";
         permission java.util.PropertyPermission "java.vm.specification.version", "read";
         permission java.util.PropertyPermission "java.vm.specification.vendor", "read";
         permission java.util.PropertyPermission "java.vm.specification.name", "read";
         permission java.util.PropertyPermission "java.vm.version", "read";
         permission java.util.PropertyPermission "java.vm.vendor", "read";
         permission java.util.PropertyPermission "java.vm.name", "read";
         permission java.lang.RuntimePermission "accessClassInPackage.sun.jdbc.odbc";
         permission java.util.PropertyPermission "file.encoding", "read";
              <security>
         <all-permissions/>
         </security>
    grant codeBase "file:/D:/Raja/Java/MyProject/AppletEx/build/web/WEB-INF/classes/-" {
    permission java.io.FilePermission "<<ALL FILES>>", "read";
    permission java.io.FilePermission "<<ALL FILES>>", "write";
    I can also sing my applet (self certified). But the problem is not solved.
    In my log file i found the following is preventing to write the files.
    com.sun.media.JMFSecurityManager.checkFileSave(JMFSecurityManager.java:250)
    Can anyone help me to solve this issue..
    Regards
    ChennaiBee.

    To access files (read and write) from an applet, the applet needs to be signed.
    There is a forum here to discuss signed applets:
    http://forum.java.sun.com/forum.jspa?forumID=63
    These instructions (in Part III) for signing applets work:
    http://java.sun.com/javase/6/docs/technotes/guides/plugin/developer_guide/contents.html

  • HR-OCI 6.0 Announcement

    Dear certified vendors, SAP Partner - Software - with Certified Integration, and/or Independent Software Vendor with Certified Integration for HR-OCI 4.6,
    Dear intertested vendors in organizational charting integration with SAP,
    Today, we would like to inform you that as of end of September 2006 a new version of the HR-OCI interface will be available for mySAP ERP 2005 and onwards.
    The new interface HR-OCI 6.0 - as its previous version - allows a third-party vendor’s application to extract SAP Organizational Management objects, relationships and attribute data from SAP Organizational Management and SAP Personnel Administration. Extracted data are displayed in a graphic presentation. Mainly, as the interface is a Web-enabled interface, the graphical display is for the SAP Enterprise Portal and specifically for SAP Enterprise Portal roles (e. g. SAP Manager Self-Service).
    The interface utilizes the functionality provided by the Object and Data Provider (OADP) and SAP Query to extract the desired data from SAP Organizational Management and SAP Personnel Administration.
    The technical reason why SAP offers a new interface version is that the Object and Data Provider (OADP) functionality changed as of release mySAP ERP 2005. Hence, a new parameter that was introduced by the new OADP functionality needs to be reflected in the interface. This new parameter is coming along with the organizational structure views invented in mySAP ERP 2005.
    Besides the technical reason for a new version of the SAP HR Interface for Organizational Charting the new interface version includes the following additional features:
    Context-sensitive launch of organizational charting applications
    This means that from an OADP based table (like the Organizational Unit Viewer iView in the Business Package for SAP Manager Self-Service (mySAP ERP) 1.0 a user can launch the organizational chart for a subordinated organizational unit. The third-party’s organizational chart application can show up a subordinated organizational unit as the focused object (i.e. object on top of the screen that displays the chart) although the root object is some levels up. To support this functionality, a new organizational structure is delivered to act as example for your implementation.
    Usage of the integration scenarios in other solutions that use the Object and Data Provider (OADP) functionality as of mySAP ERP 2005 release (according to license conditions).
    This provides the possibility to give other users than managers access to organizational chart utilizing third-party products and thereby use graphical org charts in other business scenarios.
    Central SAP Notes are:
    931794 (SAP HR Interface for organiaztional Charting (HR-OCI) 6.0)
    746426 (MSS: Organizational Charting Interface HR-OCI 4.6)
    846057 (HR-OCI - Certified Providers)
    For the new interface HR-OCI 6.0 we offer third-party vendors the possibility to get certified. The certification is valid for the integration scenarios from mySAP ERP 2005 onwards. Certification for the previous version of HR-OCI, namely HR-OCI 4.6, are for releases 4.6C to mySAP ERP 2004 and certainly are valid.
    If you are interested in more details or certification, do not hesitate to contact the Integration and Certification Center (ICC) via SAP Service Marketplace (http://www.sap.com/partners/ICC) using the online service request form.

    Can you please advise if customers who have older versions of SAP (with R/3 Web Plug-in, or versions with integrated HR-OCI) and who have upgraded to SAPGUI Build 640 are affected by this issue We are seeing the following error when trying to pull back the default views OCIMIN and OCIOFO from SAP.
    XML data is empty
    However logging in to SAP and using the remote function module HCM_GET_ORGSTRUCTURE_AS_XML or HCM_GET_ORGSTRUCTURE_AS_XML_IN we get XML returned OK. Can somebody please respond?

  • UK Payroll - Local Government Teacher's Absence Scheme

    Hi Gurus,
    I am facing an issue with configuration of Local Government Teacher's Absence Scheme ( UK).
    Please let me know if anybody has worked on this.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Anupama

    Hi Surya,
    The issue is that we are facing is that  the Local Government Teacher's Absence Scheme that is configured  is  currently not taking into account the previous service while calculating occupational sick pay (OSP).
    Actually when an employee joins a new organization having previous local gov. experience, the previous service start date is maintained in IT0041 and according to statutory requirements the total absence entitlemet ( Self certified & doctor certified sickness etc)  should take the previous service date into account while calculating the length of service and on the basis of the length of service the entitlement should be calculated.
    Currently the system is not taking into account the previous service date for length of service calculatioatn for the first four months of service with the new organization, only after four months the previous service is being considered.
    The return value of feature GlOSS ( for calculating seniority ) is EBED3 ( D3 is the date type on IT0041).
    I have checked the config part, everything seems to be fine, request you to please help me with this.
    Thanks in advance,
    Anupama

  • Outlook Anywhere, Office 2013 + Exchange 2013 freezes

    Hi.
    I'm pulling my hair out with this problem as it seems to make no sense.
    I have a client using outlook 2013 through outlook anywhere to their new server running Exchange 2013. when outlook is opened it seems to work for about 10 mins or so then after that if you go to send an email it freezes and says it trying to contact the
    server. you wait for 10 mins then it works again for a while.
    I've changed the timeout settings on the server and everything, they are currently experiencing this in their Spanish office which connects back to the UK.
    No if they dial up the vpn ( no settings changed at all) and run outlook, it all works perfectly..... No one in the UK office (about 10 users) have any issues its only the 2 people in Spain, and one of them uses the laptop in the UK office that they have
    in Spain with no issues.
    I have a CA certificate from slls so not using a self certified one. however its not a wildcard so I haven't set-up on the external domain dns and instead just manually enter the settings (which works fine)
    Its almost as if after 10 mins some connection drops but then takes ages to reconnect again.
    There are a lot of schannel errors appearing on the machines which suggests they are looking at the wrong ports for connection on a couple of attempts, but the questions is why? and whether this has anything to do with the OA problem.
    If anyone has some fresh ideas or any thoughts i would be very grateful as this is driving me round the bend, and i have 2 other clients who have a very similar set-up but have no issues.
    Router Spanish side is a Comcast router and UK side is a draytek 2820
    Exchange is running on Server 2012 with both the CA and Mailbox roles on the same server.
    heeeellp before I go bald :)

    Hi,
    Please have the users in Spain open Outlook, go to FILE
    -> Account Settings -> Account Settings -> Double click the account name ->
    More Settings -> Connection tab -> Select
    Connect to Microsoft Exchange using HTTP, and click Exchange Proxy Settings, tick
    On slow networks, connect using HTTP first, then connect using TCP/IP
    -> OK.
    We can also have the users in Spain test the connectivity to Exchange via Remote Connectivity Analyzer to find if there's any error.
    https://testconnectivity.microsoft.com/
    Regards,
    Melon Chen
    TechNet Community Support

  • Certificates and Mail - has anyone got them to work recently?

    Hi,
    I've been using Thawte digital certificates with Mail for almost three years and had no problems. Recently one of my certificates was due to expire, so I revoked it and got another one issued. The certificate is installed in my Keychain and everything looks to be correct - Keychain places a small green tick next to it and says 'This certificate is valid' and it is also ticked in the Address Book.
    However, the option to sign and encrypt messages in Mail's compose window has vanished. I can't find a way of getting it to appear so it looks like Mail can't find the certificate.
    I've quit Mail and reimported the certificate, no change. I've tried a self-certified certificate to see if that works - nothing.
    A look on the forums suggests that a number of other people have had similar problems.
    So has anyone found a workaround? This is quite important as I rely on signed email messages when working on large documents.
    Thanks,
    Mike.
    iMac G5 1.5Gb RAM 250 Gb HD   Mac OS X (10.4.6)  

    This is from Mail Help, that perhaps you have not seen:
    "Signing and encrypting email messages
    If you have a personal certificate on your computer, you can send signed messages (including the body of the message and any attachments) to anyone using Mail. Signed messages let your recipients verify your identity as the sender, and provide assurance that the message has not been tampered with in transit. A Signed icon (a checkmark) in the email header indicates your personal certificate is installed in Keychain Access.
    Encrypted messages (which encrypt both the body of the message and any attachments) offer a higher level of security than just signed messages. You can only send encrypted messages when you have certificates stored on your computer for both you and all recipients of your message. The easiest way to get someone's certificate is to have them send you a signed email message. When you view a signed message, Mail automatically imports the person's certificate (or "public key") and stores it in your keychain. You'll know you have the recipient's personal certificate installed in Keychain Access if an Encrypt (closed lock) icon appears next to the Signed icon after you address a new mail message to that person.
    To SIGN and ENCRYPT an email message:
    Choose File > New Message. In the Account pop-up menu, choose the account for which you have a personal certificate installed in your keychain. A Signed (checkmark) icon on the upper-right side above the message text indicates the message will be signed when you send it. To send the message unsigned, click the Signed icon to deselect it. An unsigned ("x") icon replaces the checkmark.
    Address the email. An Encrypt (closed lock) icon appears next to the Signed icon if you have a personal certificate for the recipient in your keychain and indicates the message will be encrypted when you send it. To send the message unencrypted, click the Encrypt icon to deselect it. An open lock icon replaces the closed lock icon.
    For security, encrypted messages are saved in your Sent mailbox in an encrypted format.
    If you don't have a certificate for all the recipients, a dialog appears that allows you to either cancel the delivery of the message or send the message unencrypted.
    If your recipients are using Mail, security headers marked Signed and Encrypted are visible in the messages they receive. If they are using an application that doesn't use signed and encrypted messages, the certificate might be in the form of an attachment. If your recipients save the attachment as a file, they can add your certificate to their keychain.
    Since many mailing lists reject signed messages (because the signature is an attachment), deselect the Signed icon before sending a message to a mailing list.
    See also
    encryption
    security
    digital signature
    Open this for me
    Apple Service & Support article: How to Use a Secure Email Signing Certificate (Digital ID)"
    Hope this answers your problem.
    iMac 1.9 GHz PowerPC G5 1.5 GB DDR2 SDRAM   Mac OS X (10.4.6)   Slot Loading 8X Dual Layer SuperDrive, iSight & Apple Remote; iPod Video

Maybe you are looking for