Vendor rating system?

Dear Gurus,
how do we plan for a vendor rating system and move about?
Thanks..

Hi
There are several point , firstly whether the vendor is ISO
certified or TS certified , vendor assessment , rejection
trend analysis in a month, debit trend analysis in a
month,On time delivery analysis , dependence on local
transport, Documentations maintained, Yearly discounts on
bulk quantity orders etc.
A chart is prepared for all these activities in horizontals
and in verticals the vendors names are written and then the
rating is done on a 6 point scale or 1 point scale.
Regards
Anjali

Similar Messages

  • Rating System Change

    Due to the request of many of our community users, (see this thread) I have taken an intermediate step towards solving our ratings problem
    in the community.   Now, only relatively established users with 50 or
    more posts will be able to rate messages.   In my experience, the vast
    majority of 1 star ratings come from users new to the community.  We do not intend for any message rating to be negative, however, due to the nature of the 1 to 5 star system, anything less than 5 stars can be interpreted as an insult.
    I realize this does not fix the problem.  There are currently no other
    feasible options available for the rating system.  I do know that at
    some point in the future, our forum vendor will release new rating
    system options to us.  At that point, I will start a discussion about
    which of the options is best for our community.  Unfortunately, I do
    not have an idea of their timeline currently.  I hope to be able to
    give an update on when we might expect new options soon. 
    Regards,
    Laura
    Web Support and Operations
    National Instruments
    Message Edited by Laura F. on 09-14-2007 05:01 PM

    Let the proclaimation ring throughout the land!
    This sounds like a wonderful solution and seems to be yet another way that NI listens to the community.
    Matt Holt
    Certified LabVIEW Architect

  • Vendor rating report

    Hello all,
    Vendor rating report with respect to PO Delivery date Vs. actual delivery date required.
    The actual delevery date incase of domestic PO is the GoddsReciep Number date, and incase of importPO, this is the invoice date of the vendor.
    thanks &regards,
    Obulesu

    Hi,
    T code MC$6 will be useful for you.
    There you can get the delivery date variance in days.
    Regards
    KK

  • How do I use the rating system for multiple raters?

    My wife, her sister, and I are all rating some photos I took a couple of days ago. Each of us, of course, has different favorites.
    I would like to record our different ratings in the LR3 rating system but can't see an immediately obvious way to do so. I thought of using the color labels--different color for each of us. But each photo will only take one color label. I could use the star ratings, one star for only one selection, two for two, etc. But that would not record who chose which. I need to know that.
    Has anyone had the same problem? If so, is there some rather obvious solution? I would think that it's not all that unusual for several folk to participate in a shoot, using one camera; and then to need some way to record their differing judgments on the photos in LR3.
    Any thoughts would be helpful. Thanks in advance,
    John Kendrick

    The rating system in LR3 is not really designed with that type of functionality in mind.  The "target Lightroom user" is an individual that uses LR to create a catalog of photographs which can be graded with a star rating based upon their opinion of the photograph.  The concept of seperate star ratings for multiple users doesn't really fit into that concept.  LR3, in general, is designed with a single photographer in mind... one that essentially uses the program by his/herself... so it has a bare minimum of 'group' functionality.
    It may be possible to find a plug-in that will enable star ratings by multiple users, but I've never heard of one before.
    If you really, really need this type of functionality (i.e. saving star ratings by multiple people), the only way to do it that I could think of would be to create multiple collections of the same shoot, each of which is filled with virtual copies of the original photos.  Each collection could hypothetically be called '08-03-2010 Bill Ratings'...'08-03-2010 Jill Ratings'... etc... etc.  Admittedly, such a workaround may very well be more trouble than its worth... that's just the only way I can think of that you might come close to achieving the functionality you're after.
    ***EDIT:  You beat me to it (VC idea) while I was typing this reply, Ian... wasn't trying to post redundant info...

  • Difference between Existing QM system and Vendor QM system in QI info recor

    In Quality info record, under inspection control tab, I find 2 options for certificate monitoring, one is Existing QM system and another one is Vendor's QM system, Please advice the difference between them.

    hi dear,
    There is no such difference, only he thing is when u developed or upload some new vendor based OM system which is valid from its industry type. Like in manufacuring it is strongly recomended that vendor is certified by some authorized agency like ISO, TUV Nord etc. so when u use this and configure it in ur sap system than u may change the setting and use Vendor QM system in Q-Info, while if is not there than u may use existing QM system of ur own company if u uploaded in SAP or u may keep it blank if not required.
    if we use Vendor QM system than it is best practice to maintain QM procurement and related document like Certificate or Delievery assurance from vendor in MM02 ---> QM view.
    I hope this short one cleares ur point.
    regards
    Shailendra Gaur
    SAP-QM

  • Vendor Rating

    Dear All.
                     Please any one tell me standard vendor rating report available in sap or not..
    if yes please tell me the T-code for that and procedure
    REgards
    Kumar

    Please check these reports if any of these staisfy you requirement
    ME65 - Ranking Lists
    ME6B - Evaluations per Material/Material Group
    ME6C - Vendors Without Evaluation
    ME6D - Vendors Not Evaluated Since
    ME6H - Standard Analysis

  • Regarding Vendor Rating.

    Pls any one can help me how to capture Vendor Rating for Quality.
    I have the requirement for accepted with Deviation.
    if accepted it is considered as 100 score
    if rejected it is consideredsas 1 score
    but it the Lot size is some thing more Then One.
    Here, let us assume that Lot size is 10 no's
    out of which i accepted 4 No's
    and rejected                 3 No's
    and accpeted with Deviation is 2.
    and 1 No's is in Hold.
    what should be the score and UD code.
    i mean to say is i want to Decide the Q Score according to the Vendor and Quatity posted .
    pls help me
    thanks in advance.
    Kumar.

    Hi
    A quality score can be derived from the:
    Usage decision
    Share of defects in the lot
    Share of defects for the characteristics
    Quality score for the characteristics
    You can use share of defects in the lot procedure .AssignQ score procedure " quality score from share of scrap" in material master
    This procedure calculates the quality score using the share of scrap in the inspection lot:
                           I_KQD_MAX         Share of scrap
    E_KQD = I_KQD_MAX * (--) ** (-(--
    - 1) ** 2)
                         Limiting val.       Predef. share
    with I_KQD_MAX               Maximum QSc from vendor evaluation
         Limiting value          Lower limit for good quality in QM
         Share of scrap          Estimated share of scrap in inspection lot
         Predef. share           Predefined share of scrap from QM
                                   inspection data
    If it does not meet your requirement, create your own function module ,create new Q score procedure in spro and assin new function module to this procedure.
    Sanjay

  • Is the rating system really necessary?

    I know... I know... I'm probably getting on a touchy subject here.
    I understand the desire for a sort of incentive for people to answer questions but it is my observation that use of points is hardly consistent. For the most part, it seems like questions from established users tend to get helpful and solved answers most of the time. Great. The point system works in that instance.
    I have also noticed that I will see someone come on the boards, post a question, get their answer and never post again. They either don't know about the rating system or they do not stay long enough to use it.
    Does that mean I need to look at the O.P.'s post count before I post an answer? I think that's shallow. If someone has question and I think I know a solution, then I will post a solution.
    But what is the solution? Do away with the rating system? I think some upper-level members would have a justifiable objection to that. Change it to a raw post count? I suspect we would see an even higher number of posts deleted because of people trying to pad their numbers.
    What if members received 1 point for marking an answer as helpful and 2 points for marking an answer as solved?
    Its a thought.

    No, the rating (reputation) system isn't really necessary, but it does serve as an incentive for many people to increase their participation, and increased participation lends itself to the perception of increased value in this Apple-provided service, if not to the usefulness of the bulk of the posts that are left here.
    Ultimately, there are a lot of things that go into the decision to attach a reputation system of one kind or another to Discussions, and there has been one such system or another in place here for many years, so there is no reason to believe that the concept will ever be abandoned.
    As to the idea that upper-level members would object to its loss, yes, some would. Maybe many. On the other hand, there are quite a few of us who see through this charade and do what we can do undermine its importance relative to the real mission of Apple's Discussions. In the end, I'd like to think that our cynicism helps to balance out the "shallowness" of post-count building and points-grubbing strategies that seem to obsess many of our peers.
    What if members received 1 point for marking an answer as helpful and 2 points for marking an answer as solved?
    I've suggested this myself in the past, but one of the roadblocks to its implementation is that the current software is only able to mete out points in increments of 5. Oh well....
    Good luck!

  • Vendor rating By mails

    Hi All,
    My clients wants to send all the vendor rating by mails instead of sending it thorugh post or couriers.
    Please let me know how to activate this.
    Can we need to use any abaper for this.
    Regards,
    Nagaraj S

    Hi Manish,
    How can we do this , can you exolain me some scenarios.
    Regards,
    Nagaraj S

  • Vendor rating and insurance indicator table

    Hi all,
        In which table the fields vendor rating and insurance indicator zz_moc_rating & zz_insurance shown in EKKO stored?

    Hi Sathya,
    These are custom fields not created by SAP but by someone in your project.
    Just in EKKO if you have some Check Tables against these fields. If yes then these fields are getting populated from there. Else from some screen or program wherein user is entering some input.
    Regards,
    Chetan.
    PS: Reward points if this helps.

  • CAN WE MAINTAIN VENDOR RATING IN Q.M

    Hi GURUS,
    Is it possible to maintain vendor rating in Q.M.
    We have 5 Quality parameters for rating each vendor for particular material,with these parameters my client wants to rate the vendors.
    Regards
    Ram

    Hi Shyamal,
    Our scenario is like this,we have five materials for which we have 5 M.I.cs like Fe,Moisture,Fines,Carbon and Sulpur. for these M.I.Cs we have weightage as 50,20,10,10,10 respectively.
    Foe Example M.I.C Fe the weightage is as follows.
    Fe             weightage
    >= 87           =   50
    86 to 86.9     =   45
    85 to 85.9     =   40
    < 84             =   25
    the above procedure is followed for the other M.I.Cs and based on the weightage all five M.I.Cs a vendor rating is decided as follows
    GOOD                =90 AND ABOVE
    SATISFACTORY = 75 TO 89
    POOR                = BELOW 75
    How can we map this map this scenario,
    Regards
    Ram
    Edited by: RAMKUMAR WARIYAR on Nov 5, 2008 3:17 PM

  • Reg. Vendor evaluation,Vendor rating

    Dear All
    How to Vendor evaluation maintain,Vendor rating by turn over/Reliability/Quality.
    Thanks
    S.K.Rajakumar

    Check this Link
    http://www.sap-img.com/mm009.htm

  • Vendor Rating Procedure

    Dear All
    Vendor rating full scenario
    Regards
    k.s.krishnamurthy

    Hi
    Path: 1. SPRO>MM>Purchasing-->Vendor Evaluation-
    2. SPRO>MM>Purchasing>Vendor Evaluation> Define Criteria Price,quality,Delivery,Service For each criteria you will have Sub criteria Criteria Sub-Criteria 
    3.SPROMM>Purchasing>Vendor Evaluation-->Define Scope List.
    4. SPROMM>Purchasing>Vendor Evaluation--> Maintain Purchasing Organization Data 
    5. ME61 With above, you need to explore yourself and read SAP help files .For more check the link
    Raju

  • Vendor rating - Demerit factor

    Hi Friends,
    In vendor rating, 3 evaluation criterian are followed namely, quality(Q), delivery (D) & service (S).
    Now the vendor rating becomes, VRx = (QDS) .
    In this above rating, our client wants to multiply by using demerit factor.
    a.     Demerit-factor-1 (Rejections in shop) on Quality , Delivery and Service.
    b.     Demerit-factor-2 (Rejections in  site) on Quality , Delivery and Service
    Then vendor rating becomes,
    VRx = (QDS) * Demerit factor.
    How can I address this.
    Munna.

    Hi,
    Demerit factor is nothing but multiplication factor which vendor decides based on the rejection of goods supplied by the vendor ( after acceptance by quality, it is rejected at shop floor).
    If there is no rejection then Demerit facto is 1.  So vendor gets full rating.  If the demerit factor is 0.9, he will get 90% of the vendor rating.
    I hope it clarifies the requirement.  Kindly let me know if you still you could not able to get it.
    Munna

  • Rating system odd problem

    Hi,
    I've created a enterprise wiki and the page rating does not display correctly. Instead of displaying stars as a graphic it shows text saying
    'click to apply your rating as 1 star, click to apply your rating as 2 stars...etc"
    The rating system works and displays on things like blog posts etc.
    Any help is appreciated!

    The Solution is with the X_UA-Compatible. You can adding the tag in the masterpage:
    <meta http-equiv="X-UA-Compatible" content="IE=9" />
    Not optimal but this is the solution, see on
    http://blog.lekman.com/2013/01/ie10-fails-to-render-ratings-in.html

Maybe you are looking for