Service material deletion indicator

Hi Freinds,
there is a SES to delete. when i select the perticular SES and select delete, the system says that the service material is no longer use. but it has not been deleted. pls help me to solve this issue.
Sujith

Hi Sujith ,
Goto AC03 , enter ur activity number.
Then Click on Purchasing Data and check the status.
Remove block indicator if any and try once again.
Regards
Ramesh Ch

Similar Messages

  • Material Deletion Indicator - Urgent

    Hi All,
    By mistake i have deleted a component in a work order & saved it. I would like to like to is it possible to undo this deletion?
    I know i can add back this component to the work order, but i want to undo the deletion.
    Await inputs.
    Vivek

    Hi,
    It is not possible to perform UNDO for deletion after you save.
    Regards,
    Krishna Mohan

  • How to set deletion indicator to SERVICE ENTRY SHEET

    Dear Experts,
    Please explain, is it mandatory to set Deletion indicator to Service entry sheet before Start of Archiving Service  entry sheet.
    Also explain Procedural steps to set deletion indicator to service entry sheet.
    Thanks in Advance

    Dear,
    First of all Revoke Acceptacne as
    Entry Sheet --> Set Status --> Revoke Acceptance .
    After that you can delete....but no Invoice must be exist.

  • PO Deletion indicator cannot be unset

    Hi,
    We want to change a material based Unit of measure from PC to EA, but the material has an open PO.
    1. We delete the PO item first with tcode ME22N then change the Material master (tcode MM02), change the based uom from PC to EA. done.
    2. Then go back to UNDELETE the PO item (ME22N), the following error message is displayed "Deletion indicator cannot be unset".
    How to resolve this error, we need to undelete the PO item after the material's has been changed.?? Urgent.

    Hi Eric,
    Sorry...mmr means material master record...
    1. Reset the BUoM from the new one to the old one
    1a) undelete the POs
    1b) use the mmr with original BUoM (that was reset in 1a) )
    or (reset the BUoM and undelete the POs and) create a new material master with desired BUoM and use this (instead of the original material master with new BUoM if the deleted POs are not OK for you).
    2. Keep the mmr with new BUoM with the delted PO items. As I know you can delete a PO item if GR/IR balance is OK for it so I think it shouldn't be problem.
    2a) If you want to get rid of partially delivered PO items >
    2a1) reste the BUoM from new one to the original
    2a2) undelete the partially delivered POs
    2a3) reduce the qty of these PO items to achieve that the should completely delivered and after that delete them
    2a4) set the new BUoM for your mmr
    2a5) create new PO items instead of the before reduced PO items with proper qty (with the mmr that has the new BUoM).
    BR
    Csaba

  • Scheduling agreement condition type default deletion indicator in backend system

    Dear team,
    our business process is that-
    In SRM system scheduling agreement is created. once its approved from SRM in Backend ECC R3 system the same is getting replicated.
    But in few of the cases its been obserbved that the condition pricing is flowing but with deletion indicator selected by default.
    I have checked the IDOC for the same but there is no value found flowing from SRM to ECC.
    Even searched for the same Material & same vendor in some cases only observed with deletion indicator.
    For entire scheduling agreement the deletion conditions are updating that is for all line item in scheduling agreement.
    There is no info record exists.
    Appreciate if anyone can throw some light over this.

    Appa K wrote:
    Even searched for the same Material & same vendor in some cases only observed with deletion indicator.
    What is the special cases ?
    I hope you are using time dependent condition for you SA document type.
    Check is it fetching from last PO or SA ?
    What is happening, when you are trying to create SA manually via ME31L for the same material and vendor?

  • Set deletion indicator in purchase requisition account assignment

    Hi Guys,
    Can you please help we with the solution to set deletion indicator in purchase requisition account assignment or close purchase requisition. A purchase requisition of $3.600.000,00 was created through Project system Network-External Processing and it has 2 duplicate network activities and $2.246.577,20 was converted to purchase order then $1,353,423 became the network remaining order plan. A purchase order service entry sheet was accepted and the invoice was created. Now Iu2019m experiencing problem when Iu2019m trying to change WBS element and Network system status to TECO in order to remove the remaining order plan of $1,353,423. Iu2019m getting error message number:06411 the procedure I have follow to correct the error is to reduce quantities in the account assignment item and delete superfluous account assignment by setting deletion in each case but I cannot do that because the fields are grey
    Regards
    Sandile

    Hi,
    please check first if the report ZMO_CORRECT_EBKN  from note 739004  can correct the problem.
    I would like to recommend you to check also the note 796973 whether the correction is avalilable in your coding, it should solve the issue.
    In case the problem still persists, please open a ticket to get help from the primary support in area MM-SRV.
    Regards,
    Edit

  • Preventing Deletion indicator in PR once work order is completed

    Dear colleagues,
    Users create work orders in IW31 with the choice of external service; control key is PM02. Once work order is saved purchase requisition (PR) is created in background. With reference to PR, purchase order (PO) is created by purchase specialist.
    When work order is technically completed (system status TECO) deletion indicator is set to PR line item(s) automatically which result in undesirable situations since PR(s) has subject to release strategy in our system.
    Is it possible to prevent setting deletion indicator in PR once reference work order is technically completed?
    Kind regards
    Melih

    Hi,
    In this case that behavior has negative effects on PR Workflow process because in our system when PR(s) is created it is subject to release strategy according to preconfigured conditions.
    Once the order is technically completed (TECO) deletion indicator is set to PR line item(s) automatically meanwhile release strategy tab is disappeared from PR line item(s).
    In addition to that in ME54N system gives the MEPO822 (Purchase requisition XXXXXXXXX cannot be released) message even PR is approved before the order is technically completed.
    Kind regards
    Melih

  • Service Material and Costing

    Hi
    We have set up a service material DIEN and placed a Sales Order and got it to Billing.
    The acounting doc is not creating due to "No standard cost for material".
    The standard material type DIEN does not have costing views. It is a service and therefore nothing to cost. .. but how do I prevent this?
    Any clues appreciated.
    Thanks
    Lee

    Hi
    Your requirement class settings must allow sales order as a cost object
    1. Go to sale order, procurement tab
    2. Check whats the req type
    3. Go to OVZH and check whats the req class assigned to this req type
    4. Go to OVZG and check whats the acount assignment cateory in req class.. Ideally, it should be E in your case
    5. The account assignment catg shud have consumption posting field as E
    6. Your Req Class would have Costing indicator / Costing Id, etc.. Choose the settings suitable to you...
    Ideally, it can be "Automatic Costing & Marking"
    br, Ajay M

  • Routing exist error in Material Deletion

    HI,
    At the time of archiving ,system shows the  following error message s.
             1. MARC : xxxxxx - routing exists
             2. MARC :xxxxxxx- Use in routing -inspection plan
    we have checked and found that  routing and inspection plan taask list for the problematic material but i dont know why system showing this error message .Kindly let me know how to resolve this issue.
    Thanks & regards,
    Renuga.A

    it  has only a deletion indicator - and it still exists , that is what SAP is complaining about. you have to archive the other objects first.

  • Retail Material Delete Flag

    Hello to All,
    We are using SAP-Retail ECC 6.0.
    How can I put delete Flag for Material Master Records ?
    Thank You

    Hi,
    As per SAP Note 743373, for Retail articles, it is not possible to set deletion indicator in tables MLGN and MLGT.  For standard materials, it is possible to use transaction MM06 to do so.
    For articles blocking, you can change validity of date in Listing to date in "Listing View" in Article Master.
    If you want to discontinue articles, then follow the steps;
    (a) Identify the list of articles for discontinuation (using transaction code WSE1)
    (b) After executing the program, system set deletion flag indicator
    You can set article discontinue at following levels;
    (a) For the Vendor
    (b) For the Assortment
    (c) For the Distribution Chain
    (d) Client-wide
    Hope this info will suffice your requirement.
    Regards - Muralidhara

  • Order Related Intercompany business process for Service material

    Hi
    I am looking for some info on Intercompany Business Process for service material - Order related.
    I have created Sales order (ZBOR) copied from standard sales order (TA / OR), a billing document (ZIVA) copied from IVA, an item category (ZTAD) copied from TAD standard.
    A material type used is DIEN (Services).
    Note 63459 indicated that I have to use a copy requirement 613 for item category ZTAD. The copy requirement 613 was created by copying requirement 013 according to the attached reference.
    I did the same according to the note. When I tried to create first billing document i.e. to end customer, its fine.
    When I create second billing document i.e. intercompany billing, its going to first pricing procedure and end customer as Payee, which should not happen. Rather it should go to intercompany pricing procedure (ICAA01) and to Internal customer as payee.
    Can someone guide me how to solve this issue?

    when i run intercompany billing (ZIVA), it goes to copy control routines 613 , buts its picking end customer pricing procedure and payee as end customer , not picking intercompany pricing procedure and internal customer as Payee.
    I am not sure what to do with 613 routinees as suggested by OSS note. All is i created this 613 copying from 13.
    Do i need to develop the logic of picking correct intercompany pricing procedure i.e ICAA01 , and need to get the right payee and some header information in this 613 routine . which means automatic pricing procedure determination is not done using customization in Order related Intercompany billing . Am i right to understand?
    Please suggest me how do i solve this issue.
    Please send it to my [email protected] email too.

  • PO and PIR price, Infoupdate, deletion indicator......

    Hello friends of MM,
    I have a strange situation.. There is an inforecord in the system, correct validity, correct PB00 condition, the price is taken in the PO. (even there is a PO created with different price, updated the price history of the PIR). So far so good.
    If I split the validity and set for the current validity a deletion indicator for PB00 condition (the only existing condition), the price is still adopted, without any messages, into PO price!!!
    If I mark for deletion PB00 for all the rest periods, the PIR price is still adopted in the PO!!!!
    Only after mark for deletion the PIR on Purch.org. level, things come to their place.
    All my efforts are just to try to set the system not to adopt the price from the last PO, if there is no current valid PIR price.....

    Thanks,  Sap: IN!
    It turns out that it is just a misunderstanding! While I was testing, a colleague of mine has created a PO with the same material and so the last PO price was not the one I was expecting - the system is taking the last PO price correctly, although referring in the condition table to the current conditions form the PO (which were marked for deletion).... A coincidence, which took several hours of my life
    Going to my task - to forbid price adoption from last PO - I set message 06219 "Net price for item & adopted from last document" to be error, but:
    1) It turns out it is displayed only in case I put manually a price in the PO, different form the last PO price and the system overwrites it; it is not displayed when system adopts the price, without any manual entry before that
    2) Even I set the message category to Error, I still get it Warning, although in F4 help it is written that this is settable and not hardcoded....
    Any ideas?

  • Tcode KKF6N Setting Deletion Indicator

    Hi ,
    When we try to set the deletion indicator for a material in Tcode KKF6N we get an error : "The balance on object ORDER NO.... is not zero.That is there is still costs on the object."
    I have tried variance calculation but returns saying no variances.
    Any suggestions ?
    Thanks
    Kartik

    Also check your settlement profile. 
    In our discrete orders, the settlement profile is set to "must be setttled" meaning the balance MUST be zero.  On some order that are simply "wrong" or very old and we don't want the numbers from previos FY to settle in current year, we change the indicator to "CAN BE settled" set the DLFL and thne change the indicator back.   
    Some issue are just too old or too wrong to fight through the correction - a journal entry is written to correct the GL and the order is set to DLFL
    Hope this is helpful.
    Althea

  • PR need to generate for Service material in third party process

    Dear All
    Is it possible to create Service PR for the service material in sale order like third party material.process
    Please suggest how to configure the same?
    Regards

    Hi,
    It is very much possible. please creat the third party vendor, and the service material.
    Do partner determination for the vendor in CS module and follow the ref. links.
    http://sap-sd-articles.blogspot.com/2009/03/sap-customer-service-processing-sd-sls.html
    http://www.sap-img.com/sap-sd/process-flow-for-3rd-party-sales.htm
    Also maintain copy controls for sales order type to billing type in case you want to use SD module itself.
    Regards
    DSR

  • Creating a service material.

    Hi All,
    One  of the user has sent a request to create a service material (Security Software). This is mainly for to improve security of the current billing  cycle. I used T-Code MM01 to created the material but later on instructed to create this material using T-code AC03. What is the difference of these two t codes when we create service material.Please explain.
    Thanks,
    Ama

    Hi,
    Service Material: Service is an intangible material. Since services cannot be stored and regarded as non-transportable and non-stockable. Typical services are commercial services, transport services, bank and insurance services, goods from cultural organizations and the mass media, as well as services provided by the public security forces or the education and health sectors.
    In case of Service ( if vendor providing to you)
    To map in SAP, we do maintain Service master (AC03) and create purchase order (ME21N) to vendor mentioning Cost Object and Item Category (D).Then service receipt in ML81N, Invoice verification ( MIRO ) and payment to vendor (F-53)
    In case of Material:
    We do create material (MM01), Purchase order; receive goods (MIGO) physically and Invoice verification and then payment to vendor.
    Note: Also Services are managed in the SAP R/3 System with DIEN material type (if you are providing service to customer)
    Regards,
    Biju K

Maybe you are looking for