Set Cursor to w.tax base (QSSHB) in FB60 through BTE event 1120

Is it possible to Set Cursor to w.tax base (QSSHB) in FB60 through BTE event 1120 .
I have to sum up the amt for GL Ac in BTE 1120 and dispay the msg.i have done upto this point.
Now i have to put the cursor to QSSHB with calcualted amt.so that user can go and change the amt.
Thanks in advance for any help. or is there any other way through user exit/badi.
Suresh.

Yes custom folders needs to be created and mapping needs to be copied and changed.
How ever in your instance you are just changing the size of the datatype ,so I dont see the necessity of creating the same.
When you create custom folders there is an effort involved.
Like
1)Create custom folders in Informatica repository.
2)Copy the required mappings.
3)Develop/customize mappings.
4)Create logical folders in DAC.
5)Assign the mappings to these folders.
5)Setup the connection parameters.
6)Needs Subject area to be assebmled
7)EP to be built again.
8)Also generate parameter to your custom folder as well.
I would suggest only there is any customziation(any new table addition,SQL change,adding more columns,changing the inbuilt logic etc) go with custom folder approach.
Mark correct or helpful if it helps,
Regards,
Veeresh Rayan
Edited by: Veeresh Rayan on May 12, 2013 12:04 PM

Similar Messages

Downpayment Clearing assumes Withholding tax base as 0, but calculates withholding tax

Hello All,
I have found a strange issue while trying to do a downpayment clearing. I tried to clear the downpayment with the invoice, while simulating before posting, the withholding tax line was simulated. After posting it, i found that the Withholding tax base amount has been taken as 0 and the tax amount has been calculated. Any reason how this could have happened?
Thanks,
Leena

Hi Leena,
Check the field WT_MASMAN in Table With_Item.
The fields mentions whether the base amount has been entered manually.
Normally, during posting, even if you put your cursor in the Tax base field, the System considers it as entered manually (even though you have not enetered anything).
BR
Amitash

How to deactivate withholding tax base amount field

Dear Experts,
My in client is using the extended withholding tax with setting Define Formulas for calculating withholding tax, my client feel that the tax base amount field is open and user may accidentally input the wrong amount there thus can anyone tell me how to deactivate this tax base amount field?
thank you

Dear,
Go into Withholding tax type under SPRO>Financial Accounting Global Settings>Withholding Tax>Extended Withholding Tax>Calculation>Withholding Tax Type.
While maintaining the Withholding Tax type you have selected "W/tax base manual" under the control data. Just don't select that option then your requirement will be met.
There are other options also like Manual W/tax amt. which you might want to go for.
Regards,
Chintan Joshi.

With holding tax base amount for 1099 vendors with discounted payment term

Hi Friends,
We have a below situation for 1099 vendors,
Some of the 1099 vendors are set-up in the system with payment term with discounts i.e. 2% if paid within 10 days
As per config, system posts with holding tax base amount at the time of posting payment.
With holding tax rate is 0%,
Based on modified net amount calculation
and
Cash discount calculation before w/tax calculation
When we have vendor with input tax, system excludes tax amount at the time of payment but for the with holding tax base calculation amount system does not exclude input tax type.
Which causes difference in 1099 misc vendors
Below is the example of how system calculates the amount.
Invoice $ 1000, payment term 2% if paid within 10 days. Input tax 7.25%
Payment going out=
$1000- $ 72.5(tax 7.25%) = $ 927.5 18.55 [2% discount] = $ 908.95 (payment amount)
With holding base calculation =
$ 1000 100 (2% discount) = $ 900
Difference between payment going out and with holding tax base = 908.98 900 = 8.98
Can some one please tell me how to get rid off this difference?
Moreover, please tell me if its normal to have 1099 vendors with discounted payment term.
Any thoughts on above situation will be helpful
Edited by: Shefford William on Jan 28, 2008 11:36 PM

Dear All
i am also having the same problem. The example is
Net invoice Value   = $ 100,000
Input Tax @ 15%   = $ 15,000
Total Invoice Value = $ 115,000
Cash Discount = 20% with in 20 days
On payment the system behavior should be
Debit Vendor invoice Value   = $ 115,000
Debit Cash Discount @ 20%    = $   20,000   ( 20% of the Net Invoice Value that is 20% of $ 100,000)
Credit W/H Tax deduction @ 3.5% = $ 3,325 ( 3.5% of 95,000 the Inv Value - Cash Discount that is $ 115,000 - $20,000)
Credit Bank Account = $ 91,675 ( Inv value - Cash Dic - W/H tax that is $ 115,000 - 20,000 - 3325 = 91,675)
However at the time of payment system is calculating tax as follows
Debit Vendor invoice Value   = $ 115,000
Debit Cash Discount @ 20%    = $   20,000   ( 20% of the Net Invoice Value that is 20% of $ 100,000)
Credit W/H Tax deduction @ 3.5% = $ 3,220 ( 3.5% of 92,000 the Inv Value - Cash Discount that is $ 115,000 - $23,000. This $ 23,000 is only calculated for W/H tax calculation that is 20% of $ 115,000 )
Credit Bank Account = $ 91,780 ( Inv value - Cash Dis - W/H tax that is $ 115,000 - 20,000 - 3220 = 91,780)
this is not the common practice when using the net base value in the system.
Can any one help me in this regard. I really have been stucked in this problem for many days
Regards
Bilal Athar

Changing Withholding tax base amount- 1099 invoice

Hi Friends,
Need your help again.
Using T. Code FB09, i can change WHT base as long as the invoice is not cleared. However, how to change WHT base where a particular invoice has been cleared?
I have actually made some cchanges to configuration where by i have removed tick for 'line item not cleared'. Ideally with this setting it should allow me to change to WHT base. But the same is not happening.
Can any one help me out with any other steps that are involved.
Thanks in advance,
Regards,
Rajanikanth

Hi Rajanikant,
Please review note 363650 here you will see the following
information;
C) Change Rules for classical and extended withholding tax
      If the withholding tax base amount should be changed after a
      docment has been paid already, the following steps are required:
      For Classical Withholding Tax and only if the withholding tax
     amount is zero.
     Change of withholding tax base amount or withholding tax code of a
     cleared invoice.
     If the withholding tax base amount and/or the withholding tax code
     needs to be changed after an invoice has been cleared please follow
     steps;
As you see from the above information the following quotation "only if
the withholding tax amount is zero".
If a withholding tax amount other than zero has been posted, you cannot
change the values via transaction FB02.
Please also review the IMG documentation for transaction OB32 via
spro -> Financial accounting -> Financial accounting global settings
-> Document -> Line item -> Document change rules, line item.
here you will see the following information;
Document Change Rules, Line Item
In this activity, you determine under which circumstances fields within
posted documents can be changed.
Note
For a number of fields, the system itself determines that they can no
longer be changed after posting. This includes all fields which are
central to the principles of orderly accounting, for example, the amount
posted and the account.
The system also prevents the update objects from being changed in
documents which have already been posted, independent of the document
change rules
Thus as you can see from the above description if an amount has been
posted to the account you cannot change the fields despite entering in
the field in OB32 as changable.
with kind regards
Cora

Tax Base Amount calculated wrongly

Dear Friends,
While posting a MIRO with a manually enter tax base amount, the amount doubles whenever I click on another tab like basic data and come back to tac base amount.
For e.g. I have a PO for 10000, now I am posting an invoice for the same but I have to pay only 9000 to the vendor because 1000 has been deducted as a penalty for late delivery.
Now I enter a MIRO, with reference to the purchase order and enter 9000 in the line item and trying to enter 10000 in the field Tax Base amount under the Tax tab.
Now whenever I change tabs, i.e if I go to Basic data and come back to Tax Tab, the amount has been changed to 19000. If change tabs again, it changes to 28000 and so on...
Not sure if this is a bug or has anyone faced this issue? Can anyone suggest a note or a solution...
Thanks,
Hari Dharen

Thank you Mani Kumar,
But that's what we already have in customizing:
The problem is that during Invoice Verification (MIRO) we specified that only one of the items is eligible to Cash Discount (we set for item #2 that it is W/o Cash Discount):
The invoice is posting correctly identifying the correct disc. amount of 1,500 (50,000*3%):
The problem is during the Payment Run where the system determines a Cash Discount that applies but when calculating the W/Tax Base Amount it do the following:
51,000*3% = 1,530
W/Tax Base = 51,000 - 1,530 = 49,470 usd
F110 Proposal generated:
It is false that the Cash Discount applies to all items, the expected result should be:
(only eligible items for Cash Discount) 50,000*3% = 1,500
W/Tax Base = 51,000 - 1,500 = 49,500 usd not 49,470
Thanks

Consignment and Tax Base Amount

All,
We are getting the error "the tax amount must not be greater than the tax base".   When doing a trace the Tax Base Amount is ZERO.   Can someone tell me where/how the tax base amount is determined?
Thank you,
Sandra

What I have found so far is the system calculates the base amount by adding the line items that have a tax code associated with it. In the scenario I have it appears the tax code is not associated with any of the items on the settlement and therefore the tax base = 0.
This is SAP standard transaction MRKO in a 4.5B system.   The info record has a tax code on it and it does not appear to matter which tax code in on the info record.
Anyone have any ideas on where I can look or what to look for?    Is this a tax set up issue? Is it a program error?   I've tried to find all the tax configuration and compare with a working example in the same system but have not been successful. I've also looked in OSS and there are several OSS notes that are remotely related to consignment and taxes but we are on a fairly high hotpack # so .... just not sure where to go.
Thanks for any suggestions.
Sandra

Changing withholding tax base

Hi Friends,
Need your help again.
Using T. Code FB09, i can change WHT base as long as the invoice is not cleared. However, how to change WHT base where a particular invoice has been cleared?
I have actually made some changes to configuration(OB32) where by i have removed tick for 'line item not cleared'. Ideally with this setting it should allow me to change to WHT base. But the same is not happening.
Can any one help me out with any other steps that are involved.
Thanks in advance,
Regards,
Rajanikanth

Hi,
settings done in OB32 may not help you with the documents already been cleared , but this settings may be helpful for the future documents posting and clearing functions.
For the alredy claered documents, you must have to reset(FBRA) the claered document first and the try to reverse it(FB08) and post them again with required tax base amount.
Dhara

Tax base amount in MIRO transaction

hi!
I want to change the tax base amount in MIRO transaction as per my client requirement. But in MIRO i am unable to change the base amount means even if i change the base amount , if i tick the calculated tax check box, it is taking original material cost amount.
Can any one tell how to solve this problem?
regs,
ramesh B

Hi
You can change the tax base amount at time of invoice verification - for this you need to set change base amount indicator in Financial account global settings -> tax on sales/purchases -> basic settings -> change field control for base amount -> enter you country's calculation procedure and check the change indicator.
After setting this at time of IV, you can enter tax base amount and tax under tax tab.
Thanks

Query on Grouping Tax Base Balances for Italian Report Customer/Vendor List

Hello Experts,
We are implementing the new italian report for customer/vendor List as per Note : 1090857 - Customer/Vendor List for Italy:New Legal Requirement (2007)
This requires a customizing in Table/View V_T007K(Group Tax Base Balances) where we need to group the tax codes.
Based on what logic is this table required to be maintained and what considerations need to be taken care of when mainting the tax codes for each column.
Anyone who has maintained this table or who is ware of the procedure and logic of maintainance , could kindly advise on the same.
Points would be awarded for any helpful answer.
Thanks & Regards,
Rajeshwari

Hello,
Thanks for your answer,
On what basis should the grouping be done.
Is it only based on the tax codes types?
or is there any specific rule.
has anyone maintained this grouping for a Italian company code before?
Points would be awarded immediately for any help in this.
Thanks & Warm Regards,
Rajeshwari

Different Tax base in pricing procedure for a single sales order for different line item material.

Hi,
I have a scenario wherein in a sales order, for two different material, the tax base of pricing should get triggered on the basis of sold to party and the material entered at line item level.
Logic triggers on the basis of Region of Customer & a unique field in the Material Master but problem comes in the calculation of Tax base as the sequence of condition type (from – to) is already defined in the pricing procedure to pick from a particular step but in second line item the base is different i.e. the sequence of condition types that are maintained in pricing procedure should be different for Tax to calculate differently.
Kindly suggest if the same can be handled in a single pricing procedure and dynamically taking care of condition type sequence through Alt Cal Base Formula, so far I’ve tried both Alt Cal Formula & Base but it is not working
Client doesn’t want to go ahead by creating two different orders (through separate Pricing Procedure) for that. They want to have both materials in same order.
Kindly suggest a suitable way to handle this scenario.
Regards,
Aashika Agarwal

Hi,
Click on the ''check availability'' button at item overview and then click on ''One-time delivery'' on the top. This will ensure that you will have only one delivery for whatever quantity is confirmed on that date.
If you want to apply this rule for all orders across a sales area, then you can do the below configuration step :
SPRO->sales and distribution->basic functions->availability check with ATP logic->Define default settings-> Here in avail. checking rule select A (one time delivery). This will ensure that all orders created for a particular sales area will have only one delivery.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Palani

Set cursor in a specific view of transaction MM01/MM02

Hi,
We have to check a condition in the user-exit EXIT_SAPLMGMU_001, for transaction MM01/MM02, and if the condition fails the client wants to set the cursor in a specific field from a specific view. Is it possible? I tried to use the sentence SET CURSOR referenced to a remote program but it doesn't work.
Does anybody knows how to solve this problem?
Thanks in advance
Regards
Maribel

Hi
I hope, you have read the documetation attached with this Standard Enhancement - MGA00001.
EXIT_SAPLMGMU_001
Where Is the Customer Exit - EXIT_SAPLMGMU_001 called?
The customer exit is in function module MATERIAL_UPDATE_ALL. The
function module checks the data for errors (logical relationships,
foreign keys, fixed domain values, and so on) when the material master
is updated.
Use
o New fields
You can make checks possible for new fields of your own. These
checks must be identical to the checks that you carry out for your
new fields in online maintenance.
o Existing fields
For existing fields, you can extend and intensify the checks.
You can also change data for descriptions and general material data
(MARA). For example, the descriptions can be generated from attributes
of the material.
Limitations
You cannot bypass existing checks.
Interface to Application
The respective data of the current logical transaction is contained in
the structures, for example, in structure WMARA for MARA. Nonrelevant
structures are transferred with their initial values.
General material data that can be changed (CMARA) has the structure
MARU. This MARA view contains fewer internal fields than MARA itself. If
WMARA is filled, CMARA is also filled when accessed.
The customer exit contains the exception APPLICATION_ERROR for your
self-defined error situations.
Using the language element MESSAGE .. RAISING APPLICATION_ERROR, you can
terminate the current (logical) transaction and display your message in
the log.
Also, I guess, have you put some code in the Includes available with the EXITS and then activated the Project in CMOD.
<b>Reward points</b>
Regards

Set cursor in Control String component

Hello:
I would like to set cursor in "Control String" automatically when I open my VI. If I open my VI, cursor should be seen automatically in the text field of "Control String". The user hasn`t set cursor by mouse into this field. Has anybody an idea how can I do?
Thanks!

Create a property node for the control on your block diagram and set the Key Focus property value to TRUE.
http://zone.ni.com/reference/en-XX/help/371361H-01/lvprop/ctrl_key_focus/
Now is the right time to use %^<%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%S%3uZ>T
If you don't hate time zones, you're not a real programmer.
"You are what you don't automate"
Inplaceness is synonymous with insidiousness

Set Cursor.vi fails after it has been called for 30 different panel refs in LV 7.1.1

Make sure both attached files (Run LabVIEW_Cursor_TestCase.vi, SimpleVI.vi) are in the same folder. Run LabVIEW_Cursor_TestCase.vi notice that the -3 error code is returned from "Set Cursor.vi" after it has been called with 30 different panel refs. If "Set Cursor.vi" is replaced with "Set Busy.vi" the same error occurs.Is there a workaround for this problem other that setting the cursor image manually in user32.dll? I must be able to open more than 30 panels and set them all to busy. In the test case I used a single VI, simply to demonstrate the error.
Message Edited by Jerred on 05-04-2007 10:06 AM
Attachments:
LabVIEW_Cursor_TestCase.vi ‏68 KB
SimpleVI.vi ‏13 KB

This bug is fixed in LabVIEW 8.0 and later. Unfortunately, I know of no workaround in LabVIEW 7.x. When I encountered this bug in one of my UIs in LabVIEW 7.x, my "fix" was simply to ignore the error outputs from the cursor VIs, and to live with the fact that I had no custom cursors after 30 windows had been opened.
-D
Darren Nattinger, CLA
LabVIEW Artisan and Nugget Penman

Error Message FF747 -The tax amount must not be greater than the tax base

Hello,
We are attempting to post an import vendor invoice through transaction FB60 for Israel company code . Since the tax charged by the vendor is not fixed every time , we are entering the tax amount in the FB60 screen manually , without selecting 'calculate tax'.The amount of tax is greater than the amount of expense as per the real business scenario. For example amount of expense is 100, amount of tax is 200 and the total amount charged by the vendor is 300 .However when we simulate the posting we get an error - The tax amount must not be greater than the tax base-Message no. FF747
We tried putting a very high percentage in the tax code also but it didn't help
We would like to go ahead with this posting. Could you pl throw light on the same . ? Is there any way (OSS note ) or a work around which can resolve the issue ?
Best Regards
Amit Kulkarni

Hello
This may be a work around in other cases , but since we want the amount to be updated in the BSET table for further VAT reports , we would like this to be posted along with the expense item

Set Cursor to w.tax base (QSSHB) in FB60 through BTE event 1120

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for