Settlement of order

1.We are operating many GLs for posting against PM order
2.We want to settle the cost of PM order to another  GL account.(external settlement)
3.In settlement rule we have mentioned GL account  and settlement receiver  a cost centre is  specified( the Automatic Account Assignment is getting picked up from the default CC defined in OKB9)
But the requirement is to settle the PM order to a GL and any cost center of choice .... is this possible ?? And if yes then what are the additional settings to be done??
Thanks in advance
Shivaji

Hi
Normally if you want to settle to GL Account (External Settlement), even after the settlement the cost object is PM Order only.
There is no choice of entering the cost center of your choice other than the OKB9 setting.
Regards,
Suraj

Similar Messages

  • Standard report for settled internal orders

    Hi All,
    Is there any standard report available in Asset for settled internal orders.
    We can able to see in S_ALR_87013019.  But all Internal orders are appearing.  I am not able to see settled orders.  How to identify those... (Like flag color difference should be required for settled and open).
    Thanx in advance.
    Regs,
    Bhaskar

    Hi All,
    Is there any standard report available in Asset for settled internal orders.
    We can able to see in S_ALR_87013019. But all Internal orders are appearing. I am not able to see settled orders. How to identify those... (Like flag color difference should be required for settled and open).
    Thanx in advance.
    Regs,
    Bhaskar

  • How to settle an order

    Dear Consultants,
    I have created an order in CO01...
    I have done everything with that order.. the status of the order is DLV...
    Kindly tell me how to settle the order...In detail..
    Thank you all..
    karthick

    Dear,
    You should follow following steps for Order Settlement after confirmation :
    1. After Final Confirmation of Order ( Status : CNF) make GR for for order using Tcode : MIGO / MB31 so Production Order Status will be DLV.
    2. Then complete the order technically by using Tcode : CO02--> Functions ( Menu)---> Restrict Processing -
    > Technically Complete. You can carry out TECO for multiple Orders in Tcode : COHV (Mass Processing).
    3.Now Calculate Overheads using Tcode : KGI2 - Individual Processing
    CO43 - Collective Processing
    4.Calculate WIP using Tcode : KKAX - Individual Processing
    KKAO - Collective Processing
    5.Calculate Variance by using Tcode : KKS2 - Individual Processing
    KKS1 - Collective Processing
    6.Finally do the settlement of Order in Tcode : KO88 - Individual Processing
    CO88 - Collective Processing
    Hope this helps.
    Regards,
    Tejas

  • Error in Settlement production order

    Hi,
    I am facing follow error when try to settled production order in KO88.
    There are no accrued amounts; settlement is not possible
    Message no. KD256
    Diagnosis
    The sender has a results analysis key, but no accrued values.
    Either the accrual was not yet started for the sender, or the values to be settled from the accrual equal zero.
    Note
    Actual costs are only settled once the sender is technically completed or finally delivered.
    This applies to
    Projects that cannot carry revenues
    In Service Management for sales order production to the indicator (Calculate WIP for orders in sales order production) set in the accrual version for
    Production orders
    Internal orders with no revenues
    Orders with no revenues
    In Service Management for engineer-to-order production to the indicator (Calculate WIP for orders in engineer-to-order production ) set in the accrual version for
    Internal orders with no revenues
    Orders with no revenues
    In Service Management to the indicator (Calculate WIP for internal and service orders with no revenues) set in the accrual version for
    Internal orders with no revenues
    Orders with no revenues
    To the indicator (Calculate WIP for production orders without settlement to material) set in the accrual version for
    Production orders without settlement to material
    Procedure
    1. If necessary, start the accrual calculation for the sender
    2. Restart settlement
    Raja.

    Hi AP,
    First of all thanks for you are paying continue attention on my thread.
    I have checked in production order that goods are issued against the production orders and costs are captured.
    When I run KKAX,facing following error.Hope you can solve this.
    There are values for cost element 50200000 that are not assigned to any line ID
    Message no. KJ161
    Diagnosis
    Not all values for the cost element are assigned to a line ID.
    Procedure
    Assign the cost element to a line ID. If you don't want to include the cost element in results analysis, assign it to a line ID of category N.
    You can access a detailed list of unassigned cost elements as follows: Start results analysis in the individual processing mode (transaction KKA1, KKA2, or KKA3). Select the field Full log. Execute the function. On the next screen, choose Logs -> Parameter List in the menu. A list is generated. The unassigned values are shown at the end of the list.
    If cost element "+++++++++" was shown in the message, this is because in the assignment of costs and revenues to line IDs, you have not used a cost element other than the full masking "+++++++++". In this case a presummarization eliminates the information on the cost element.
    Raja.

  • Results Analysis Settle Internal Order (from CRM) - No cost element allowed

    In SPRO results analysis configuration to "Define Posting Rules for Settlement to Financial Accounting" I am not allowed to use an account with a cost element.  (Error: I get error KQ 119 G/L account ### cannot be created as a cost element.)
    I configure a G/L account with no cost element.  KO88 Settlement posts to G/L account fine; however, does not post to the internal order because the config mentioned on first line does not allow me to use an account with a cost element. 
    Problem: I am unable to see settlement in KOB1 report because settlement goes to GL Account, but does not post to the internal order.
    Failed solution:  I tried to use OKC9 substitution at KO88 to substitute the internal order number.  The problem is that table AUFKV is empty when the substitution runs at KO88 settlement.  I am not able to substitute the order number because the order number isn't even available in the substitution at internal order settlement.
    I put a break manual break point in program GBTACCOB at the call to the substitution rule I defined.  The breakpoint stops at the substitution when I run KO88 settlement; however, fields are blank. I am unable to do substitution.  I know this works because I have a similar substitution on the same internal order for accounting indicator when doing an MB1A goods issue to an internal order.  The break point stops there and the AUFKV data is available for substitution rule.
    Question:
    Any suggested solutions to to have internal order update into KO88 settlement after KKA1 results analysis would be helpfull.

    It is more of a reporting issue really. 
    The problem is that internal order settlement with settlement profile instead of results analysis does post the settlement to the internal order and does use a cost element.  This is the business process the users currently have.  Our users have a requirement to settle the orders weekly.  This helps them find issues earlier and speeds up the month end close.
    In the past we could use KOB1 and see the current balance of an internal order and see the settlement.  Now that report no longer shows the settlement.  How can I see what has been settled on an order and what hasn't now?

  • Settling Internal order

    Hey Guys,
    I am using internal orders as capital investment programs.
    These are the steps i did
    1- created the order( AUC gets creted automatically)
    2- entered the budget
    3 Posted to the order
    4- settled it- Using processing type 1( automatic)- after settlign the settlement rule populates through config. This moves the cost from the IO to the AUC
    now i need to settle the order again using processing type 8( full settlement) to move values from the AUC to the asset.
    It gives me the message that there is nothign to settle or the order is settled.
    am i missing any step?
    please advice
    THanks,
    Zaid

    Thanks for the reply-
    my settlement rule is
    CAT     recevier     percent    settlement
    FXA    3-0              100         AUC
    This settlment rule comes up automatically once i settle the I/O.
    I need to add a settlement rule below this?
    please clarify
    Thanks,
    Zaid

  • Cancel settlement internal order

    Hi,
    I just created the AUC and Internal Order then run settlement Internal Order (KO88), but there's something wrong at the time of create Internal Order. Whether we can cancel the settlement IO? if yes, how to do that ?
    Thanks
    Ocep00

    Hi
    In KO88 > Menu Settlement > Reverse
    Regards
    Ajay M

  • Reversal of Settled Process Order

    Please tell my how can we reverse already settled process order?
    Its Urgent

    Hi Sapna,
    You can reverse the settled process order as shown in the below picture.  Give the order number and provide other details required. Select Reverse under Settlement tab from the main menu and execute under "Test Run" initially for clarity. Later, remove the test run and execute the same.
    BR, Srinivas Salapla

  • Can we settle refurbishment order periodically

    Hi All
    our client want to settle refurbishment order periodically to material.
    In standard SAP will allow this after TECO.
    They r taking more time to complete these orders and costs are setteled in Orders and not reflecting in monthly cost balance sheet.
    can we settele initially to one separate cost center and tranfer cost (oder wise ) to material after teco.
    It should reflect that the cost should be reduced in cost center and updated in material

    Hi,
    Please note that in refurbishment case cost is settled to material and this settlement need to be periodic.
    You can do settlement after TECO. TECO is technical completion and settlement can be done after TECO also.
    However as you said cost are settled to cost centre ,but how it is possible coz settlement receiver is material and not cost centre for refurbishment.They may not able to see correct costs in respective period but cost will always get settled to material(means added to inventory accounts after settlement).
    It is advisable to settle incurred costs on refurbishment order as early as possible,so costs will reflect into inventory accounts and within correct period and this is standard practice also.
    regds,
    atul
    Edited by: Atul Mali on Apr 15, 2009 1:52 PM

  • Can we settle refurbishment order(Plant Maintenance) periodically

    Hi All
    our client want to settle refurbishment order periodically to material.
    In standard SAP will allow this after TECO.
    They r taking more time to complete these orders and costs are setteled in Orders and not reflecting in monthly cost balance sheet.
    can we settele initially to one separate cost center and tranfer cost (oder wise ) to material after teco.
    It should reflect that the cost should be reduced in cost center and updated in material
    Thanks in advance
    gangs

    Hi,
    this seems like a WIP (work in progress) scenario, maybe you can try a results analysis version.
    best regards,
    Luis

  • Setting an job for closing settled process orders

    Hi PP Gurus,
    I have a requirement to set a background job to close the process orders that have been settled and have not been modified with a certain time frame.
    Are there any standard programs which support this requirement of influencing the selection parameters like settled + eligibility  time frame? How to identify the settled process orders in SAP?
    Regards,
    Ramana

    Hi,
    After the settlement, no particular status is updated in the process order. Hence not possible to select only those orders to close which have been settled.
    Workaround I can think of is, in Tcode COHVPI, select those orders which have status TECO and VCAL, my argument would be orders which have status TECO and Variance calculated would be settled most of the time (Say 99%).
    Hence set the parameters for background job as status TECO and VCAL. Then go to mass processing tab, select the function COMPLETE, select BACKGROUND in execute function option and create a variant and save.
    In SM36 create job, enter the program PPIO_ENTRY, enter the variant created in the earlier step, schedule the date and time.
    Regards
    Vinod

  • What are disadvantages and limitaions if we are not settling the orders

    Dear All,
    I wanted to know What are all teh disadvantages if we are don't settle the orders.
    And how it will impacts the bussiness process.
    Please suggest and give your comments
    Thanks

    Hi,
    entries from pur to sales.
    RM Purchase GRN / Challan (MIGO)    RM Stock              DR
                                                             GR / IR Clearing     CR
    Ex invoice-Incomming (J1IEX)              CENVAT BED Input
                                                            CENVAT E-Cess Input
                                                            CENVAT Clearing
    Purchase Invoice (MIRO)                    GR / IR Clearing
                                                            CENVAT Clearing                                                                               
    RM AP VAT Deductible
                                                            VENDOR
    RM Issue for Production (CO11N)    RM Consumption
    (against Production Order)              RM Stock
    FG Received after Production (CO11N)  FG Stock
                                                              COGM
    Sales Delivery (VL01N)                     FG Stock
                                                          COGS
    Sales Billing (VF01)                         CUSTOMER
                                                          Sales                                                                               
    VAT Payable
    Excise Invoice-Outgoing (J1IIN)      Ex Duty Exp
                                                      CENVAT Payable
                                                      E-Cess Payable.

  • When Im going to settle the order following error pop up........ Pls help t

    When Im going to settle the order following error pop up........ Pls help to solve this
    " Balance for transaction type group 10 negative for the area 01"  
    Reg
    K

    Hi
    Please refer this thread,
    [Thread.|Error when posting credit memo in current year;
    Regards,
    R.Brahmankar

  • Error while settling internal order KO88 / KO8G)

    Hi Friends,
    We are in ECC5.0
    I have an expense G/L account. Cost center and Business Area are mandatory to post in to this G/L account.
    I posted some transactions to this G/L account with Business Area, Cost center and Internal order values in the document. When I try to settle this internal order to AUC, I am getting error 'Cost center is mandatory for G/L account xxxxxx'.
    I am not sure, why it is not picking the cost center and Business Area from the original document. Please could any one advice me?
    Thanks in advance

    Hi Waman and Ajay,
    Thanks for your information.
    Sorry to ask a basic question:
    while we run the settlement, will  G/L entry have a cost center in the document?
    If I have a debit line in expense G/L with cost center cc1 and order or1, when I settle this order, it will post a credit entry. But I am not sure if this credit entry will have cost center in that line?
    If yes, how will be the entry for multiple debit lines with multiple costcenters? Because, when we settle the G/L, it will post only one line item as credit for the total amount.
    Please could you help me in understanding?
    Thanks,

  • TO SETTLE PROCESS ORDER

    Which Tcode is used to settle Process order and tell me the Procedure?

    hi,
    you can follow and check with this below steps:
    1) First you can check with that all the Goods issue is complted from the Production order
    2)you can check with GR of the order is completed or not.
    3)you can use the tcode production order change COR2 and do the TECO for the production order (PRODCUTION ORDER --> FUNCTIONS --> Restrict processing -->TECHNICALLY COMPLETE)
    5.If you are using the individual order, use the tcode KO88 - Individual Processing
    if you are using the collective, use the tcode CO88 - Collective Processing
    let me know any clarification. pls reward your points.
    regards,
    mohan r

  • Differences in parallel currencies after settlement internal order

    Hi everybody,
    Please help me with any tip.
    After the settlement of internal order, the balance of currency of the company (10-BRL) is zero, it is OK, but the problem is the balance in hard currency (40-USD) there is difference.
    Scenario Currency FI (OB22):
    > 1st local currency:
    Crcy Type: 10 - company code currency - Currency: BRL
    Valuation: 0 Legal Valuation
    ExRateType: M - Standard translation at average rate.
    Srce curr: 1 - Translation taking transaction currency as a basis
    TrsDte typ: 3     Translation date
    > 2st local currency:
    Crcy type: 40 - Hard currency
    Valuation: 0 - Legal Valuation
    ExRateType: M - Standard translation at average rate
    Srce curr.: 1 - Translation taking transaction currency as a basis
    TrsDte typ: 1 - Document date
    Scenario Currency CO (OKKP):
    > Assignment Control > CoCd->CO Area = Cross-company-code cost accounting
    Currency Type:10 - Company code currency
    Currency: BRL
    No flag : Diff. CCode Currency
    No flag: Active
    The test is:
    1st - Posting with internal order (FB60)
    2nd - Settlement internal order (KO88)
    3rd - FBL3N
    Look the result by currency:
    G/L: 800068, Post Date: 30/11/09, Doc Date: 27/11/09, LCurr: BRL, Amount: 1000,00-, LCurr2: USD, Amount loc curr2: 666,67-
    G/L: 800068, Post Date: 27/11/09, Doc Date:01/10/09, LCurr: BRL, Amount: 1000,00, LCurr2: USD, Amount loc curr2: 500,00
    Balance of LCurr: BRL = 0,00
    Balance of LCurr2: USD = 166,67 (Difference). Is there a procedure to dealing with differences in hard currency (USD) after settlement of internal order?
    Tks
    Soraia

    In your opinion, Does the configuration in OKKP is correct?
    Scenario Currency CO (OKKP):
    > Assignment Control > CoCd->CO Area = Cross-company-code cost accounting
    Currency Type:10 - Company code currency
    Currency: BRL (Brazilian Currency)
    No flag : Diff. CCode Currency
    No flag: Active
    Where is BRL I think that should be USD.
    The system do the exchange rate ok, but what about the difference because of it? Is there any problem continue with it?
    G/L: 800068, Post Date: 30/11/09, Doc Date: 27/11/09, LCurr: BRL, Amount: 1000,00-, LCurr2: USD, Amount loc curr2: 666,67-
    G/L: 800068, Post Date: 27/11/09, Doc Date:01/10/09, LCurr: BRL, Amount: 1000,00, LCurr2: USD, Amount loc curr2: 500,00
    Balance of LCurr: BRL = 0,00
    Balance of LCurr2: USD = 166,67 (Difference).
    Thank you!
    Soraia

Maybe you are looking for