Settlement problem in Claim

Hi,
I am creating claim. In the assignment tab, I am giving WBS Element. After costing & Approval, Internal Order created while saving the claim.
When I run report, S_ALR_87013533, The value of internal order is coming in RemOrd.Plan,Assigned & availabe it is showing the same amount in Negative.
After Excution all activities in that WBS, I am setting the cost to Internal Order. After settlement, in report S_ALR_87013533, Actual value is showing Twice the value. In execution, I am getting Actual Value. After settlement it is going to Internal order and updating WBS also.
My requirement is, Inter nal order values (Plan&Actual) should not update the WBS. How to acheive this?
Regards
Suresh

Check the setting maintained in OPSV. You might have created seprate catagory for claim order (internal order) and checked the check box in column Addl. for category.
Sudhir

Similar Messages

WBS Settlement Problem

we are settling the WBS to asset under construction.
while executing the transaction CJ88, system prompt the following error message.
================================================================
Field Cost Ctr is a required field for G/L account 1400 Z0110201
Message no. F5808
Diagnosis
The value for field "Cost Ctr" in the interface to Financial Accounting is an initial value but you are required to make an entry in the field selection for G/L account "Z0110201" in company code "1400" linked to the field selection for posting key "50".
System Response
Error
Procedure
It might be an error in the configuration of the G/L account field selection. The initial application, used to call up the interface must otherwise define a value for field "Cost Ctr". If this is the case, contact the consultant responsible for the application used to call up the interface or get in contact with SAP directly.
======================================================
we know the cost centre is required on our GL. we also passing the GL entry on that GL with Cost center & WBS Elemenet.
Thanks

Hi
Try with this go to posting key field status if cost center is mandatory make it optional. Before doing it analyze the business scenario why cost cetner is made mandatory for posting key 50. There should not be any problems further
Cheers
Muralidhar

Problem in Claim Advances in ESS

Hi All,
When we are raising a Claim Advance request in ESS It is giving the msg Sent for approval. But It is not coming to Approver's Inbox (UWL). What might be the reason . Please help.
Thanks,
Punam

Hi Anil,
We implemented the BADI also and it is perfectly working and giving the approver name and determining the approver group also. Actually we could able to raise the Claim request successfully and it is generating the claim number also. If we run the HINUACRP report there item is also present with the status " To be approved " by the determined approver by BADI. the problem is it is not triggering the workflow and the item is not going to Approver's workflow inbox and UWL to get the approval screen. Can any body help about the workflow settings ,Agent list and Probable agent list settings needed for this.?
Please help.
Thanks in advance.

Co-product actual settlement problem

Hi Gurus,
I have a co-product problem. We have ML active.
We are going to use production orders in PP side but REM scenario in CO side. Under this condition is co-product usage effected?
Another problem is this, we have not a certain ratio between primary product and co-product. In the apportionment structure a ratio can be defined. With the creation of the production order, these ratios are going to be transferred from the material master to settlement rule.
During the production process, as I said before, the ratio is not realized, there are variances from the ratio. At the end of the period when we want to settle the order, the ratio is stable in the settlement rule. In other words, it is not actual, just planned ratios.
My question is this: Is it possible to change settlement rule during settlement in the base of realized production (101 movement type) quantities? How can we provide this, otherwise the result is not true in terms of actual costing .
Ahmet

Hi
I thnk you can specify a % in your settlement rule along with Source Structure
br, Ajay M

ICLCDC01-Problem in Claim Creation

Hi,
I am in the process of creating claims; for the same I am using the transaction ICLCDC01. In this transaction I pass the Policy Number; Incident Type as the header data and I create a subclaim for the same.
After entering the payment details and when I try to save the claim I am getting an error "Reconciliation cannot be opened for the key" and "Collection/Disbursements cannot process payment". How do I resolve these errors?
Thanks.
Kanthimathi

Hi Anil,
We implemented the BADI also and it is perfectly working and giving the approver name and determining the approver group also. Actually we could able to raise the Claim request successfully and it is generating the claim number also. If we run the HINUACRP report there item is also present with the status " To be approved " by the determined approver by BADI. the problem is it is not triggering the workflow and the item is not going to Approver's workflow inbox and UWL to get the approval screen. Can any body help about the workflow settings ,Agent list and Probable agent list settings needed for this.?
Please help.
Thanks in advance.

Partial settlement problem

Hi All,
I am facing problem with partial settlement, we are using the partial settlement process line item wise using KOB5.
Mow there 5 line item which was posted in same period Now we want to settle only 3 Line item.
We set the Settlement rule and we run the settlement process now it settle all the amount those posted this period what we do it is production system problem.
Please help me.
Regards,
Juhi

Juhi,
Can you send me the following screenshots at the email id attached to my business card?
1. Configuraiton of the investment profile used in the internal order
2. KOB5 screenshot of the internal order in question.
This will enable me to help you futher.
To your question on any problem if the rule is deleted. there should not be any problem. Settlement rule changes are pretty standard process which people do. One may have to change a rule or delete it. It poses no threat as such as far as I know.
Also I would suggest you to simulate the scenario in your QA system. That would give you a lot of insight.
Best regards,
Vishal.

Input multiplexer settling problem

NI Multifunction Cards have often a multiplexer before the A/D converter, which allows scanning multiple channels. NI observes that the settling time of this multiplexer may cause problems, especially when an input signal has a considerably higher amplitude than the nearby signal. Here the setlling time does not allow fast scanning because this results in "noise" on the smaller signal due to "memory" of the large one.
Is there a known solution to this problem ?
I tried to keep source impedances around 1 KOhm as suggested by NI, but this did not yield to a complete solution, rather to a slight noise reduction.
Is there a known way to use multifunction NI cards for input scanning with no inherent noise channel-by-channel ?
Thanks a lot
for attention,
Marco
Marco Sartore
ElbaTech srl
Via Roma, 1 57030 Marciana (LI)
Italy

Marco,
There are a few solutions that can help with the charge injection problem. The optimal solution is to decrease the impedance of your sources. The smallest source impedance is ideal. So, if you have sources at or above 1 Kohm, it would be good to use a unity-gain buffer to decrease the source impedance.
Other solutions involve increasing the inter-channel delay of scanning and/or grounding channels in between channels to allow the multiplexer to discharge. I have linked a couple documents below that go over charge injection in detail and the viable solutions.
How Do I Create a Buffer to Decrease the Source Impedance of My Analog Input Signal?
http://digital.ni.com/public.nsf/websearch/CF83426BC3AC514A86256C10005A4771?OpenDocument
Using a Unity G
ain Buffer (Voltage Follower) with a DAQ Device
http://zone.ni.com/devzone/conceptd.nsf/webmain/CD57A73721E0612586256BAE0055CDD9?opendocument
Regards,
Todd D.

Settlement problem

Hey guys,
I am creating a settlement profile to settle costs from a work order to a G/L account and a cost center. Initially the cost center is coming from OKB9 , I want these costs to settle to the G/L account entered in the settlement rule and the cost center from OKB9 should be credited and the cost center on the equipment master ( in the work order) should be debited.
Currently I am able to do this If I enter a cost element in the settlement profile and enter a cost center on the settlement rule of the order.
How can I get the system to determine the cost center from the equipment master? I will manually enter a GL account in the settlement rule of the order to get it to settle to the G/L.
Egg
Initial entry
CR inventory
DR Raw materials ( cost center A)
At the time of settlement
DR Raw materials ( cost center from settlement rule) - I need this to come from the cost center of the equipment
CR raw materials? ( this line item has no cost object-
This is the current entry generated- I am not sure if this is correct

solved

Transaction AIAB (Auc Settlement) - Problem with BDC

Dear Friends,
Problem: I am trying to distribute the amount of a asset (Auc) to other assets on line item basis by using BDC for transaction AIAB. I am facing problems when using amount based through BDC.
Can you please suggest ASAP if any FM or BAPI's available to achive this for transaction AIAB?
Thanks,
Ram.

Hi Ravi,
Thanks for your valuable reply..
Everything is fine if i run the transaction in ALLSCREEN mode, but iam facing the problem with the same after running it in NOSCREEN mode 'N'..
Pls help..

There is dust in my screen ipad2 but have more problem to claim

I have ipad2 which have dust in my screen, but i have a dent on my corner side the right one. I still can claim it or not? The dust is very annoying :(

Take it to an Apple Store for evaluation. Normally with dust under the screen, Apple will replace the iPad. With the dent, it's hard to say what Apple will say.
Make a Genius Bar Reservation
http://www.apple.com/retail/geniusbar/
 Cheers, Tom

Settlement Problem of WBS

HI All !!
I need to create a project to cater the cost like travelling, general expenses, electricity charges etc and then settle the amount on monthly basis to cost center. (I need to create this to have better control on these costs)
I've created the wbs and done the budgeting. Now when i assign the settlement rule as cost center with 100% and FUL settlement it gives me an error "maintain the distribution rule for G/L account without validity limit". So, to remove this error I randomly selected a g/l account and set the percentage to 0% and FUL and in No column its 2 ... so the question, is this correct ? will all the cost be settled into cost center and no cost will be settled in GL account ? (I can't change the settlement profile)
thanks

Thanks for the replies Sreekanth & Nitin
But i want to know will this setting work?? i dont have a testing system in my company and also i cant change the profile .. my first analysis was also the same that GL account is set as mandatory.. but sadly i can't change it ryt now
so i need to know if this setting of 100% and 0% will work ?
can u tell me what is the meaning of the No column when i press f1 on it it says Distribution Rule Number .. does this define a hierarchy ?
if it is defining a hierarchy then it should consider cost center first and settle 100% in it .. ryt ?
Thanks
Rabiee

ORDER SETTLEMENT PROBLEM

Hi all,
i settled a production order let say 'X' through t code ko88 (this order is created by t code iw31) now again when i am tring to settle the same order throgh t code it is allowing me to settle though it is already settled 100% in production server
But in development server it is giving me message that 'Order is settled'.
Please tell me why system is allowing me in production to settle the same order?
waiting for response

Hi Sandeep,
When you said that the Order was created using the t code IW31, I understand that it is a Maintenance Order. Maintenance Orders are settled collectively using t code KO8G. Make sure that when you are saying, the Order was settled when you exectued CO88, what is the balance on that Order? was it Zero? I doubt that.
I feel, when you executed CO88, that Maintenance Order might not got Settled. So, when you are trying to settle using KO88 (single order processing), it is settling.
Check once again and revert back...
Srikanth Munnaluri

Sales order settlement Problem with Internal Order

HI Dear Friends,
How are you, I am fine.
We have 1 Process here Related with SD & FI/CO
for 1 process we have treat as a small Project,
the process is we have make 1st Contract and create Internal order and assign Internal order to Contract
then Create Sales Release Order and assing Internal Order in Settlement Rule in Sales order.
then we create billing ref to Contract and then we did PGI.
1) at billing time the Internal Order is Updatting
2) at PGI time internal Order is not updating - what is the right process - the internal; Order will be updating or not
then we have to do Sales order Settlement thtough Trasaction code VA88
what will happned at this level pleas be advicsed becos when i do this it is giving messges not is toi be settled.
Friends I did all exercise complete except Settlement trough T-Code VA88.
When I am going to do this settlement VA88 it is giving messages there is nothing to be settle.
What I have to do please be advised.
I did all these activities:
1)     Create sales Contract
2)     Create Internal Order
3)     Assign Internal Order to sales Contract
4)     Crate Release Sales Order
5)     Assign Internal Order to Release Sales Order
6)     Delivery & PGI
7)     Billing         (at billing time the internal Order should be Updates (pls advise it should be or not)
8)     Last is Settlement VA88 u2013 this time it is giving Error.
When I settle the Sales order to internal order what will happens. Which value will update.
Please reply me frds,
Thanks,
Srem.

hello Lakshmipathi,
Thanks a lot for your reply.
I tried to change the requierement class in order to put one with special stock E as you explained, but i still have my weird schedule line. When i put the item in the order it is 0 stock for today, but stock find in 12 days either if there is stock or no(unrestricted stock i mean).
If i change the RDD in more than 12 days the stock is available for the date requested.
If you have an idea of what could be wrong because on my case i want the schedule line to be at 0 while the sales order reservation has not been processed (via MB1B/412/E) and once the stock movement is done the schedule line has to be find.
I dont know if im clear enought..
To be more clear, i want the schedule line based on the "sales order stock" and not on the "unrestricted stock".
thanks for your help!
Guillaume

WIP Credit Balance - Internal Capital Order Settlement Problem - KO88

Hi Experts,
I am new to SAP and currently undergoing my first implementation. We are trying to settle as many internal capital orders before conversion, but since I am new I am learning the AUC process slowly.
I am trying to settle assets to a capital work order and receiving the [maintain the settlement rule of the sender]. How can I fix this? If you can provide explanation as to the process it would be greatly appreciated.

hello,
Check your settlement rule? there must be a period maintained and this does not follow within that period
extend the period of settlement rule either greater than validity period of settlement rule.
Thanks
Hrusikesh

ERS Settlement Problem for movment type 102

Hi All,
There is an scheduling agreement created with ERS check mark. When I do the goods receipt in MB01 against 101 movement type, MRRL is triggering for the goods movement. When I reverse the goods movement in MB01 against 102 movement type, MRRL is not triggering for the few goods reversal. The settings are correct because in few cases it is settling properly.
Please let me know what are settings will affect the ERS reversal.
Appreciate your help!!!
Regards,
Raja

Raja,
There is nothing special you need to do in order to make ERS work with reversals. What makes you think ERS is not paying attention to the reversals?   Here are a few things to consider:
-   Is it possible that the ERS check was not present on the line items when the reversal was done?
-   Go to the EKRS table to see if the reversals are present in the table.   The entry could be slightly different depending on when the 102 was done and by what transaction.    If the 102 was done after the 101 was settled and done with MB01 then it'll be it's own movement.   However if it was done via MBST or MBRL - it may appear to be the 101 entry when in fact it is the reversal.
If there is no entry in the EKRS table that indicates the ERS flag was not checked when the reversal was done. Or the reversal has already been settled.
Regards,
Sandra

Settlement problem in Claim

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for