Sharing accounts across 2 plan types  - Planning 9.3.1

This is my first attempt to share accounts across 2 plan types and I am not getting expected results. In the setup, account 1234 was assigned to both Plan A and plan B with the "source plan type" as Plan B. When I create a form for Plan B, everything looks good and I can input data into account 1234. Then I created a similar form for Plan A using the same account. With all other dimensions being the same, I expect that I would see the data input for Plan B, account 1234 in the Plan A form as a read only field.
Are my expectations incorrect? If so, then I don't understand the benefit of sharing accounts across multiple plan types.
Any insight is greatly appreciated.

One benefit would be how you use the same data in one plan type against the other. A simple example:
Let's say in your example Plan B represents Revenue and Plan A represents Expense - one way some people design Planning applications. Let's also say that your company calculates expense as a percent of revenue.
The revenue group enters revenue figures into acct 1234 into the Plan B form.
When the expense group pulls up the Plan A form, which also shows acct 1234 (but as read-only), they can now calculate against it. So an expense user can enter % values into some other acct in Plan A, "Exp % Rev", and have it calculate against the read-only acct 1234 being x-ref'ed from Plan B.
Plan B Form:
___________Jan__Feb
"acct 1234"_100__100 (input)
Plan A Form:
____________Jan___Feb
"acct 1234"___100__100 (read-only)
"Exp % Rev"__5%___5% (input)
"Rev Exp"_____5____5 (calculated)
The benefit here is that no data movement or copy is necessary between plan types for this to work, assuming the x-ref is dynamically calculated. Users can see data in both places.
This is just a simple example, however, and may not make sense in all situations.
Hope that helps!
-O

Similar Messages

  • Ability to restrict access to different Plan Types in Planning 11.1.2 ?

    Hi, we're running Planning/EPM version 11.1.2, with DRM and EPMA.
    We're creating a new Plan Type (Plan 2) within the Planning app, and if possible I'd like to restrict access to this 2nd plan type to only a small group of users. This 2nd plan type would be for additional what-if testing and we don't want their work to interfere with the main cube in Plan 1. Is it possible to use security provisioning or another technique so I can restrict who can have access to Plan 2?
    Also if I can do this, is it also possible to have Planning data forms that are only visible to Plan 2 and it's users?
    Thanks in advance.

    You can restrict forms easily using groups and/or direct provisioning.
    Typically you will always have security on your scenario dimension; I suggest using scenario or version security to restrict access to your data.
    Regards,
    John A. Booth
    http://www.metavero.com

  • How to create dynamic calc account in multi-plan type application

    Hi expert,
    I have a planning application with 3 plan types.
    I created a calculation script which fixed on accounts in plan type 1 only and the calculation suppose to calculate a "dynamiccalc" account with a member formula attached. Everytime I run the script, it takes very long time and I found there are sessions at the back of essbase with "Process local xref/xwrite request" request to other plan types.
    It does not has this kind of session if I change the account to "store".
    Would like to check, is it possible to create a dynamic calc account to calculate for only 1 plan type in a multi-plan type application? Is there any special setting that I need to do to enable this? I already selected source plan type as Plan type 1 for my dynamic calc account. Please help!
    Many thanks!!
    My HP application is on version 11.1.2.1.

    Hi Jake,
    Thanks for pointing out the check box. Overlooked it and the checkbox was not unchecked, even I only wanted the account to exist in 1 of the plan type.
    However, after I unchecked and refresh now, when I run the calc script, it still trigger process at the back to the other 2 plan types with "Process local xref/xwrite request" request. What else could I have missed?
    I already added the "HSP_Nolink" UDA to all accounts in plan type 2 and plan type 3 and confirmed that there's no account with "Xref" member formula, I really don't know why it is trying to process local xref request. Can anyone help??
    Many thanks!!!

  • Difference between Account members of 2 different plan types

    Can we find out difference between members of Account dimensions having source as 2 different plan types. One of the plan type has 2 extra dimensions also.

    You should be able to do this as long as one of the accounts is ALSO present in the plan type that the other account is stored in. So probably Acc.member2
    could be set to have a "Source plan Type" of plan 2, but also be selected to appear in plan 1 when you edit the Acc.member2 account in the Planning web application. Planning would enable the account to appear in plan 1 via an XREF on the account member definition in Essbase) .
    Then in plan 1 you would set up a third account which would calculate the difference between the 2.
    You would be able to analyse the variance only by the dimensions in plan 1 (i.e. D1, 2, 3, & 4: those dimensions common to both plan types)
    Hope this helps
    Edited by: Xansaman on Nov 25, 2010 4:26 PM

  • Multiple plan types

    is multiple plan types required multiple currencies and is currencies rate must kept in separate database ? and can data be shared across the organization dimension in multiple plan types ?

    is the security is applied to the entity dimension but can differ for users for account sales and expenses ?
    and is sales are planned by product and channel , and salary expenses are planned by position?

  • Workflow - Multiple Plan types

    How does Workflow work when there is more than one Plan Type. As the Planning Unit is made of an Entity, Scenario and Version, how does it work when the data set that needs to move along the Approval flow is across Plan Types ?

    Thanks Jake ! So, as long as the Entity, Scenario and Version that are part of given Planning Unit are shared across Plan Types, ownership is passed and security is updated in relevant plan types ?
    Also on a related note, is there an overlap of Security and Workflow ? In other words, Security still remains the way it was defined irrespective of Workflow, right ?
    Edited by: Hyper99 on Apr 5, 2012 8:24 AM

  • Plan Types

    I have some Accounts in common across Plan Types...
    Do I need to manually set the XREF to share data?
    Thanks,
    Jz

    Planning will create the XREF formulas automatically assuming:
    1) You have the account member properties set such that the account exists in both Plan Types.
    2) You have the account member properties set with the correct Source Plan Type.
    I typically find that the XREF's are painfully slow, and instead opt for an export/import process.
    Hope this helps,
    - Jake

  • Deselecting a Member from a Plan Type

    All,
    I have a Geography dimension that is shared by the Income Statement and the Work Force cube. However, not all hierarchies and members need to be shared by both (for example Intercompany GEOs).  In Planning,in the Geography dimension properties, both Income Statement and Work Force cube plan types are selected.  But when I go to the Member property in the Geography dimension to deselect a member let say from the Work Force cube, the check box is grayed out and cannot be unchecked.  How can I make deselect a member from other plan types when the check boxes are grayed out? 
    Thank you,

    This issue was really bothering me so I looked at and compared all dimensions in both the production and development environment and noticed the following:
    The dimensions that allowed the changes in the individual members overriding the plan type selections are from the Country and Account dimension types
    All other dimensions including the Period dimension type did not allow changes
    Any thoughts on why this the case?
    Thank you,

  • New feature aso plan type under planning V11.1.2.3

    HI all,
    I notice than there new feature under planning.
    the ability to create ASO plan type under planning.
    but in documentation i don't understand if this part is not available under planning licence .
    is this new feature involde to purchase new licence on essbase and in this case we have application user wich licence is needed (cpu) ?
    can some one help?
    on URL Introduction - Oracle EPM System 11.1.2.3 Documentation Library
    extract of
    Oracle Hyperion Planning New Features
    HTML
    Aggregate Storage Option Support
    Administrators can now add an aggregate storage option (ASO) database to a Planning application using Planning application administration.
    Administrators can create an ASO plan type during application creation, or they can add a new plan type using the new plan type editor. See Plan Type Editor. Write back to ASO cubes within Planning is supported.
    Note:
    To use ASO databases in Planning, you must have the required license.
    on doc I
    Oracle Enterprise Performance Management System Licensing Guide
    PDF
    Essbase Plus cannot be used to create Essbase cubes that do not
    contain data used by the Hyperion Planning Plus application.
    l The Aggregate Storage Option component of Essbase Plus may not
    be used.

    You also need the Essbase license to be able to use that functinality, probably best discussing with your Oracle account manager for the full details.
    Cheers
    John
    http://john-goodwin.blogspot.com/

  • Can a Financial Plan Type be attached to more than one Project Template

    We are working on Project Accounting through Self Service pages. For doing the Cost Budget we have created a Financial Plan Type. We attached it to a Time & Material Project. But later when we tried attaching it one more template, a Turnkey Template, it does not give us the Cost Budget-Financial Plan type in the drop down box.
    Hence, wanted to know whether we can attach a Financial Plan Type to more than one Project Template??? If yes, then why didnt we get the option in the drop down box?
    Chirag..

    Since you are not using Company code as the branch, and are using Profit centre as the branch, I dont think its right for you to set a default profit centre for any GL account in the Chart of Account for that company.
    all the SAP user in the company will be using the same company code to post, and thus, will be using exactly the same inventory account, if you set a default profit centre there, no point rite? You will need to implement a procedure to ask all the user to manually assign the profit centre during posting. Just like how we normally ask user to specify the company code before posting.
    The authorisation should be set by profit centre as well. hope this helps. Thanks.

  • Sequences in Palnning with mutiple Plan types

    Running on Planning 9.3.1, and having the Load Balancing structure.
    Trying to create a Sequence should run the Business rules, as each HBR should run on different Plan types. Surley I need to Merge the variables of RTPs. Is there any work around way. Can anybody share their experince on this if you already come across of this scenario.
    Edited by: 798780 on Sep 12, 2011 9:04 AM

    Thansk Abhishek,
    Yes, that is the issue. If we hide only the databases and remain RTPs we need to enter multiple times even though they are similar ones. And also, cannot compromise the Load Balancing as we cannot give mutiple locations. I am not sure if we can have any work around.

  • Cost element/activity type planning upload

    Hi,
    When doing the cost element/activity type planning upload via KP06, can I assign only one characteristic in the element definition level?   Because I want to put in the excel upload layout  the cost elements, cost centers and activity types.  But ECC 6.0 is allowing only one characteristic in the element definition level.  Has anyone encountered this problem?
    Thanks and best regards,
    Thess

    Hello,
    This is controlled by planning are in your planning profile. You need to use "Cost ctrs: Cost element/activity inputs" planning area for this purpose.
    Hope you are conversant with Integrated excel upload.
    To do integrated excel upload of cost center plan data.
    IMG ==> Controlling ==> Cost Center Accounting ==> Planning ==> Manual Planning User Defined Layouts - Create your own layout or copy from standard layout and change it.
    IMG ==> Controlling ==> Cost Center Accounting ==> Planning ==> Define User Defined Planner Profiles
    Copy the SAPALL to ZSAPALL. You cannot change SAPALL as it is standard.
    In ZSAPALL planner profile, select proper planning area and enter your layout.
    Tick Integrate Excel.
    Once the popup for KP06 comes, you need enter the data and save it. It would generate the file name.
    With the same file name you need upload the plan data by using KP06.
    In KP06
    Extras ==> Excel Planning ==> Upload
    Select the file as prepared in accordance with format at the time of generating the file name.
    Hope this solves your problem.
    Please let me know if you need futher help.
    Regards,
    Ravi

  • Consideration for no. of Plan types in HP

    Hi Expert,
    Would like to inquire if there's any rules or guidelines to decide under what circumstances, we should structure separate plan types in an HP application?
    I understand a typical rule would be if separate dimensions are needed for different set of data, then may need separate plan types, but want to further explore the following situations:
    Situation 1:
    Say for 1 set of data (say data set A), we need to have dimension 1, 2
    For another set of date (i.e. data set B), we need dimension 3
    For both data set, there are 5 other common dimensions that are needed by both
    we are face with the option of either setup only 1 plan type, and setup members of dimension 1 & 3 into the same dimension, and webform to control for data set A, select dimension 1 tree, and data set B, select dimension 3.
    Or we setup 2 plan types.
    Want to check what would be the factors that we need to consider whether to separate the plan type or not?
    Situation 2:
    We have 2 groups of data, both groups require the same sets of dimension. But we anticipate the volumn of both groups would be quite large and although their dimensionality is the same, but the 2 groups of data are independent from each other.
    We wonder if we should split them into 2 plan types, to avoid any performance issues, when more and more data are entered?
    Say we have about 11/12 dimensions, in which the account dimension (which is dense), have about 500-700 for each group, then 4-5 dimensions will have about 500 - 1000 members each, and want to store about 5-7 years of data, in about 20 scenarios/versions combination. Is this large enough to justify / better to have separate plan types?
    Want to know, what would be the limit / threshold of no. of dimensions / members to decide whether to have 1 or multiple plan types? or what other considerations?
    Thanks in advance!

    Hi,
    I have took the below content from OTN. Please understood your requirement properly, based on that defined the Plan types.
    A few points of clarification:
    I have seen a fair number of clients use multiple plan types when it was probably not necessary. For example, I had one client create three plan types that were identical, with the exception of the Entity dimension. They were trying to achieve some type of workflow/approvals by passing data from one plan type to another . . . all because they didn't know about Hyperion Planning's Approvals features. We cosolidated their app down to a single plan type and saved them a lot of maintenance and aggravation.
    Typically, you break an app into multiple plan types due to one of two reasons:
    1) You have significantly different data granularity between the two databases.
    2) You have a materially different subject area between the two databases.
    A good example of point #1 is workforce planning. WFP includes granular employee level data, while your typical P&L cube does not. If you already have a P&L type cube, and you want employee level detail, it makes sense to create a separate plan type.
    Another example of point #1 might be Actuals data vs Plan data. I've had clients that wanted to analyze their Actuals data down to very granular GL accounts, however they planned at a much higher level in the account structure. When running Planning business rules, do you want your Essbase blocks dragging around all of those granular GL accounts that you'll never use as part of a Plan? No. So it makes sense to break it out into a different plan type.
    An example for #2 might be P&L data vs. Balance Sheet data. While many people can and do put these accounts all into one plan type, it can sometimes be more efficient to break them out. (Thus reducing the overall block size of each database.)
    One final point . . . you CAN add Workforce and CapEx to your existing plan types after they have been created/deployed. However adding additional plan types (other than Workforce or Capex) would require you to recreate the app.
    Hope the above examples helps you to understand the concept and define your plan types...
    Thanks

  • Dependent Certification - Plan Type

    Hi,
    Currently we are setting up the Dependent Certification in the Program Enrollment Requirements -> Dependent Coverage -> Plan Type -> Life Event Change..
    I am determining the certification requirement using fast formula (Dependent Certification Required)
    If we have 4 plan types and 2 certifications (ssn + birth certificate), the certification requirement records will be created for 4 plan types.
    For example two dependent will be having 16 certification records.
    I guess this will be a time consuming process to certify each dependent.
    Will it cause any problem in the enrollment if we received the certifications for one plan type, no need to create certifications for other plan types by using fast formula or any workaround to avoid this?
    Did someone come across this situation?
    Thanks
    Arun

    user9228608 wrote:
    Hi,
    I just want to know the certification plan which make me disturb all the time,Information is authoratively available at http://certification.oracle.com and I suggest you take time to study it carefully. I see below you are doing that already which is good.
    i have a plan to give paper of 1Z0-144-ENU. When i view this paper on oracle web page it gives information not need training to paper but my friends and Colleague is saying that oracle need training to this paper kindly advice me. Training required or not...??The Certification associated with 1z0-144 (Oracle PL/SQL Developer Certified Associate) does not require any training. You only have to pass 1z0-144 and 1z0-051 (or 1z0-007 or 1z0-047).
    http://education.oracle.com/pls/web_prod-plq-dad/db_pages.getpage?page_id=458&get_params=p_track_id:PLSQL
    >
    >
    >
    I have clear my essential paper need to plan 1Z0-548-ENU (Oracle E-Business Suite R12 Human Capital Management Essentials) either training required or not...??
    Page: http://education.oracle.com/pls/web_prod-plq-dad/db_pages.getpage?page_id=458&get_params=p_track_id:EBSR12HCM indicates the Oracle E-Business Suite R12 Human Capital Management Certified Implementation Specialist only requires pass of 1z0-548, training is not mandatory
    I have clear my sql paper 1Z0-007 need to plan paper 1Z0-144-EN (Oracle Database 11g: Program with PL/SQL) either training required or not ....??
    See above.
    >
    Please advice.
    ThanksIn all cases above training appears not to be currently required ( however Oracle do seem to suggest it will help)

  • Integrating Financial Plan types from Primavera to OP

    Hi All,
    We have the requirement of sending 3 financial plan types ( budget class financial plan) from Primavera to OP. And existing PIP functionality only supports the integration of a single financial plan types. How to go ahead on customising to send these 3 financial plan types using the functionality supplied by the PIP
    from Primavera to OP. Eg: One financial type is sent across from Primavera to OP when a project is created.
    At the end of each financial period, another financial plan needs to be sent from Primavera to Oracle Projects, which is effectively part of a forecast i.e. cost of work done to date.
    Any pointers/ guidance on how to go about the above?
    Thanks in advance,
    Sudha

    Sudha,
    You may try posting this query in Oracle Projects forum under EBusiness Suite. Dean Herback may be able to help you out.
    ~Sachin

Maybe you are looking for