SRM- Pucchase Order and Contract (backend) Tolerance failures

Using SRM 7 Extended classic scenario with ECC 6.0. Tolerances have been set up in ECC and SRM.
The Contract is raised in the backend and replicated into SRM.
In SRM, both PPOMA and Vendor groups have been assigned the correct TOG.
Raising a Shopping Cart that exceeds the Contract Target value, but it within the Tolerance, works fine. However, once the Shopping Cart is approved, the back end PO creation fails, leaving the SC status as Saved. A review of SLG1 says that the PO exceeded the Contract value and displays errors for both Quantity and Target Value.
Any ideas on where to investigate appreciated.
Regards

S0001334469 wrote:>
> Muthu
>
> If I create a PO in the backend then it works within my defined tolerances. When I create a PO via SRM Shop Cart, teh shopping cart is ok but when it gets approved, the SRM PI is created but the backend PO is NOT created - and the SC status is set to Saved in the Follow On Documents for the Purchase Order. Seems that tolerances are being ignored.
>
> 'TOG' is the Tolerance Group - needs to be assigned to Vendor group and HR Org Structure (PPOMA) in SRM
>
> Gerry.
Hi Gerry
give more precise data about TOG you given in org structure
so you will get more suggestions from other people. it is power of SDN
created PO successfully in ECC via ECC request
no PO created successfully in ECC via SRM request
give more data on sc /pr /contract data ( quantity or value contract) for better understanding
Muthu
I'm having similar problems btu with repsect to SRM PO's against Contracts raised in the backend (replicated into SRM)
Our infrastructure -s SRM 7 Extended Classis Scenario and ECC 6.
I have tolerances setup in ECC and SRM and the TOG has been assigned in SRM Vendor Groups and in the HR Org Structure (PPOMA).
Tolerance are 5% up to $100.00
If I raise a Contract in ECC, and a PO (MM) in ECC, then the PO will work if I stay within the allowed tolerances.
When I raise a PO in SRM, the Shopping Cart is processed OK, but when the SC is approved, the backend PO is not created.
In the Shopping cart in Related Documents for document Purchase Order, the Satus is set to Saved. A review of SLG1 indicates error due to exceeding the quantity and the Target value.
Why are tolerances not being taken into consideration? How do I get this to work?
Gerry

Similar Messages

SRM purchase order and contract item overview

Hi.
Is it possibles to change the PO and Contract item overview screens as we have a specific need to include one additional column (delivery dates)?As an example, for a SRM PO , we want to include a new free text field we have defined?
Thank you. Vij

You say that
1. you have created the contract with overall service limits.
2. you now referred this contract and created the PO
PO created (ME21N) and Contract details and overall limits entered. Service items adopted from the contract and the 'No Limit' box checked for individual services. All service quantities maintained as 1 no, rates copied from contract.
Please remove the No limit check and keep only the value in contract limits. The system would then force you to enter the additional value in unplanned services during SES creation. The same applies when you are using Other Limits (Mentioned limit in other Limits tab in PO creation)
If it does not work, check message settings for message # SE 347, 364, 365 & 366.
If it still does not work, please open an OSS message to SAP.
Thanks & regards
AHP

Purchase Order and Contract - controlling overall value

Our process has the following steps - The total amount in the order to the vendor is fixed. Indivdual services have rates fixed, but quantities are not fixed ie, the quantity can vary from 0 to any upper number subject to the overall value of the order. I tried the following:
Created a contract (ME31K) with the services and rates entered (quantity kept as 1). Overall value entered as the contract limit. PO created (ME21N) and Contract details and overall limits entered. Service items adopted from the contract and the 'No Limit' box checked for individual services. All service quantities maintained as 1 no, rates copied from contract.
With this my expectation was that the system will allow multuiple service entry sheets for each of the services upto the limit specified by the contract. However the system allowed Service Entry for value exceeding the overall limit of the contract.
What other configuration needs to be done to make sure that beyond the overall value limit, system does not allow service entry.
Thanks in advance for your help
Deepak

You say that
1. you have created the contract with overall service limits.
2. you now referred this contract and created the PO
PO created (ME21N) and Contract details and overall limits entered. Service items adopted from the contract and the 'No Limit' box checked for individual services. All service quantities maintained as 1 no, rates copied from contract.
Please remove the No limit check and keep only the value in contract limits. The system would then force you to enter the additional value in unplanned services during SES creation. The same applies when you are using Other Limits (Mentioned limit in other Limits tab in PO creation)
If it does not work, check message settings for message # SE 347, 364, 365 & 366.
If it still does not work, please open an OSS message to SAP.
Thanks & regards
AHP

Want to pass STRS2 field into sales order and contract.

Hi Friends.
I am creating Sales order using function module IDOC_INPUT_ORDERS and Contract using SD_SALESDOCUMENT_CREATE.
Now I want to pass STRS2(House number field into Sales Order/Contract). In IDOC I tried to pass E1EDKA1-STRS2, but its not coming into Sales order output.But SD_SALESDOCUMENT_CREATE dont have an option to pass the field value.
So in that case how can I achieve the desired functionality, Is there any user exit or let me know the suitable method to achieve the functionality.
Thanks
Gowrishankar

Yes I tried that also.I passed the value from program to user exit MV45AFZZ and updated the structure XVBADR in USEREXIT_SAVE_DOCUMENT_PREPARE, but its not getting reflected in Sales Order/Contract.
Anyone have suggestion..plz let me know.
Thanks
Gowrishankar

Need table name where SRM stores POs and Contracts

I need SRM tables where data for PO and Contract is stored (similar to EKPO, EKKN etc.).
We will be using SRM 7/

Hi,
As Rahul said you can get all the table names in BBP_PD.
Here you have the main tables:
http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/download/attachments/44272/Main%20SRM%20Tables.jpg
Regards,

SRM Service Orders and Entry sheets,

Hi Friends,
Is SRM service orders able to provide the u2018price changeu2019 field? In the R/3 equivalent Service Order entered with item category Service, the u2018price changeu2019 field is available (table ESLL, field PRS_CHG) and we have a business requirement to have this available when we enter SRM Order Service confirmation sheets in R/3. If a service sheet is created from a SRM PO with item category service, u2018price changeu2019 is greyed out. If a service sheet is created from a service PO entered directly in R/3 the u2018price changeu2019 field is not greyed out for input and can be changed. Please can somebody explain how we can make this field available.
Previous experiences with using functionality this would be highly welcome.
Thank you. Steven

Hi,
You can assign the service master records administered in your company to different groups, according to their usage. Such a group is described by the service category.
To characterize the service categories in more detail, the latter are assigned an organization status. The organization status indicates the areas in which service master records are used.
For example, units of your company may use services provided internally by other units of the company, or procure services externally (from other companies). Your company may also provide services for others.
AS01: If you select this the service master data is at basic data level. That means basic data about the service will be depicted here.
AS02: Service master stored at basic and CO level. To maintain the information at CO level this organizational status is required.
AS03: Service master stored at basic plus purchasing level. For procurement purpose(MM), THIS LEVEL is useful.
Create a po with service activity number in me21n with account assignment category K & and item category D.
For the SES, the creation date would still be same. Only field ESSR-BUDAT (posting date) would get changed.
That shouldn't be a problem, since you would know anyway when the SES was created from ESSR-ERDAT, the SES creation date.
Also the last change date would also be correctly updated.
You have another field Doc Date ESSR-BLDAT which records the date the SES was posted
Thank's
Raj

Buyer of shopping cart, purchase order and contract

Hi
I wanted to ask about buyers. Are buyers usually a purchasing group/organisation? I am not sure if my thinking is right but wouldn't a buyer of a shopping cart and purchase order be the same. And a buyer of a contract would or can be different to the shopping cart because a contract is a source of supply and is probably linked to many purchasing groups/organizations.
Is this reasoning right? Buyers are different to approvers too isn't it? Please could someone explain this to me?
Kind regards

Hi Deepa,
Are buyers usually a purchasing group/organisation?
Ideally each buyer should ahve a unique purchasing group. In thsi case we can say that each buyer is a purchasing group. However, in some companies, its a possiblity of sharing a purchasing group. In that case multiple buyer users will be assigned to purchasing groups in the SRM organizational structure.
buyer of a shopping cart and purchase order be the same.
Normally, if a PO is created w.r.t. SC, the purchasing group is copied. So its the same. However we can change the purchasing groups in sourcing cockpit using workload reassignment option or direcly in the PO/contract document.
So we can say that its necessary to have PO/contract purchasing group same as that in SC.
Regards,
Prashant
Do reward points for helpful answers

Puchase order and contract.

Hi ´gurús,
                 I would like to know if it is possible to lock the field "Net price" of the purchase order when this document refers to a contract.
The user should not modify this price when the PO refers to a purchase order.
Its possible trough customizing? Security?
Thanks in advance for the help
Regards
Enzo

Hi,
This is not possible for PO's with reference to a particular document etc.
However, you can use "Field selection key : item category/document category" for individual document categories.
A   for RFQs
B   for purchase requisitions
F   for purchase orders
K   for contracts
L   for scheduling agreements
Field selection key: purchasing document type
The field selection key that you have assigned to the document type for the purchasing document. For example, field selection key UBF is assigned to document type UB, which is used for stock transfer orders (within a company code). In this key, the fields Price and Price unit are suppressed.
You can try using BAdi/Enhancement in your case.
Regards,
Srilatha.

A question about Droid pre-order and contract status

Hi,
I preorded the droid from best buy the first day preorders were available. The person who handled my order didn't mention problems with my current contract status. My 2yr contract isn't up till 4/2010, and from reading here, it seems that best buy doesn't do the 1yr early upgrades.
So when I go down to best buy on friday to attempt to pick up my phone what are gonna be my options?
$599 retail price, or nothing? And so, will they refund my $50?
Would they do the 1yr and $369 price, if they consider I put in over one year on my current contract and consider it a $1yr? (I read someone say this would be an option)
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Who does best buy sell phones to if they don't offer upgrades? Just new customers and people with expired accounts?
Can someone explain this post to me? http://www.howardforums.com/showpost.php?p=13177342&postcount=32
According to the guy that posted that, he was orginally denied, like has been said here. but then the looked it up and told him they'd honor the 1yr early upgrade.
To me, it just doesn't make much sense to not honor what verizon does.. cause you'd be losing lots of business. Anyone who is up for NE2, and denied honoring it by BB will just go to the verizon store, or order it online via verizons website. Anyone 1 year into their 2 year contract who is denied the 1yr early upgrade that verizon offers, and who doesn't care much about waiting for their $100-$50 NE2 discount will again be forced to buy elsewhere cause BB turns them away.
I'm not trying to make threats that BB needs to change. Just trying to draw attention to something that makes no sense to lots of customers. And would like someone to actually look into this again, since it seems to vary from store to store, clerk to clerk.

Blanket POs as a framework order and contracts

Hello,
In 6.0, could some tell me the difference between using a framework order (in ME21N ) and invoice planning to create a blanket PO the same thing as using a contract...?

Framework order is also known as Blanket PO.....which we use for the procurement of Low value Material with Long term planning....It is used as Mini Contract....
For making Blanket PO....you have to choose Order type: FO in ME21N....with Item category "B"(Limit)
For creating Blanket PO... You need not have to maintain material master.....Maintaining Acc.assignment Category in PO is mandatory....also you have to maintain Validity Period in Blanket PO...
As per SAP Best Practice.....for Blanket PO, GR is not possible.....you can directly post multiple Invoices for One Blanket PO....The validity and total Value of these Invoices for Blanket PO during LIV can be controled by tollerance keys LA and LD.

Worklfow driven Approvals for Inquiry/Quoatation, Sales Order and Contract,

Hello,
What scenarios/ processes within SAP SD are supported by standard SAP for auto workflow driven approval.
We need workflow driven approvals for-
Customr Inquiry/ Quotation,
Sales Order,
Contract
and Credit Approval.
Can we do these workflow scenarious in SAP? Are they supported by std SAP.
Thanks.

Hi,
I would suggest you to check the standard template in SAP workflow also.
To check the standard template, goto transaction SWDD, and search by using structure seach, you will find the standard templatea under sales and distribution area.
Regarding to your requiements , you need to create the new object by extend from the standard object BUS2032 by using transaction SWO1.
[Workflow Tutorial|http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/weblogs;jsessionid=(J2EE3417100)ID1399619950DB01372531338821066946End?blog=/pub/wlg/7288]
Best regards,

COPA and service orders and contracts

We have service order billings using orders created by customer service. When the service order is billed, the order numberAUFNR) is included on the billing document and thus GL entry. These do not post to CO-PA until the service order is settled. Some of the characteristic data is lost in this posting. How can I make these go to CO-PA as the actual postings and the service order as statistical.

Vinay,
I dont think you need any Middleware adaptor objects for CRM Request download .
You need to create a request in CRM using R3AR2 . Here you need to provide the R/3 table name and field name to download the service document along with Document ID
You can monitor your request download in txn R3AR4.
But as MCG rightly told , you should have done all requried customized settigns before downloading service documents .
Regards
Dinesh

Perfomance of sales order and Contract

Dear All.
While executing standard TCode it vao2,va03,va42,va43 it is taking long time to Load.there are more than 1000 line items in contract.even after geach input like scrolling the table control it is taking more time to load ,Please Suggest me Soloution.
Thanks in advance.
Regards
Pranesh

Praneshom wrote:
Dear All.
>
> While executing standard TCode it vao2,va03,va42,va43 it is taking long time to Load.there are more than 1000 line items in contract.even after geach input like scrolling the table control it is taking more time to load ,Please Suggest me Soloution.
> Thanks in advance.
>
>
>
> Regards
> Pranesh
Hello Pranesh,
the problem with large number of items in SD documents is well known, but I don't think there is an ultimate solution for it.
General advise - avoid having so many items in your sales documents.
As a rule of thumb for the processing of an SD document you should count around 500 ms for the header and 100 ms for each item.
If you process contracts with 1000 items, the response time of over 1 minute during opening or saving is more or less normal. Do not expect wonders from the system.
Regards,
Yuri

Purchasing Document Type (Purchase Order and Contract)

Dear all;
I have created two different PO document type in development Server .I have transferd sandbox for further testing ,There i hve change the number range interval status to "0" after that I have created a PO with new document type in the sand box ,it is working fine but after save ,system showing some error msgs. as Below
Express document "Update was terminated" received from author "JOYDEEP"
What may be the problem.kindly suggest .
Thanking you;
Regards;
Joydeep Mukherjee

This update termination may be due to some configuration or may be due to some development which is resulting in the dump. Go to SBWP - your SAP inbox, there you will see a mail, open that mail to see the details for the reason for this update termination.

SRM 7.0 Central Contract- Distribution to backend failure

Hello experts,
We are implementing SRM 7.0 Central contracts scenario with PI.
The Contracts get created and Released but the problem is that the Distribution to backend fails. The Status in BBP_PD shows 'Distribution Incorrect' and the RZ20 gives an error 'Backend data cannot be read'.
We checked all the configuration settings (including the PI settings) and everything seems to be in order.
Would appreciate if someone could throw some light on the potential cause of the problem.
Thanks
Raman.

Message must have created . check all SRM outbound transactions .but PI could not catch them.
Note 1284369 - User attributes check in Contract distribution via services - what is your SP level in SRM 700.
The sap stratergy in earlier version
table in ECC BBPD_CTR_IDOCREF with message 019-This will result in setting the GOA status to 'Distribution Incorrect'.
so SAP might have tried the same way in CCTR as well, Once message are created and this message number like IDOC number updated in ECC table for the further refrence .so like wise SRM trying to communicate the same to ECC but it would have failed.
do you remeber when GOA idoc fails this table we will have reference number and reprocessing idoc.
like any reference of your input must register in one ECC table but there may have this table or some other reference table.
/SAPSRM/CL_CH_SOA_MAP_CTR_OUT CLASS DO SOME trick and see what is happening here
Muthu

SRM- Pucchase Order and Contract (backend) Tolerance failures

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for