Standalone Scenario -  Company Code, Cost center table

Hi,
   Can any one please let me know the company code, cost center table used in standalone scenario.
Regards,
SAP Guy.

Hi,
The account assignment, Product category and Logical system combination is maintained in SPRO.
SPRO > IMG > SRM > SRM Server > Cross Application Basic settings > Account Assignment
There are three settings which you maintain there :
1. Account assignment categories
2. Define G/L account for product category , Logical system and Account assignment category
3. Maintain local accounting data.
These are the three settings which you maintain for account assignment determination.
Hope this makes you more clear and helps in resolving your issue. Clarifications are welcome.
Award points for helpful answers.
Rgds,
Teja

Similar Messages

  • Cross company code cost center allocation

    Hello experts,
    I would like to know if cross company code cost center allocations is possible or not ?
    Please let me know.
    Newcom

    hi its possiable,
    can u give a senario, i will explain to u.
    for ex:
    com code1  having    dept x
    com code 2 also have a possiablities to have same c ctr dept x
    thanqu

  • Authorization issue with Company code/ Cost center combination

    Hi,
    I am currently trying to restrict user access by company code and cost center combination.
    We have roles defined for each user and I am trying to use the standard authorization object A_S_KOSTL in this role . It seems that since it is not a 'maintianed' object no activity can be assigned to this autorization object.
    currently the values are :
    company Code : 1110 , 1112, 1114
    Cost Center : *
    i am getting sy-subrc as 0 even when i test for company code : 1110 for a user with the above role.
    My code is :
    AUTHORITY-CHECK OBJECT 'A_S_KOSTL'
        ID 'BUKRS' FIELD '1110'.
    F sy-subrc EQ 0.
      AUTHORITY-CHECK OBJECT 'A_S_KOSTL'
      ID 'KOSTL' FIELD '*' .
      IF sy-subrc EQ 0.
        MESSAGE 'Success with KOSTL also' TYPE 'S'.
      ELSE.
          MESSAGE 'Success with BUKRS only' TYPE 'S'.
      ENDIF.
    ELSE.
          MESSAGE 'Failure' TYPE 'S'.
    ENDIF .
    I get a subrc NE 0 for the KOSTL part. The test passes for BUKRS.
    Please advise on how to proceed.
    Thanks and Regards
    Soumya

    Okay, I misread the "NE". Sorry.
    Have you done a syntax check on it?
    Also compare to:
    AUTHORITY-CHECK <object>
    ID 'KOSTL' '*'.
    I cannot confess to ever have done a "full" AUTHORITY-CHECK myself, but it is most likely the same as with DUMMY ->  you should not use the FIELD statement as '' value if the data element does not know what a '' is...
    Cheers,
    Julius

  • Override Company and Cost Center for FI Posting from HR Payroll

    Hello all. I have this scenario with a company that was merged into another and retroactive payroll occurs for absences and extra time in the "old" company, but the "old" merged company is closed so no postings can occur.
    I also found this unanswered post:  How to Override Company and Cost Center for FI Posting from HR Payroll
    We suppose that retroactive differences could be accounted in the new company code but I didnu2019t found any way to do it even in the BADI SMOD_PCPO0001 I couldnu2019t find a way to change the company code/cost center....
    Does anyone have dealt with the same problem? What is the solution?

    Amosha, thank you for your response.  Here is PCP0 that shows what I mean by 'header company code' that I don't see how to change (I re-ran pd 26 2008--bi-weekly payroll, btw):
    06/30/2009 Posting Document
    Run                      0000002791
    Company Code    0057
    Document            0000008174
    PostingCurrency  USD
    Reference           HRPAY00009
    Doc. Type            ZB
    Run Type             PP
    Posting Date        12/01/2008
    Documant Type   G/L Account Document   
    Document Date    06/30/2009
    Bus. Transaction HRP1
        There are error messages for this document
    Account Number with Text
    21301000   Accrued Salaries & Wages   CCTR 14515      ...
    20303998   HR P/R Doc Split                                               ...
    Messages for Document 000008174
    Error in document: HRPAY 0000008174
    The CO account assignment object belongs to company code 0001, not 0057
    Company code 0057 is now closed and has been merged into 0001.  Cost center 14515 in the above doc was populated by my clone of RPCIPE00 and call to my BAdI which retrieved current company and cost center from PA0001.  You can see from above that the 'header' data still shows 0057 and indeed, my version of RPCIPE00 only changes P_ITEM-BUKRS, P_ITEM-KOSTL and P_ITEM-SGTXT.  It looks to me that fm HRPP_TRANSLATE_FICO gets the 'header' company code afresh.  I was planning to leave WPBP-BUKRS (and all other Payroll data) alone (ie, not override company code).
    As for your other question, we post retros to /551 and /552. 
    Thanks again.

  • How to Override Company and Cost Center for FI Posting from HR Payroll

    Current problem:  A company code has been 'merged' into another one and the old company code can no longer be used.  In the last payroll run, there was a rate change that caused a retro back to the time of the old company code and since the old company code and cost center were closed, the FI posting error'ed out.  To correct, we had to delete the offending pernr from the cluster and back out the rate change until we came up with a solution. 
    Investigation has revealed a process called 'Substitute Cost Centers', but we tested it and a 'flusher' cost center is required to be set up in the old company code and FI refuses to open it up. 
    Also, I've located 3 user exits for RPCIPE00, but I do not see where  company and cost center can be changed.  So I've tried to code my own BAdi, but there seems to be a header company code that I'm not getting.  The item company code and cost center seem to be doable, but I don't know how to change the header company code.
    I am new to HR and Payroll having spent the last couple of years in BI and before that I worked with the material master and Purchasing.  It is my humble opinion that the company should not have been 'turned off' until Payroll was finished with it and that means 2 years until we archive.  In reading about symbolic accounts, several times it is written not ever to delete them.  Seems to me company code is the same.  But surely I must be wrong and there is a solution that will make everybody happy. 
    I would appreciate any and all ideas.  Thank you so much.

    Amosha, thank you for your response.  Here is PCP0 that shows what I mean by 'header company code' that I don't see how to change (I re-ran pd 26 2008--bi-weekly payroll, btw):
    06/30/2009 Posting Document
    Run                      0000002791
    Company Code    0057
    Document            0000008174
    PostingCurrency  USD
    Reference           HRPAY00009
    Doc. Type            ZB
    Run Type             PP
    Posting Date        12/01/2008
    Documant Type   G/L Account Document   
    Document Date    06/30/2009
    Bus. Transaction HRP1
        There are error messages for this document
    Account Number with Text
    21301000   Accrued Salaries & Wages   CCTR 14515      ...
    20303998   HR P/R Doc Split                                               ...
    Messages for Document 000008174
    Error in document: HRPAY 0000008174
    The CO account assignment object belongs to company code 0001, not 0057
    Company code 0057 is now closed and has been merged into 0001.  Cost center 14515 in the above doc was populated by my clone of RPCIPE00 and call to my BAdI which retrieved current company and cost center from PA0001.  You can see from above that the 'header' data still shows 0057 and indeed, my version of RPCIPE00 only changes P_ITEM-BUKRS, P_ITEM-KOSTL and P_ITEM-SGTXT.  It looks to me that fm HRPP_TRANSLATE_FICO gets the 'header' company code afresh.  I was planning to leave WPBP-BUKRS (and all other Payroll data) alone (ie, not override company code).
    As for your other question, we post retros to /551 and /552. 
    Thanks again.

  • COOMKS01 - SAP Cost Center table modification

    I have been reading up on customizing the cost center table to add additional fields via this enhancement COOMKS01. Does anybody have any documentation showing how to complete the enhancement from start to finish, including adding the fields onto the screen KS01, KS02, KS03...
    Many thanks in advance.

    Hi,
        In the enhancement COOMKS01go to the fumction module exit and place the cursor on the functionmodule exit and goto---> Smaple Code and also go for Documentation..
    Regards,
    Vijaya Lakshmi.T

  • Configuring ISR Scenario SRK1 (Create Cost Center Request) with Adobe forms

    Hello,
    I am trying to configure the ISR scenario SRK1 (Create Cost Center Request) with Adobe Interactive Forms.
    However when I am trying to generate the form, it is giving an error TR015(Object can only be created in SAP package)
    Apparently by default it tries to create form Adobe form ISR_FORM_SRK1.
    Even if I change that name to ZISR_FORM_SRK1, it tries to create interface ISR_IF_SRK1 which is in SAP's namespace and I cannot generate the form. I cannot seem to be able to force SAP to use a different Interface name. The field for the interface is greyed out and is not picked up
    Am I missing any step or is there any fix to this problem?
    regards,
    Atul Kulkarni

    Hi,
    From the config it picks the formscenario(SRK1) and prefixes the same for adobe form.
    I think the best option would be to copy the Stnadard form scenario to ZSRK1 and proceed. This copy can be done from the config 'Manage Form Scenarios' under this select the option 'Copy form scenario'. This copies the entire config from SRK1 to ZSRK1.
    Regards
    Srikanth KV

  • CK666 error in cross company code  cost estimate

    Dear All,
    We have activated multiple valuations/transfer prices : legal, group and profit center valuations.
    We perform cost estimate run in ck40n for profit center valuation and get error
    Material 20000035/plant FZ03: Transfer price could not be found.
    Message no. CK666
    Diagnosis
    When switching profit center A ->B (from the material component to the costing object), a transfer price could not be determined for transfer price variant 0 in respect of material 20000035 in plant 1.
    System Response
    If you carry out costing for a profit center valuation, material 20000035 goes into the cost estimate without a value.
    If you create a cost estimate for group valuation, profit from material 20000035 is not transferred into the cost component split.
    Procedure
    Check the settings for transfer price variant 0.
    We have checked this material. Manufacturing plant belongs to  company code A.
    To get cost estimate for plant 2 which belongs to company code B we use procurement types in material master.
    It requires now transfer price variant. But we do not want to use this functionality.
    How can we solve this issue?
    With best regards,
    Kamila.

    HI Kamila.
    There is a difference in the way PCA handles determining costs:
    If transfer prices are activated it's necessary to determine either a transfer price via pricing or to exclude the relevant material
    from the transfer prices scenario via user-exit 'EXIT_SAPLPCRW_003'.
    Please note that the determination of a transfer price and the creation of additional PCA lines are independent of each other. You cannot control the determination of a transfer price by means of your 0KEK settings. So if you want that no transfer price is used for a material please use exit 'EXIT_SAPLPCRW_003' here. Pricing will then not be called and the system automatically uses the current
    material price from the profitcenter view.
    Please have a look at the note [458543 |https://css.wdf.sap.corp/sap(bD1lbiZjPTAwMQ==)/bc/bsp/spn/sapnotes/index2.htm?numm=0000458543]which provides further information regarding this exit.
    Regards,Declan

  • Commitment code---cost center and gl

    There is a issue regarding budgeting.
    we have some option that we are considering. pls give some views on it
    option 1  whenever  we put a  cost center while making any posting ,system picks up a commitment code and then budget gets allocated. but here same commitment code gets selected for same cost center but different expenses in same cost center.
    cost center is a/c              commitment code is       cc1    (g/l 1 repairs)
    cost center is a/c              commitment ocde is       cc2    (g/l 2 salary )
    option 2.  we have a GL bank charges and cost center  then based on this combination of gl and cost center a specific commitment code    a/c-b.charges get filled in commitment field.
    if we have another cost center (IT) and same GL bank charges then based on this second combination another commitment code gets selected     IT-b.charges
    so    for  cost center 1              if there are 30 commitment codes
    then for  cost center 2              there will be another 30 commitment codes
    so we have 60 cost centers then in all we will have 1800 commitment codes.
    we want a way in which less commitment codes are opened yet we are able to achieve what we are getting in second option.

    Hi
    U r using Fund management , In Fund Manageemnt there are derivation rule. u create a GL account in FS00 , suppose Stationry expenses.the Same Account u created in fund management called commitemtn item.Suppose statioanry expenses.
    in fund management u are also create fun center
    u crerate aderivation rule, in derivation rule u assign :-
    Cost center = GL Accounts
    Cost Center=Comitment item=GL accounts
    Fund center= Asset account
    if any query feel free ask me
    Regards
    Roobal

  • Authorization at Company Code Level for table FEBKO

    Hello Experts,
    I need to add authorization check on my report program that accesses and displays data from table FEBKO. However the user should only be able to access the data of table FEBKO particular only for their company code. How can I apply this? Thanks in advance for all your responses!
    Best Regards,
    Kurtt

    Hi,
    if it is in your own report, you can define your own authorization object with field for company code. Check transaction SU21 or ask your security guy. Then you will check if an user have authorization for this object.
    Cheers

  • Entity Dimension - Company Code + Profit Center

    Dear experts,
    I'm in a BPC project in NW, the project has two fronts, planning and consolidation, in specific I am with the initial concern of how to organize the dimensions, and is used by both sides.
    Explaining the situation, we will do the planning and legal and management consolidation, ie we must have a vision of the organization by Company (Company Code) and Enterprise Center (Profit Center), here comes the first question, Do we need to organize the Entity Dimension structure with a hierarchy of hybrid company and profit center? Ie:
    Say a company has the following structure:
    The Company A is a holding company with Company B controlled.
    Under the Company A have two enterprise center: X and Y;
    Under the Company B have tree enterprise center : V, W and Z;
    Thus the structure of ParentH1 would get this:
    ID  ParentH1
    A
    B     A
    X     A
    Y     A
    V     B
    W    B
    Z     B
    This interpretation is correct? What are the impediments to the COI if any.
    Thanks
    Alexandre

    Alexandre,
    I'm with the same doubt, do you get the answer ?
    Please some one knows the answer ?
    Best Regards

  • Urgent....work-center/cost center table...have ur point.s

    Hi all,
    I have work-center, I want to find the corresponding cost-center.
    But on screen i m getting structure CRKEYK.
    Please let me know the table...
    Urgent.
    <b>Help me ....n have ur points.</b>
    regards,

    Hi Pradeep,
    AFRV is the table which will have both work center & cost center.
    <b>Reward points if it helps,</b>
    Satish

  • Populating T001T (Company Code Long Description) table

    Hi All,
    I was wondering if anyone can help me as to how to populate T001T table.  Below is what I did:
    > SM30
    > V_T001T
    > Enter Company Code
    > Enter Name of Standard Text
    > Enter Text Usage (Company Code Long Description)
    > Press Enter
    Once I press 'Enter', the Company Code in the Company Code column becomes blank.  Do you know as to why this happens?!?  I feel like I'm missing some sort of configuration or something.
    I appreciate any help.
    Thank you.
    Rob

    I was looking at the where-used for this table and all I see is that it is used in some sample table maintenance code.
    So my question is what are you using this for, just trying out, or for some real business need? Since it is not used by SAP for any purpose, I don't know what is the purpose of maintaining it.
    Srinivas

  • Register Cost Center Table FAGLFLEXT

    Hi!
    How do I register Center Cost in Table:: FAGLFLEXT?
    Regards,
    Cristiane.

    Yes, the cost centers are already active in CO.
    How do I check if they are active in FI?
    The problem is that in the release of Ledger Tax expenditures are only coming to the ledger account, but is missing the Cost Center.
    How do I bring the Cost Center once it is reported in the original release.
    Regards,
    Cristiane,

  • Cost center table

    WE have FICO and HR modules on different Boxes. We use BD16 to ALE CostCenters from Finance to HR BOX.
    Is there a Trasansaction code where we can ALE 100 Costcenters at one time. BD16 allows only one costcenter right now

    Hi Rahul,
    Use BD16 itself and in selection screen give all 100 cost centers. This process will create 100 Idocs and transferting them to inbound processing in inbound will be come simple scenario.
    Satya

Maybe you are looking for