Stock Transport order Should not Reserve material

Hi
When i create a stock transport order the material is getting reserved.
What should be done so that material is not reserved against the stock transport order
Regds
RB

Hi,
Check in OPJJ whether auto  reservation is checked
Regards

Similar Messages

  • Stock Transport Order for non valuated material

    Hello,
    I am creating a Stock Transport Order for non-valuated material. I posted GI for STO mvt 351 and it decreases stock from issuing Storage Location, however when I am posting GR for STO mvt 101 the Storage Location field is not there in MIGO and after posting the quantity does not increase in receiving Storage Location which is not expected. Note that both issuing and receiving Plants are the same and the material type has quantity update in the Plant.
    Also in the STO the system is asking for Account Assignment Category which I do not need because there are no transportation costs. Can i overcome that ?
    Thanks,
    Wael

    Hi,
    The quantity update is set for the material type in the plant as I mentioned. Also since both issuing and receiving plants are identical and there is stock in the issuing SLoc this means quantity update is active.
    Thanks

  • Stock Transport Order - Partners not Determined

    Hi Colleagues,
    We have a simple Intra company Stock Transport Order and want to get the partner function 'VN' into the purchase order and then into the Inbound Delivery
    We have configured the partner schemas and assigned to the vendor account group 0007. Partners are created in the plant vendor record
    We have configured the purchase document schema and assigned this to document type 'UB'. However, the partners are not defaulted into the STO. We can assign them manually
    However, when we create the Inbound Delivery for the STO the vendor is not defaulted into the delivery and gives an incompletion error. We can manually enter vendor in the inbound delivery and then save the document.
    Any Ideas what is wrong or missing?
    Thanks
    Steve

    have a look into OSS note 863541 - Standard vendor for inbound delivery w/ purchase order refer

  • Stock Transport Order Doc not being saved

    Hi Gurus,
    I need your help urgently
    When I save a stock transport order, the system gives me a message and number indicating that the records have been saved.
    When I try to display or process a goods issue against this document it says that the document does not exist.
    This document has the same number range with the standard PO which is very okay.
    The funny thing is that the stuff was working fine last week.
    Thanks for your support.

    Hi, Check the SBWP Transaction UpdateTermination message .Thier is some problem with config.Just check the message and write back the message number.
    and the details like.
    Update was terminated
    Transaction..  
    Update key...  
    Error Info...                   
    We will try something
    Lekhram

  • Commitment Item error in Stock transport order

    Hi all
    I have a stock transport order (STO) for a material non valuated in both sending and receiving plants.
    While creation , there is an error with respect to completion of an "committment item" *.
    If I input  the committment item in  STO create transaction in R3 , the STO is  saved  (permitting blank account assignment for the STO item  as intended)  and there is no further issue till post goods issue in sending plant or GR in receiving plant.
    The problem is however that this STO is triggered from APO and transferred via CIF to R3 while there is no chance to input the commitment item. This results into a CIF error with the STO not created  in both R3 and APO.
    Is there a way I could bypass this "committment stuff" in this situation?
    Thanks in advance
    Anton
    *The exact error message is as follows;
    "  No commitment item entered in item 00001 plant < >
       Message no. FI311
    Diagnosis
    The posted document contains at least one company code in which Funds Management, Cash Budget Management, or Project Cash Management is active. Therefore you must enter a commitment item in all involved company codes.
    Procedure
    Enter a commitment item.
    If you cannot enter a commitment item, check with your system administrator that your account assignment derivation is adjusted so that the system can automatically derive a commitment item from another account assignment, or from the G/L or cost element.   "

    Hi,
    Did you try using derivation rule using FMDERIVE in case funds management is active.
    Please also refer to the link below which guides on the item category to be assigned in Commitment item.
    http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/f0/ca5716260211d28a430000e829fbbd/frameset.htm
    Regards
    K.R

  • Overdelivery in intra-company stock transport order

    Hello,
    I have the following scenario - I have two plants, 1000 and 2000, both under the same company code.
    I transfer 450KG of material 123456 from plant 1000 using STO with SD (mvt. type 641), material is packed in HUs. In the receiving plant, the HUs are being place on a weight to check their actual weight. It;s possible for the actual weight be greater than the GI weight of 450KG (for example, due to weight scale accuracy issues) . When doing GR, I need to be able to receive quantity greater than the GI quantity. That is not allowed in stock transport order (per note 212387). For the same scenario with intercompany STO (GI mvt type 643) I'm able to post GR quantity which is greater than GI qty.
    Any suggestion on how to solve this? Can I create a customer order type that is both intra-company and allows for overdelivery?
    Thanks,
    Yossi

    a overdelivery does not make any sense in stock transfers, you would solve the problem of the stock accuracy in the receiving plant, but at the same time you create another problem with a negative stock in transit, that never gets cleared.
    a STO having stock left in transit is never considered as closed. even intercompany stock transfers are not considered as closed, even you can receive more than issued.
    Latest when archiving purchasing documents then you will see all your error in the process design, because only closed business cases can be archived.
    in stock transfer business you always have to care about both sides, you cannot just care about the receiving plant and ignore the problems of the sending plant.

  • Link between batch stock and stock transport order no.

    hello all,
    my client want the report for stock in hand against batch and sto no..in standard tcode mb52(stock in hand) we can see the stock against batches.but i want the report for which sto no. stock is recieved corresponding to batch.
    pls tell me from which table and field i should pick data for stock against sto no.
    thanks in advance for ur valuable input
    regards
    simran
    caution-- we are using two step procedure with stock transport order for transferring the material between plants

    S

  • Excise Duty handling for Inter company Stock Transport Orders in SAP 4.6C

    I want to handle Excise Duty handling for Inter company Stock Transport Orders in SAP 4.6C. I know that SAP has provided standard solutions in 4.7C by giving one standard table OIH09 which can be maintained through Customisation.
    In 4.6C, even the Goods issue & Goods receipt button in item details of Stock Transport order is not available.
    Is there any work around for the same.

    In IS-OIL, cross company postings were stopped with Note #  623910 & would
    require a core modification to achieve this functionality.

  • Stock Should not block in sasles Order,Sales Order stock should not Reserve

    Stock should not reserve againest sales order, system should show the status confirm quantity or not,
    How to Configure this for this scenario?

    HI,
    To map this scenario u hav to maintain the config settings for TOR and avaliability check for that document type and material and if u want to see the status confirm quantity or not use tcode MD04 or table VBBE is useful for u.
    Regards,
    kishore.
    Edited by: kishore gopala on Feb 26, 2008 6:16 AM

  • Change the valuation class of material [Stock transport order scenario]

    Dears,
    Client would like to change the valuation class of material.
    There is no open Purchase order/Process order/Purchase requistion and stock in plant.
    Scenario- One Stock transport order is created.
    For same goods issue (351-issuing plant) and goods receipt (101-receiving plant) is done.
    When we are going to change the valuation class of said material, message is "purchase order is open
    and it shows the no of STO [for which receipt and issue is done]"
    To resolve this issue we had first delete the STO line item no(ME22N). Then change the valuation class.
    (this allows). and then undelete the STO line item. Through this we can change the valuation class of material.
    Please advise in such business process that this is right way or there may be other option.
    Thanks & Regards
    Rajan

    rajanshah219,
    Here's my take on how to fix:
    *Manually change Config TCode OMT4 - change message MM 326 & 327 to type "W"   (if open order exists...now you can enter through warning messages)
    *If inventory exists, then issue out of stock to a cost center
    *Change valuation class
    *Put stock back into inventory (reverse to that same cost center)  Note issue out and reverse back into inventory must happen in the same posting period.
    **Valuation class should be changed as expected
    **Manually change config  TCode OMT4 - change message MM 326 & 327 back to type "E"
    Thanks,
    Jason

  • Stock Transport Order-shipping point not determined

    Hi MM Gurus,
    We need to set up STO for transferring stock from plant 2000 to 1000. I have completed following setting.
    IMG
    Enterprise Structure-Assignment-Sales and Distribution-Assign sales organization to company code
    Both the sales orgnizations are in same company code. We have only one company code.
    Enterprise Structure-Assignment-Sales and Distribution-Assign sales organization - distribution channel - plant
    The sales area 1000 is are assigned to both the plants 1000 & 2000 and sales area 2000 is also assigned to both the plants.
    Enterprise Structure-Assignment-Logistics Execution-Assign shipping point to plant
    Plant 1000 is assigned to sales area 1000 & 2000. Plant 2000 is assigned to sales area 1000 & 2000.
    Materials Management-Purchasing-Purchase Order-Set up Stock Transport Order-Define Shipping Data for Plants
    For plant 1000 & 2000 cusomer master 56 & 57 respectively are maintained. The sales orginzation for these plants are 1000 & 2000 respectively.
    Materials Management-Purchasing-Purchase Order-Set up Stock Transport Order-Assign Delivery Type and Checking Rule
    Delivery type NL has been assigned to document type UB.
    The details of customer master 56 & 57 are as below
    Account Group - Sold To Party
    Reconcilliation account -121000
    Delivery plant 1000 & 2000 respectively
    Please note - No vendor number is maintained in these cusomer masters.
    Created these plants as vendors
    Account group 0007(Plants) and assigned plant numbers in the  additional data of purchasing.
    Material 251 is created and maintained in both the sales orgnization.
    Now when I am creating the STO for transferring goods from plant 2000 to 1000, I am getting error message.
    "Not possible to determine shipping data for material 251"
    Am I missing something? Some documentation say that I should create a receiving plant as customer in the sales area of supplying plant. If this is true, how to do it?
    Also, what is the significance of return vendor (maintaining vendor master in the customer) in this case?
    Your any clue will be appreciated.
    Thanks,
    Shekhar

    Shekhar,
    Customer must be maintained as a shipto as well.  
    In your STO config settings you don't need a customer assigned to the source plant, unless it will also be a destination plant (e.g. you also intend to execute STOs in the reverse direction, or from another plant).
    While looking at your customer (shipto), you will also want to look at Route Determination for this customer.  Typically, your route will be defined by customer zone (from cust master), shipping point zone (from shipping point definition configuration), and shipping conditions (customer master).  Route will be used during delivery creation to schedule the delivery.  Logically, the total duration between Material Availability date to Delivery date of the delivery (picking/packing/load/transit) should be something close to the planned delivery time in the Material Master, in order to maintain consistency throughout the entire planning and execution process.
    Don't forget to maintain your STO Purchase req stuff IMG>MM>Purch>PurReq>Set up Stock Transport Requisition.
    Rgds,
    DB49

  • Stock Transport Order - Material Costs

    Hi,
    We have created one stock transport order with two parts (for example part A and part B). The problem is, for Part A, condition type Z101 is fetching the cost of current period but for Part B same conditin type is fetching the cost of previous period. Ideally both should be current period.
    I have check Material master and also condition type but could not figure this out.
    Could you please let me know whereelse I can look for..?
    Thanks & Regards,
    Samay Mehta

    Sanjay -
    Ut question is vague.
    check the condition records. Some thing might went wrong in setting up the condition records.
    Thanks,
    Shiva.

  • Stock Transport Order (STO)will not create delivery

    I have created a intercompany Stock Transport Order (STO) and it has created the shipping tab in the Purchase order(PO), and all seems to be correct.
    I have material in the plant, yet when I go to create the delivery using VL10G, the PO does not show as a choice. I also do not get an error, so I cannot tell why it is not creating the delivery.
    Is there a way to see an anaylis of why the STO is not showing as a choice?
    Thanks,

    Hi,
    Please check the delivery date in the STO created.and adjust the del creation date etc input fields at VL10G and try the posting.If there exists no error in the po created.

  • Pick/Pack Times not relevant in Stock Transport Orders?

    Hi gurus. I have a question.
    I have Pick/Pack times maintained in our Shipping Routes. In my tests I notice that entering days or hours here modify my "Material Availability Date" in Sales Orders, so I need to have the material on stock some time before shipment.
    My question is, are these Picik/Pack times relevant for Stock Transport Orders? There's no "Material Availability Date" in those documents, and in my tests, the time I put as Pick/Pack time doesn't affect the STOs.
    If these values are not relevant for STOs, I'd like to know, is there something that will?

    Hi,
    It did not work. I created a new pricing procedure as a copy of the standard for STO (RM2000). Then, I added the tax condition "NAVS". I created a new document type as a copy of UB and assign the new pricing procedure to it. I also changed the field selection for STO and made the tax code optional.
    I created STO using new document type. Tax code and tax jurisdiction code are defaulting now based on condition record NAVS. However, taxes are not calculated. Base amount shows as zero and no tax calculations are done.
    Regards, Jose Oyon.

  • Stock transport order between storage locations and assignment category type E not in MRP

    Hello Gurus,
    I have a stock transport order between 2 storage location which belongs to the same plant. Besides the stock transport order is allocated to a sales order (account assigment category E). When I run the MD03, the system take into account the quantity of the stock transport order as a future entry and this is wrong. I need that the MRP has not into account the stock transport order as an entry.
    As an important information, If I modify the stock transport order removing the account asignment category E (sales order), then the MRP doesn't take into account it, so this is correct.
    Could anybody tell me how to get it?
    Thanks in advanced.

    Laura,
    It is normal that MRP will consider an STO as a receipt element; this is basic planning.  It is unclear to me why you think you do not want it to do so, but I will assume you have some logical reason.
    Contrary to what some others may have suggested, changing the scope of check for availability checking has no effect on which elements are considered for MRP.  MRP is a completely separate functionality from Availability Check.
    For Location > Location STOs (within a plant), then, you normally have the receipt element of the STO in the destination storage location, and the requirements element of an equal amount in the source storage location.  Net of these two elements is zero, unless you have already issued the STO at the source location.
    Changing the Account assignment from "E" means that the STO will not be relevant for your Sales order (in other words, when you receive this STO into the destination storage location, it cannot be used for your sales order).  In a general MTO scenario, it also means that the proceeds of this STO (the stock you received) cannot be used for ANY sales orders.
    One way that some people make an STO 'not relevant' for MRP is to alter the destination storage location such that it is not relevant for MRP.  You can change the MRP relevancy of the storage location in MM02 > MRP4 tab
    Best Regards,
    DB49

Maybe you are looking for