Subcontracting and atp check
hi
has anyone out there found an error or questionable conduct by ATP in a Subcontractor PO, ie partial deliveries with the change of BOM afterwards and a new ATP ????
Does SAP SubContracting work 100%?
Refer note 323991.
Similar Messages
-
Avaliability check and ATP check for material in CO02 tcode
Hello All,
I have a requirement where i am building a portal for WM pick list . The requirment is like i enter a production order number on the screen and gives me the material and it's corresponding components. Now the user has the option to select these components (more than one at a time ) . Now, i have provided few buttons like ATP Check, Pick component etc.
I need to check the availabilty for the selected order components from the list. If the ATP check is successful and all the parts are available, then user can continue with the WM pick process and the Pick Component button becomes active.
Does anyone has any idea on how to find the availability for the individual component and if yes please provide the steps to do it.
Thanks & Regards,
Ravi AswaniHi ,
You can check the availability of material (component ) via the following function modules
MD_STOCK_REQUIREMENTS_LIST_API and BAPI_MATERIAL_STOCK_REQ_LIST
Please check the above two function module for your requirement .
you can use this function module in your customized progam to check the material stock.
Hope this information helpful.
Best regards,
Chithaanantham -
Order Processing - Capacity and ATP check with planned order
Dear all,
is it possible to block the creation of a sale order based with PP strategy 81 (or similar) if missing components for planned order are given?
Is also possible to block the creation of a sale order with PP strategy 81 (or similar) if no alllowable capacity for planned order is given in the scheduled dates?Luca,
is it possible to block the creation of a sale order based with PP strategy 81 (or similar) if missing components for planned order are given?
Not in Standard SAP ERP. You can block confirmation in 81 or 82.
Is also possible to block the creation of a sale order with PP strategy 81 (or similar) if no allowable capacity for planned order is given in the scheduled dates?
Not in standard SAP ERP. It is possible to generate a notification popup during the capacity check.
The functionalities you seek exist in APO using either CTP or MATP
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_scm70/helpdata/EN/25/b0c23ba6af1855e10000000a11402f/frameset.htm
Best Regards,
DB49 -
Warehouse blocked for ATP Check
Hello Everybody.
I need create a warehouse with the characteristic that the stock in this warehouse must not be considered in the ATP check.
Where I can customize this characteristic?
Thanks in advance.Silvia,
Warehouse management has nothing to do with ATP check. ATP check works at IM level only, please control it through SLoc.
- you can use SLoc MRP to exlude SLoc from planning and ATP check
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/EN/f4/7d2d2644af11d182b40000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
- you can exlude ceratain stock types from ATP check - see SPRO > Sales and Distribution > Basic Functions > Availibility Check and Trnasfer of Requirements > Availability Check > AC with ATP Logic or Against Planning > Carry out Control For Availability Check (OVZ9)
- you can use MRP area
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/EN/c4/106956ae8a11d1a6720000e83235d4/frameset.htm
Regards,
Csaba -
ATP check for materials and ATP Confirmed Qty's
Good morning,
I have a question regarding the ATP.
If I have a 100 of box a in stock and I have 2 Planned Orders for 75 (total req on box is 150).
When I convert the first Planned Ord to a Prodution Ord, the ATP check will run and confirm that I have the 75 boxes required (as we want it), but if I then convert the second Planned Order I would expect the ATP to say that only 25 is available, but it is also telling me that the 75 boxes required are available.
Can I set the ATP to confirm/allocate the first 75 boxes to the first Production Order and when the second order runs ATP to only commit to 25?
Thanks in advance.
ATP novice :o)Hi Guy Hall,
Please check with, "include dependent reservation and production order" has been activated for checking rule used for production order at "avilabilty checking scope"
Regards
Pradeep -
ATP check in the Sale order Processing and CO06 transaction (Confirm Qty)
Hi All,
While creating the Sale order, After performing the ATP check and saving the document i have called an user exit to make the confirmed Quantity equal to ZERO when the delivery block is set (As requested by customer). That is working fine...
But the same confirmed Quantity of ZERO is not reflecting in CO06 transaction. Its showing the old value that the value before setting the delivery block.
I have identified the table VBBE-VMENG which stores the confirmed quantity in CO06 transaction...
Could you please help me know any USER EXITS or any other solution to change the confirmed quantity to ZERO in CO06 transaction also while delivery block is set in the sale order.
Thanks &Regards,
NavaneethHi All,
Please help me by providing some clues on this issue...
Regards,
Navaneeth -
ATP Check: R/3 and APO
Hi All,
My Query related to an Earlier Post (GATP: Unable to check ATP (in GATP) when creating sales order in R/3).
I would like to change the settings for ATP Check from APO system to R/3, I.E, the ATP Check for Business Rule should be triggered in R/3 and not in APO.
In the earlier post, inputs were provided for the following:
- Activation of ATP in external system: this is done in SPRO in the data transfer section.
- Another common point is cheking rule: In SPRO see that your business event(SO) is enabled for ATP check.
As per my information, the 'ATP Check' tick is possible at the level of Checking Group and Schedule Line Category in R/3
Could someone please provide inputs as to where in SPRO can we check the above 2 points mentioned?
regards,
SudhirHi Sudhir,
The following are the points where changes are required for ATP check in APO.
The presumption is that there already is a active CIF connection.
1) MRP type of the material has to be 'XO'
2) Define an integration model for ATP checks of those materials.
3) Define Checking Group. SPRO -> S&D -> Basic Functions -> Availability Check -> Availability check with ATP logic.(Here you define 02 - individual requirement)
4) Define Check Control: the path is same. (Note that the combination of 02 & A is added)
5) Define Requirement Class: the path is same. Here you put the availability check tick. Use 050 & check availability check & transfer of requirement for them.
6) Next you define procedure for the schedule lines.( hope this is what you were looking for.
7) Go to SPRO -> integration with other SAP components -> APO -> Basic settings for data transfer -> Change Transfer -> Change Transfer for master data -> Activate change pointers Generally and tick it.
You are now ready to for ATP of SOs from R/3 in APO.
All setteings required in APO for GATP is clearly mentioned in APO help docs.
Sure it will work for you.
All the best
Regards
Santanu Dawn -
Shipping notification and PO outstanding qty in ATP check
Hi all,
I have the following situation: intercompany purchase order process with confirmation control key (including outbound and inbound delivery). In my ATP check I have included purchase orders and shipping notifications. This has as consequence that after the outbound delivery is created and outstanding quantity remains open in the PO (due to the nature of our business), this will disappear when the PO is received. However, while this qty is open, it could be taken into account as available to promise and it can lead to unreal sales order confirmations.
Does anyone know if there's a way to eliminate this outstanding qty without changing the PO qty and keeping PO's and shipping notifications in the ATP check.
Thanks in advance.
JC GaritaDear KANTH,
Documents without order number in ATP are always temporary quantity assignments (TQAs). If the order number was known at the time of running the ATP check, the TQA carries the order number, otherwise it carries e.g. <unknown>. The TQA carries order number <unknown> until either the item is converted or a new ATP check is executed.
Please also have a look at the note 488725 mainly points 4.,5. and 8.
You can delete the old assignements with the report /SAPAPO/om_delta_remove_older (via SE38).
Alternatively you can delete the TQA's manually. Use transaction /SAPAPO/AC06., just delete the user and generation date and execute.
The system behaviour should be fine after the deletion of the hanging TQA's.
Regards,
Tibor -
ATP Check for service parts and procurement scenario
Dear Experts,
We're testing CRM service scenario, focusing on the ATP check.
After running the avaiability check for the service parts in the service order,
is it posssible to determine the scenario automatically as follows?
- when the necessary parts items are not available
-> "Procurement" scenario will be used.
The corresponding documents such as PO, PR or Reservation will be generated in ERP according to the setting "Define Logistics Scenario for the Procurement of Materials and Services".
- when the necessary parts items are available in stock
-> "Material withdrawal" scenario will be used. The items will be withdrawn at the service confirmation.
From our understanding, the determination of the above scenario is controlled by the item type(ex.SRVP),
so we expect that the system sets the appropriate item type depending on whether the item is available or not.
Is there any possible solution for this?(i.e.standard customizing, BAdI etc....)
Any advice would be higly appreciated.
Best regards,
F.T.Hi F.T,
I have worked in Service Order Management Scenario, but not integration of Service Orders for ATP Check. But I found this Presentation which I hope might be somewhat helpful regarding the feasibility of the Business Scenario. You can have look at the same and will be able to decide if this is the correct way forward or not.
[Presentation|http://www.google.co.in/#hl=en&biw=1366&bih=548&q=ATPCheckforservicepartsandprocurementscenarioinSAPCRM+++&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai=&fp=a254323013e5943b]
Hope this will help.
Thanks,
Samantak. -
ATP check by valuation type and batches???
Dear experts,
I create a seles order, input one material and valuation type, I can't fix the batche in sales order,the system give a message as following, so the ATP check is wrong.is there any solution to deal this issue?
"Availability check for material 21-01 only occurs at plant level
Message no. V1562
Diagnosis
You entered valuation type 9999999999999 for material 21-01 which is to be handled in batches without specifying a batch. Therefore, an availability check can only occur at plant level since it is not possible to determine all batches belonging to the valuation type. Usually, the plant stock level is higher than the stock level within a valuation type. Too much may be confirmed as a result.
Procedure
When you enter a batch number, the availability check occurs at batch level."
Best regards
Lanceby myself
-
CRM sales order and APO ATP check
Hi!
which steps are done when an ATP check ist triggered in APO by a CRM sales order item?
- are temporary quantity assignments created in APO?
- are these delta records deleted when the sales order is saved?
- are these sales order items transferred via the middle ware to APO?Hi,
Find answers below for each of your question.
which steps are done when an ATP check ist triggered in APO by a CRM sales order item?
- are temporary quantity assignments created in APO? YES.
- are these delta records deleted when the sales order is saved? YES. As normal behaviour.
- are these sales order items transferred via the middle ware to APO? Sales orders are flown from CRM to ERP (Middle ware) and from there we used to CIF to SCM. No idea abt sales order transfer from CRM to SCM.
Best Regards,
Deepthi -
ATP Check include in MRP and Exclude on Process order
Dear all,
We have a situation if we include reservations, deliveries and dependent requirements in ATP check in OPJJ, the system behaviour is that it includes all of them during MRP run. On process order level if we perform ATP check the system shows that all materials are available as it includes the dependent requirements and deliveries as well. we want to exclude dependent requirements and deliveries from ATP check on process order level so that it can only consider the quantities that are available in stock. and system will block the release of process order in case of short fall. as system includes dependent requirements and deliveries as well it always shows the msg that all material are available. Plz help and reply soon...... any suggestions or work arounds are always well come ..............Hi
as i understand from ur question u dont want to considered dependent requrement and delivaries for
this go to t code OPJJ and do not select dependent requrement and delivaries tick.
after that go to t code OPJK and select material avalability as -03-No creation if material is missing
hope this will help u
regards
sachin -
How to execute ATP check and update schedule lines for existing sales order
Hello all,
After stock quantity has been updated, wed like to perform ATP check and update schedule lines for sales documents which have not been delivered yet.
Is BAPI_SALESDOCUMENT_CHANGE useful to do so?
If so which fields should I set X?
At the moment, I called BATCH INPUT and execute ATP check.
But I'm wondering if this is not a smart way.
Thank you
YukoHi arnab
one way of achieving your requirements is
after creating the sales order you can execute the SALEs order MRP using MD50 transaction enter the order # and MRP control parameters 1,3,1,2. and execute.
Ensure the following before MRP.
1. All the master data are maintained for the schedule line creation for the components ( Source list, Scheduling agreements)
2. Material master with valid MRP data.strategy group having MTO strategy.
after sales order MRP you will get the schedule line created for the components
also MRp will create the cpacity requirements as we run the MRP with Lead time scheduling.
Hope this helps
SK
Reward your points -
ATP check and Check against preliminary planning for prod order
Hi
For same material, order type and plant for some orders ATP check is happening and for some orders Check against preliminary planning is happening.I want to know why its happening.
Regards,
PradeepM.Pradeep,
What types of orders? Do you mean SD orders?
ATP check is defaulted 'on' or 'not on' by the MRP Strategy(OPPS, look for "availability check"). MRP strategy is in turn determined by the MRP strategy group in the plant-level material master. Assuming, then, that your MRP strategy group contains only one MRP strategy (this is common), then the default check will be set by MRP strategy group.
ATP check can subsequently be turned on/off other ways in SD, leaving you with either no ATP, or possibly an Availability check against planning.
So, if you are talking about sales orders, and not PP orders, the most likely place for 'turning off'' the ATP check is with the schedule line category. A close second culprit is with the requirements class of the SO item. SD configuration will determine the default requirements type, requirements class, and the default Schedule line category. Study the sales orders in question in VA03. Specifically look at the requirements type (procurement tab of SO Item) and the Schedule line category (goto-item-schedule lines). Then, look at the configuration for
Schedule line category: OVZ8
Mapping of requirements type to requirements class : OVZH
Requirements class: OVZ0
Look at the setting for 'AvC'. If it is 'on', you will get ATP against product. If it is off, you will get either an ATP against planning, or no ATP at all.
If you wish to change the determination of the Requirements type, or the determination of the Schedule line category in SD, you should probably discuss with your local SD functional expert. A small change here can have many unintended consequences.
Best Regards,
DB49 -
ATP check and Check against planning for a production order
Hi
When I create a production order for some orders it is ATP check and for some orders it is showing 2 in type avail check is check against planning in coois screen. Because of this orders are gettign released even though BOM material is out of stock.Can I know in which situations the orders will come under the second scenario. I always want the orders should be in ATP check
regards,
PradeepM.Hi,
If you want only ATP check, then in MRP-3 view of the mtl master change the checking group to the same value as the one which you find to be following the ATP check.
However before making this change do consult your colleagues in other domains, as this will impact all places where Av. check is done.
Hope it clarifies.
Regards,
Vivek
Maybe you are looking for
-
I keep my itunes on two external harddrives. And I sync one or the other to my computer when changing up my playlists on my iPod. Well I usually download my music to my computer and then move it over to the harddrives and then I erase the music from
-
How do i Install Win 7 to an External HD
I have iMac 27" 3ghz Intel core 2 duo and love it! I am also a gamer and despise the fact that gaming studios don't make enough games for Macs. So I've tried using Win XP on my mac via boot-camp by dual booting but was not satisfied and didn't like h
-
Design mode doesn't show anything after import
I just installed Flash Builder 4 and selected a small project I was working with in Flex 3. It gave me a warning upgrading the directory which I did and loaded up the base .mxml file. I ran it and it worked ok. I then went into design mode to add
-
Hi, So I got a new CD (Thrice, yay!), and I went to listen to it. Popped it into my computer (MBP, Tiger, 2.16ghz, bought June 2007). I got one song into the CD, and it suddenly stopped. I figured that Itunes messed up. But then it wouldn't start aga
-
I trying to create a DG from a two node RAC instance. All the machines are at the same patch levels and OS levels (11.1.0.7/Solaris 2.10). Our GRID CONTROL is at 10.2.0.5 and patched to what I think is the latest level. The wizards works fine and the