TDS at the time of MIRO

Dear All,
I am done miro at that time my mistake i could not tag the TDS for the vendor now only i realised that i have to deduct the TDS to that vendor now the MM period is closed i cannot do the reversal and TDS i have to remittee with in 7th of next month. Is any solution for this
can you please answer me

Hi,
Use MMRV which will allow posting to previous period. Then make necessary transaction to include TDS entries. Enter Business Plance and Section Code without fail.
Regards,
Sadashivan

Similar Messages

System is taking Exchange Rate Value from PO at the time of MIRO

HI GURUS,
The problem is that the system is taking the value of exchange rate from PO when we are doing MIRO. We do not tick the field -fixed rate -in PO but still the system is taking the value of exchange rate from PO and not from the exchange rate maintained in OB08. In PO ,the value of exchange is rate is coming from the data maintained in OB08 but it becomes outdated by the time of MIRO. Please help.
Regards,
Mukesh

Hi Mukesh,
Please check mentioned conditions according SAP Note 128
Exchange rate differences between goods receipt and invoice receipt are posted under the following preconditions:
The invoice is posted in the same (foreign) currency as the purchase order.
The exchange rate in the purchase order is not fixed.
As a basic rule, an exchange rate difference is only posted as substitute for a price difference, that is, only in the case of stock material (standard price with variance or moving average price with stock shortage/undercoverage). The exchange rate difference results from the following calculation schema:
GR value in foreign currency at GR exchange rate
GR value in foreign currency at IR exchange rate
In the process, the quantity situation is of course taken into account. For example, in the case of IR before GR no exchange rate difference is posted, and in the case of "partial" invoices a proportional exchange rate difference is posted.
For cancelled invoices/credit memos, the following applies:
All invoices/credit memos/subsequent debits must be posted in the same (foreign) currency. (However, not necessarily in the PO currency). The exchange rate difference results from the following calculation schema:
Previous IR value in local currency at average exchange rate of previous invoices/credit memos/subsequent debits
IR value in local currency at exchange rate of present credit memo (in relation to the total quantity invoiced)
Here, too, an exchange rate difference is only posted as substitute for a price difference.
For delivery costs, exchange rate differences are posted to the stock account as long as stock coverage exists. No price difference lines are generated.
During the goods receipt no currency check is carried out and therefore, only the local currency is updated in the invoice.
Regards
Mani

At the time of MIRO against STO full qty for invoice is showing.

We have created STO for lumsum qty and then created OBD with PGI and GRN for breackup qty,but at the time of MIRO against STO full qty for invoice is showing ,and we want respective breakup qty in respect to OBD or GRN no. as reference.

Have you done PGI and GRN both for partial quantity ?
Can you show the screen shot for PO history and MIRO ?

UMB : Change in stock account hitting at the time of MIRO

Dear Experts ,
I have a material with a moving average price.
The material was taken in stock in initial entry. in period 10.
Then the material was consumed in period 11.
Further the material was procured . The posting period in GR was 11 & the period at the time of entry was 12.
Now the MIRO was done for the material . At the time of MIRO the material price was revised .
The MIRO entry date was in period 12 & the posting date was in period 11.
The entries for GR are :
1000     1     89          20501000     INV. OF RM          209,272.50     INR
1000     2     96          10601050     GR/IR CLEARING OTH.     209,272.50-     INR
Cenvat Postings are :
1000     1     40          21221004     EXCISE RG 23A HCESS      89.00      INR              00
1000     2     40          21221000     EXC RG 23A BED BAS       8,795.00     INR              00
1000     3     40          21221003     EXCISE RG 23A ECESS      178.00           INR              00
1000     4     50          10601230     CENVAT CLEARING            9,062.00-     INR               00
The MIRO Entries are :
1000     1     31          200173               XYZ VENDOR                           241,402.00-     INR     **
1000     2     86          10601050     GR/IR CLEARING OTH.           209,272.50     INR     25
1000     3     89          20501000     INV. OF RM                           11,572.50             INR     25
1000     4     40          10601230     CENVAT CLEARING                    9,062.00              INR     00
1000     5     40          21211000     INPUT ST BASIC 1001             362.20                INR
1000     6     40          21211001     INP ST EDUC.CESS1001           90.55             INR
1000     7     40          21201000     INPUT VAT                             8,833.80 INR     25
1000     8     40          21201001     ADDITONAL VAT                        2,208.45     INR     25
AND a separate accounting document is posted with the following entries :
1000     1     99          20501000     INV. OF RM                          9,985.50-     INR
1000     2     83          40101230     CHANGE REVALUATION       9,985.50     INR
Pls tell me why sould the material get revaluated ??? GL 40101230 is assigned to UMB.
Thanks in advance ..
Anis

Please tell me same issue i am getting.
System asking UMB key noit defined , we do not want to put in loss/gain from revaluation.
In one PO, we doing miro and at this time all matreial consumed in material master, there is no quantity and value.
In other PO, we doing miro for 32 quantity and at this time , 22 quantity present in material master and we getting this error .
But i do not understand , same scenario i checked in quality , it working.
please guide me
Thanks,
Dharmveer

TDS at the time of advance payment(urgent)

Dear all,
I have done the configuration of TDS at the time of invoice and payment. i checked. it is woking well both at the time of invoice and payment.
The issue is when i do the advance payment and when i click the withholding tax tab, it is not going into that tab and because of that tds at the time of downpayment is not getting deducted.
Since we have short time for golive i want to solve this issue urgently.
please guide me.
Will award full points.
Thanks & Regards,
A.Anandarajan.

Dear Friend,
First create the down payment request in F-47, then make the payment of this down payment request in F-53 or F-58 ( with special GL indicaator F)
That should resolve the issue.
Assign points if useful
regards
Venkatesh

Problem in VAT Calculation @ the time of MIRO

Dear All,
We are using the Tax Procedure TAXINN.
When we create a LIV document with ref to a PO using the transaction MIRO & when I check the calculate tax button, the tax amount which is displayed in the Basic data is more than the amount which is displayed in the taxes tab.
For Ex:
Created a PO with the following details.
Total Qty in PO - 10
Base Price - 1000/qty.
BED - 14% - 1400.00
ECS - 2% - 28.00
VAT - 4% - (4% on 11428) - 457.12
So my total Tax = 1885.12 (Including Excise & VAT).
Now when I create a MIRO document the tax amount which gets calculated when I check the Calculate button is 1885.12 (Same as above) in the Taxes tab of MIRO.
But the tax amount which is displayed in the Basic data tab is 1,942.24
Also when I simulated the MIRO entrys the VAT amount which was simulated was - 514.24 & not 457.12 as in PO.
Can anyone please advice on the reason for this mismatch in VAT calculation during the time of MIRO?
Is there any specific settings for VAT in TAXINN ??
Note :
The Excise & VAT are calculated correctly during the time of PO creation. Also I havent maintained any additional VAT condition types for my VAT in the tax procedure.
Awaiting helpful replies.
Regards,
Edited by: SAP FC on Dec 5, 2008 3:44 PM

Hi All,
Please note that when I removed the VAT condition type JVRD from the Classify condition types settings in IMG then the VAT amount which is calculated in the Basic data tab of MIRO is equal to the actual Tax amount as in PO (Excise + VAT ), but the amount which is displayed in the tax tab of MIRO is less.
Now if I maintain the Classify condition types settings in IMG for my VAT condtn type JVRD then the VAT amount which is calculated in basic data is more than both the PO as well as tax tab in MIRO.
Please note as you all have suggested I tried this after creating a new material & with the newly maintained condition records in FV11.
But still the issue persists..
If anyone have any idea. plz revert.
Regards,
Edited by: SAP FC on Dec 9, 2008 10:23 AM

Accounting Entries at the time of MIRO

Dear All,
Please help me to map the following scenario.
Co code A and co code B are assigned to the one company.
Now co code A sends the PO the co code B. Co code B will do IV.
Now client wants at the time of MIRO in co code B normal (Standard) entry should pass in co code B Plus he wants to pass the entry which will debit A/R in code A.
How it is possible?
Thanks & Regards,
Reva.

Hi
Create settings at TCode OBYA.
Cheers
Srinivas

Error at the time of MIRO

Dear All,
Error at the time of MIRO while doing invoice for customs and the error showing as Tax code VO country IN does not exist in procedure ZAXINN
VO i maintained for Non Taxable transactions and Imports PO wont have any tax procedure as pricing procure is defined in MM Route only.
Please suggest me why this error is comming
Thanks,
Tiru

hi
check u r tax code rates if ur using tax inj process
or maintain rates in FV11
Create a condition record by T.code FV11 for any of the condition record in your tax procedure TAXINN and check that tax code in header and line item should be same.
Also use T.Code: OBBG and assign ur tax procedure with ur county code and save. Now try ur transaction.
also check
SPRO-LOGISTIC GENERAL - TAX ON GOODS MOVEMENT- INDIA - BASIC SETTINGS - DETERMINATION OF EXCISE DUTY - CONDITION BASED EXCISE DETERMINATION - ASSIGN TAX CODE TO COMPANY CODE.
Check in SPro > materials Management > LIV > default values for tax code > give u r company code and try
reward if helpful
regards
kunal

TDS at the time of MIGO

Hi all
In our situation, we have some vendors who are both material as well as service providers.Our client wants to have the functionality of deducting/specifying the tax codes for EWT at the time of MIGO itself and not at MIRO since the person doing MIRO might make a mistake regarding TDS. Is there any way we can handle the situation or do we have to create two codes for all such vendors. We are working on ECC 6.0.(India, CIN Version)

I agree with Kapil Malde
Income tax provisions are very clear on the issue that the TDS to be deducted when expense is booked and credit account could be a clearing account(instead of a vendor account).Hence TDS to be deducted on MIGO and not MIRO.
Also at the time of MIGO the Purchase order details are available in the system hence vendor name is already available in system hence technically TDS can be deducted at the time of MIGO Itself.
(As a side note I would like to mention the SAP Logic of not providing the facility of TDS deduction at MIGO stage is that as a standard procedure MIGO and MIRO should be done on the same day, hence it make no difference but in actual practice there is gap in migo and miro hence legality of transaction can be challenged by Taxation Authorities.)
In case there is change in tax rate then practice of deducting tax at MIRO stage would amount to over deduction of TDS or under deduction of tds during the period of GAP.

Regarding Tds at the time of down payment

Hi All,
At the time of down payment we are deducting the TDS for the vendor,
and at the time of invoice we are deducting TDS only to the extent of the balance amount outstanding (invoice amt - downpayment amt).
After this we are clearing the downpayment made to the invoice raised with trax. F-54.
when we are making outgoing payment to the vendor, the TDS amount which is deducted at the time of Down payment is also being debited (here the down payment amount is fully credited and the TDS amount at the time of downpayment is getting debited).
Any how the amount is correct but there will be a open item created in the TDS account and at the time of making payment to the bank for TDS this will come as a open item (j1inchln).
This will create unnecessary balance in the GL accounts.
Please Advice what to be done.
Regards

payment related all tax types deselect the radio button of central invoice prop. and select No central inv. under central invoice tab
then it will not reverse the tds entries at the time of f-53/f-58
assign points if useful
Edited by: Sai Krishna Vallurupalli on Jul 1, 2008 1:05 PM

SAP not making Controlling Document at the time of MIRO

Dear Guru!
I have a very peculiar problem which I believe is an error in SAP.
My problem is that at the time of implemenation of MM the company doesnt have a store. so company ask the consultant to override GRN process and process everything through invoice and all the stock will be charged out to a cost center.
Now when the invoice of Cost Center (MIRO w/o GRN) is process, SAP doesnt create a controlling document and because there is no controlling document, the company cannot get the cost wise detail.
Now my question is, if I cannot get a cost center wise data, how can I get that entry. Can I do any entry to get that data or what should be a solution I can tell to my company.
Regards
Shah

Hi,
First of all the Controlling Mudule have to be activated. Now you are charging all your stock to cost center, so first of all you will have to use the Account Assignment Category K in Purchase Order. Yoou will also have to configure the Account Assignment Category in configuration. You can configure it via OME9. In this setting, Set the only Invoice Reciept Indicator, because you are not making MIGO Docs.
Now another condition is, you will have to charge all your stock to particular one GL Account so you will make the Cost Element for that GL as Cost Element Category 1. Now that Cost Element have to be assigned to OKB9 and cost center will be assigned there. Do not tick Profitibilty Segment because you are not going to create the document for COPA. So this is the general configuration for Creating CO Document.
Main thing is, you must check the Controlling Area Settings twise.
I hope it found useful to you.
Regards,
Jigar

Problem at the time of Cal. of Service Tax at the time of MIRO

Hello,
When we are running MIRO, at that time system is calculating wrong amount of Service Tax against clearing agent Invoice verification.
In that if we change the Quantity to 0.001 unit then system will calculate right amount of service tax.
In OBYC Tcode we have maintaine Transaction ZCA for Clearing Agent. But when we see in the Table T030A - Transaction Keys and assignment to Groups, Transaction ZCA is not there.
How can i assign the Transaction ZCA to this table ?
CAn anyone help me ?
Ragards,
SAN2008

CAn any one solve this problem ?
Ragards,
SAN2008

Exchange rate problem at the time of MIRO

Dear all
Po is created for 21,00,000 EA qty with rate of 1 USD=44.22130 INR
GR done for QTY 7,00,000 EA qty and Invoiced received for 7,00,000 qty at the rate of 1usd=43.2 Inr, now if i m trying to invoice almost 80,00 usd we are paying more im tring to chnage in MIRO t.code in details tab Exchange rate but it was in Display (greyed) how can i change the exchange rate for this amount or how can i post the Invoice...
Please advice me.
Regards
venu gopal

Hi,
If you have not checked the indicator 'Exch Rate Fixed' indicator in PO header tab 'Delivery/Invoice', then you can change the exchage rate at MIRO.
For this, follow the steps below in their exact sequence.
1. go to MIRO
2. Enter the 'invoice date' in Basic data tab
3. Go to 'Details' tab in invoice header. Enter the desired exchage rate here.
Now proceed further and allocate the invoice to the desired PO or del note etc...
You will not be able to change the exchange rate once the invoice has been allocated.
rewards if helpful..

While simulating at the time of MIRO

Dear Friends
Please explain how to resolve the following case.
In Migo there are 5 line items with freight charges.
While doing MIRO with reference to PO- with Goods/ Service Items+Planned Delivery Cost , and entering Invoice Date, Amount, Business Area,
Check on Calculate Tax Button,( Automatically Tax Amount Picking)
Problem is that After simulating only 2 line items are picking balance 3 line items and 3 line items of Freight charges are not picking. Balance amount also showing.
and TAX AMOUNT FIELD also disappearing.
Please help me out how to resolve this issue.
Thanks and Regards
nirmal sitaram

Hi Prashant
Thanks for your reply.
No there are no cancellations and return deliveries.
Thanks and Rgards
Nirmal sitaram

Internal Order Budget exceeded error at the time of MIRO

Internal Order 45000147 having total budget 1036144.57 and Payment done so far is 73640.00
There are service purchase orders (66003816 & 17 only MIRO no MIGO)exists for same internal order of Rs 9, 25,000.
We want to book MIRO against internal order of values approx 525000 but system is showing budget is exceeded as error message and we configured the tolerence as 100% if it cross 100 % then ti should give error message.

Hi,
is the amount 73640.00 shown as the assigned value in the active availability control? You could check this with the report BPFCTRA1 in SE38. If you enter '=SUM' in the OK-Code and press enter after execution of the report, a pop-up will appear if there are inconsisitent values. If no pop-up appears the assigned value displayed in BPFCTRA1 is correct.
178837 explains how the assigned value for internal orders is calculated.
Regards,
Greta

TDS at the time of MIRO

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for