TDS on downpayment to Vendors not reversed

Hi
I made downpayment to vendor of Rs.10000 and TDS was deducted of Rs.224
Afterwards i booked invoice of Rs.50000 and TDS was deducted of Rs.1120
When i did F-54, TDS deducted at the start must be reversed. However it did not got reversed.
I have selected "Central Inv. Prop" in WHT Code for payment. Inspite of this TDS is not reversed.
What could be other reason.

Please can you try the SAP Note 1427066

Similar Messages

TDS not reversed at the time of clearing Vendor after down payment is made

Dear SAP Gurus,
I have a problem in Withholding tax. I have made a down payment and tax is deducted on that.
Then I raised an invoice on which tax is deducted.
Now I am trying to clear a part of the amount in which I have raised an invoice and the TDS is not getting reversed.
Can someone help me please.
1) I have checked the "central invoice proportionately" in WHT type for payment posting.
2) The TDS on the invoice has not been paid.
I am getting the problem with this vendor only.
Regards,
Hari

Hi,
You have to assign TDS tax codes at the time of payment as well as at the time of invoice in vendor master.
when you are making down payment TDS should be deducted on the down payment amount (base value)
at the time of payment
say Rs5000/- you are making down payment ..........now tds is deducted on 5000/- and bill value is 60000/-
Now you are creating an invoice with FB60 or MIRO , you chage the TDS base value (bill value- down payment)=(60000-5000)=55000/- and assigned to TDS code (at the time of Invoice ) and make TDS base value as Zero against the TDS TAX codes (at the time of payment) and simulate it and post it so that TDS will be deducted on Rest of the amount i.e 55000/-
for checking , you can manually calculate TDS on 60000/- =(tds on 5000+ tds on 55000/-)
now you clear The down payment against the Invoice.
with Regards,
Sudipto

TDS AMOUNT CAN NOT REVERSED THROUGH MR8M

Dear Gurus,
Through MIRO TDS deducted but when i reverse the same document through MR8M TDS amount can not reversed that amount credited to vendor account.
NO LINE ITEM CREATED FOR TDS REVERSED ENTRY.
Please do the needfull.
Regards,
MAHESH K SINGH
*assign full marks

Hi,
You need to check the MIRO (LIV) Invoice Date and the Date of TDS payment.
If you have open Invoice in Vendor Account and the TDS is paid for the Month....... then with such exceptional cases, your TDS amount will not be reversed as the TDS is already paid.
Assign point, if useful
Regards
Sandeep

Tds is not reversing in transaction code F-54

Hi Experts
I am facing one problem please help me
I have created on down payment in that down payment I deducted the tds
after that i booked miro i booked miro with same value which was exsist in
down payment &deduct the tds when i am going to clear that down payment
against that invoice system is adjusting only basic line item it is not reversing that
tds amount.
I checked in all docs business place & section code is updated
please help me
regards
nitin shukla

Hi Madhu
thanks again for your time
Entry is like this
397,080.00-SUNDRY CREDITORS FOR
400,000.00 GR/IR-SERVICES
41,200.00 Services for Projor
44,120.00- TDS PAYABLE - 194J
When i am going to clear this F-54 partially system is not reversing TDS
Please suggest me
Regards
Nitin

TDS : on Downpayment

Hello Experts,
TDS on Invoice has been configured & calculated correct, thanx to all your help & guidance.
The vendor on which i m trying has already crossed limits & surcharge is now applicable to him.
but now when i m trying to post a downpayment, i cant find surcharge NOT getting calculated. however, surcharge is getting deducted automatically in the invoice side.
it seems that for surcharge on downpayment will be applicable only if the limits are exceeded in downpayments too. do you have any solution, if i want surcharge to be calculated, irrespective whether the limits has been crossed in Invoice or Downpayment.

Dear Hussein
As per SAP Std Procedure you have created two different w/tax code each for invoice & payment. So, if you maintain the formula for surcharge in both cases, they will accumulate the basic amt with a combination of Vendor & w/tax code.
The solution for this situation could be you should not maintain formula for surcharge in case of downpayment and thus surcharge will be calculated in each cases. This could be useful even if the vendor invoices doesnot crosses the particular limit. As surcharge will be deducted at the time of downpayment but when invoice is received then you do the clearing through F-44 then if surcharge is not applicable due to limit crossing then it will be reversed otherwise will be adjusted against the Invoice.
Thus in case of downpayment you should not maiintain formula for surcharge and should directly apply the rate.
Hope it helps
Cheers
IMK

Delivery costs not reversed in GR reversal

Hi,
I have a situation where in PO following conditions are used-
ZR0 - (100) USD - Statistical - Accrual - Discount/Surcharge type
ZR2 - (100) USD - Statistical - Accrual - Discount/Surcharge type - Delivery cost - (100% of ZR0)
ZR3 - (-100) USD - Statistical - Accrual - Discount/Surcharge type - (-100% of ZR0)
When I post the GR, the following entries are posted-
148000    CAInv NonTradStock S   30,421.60 AUD
311700    CLPbls GR-IR Clearin   64,991.68- AUD
629935    Std-Actual Price Var   34,570.08 AUD
611900    Purchasing (FG)        64,991.68 AUD
611910    Purchase offset (FG)   64,991.68- AUD
311700    CLPbls GR-IR Clearin   14,504.64- AUD (ZR0)
120240    CARecv Sundry-Extern   14,504.64 AUD
311700    CLPbls GR-IR Clearin   14,504.64 AUD (ZR2)
311700    CLPbls GR-IR Clearin   14,504.64- AUD (ZR3)
But when I reverse the GR, the following entries only are posted-
99 148000    CAInv NonTradStock S   32,653.56- AUD
86 311700    CLPbls GR-IR Clearin   64,991.68 AUD
96 629935    Std-Actual Price Var   32,338.12- AUD
50 611900    Purchasing (FG)        64,991.68- AUD
40 611910    Purchase offset (FG)   64,991.68 AUD
Can you please let me know why the ZR0/ZR2/ZR3 cond are not reversed in the 102 movement?

Hello Jurgen,
I am cancelling the initial material document (101) with MIGO - 102.
When I check the accounting documents:
For the 101:
001 89       311010     STK RAW MAT                                   18,219.00
002 96       408111     UNVOUCH A/P RAW MAT                           11,489.81-
003 86       601120     PURCHASES RAW MAT (O                             548.57
004 50       408113     UNVOUCH A/P TRANSP                             6,384.00-
005 50       408113     UNVOUCH A/P TRANSP                               893.76-
For the 102:
Itm PK BusA Acct no.   Description                    Tx     Amount in   USD
001 99       311010     STK RAW MAT                                   18,219.00-
002 86       408111     UNVOUCH A/P RAW MAT                           11,489.81
003 86       601120     PURCHASES RAW MAT (O                             345.19
004 40       408113     UNVOUCH A/P TRANSP                             6,384.00
There were several goods receipts between 101 and 102 (but no invoicing) because this is an automated flow with EDI.
The PO has 2 freight condition types:
FRC1 (freight/qty) with vendor A in the details of the conditions on the PO
FRA3 (freight %) with vendor B in the details of the conditions on the PO
For different reasons, the pricing is maintained in MEK1 (not in an info-record).
Thanks for your help,
Annabelle R.

TDS liability line items are not picking in u2013 J1INCHLN

Hi Experts
During depositing of TDS through J1INCHLN it is not picking all line items i.e. available in Ledger (FBL3N). We came to know after reconciliation even as all line items are available in table With_item as uncleared.
We are facing this problem as the data from 01.03.2009u2026. Previously everything was working fine.
One more thing I will stress here that we have started Purchase Order based invoice verification also from this period.
Pl help ASAP.
Regards
Kuldeep Dubey

check the line of TDS is having the Business Place, if the business place is not capturng in TDS line items , then the create the substitution for Business Place & Section Code.
without business place in TDS line items you can't make the TDS payment.
Regards
Akmal

Billing document not reversed

Dear Guru's
I am not SAP consultant.
Pls help me, previously i had reversed one billing document through Vf11 ,then reversed VL09 delivery and cancelled the Sales order.But now billing document not reversed.Again go to reverse throuh VF11 Getting error as No billing documents were generated. See log
Message no. VF032
Swamy

Hi malaini,
thanks for your's reply.in this regards already i had reversed particular delivery , also sales order and deleted.But only think is now stock was not reversed and billing & accounting posting didn't reversed.customer balance is shown debit wrongly.pls advice.
Swamy.

Excise duty not reversed even after Excise Invoice is reversed

Hi Experts,
Please give me solution for excise Inv. no 1000200212 dt. 06.09.10 has been reversed in the Sap in J2IUN report ,the excise duty against Inv no 10000200212 is not reversed & is reflected in duty payble amount. At the same time stock of the Inv. no. 1000200212 has been reversed in the stock ledger.
The cancell invoice should not appear for duty payment statement in the J2IUN.
Rgds
Shailesh W

Hello Sir,
I will provide u further details for this Issue.
This is to inform you that excise Inv. no 1000200212 dt. 06.09.10 has been reversed in the Sap & fresh Inv no 1000200214 dt. 06.09.10 is prepared .We have noticed that in J2IUN report ,the excise duty against Inv no 10000200212 is not reversed & is refected in duty payble amount. At the same time stock of the Inv. no. 1000200212 has been reversed in the stock ledger.
As per our understanding,the cancell invoice should not appear for duty payment statement in the J2IUN.
You are requested to check the same at your end and let us know the reason for the same.
We are post the excise document in month of april 10 vid doc. no.10000021 dt. 02.04.10 7 10000057 dt. 10/04/10 and same is reversed vide do. no 1000074 dt. 02/04/10 & 25000003 .
While arriving the duty payble amount, we are found following discrepancy in J2IUN (Z-Report) & FBL3N (G.L) Account
Duty payble fig. As per J2IUN Rs. 9482.00 (Basic)
Duty Payable Fig. As per FBL3N Rs. 7247.00 (Basic)
Diff. Rs. 2235.00
The diff. due to reversal of excise posting document not a/cted in J2IUN Report.
Rgds
Shailesh W

Purchase order Budget not reversed while doing MIRO

Hi,
Here, we are using funds management for budget analysis with update profile 350 and other setting tick on Goods Receipt only. while doing PR/PO it is coming to commitment budget. Goods Receipt no FM document created.
Strange behavior of system is , while doing MIRO system is not reversing PO budget and updated double consumed in commitment item.
Thanks and Regards
Kaushal shah

Hi,
If you have only GR ticked in OFUP, why would you expect MIRO to have an impact on PO's commitment? As for the fact, that GR document does not create FM posting, you have to check FM assignment of GR and make sure that commitment items are duly defined.
Regards,
Eli

Vendor not intended when create SC using create limit item

Hi All,
This is a challenging issue for all of us...
SRM : 5.0
ECC : 6.0
I am facing the problem when creating the Shopping cart..
When i click on Centralized purchasing -- > Shop -- > Create Limit item
and give the Desc, Product category, Value limit, Expected value, Date between, Supplier and Follow-up actions as Confirmation and Invoice and account assignment as Known and click add to shopping cart..
It is giving a message vendor not intended for purchaing org.. in the Item under Good/Service field value LIMIT is getting created automatically.. I dont understand how it is getting created..
If i try to create one more item and specify the Good/service as our custom field value , for this item there are no error and
no message saying Vendor not intended for Purchasing organization..
Please help me in finding out the issue.So that will be greatful to you..
Advanced thanks
Points will be rewarded..
Regards
Raju

Hi Teja,
I agree with you answer..
When i tryo to create SC using the Product which are repliacted from ECC to SRM.. I am able to create SC successfully. That means vendor is properly intended to the Porg and Pgrp right...
When i click on Centralized purchasing -- > Shop -- > Create Limit item
and give the Desc, Product category, Value limit, Expected value, Date between, Supplier and Follow-up actions as Confirmation and Invoice and account assignment as Known and click add to shopping cart..
It is giving a message vendor not intended for purchaing org.. in the Item under Good/Service field value LIMIT is getting created automatically.. I dont understand how it is getting created and Product type is neither a Material nor service.. The product type field vale is blank....
Please help me in finding out the issue.So that will be greatful to you..
REgards
Kumar

Downpayment to Vendors using F110

Hi ,
We are trying to do downpayment to vendors using F110. During posting of downpayment request we gave the target special gl indiactor as " E" (with which the downpayment should be posted), but during the payment run, system is posting to alternative recon accounts given for indicator "A" .
why system is trying to post to accounts of indicator "A' even though we gave indicator "e " during payment request.
Thanks,

Hi Monica,
For that go through t.code FBZP and select all company codes button (first one) T.code OBVUthere select company code(details)
there Sp. G/L transactions to be paid give whichone you have to give like F ,E&A.....under vendor
Ofter that system will give payment request through E
This is information is useful to you
If u have any doubt feel free to ask
Regards
Surya
Edited by: surya steria on Sep 15, 2008 6:18 AM

GR amount not reversed

Hi! I have a PO with GR and IR. But since the IR was posted last year, we couldnt reverse it so we just had a Credit memo for it. Now looking at the PO history tab, the IR is still there and not reversed, and under it is a SD-L Credit Memo with quantity and amount negative. Now we're trying to reverse the GR, but only the quantity was reversed. The amount was still there. The 102 amount is zero, therefore it's still there in the total amount of the GR. How can we remove this? We want to reverse the amount of GR as well. thanks in advance!
Moderator message: Thread locked because the question was already asked by you in this thread:
http://forums.sdn.sap.com/message.jspa?messageID=11116971#11116971
.Please read and follow the forum rules
Edited by: Jürgen L. on Feb 24, 2012 10:23 AM

Are you able to see once you reversed the GR document and GR/IR balance in MR11 transaction.If it is not there ignore the price in PO .In reversal document are you able to see any accountimng document ?.Check is there any amount.

Vendor not inteded for Purch. Org.

Dear all,
in ECS SRM 5.0 I am facing an error with some PO:
In transaction process PO (BBP_POC) I can not create a PO due to the message and PO remains in status held: Vendor not intended for purchase organisation XXX
In fact the error message is correct as the vendor is not open for this purchase organization. But even if I change PORG and PRGRP to the good organisations for which the vendor is open, I still get the same error message. The new selected purchase organization and group is not taken into account.
If I check the relevant tables with BBP_PD, the good purchase organization and group is stored.
Some idea?
Thanks in advance
AD

hi,
You have to maintain P.Org data for the vendor in "Manage Business Partners".
In the change mode, maintain P.Org in Vendor Data Tab.Also you have to link the vendor with the backend (R/3) vendor.
In the "Vendor Data" tab of the Manage Business Partners there is Vendor Purchasing Data where you maintain P.Org, P.O Currency etc and Link to Back end system where you maintain the back end logical system and the corresponding back end Vendor who is responsible.
See these related threads for more pointers:
SAP OSS Note 1026168 - Vendor &1 not intended for purch. org. &2
Error vendor is not intended for p org
Vendor Not intended for Purchasing org.
BR,
Disha.
Do reward points for useful answers.

Cross company code reversal of an asset document does not reverse all docs

hi,
i have reversed a cross company code document which has posted to 2 different assets in 2 different companies. when i reversed this cross company code document, the system reversed only the first document in the first company and it does not reverse the second document in the second company. It says the second document cannot be reversed with the simple information message.
how can we solve this?

Hi,
can you check if SAP note 1273856 solves your problem?
Regards,
Markus

TDS on downpayment to Vendors not reversed

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for