Toggle checkbox by code not taken in consideration - cProjects

Hi experts,
I encounter some problems while trying to change the state of a chackbox by code.
The checkbox appeared well chechek on the screen but is not considered checked by the program.
I tried to trigger the event manually but without any success. I encounter difficulties to fill the event parameters with datas.
Any help or advice would be really appreciate as i already spent my all day on this...
Thanks a lot in advance.
Sébastien.

Hi Experts,
I finally found how to do this.
You can notify a change in context this way:
DATA: lr_context      TYPE REF TO if_wd_context,
lv_entry_added TYPE        wdy_boolean.
lr_context = wd_context->get_context( ).
lv_entry_added = lr_context->add_context_attribute_change(
element               = lo_el_viewdata
attribute_name        = 'ROLE_MATCHING'
new_value             = lv_role_matching
delegate_to_original = 'X'
force_entry           = 'X' ).
" Trigger Change manager
cl_dpr_ui_event_source=>start_report_change_events(
wd_comp_controller ).
I hope it would help.
Regards,
Sébastien

Similar Messages

Call list: calling hours not taken into consideration

Hi Gurus,
I have a question. We are using CRM 7.0 EHP1, and especially marketing functionality.
We are generating call lists from a marketing campaign. What we see is that the customer calling hours are not taken into consideration when creating the call list.
However, if we create the call list the "old-fashioned" way (using CRMD_CALL_LIST), we have the option "scheduling... based on calling hours".
How can I achieve that calling hours are also considered when creating the call list from the campaign?
Is there a customizing setting, or do I need to activate a BAdi?
thanks.
regards,
Wim Olieman

Also, keep in mind that MRP calculates availability of inspection stock in two ways.
Before an inspection lot is created, (i.e. a purchase order or production order is out there and planned already, MRP uses the expected GR date plus the Avg. GR days on the main QM view for the material to determine the availability date.
Once the inspection lot is created however, MRP uses the end date of the inspection lot which is the lot creation date plus the avg insp. duration in the inspection type setup in the material master. This can result in some minor differences if you aren't careful in setting your various fields in the material master.
If a material is going to reside in QI for an extended time, the lab should use QA02 to modify the end date of the inspection lot.
FF

Taxes not taken into consideration on consignment items

We are having an issue when we are transacting consignment material from consignment to unrestricted inventory. When the movement 411K is used no taxes are transacted causing an issue with our moving average price (MAP). When a purchase order (PO) is received into unrestricted from a regular PO using a 101 movement type taxes are taken into consideration and applied to the MAP. If we do the same with a consignment PO is used the material is transacted to consignment stock and no taxes are considered then when the material is moved to unrestricted, as pointed out above, using a 411K no taxes are taken into consideration causing the MAP to be understated.
Has anyone else seen this issue and if so what was done to alleviate the problem.

Hi Amit,
Thank you very much for your response. Yes, I understand this portion of the issue that IM does not take tax into consideration. Our problem is that when the materials are received into inventory via a consignment PO taxes are never considered and posted to our moving average price. Taxes are only considered at invoicing or settlement time and never posted properly to the material. Then a manual posting must take place to clear the imbalance. Does this make sense?
Thank you for your time.
Best regards,
Steve

User password not taken in consideration after a company copy

Hi All,
After a company copy, user passwords are not replicated; we´re only able to connect with manager and then reset all passwords.
Is there anything to do to avoid this?
Thanks!

Hi.
When you use the Copy Express function, it copies data from one database to another.
I also do believe that when using Copy Express, all passwords for users are reset and needs to be added manually before entering the new company for the first time.
Kind Regards,
Runar Wigestrand.

Sales order stock not taken into consideration when GR is posted.

Hello All,
I had a scenario in which, I have created a MTO sales order. I have created a PO from the PR. I did the GR for the PO quantity.
The plant and storage location are warehouse managed.(The storage location is HU managed)
I created an inbound delivery and then TO finally posted the GR for the same quantity as in the sales order and PO. After this I posted the sales order stock into scrapping through t.code VLMOVE.
Now I want the stock back. So I did a 552 with transaction code MB1A to the same plant and storage location against the sales order and the line item. This created an inbound delivery as the storage locaion is HU managed.
I created a TO from inbound delivery. Now the HU and the TO both have the sales order reference and spcial stock type "E".
But when I did PGR(Goods receipt) the system posts the stock in unrestircted use stock in IM side. Now there is a discrepancy in the stock in IM & WM.
In WM side the stock is in sales order stock but in IM side the stock is in unrestricted use.
I am wondering why during goods receipt the system is changing stock category from "E" to unrestricted.
Can any one help?
Regards,
Sushanta

you should have used movement type 552 E rather then using 552
and even if you have used 552 then you transfer the stock to sales order stock from own stock
follow the steps
1. use tcode MB1B
2. movement type 412 E

SO will not be taken into consideration for MRP until it is released for delivery.

Dear Sir,
We are following sales order basis planning (MTO basis planning strategy 50 is being used ).
When sales order are created by default it is blocked for delivery. In our present system, we have a scheduled total MRP procedure on daily basis. Hence, when sales are entered in the system it is taken into consideration for MRP RUN automatically.
But our new proposed system we want , until the sales order is blocked for delivery, it will not be considered for MRP RUN. It will only be taken into consideration for MRP RUN when sales order will be released for delivery.
Is it Possible ? If Yes, Please let me know the procedure.
Regards,
Amit Biswas

Hi Krishnendu ,
Then we are deviating from my requirement ,
My requirement >>
We are using MTO planning (Planning Strategy using 50),
1. Sales order are created for material requirement planning .
2. under MD04 list sales order will be shown under FERT material .
3. There is release procedure of Sales order.
4. Daily scheduled MRP RUN has been introduced on total planning.
5. MRP RUN only consider released sales order . If there is any sales order which is not released , that will not be consider for MRP RUN.
6. Under FERT material , there may be number of sales order both released and not released sales order.
Please let me know the process , sales order which are not released , this will not be under the scope of MRP RUN .
Regards,
Amit Biswas

JTable containing checkbox column is not getting updated

My application has a JTable and the first column is made up of checkboxes I have added a mouse listener for this table and implementd mousePressed(MouseEvent) method also. So when the user presses the mouse on these checkboxes I will update my loca data structure. Now the problem is this, when the user presses and drags the mouse to some other place(out of the current cell) then the table is not getting updated(the cell is not changing its value). But my local data structure is getting updated as the event is already fired. Please suggest me a solution for this.
Thanks in advance
Varun

thanks for your information. Actually I have seen this tutorial before but I think my case is little different. Sorry for not explaining it completely. My table has got a checkbox column header and another checkbox which is not part of the table. The second column in the table contains a user object. User can select rows by clicking on the checkbox header (select all rows/ deselect all rows), by clicking on individual cells or by clicking on the third checkbox provided for a specific purpose. So whenever the user does this "selection" operation I update one member variable in the user object which is in the second column. I tried putting my code in the setValueAt() method of my table model but couldn't make it work because of my lack of experience in swing or programming. So please tell me whether what you have suggested is valid or not. I added a mouse listener because there was a requirement to show some information to the user when he do a double click on one column of the table.

FI-AP Tax Code not considering the excise duty while calcuating the VAT

Sub: A/P Tax Code not considering the excise duty while calcuating the VAT
Hi Frnds.
I have a typical problem.
Till now we are using a "W6" as a tax code, where Excise-10%, Ed Cess-2%, SEd Cess-1% and VAT-4%.
But as the Govt. rules changed I have created a new tax code "W8" by copying the W6 and modified the VAT to 5% by changing the condition record JVRD.
The new tax code is not calculating VAT part correctly. It is taxing into consideration Invoice Base value, Ed Cess & SEd Cess (Omiting the Excise Duty).
I have checked my Tax Procedure, there everything is fine. Even my old tax code "W6" is working correctly.
Let me know where the error lies.
Here is the scenario
00. Tax code                       -   W6   -   W8   - Current Staus of W8
01. Invoice Base               - 355181 - 351798 - 353324 (by SAP Document Simulation View)
02. Excise @ 10% on 01.        - 35518 - 35180 - 35332
03. Ed Cess @ 2% on 01.        -    710 -    704 -    707
04. SEd Cess @ 1% on 01.       -    355 -    352 -    353
05. VAT @ 4% on (010203+04) - 15671 -   0     - 0
05.    VAT @ 5% on (010203+04) -    0    - 19401 - 0
05.     VAT @ 5% on (010304)     -   0     -    0    - 17719
INVOICE TOTAL VALUE            - 407435 - 407435 - 407435
Pls. let me know how to come over the issue.
By the way I am using the above tax code at FB60 transaction code.
Regards
Krishna
Edited by: Gopi Krishna Gutti on Oct 17, 2011 10:18 AM

Hi Vivek
Acutually we planned to implement SAP - FI & MM Modules only, and all the configuration is done in the system, but at the final stage our management is not satisfied with MM area, so finally we have gone live with only FI Moudle.
By the way thankyou for the reply. I have maintained 100% in JMX1 for the new tax code and it is working fine.
I will give you full points.
Once again thanks a lot.
Regards
Krishna

Profit Center is not taken from Material Master

Dear all,
When we post material-related items from SD or MM with link to material/plant (as additional account assginment) then Profit Center is taken from Material Master. But when I manually (FB01 or even FBR2) post similar item with link to material/plant (as additional account assginment) then Profit Center is not taken from Material Master.
Why this happen? How to fix it? We need to derive Profit Centers from Material Master for items that have links to material and posted via FI.

>
Jigar Thakkar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It will also take effect in FI, as we have defined the same. Status will be 3 (Other transactions + cross-company (orders + billing doc.) for Subsitution in T code 0KEL
>
> Regards,
> Jigar
Just checked this. It's not worked. This subst. not even called (I've checked w/ active Trace).
So, the question is still open. How to derive PCtr from material in manual FI (FB01, FBR2) transactions.

While MRp run which time is taken into consideration(from PIR or from MM)

Hi PP gurus,
When we run MRP which time is taken into consideration for a bought out material :
From Material Master ( Planned delivery time)
or
From Purchase Info record : the delivery time mentioned in the PIR ..
In my case the MRp run is showing 2 different results in different systems for the same material.
Also please let me know that if there is any priority that can be set in SPRO for picking up the time while MRP run and what takes priority and when.

Hi!,
If you are getting two different values after MRP in two different systems then please check:
1. whether any other info record exist for the same material in any of the system.
2. Have you maintained source list in both the systems for the material. How many sources are defined in the source list and in what sequence. If you have not maintained a quota arrangement then system will take first line item of the source list.
You can't set the priority for the planned delivery time but you can set whether system should take planned delivery time from info record or not in IMG setting Material Management > Consumption based Planning > Planning > Procurement Proposals > Define External Procurement. To use the planned delivery time from info record you must maintain a source list for that material with same vendor. Also make that source as MRP relevant.
Regards,
Uday

Requested action not taken: message refused

Hello,
I get the following error message:
ibs-mail.domain.local #5.7.1 smtp;550 5.7.1 Requested action not taken: message refused
where i can send out emails, but not recieve.
Any help is truly appreciated
K Amro

5.7.1 is a standard SMTP error code for an unauthorized delivery. I suspect you either have a filter that is blocking too much mail, or you may have an account problem with your BIS account and need to contact your carrier.
posted by DigitalFrog
WARNING: May contain traces of nuts.

BBP: Items not taken into BBP after VAT change

Hello,
I am new in FI-CA and I am facing one issue.
1. We changed VAT from 01.01.2011 by creating new VAT code
2. We are using BBP procedure 2 - with 11 due dates
3. In the amount of the BBP were taken only the items from the old VAT code.
The posting items with new VAT code from the billing document were not taken into budget billing plan.
Any advice where to look to find out problem?
Thanks in advance.
Vlado

hello Amlan,
We have tested these steps
1. The dunning procedure releases as an activity the documents that reach a certain dunning level.
2. The items are submitted to the collection agency using FP03D
3. The users manually recall some of these documents
5. Execute FPCI and like this the recall is included in the file.
If we do the previous everything works fine,but I believe the standard SAP is missing something for cancel release cases, because an inconsisty is being created between SAP and the collection agency. If you are reseting something a notice for the collection agencies would have to be created.
On top of that we cannot exclude recalled items (09) in the selection of FP03D (or FP03DM), because we also have systematic recalls that are done according to the longevity of the documents and according to that longevity placed in different collection agencies.
Do you think this can be reported to SAP as an error? The system in any case should prevent you to do the cancel release if the record is not still in any update file (table dfkkcoli_log) to prevent the inconsistency. Just like the system does not allow you to do the cancel release if the item has not been recall first.
Regards,
Sergio

Demo Code not reproducible ?

The code below, taken from the JDev 3.1 Help "Executing a View Object's Query", runs in an applet.
When the jButton is pressed, the following messages appear:
Unable to create application module.
Definition Package2.Package2Module of type ApplicationModule not found
What am I doing wrong?
void jButton1_actionPerformed(ActionEvent e) {
ApplicationModule appMod = getGenericAppMod(JboContext.PLATFORM_LOCAL);
public static ApplicationModule getGenericAppMod(String platform)
Hashtable env = new Hashtable(2);
env.put(Context.INITIAL_CONTEXT_FACTORY, JboContext.JBO_CONTEXT_FACTORY);
env.put(JboContext.DEPLOY_PLATFORM, platform);
try
Context ic = new InitialContext(env);
String theAMDefName = "Package2.Package2Module";
ApplicationModuleHome home = (ApplicationModuleHome)ic.lookup(theAMDefName);
ApplicationModule appMod = home.create();
appMod.getTransaction().connect("jdbc:oracle:thin:scott/[email protected]:1521:comp48");
return appMod;
catch(Exception e)
e.printStackTrace();
return null;
}

If your BC4J application is a separate project from the applet and the outpath for the BC4J application is not JDEV_HOME/myclasses then it would not be able find the appmodule classes.
In this case you would need to add the appmodule classes to the classpath of the applet project by creating a new library.
raghu

When I tried to log into my itunes account, I was asked to update my credit card information. When I confirmed my credit card info, I got a response about my security code not being accurate -which is not the case-it is 100% accurate. How do I fix?

I keep getting a message about my security code not being accurate. I tried 3 different cards & have the same issue. Is this a systems issue? I need to get my apps installed on my new iPhone 4. I am unable to download without confirming my credit card info- My security codes are 100% accurate.Anyone else having this issue? What is the fix for this?

Ohemod,
There are 120+ countries that have iTunes Stores, but that leaves many that do not. You can consult this document: iTunes Store: Which types of items can I buy in my country?
Opening in a new country requires a tremendous amount of legal, commercial and financial investment, but I am sure Apple would be interested in knowing where there is unmet demand. If you wish to make suggestions to Apple, you can use the iTunes Feedback page.

Zero values not taken into account during retraction

Hello,
we are having an issue with data retraction.
When we reset a value to zero, the change in the value is not taken into account and the corresponding value in R/3 remains unchanged.
There are some posts that say that the function modules UPR_COST_PLAN_EXEC and UPR_COST_PLAN_INIT should be modified in order to populate <xth_data> with zero values, but debug mode shows that the data are read before calling these functions, and the zero values are
already ignored at this stage.
Could anyone help me, please?
Thank you in advance!

Here is the second method -
Regarding your issue:
Retraction is based on the records of the SEM buffer. Zero records are
in general filtered in the buffer, so that they cannot be considered forplanning functions that execute the retraction. I regret but this is
the normal system behaviour in the standard. As workaround, please use adummy key figure that is set to a value <> 0.
The only way is a work around. If you fill a dummy key figure with an
arbitrary value, the frame work recognizes this as not 0, even if the
proper key figure is 0. In that case the 0 retraction would work. So if
not existing, create an additional dummy key figure to the cube and workon as described.
For all the of retractions (CO-OM, IM, PS) BPS planning functions are
used and they run in the general BPS framework. This framework is
designed to explicitly not process zero records because of performance
reasons.
If zero records would be processed, planning functions would run longer
but they can't deal with those records anyway. Therefore the developmentdecided on the current design, to delete all zero records first, before
processing them with a planning function. This decision has been
discussed several times before and it not likely to be changed.
Regarding SAP note you can check the work aroud I explained can be foundin the oss note 768822 SEM-BPS: Retraction of WBS element w/ Pushback.
I hope this explains the reason.
Please kindly confirm the message if your issue is answered.
Thanks for your support and cooperation.

Toggle checkbox by code not taken in consideration - cProjects

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for