Trunk between two SF220-48 switches

Hello!
I have two SF220-48 switches with default VLAN1 and additionally created VLAN2 & VLAN3.
Switches placed in two rooms and are connected to each other via one Ethernet cable which is connected in 48 port on every switch.
How must I configure 48 port to make it trunk for VLAN1 and VLAN2 & VLAN3?
Thank's!

I'm using web interface and make this setting:
When PСs connected to VLAN2 ports on same switch they can ping each other, but when PСs connected to VLAN2 ports on different switches, they can't ping or make any outer connections.

Similar Messages

Absolute time between two sets of switches

Hi!
I am trying to write a VI that will find the time difference between two sets of switches. I have attached what I currently have which only gets the time for one set of switches.
What I am trying to include in my VI includes inputing data from two different ports and finding the resulting time difference. The two sets of switches go into different ports on the usb. The starting switches are in port 2 whereas the stoping switches are in port 1. Switch one from the first set should start the timer and switch one from the second set should stop the timer. And this logic continues for the remaining sets. Switch 2 from the first set starts the time and switch 2 from the second set stops the timer...All six switches are completely independant so they can stop in any order.
I was also wondering how to just have the absolute time from start to stop in hrs/min/sec? And then how to I write the resulting 6 times in hrs/min/sec to a spreadsheet?
Thanks so much for your help! I apologize for my simple questions! I am new to labview and computer programming in general.
Attachments:
patch_six.vi ‏25 KB

Please don't start a new thread with the same question. I already gave you an answer in the original thread.

Trunk config between two 6500 cat switches

Hi All,
What is the recommended trunk configuration between 2 cisco 6500 switches including hsrp scenario.
Thanks

Hi Samir,
In almost all scenarios, its recommended to have 'dot1q' encapsulation and a static trunk config 'switchport mode trunk'. Matching the native VLAN on both sides is required and will be VLAN1 by default.
When configuring trunks, you should be mindful of VTP, trunk and STP states. Reviewing the following for mismatches between your Cat6K will help:
- show vtp status
- show interfaces trunk
- show spanning-tree
In terms of HSRP, it is also recommended to run HSRP active in the same location as STP Root to avoid any asynchronous routing problems.
/ijay

VLAN between two Cisco 300 switches

Is it possible to share a VLAN between two Cisco 300 series switches?

Make sure that your port 27 is NOT configured as an access port - it should be a trunk (that's the default). I believe the setting is under VLAN Management > Interface settings.
Also ensure you are setup to tag frames (under the "Port to VLAN" settings).

Newbie: trunk between 6500 and Blade Switch 3020

Hi,
Beeing newbie , I need advice to setup trunk between my 2 switches.
I would like to use 4 ports as TRUNK
On the 6500 , this is what I have done :
set port channel 5/37-40 61
set trunk 5/37 auto isl 1-1005,1025-4094
set trunk 5/38 auto isl 1-1005,1025-4094
set trunk 5/39 auto isl 1-1005,1025-4094
set trunk 5/40 auto isl 1-1005,1025-4094
On the Blade Switch 3020 I have done :
interface GigabitEthernet0/17
switchport trunk encapsulation isl
switchport mode trunk
shutdown
channel-group 1 mode on
interface GigabitEthernet0/18
switchport trunk encapsulation isl
switchport mode trunk
shutdown
channel-group 1 mode on
interface GigabitEthernet0/19
switchport trunk encapsulation isl
switchport mode trunk
shutdown
channel-group 1 mode on
interface GigabitEthernet0/20
switchport trunk encapsulation isl
switchport mode trunk
shutdown
channel-group 1 mode on
Will that work ?
Could you tell me if I have to put the trunk port on the same VLAN ?
Many thanks in advance for your help.
regards
David

version 12.2
no service pad
service timestamps debug uptime
service timestamps log uptime
no service password-encryption
hostname Lux-bl-sw1
enable secret xxx
no aaa new-model
ip subnet-zero
no file verify auto
spanning-tree mode pvst
spanning-tree extend system-id
vlan internal allocation policy ascending
interface Port-channel1
interface FastEthernet0
no ip address
no ip route-cache
interface GigabitEthernet0/1
switchport access vlan 181
speed 1000
spanning-tree portfast
interface GigabitEthernet0/2
switchport access vlan 181
speed 1000
spanning-tree portfast
interface GigabitEthernet0/3
switchport access vlan 181
speed 1000
spanning-tree portfast
interface GigabitEthernet0/4
switchport access vlan 181
speed 1000
spanning-tree portfast
interface GigabitEthernet0/5
switchport access vlan 181
speed 1000
spanning-tree portfast
interface GigabitEthernet0/6
switchport access vlan 181
speed 1000
spanning-tree portfast
interface GigabitEthernet0/7
switchport access vlan 181
speed 1000
spanning-tree portfast
interface GigabitEthernet0/8
switchport access vlan 181
speed 1000
spanning-tree portfast
interface GigabitEthernet0/9
switchport access vlan 181
speed 1000
spanning-tree portfast
interface GigabitEthernet0/10
switchport access vlan 181
speed 1000
spanning-tree portfast
interface GigabitEthernet0/11
switchport access vlan 181
speed 1000
spanning-tree portfast
interface GigabitEthernet0/12
switchport access vlan 181
speed 1000
spanning-tree portfast
interface GigabitEthernet0/13
switchport access vlan 181
speed 1000
spanning-tree portfast
interface GigabitEthernet0/14
switchport access vlan 181
speed 1000
spanning-tree portfast
interface GigabitEthernet0/15
switchport access vlan 181
speed 1000
spanning-tree portfast
interface GigabitEthernet0/16
switchport access vlan 181
speed 1000
spanning-tree portfast
interface GigabitEthernet0/17
interface GigabitEthernet0/18
interface GigabitEthernet0/19
interface GigabitEthernet0/20
interface GigabitEthernet0/21
interface GigabitEthernet0/22
interface GigabitEthernet0/23
interface GigabitEthernet0/24
interface Vlan1
no ip address
no ip route-cache
interface Vlan181
ip address xxx.xx.x.xxx 255.255.0.0
no ip route-cache
ip default-gateway xxx.xx.x.xx
ip http server
control-plane
line con 0
line vty 0 4
password fsv14m
login
line vty 5 15
password fsv14m
login
end
Port Name Status Vlan Duplex Speed Type
Gi0/1 connected 181 full 1000 1000BaseX
Gi0/2 connected 181 full 1000 1000BaseX
Gi0/17 connected trunk a-full a-1000 10/100/1000BaseTX
Gi0/18 connected trunk a-full a-1000 10/100/1000BaseTX
Gi0/19 notconnect 1 auto auto Not Present
Gi0/20 notconnect 1 auto auto Not Present
Gi0/21 connected trunk a-full a-1000 10/100/1000BaseTX
Gi0/22 notconnect 1 auto auto 10/100/1000BaseTX
Gi0/23 connected trunk a-full a-1000 10/100/1000BaseTX
Gi0/24 notconnect 1 auto auto 10/100/1000BaseTX
Po1 notconnect 1 auto auto
Fa0 connected routed full a-100 10/100BaseTX
We saw that all the ports on the gig switch are set to be trunk by default.
trunk works
I need to investigate how to setup a ether channel trunk ( to have a 4 gig trunk instead of 4*1 gig )

SIP Trunking between 2 different networks

Hi,
Can anyone confirms me that in order to establish SIP trunk between two IP PBX resided in different networks, what is the requirement?
providing that IP PBX doesn't have WAN port.

Hello omerpal1190,
You might want to look at Cisco Unified Border Element solution that will help you do SIP trunking easier. Kindly refer to the link attached for more information about the additional requirements that you might still need.http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/unified-communications/unified-border-element/data-sheet-c78-729692.html
Hope this helps! If you need additional assistance regarding this, please feel free to send me an email at [email protected]
Regards,
Alyza Reyes

Etherchannel between two 2950 switches

I have a etherchannel defined between 2 L2 switches using LACP as shown below. The etherchannel works fine, however when I hard code speed/duplex on both ends the etherchannel fails. What is causing this behaviour?
SW02:
interface Port-channel5
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/1
switchport mode trunk
channel-group 5 mode active
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/2
switchport mode trunk
channel-group 5 mode active
SW02:
interface Port-channel5
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/1
switchport mode trunk
channel-group 5 mode active
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/2
switchport mode trunk
channel-group 5 mode active

Thank you for the rating.
Regarding your replacement scenario, I'll give the standard engineering answer ("it depends"), but actually follow up with something I hope is more helpful. I'm sincerely interested to see other's viewpoint on this as well, as it has changed over the years.
Many years ago (let's say a decade) I ran into problems with some devices not being able to auto-negotiate properly. There was a tendancy for devices to fail or negotiate to half-duplex mode when a full-duplex connection was warranted. At the time, the problems we experienced were mainly with traffic shaping devices and some other gear. There were others using fixed settings as a standard practice, and we did the same since we had verifiable issues.
Fast forward to now. I personally have not experienced auto-negotiation problems in a long time and am reading more from others in the field that auto-negotiation is the way to go (such as from the link provided). Indeed, I've now run into the opposite scenario: I had a particular situation where a link between two devices defaulted to half-duplex EVEN THOUGH they were both set to 100/Full. It turned out to be a race condition between a device and a Cisco router...the other device booted faster, didn't see anything on the link, and "helpfully" dropped down to half-duplex. I confirmed the issue with the device vendor, who recommended setting ports to auto-negotiate as the fix (their software would not be updated for a bit of time).
I would recommend auto-negotiate as a standard practice, with the exception of areas where you have encountered specific problems. Those latter cases should be caught through your pre-deployment testing, and discussed with the respective vendors so that you fully understand why the devices are behaving the way they are so that the proper mitigation measures can be put in place (i.e. - It is going to act the same way every time, and you can work with that).
Good luck! -Ed

Cross switch etherchannel config between two 6500 and 3750

Dear All,
I would like to design the network and got some problem, my network have one 3750 and two 6500, I would like to setup the etherchannel from 3750 (total two uplink port together), one link to the first 6500 and the other link to second 6500, one trunk between 6500 for redundance.
I tried to use PAgP (auto/desirable, on/on), but the channel misconfig error occurred, the etherchannel keep in suspected or standalone state.
Anybody can suggest/recommend some method for this case.
Thanks

Unfortunately, you cannot create an etherchannel from one device to two different devices. for example, from 3750 you have gig 1/0/1 and gig 1/0/2. gig 1/0/1 of 3750 connects to port 1/1 of switch A and gig 1/0/2 of that same 3750 connects to port 1/2 of switch B. You can NOT create an etherchannel on 3750 to combine gig 1/0/1 and gig 1/0/2 to create a bigger pipe. That is not how etherchannel is designed to do.
However, if you have gig 1/0/1 and gig 1/0/2 on 3750 connecting to port 1/1 and 1/2 of switch A, you can create a channel on bith devices to create a bigger pipe (4 GBPS @ full duplex) and let's say that on that same 3750, you have an additional gig 1/0/3 and gig 1/0/4 that connects to ports 1/1 and 1/2 of switch B, you can create another separate channel that combines gig 1/0/3 and gig 1/0/4 and switch B's port 1/1 and 1/2, this scenarion is totally acceptable.
I hope that helps clear up channeling.
In your described scenario, channeling is not what you are asking, it's STP and you really do not need to do anything as STP is enabled by default, maybe you just need to make sure that the root is where you wnat it to be and that is configureable. With your looped physical topology, STP will prevent loop from forming and will give you the redundancy you seek as when one link fails, the ones blocked by STP would go forwarding once STP detects that it should forward that port.
Please rate helpful posts.

How do I quickly* switch between two Skype account...

I have a need to be able to quickly* switch between two Skype accounts on my Windows 7 desktop computer.
Both accounts have high-security difficult-to-remember and hard-to-type passwords.
Many products have a facility for doing this, remembering recent account/password combinations, or having linked accounts.
Does Skype have a way of doing this?
And if it doesn't, how do I request it get one be developed?
I use a password manager, LastPass, but of course Skype isn't a browser so it doesn't work with Lastpass.
* "Quickly switch" means without switching computer sign-on accounts and without re-typing the high-security difficult-to-remember and hard-to-type passwords many times per day.
I understand you're all volunteers. Thank you very much for your efforts on this.
- Keith
Solved!
Go to Solution.

This can be done by setting up an another Skype client in a separate directory and with a shortcut containing the extra /datapath, /removable and /secondary switches.
http://community.skype.com/t5/Windows-desktop-client/Why-did-Microsoft-have-to-go-and-ruin-Skype-lik...
For your purpose you can make use of a copy of Skype.exe of the already installed Skype application.

Using Trunking 1.3 to create a trunk accross two switches

Hi:
I have installed Solaris Trunking 1.3 on my SF 880 which is running Solaris 10. It has two CE interfaces which i have configured in one trunk. Failover works fine when I connect them to a single Nortel 8000 switch. The problem is that I can't get failover working properly when I connect one CE interface to a Nortel 8000 switch and the other CE interface to another Nortel 8000 switch. Should this work? I have seen many references, eg in the Solaris Trunking 1.3 documentation, that actually says you can't create a trunk accross switches but i also found BUG ID 5079123 which says you can.
By the way I can't use the version of trunking software that is bundled with Solaris 10 because it doesn't support the CE interfaces.
Cheers
Steve

Thanks for your reply. I should have mentioned that i don't need load balencing over the trunk to work. I just need failover to work. In fact that is just what the bug id says i should be able to do across two switches. Here's a copy of the bug id:
Bug ID: 5079123
Synopsis: Trunking 1.3 to support L2 failover across switches
Category: enet_trunking
Subcategory: softwareState: 10-Fix Delivered
Description: Due to overwhelming requests to support L2 failover solution for Sun NIC across two switches. This is not trunking or Link aggregation feature as it breaks the standard of all trunk members connect to one switch.
Requirements are :
1. provide Layer 2 failover similar to IPMP(layer 3) and yet be simple enough to configure.
2. No loadbalancing.
3. Connect across two switches. and when one switch/nic fails, the traffic moves seemlessly and instantly.
4. Failback: When the failed link is back online, traffic moves back to original link. Date Modified: 2004-09-08 06:13:32 GMT+00:00
Cheers
Steve

How to switch between two query in Web templete.

Hi all,
Here i am facing problem to switch between two query in web template by using one 'table' web item. is there any way to use hyperlink 'SAP_BW_URL' and we can switch to query. here i am using these HTML code..
<table><tr><td class="SAPBEXBtnStdBorder" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" border="0"><tr><td>
<table><tr><td class="sapbexbtnstd" ><A href="<SAP_BW_URL cmd='reset_item' item='table_data' query_ID='ZSD_ZSD_M01_Q20' apply_cmd_on_target= "X">" >Switch to other query</A></td></tr></table>
but i am not getting correct functionality.
please help me to solve this problem.
I know the best way to say thanks in SDN.
thanks
Kiran Patel

Kiran,
Use the web api reset_data_provider as links or in select option in HTML.
   Onchange event of this select option should call JAVASCRIPT method and
   this in turn resets the current dataprovider to your concerned one.
   How to change graphs:
   The graph item has the default data provider:
   <object>
         <param name="OWNER" value="SAP_BW"/>
         <param name="CMD" value="GET_ITEM"/>
         <param name="NAME" value="CHART_1"/>
         <param name="ITEM_CLASS" value="CL_RSR_WWW_ITEM_CHART"/>
         <param name="DATA_PROVIDER" value="DATAPROVIDER_1"/>
         <param name="TMP_CHART_DATA_HANDLE" value="IIP_49MOXB0UVNOMM6JOZMZU7QO21"/>
         ITEM:            CHART_1
   </object>
So if you change the DATAPROVIDER_1 using RESET_DATA_PROVIDER to your concerned DP, this changes chart as well !!
   Please use this method and refer to sample code for Onchange Event on SELECT OPTION:
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<script>
function callDP() {
     if(document.forms[0].dp.value == "1") {
        //form your URL here..
       url = SAP_BW_URL_Get() + "&CMD=RESET_DATA_PROVIDER&DATA_PROVIDER_1=..&...";
        SAPBWOpenURL(url);
        //or docuemtn.location.href = url..
        //etc..
</script>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<form>
<select name="dp" onChange="javascript:callDP();">
<option value="1">1</option>
<option value="2">2</option>
</select>
</form>
</BODY>
</HTML>
HOPE THIS HELPS !!!

White box appears while switching between two desktops

Hello all,
Since few weeks I have a problem when I switch between two Desktops. Everytime I switch between them a white box appears in the left corner of my screen (see screenshot).

Please read this whole message before doing anything.
This procedure is a diagnostic test. It’s unlikely to solve your problem. Don’t be disappointed when you find that nothing has changed after you complete it.
The purpose of the test is to determine whether the problem is caused by third-party software that loads automatically at startup or login, by a peripheral device, or by corruption of certain system caches.
Disconnect all wired peripherals except those needed for the test, and remove all aftermarket expansion cards. Boot in safe mode and log in to the account with the problem. Note: If FileVault is enabled on some models, or if a firmware password is set, or if the boot volume is a software RAID, you can’t do this. Ask for further instructions.
Safe mode is much slower to boot and run than normal, and some things won’t work at all, including sound output and Wi-Fi on certain iMacs. The next normal boot may also be somewhat slow.
The login screen appears even if you usually log in automatically. You must know your login password in order to log in. If you’ve forgotten the password, you will need to reset it before you begin. Test while in safe mode. Same problem? After testing, reboot as usual (i.e., not in safe mode) and verify that you still have the problem. Post the results of the test.

HT1918 hi I'm travelling between two countries and i have a credit card and address in both, can i set up my itunes account to switch between the respectice i tunes stores

hi I'm travelling between two countries and i have a credit card and address in both, can i set up my itunes account to switch between the respectice i tunes stores

Not a single account, no, at least not easily. It would be better to set up individual iTunes Store accounts, one in each country. Your computer and devices can quite happily deal with two accounts, and then you can just log into the appropriate account when you're in the applicable country. You'll need a second email address to able to create a new Apple ID.
Regards.

Switching between two Apple IDs - 90 day wait?

I have been smoothly transitioning between two apple IDs on iTunes for the last year. I have just switched from PC to Mac and suddenly there's a message that states I have to wait 90 days before I can associate another Apple ID with this device. I don't really understand what this means, especially since I've already successfully logged in to both Apple ID accounts in iTunes on my new Mac. I don't want to wait 90 days every time I buy something from one account before it will let me buy something from the other (is this what this means?) I'd really appreciate an explanation from the learned Mac-user community. Thanks so much for your help!

annikaaus wrote:
Thank you, I did find that information myself, but it didn't really make things clearer to me. Once the 90 days is up will I be able to switch back and forth as I please? Or do I have to wait 90 days every time I want to switch IDs?
You can switch back & forth now as you please for new purchases (not for redownloading). 90 days is for redownloading.
iTunes prefs > Store.
Uncheck Automatic Downloads.
And why wasn't I aware of this wait time on my old PC device?
You never saw this because Automatic Downloads was not ticked.

Etherchannel trunk with two cisco switch

Hi, my company using only one Cisco 3750 switch with VLAN1,2,3,4,5.
Now my company bought another cisco switch and we would like to etherchannel trunk between both and create new VLAN in new switch. We look over from partner, some of them suggested we use LACP, and some of them suggest we use PAgP. We are so confuse which will be better in our environment.
Previous: Router <> 3750 switch A (VLAN 1,2,3,4,5)
Now we bought another Cisco Switch B: Router <>3750 switch A <> switch B (add more VLAN 6,7,8,9,10)
Which of below command is the best choice to suit our company ? suppose we use 2 port of gigabitethernet 1/0/1 and 1/0/2 trunk? All VLAN 1-10 need to communicate with each other.
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/1
channel-group 1 mode active <<< (use "active" or "desirable" is the best choice)
switchport mode trunk
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/2
channel-group 1 mode active
switchport mode trunk
interface Port-channel 1
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q << (do we need put this? as we think this is by default after trunk?)
switchport mode trunk
switchport nonegotiate <<< (do we need "nonegotiate" if both switch setup same configure?)

Hello
My understanding is pagp and lacp basically perform the same features - however as PAGP is cisco propriety LACP is IEEE standard which can be used between different route/switch vendor platforms.
As for disabling DTP ( switchport nonegotiate) - i would agree to do this suggestion, As so not to have trunks being dynamically created.
Lastly i would manually prune unused vlans across trunk interfaces, to save on cpu and memory usage because of the stp instances that coild be used ( however such a small vlan database like yours would not be an issue)
So to summarise:
Cisco to Cisco ehterchannels =PAGP
Cisco to other vendors = LACP
L2 etherchannel
================
1) default physical interfaces (if possible)
2) configure port-channel in physical interfaces
-- port-channel will be created automatically
3)create trunking encapsulation or access port mode directly in port-channel interface
4)enable physical interfaces "no shut"
conf t
default int ran fa0/1 -3 ( if applicable)
int ran fa0/1 -3
shut ( if applicable)
channel-group 1 mode xxx
int port-channel 1
switchport trunk encap dot1q
switchport- mode trunk
switchport nonegotiate
switchport trunk allowed vlan 1-10
res
Paul

Trunk between two SF220-48 switches

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for