Unable to clear flags in Mail using Exchange 2010

I am able to flag messages without a problem, but when I try to turn those flags off within a few moments it will sync them back to "flagged."  I basically cannot unflag a flagged message.  Connected to an Exchange 2010 server.  Not having any problems getting or syncing mail.  Activity window is clear and nothing is queued up.
I see "changing flags" pop up really quick in the Activity window but as soon as it sync's back up with Exchange those flags come right back.
Help!

I've found a solution that works for me, although it's a little technical.
I found that the Envelope Index file in Home/Library/Mail/V2/MailData/ is actually a sqlite3 database.
the steps I followed were:
Quit Mail (don't know if this is necessary)
Open Terminal, and cd to ~/Library/Mail/V2/MailData/
open the sqlite db using the sqlite3 command line client:
$> sqlite3 Envelope\ Index
Now, in the sqlite3 command shell I queried the messages table to see which messages were flagged:
sqlite> select * from messages where flagged = '1';
I verified that the one message I couldn't clear was in the result set and then I updated the database and cleared the flag:
sqlite> update messages set flagged = '0' where flagged = '1';
Re-start Mail, and voila - flagged messages gone.
Note: to selectively clear the flags from only certain messages would probably require a more advanced update statement that included some join in the where clause.

Similar Messages

  • Problem syncing old emails from Outlook to Mail using Exchange 2010

    HI,
    I recently switched from Outlook 2011 to Lion Apple Mail.  I am set up for email through my comany's exchange server.  When I set up Mail, all of my folders showed up on my Mail account successfully but it will only sync back the last 60 days of emails.  I know these old emails do reside on the server.  Is there potentially a setting on mail to adjust how back it syncs?  If not, can someone suggest a work-around.  I would only have to do this once.
    Thanks

    When transferring a locally stored message that was recieved a year ago to a server stored mailbox with an IMAP account - doing this today for example, the recieved date for the message is changed to today's date - at least with an email client used to access the account.

  • Can i use exchange 2010 in the mail(4.5)?

    Can i use exchange 2010 in the mail(4.5)?
    i can't use exchange 2010 in the mail (4.5),but i can use normally in the mail (3.6)。why?

    Of course you can use your iPhone in the rain but since devices are not waterproof, nobody in their right mind would recommend it. The risk is yours and an out-of-warranty repair might cost more than a few bucks.
    I highly recommend you read this article: http://support.apple.com/kb/ht3302
    And some kind of a protective casing if you insist on using the device in the rain.
    Live long and prosper!

  • When I send e-mail messages with file by using a POP3 in Exchange 2010 I received delivered message with file. How I can disable this functions that file do not include to delivery message. I use Exchange 2010 only local users.

    When I send e-mail messages with file by using a POP3 in Exchange 2010 I received delivered message with file. How I can disable this functions that file do not include to delivery message.  I use Exchange 2010 only local users.

    I think there is not native rule for this, but you could try a transport rule which removes all attachments over a very small file size like 1KB.
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2009/05/11/3407435.aspx
    CRM Advisor

  • Has anybody experienced missing sent emails after updating their iPhone to IOS 5.0?  Mail composed on phone appears to send but is never delivered nor does it show in sent items. Using Exchange 2010. Any thoughts??

    Has anybody experienced missing sent emails after updating their iPhone to IOS 5.0?  Mail composed on phone appears to send but is never delivered nor does it show in sent items. Using Exchange 2010. Any thoughts??

    @Satterp
    Not sure if you were responding to me or OP - my iPhone is on 5.1.  The OP at the time of writing was on 5.0.1.
    Also, the OP and I had setup our Hotmail as an Exchange server (similar to IMAP), not POP3.

  • Is it supported to connect Exchange 2013 Mailbox using Exchange 2010 CAS in Co-existence?

    Hi Team,
    I am in the phase of upgrading Exchange 2010 to 2013, and introduced 4 MBX and 2 CAS of 2013 servers in co-existence.
    Only one production mailbox of 2010 moved to 2013. The owa of the mailbox moved to 2013, is working OK internally coz only internally configured, but when I configure outlook using 2010 settings, it got configured but when I open outlook it doesn't
    open and throws an error of some "cannot open set of folders".
    Is it supported to connect Exchange 2013 Mailbox using Exchange 2010 CAS in Co-existence? because I havnt configured 2013 CAS servers yet.
    Kindly share some KB or tip. Any help is appreciated. Thank You.
    Muhammad Nadeem Ahmed Sr System Support Engineer Premier Systems (Pvt) Ltd T. +9221-2429051 Ext-226 F. +9221-2428777 M. +92300-8262627 Web. www.premier.com.pk

    I'll change Adam's wording slightly - you *MUST* install a CAS 13 server into every site where there is a MBX 13 server.
    Cheers,
    Rhoderick
    Microsoft Senior Exchange PFE
    Blog:
    http://blogs.technet.com/rmilne 
    Twitter:   LinkedIn:
      Facebook:
      XING:
    Note: Posts are provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, including but not limited to the implied warranties of merchantability and/or fitness for a particular purpose.

  • Core roles installed on one virtual server for roughly 200-300 mailboxes using Exchange 2010?

    For a customer who is looking at keeping costs down, they are wondering whether setting up a virtualized Exchange 2010 server with all the core roles installed would be possible.  So the mailbox, CAS and hub all on one virtual slice. 
    The customer has around 200-300 mailboxes. 
    I know that its hard to give a guess for sizing, but I was wondering if a 4 core, 16 GB RAM build on Server 2012 would be sufficient, with the storage obvioulsy being SAN.  I know this is dependant upon mailbox size and usage, but I don't have those
    numbers unfortunately.  Would the 4/16 build be sufficient?  Too much?
    Any further information around this would be great.  Thanks.

    Hello,
    I recommend you use Exchange 2010 Server Role Requirements Calculator to design your environment.
    A blog for your reference.
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2009/11/09/3408737.aspx
    If you have any feedback on our support, please click
    here
    Cara Chen
    TechNet Community Support

  • How to Block send e-mail by telnet using Exchange 2010

    Hi
    I have Exchange 2010 SP3 server (Edge and Database servers).
    When i logon to exchange server: telnet mail.domain.com 25using commands:
    mail from:[email protected]
    rcpt to:[email protected]
    I can send e-mails without password.
    How to block it? What is wrong with this server settings?
    Kind Regards Tomasz

    you can change the receive connector that is listening on port 25 to require authentication removing the anonymous the problem will be every server that sends you email will need to have a password on your server so  you will not receive email
    form anyone unless they have the password configured if you only want to receive email on this server from another trusted server than this is how you do it, otherwise you need to leave anonymous access enabled. Spam appliances sometimes will be the only server
    allowed to send to your exchange server, but the spam appliance will have anonymous access allowed on port 25 so it can get the email. Typically the distribution of port 25 traffic is handled at the firewall and it's either sending port 25 traffic to
    your email server or a spam appliance.

  • Exchange 2013 not delivering mails to Exchange 2010

    I am upgrading exchange 2010 to exchange 2013 and currently in coexistence.  I cutover the mx to deliver mail to 2013 cas VIP last night and no mail was being received by the 2010 mailboxes, it was all being queued on the 2013 mailbox servers (mailbox
    and cas servers are separate in this deployment.) There are only a few 2013 mailboxes as I have not yet started migrating them.  These 2013 internal mailboxes can not send to exchange 2010 either, but 2010 can send to 2013. 2013 to 2013 mail works
    fine. I have read somewhere about an issue with a receive connector having the same ip range that includes the mailbox servers, but I'm not clear on really which mailbox servers it is alluding to.
    All the exchange 2010 servers are all on the 10.1.1.* network.  Exchange 2013 CAS servers are all on the 10.1.1.* network and the 3 exchange mailbox servers are on 10.1.1.*, 10.1.2.* and 10.30.5.*.  Only 1 AD site.  On one of the 2010 receive
    connectors there is a scope of 10.1.1.0/24  I'm wondering if this is the culprit and by removing it should fix the problem.  Any other ideas would be appreciated.

    Exchange 2013 users are unable to send emails to exchange 2010 users then check your connectors on Exchange 2013 Mailbox server. and yes if you have overlapping of scopes in different connectors then this can happen.
    Kindly mark this as answer if found helpful. Thanks.
    Regards, Riaz Javed Butt Consultant Microsoft Professional Services MCITP, MCITP (Exchange), MCSE: Messaging, MCITP Office 365

  • Mail users have spam sent to their secondary SMTP addresses forwarded to their personal e-mail addresses- Exchange 2010

    We currently have a spam issue relating to the secondary SMTP e-mail addresses of all our Mail Users.
    Example: Peter Smith has an AD account on our company.com domain and an associated external e-mail address ([email protected]) i.e. he has an AD account ([email protected]) with Mail User Exchange attributes so that he can logon
    to our SharePoint server. However, this AD account also becomes a fully functional secondary SMTP address and all spam sent to [email protected] also gets forwarded to [email protected]
    To mitigate this issue, I have added this secondary e-mail address to the "Recipient filtering properties > Block messages sent to the following recipients" in Hub Transport/Anti Spam.
    Two questions:
    1. Is there an easy way to delete the secondary SMTP addresses of mail users? I was unable to (it just reappeared shortly after deletion)
    2. What is the PS command to export a list of all secondary SMTP e-mail addresses OF MAIL USERS and then adding this list to "Recipient filtering properties > Block messages sent to the following recipients". I could manually add them
    in EMC but there are quite a few of them...
    Many thanks for your help!

    Now that I understand what's happening, let me see if we can get a more accurate solution for you.  So your mail users (Exchange calls them mail-enabled users, as opposed to mailbox enabled users, who have mailboxes) have SharePoint access (with the
    @company.com address), but have actual mailboxes externally (the actual end-domain is inconsequential).  You want users of these systems to stop receiving emails on the company.com namespace, but to receive them from only your SharePoint system. 
    A "textual diagram" is below:
    SharePoint (to Exchange mailbox owner) ==> Exchange hub (using company.com) ==> Exchange mailbox
    SharePoint (to External mail user) ==> Exchange hub (using company.com) ==> Exchange mail contact ==> External system (using external SMTP address
    External Messaging system (to External mail user, using company.com address used by SharePoint) ==> Exchange hub =XX=> Block delivery
    You wish to stop the third of these from happening.  If your SharePoint system used non-routable addresses (such as company.local) and all of your mail users had only these addresses added to their accounts for internal mail precossing (as the
    internal name used by Exchange), this would solve your issue.  The question becomes how to deploy this sort of address. 
    If these are the ONLY mail contacts in your organization, the solution is simple - you almost had it above, but may have missed seeing it.  Policies are applied on a priority basis, with the default policy applying only if no others apply.  Since
    these accounts are considered "Contacts with external e-mail addresses", you can create a policy for your entire organization that handles only these accounts.  You don't need to apply it to a single OU, if your mail enabled accounts aren't
    in a single OU.  (If they are, of course, feel free to apply it only there.)  You can create the policy and apply it to the organization, but only to those objects that are "Contacts with external e-mail addresses".  That way, it won't
    affect any of your Exchange mailboxes (current or future).
    Does this help?
    (BTW, one minor correction - your third statement about mail contacts is incorrect - Exchange sees no major difference between mail contacts and mail enabled accounts - and in my experience they are both addressable by the internal address.)

  • Mail and Exchange 2010

    Hi, I am a new Mac convert and would really like to use Mac mail for my work email account and ditch outlook. The company just recently upgraded to Exchange 2010. I was able to configure the email account for my work address to use Mail but I have been having a few issues:
    1. Cid posted on bottom of outgoing emails when received by others example: cid:D28BC3A7-3826-43CA-96B5-8C29EBE3CE4D@XXXX]
    2. Inserted a png in the signature but I have been told the image is not there when others are using Outlook.
    3. I tried to remove my ichat image from my vcard but the clear custom image is dithered.
    I did search the forums before posting and could not find exactly what I needed. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
    Thank you

    The first update for 10.8 has solved Exchange problems in 10.8. Read > https://discussions.apple.com/thread/4136482

  • Mail from Exchange 2010 mailbox - BCC to Hotmail addresses with blank To: field not hounoured

    Hi
    This feels related to a previous question
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/exchange/en-US/bec88844-79c1-4d17-bf73-9425842b22de/problem-sending-mail-with-bcc-and-without-to?forum=exchangesvrgenerallegacy but is slightly different - it just applies to Hotmail and related addresses (e.g.
    hotmail.com, hotmail.co.uk, outlook.com, live.co.uk).
    Sending from our Exchange 2010 to BCC addresses with blank To: field, the BCC is not being honoured, but just by Hotmail-related addresses. Any Hotmail-related recipient sent to in this fashion sees all their and other Hotmail-related addresses in the To:
    field. But any other addresses to other mail hosts (gmail, yahoo etc) in the same BCC list aren't shown, and recipients at the other mail hosts have a fully hidden BCC list (i.e. see no To addresses at all).
    If the To: field has an address then there is no problem - all BCC addresses are hidden for all recipients as expected.
    It feels like it is the way the header is being handled by the Hotmail MTAs. But I only see this behaviour from our Exchange 2010 servers (including test servers).
    Below are message headers from examples - anyone any ideas on this?
    Thanks,
    Gordon
    Headers from the same message sent as a BCC to a "@live.co.uk" address and "@gmail.com" address with no To: field, and below that a header of similar with a To: field.
    First message, sent from [email protected] (gets translated to
    [email protected]) BCCd to
    [email protected] and [email protected] with no To: address.
    Seen in mailbox of [email protected] (note the "to:" field at the bottom - this is what is being shown in the UI):
    x-store-info:J++/JTCzmObr++wNraA4Pa4f5Xd6uensaUSop/gUCq9urBwwSF/6FOwwl1Py7H+wW1z5lc55JnUJDXNvxmGUxkw/bnnWJePWYXWzuS5Ywv2HQzl2GD+3A6SoaKpjD5JlShFHg3JE6so=
    Authentication-Results: hotmail.com; spf=pass (sender IP is 143.52.X.XX)
    [email protected]; dkim=none header.d=shu.ac.uk; x-hmca=pass
    [email protected]
    X-SID-PRA: [email protected]
    X-AUTH-Result: PASS
    X-SID-Result: PASS
    X-Message-Status: n:n
    X-Message-Delivery: Vj0xLjE7dXM9MDtsPTE7YT0xO0Q9MTtHRD0xO1NDTD0w
    X-Message-Info: NhFq/7gR1vQRHV6jbdvQfibhgw1iwvrSqdhXuaSscqGalY1BHnH2KCdI+PRBKCQiYnAlF/zI6HIxnd9XTtPz9XHPDwg5mATFcpFtv9WV5ImszG0/OtQaSIg5iX4MbuVLCVo+t2VN/SyhCbwRod9LNPet1UXZtp+Oho5aLYTKlYQVRQ8OWRHqxMCUhgER4oHof+Be4v85/e3u59xr9Q2GEVPOpY/FDKse
    Received: from MTA2.shu.ac.uk ([143.52.X.XX]) by SNT004-MC4F19.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.22712);
    Wed, 10 Sep 2014 03:56:32 -0700
    Received: from MTA1 ([10.14.XXX.XXX])
    by MTA2.shu.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
    (envelope-from <[email protected]>)
    id 1XRfZg-0004Kn-9C
    for [email protected]; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 11:56:32 +0100
    Received: from CAS1.shu.ac.uk ([10.14.XX.XX])
    by MTA1 with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1)
    (envelope-from <[email protected]>)
    id 1XRfZg-0002cz-2q; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 11:56:32 +0100
    Received: from MBX1.shu.ac.uk ([xxxx::xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx]) by
    CAS1.shu.ac.uk ([xxxx::xxxx:10.14.XX.XX%12]) with mapi id
    14.03.0174.001; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 11:56:29 +0100
    From: "user1" <[email protected]>
    Subject: RE: PLease ignore yet again! testing Bcc again - no "to" field
    Thread-Topic: PLease ignore yet again! testing Bcc again - no "to" field
    Thread-Index: Ac/M5d+WfHZZ5GLGRsCfXxvcxsjnbw==
    Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 10:56:28 +0000
    Message-ID: <[email protected]>
    Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
    Content-Language: en-US
    X-MS-Has-Attach:
    X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
    x-originating-ip: [10.14.XXX.XXX]
    Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
    boundary="_000_24BACA8040C3054487601DFC4087062C8C013974mbx1sh_"
    MIME-Version: 1.0
    to: [email protected]
    Return-Path: [email protected]
    X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Sep 2014 10:56:33.0151 (UTC) FILETIME=[E23190F0:01CFCCE5]
    Seen in mailbox of [email protected]:
    Delivered-To: [email protected]
    Received: by 10.25.156.200 with SMTP id f191csp386624lfe;
            Wed, 10 Sep 2014 03:56:32 -0700 (PDT)
    X-Received: by 10.194.200.137 with SMTP id js9mr48633666wjc.90.1410346592418;
            Wed, 10 Sep 2014 03:56:32 -0700 (PDT)
    Return-Path: <[email protected]>
    Received: from MTA1 (MTA1. [143.52.X.XXX])
            by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id cg3si20369633wjc.56.2014.09.10.03.56.32
            for <[email protected]>
            (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
            Wed, 10 Sep 2014 03:56:32 -0700 (PDT)
    Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of [email protected] designates 143.52.X.XXX as permitted sender) client-ip=143.52.X.XXX;
    Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
           spf=pass (google.com: domain of
    [email protected] designates 143.52.X.XXX as permitted sender)
    [email protected]
    Received: from CAS1.shu.ac.uk ([10.14.XX.XX])
    by MTA1 with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1)
    (envelope-from <[email protected]>)
    id 1XRfZg-0002cz-2q; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 11:56:32 +0100
    Received: from MBX1.shu.ac.uk ([xxxx::xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx]) by
    CAS1.shu.ac.uk ([xxxx::xxxx:10.14.XX.XX%12]) with mapi id
    14.03.0174.001; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 11:56:29 +0100
    From: "user1" <[email protected]>
    Subject: RE: PLease ignore yet again! testing Bcc again - no "to" field
    Thread-Topic: PLease ignore yet again! testing Bcc again - no "to" field
    Thread-Index: Ac/M5d+WfHZZ5GLGRsCfXxvcxsjnbw==
    Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 10:56:28 +0000
    Message-ID: <[email protected]>
    Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
    Content-Language: en-US
    X-MS-Has-Attach:
    X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
    x-originating-ip: [10.14.XXX.XXX]
    Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
    boundary="_000_24BACA8040C3054487601DFC4087062C8C013974mbx1sh_"
    MIME-Version: 1.0
    Similar message sent with [email protected] in To: field:  from
    [email protected]/[email protected] BCCd to
    [email protected] and
    [email protected] as seen in mailbox of [email protected]
    x-store-info:J++/JTCzmObr++wNraA4Pa4f5Xd6uensaUSop/gUCq9v81cBAiz99O+8SxkfBVJ9NjbAXH8xe1rjvemR/ciBJT5MdkHvi8JYPj0vgDySrSfVnSG2OjgyyKNgjV2QF5PyGqXgRRVkQVM=
    Authentication-Results: hotmail.com; spf=pass (sender IP is 143.52.X.XX)
    [email protected]; dkim=none header.d=shu.ac.uk; x-hmca=pass
    [email protected]
    X-SID-PRA: [email protected]
    X-AUTH-Result: PASS
    X-SID-Result: PASS
    X-Message-Status: n:n
    X-Message-Delivery: Vj0xLjE7dXM9MDtsPTE7YT0xO0Q9MTtHRD0xO1NDTD0w
    X-Message-Info: NhFq/7gR1vTvTqmPqDcS3ZKVZ4zJXdbe/WQhPCDn6U7TYJxfLAm+gALYf9z8EvjEIPauVTBwIF/uNFwreEfp3wgBZYYA8nUP8PFhNAMvRkDwCAnqdyWkFMZlNIQlCYkX84PJFTI7+qoRwxyIjAr2dfuXuj/qYYgN8IbRFD0FftK7d85hSKx/muFfL/1x713Efp1R2ztH/sUzvcxbXl+i8zHWvMqqF945
    Received: from MTA2.shu.ac.uk ([143.52.X.XX]) by BAY004-MC6F14.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.22712);
    Wed, 10 Sep 2014 05:22:06 -0700
    Received: from MTA1 ([10.14.XXX.XXX])
    by MTA2.shu.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
    (envelope-from <[email protected]>)
    id 1XRguU-0006jA-4s
    for [email protected]; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 13:22:06 +0100
    Received: from CAS2.shu.ac.uk ([10.14.XX.XX])
    by MTA1.shu.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1)
    (envelope-from <[email protected]>)
    id 1XRguU-0001YY-0a; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 13:22:06 +0100
    Received: from MBX1.shu.ac.uk ([xxxx::xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx]) by
    CAS2.shu.ac.uk ([xxxx::xxxx:10.14.XX.XX%15]) with mapi id
    14.03.0174.001; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 13:22:00 +0100
    From: "user1" <[email protected]>
    Subject: test BCC - using own name in To
    Thread-Topic: test BCC - using own name in To
    Thread-Index: Ac/M8dJDWdvoIxoORH2RMAqNKM2m1w==
    Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 12:22:00 +0000
    Message-ID: <[email protected]>
    Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
    Content-Language: en-US
    X-MS-Has-Attach:
    X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
    x-originating-ip: [10.14.XXX.XXX]
    Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
    boundary="_000_24BACA8040C3054487601DFC4087062C8C013A65mbx1sh_"
    MIME-Version: 1.0
    To: [email protected]
    Return-Path: [email protected]
    X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Sep 2014 12:22:07.0005 (UTC) FILETIME=[D63584D0:01CFCCF1]

    I'm guessing that they're using something other than Exchange for the MTA's. I don't recall seeing this in the "Received:" headers ever since Exchange stopped using the MS Windows SMTP service:
    Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.22712)
    --- Rich Matheisen MCSE&I, Exchange MVP

  • Use Exchange 2010 Hybrid Edition for SMTP relay

    Thanks guys.
    hmmm.
    I did try and telnet on port 25 to the hybrid and get the welcome, when i enter the mail from command and enter a valid email address, i get "530 5.7.1 Client was not authenticated"
    I have exchange 2003 admin experiance and and learning my way around the 365 environment still
    

    Hi all,
    we recently moved our Exchange 2003 to Office 365 using a Hybrid Exchange 2010 to migrate the users.
    the migration is complete and we have kept the Exchange 2010 Hybrid Edition running to enable us to mail enable new AD users after the DirSync has synchronized the user to the tenant.
    has anyone used this limited version of Exchange as an smtp relay for network devices, copiers etc?
    This topic first appeared in the Spiceworks Community

  • ICal repeating events become invisible if using Exchange 2010

    I recently upgraded from Exchange 2007 server to Exchange 2010.
    I had PREVIOUSLY been impressed by well iCal under Snow Leopard worked with Exchange Server. Everything was great. But, after upgrading to Exch 2010, many of my repeating calendar items became invisible in iCal.
    I did some searching on the Internet, and found I am not alone. My service provider support desk was also able to reproduce on their end.
    Steps:
    Connect to an Exchange 2010 account using Snow Leopard iCal.
    RESULT: All repeating calendar with end dates will be missing.
    Workaround: Remove the end date, or use a fixed number of repetitions rather than and end date.
    Another Workaround: Get Entourage to sync to Exchange, then get Entourage to sync with iCal. OK, but there seems to be some bugs there too where things don't always sync right.
    Since most people use repeating events, Mac users should avoid upgrading to Exchange 2010 for now.
    Message was edited by: davidlbangs

    It's a time zone issue. checkhttps://discussions.apple.com/message/10108361#10108361

  • Recover mails from Exchange 2010 EDB File

    Hi, 
    We had a issue with our Exchange 2010 and had to restore to a different server.
    There Is some mails that went missing.
    i Need to restore from another backup but cant drop the existing mailboxes.
    So i was thinking of exporting mailboxes with issues to PST files and import on users outlook to sync or if i can merge the mailboxed with EDB file....
    Exporting to pst would prob be safer...
    Thanks

    It is all documented on Technet. First hit on a Google search for Recovery Database Exchange 2010 takes you here:
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd876954.aspx
    Simon.
    Simon Butler, Exchange MVP
    Blog |
    Exchange Resources | In the UK?
    Hire Me.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Printing a PDF document using SMARTFORMS

    What is the easiest way to print a PDF document from an ABAP program?  I have the data in the following formats: Binary (XSTRING) String (from function module HR_KR_XSTRING_TO_STRING) OTF What format can I use in a smartform to print the PDF in the b

  • Datatype mapping problem

    Hi I've have a table with column with int4[] as data type. I have a problem with setting the type of corresponding entity bean field. I still have a message about not proper datatypes - byte array instead of integer[]. To be precise, message is: java

  • Weird behavior with Ctrl-Tab

    Dear members, (Forms 6i c/s) I have two tab canvases in one form. For each one, the first tab page is a master list, and the second one is a single-record detail block. I try to prevent the user from going to the second tab page if the list is empty,

  • Links/Graphics are editable

    When exporting All Stories from InDesign to InCopy, you can still edit graphics in InCopy. Isn't that a bug?

  • Can't complete the download of the Acrobat createpdf desktop printer

    I purchased the convert a file to pdf plan, it said I needed to download the Acrobat createpdf desktop printer but it wouldn't complete the download because of the printer configuration.  I can't understand what I need to do