Unsynchronized data between ECC and BW

Hi Experts,
I have a table in ECC6 which data is supposed to move to BW.
Everything is fine except some records from that table is not found in BW side even in the PSA table.
Where should I check to find the root cause of this program?
Thanks,
Duy

Hi,
What is the type of your datasource for this dataload. If its a generic datasource based on function module, please check the code to see if there is some restriction while fetching the data.
If its generic delta datasource for which delta field is numeric field, then check if the records that have not got fetched are for the values lesser than the pointer shown in RSA7 because the deltas will get fetched for values higher than the value in pointer.
For standard datasource, I dont think there would be any modification but still you can go in CMOD and check whether in customer exit particular data records are being deleted.
Hope this helps.

Similar Messages

Issue in CIF data between ECC to APO

Hi Experts,
We have ECC and APO system in our landscape. we have configured CIF and transferred data between ECC and APO however after ECC system refresh CIF configuration is not working. we verified and reconfigured the CIF configuration but still no luck.
strange thing is, while sending the data for e.g vendor from ECC to APO, there is no error reported. It displays successful in both qRFC trace files but the transferred data is nt reflecting in APO system.
There is no system run time error, no errors in system log (SM21), no logs in SLG1 application log, no erros in qRFC trace files.
we have enabled RFC user trace but can't conclude the issue. could you please anyone let me know where we can check the error log or how to resolve this?
Outbund Queue logs from ECC:
QTYPE :OUTBOUND/S
DATE       TIME     CLIENT     USER            QDATE      QTIME    BJOB       QEVENT
        TID                              ORGTID                        QSTATE
    DEST                                    ERRMESS
20.03.2015 17:44:56 300             20.03.2015 17:44:56 N          N
        0A1A01720F70550C0F4019E7                                       SENDING
    <SID>CLNT300
LUWCNT   QNAME                    FNAM
00000001 CFLDSHQCLNT300_0014      /SAPAPO/CIF_LOC_INBOUND
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
                                      QTYPE :OUTBOUND/S
DATE       TIME     EXETIME CLIENT USER            QDATE      QTIME    BJOB    QEVENT
        TID                              ORGTID                        QSTATE
    DEST                                    ERRMESS
20.03.2015 17:44:57 00:00:01 300          20.03.2015 17:44:56 N       N
        0A1A01720F70550C0F4019E7                                       CONFIRMD
    <SID>CLNT300
LUWCNT   QNAME                    FNAM
00000001 CFLDSHQCLNT300_0014      /SAPAPO/CIF_LOC_INBOUND
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
                                      QTYPE :OUTBOUND/S
DATE       TIME     CLIENT     USER            QDATE      QTIME    BJOB       QEVENT
        TID                              ORGTID                        QSTATE
    DEST                                    ERRMESS
20.03.2015 17:44:57 300             20.03.2015 17:44:56 N          N
        0A1A01720F70550C0F4019E8                                       SENDING
    <SID>CLNT300
LUWCNT   QNAME                    FNAM
00000001 CFLDSHQCLNT300_0014      /SAPAPO/CIF_GEN_EVENT
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
                                      QTYPE :OUTBOUND/S
DATE       TIME     EXETIME CLIENT USER            QDATE      QTIME    BJOB    QEVENT
        TID                              ORGTID                        QSTATE
    DEST                                    ERRMESS
20.03.2015 17:44:57 00:00:00 300          20.03.2015 17:44:56 N       N
        0A1A01720F70550C0F4019E8                                       CONFIRMD
    <SID>CLNT300
LUWCNT   QNAME                    FNAM
00000001 CFLDSHQCLNT300_0014      /SAPAPO/CIF_GEN_EVENT
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Inbound Queue trace log from APO:
QTYPE :INBOUND
DATE       TIME     CLIENT     USER            QDATE      QTIME    BJOB       QEVENT
        TID                              ORGTID                        QSTATE
    DEST                                    ERRMESS
20.03.2015 17:39:48 300                20.03.2015 17:44:56 N          N
        0A1A01720F70550C0F4019E7                                       SENDED
    <SID>CLNT300
LUWCNT   QNAME                    FNAM
00000001 CFLDSHQCLNT300_0014      /SAPAPO/CIF_LOC_INBOUND
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
                                       QTYPE :INBOUND
DATE       TIME     EXETIME CLIENT USER            QDATE      QTIME    BJOB    QEVENT
        TID                              ORGTID                        QSTATE
    DEST                                    ERRMESS
20.03.2015 17:39:48 17:39:48 300             20.03.2015 17:44:56 N       N
        0A1A01720F70550C0F4019E7                                       FINISH
    <SID>CLNT300
LUWCNT   QNAME                    FNAM
00000001 CFLDSHQCLNT300_0014      /SAPAPO/CIF_LOC_INBOUND
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
                                       QTYPE :INBOUND
DATE       TIME     CLIENT     USER            QDATE      QTIME    BJOB       QEVENT
        TID                              ORGTID                        QSTATE
    DEST                                    ERRMESS
20.03.2015 17:39:48 300                20.03.2015 17:44:56 N          N
        0A1A01720F70550C0F4019E8                                       SENDED
    <SID>CLNT300
LUWCNT   QNAME                    FNAM
00000001 CFLDSHQCLNT300_0014      /SAPAPO/CIF_GEN_EVENT
                                       QTYPE :INBOUND
DATE       TIME     EXETIME CLIENT USER            QDATE      QTIME    BJOB    QEVENT
        TID                              ORGTID                        QSTATE
    DEST                                    ERRMESS
20.03.2015 17:39:48 17:39:48 300             20.03.2015 17:44:56 N       N
        0A1A01720F70550C0F4019E8                                       FINISH
    <SID>CLNT300
LUWCNT   QNAME                    FNAM
00000001 CFLDSHQCLNT300_0014      /SAPAPO/CIF_GEN_EVENT
                                       QTYPE :INBOUND
DATE       TIME     EXETIME CLIENT USER            QDATE      QTIME    BJOB    QEVENT
        TID                              ORGTID                        QSTATE
    DEST                                    ERRMESS
20.03.2015 17:39:48 00:00:00 300             20.03.2015 17:44:56 N       N
        0A1A019D23F8550C0E0C2559         0A1A01720F70550C0F4019E7      RUNNING
    <SID>CLNT300
LUWCNT   QNAME                    FNAM
00000001 CFLDSHQCLNT300_0014      /SAPAPO/CIF_LOC_INBOUND
                                       QTYPE :INBOUND
DATE       TIME     EXETIME CLIENT USER            QDATE      QTIME    BJOB    QEVENT
        TID                              ORGTID                        QSTATE
    DEST                                    ERRMESS
20.03.2015 17:39:48 00:00:00 300             20.03.2015 17:44:56 N       N
        0A1A019D23F8550C0E0C2559         0A1A01720F70550C0F4019E7      FINISH
    <SID>CLNT300
LUWCNT   QNAME                    FNAM
00000001 CFLDSHQCLNT300_0014      /SAPAPO/CIF_LOC_INBOUND
                                       QTYPE :INBOUND
DATE       TIME     EXETIME CLIENT USER            QDATE      QTIME    BJOB    QEVENT
        TID                              ORGTID                        QSTATE
    DEST                                    ERRMESS
20.03.2015 17:39:48 00:00:00 300             20.03.2015 17:44:56 N       N
        0A1A019D23F8550C0E0C2559         0A1A01720F70550C0F4019E7      CONFIRMD
    <SID>CLNT300
LUWCNT   QNAME                    FNAM
00000001 CFLDSHQCLNT300_0014      /SAPAPO/CIF_LOC_INBOUND
                                       QTYPE :INBOUND
DATE       TIME     EXETIME CLIENT USER            QDATE      QTIME    BJOB    QEVENT
        TID                              ORGTID                        QSTATE
    DEST                                    ERRMESS
20.03.2015 17:39:48 00:00:00 300             20.03.2015 17:44:56 N       N
        0A1A019D23F8550C0E0C255A         0A1A01720F70550C0F4019E8      RUNNING
    <SID>CLNT300
LUWCNT   QNAME                    FNAM
00000001 CFLDSHQCLNT300_0014      /SAPAPO/CIF_GEN_EVENT
                                       QTYPE :INBOUND
DATE       TIME     EXETIME CLIENT USER            QDATE      QTIME    BJOB    QEVENT
        TID                              ORGTID                        QSTATE
    DEST                                    ERRMESS
20.03.2015 17:39:48 00:00:00 300             20.03.2015 17:44:56 N       N
        0A1A019D23F8550C0E0C255A         0A1A01720F70550C0F4019E8      FINISH
    <SID>CLNT300
LUWCNT   QNAME                    FNAM
00000001 CFLDSHQCLNT300_0014      /SAPAPO/CIF_GEN_EVENT
                                       QTYPE :INBOUND
DATE       TIME     EXETIME CLIENT USER            QDATE      QTIME    BJOB    QEVENT
        TID                              ORGTID                        QSTATE
    DEST                                    ERRMESS
20.03.2015 17:39:48 00:00:00 300             20.03.2015 17:44:56 N       N
        0A1A019D23F8550C0E0C255A         0A1A01720F70550C0F4019E8      CONFIRMD
    <SID>CLNT300
LUWCNT   QNAME                    FNAM
00000001 CFLDSHQCLNT300_0014      /SAPAPO/CIF_GEN_EVENT
Thanks and regards,
Pradeep

Hello Pardeep,
Please check the setting of SMQS and SMQR for CF and client registration
these entries, the field 'TYPE' is set to 'R'.
QIN scheduler may be available for every client if you are working in this client with registered inbound queues.
Choose Edit->Activate scheduler from the menu (available in both SMQR and SMQS)
During processing in dialog work processes, the system uses a parallel RFC to restart the registered inbound queues. For this, you can use transaction RZ12 to specify a group of application servers and dialog work processes that are allowed to use a QIN scheduler. You must use transaction SMQR to assign the group name to the relevant QIN scheduler.
Different parameters in SMQR are explained in note 1579728. The explanation for SMQS is similar
Also try the report RSQIWKEX
Best Regards,
R.Brahmankar

Data Inconsistency for 0EMPLOYEE between ECC and BI

Hi,
We do a full load to 0EMPLOYEE using 0EMPLOYEE_ATTR from ECC. There were records deleted for lot of employees (some action types) in ECC. This has caused data inconsistency for 0EMPLOYEE master data (time-dependent) between ECC and BI. In BI we have more records for these employees (Additional records have time-dependent range that were deleted from ECC but still exist in BI). These employee records are already being used in lot of InfoProviders. Is there an efficient way to fix this issue? One of the solution is to delete data from all InfoProviders and then delete from Master data for 0EMPLOYEE, but the deletion of employee records can happen quite often, so we don't want to take this route. Also, I tried to re-organize master data attributes for 0EMPLOYEE through process chain, but that didn't work either.
Message was edited by:
Ripel Desai

Hi Ripel,
I share your pain. This is one of the real pains of Time-Dependant master data in BW. I have been in your exact position and the only way round the issue for me was to clear out all the cubes that used 0EMPLOYEE and then delete and re-load 0EMPLOYEE data.
I know this responce doesn't help you but at least you are not alone.
Regards,
Pete
http://www.teklink.co.uk

Synching the data between MDM and ECC

Hi All,
We have been on SAP MDM Central Master Data Management scenario for more then a year now. In the pas we have seen many issues ike - Syndication server failures, idoc failures due to which the data is not 100% in synch between MDM and ECC.
Though we are working on the idoc failure tracking process but my question is this -
I need to create an automated program which runs on a weekly basis finds the data which is out of synch in MDM and FEP and gives me the same. So the logic should be something like this - Pick up the records updated during the last week in MDM, look for those records in ECC. Compare field by field and give me the delta.
Since it is a central master data management scenario hence there are cases in which records are created in MDM but not present in ECC may be because of syndication failures or idoc failures.
Any one worked n a similar sort of program/logic? Kindly let me know your experiences as well in efforts to keep the data in synch.
Regards,
Indraveer

Hello Indraveer
Yes you can do it.
You can configure exchange between ECC and MDM by schedule directly or through PI
or
SAP MDM 7.1 has own API for ABAP, JAVA, .NET. (5.5 for ABAP,JAVA, .COM)
That may be abap transaction or java(.net) application is working by schedule.
more about MDM API you can read here:
ABAP
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nwmdm71/helpdata/en/48/edff445128209ce10000000a42189d/frameset.htm
JAVA and .NET
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nwmdm71/helpdata/en/13/041975d8ce4d4287d5205816ea955a/frameset.htm
JavaDocs
http://help.sap.com/javadocs/MDM71/index.html
Regards
Kanstantsin Chernichenka

Communication between ECC and CRM

Hello,
I am in phase of showing communication between SAP CRM 5.0 and ECC 6.0.
I am struggling with finding some simple transactions which are common in both, with which I can show correct connectivity between ECC and CRM.
I need to save some data from CRM and access the same via transaction within ECC, save some data via ECC and access it via CRM. I already established RFC link between ECC and CRM.
Probably communication between SD module of ECC with CRM.
Can you please help me out with this, a clue/correct direction will be of very helpful. Basically I want to know, what transaction I can use for same.
Any help is really appreciated.
Thanks
-Vishal

Hi Glenn,
I followed all steps in document mentioned above. In the end during execution of transaction I selected appropriate source and destination, when I click start transfer objects, it gets stuck in waiting phase.
Among those steps I was not able to perform step#10. Creating Subscriptions for OLTP. My ERP is not displaying this option under subscription wizard. Should it be reason for not starting transfer ? I also do not see ERP logon screen when I select transfer.
My another question is when transfer will complete, where I'll be able to see transferred objects within ERP database ?
Thanks
-Vishal

Best communication between ECC and PI

Hi All
SAP is planning to adapt Enterprise Service Architecture (ESA) in the journey towards Service Oriented Architecture (SOA).
We are working on new implementation project. We have many asynchrounous scenarios. We would like to configure acknowledgements and also like to handle errors effectively.
Could you please suggest which communication between ECC and PI is preferrable?
(Webservices, IDoc, BAPI or RFC)
Thanks
Sai

IDoc, BAPI , rfc - all can be used for seamless communication between ECC and PI. It is totallu dependant on the application and way information is exchanged. For master and transactional data idoc are prefered as for the acknowledgements supported by it. Not sure how effeciently we can handle system and appl ack incase of bapi/rfc. but at the same time idoc will be a drawback for sync comunication where rfc/bapi is preferd. It is SOA or ESA the concepts build in SAP are targeted to serve the enterprise needs where idoc,bapi/rfc are used for servicing the business unit objectives

Optimize the performance of the RFC call between ECC and CRM

Hi,
We are planning to extract sales orders, sales activites and service orders to dispaly it on the PDF factsheet of the account.
As of now, the PDF factsheet takes a long time to retrieve the data from ECC to CRM. Can you please suggest us on ways to optimize the performance of the RFC call between ECC and CRM.
Thanks in advance,
Vamsi.

Hello,
[SAP Note 636906 |https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/636906]is quite useful here.
Many times, the performance is poor due to function module CRM_CCKPT_EXPORTSUMMARY. This function module gets the customer number, the sales organization and the fact sheet view. If in CRM customizing, you use complete view (001), then all the views in ERP including all the info blocks will be retrieved, which will cause performance issue.
To solve the issue, please use a limited view to retrieve the data from ERP - especially a view, which does not contain info block 013.
Hope it helps
Joaquin

Withdrawal Qty don't match between ECC and APO

Hi Experts.
I am facing a discrepancy for Withdrawal Qty between ECC and APO before delivery/PGI creation.
In ECC T.code MD63 I am able to see the withdrawal Qty as expected but in APO a duplicated withdrawal Qty is being created. But this is not happening for all materials, only some specifics materials. I did a check in Material Master data and I have no found any difference between a material that is working and one that is not working...
Can please somebody explain me why APO is dobling the Withdrawal Qty.
Thanks a Lot
Daniel Campos.

Please check wthether you have dp index duplication in this problem.
Please follow the process.
For this process , you need to follow these steps .
1. From the table /SAPAPO/MATKEY , find the product id of the product for which you feel there is problem .
2. Find the location id from table /SAPAPO/LOC for the location.
3. Use the above found 'product id' and 'location id' to find the dp index in table "/SAPAPO/DP_HEAD " .
Enter the planning version ' 000 ' in this table . If there is some error you will find multiple entries of the 'dp index ' in this table for the ' 000 ' planning version. If error found use below program to delete the dp index .
4. Precaution should be taken before we delete the 'Dp Index' as the consumption history is lost due to this . In the program 'Z_DEL_WITHDRAWL' there are 2 check boxes " update " and " list ". List will show the DP index and update will delete it. Need to extremely careful in this program as wrong selection will cause problem .

Why replicate Master Data between CRM and IS-U?????

Hello colleagues,
I am at a customer who is already replicating Business Partner and Contract Accounts between CRM 5.0 and IS-U (ECC 6.0).
He is using CRM IC WinClient where most of the processes are implemented as transaction calls in IS-U.
There is a possibility to replicate all objects (Accounts, Connection Objects and Installations) but what is the purpose of doing it.
Could anybody tell me what is the advantage of replicating all objects and having them redundant?
Why to replicate?
I just found information on how to replicate but not why.
Thank you very much for your help in advance,
Edgar Kauter

Hi All,
The major thing is we should not use ISU as stativ and CRM dynalic system. As we all aware When SAP is launching any module or technology its beleives in re-usabilty.
Now the issue data replecation between CRM and ISU-
1. In a utility market if the customer,retailer and the network operator initiate any business flow they should start with CRM as CRM is handling FOP part.It means CRM has not only build only for ISU.
2. In ISU before billing so many things is getting triggered - like new connecion,transfer,move-in,move-out etc....these process cant be done with the CRM business module as I mentioned earlier CRM is not only designed for IS-U
So for a smoother process and with proper business SAP introduced CRM IS-U.
Without replacting the data between CRM and IS-U we cant process the steps which will at last billed a customer.
Regards.
Abinash

Events limit can only be dates between 1 and 9 on the day field

Im an student, and im trying to put my timetable into ical as did last year
it goes ok, i set it up to repit every week mondays lessons for example
but when i am trying to set up a limit for this event to repit itself ical only allows me to
put a date between 1 and 9 on the day field.
Does anyone know why is that?
sorry is my english is not so good im from spain and i might not explained very well
thank you

The x86 architecture has a standard formatting for disks that uses up to four primary partitions on a disk. On DOS or UNIX, you can view the partitions with 'fdisk'.
This is layer that Windows and Linux tends to use for filesystems.
Solaris though uses only one of those partitions for its own use (marking it a Solaris partition) and places a label similar to that on a SPARC disk (VTOC). So within the single x86 partition are several further subdivisions (slices).
On solaris, the disk might be /dev/dsk/c0t0d0. You could access one of the Solaris (VTOC) slices as /dev/dsk/c0t0d0s0. As far as I know, Linux does not understand how to address the Solaris VTOC slices (If this isn't true, I'd love to know what the syntax for doing so is).
You'd access the (non-Solaris) x86 parititions like /dev/dsk/c0t0d0p1 or so. While Linux can address extended x86 partitions, Solaris can only address primary partitions.
Darren

Communication between ECC and SCM via XI

I am trying to set up the scenario 'Purchase_Order_Processing' between
ECC and SCM using XI. The SCM content for XI has been loaded into XI
and this scenario is included in the content.
We are running the following:
ECC - Version 5.0 - 640 SP level 12
XI - Version 3.0 - 640 SP Level 14
SCM - 4.10 - 640 SP Level 12
The connectivity between the systems has been set up as described in the configuration guides. On sending an IDOC (basic type ORDERS05) into XI I get the following error message 'Http server code 500 reason Internal Server Errorexplanation Error during parsing of SOAP header'.
The Error XML is as follows:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
- 
- <SAP:Error xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30"
xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"
SOAP:mustUnderstand="">
<SAP:Category>XIAdapter</SAP:Category>
<SAP:Code area="PLAINHTTP_ADAPTER">ATTRIBUTE_SERVER</SAP:Code>
<SAP:P1>500</SAP:P1>
<SAP:P2>Internal Server Error</SAP:P2>
<SAP:P3>Error during parsing of SOAP header</SAP:P3>
<SAP:P4 />
<SAP:AdditionalText />
<SAP:ApplicationFaultMessage namespace="" />
<SAP:Stack>Http server code 500 reason Internal Server Error
explanation Error during parsing of SOAP header</SAP:Stack>
<SAP:Retry>M</SAP:Retry>
</SAP:Error>
Any assistance would be much appreciated.

Sravya,
Yes this an IDOC to http scenario. There was no dump at the receiver end. I've found out what was causing the problem - I was using an adapter type of HTTP. It should have been of type 'XI'. I've altered this and it works. Hopefully this will resolve your problem Vinod.
Richard

How to sinck data between production and R12 instance

Hi,
I am working on Oracle Apps up-gradation project.
Now I have upgrade 11.5.7 to R12 (12.0.4) successfully. I started up-gradation task with 1 May of production data (backup) on new machine.
Client wants to live R12 from 1/August/2009.
Please suggest how to sinck data between production and R12 instance.
Thanks
Anup

Hi,
It is not possible to do what you propose (sync data from an 11.5.7 system to a 12.0.4 system). You will need to re-run the upgrade against the August 1 data, following your original upgrade procedures.
Regards,
John P.
http://only4left.jpiwowar.com

Block Demand Depend Interfaces between ECC and SCM

Hello All.
Is there a way to block only interfaces of Dependent Demand between ECC and SCM.
I need to do this because ECC writes over my plan in SCM.
Thanks and Best Regards

Hello PrasunM
For example:
When you create an Order on finished material, SCM using PP method "3 - Cover Ind. Requ." creates DepReq on raw material.
SCM using CIF sends PlOrd, PrdOrd and DepReq to ECC. I want send only PlOrd and PrdOrd, DepReq i only need in SCM side.
Best Regards.

IDocs have disappeared between ECC and PI

Hi All,
A couple of days ago 3 idocs went missing between ECC and PI.
That day 293 idocs of the same message type were sent to the same partner through PI. In PI we only found 290. The 3 IDocs were sent in the same second in the early afternoon. All IDocs before and after were processed correctly.
The IDocs are unknown in IDX5 and in Runtime Workbench on PI.
The idocs were not in SM58.
I found them in WE05, with the correct status. The status update from status = 01 to 30 to 03 took place in the same second.
25 seconds later, new IDocs of the same message type were created and processed successfully by PI.
At the time the idocs disappeared there were no problems with either ECC or PI, as far as we know.
The interface is live for more than 2 years. In the meantime no changes have taken place.
I have read the links below
Finding missing IDocs
Interface Troubleshooting Basics
It's a mystery to me. Where have those idocs gone?
Anybody any idea?
Kind Regards
Edmond Paulussen

Hi Edmond,
On the SAP PI system have a look in transaction IDX5. Take the IDoc number that you could not find in PI and search them in IDX5.
If you cannot find those IDoc in IDX5 then they never reached PI.
Regards,
Jannus Botha

How to pass series of dates (between startdate and enddate) to subreport, which takes only one date as parameter

Relatively new to Microsoft report services. I have created a report which takes a single parameter named 'SelectedDate'. This report runs fine (uses complex query of hours of the selected date and complex joins & aggregate calculations between SQL
database tables). I created a new report with two parameters, namely, StartDate and EndDate. Also created a sql stored procedure which gives all dates between StartDate and EndDate. Added subreport to this report which calls my first report and defined 'SelectedDate'
parameter to get the value as "=First(Fields!dt.Value, "DataSet1") - where dt is the resultset of procedure called in DataSet1. When I run this report, in the subreport, all I see is the report for 'StartDate' which is the passed
value of the first parameter. I can't find a way to pass entire array of dates as parameter, to which user can browse forwards and backwards. Any idea? Thanks in advance for your help!

HI Visakh16..Never mind my comment..I tried it again. This time I went to the completion of previewing..and noticed that the table with DataSet1 does display dates and first report underneath but once I click any other date, it displays the subreport on
full page and navigation back arrow (with hint 'back to Parent Report) solution is not bad..so unless you a way to achieve my desired layout mentioned above - I am good for now! Thanks for your pointer in right direction!
One small observation for thread readers: When I published the report to the report server, the back button (back to Parent Report) which was available to me at design time, is not displayed at client's browser. Upon checking pertinent threads, concluded
that this is known issue for years and recommendation I concluded from various threads is: Use back button of browser and it should (& did) keep the parent report page, with table with selected dates intact. A few have noticed different behaviour
for older browser versions.

Unsynchronized data between ECC and BW

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for