Validation for User to Restrict vendor

Hi Experts,
My client wants that some users can only display one vendor account in vendor Line item / Balance reports and they are not accepting Authorization group update in vendor Master. Can you please suggest me that how can I do validation in OB28 for this requirement.
Thanks in advance.
Regards
Abul

So we thought we can use object F_LFA1_BEK. We entered an authorization group (LFA1-BEGRU) to this vendor and added this group to F_LFA1_BEK. So far so good.
Problem is now that it is still possible to access all vendors where no authorization group is maintained in the vendors master record. (No authorization group is the default case and it is not possible to add another one the other vendors)
Is it possible to achieve this with F_LFA1_BEK or is there any other solution?

Similar Messages

Validation for Document type in Vendor Invoice.

Dear All,
I need to restrict the user from posting vendor invoice other than document type KR. I thought of using validation with account type and posting key , but looking at more refined solution. Please suggest.
Thanks & Regards

Hi,
Yes, this can be acheived using an validation at accounting document level.
Validation must be like
If posting key is 31---Prerequisite: BSEG-BSCHL = '31'
then the doc type type should be KR---Check: BKPF-BLART = 'KR'
Else put one error message.
This will resolve your issue.
Thanks,
Srinu

Validation for User Status

Hi Experts,
Is there a way we can build validations on user statuses?
Here's the scenario: For ex- There are two statuses without status numbers - 1) X 2) Y
Is there a way we can restrict the user to select only one at a time i.e. either X or Y?
Note: We cannot use status numbers because of the nature of the user statuses (X and Y), it will be a manual check only no radio button.
Please Advice.
Arya
Edited by: Arya Singh on Dec 9, 2008 3:52 PM

txn OPSI
go to the check mode
exit tab
you can see some user exits there
e.g UFP01 etc
or use BADi to build the logic on save project (projectdef_save)

Defining Authorizations for User to restrict the data in report.

Hi Gurus,
I have no idea on authorization concept in BI. Please give me anyone steps to creating authorization objects, roles and profiles to restrict the data for users.
Ex.
i have functinal location info object checked as authorization relavent with below data.
FL001
FL002
FL003
FL004
FL005
FL006
FL007
FL008
FL009
We have users like below.
User1
User2
User3
Now, if User1 is analysing a report he can see only FL001, FL005, FL009 only, remaining have to be omited.
If User2 is analysing that report he can see only FL002, FL003, FL009. And like wise.
So, Please help me providing the completed steps. I have done somting but failed.
Thanks in advance
Peter.

Hello Peter,
Please go through the following links
Authorization :
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/59/fd8b41b5b3b45fe10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm
SAP Authorization Concept :
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/52/671285439b11d1896f0000e8322d00/frameset.htm
Thanks.
With regrads,
Anand Kumar

Code is only valid for users of store

Help....
Ive just gifted an app to my son as I often do and when he tries to redeem it it says "This code is only valid for customers of the Store".
Ive looked this up and normally it will involve someone from one country trying to gift an app to someone in another country but with me this is not the case.
My son lives in the same country, the same address everything.
The app was called Kick the buddy: Second kick
Can anyone please help
Thank you

Thanks to James, I have just had a reply saying that they do not know why this error has occured but they have refunded my purchase costs.
Good luck to anyone who has the same problem

Payment Block Validation for User group

Dear SAP Validation Expert,
We like to allow only selected FI users to change Payment Block to ' ' (Free for Payment) in tcode: FB02, FB03 and FBL1N.
Curently we have managed to block other un-selected users from changing the Payemnt block to Free for Payment.
But our issues are Other fields also NOT able from changing/maintaining. For example in FB02, user NOT able to change Payment Block (BSEG-ZLSPR) from 'B' to ' ' (Free for Payment) which is expected but user also NOT able to maintain other field such as Payment term(BSEG-ZTERM), Baseline date (BSEG-ZFBDT), Assignment (BSEG-ZUONR) and Text Field(BSEG-SGTXT).
Below is our Validation, please advice how to improve it so that other fields can be changed too. Your swift reply is very much appreciated.
Pre-requisite:
( ( SYST-TCODE = 'FB02' ) OR
( SYST-TCODE = 'FBL1N' ) OR
( SYST-TCODE = 'FB03' ) AND
( BSEG-ZLSPR = ' ' ) AND
SYST-UNAME <> 'HIS20083'
Check:
BSEG-ZLSPR <> ' '
Message: E: You have no authorization.

Hi,
In your Validation small change has to be done.
Pre-requisite:
SYST-TCODE = 'FB02' ) OR ( SYST-TCODE = 'FBL1N' ) OR ( SYST-TCODE = 'FB03' )
Check:
SYST-UNAME 'HIS20083' AND BSEG-ZLSPR = ' '
Message: E: You have no authorization.
Try in the above procedure.
Thanks
Goutam

Authorization for limited vendor for user in FBL1n

Hi,
I have certain user in my company, to whom, i want to give t-code FBL1N access. But for some vendors only.
Please let me know, how it can be done.

Hi Durga
As far as I see I can suggest you 2 options:
1. You can create a validation with sets for users and vendors. This way you can restrict to only the t-codes you want the restriction to apply
2. You can co-ordinate with BASIS to restrict using authorization object F_BKPF_BEK. You have to assign authorization group to vendors and give authorization to users for specific authorization groups. In this case, you cannot restrict only to FBL1N. The restriction would be applicable to all the transaction codes for the users where vendors are impacted.
Regards
Sowmya

Restrict GL / Cost Centre combinations for users/roles?

Hi,
Please could someone advise if it is possible to restrict Cost Centre and GL Account combinations during PO creation for specific users/roles?
For example:
Valid Combinations:
CC A1 GL 99
CC B2 GL 88
Scenarios:
Create PO with A1, 99 -> Allowed
Create PO with B2, 77 -> Not Allowed
I've found a related post, but not exactly my requirement - any other thoughts? Or has anyone done this themselves?
Authorisations - User Profile for purchasing - restrict by cost centre

Use the user exit MM06E005 to control the CC and G/L for user dependent.
to do that - ask ABAPer to create the custom table for user, CC and GL combination and let teh user exit read the combination from the table and give a error or warning based on your requirements.

On win 7 64 bit mozilla or IE 10 I get the following message This installation package could net be opened verify that the package exist and that you can access for contact the application vendor to verify this is a valid windows installer package I trie

I get this following message when installing the latest itunes on mozilla or IE10 was working on this machine before crash and reinstalled for HP disc I tried at leat 15 times firewall off /on microsoft essentials on/off on windows 7 64 bit see message
This installation package could net be opened verify thatthe package exist and that you can access for contact the application vendor to verify this is a valid windows installer package

If you are not already doing so, install from an Administrator account.
If you haven't already done so, download the iTunes Installer from:
http://www.apple.com/itunes/download/
Then right click on the installer and select "Run as Administrator." (Even though you are using an admin account).
If that doesn't work, try creating a new administrator account and installing from there.

P6 user name is not valid for connecting to the reporting database

No data is available because your P6 user name is not valid for connecting to the reporting database
I am getting above error in the following environment:
P6 running on wls instance 1.
BI Publisger running on wls instance 2
MS SQL server 2005
Note that the error appears when I clink on the 'Reports' tab in P6. My admin user on P6 has access to report/analyser modules.
To connect P6 to BI Publisher I am using 'PxRptUser' in the P6 configuration for Bi Publisher. I know as well that the WSDL URL is correct and I can test this in SoapUI tool.
In BI publisher I have created the PMDB data source using PxRprUser, and the test of this connection works.
(Because the report samples come with Oracle flavoured SQL that SQL server does not like, I have configured BI Publisher so I have just a single report left that sources it data from an xml file. This works in BI Publisher. It also helps me in that I do not need to add 'WHERE' clauses and parameters required for SQL server?)
Furthermore, using a DB tool, I can connect to my SQL server using PxRPTUser.
So why do I get the error above?
I picked up somewhere that I should not be adding users to BI Publisher. Funny enough, testing the 'login' method the BI Publisher exposes through its WSDL (as above) I noticed I HAD to create the user PxRptUser in BI publisher application itself (on top of PxRptUser in database) for the login web service to work with PxRptUser
That did not solve the connection between P6 and BI Publisher though. What am I missing ...
Edited by: user3674522 on 10/11/2011 20:16

Thought I found something but can't repliacte, som issue is still there:
Had a look at the wls instance logs where BI publisher is running, and the error I get is:
111111_023646955][][ERROR] javax.naming.NamingException: Unresolved naming: cn=admin, dc=user, dc=users, dc=principals at [cn=admin]
That user, admin, is the one I have used to access P6. Why is this passed on to BI Publisher? I thought the idea was that the PxRptUser set in BI Publisher configurations in P6 would be used?
Edited by: user3674522 on 10/11/2011 20:17

Validation for vendor for invoice Rs.20000

H expert
I would like to build a validation for one time vendor for which it should not allow invoice value for <20000
How to do it. Please suggest me a step by step config involved in this.Points will be rewarded.
sk

Better to write Validation :
Prereqisit:
BKPF-LIFNR>=1 AND BKPF-LIFNR<=100
**Check**
BSEG-WRBTR
and Write any Message what you want then SAVE
Go to OB28 and assign this validatin to our company code and active and SAVE
I hope this validation useful for you
If it will useful 4 u give rewards
Regards
TML

How to create a valid database User/Group for installing Linux 5,3

HI:
I am trying to install E-Business Suite on LINUX and gave me the following error report
Unable to validate Database User/Group :oralce /dba
Provide a valid Database User/Group for the installation.
when I was installiing on Windows, it did not gave me this error.
How do I have to crate a user/Group to install eBusiness on my Linux/
Please help
Ali

Hi user;
hi Ali;
Yes I run as a root userKeep using root
When I use the following at the terminal
It gave me a error message
" Provide a valid Database User/Group for the installation. "
Here is what I type at the terminalIts seems normal becouse u try to create same user!
root@vis groupadd dba
root@vis useradd -g dba -d /home/oracle vis
root@vis useradd -g dba -d /home/oracle oracle Try this plz:
groupadd dba << i think this group already created!
useradd -g dba -d /home/applmgr applmgr << for apps node
useradd -g dba -d /home/oramgr oramgr << for db node
As you notice we define 2 different user under /home path!
Regards
helios

Non-SysAdmins get error 18456 Severity 14 State 11 Login Failed for user _ Reason Token-based server access validation failed with an infrastructure error.

I have a SQL 2008 R2 system (10.50.4000) where I'm having problems connecting any user that is not a SysAdmin. Example: I setup a new SQL Login to use Windows Authentication and grant that user db_datareader on the target database. The user attempts
to connect using Excel client or Access or SQL Management Studio and receives Error 18456. The SQL Server Logs shows Error 18456 Severity 14 State 11 Login Failed for user _ Reason Token-based server access validation failed with an infrastructure error.
The strange part is that if I temporarily grant the user the sysadmin server role then the user can connect successfully and retrieve data. But, if I take away that sysadmin server role then the user can no longer connect but again receives the Error
18456 Severity 14 State 11 Login Failed for user _ Reason Token-based server access validation failed with an infrastructure error.
We've turned off UAC on the client machine to see if that was the problem, but no change.
I have dropped and re-added the user's SQL Login (and the related database user login info). No success.
The Ring Buffers output shows:
The Calling API Name: LookupAccountSidInternal
API Name: LookupAccountSid
Error Code: 0x534
Thanks for any help.
-Walt

Yes, you understand correctly. The user is logging onto a workstation (not the server) with a Windows Authenticated id. The user is using either Excel or Access or SSMS and connecting to the server using a Windows Authenticated SQL Login account.
If the account has sysadmin role (which is only for testing) then the connection is successful. If I take away sysadmin role from the account then the connection is unsuccessful and the SQL Server Log shows Error
18456 Severity 14 State 11 Login Failed for user _ Reason Token-based server access validation failed with an infrastructure error.
(SQL Authentication is not an option here. I must use Windows Authentication).
Any other troubleshooting assistance you can offer would be appreciated. Thanks.
-Walt

No valid requester found for user 0013 . BBP_EXTREQ_TRANSFER Posted: Jan

Hi,
We have a PDP scenario where a channel R/3 has the RFCUSER maintained and the link is established with the ECC6.0.
When we try to send the PR to SRM the message shows the the PR is transferred but gives an error in the SLG1 as
"No valid requester found for user 0013
Message no. BBP_BD002"
The SMQ1 status is ANORETRY
TYPE : A
ID : BBP_EXTREQ
NUMBER : 013
MESSAGE : Ext. requirement cannot be created, see application log.
If you have any solution please tell me,.
i am waiting for reply,
Thanks in advance.

Santosh,
In my recent experience this SLG1 error is usually due to the RFC user being either missing, locked or not having their password set.
Get your Basis person to check the RFC link relevant to the transfer process in TCode SM59.
Hope this helps
Allen Brooks
SRM BPO
Sunderland City Council

PR no created in SRM : No valid request Found for user 0013

Hi. I try Send PR from ECC6.0 to SRM 7.0
I appobed the PR in BACK end but SC does not created in SRM side.
in transaction SLG1 into SRM show the next message.
No valid requester found for user 0013 .
Previously made the next configurations
1.- IN ECC6.0 has the RFC with USER RFC creates in SRM system i check the connection and working ok.
2.- in PPOMA i created a new node of Unit Orgnizational to Entry channel .
3.- I created a new RFC user and was assigned to previous Unit Organizational
4- created a new local purcharse gruops and assigned the responsability for Entry channel and product categories are introduced.
some idea what is missing to set?

Hi,
Check the below threads
[No valid requester found for user 0013 . BBP_EXTREQ_TRANSFER Posted: Jan;
[No valid requester found for user 0013 . BBP_EXTREQ_TRANSFER;
[BBP_EXTREQ_TRANSFER - No valid requester found for user 0013;
regards,
MRao

Validation for User to Restrict vendor

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for