Version number of nbproject/configurations.xml

We are developing using Sun Studio on both 64 bit Red Hat and Fedora. It seems that after checking in the project from Fedora, specifically nbproject/configurations.xml, the Red Hat's Sun Studio is no longer able to read the project configurations xml file. Errors pop up saying "Unsupported prodject configuation version: 38. Only versions 0 thru 35 are supported." It is apparent that within the configurations.xml file the line
<configurationDescriptor version="35">
was changed to
<configurationDescriptor version="38">
After I get the error messages for the projects that Sun Studio tries to load, I get a message box that says
A java.lang.NullPointerException exception has occurred.
Details are
java.lang.NullPointerException
     at org.netbeans.modules.cnd.makeproject.NativeProjectProvider.addMyListener(NativeProjectProvider.java:68)
     at org.netbeans.modules.cnd.makeproject.NativeProjectProvider.addProjectItemsListener(NativeProjectProvider.java:124)
     at org.netbeans.modules.cnd.modelimpl.platform.ModelSupport.registerProjectListeners(ModelSupport.java:352)
     at org.netbeans.modules.cnd.modelimpl.csm.core.ProjectBase.ensureFilesCreated(ProjectBase.java:357)
     at org.netbeans.modules.cnd.modelimpl.csm.core.ProjectBase$2.run(ProjectBase.java:481)
     at org.netbeans.modules.cnd.modelimpl.csm.core.CodeModelRequestProcessor$1.run(CodeModelRequestProcessor.java:57)
     at org.openide.util.RequestProcessor$Task.run(RequestProcessor.java:499)
[catch] at org.openide.util.RequestProcessor$Processor.run(RequestProcessor.java:932)
It seems like the Fedora box has a later version of something, but they both have the same versions of Sun Studio and NetBeans. We ran all updates on the Red Hat machine.
Any ideas?
Thanks

Version 35 was created by Sun Studio 12 and version 38 by Sun Studio 12 ML release. The project has somehow been changed and saved using the Sun Studio 12 ML release. It is not enough that you use the same IDE version on both platforms, you will also need to use at least the Sun Studio 12 ML once the project has been upgraded. If you send me ([email protected]) your email address, I will send you some directions how you can solve this issue.

Similar Messages

AppManifest.xml is being generated with the wrong version number

I am having a interesting problem which is preventing me from submitting an update to my app to the Windows Phone Store. I have done this 100 times and something is wrong with visual studio building the .xap file. Steps I am taking:
Update all version references in project settings and appmanifestWM to 1.4.0.0
Build Release version
Copy .xap from /bin/release
Upload as an app update to windows phone dev site
What happens is that the current version of the app (1.3.1.0) is still listed as the version of the app that the submission page is parsing out of the version (1.4.0.0) .xap file. I unzipped the xap file and looked at the appmanifest files and found that
the AppManifest.xaml has the correct version number but the AppManifest.xml still has version 1.3.1.0. If anyone could help me resolve this issue it would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks for your reply. I believe it is a bug with my solution because I have now tried all of these steps on two computers and uploaded using two different browsers and I still get a AppManifest.xml file that has version 1.3.1.0. I will copy and paste the
unzipped code from the AppManifest.xml file.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<Package xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/appx/2010/manifest" xmlns:m2="http://schemas.microsoft.com/appx/2013/manifest" xmlns:m3="http://schemas.microsoft.com/appx/2014/manifest" xmlns:mp="http://schemas.microsoft.com/appx/2014/phone/manifest" xmlns:build="http://schemas.microsoft.com/developer/appx/2012/build" IgnorableNamespaces="build">

<Identity Name="50523CameronStair.MyDebts" Publisher="CN=FA4BA529-B82F-4A0F-A35C-6700BC51B3E1" Version="1.3.1.0" ProcessorArchitecture="neutral" />
<mp:PhoneIdentity PhoneProductId="c805a27c-951f-4c0d-a831-1126f9a70563" PhonePublisherId="51beaec0-db37-4002-81de-5e138a756b34" />
<Properties>
<DisplayName>MyDebtsApp</DisplayName>
<PublisherDisplayName>Cameron Stair</PublisherDisplayName>
<Logo>Assets\StoreLogo.png</Logo>
</Properties>
<Prerequisites>
<OSMinVersion>6.3.1</OSMinVersion>
<OSMaxVersionTested>6.3.1</OSMaxVersionTested>
</Prerequisites>
<Resources>
<Resource Language="EN-US" />
</Resources>
<Applications>
<Application Id="App" Executable="AGHost.exe" EntryPoint="MainPage.xaml">
<m3:VisualElements DisplayName="My Debts" Square150x150Logo="Assets\SquareTile150x150.png" Square44x44Logo="Assets\Logo.png" Description="A debt tracker app." ForegroundText="light" BackgroundColor="#464646" ToastCapable="false">
<m3:DefaultTile Square71x71Logo="Assets\SquareTile71x71.png"></m3:DefaultTile>
<m3:SplashScreen Image="Assets\SplashScreen.png" />
</m3:VisualElements>
<Extensions>
<Extension Category="windows.backgroundTasks" EntryPoint="AgHost.BackgroundTask">
<BackgroundTasks>
<Task Type="systemEvent" />
</BackgroundTasks>
</Extension>
</Extensions>
</Application>
</Applications>
<Extensions>
<Extension Category="windows.activatableClass.inProcessServer">
<InProcessServer>
<Path>AgHostSvcs.dll</Path>
<ActivatableClass ActivatableClassId="AgHost.BackgroundTask" ThreadingModel="both" />
</InProcessServer>
</Extension>
</Extensions>
<Capabilities>
<m3:Capability Name="contacts" />
</Capabilities>
<build:Metadata>
<build:Item Name="TargetFrameworkMoniker" Value="WindowsPhone,Version=v8.1" />
<build:Item Name="VisualStudio" Version="12.0" />
<build:Item Name="VisualStudioEdition" Value="Microsoft Visual Studio Professional 2013" />
<build:Item Name="OperatingSystem" Version="6.3.9600.16384 (winblue_rtm.130821-1623)" />
<build:Item Name="Microsoft.Build.AppxPackage.dll" Version="12.0.31101.0" />
<build:Item Name="ProjectGUID" Value="{C805A27C-951F-4C0D-A831-1126F9A70563}" />
<build:Item Name="MSAdvertising" Version="6.1" />
<build:Item Name="MakePri.exe" Version="6.3.9600.17298 (winblue.141024-1500)" />
</build:Metadata>
</Package>
As you can see the package version being generated is wrong. Can you explain where exactly in the solution that value is taken from? I thought it was from WMAppManifest but I could be wrong.
Edit: In looking at the code above and then rereading what I wrote I realized my blaring error. I completely forgot that Silverlight 8.1 apps have an appxmanifest as well and that data is drawn from that as well as WMAppManifest. I never updated the version
in that appxmanifest. Thank you for the help and I apologize for my stupidity.

Dynamically configure build specification version number

I have several build specifications in the same project under the same version control and I base my version numbers in part on my revision number:
<Major>.<Minor>.<Revision>
Right now, I'm keeping the full number in a text file which is distributed with all build specifactions. However, I notice the build specification configuration diaglogue contains an option to execute a VI before the build. I'm wondering if a VI executed at this stage can somehow edit the version number within the build specification that called it, such that I don't have to manually change the version number in every build spec, every time I want to build one.
Are there any canned functions that let you edit build specification things like version numbers?

Hi Kgolden and A. Zaatari,
Maybe it's not a current feature (I have to believe a NI Engineer ) but it's possible to do it.
I made a VI that automatically creates Build and Installer specifications and also changes their configuration (like name, path, and version number).
So, here is how:
- all this information are stored in the project file My_Project.lvproj
- My_Project.lvproj is actually a !!! XML file !!!
- Make a small VI that search in the XML for the following lines/properties:
      (1) App_fileVersion.build
      (2) App_fileVersion.major
      (3) App_fileVersion.minor
      (4) App_fileVersion.patch
For the App_fileVersion.build it should look like :<Property Name="App_fileVersion.build" Type="Int">115</Property>. Search for the pattern and change the value 115. Do the same for all four of them.
Pay attention!! After you change this value you have to restart (close and than open) the Project in order to apply changes. This can also be done automatically by using LabView Application invoke and property node: Invoke Node: Project/Close + App/Open.LV Document/Path. Be carefull that you should do this from a VI that is not added to the project.
Regards,
Paul

The configuration file did not contain well formed AppV configuration XML - When using Office 2013 ODT package

All,
I'm experiencing an issue where when using the Office 2013 package pulled down from ODT, that if I try to change the locations of either InfoPath Filler 2013 or Publisher 2013 from the default of Microsoft Office 2013 then I receive the message "The
configuration file did not contain well formed AppV configuration XML. Please check the management server event log for more information". If I check Applications and Services\Microsoft\AppV\Server-Management\Admin the error displayed there is "An
error was encountered parsing dynamic configuration file '0'. However I am able to change the shortcut location for all other applications except the above 2. I've tried redownloading the files using the ODT and also changing the version number (so far I've
tried both the 15.0.4631.1002 and 15.0.4659.1001 with the same result).
As all I'm interested in so far is having a package which contains Visio and Project I've tried following the article to exclude all the other Office elements:
http://technet.microsoft.com/library/jj219426(v=office.15).aspx#BKMK_ExcludeAppElement. However the package looks to be the same and when I load it into the management console all the options and elements to Office 2013 are available like they were before
when I hadn't set the exclude tags so I'm not sure whether the ExcludeApp parameters actually work correctly.
This then brings me onto the 3rd issue I've experienced. I have a group for the Visio users and I've set custom security for them to have Visio delivered to them but not Project and then a seperate group for just Project users who will have Project delivered
to them but not have Visio. When testing this sometimes seems to work but other times it seems to trip out and a user just in the Project or Visio group will get all of the Office 2013 applications and under the default location of Microsoft Office 2013. When
trying to spot correlation with this it appears random and can happen to any user on any device. We have sequenced a few applications ourselves where different parts are needed for different users and we have successfully managed this using different security
groups for different applications, just as I'm trying here with Office 2013.
Has anyone else experienced the issue with the "did not contain well formed XML" as at the start of the post and how were you able to resolve this? Also has anyone any advice on how to troubleshoot the issue with the security seeming to trip out
and publish all applications within a package to a user regardless of whether they are in the correct group or not?
The management / publishing servers are 5.0.1224.0 which is SP1 HF4 and the clients are on SP2 HF5.
Thanks

Nicke,
The config files are UTF-8. I did find the same article as yourself, however when searching for the value ‘TakeoverExtensionPointsFrom46=’ within either of the configuration.xml files that text isn’t found.
No sinister reason not to share the file used, just it’s the same structure as referenced in the article:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dn745895(v=office.15).aspx. The only difference being that I’m using ProPlusVolume and I’ve set a version number (which is the October
2014 update). I’ve even looked to follow the above example as closely as possible in just using the ExcludeApp ID of Access and InfoPath, just to try and prove the process. However I still get the usual full package. The version of the Click-to-Run setup.exe
I’m using is 15.0.4623.1001, so later than the version specified at the end of that article which is 15.0.4619.1000. Where can I expect to see the elements excluded? Will it be when loading the package into the management console or would it just not appear
on the machine when delivered?
<Configuration>
<Add SourcePath="C:\OfficeDeploymentToolV2" Version="15.0.4659.1001" OfficeClientEdition="32">
    <Product ID="ProPlusVolume">
      <Language ID="en-us" />
<ExcludeApp ID="Access" />
<ExcludeApp ID="InfoPath" />
    </Product>
</Add>
</Configuration>
3). We’ve not used global publishing in our environment yet so I will try that. I’ve set both GlobalRefreshEnabled and GlobalRefreshOnLogon to True and when using the command Get-AppvPublishingServer on the client I’m testing with I can see this is pulled
through correctly. I’ve also added the client name to the AD group used to grant access to the package and it is published. However nothing is pulling through onto the Client, so are there any steps I’ve missed or misinterpreted when looking to set this up?
I guess the global publishing is there to keep in with licensing for Office being per device? On a slight aside, as Windows licensing is being changed to allow per user licensing
http://www.zdnet.com/microsoft-to-make-per-user-windows-licensing-available-to-enterprise-customers-7000035401/ does anyone know if there are any plans to allow for Office / Project / Visio licenses to go per user as well? We’re a volume license customer
rather than subscription based so I think a lot of the options to selectively deploy Visio and Project are excluded for us.
Dan,
Ok that explains why the security could be tripping out then and leading to this result. As above I’ll try with global publishing and see how I get on.
From what I’ve read / watched I think only one Office 2013 package can be published to a machine, so we would be unable to have a separate package for Visio and a separate package for Project and then attempt to deliver
them both together. If a user wanted both Project and Visio then I guess we’d need to have a combined Project and Visio package to cover than scenario, but then 2 more separate Project and Visio packages for those who would only want either Project and Visio
(I think).
The scenario we’re looking at is to see whether we are able to deliver Project and / or Visio to different users through an AppV package and this will then cover users on XenApp or on fat clients. Only a small proportion of our
users will need access to Project and / or Visio so therefore we’d only have a small amount of Project and Visio licenses.
However from what I’ve tested up to this point and from what I’ve picked up from Forum posts / watched on TechEd sessions is that as publishing is Global and is unable to use different security groups for different elements of the
suite, then using Office through AppV is only suitable if you will be delivering the whole suite (including Project and Visio) to all of your users. So in a scenario where you’d only want certain elements to be delivered to a handful of users then you’d need
to keep with traditional ESD methods to have this installed onto fat clients and steer clear of XenApp. If wanting to install to XenApp then a lockdown tool like AppSense or AppLocker would also need to be brought into the equation.
Is my understanding above correct or have I missed some options / methods?
If the full Office package is always delivered but a company only has Office licenses and no Project and Visio licenses for all its users, how do they stop Project and Visio being delivered and being available? Or again if you have
this use case is the AppV method one which will be unsuitable?
Thanks

How to log to a file using the log-configuration.xml?

Hello *,
I created following log-configuration.xml
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE log-configuration SYSTEM "log-configuration.dtd">
<log-configuration>
     <log-formatters>
          <log-formatter name="DefaultFormatter" pattern="%25d %-60l %s: %m" type="TraceFormatter"/>
     </log-formatters>
     <log-destinations>
          <log-destination count="10" effective-severity="ALL" limit="1000000" name="DefaultDestination" pattern="FDLB_GUI.%g.trc" type="FileLog">
               <formatter-ref name="DefaultFormatter"/>
          </log-destination>
     </log-destinations>
     <log-controllers>
          <log-controller effective-severity="ALL" maximum-severity="FATAL" minimum-severity="DEBUG" name="DefaultController">
               <associated-destinations>
                    <destination-ref association-type="LOG" name="DefaultDestination"/>
               </associated-destinations>
          </log-controller>
     </log-controllers>
</log-configuration>
From a Web Dynpro view I want to use the log-controller. I'm using the default logger:
Logging location.
private static final com.sap.tc.logging.Location logger =
    com.sap.tc.logging.Location.getLocation(EinstiegView.class);
In the wdInit method I want to log a simple message:
public void wdDoInit()
    //@@begin wdDoInit()
    logger.setEffectiveSeverity(com.sap.tc.logging.Severity.ALL);
    logger.fatalT("test logging to new file logger");
    //@@end wdDoInit()
I see the message in the defaultTrace.0.log, but my own log file doesn't appear.
How to address the log-controller of my log-configuration.xml?
Thanks in advance,
Jürgen Dufner

Hi,
I guess the follwing part of your log-configuration is wrong:
<log-controller
effective-severity="ALL"
maximum-severity="FATAL" m
nimum-severity="DEBUG"
name="DefaultController">
Try to change in log-configuration the value for name in <log-controller> to the start sequence of the packages to be logged. E.g., all our packages should start with com.yourcompanyname.projectname
To log all messages from classes in these packages make the name = com.yourcompanyname.projectname.
Hope that helps,
Regards, Astrid
Therefore I list

PO Version Number not available in PO List displays (ME2L, ME2K, etc)

I have configured PO Version Management. My PO's are working as desired with proper output.
However, the PO Version Number is not displayed in my PO List Display tcodes (ME2L, ME2K, etc) nor is it available to add to the layout. I have configured the Scope of List for "BEST" (PO's) to include change documents. However, there is nothing when I go to ME2L for a PO that has 15 versions. I have verified that EKKO does contain the latest version number for this PO.
Have I missed a config step??

Thank you - I did post in MM once I realized I posted in SRM.
I realize that only the current version is displayed in these transactions. But I need to see the actual version number - no the history - just the current version number. We use these reports to supply our Internal Auditors with PO Data and they require to see the PO # and Version # without having to actually pull up each PO individually in the system.
I had assumed that since they use EKKO and EKKO contains REVNO that REVNO would be available in my layout and I could simply add it to the report. However, this is not the case.
Thanks,
Tonia

SCCM 2012 R2 CU3 installation successfull but the Full Version number still is 5.00.7958.1000

Hi Guys
I have a SCCM 2012R2 in Windows 2008R2 box with a Secondary Site also in Windows 2008R2. Before proceeding with the upgrade to CU3 I took a snapshot, installed Windows Management Framework 4.0 to get PowerShell 4.0 in order to run a health Check, all
fine until this point.
I installed CU3 and checked that the value in CULevel in HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\SMS\Setup is 3 and also check the
version that is displayed in the About System Center Configuration Manager dialog box is
5.00.7958.1401
I checked the log file C:\Windows\Temp\cm12-r2cu3-kb2994331-x64-enu.log and all good in there as well. So it's fair to say the installation was successful..??
the next step was to upgrade my secondary site from the Primary site console, so I went to Administration / Site Configuration / Sites and when I right clicked my Primary Server to check its properties I realised that the Version number was still
5.00.7958.1000 and the option to upgrade my secondary site is greyed out.
I haven't been able to find any information regarding this issue, in fact I am not sure if is a technical issue or human issue :)
the questions are, how do I upgrade my secondary site and why the difference in between version?
Regards
Jesus Gonzalez

Works as dessigned. The site version number will only show the version of the latest major build, which is R2 in your case. The same with upgrading your secondary site, that's only possible via the console, with a major build. For upgrading your secondary
site you can now use the created package R2 CU3 - server update.
My Blog: http://www.petervanderwoude.nl/
Follow me on twitter: pvanderwoude

CCMS Alert Monitor (edit monitor-configuration.xml. ?)

Hi Friends
I'm trying to change the default polling time for the CCMS Alert Monitor, 5 minutes instead of 30 minutes.
In http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nwpi71/helpdata/en/e5/5d1741b393f26fe10000000a1550b0/content.htm you can read:
Accuracy
The default polling period for the monitor is 30 minutes. If you want to have shorter polling periods, you can change them in the SAP NetWeaver Administrator as follows:
1. Choose Availability and Performance Management ® Resource Monitoring ® Java System Reports (alias: /nwa/java-sys-reports).
2. Select an arbitrary Number of errors entry in the monitoring tree of the Adapter Engine (leaf node).
3. Choose Configuration in the right-hand pane.
4. Choose Edit in the dialog box that appears.
5. Change the polling period to 5 minutes, for instance.
6. Choose Save and wait until saving is finished (be patient, since this may take a while).
7. Choose Configuration Management ® Infrastructure Management ® Java Configuration Browser.
8. Choose apps ® sap.com ® com.sap.aii.af.app ® Monitoring Configurator ® monitor-configuration.xml.
9. In the xml file, change the polled-by-template period to the same value as above, for example, 5 minutes.
10. Save the modified xml file.
11. Choose Operations Management ® Infrastructure Management ® Start & Stop ® Java EE Services to restart the Monitoring service to apply the changes.
But in step 9, the xml file I've found in my PI 7.1 (SP6) is this:
<monitor-configuration>
<monitor-semantics />
<monitor-tree />
</monitor-configuration>
Also, there is no way to modify that file, you can only display it or download it.
can anyone tell me how to edit the file.
regards
raja

Hi Raja,
This is the same as doing the following:
You can locate the monitor-configuration.xml file in the SDA com.sap.aii.af.app.sda (inside META-INF folder). You can find this SDA in the install directory of PI installation. In this XML file please locate and edit the following tag:
<template-info template-name="SAP_XIJ2EE_RCRDS">
                        <polled-by-template period="30" unit="MINUTE">
                            <generating-resource
                                name="com.sap.aii.utilxi.rtcheck.mx.standard.XIJ2EEComponentMBean" type="APPLICATION"/>
                            <template-attribute-mapping>
                                <invoked-resource-method name="getMonitoringRecords"/>
                            </template-attribute-mapping>
                        </polled-by-template>
                    </template-info>
Change the above to the following *************
<template-info template-name="SAP_XIJ2EE_RCRDS">
                        <polled-by-template period="5" unit="MINUTE">
                            <generating-resource
                                name="com.sap.aii.utilxi.rtcheck.mx.standard.XIJ2EEComponentMBean" type="APPLICATION"/>
                            <template-attribute-mapping>
                                <invoked-resource-method name="getMonitoringRecords"/>
                            </template-attribute-mapping>
                        </polled-by-template>
                    </template-info>
The main change is the polled-by-template value from 30 mins to 5 mins as per your req ******
Construct back the SDA (you can search SDN for that) with this edited XML and then redeploy this SDA with the help of JSPM tool.
This will re-start the PI Server for the changes to come into effect.
I hope this helps.
PS: You can consult your BASIS consultant to locate this sda and re-deploy it on PI Server.
Regards, Gaurav.

Java error message - Bad version number in .class file

I get the error noted below in Safari, Firefox, and Chrome when I try to view java containing web pages.
Specifically this page: http://aviationweather.gov/adds/tafs/java/
My Java Preferences are as follows
My OS is 10.5.8
Thanks!
Java Plug-in 1.6.0_26
Using JRE version 1.5.0_30-b03-389-9M3425 Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM
User home directory = /Users/ernest
c:   clear console window
f:   finalize objects on finalization queue
g:   garbage collect
h:   display this help message
l:   dump classloader list
m:   print memory usage
o:   trigger logging
q:   hide console
r:   reload policy configuration
s:   dump system and deployment properties
t:   dump thread list
v:   dump thread stack
x:   clear classloader cache
0-5: set trace level to <n>
java.lang.UnsupportedClassVersionError: Bad version number in .class file
    at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass1(Native Method)
    at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass(ClassLoader.java:676)
    at java.security.SecureClassLoader.defineClass(SecureClassLoader.java:124)
    at java.net.URLClassLoader.defineClass(URLClassLoader.java:260)
    at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
    at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
    at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.ja va:25)
    at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:592)
    at sun.plugin2.applet.Plugin2ClassLoader.defineClassHelper(Plugin2ClassLoader.java :1014)
    at sun.plugin2.applet.Plugin2ClassLoader.access$100(Plugin2ClassLoader.java:69)
    at sun.plugin2.applet.Plugin2ClassLoader$2.run(Plugin2ClassLoader.java:991)
    at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
    at sun.plugin2.applet.Plugin2ClassLoader.findClassHelper(Plugin2ClassLoader.java:9 55)
    at sun.plugin2.applet.Applet2ClassLoader.findClass(Applet2ClassLoader.java:134)
    at sun.plugin2.applet.Plugin2ClassLoader.loadClass0(Plugin2ClassLoader.java:250)
    at sun.plugin2.applet.Plugin2ClassLoader.loadClass(Plugin2ClassLoader.java:180)
    at sun.plugin2.applet.Plugin2ClassLoader.loadClass(Plugin2ClassLoader.java:161)
    at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:252)
    at sun.plugin2.applet.Plugin2ClassLoader.loadCode(Plugin2ClassLoader.java:675)
    at sun.plugin2.applet.Plugin2Manager.createApplet(Plugin2Manager.java:3046)
    at sun.plugin2.applet.Plugin2Manager$AppletExecutionRunnable.run(Plugin2Manager.ja va:1498)
    at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:655)
Exception: java.lang.UnsupportedClassVersionError: Bad version number in .class file

Hi, thank you for the reply. However, java is definitely enabled on my computer, on all my browsers. In fact, if I go to the SUN website and run the java test, I get that all is OK.
I think it may have something to do with the .class (maybe in .jar-file) compiled with a higher version of java than the virtual machine trying to run it.
The example I found (google search) is .class-file that is compiled with JDK 6 and I am trying to run it with 1.4 JVM.
There is some software error going on somewhere... but I do not know enough to fix it.
Many thanks for all your help

How to pass version number of process using API's

Locator locator = new Locator("default","bpel");
IDeliveryService deliveryService = (IDeliveryService) locator.lookupService(IDeliveryService.SERVICE_NAME );
// Construct a normalized message and send to Oracle BPEL Process Manager
NormalizedMessage nm = new NormalizedMessage();
nm.addPart("payload", xml);
// Initiate the BPEL process
deliveryService.post("AsyncProc1", "initiate", nm);
When I run this code, I get the following error:
09/03/31 15:07:46.953 workflowform: Servlet error
ORABPEL-02178
Process not found.
The BPEL process "AsyncProc1", revision "" has not been loaded. Either the process was not initialized properly or the process has
been disabled.
Please consult your administrator regarding this error. The application server logs may provide more information regarding this error
I had created many versions of the same process. I need to use version 4.0 of this workflow. Is it possible to pass the version number while initiating the process?
Thanks.

Hi Badri,
I think you can identify the bpel with different versions as follows:
bpelprocessName_1.1 or bpelprocessName_v1.1
either one of these should be correct.
Thanks
Saikrishna

Which file in Omni.ja contains the version number in HELP | ABOUT

We are using Firefox in a corporate locked down environment.
we have made a number of changes to files in the OMNI.JA file to configure Firefox accordingly.
We now have a newer version of firefox to install/package however, when we replace the default omni.ja file in FF 10.0.10 and go into HELP | ABOUT it shows the version number of FF that the omni.ja file came from, ie 10.0.4.
Which file(s) need to be replaced in omni.ja so that when we select HELP | ABOUT it shows the correct version of 10.0.10 ?
regards
Bill

hello biffal, which changes to the omnia.ja file have you done originally? maybe there's a better way to do it, because this file will be overwritten by each & every firefox update...

Version number in 'About the Application' with Oracle SCM

We are using Designer 6i with Headstart 6.5. We will be turning on Source Configuration Manager in Designer shortly , but after we go live. Hence we want to set up the P_revision value for displaying version in 'About this Application' form before using SCM, and want to do it so there will be minimal change when SCM Does get turned on.
The Question:
Can someone tell how the SCM version number get loaded into Headstart's p_revision on th forms ???

The P_REVISION is just a forms parameters with as default value the version number.
There is no direct link between the version number determined by SCM and this parameter.
However there is Headstart utility which create or update the P_REVISION parameter to a manual supplied value or to the version number as determined by SCM.

Version Number - Both numeric and alphanumeric

Hello
I need to have for a particular document both numeric and alphanumeric versions. I tried it will user exit * but while doing this the sequence of version is getting lost. The version is not proposed while creating new version
Kindly help in this regards
Gajesh

Gajesh
What is your exact requirement? Can you please give more details, it'll help forum to understand & the get back to your with solution.
If you are looking to have your version number like, A0, A1, A2 etc..
Then you need to do following configuration. Go to,
IMG>Cross-Application Components>Document Management>Control Data>Define Document Types , see the details (CTRLSHIFTF2) of your document type. In the next screen, in the Attributes tab, iin Vers. No. Incr. (Version Number Increment Control) field, enter 3 , then you'll have version numbers starting from A0......Z9 . Similarly, if you enter 6 you'll have version numbers startin from AA...AZ,A0...A9,BA..BZ,B0..Z9
I hope it helps you.
Best Regards
Amaresh Makal

The interface type is valid, but the specified interface number is not configured

Hi
I'm all new to using LabVIEW, which I have to use for a project. I'm trying to make a setup with a Keithley 2000 multimeter and an Agilent U2722A SMU. But I can't figure out how to get these instruments to communicate with LabVIEW. I can see and send commands to the Keithley 2000, but not the Agilent U2722A, with Agilent Connection Expert. But when I use LabVIEW I can't see any of them, and if I use the drivers I've found with "NI Instrument Driver Finder - Configure Search" I pops up with an error message saying
"Error -1073807195 occurred at VISA Open in Keithley 2000.lvlib:Initialize.vi->Keithley 2000 Read Multiple.vi?
Possible reason(s):
VISA: (Hex 0xBFFF00A5) The interface type is valid, but the specified interface number is not configured.?"
I've read all the threads I could find about this problem, but none of them helped. I've checked that the NiVi488.dll is checked in MAX under the VISA options. When I open the VISA Interactive Control I see an ASRL1>>ASRL1::INSTR and ASRL10>>ASRL10::INSTR. I don't know why it says ASRL, when I'm using an USB/GPIB interface, but the Keithley 2000 have 10 as the address. (the Agilent U2722A is connected directly by USB)
Assume I know nothing.
Thanks

I'm using the GPIB-USB-HS. I also used this on the development PC when I exported the hardware configuration.
This shows up in my MAX config and when I scan instruments, all of them show up. I can query them in MAX no problem.
My installer includes all the .exe's from my project. As I said, I've done this with my previous 2009 installer without any issue. I upgraded my installer since I upgraded my project for version 2013. The error only happens when I run my code.

The version 0000000075 of development configuration is now available

Hi experts,
when im loging into nwdi im getting pop up with below message , can u please explain what is the verison 0000000075 and why is it asking for that..
The version 0000000075 of development configuration is now available
Do you want to update the development Configuration ?
Regards
Govardan Raj

Hi Govardan,
a track has a server side development config (created as per the domain data settings and track data settings i.e. includes cbs, dtr, cms url, sld nameserver and the software component dependencies).
It is an XML file you can check in CMS webui -- Track Data -- Build variants -- display development config.
If you create a devconfig in your NWDS, then this XML file is getting synced to your local space (this is the file called .confdef).
After this no more sync is getting done, but the locally stored .confdef is used by the devconfig, so it knows, which cms, dtr, cbs , sld to contact, etc. in other words: how to use the track.
If you change on the server side devconfig (by changing on say cbs, dtr or sld url or SC dependency setup) then NWDS recognizes that its locally stored .confdef became outdated.
This is why you have that popup that the server side devconf version XY is now available and you can make the locally stored one up to date.
I hope this answers your question.
Best Regards,
Ervin

Version number of nbproject/configurations.xml

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for