Very slow DFSR on Windows Server 2008

We need to have distributed file system between two location.
I evaluating possibility to use DFS and two Windows Server 2008 to do it.
I set up two computer with clean installation of system.
The test is on two local subnets, so speed should not be an issue.
Each server is defined in separate logical site.
The DFSR folder I create on one server has 50 GB / 40,000 files.
The initial replication still is not finished after couple of days.
The transfer speed is only about 5kB/s and 3 files / min.
I increase staging quote to 100GB, so it should not be a limit.
I also make simple test of speed between both servers.
I create shared folder on both servers and manually copy files.
The transfer speed is reasonable 5 MB/s (1000 time faster that DFSR).
There is no processor load on servers (0% CPU).
This is test before real use so server do almost nothing else.
The event log shows sometimes 5014 but followed immediately with 5004.
Does anybody have an idea what is wrong?

Thank you for your help.
The replication process just stopped.
This morning target folder size is exactly same as yesterday.
Previously it at least slowly increase.
I looked at those log files, but I still need to understand them.
The log level is default (means 4) and there is many entries there.
Anyway I attached examples, while searching what it their meaning.
The source server:
Many warning looking like this:
20090529 08:30:34.122 2772 SRTR 2344 [WARN] InitializeFileTransferAsyncState::ProcessIoCompletion Failed connId:{} rdc:0 uid:{}-v74162 gsvn:{}-v74162 Error: [Error:170(0xaa) InitializeFileTransferAsyncState::ProcessIoCompletion servertransport.cpp:2235 2772 W The requested resource is in use.] completion:0 ptr:09B27F40
From time to time errors sequence:
20090529 08:33:33.086 2608 DOWN 3991 [ERROR] DownstreamTransport::EstablishSession Failed on connId:{} csId:{} rgName:Common Volume Error:
+    [Error:9027(0x2343) DownstreamTransport::EstablishSession downstreamtransport.cpp:3984 2608 C A failure was reported by the remote partner]
+    [Error:9051(0x235b) DownstreamTransport::EstablishSession downstreamtransport.cpp:3984 2608 C The content set is not ready]
20090529 08:33:33.086 2608 INCO 3566 InConnection::RestartSession Retrying establish contentset session. connId:{} csId:{} csName:common
20090529 08:33:33.086 2608 INCO   774 [WARN] SessionTask::Step (Ignored) Failed, should have already been processed. Error:
+    [Error:9027(0x2343) InConnection::EstablishSession inconnection.cpp:3657 2608 C A failure was reported by the remote partner]
+    [Error:9027(0x2343) DownstreamTransport::EstablishSession downstreamtransport.cpp:4005 2608 C A failure was reported by the remote partner]
+    [Error:9027(0x2343) DownstreamTransport::EstablishSession downstreamtransport.cpp:3984 2608 C A failure was reported by the remote partner]
+    [Error:9051(0x235b) DownstreamTransport::EstablishSession downstreamtransport.cpp:3984 2608 C The content set is not ready]
The target server:
20090529 08:31:33.054 3196 SRTR   784 [WARN] SERVER_EstablishSession Failed on connId:{} csId:{} Error:
+    [Error:9051(0x235b) UpstreamTransport::EstablishSession upstreamtransport.cpp:707 3196 C The content set is not ready]
+    [Error:9051(0x235b) OutConnection::EstablishSession outconnection.cpp:2623 3196 C The content set is not ready]
20090529 08:31:33.974 1664 DOWN 2723 AsyncRpcHandler::ProcessReceive Completion. connId:{} csId:{} reqType:AsyncPollRequest reqState:Completed status:9026 ptr:056820B0
20090529 08:31:33.974 1664 DOWN 2748 [ERROR] AsyncRpcHandler::ProcessReceive Failed on connId:{} csId:{} reqType:AsyncPollRequest reqState:Completed status:9026 Error:
+    [Error:9027(0x2343) AsyncRpcHandler::ReceiveAsyncPoll downstreamtransport.cpp:2131 1664 C A failure was reported by the remote partner]
+    [Error:9027(0x2343) AsyncRpcHandler::ReceiveAsyncPoll downstreamtransport.cpp:2073 1664 C A failure was reported by the remote partner]
+    [Error:9026(0x2342) AsyncRpcHandler::ReceiveAsyncPoll downstreamtransport.cpp:2073 1664 C The connection is invalid]
20090529 08:31:33.974 1664 INCO 2543 InConnection::ReConnect Ignoring reconnect. state:4 connId:{}
20090529 08:31:33.974 1664 RPCN   663 [ERROR] IoPortManager::ThreadEntryProc (Ignored) Failed IoCompletionProcessVvUp. Error:
+    [Error:9027(0x2343) AsyncRpcHandler::ProcessReceive downstreamtransport.cpp:2809 1664 C A failure was reported by the remote partner]
+    [Error:9027(0x2343) AsyncRpcHandler::ReceiveAsyncPoll downstreamtransport.cpp:2131 1664 C A failure was reported by the remote partner]
+    [Error:9027(0x2343) AsyncRpcHandler::ReceiveAsyncPoll downstreamtransport.cpp:2073 1664 C A failure was reported by the remote partner]
+    [Error:9026(0x2342) AsyncRpcHandler::ReceiveAsyncPoll downstreamtransport.cpp:2073 1664 C The connection is invalid]
20090529 08:30:34.118 2588 INCO 2705 InConnection::ProcessErrorStatus (Ignored) Remote error connId:{} Error:
+    [Error:9027(0x2343) DownstreamTransport::RawGet downstreamtransport.cpp:4768 2588 C A failure was reported by the remote partner]
+    [Error:9027(0x2343) RpcFinalizeContext downstreamtransport.cpp:1096 2588 C A failure was reported by the remote partner]
+    [Error:9027(0x2343) DownstreamTransport::RawGet downstreamtransport.cpp:4711 2588 C A failure was reported by the remote partner]
+    [Error:170(0xaa) DownstreamTransport::RawGet downstreamtransport.cpp:4711 2588 W The requested resource is in use.]
20090529 08:30:34.118 2588 MEET 2032 Meet::Download Download Succeeded : false updateName:Tutorial_V2_Gerotor_Surfaces_html_6de9f06.png uid:{}-v74168 gvsn:{}-v74168 connId:{} csName:common csId:{}
20090529 08:30:34.118 1920 INCO 5599 InConnection::LogTransferActivity Failed to receive RAWGET uid:{}-v74169 gvsn:{}-v74169 fileName:Tutorial_V2_Gerotor_Surfaces_html_7153b1c3.png connId:{} csId:{} stagedSize:0 Error:
+    [Error:9027(0x2343) DownstreamTransport::RawGet downstreamtransport.cpp:4768 1920 C A failure was reported by the remote partner]
+    [Error:9027(0x2343) RpcFinalizeContext downstreamtransport.cpp:1096 1920 C A failure was reported by the remote partner]
+    [Error:9027(0x2343) DownstreamTransport::RawGet downstreamtransport.cpp:4711 1920 C A failure was reported by the remote partner]
+    [Error:170(0xaa) DownstreamTransport::RawGet downstreamtransport.cpp:4711 1920 W The requested resource is in use.]
20090529 08:30:34.118 1920 INCO 2705 InConnection::ProcessErrorStatus (Ignored) Remote error connId:{} Error:
+    [Error:9027(0x2343) DownstreamTransport::RawGet downstreamtransport.cpp:4768 1920 C A failure was reported by the remote partner]
+    [Error:9027(0x2343) RpcFinalizeContext downstreamtransport.cpp:1096 1920 C A failure was reported by the remote partner]
+    [Error:9027(0x2343) DownstreamTransport::RawGet downstreamtransport.cpp:4711 1920 C A failure was reported by the remote partner]
+    [Error:170(0xaa) DownstreamTransport::RawGet downstreamtransport.cpp:4711 1920 W The requested resource is in use.]
20090529 08:30:34.118 2588 INCO 2705 InConnection::ProcessErrorStatus (Ignored) Remote error connId:{} Error:
+    [Error:9027(0x2343) Meet::InstallStep meet.cpp:1657 2588 C A failure was reported by the remote partner]
+    [Error:9027(0x2343) Meet::Download meet.cpp:2052 2588 C A failure was reported by the remote partner]
+    [Error:9027(0x2343) InConnection::RawGet inconnection.cpp:5688 2588 C A failure was reported by the remote partner]
+    [Error:9027(0x2343) DownstreamTransport::RawGet downstreamtransport.cpp:4768 2588 C A failure was reported by the remote partner]
+    [Error:9027(0x2343) RpcFinalizeContext downstreamtransport.cpp:1096 2588 C A failure was reported by the remote partner]
+    [Error:9027(0x2343) DownstreamTransport::RawGet downstreamtransport.cpp:4711 2588 C A failure was reported by the remote partner]
+    [Error:170(0xaa) DownstreamTransport::RawGet downstreamtransport.cpp:4711 2588 W The requested resource is in use.]
20090529 08:30:34.118 1920 MEET 2032 Meet::Download Download Succeeded : false updateName:Tutorial_V2_Gerotor_Surfaces_html_7153b1c3.png uid:{}-v74169 gvsn:{}-v74169 connId:{} csName:common csId:{}
20090529 08:30:34.118 2588 MEET 1263 Meet::Install -> WAIT Error processing update. updateName:Tutorial_V2_Gerotor_Surfaces_html_6de9f06.png uid:{}-v74168 gvsn:{}-v74168 connId:{} csName:common csId:{} code:170 Error:
+    [Error:9027(0x2343) Meet::InstallStep meet.cpp:1657 2588 C A failure was reported by the remote partner]
+    [Error:9027(0x2343) Meet::Download meet.cpp:2052 2588 C A failure was reported by the remote partner]
+    [Error:9027(0x2343) InConnection::RawGet inconnection.cpp:5688 2588 C A failure was reported by the remote partner]
+    [Error:9027(0x2343) DownstreamTransport::RawGet downstreamtransport.cpp:4768 2588 C A failure was reported by the remote partner]
+    [Error:9027(0x2343) RpcFinalizeContext downstreamtransport.cpp:1096 2588 C A failure was reported by the remote partner]
+    [Error:9027(0x2343) DownstreamTransport::RawGet downstreamtransport.cpp:4711 2588 C A failure was reported by the remote partner]
+    [Error:170(0xaa) DownstreamTransport::RawGet downstreamtransport.cpp:4711 2588 W The requested resource is in use.]

Similar Messages

Failover of ASCS takes very long on a Windows Server 2008 Cluster

Hello everybody,
I have configured a ABAP SCS (NetWeaver 7.0) running on a Windows Server 2008 Cluster. The database runs on SQL Server 2008 which is also configured for use in the MSCS. The ASCS and the database run fine in the Cluster. So far so good.
When I want to move the SAP Group which contains the ASCS from on node the other node, then the failover will take very long (approximately 2-3 minutes). The Service of the group will go offline in a few seconds, but the Instance needs about 1 minute to go offline and on the other node it needs more then one minute to become online.
The failover of the databaseinstance will take only about 10 seconds.
Have you got any ideas why the failover of the SAP Group will take so long?
Thanks for your help in advance!
Kind Regards,
Wolfgang

One minute would be somewhat long if you are running a faster server and just the ABAP environment. But I've seen ABAP/JAVA systems take up to 10 minutes to restart on a win 2005 clustered system.
Have you looked through the developer traces?
J. Haynes

After intalling windows server 2008 R2 on database server, dstabase connections are very slow

Hi,
I upgraded my server from windows server 2003 to windows server 2008 R2. I have two application servers. Now applications on application servers are trying to execute queries but those are taking too long. It is very strange why it is happening.
Firewall rule is open for 1433 TCP and 1434 UDP.
Application servers are Windows Server 2003
Thanks in advance!
Thanks,
Sanjeev

Another possible cause is a problem with the application server. You might try a reboot of the problem app server to see of that changes performance.
If performance doesn't change after the reboot, try a coping a 100MB file from the database server to the application servers for performance comparison. Assuming the performance difference for the copy is roughly the same as the queries, that
will eliminate SQL Server for troubleshooting and allow you to focus on networking as the likely culprit. The fact that 10Mbps outperforms 100Mbps is concerning. Perhaps the OS upgrade resulted in different drivers or interface configuration, or maybe
there is something else going on external to the servers, such as incorrect routing.
I'm not a network guy but I would start by reviewing network interfaces on all servers to ensure they are configured properly and for full capabilities of the hardware and correct subnet and gateway. Also review all components if your network
topology for proper configuration.
For additional help with Windows networking, I suggest you start a new thread in the Windows Server Platform Networking TechNet forum (http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/windowsserver/en-US/home?forum=winserverPN).
Include the results of the file copy test and a link back to this thread.
Dan Guzman, SQL Server MVP, http://www.dbdelta.com

Slow remote request on 7.6.03.15 on Windows server 2008

Hello all,
I have install MAXDB on Windows server 2008.
When I made request from a remote computer on the database with SQLStudio requests are very slow.
For example I request an empty table :
SELECT * FROM <TABLENAME> the request seem fast.
but this one is very slow, I only replace * with all columns
SELECT ArcState, Comp_date_time, ContFlag, Deferred, SndAccount, SndAddress, SndCompany, SndName, SndType, RcpAddress, Msn, Notif, OwnerID, OwnerPB, PreviewMessage, PreviewVisible, Priority, Purged, DIST_ABORTED, DIST_ABORTEDCOUNT, DIST_OWNER, DIST_NUM, DIST_VERSION, Status_str, State, Subject, Sub_date_time, SATID, RcpCompany, RcpName, Viewed FROM <TABLENAME>
This request takes 0.3s, and the table is empty. Everything work find if sqlstudio is running on local computer even if I use XSERVER
How could you explain this behavior ?
To avoid DNS issues I put IP adress in ETC/host, I also disable Windows2008 firewall.
If you have any idea that could help me, let me know.
Thanks for help.
Yann.

Hi Markus,
Here is the result of explain.
ESKDBADM     DBM350_AC     AC_SUB_DATE_TIMED     INDEX SCAN              1
             RESULT IS NOT COPIED , COSTVALUE IS              2
          QUERYREWRITE - APPLIED RULES:
             DistinctPullUp              1
Keep in mind that the table is empty,
If I excute this request on remote computer.
SELECT ArcState, Comp_date_time, ContFlag, Deferred, SndAccount, SndAddress, SndCompany, SndName, SndType, RcpAddress, Msn, Notif, OwnerID, OwnerPB, PreviewMessage, PreviewVisible, Priority, Purged, DIST_ABORTED, DIST_ABORTEDCOUNT, DIST_OWNER, DIST_NUM, DIST_VERSION, Status_str, State, Subject, Sub_date_time, SATID, RcpCompany, RcpName, Viewed FROM DBM350_AC WHERE (((ArcState IS NULL OR ArcState != 4) AND (PreviewMessage IS NULL OR PreviewMessage = 0 OR PreviewVisible = 1))) ORDER BY Sub_date_time DESC WITH LOCK ISOLATION LEVEL 0
on an empty table, it always take 0,608s, I can type several time on F8, It always take 0,608s.
You said
"To really compare those two statements - stop and start the database between them - and you will see that both of them take the same amount of time."
I agree with you if the second call is faster than the first call, because of datacache , but in my case it's always slow.
How to explain that a select on an empty table can take 0.608s ?
I think there is something wrong in Windows2008, but I don't kwon what.
Yann.

Windows Server 2008 R2 Slow LAN Transfer (Receive)

Using Windows 7 Ultimate and Windows Server 2008 R2
Two machines, connected via 1GB 1000base-T LAN, with a 1Gb switch between... and yes, I've tried swapping cables and ports. Server has two RAID5's, a 6 platter and an 8 platter. Workstation has two RAID5's, a 3 SSD and a 4 platter. Both sides using Intel
CPU's and a RealTek 8100C chipset Gb LAN, same LAN drivers.
Using Windows Explorer to COPY a 20GB file:
Server Disk1 to Server Disk 2: >250MB/s (Server disk I/O isn't an issue).
Server Disk2 to Server Disk 1: >250MB/s (Server disk I/O isn't an issue).
Workstation Disk1 to Disk2: >150MB/s (Workstation disk I/O isn't an issue).
Workstation Disk2 to Disk1: >150MB/s (Workstation disk I/O isn't an issue).
Server Disk1 to Workstation Disk2: 91MB/s (near 100% LAN utilization).
All looks good so far:
Workstation Disk2 to Server Disk2: 25MB/s declining to 17MB/s; occasionally as low as 9MB/s.
Some of the changes listed above appeared to work for a few moments. I've seen as high as 90MB/s for a few seconds, but it declines rapidly under 30MB/s... so no fix that has lasted.
It appears there is something in Windows 7 that prevents fast transmits; or something in Windows Server 2008 that blocks fast receives. I have set the server-side receive training to disabled, normal, highlyrestricted, and experimental and the Win7 side
to off, normal, and highlyrestricted in various combinations. Again, nothing concrete to report as an improvement.
What would the MS Gurus suggest I do with NetMonitor as far as capturing something worth their time to diagnose?

I've tried disabling auto tuning on the clients with no appreciable effect. The throttling feature however appears to have had an effect - changing the setting from default 10 to 70 has slowed the transfer from 20MB/s down to about an initial 6MB/s that
has slowed even further, and is now at 3.2MB/s (3% network utilization according to Resource Monitor at both ends of the wire - WS2008R2 and W7).
Question: What does the 10 (0x0a and 70 (0x46) represent: Mbps on the LAN, or 10% and 70% reserved, or?
I'll try the "off" setting of all FF's and add to this.
In any case, having a backup server that can't be utilized due to client "entertainment media" issues is a little painful... there should be a straightforward and published method to set the network to "normal".
UPDATE:
I've tried settings of 0, 10, 70, and FFFFFFFF. 10 might have been best, but only marginally better than 70. Range of time to copy was under 7 minutes to over 8 minutes. Very small difference.
But I also tried this using Windows Explorer and a Dataset of one folder containing 12.5GB of miscellaneous folders and files - and was surprised.
- Dataset is at \\WIN7\Dx\ = = Client physical RAID5 drive D:\Dataset
On WIN7 Client: Share drive D with Everyone as Dx
On WSvr Server: Share drive D with Everyone as Dx
On WIN7 Client: Map \\WSvr\Dx to Z:
On WSvr Server: Map \\WIN7\Dx to Z:
On WIN7 Client, using Windows Explorer:
-- Copy Dataset from Local Drive D: to Network Drive Z:
-- Took about 8 minutes, with 20% network utilization.
On WSvr (2008 R2 Server), using Windows Explorer:
-- Copy Dataset from Network Drive Z: to Local Drive D:
-- Took about 3 minutes, and 70% network utilization.
Why does running the copy from the server allow better network utilization and net throughput?
UPDATE2:
I am NOT using HOMEGROUP; I have a dedicated workgroup network the client is a member of, and the server is a DC. I'll eventually try joining the client to the domain and see if that changes anything, but doubt it will so haven't taken the time yet.

IMacs running slow off Windows Server 2008

Currently the Creative Director and I are the only ones at our company working on Macs. We both are running OSX 10.6.8 on iMacs and we are having major slow loading time in Finder and very, very slow loading time working with Adobe files (PSDs/AIs/INDDs).
The company I work for has been bought out by another company and they had their tech guys come in to install a server.. I have recently found out that it is a Windows Server 2008. We were told to transfer our files to this server and ever since have been having problems. I have tried to communicate with some of the techs and they either complain about Macs or are not that familiar with Macs. They don't have any other designers at their company, so I am not sure how to get them to understand the issue.
I have done some research and found others with similar problems, but I am not really finding a solution or a discussion that is very recent. I think this is a problem that has been around for awhile, but we are new to it. The problem seems to be with the SMB sharing.
We would be grateful if anyone had any insight or infomation regarding working off a Windows Server 2008 from a Mac or whether we should recommend us working off a Mac Server which is backed up to the main server.
Thanks!
Aa

Appreciate it Ed.
I let our boss know about Extreme ZIP and forwarded the link to our IT team. Although we haven't gotten a response back yet, I am thinking that a mac server would be a cheaper purchase overall since it wouldn't be a reoccuring monthly charge.
If we were to convert one an extra Mac Pros to a Lion Server, is it possible to have that backed up or connected to the Windows Server 2008? Or would we need to do that the Mac Pro. Not sure how to word this, my lack of experience in servers shines through here.
Really trying to save us from switching to PCs, thinking if we can convert the Mac Pro to a Lion Server it would be our least expenseive route.
Thanks again,
Aaron

Speed up load to ftp server in window server 2008 slow

Dear all.
I have configure FTP in window server 2008 (IIS 7.5...), when I test in LAN speed upload to ftp server is slow ( 60-80 KB/S).
Please help me fix it.
Thanks so much

you should post on IIS forum:
http://forums.iis.net/t/1187778.aspx?Maximum+file+size+for+FTP
http://forums.iis.net/p/1193472/2036340.aspx?Restrict+FTP+upload+file+sizes
try disabling firewall on the ftp server just check if it will help.
Every second counts..make use of it. Disclaimer: This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties or guarantees and confers no rights.

Does installing Desktop Experience on Windows Server 2008 R2 SP1 slow down the server / increase processor usage?

Hello.
I'm running a tekkit classic (Minecraft) Server on a dedicated server I got from OVH, Im just wondering - Im currently using ClamAV for an antivirus, But I would like windows defender.
Im wondering if installing Desktop Experience on my dedi would increase processor usage or slow down the dedi even slightly.
System Specs:
RAM: 32GB DDR3 ECC 1600MHz
CPU: Intel Xeon E3-1245v2
HDD: 2x2TB SATA (Both used, specified as different drives)
OS: Windows Server 2008 R2 SP1
Theres only 1 indev tekkit server currently running on there, Im getting 0-5% processor usage. I may be setting up more modpack servers - but im wondering if installing desktop experience would increase the processor usage or slow the dedi down.
Thanks.
Joseph

Hi Joseph,
This is the forum for Microsoft BizTalk Server, you've asked your question in the wrong forum.
I suggest posting your question in the Windows Server forum
http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/home#forum=winserver2008appcompatabilityandcertification&filter=alltypes&sort=lastpostdesc&content=Search
Glenn Colpaert - MCTS BizTalk Server - Blog : http://blog.codit.eu

How can I speed up logins using MacBooks to a Windows Server 2008 environment. Logging onto the network is extremely slow. We are using a wireless connection to the network in classrooms

I work in an Education environment with Windows Server 2008. I am trying to join our Macbooks to Active Directory. They are joined but the login is extremely slow. I read that this is because of a possible problem with an OS update.

Check the ethernet link speed when connected directly to the TC.. if you are plugged into the modem direct.. and comparing that with wireless on the TC we have no way of knowing where the issue is.
There is some issue related by someone when the TC was bridged.
It is extremely hard to impossible to know what is causing wireless slow down.. needs lots more info.
What is the link speed?
Set manually and try different channels.
The series 1 cannot do 2.4ghz and 5ghz simultaneously but test on 5ghz and see what the speed is like. You will need to be in the same room as the TC.

Why My IMAC OS X 10.6.8 Become Slow On The Network Between Window Server 2008

Dear Sir,
I am using IMAC 10.6.8, processor 3.06 GHz Intel Core i3, Memory 4GB 1333 MHz DDR3 and now my lovely IMAC become slow on the network between window server 2008 and my IMAC.
Kindly advise for the above said issue how can I fix it. I already disable in my IMAC IPV6 and I am connect with airport not ethernet cable and my WIFI is LINKSYS modem and all other windows PC's are connected with the Gigabyte switch.
Awaiting your soonest reply.

Dear Sir,
I am using IMAC 10.6.8, processor 3.06 GHz Intel Core i3, Memory 4GB 1333 MHz DDR3 and now my lovely IMAC become slow on the network between window server 2008 and my IMAC.
Kindly advise for the above said issue how can I fix it. I already disable in my IMAC IPV6 and I am connect with airport not ethernet cable and my WIFI is LINKSYS modem and all other windows PC's are connected with the Gigabyte switch.
Awaiting your soonest reply.

Installation Server Slow on Windows Server 2008 R2

Previously I had two identical servers setup to service SAPGui installs in our corporate office. Both were configured for SAPGui 7.20 Patch 3 and the servers were Windows Server 2003 SP2.
Recently one of these servers was replaced with a newer/faster with more memory Windows Server 2008 R2 box.
I immediately noticed installs to front ends were taking longer when run off the 2008 system. Today I timed installs to two identical front end Win XP computers.
Server 2003 SP2 installed in 7 minutes.
Server 2008 R2 installed in 23 minutes.
Has anyone else experienced this?
Bob H

I have no doubt that the problem in the OS localization.
But, taking into account some facts:
World population is estimated to number 7.126 billion people.
Anglosphere is about 740 million people.
I have not found information about the supported OS languages.
I'm worried about losing my non-English data.
I am for the licensed software, but a trial and registered OS has the same functionality, and displays messages/data in the same way.
I doubt that the OS registration will allow installer to properly finish and even display the error correctly. (Java strings is UTF-based, so, developers should set correct code page. Probably, because system code page can be different with console code page (cp866 for Russian). Current codepage could be view by executing "chcp" in console).
In any case Enterprise-class product should operate correctly on each supported systems, or inform about problems before.

HP P1505n printers-slow print spool on Windows Server 2008-3 minutes to print test page

We have over 50 HP Laserjet P1505n printers setup on our Windows Server 2008 network. Our pcs using Windows XP Pro SP3. These printers are taking 3 minutes to spool a simple print job to the printer. After the page prints, it takes 2 minutes to communicate back to the pc that the job was sent. Eventually, it seems that the printers stop printing altogether because the jobs will error in the queue due to timeouts.
We have tried different settings on our printers and the drivers from the installation cd and HP website. We have seen no difference in performance. The time lag is so substantial that it is wreaking havoc with our users.
We have tried to UNcheck 'use advanced printing features' but this did not help at all.
Can anyone help with this problem? It seems as though these printers were not designed to work with Windows Server 2008, yet they are new model printers.

HP P1505n does not officially support Win Server 2008. However, just as you mentioned that we can use 6L driver as a workaround. BTW, P1505n was launched back to 2007.
I am an employee of HP, but I only speak for myself not for my company

[Windows Server 2008 R2] Slow login as administrator

Hello,
the login as an administrator takes too long (about 70 seconds). As an user I can login faster to the server (OS: Windows Server 2008 R2). It took less than 5 seconds.
There are no unnecessary startup items, neither in the task scheduler. I also checked the registry for damaged user profiles with the file extension ".bak". In the event viewer there's an entry with the ID no. 1530 from the source "User Profile
Service". Is this a suspicious issue? How can I accelerate the login as an administrator?

Hi,
Login to the server with administrator credentials and check for any specific policies implemented for admin account.
run rsop.msc or run a command C:\>gpresult /h adminpol.html & Open html file and search for applied group policies for admin user.
Still problem persists, create another user account with full admin right and check for the difference.
Regards, Ravikumar P

Why does my Cisco router firewall block Windows Server 2012 traffic, but not Windows Server 2008 traffic?

Hello,
   I run a small business network with five physical servers: three Dell servers running Windows Server 2008 R2, one custom build running 2008, and another custom build running 2012 with Domain Controller Role (same hardware for both custom builds).
The Dell servers are all running the Hyper-V role and each has a number of 2008 VMs. I also have a 2012 VM with the Domain Controller Role on one of the Hyper-V servers and another VM with a completely base install of 2012.
   All servers are plugged into a Cisco SG300-52 switch which is uplinked to a Cisco 881 router which is connected to a cable TWC provided Ubee cable modem. I have no VLANs setup. I do have the Firewall on the router configured
to inspect most traffic.
   Here is my problem: I cannot connect to most of the internet on ANY 2012 server (and all exhibit the exact same behavior), but I have NO problems connecting to the internet from 2008 servers. Here is what I already know:
   1.) I can ping the outside world just fine so ICMP is passing to any external host.
   2.) Two of the 2012 servers are DCs running DNS services and they can connect to the internet just fine for DNS requests because they are doing a perfectly good job of providing DNS services to my network.
   3.) Here's where it gets really weird: I can browse in internet explorer to Bing.com and it works. I can also go to a couple other Microsoft websites (though they are very slow). If I click on any link in Bing, however, it doesn't
work and gives me a page not available error. If I connect to a non-MS website like Google or my company website, I get page not available.
    4.) I have tried to telnet to port 80 at Bing and it works. I have tried to telnet to port 80 at google.com and it won't connect. The 2008 servers have no issue telneting to either bing or google on port 80 and none of my client
PCs on the network do either.
    5.) Windows Update will not connect and neither will any other update service such as AVG (I have AVG Antivirus installed WITHOUT firewall on two of the three servers. The base 2012 VM has no software installed and no roles...I built it
just to see if it could connect after a fresh install and it still cannot.)
    6.) The network connection does not indicate limited connectivity (probably because ICMP appears to be passing successfully)
     7.) If I connect the server directly to the modem it has full internet access.
     8.) All internal LAN connectivity is perfectly fine and runs at full speed.
     9.) I have scoured the internet trying to find other examples of this particular kind of connectivity issue on 2012 and I have found two TechNet articles that are similar, but they both had the same resolution: changing the router
worked, but no one knows why. (I would have included the links, but apparently I cannot do that yet)
My question is this: What is different about Windows Server 2012 networking that would render it unable to communicate through a router that Windows Server 2008 has no problems with? I ask because, unlike in these two articles where they were
running personal networking equipment they could easily upgrade, I'm running a Cisco 881 with what should be virtually limitless configuration options and I have no desire to replace it. I have to assume the issue is somehow related to the firewall configuration,
which I could fix easily, but I don't know what to change. If anyone knows what changed in 2012 and why I would be able to browse to bing and other MS sites but no where else, please pass them along. Thanks.

This is the IP Config for the 2012 DC:
Windows IP Configuration
   Host Name . . . . . . . . . . . . : COMPANYDC02
   Primary Dns Suffix . . . . . . . : company.local
   Node Type . . . . . . . . . . . . : Hybrid
   IP Routing Enabled. . . . . . . . : No
   WINS Proxy Enabled. . . . . . . . : No
   DNS Suffix Search List. . . . . . : company.local
Ethernet adapter Ethernet:
   Connection-specific DNS Suffix . :
   Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Intel(R) 82574L Gigabit Network Connection
   Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-25-90-DC-EF-D5
   DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No
   Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes
   Link-local IPv6 Address . . . . . : fe80::81d5:53cf:bd07:14ed%12(Preferred)
   IPv4 Address. . . . . . . . . . . : 10.10.10.202(Preferred)
   Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0
   Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 10.10.10.1
   DHCPv6 IAID . . . . . . . . . . . : 301999504
   DHCPv6 Client DUID. . . . . . . . : 00-01-00-01-1A-96-D5-C3-00-25-90-DC-EF-D5
   DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : 10.10.10.202
                                       10.10.10.221
   NetBIOS over Tcpip. . . . . . . . : Enabled
Tunnel adapter isatap.{9929D989-8E88-4096-A1CB-61F1DB173FA3}:
   Media State . . . . . . . . . . . : Media disconnected
   Connection-specific DNS Suffix . :
   Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Microsoft ISATAP Adapter
   Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-00-00-00-00-00-00-E0
   DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No
   Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes
Tunnel adapter Teredo Tunneling Pseudo-Interface:
   Media State . . . . . . . . . . . : Media disconnected
   Connection-specific DNS Suffix . :
   Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Microsoft Teredo Tunneling Adapter
   Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-00-00-00-00-00-00-E0
   DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No
   Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes
This is the IP Config for the fresh install 2012 VM:
Windows IP Configuration
   Host Name . . . . . . . . . . . . : WIN-800299O7ES6
   Primary Dns Suffix . . . . . . . :
   Node Type . . . . . . . . . . . . : Hybrid
   IP Routing Enabled. . . . . . . . : No
   WINS Proxy Enabled. . . . . . . . : No
   DNS Suffix Search List. . . . . . : company.local
Ethernet adapter Ethernet:
   Connection-specific DNS Suffix . : company.local
   Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Microsoft Hyper-V Network Adapter
   Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-15-5D-0A-5C-02
   DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : Yes
   Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes
   IPv4 Address. . . . . . . . . . . : 10.10.10.49(Preferred)
   Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0
   Lease Obtained. . . . . . . . . . : Saturday, August 23, 2014 10:23:01 PM
   Lease Expires . . . . . . . . . . : Wednesday, August 27, 2014 10:23:01 PM
   Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 10.10.10.1
   DHCP Server . . . . . . . . . . . : 10.10.10.1
   DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : 10.10.10.220
                                       10.10.10.221
   NetBIOS over Tcpip. . . . . . . . : Enabled
Tunnel adapter isatap.company.local:
   Media State . . . . . . . . . . . : Media disconnected
   Connection-specific DNS Suffix . : company.local
   Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Microsoft ISATAP Adapter
   Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-00-00-00-00-00-00-E0
   DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No
   Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes
NOTE: 10.10.10.220 and 10.10.10.221 are the other domain controllers on my network. One of them is 2012 and one of them is 2008. They are both functioning correctly for providing DNS services. The 2012 Virtual DC, however, still has
the internet connectivity issue that this whole post was about in the first place.
NOTE2: When I logged on to COMPANYDC02 this morning, it told me that I had new Windows Updates that needed to be downloaded.   Confused, I checked the most recent time WU had checked for updates at it had successfully checked for updates last night
at 10pm. Of course, it failed when trying to download them, but it appears that once in a while, a connection gets through successfully...

Download issue when Windows 7 Pro joins a Windows Server 2008 Active Directory

Hi,
I purchased 2 new Dell OptiPlex 3010 desktop computers that came with Windows 7 Professional operating system with SP1.
There were no Microsoft updates installed yet. After I added one of these Dell computers to the Windows Server 2008 Active Directory, I was not able to download several items.
Below are several examples:
1) I downloaded the Norton anti-virus installation file. This file is not the full installation of Norton; it is more of a file where you execute it and it will download the full installation from the Internet like from their Norton web
site. So when I executed this installation file, it does not download the full installation files.
It just hung at the screen saying “Downloading” and it will finally stop with an error (don’t remember the error message).
Note: If I have the full Norton installation file then I am able to install it on this computer with no problems.
2) I downloaded the Adobe Reader installation file. This file is not the full installation of Adobe Reader; it is more of a file where you execute it and it will download the full installation from the Internet like from their Adobe web
site. So when I executed this installation file, it hung at the downloading part and then it will error out with a “Actionlist Not Found” message.
Note: If I have the full Adobe Reader installation file then I am able to install it on this computer with no problems.
3) I installed Microsoft Office 2010 Standard version on this computer.
I configured Microsoft Outlook to retrieve emails from my email provider (pop and smtp settings).
After configuring Microsoft Outlook, I was able to send emails through Microsoft Outlook successfully (and very quickly), but he was unable to retrieve my emails. The progress bar for the Receiving in the "Outlook Send/Receive Progress" box
shows no progress. The Progress bar is not moving. There is a message at the bottom of Microsoft Outlook stating "Receiving message 1 of 6 (x.xx KB of x.xx MB)" and it is very slow. My new emails were not being retrieved at all.
I tried various pop and smtp servers that was available for my email provider, but all had the same effect.
4) I can access certain web sites (e.g.
www.yahoo.com, www.cnn.com) while I cannot access other web sites like
www.usatoday.com, my web hosting email site.
Note: I had a Dell computer with Windows XP Professional operating system and this computer does not have any of the above issues.
The above are only a few examples that I have experienced.
If I removed this Dell OptiPlex 3010 computer from the Windows Server 2008 Active Directory then I still experience the same issue.
So as another test, I setup the other new Dell OptiPlex 3010 with the same Windows 7 Professional OS with SP1.
This time, I did not join the Windows Server 2008 Active Directory and I was able to successfully download the full Norton installation files, download the full Adobe Reader installation files, download my emails from Microsoft Outlook 2010, etc.
But once I joined this computer to the Windows Server 2008 Active Directory then I am not able to download these files and emails at all.
It seems like there might be some group policy or a security setting that is preventing these downloads so I disabled the group policy on the Windows Server 2008 AD and Windows 7 Profession OS, but it didn’t resolve the issue.
I disabled all of the firewall programs on this Windows 7 Professional OS, but it still did not resolve the issue.
Since the Windows Server 2008 AD did not have DHCP installed, I installed DHCP and setup a scope.
Then configured the Windows 7 Professional OS to obtain an IP address, but it didn’t resolve the issue.
If I move this Windows 7 Professional computer to another network where it did not have any Active Directory; it just had a wireless router serving DHCP then everything works on the Windows 7 Pro computer.
Any ideas what is the root cause when a Windows 7 Professional computer join a Windows Server 2008 AD?
Thanks,
wl_tech

Hi,
Could you please tell some information for the AD environment and how it connect to the internet?
Regarding 3rd party installlers didn't work as expected, please also seek help in their offical website.
For outlook not receiving emails, could you please take a look in
Event Viewer and see if there are any special errors logged there?
And when trying to access the website like
www.usatoday.com, any special errors IE showed out?
Best regards
Michael Shao
TechNet Community Support

Very slow DFSR on Windows Server 2008

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for