WOTB condition record is coming dirctly to PO

hi,
WOTB condition record is coming dirctly to PO in Production system (WOTB OTB Procurement)
3-4 times this issue highlighted , if i chnge company code/Pur org/ and item prices  it will go
by this WOTB condition record PO value getting double
please give suggestion for stopping this.
Edited by: Praveen Diwan11 on Mar 3, 2011 1:59 PM

Hello,
That is because you have configured like that in the pricing procedure in M/08.
Check your pricing procedure.
If you dont want those condition types to appear as default, just tick the manual entry tick in the pricing schema for those condition types in your procedure.
Check which procedure is assigned to your vendor (through vendor schema group) and pur.org (through pur.org schema group) combination and do as said above.
Regards
Mahesh Naik.

Similar Messages

  • Sales Pricing- Condition record

    Hi
    We have so many condition records
    but while doing sales pricing through ECP, why only few condition record is coming!!
    is there any configuartion missing?
    from where these condition type are getting selected??
    Pls help
    Thanks
    Edited by: shailesh kumar on May 18, 2009 3:01 PM

    Hi,
    The base price is coming from VK11.Other conditions are calculated on the basis of calcaulations as per the Pricing Procedure.Please check with your SD consultant about this.
    Muzamil

  • JCVS condition not coming in PO, Condition record exists (removed manually)

    Hi Gurus,
    I have created a new tax procedure which has the condition type JCVS.
    Condition type has no routines attached to it and the condition record is maintained which is also valid.
    I have also assigned the tax code to the company code in SPRO > Logictics general > Tax on goods mvmt > India > Determination of excise duty > Asssign tax code to company code.
    However when the tax code is applied to a PO the condition type JCVS is not appearing and in analysis it shows Condition record exists (removed manually).
    Please advice what will be the reason.
    Thanks,
    Prakash

    No response.

  • Report for Customer Condition Records

    Hello ABAPers,
    I want to write ABAP report to list out Material,Customer,Tax type and Tax amount. The data is available in tables A005 and KONP and the joining condition would be A005-KNUMH and KONP-KNUMH.
    But since A005 s a Pooled table am not able to write a correct join condition.
    Can any one guide me on how we can write this join condition?
    I tried with FOR ALL ENTRIES IN TABLE but the output was not reading the value of Amount(KONP-KBETR).The amount is coming as zero always.
    The code i'm using is:
        SELECT MATNR KUNNR VKORG VTWEG KSCHL KNUMH INTO TABLE ITAB_JEXP FROM A005 WHERE KSCHL = 'JEXP'.
    IF NOT ITAB_JEXP IS INITIAL.
        SELECT  KNUMH KOPOS KSCHL KBETR  INTO TABLE ITAB FROM KONP FOR ALL ENTRIES IN ITAB_JEXP
                WHERE KNUMH = ITAB_JEXP-KNUMH AND KSCHL = ITAB_JEXP-KSCHL.
      APPEND ITAB.
    ENDIF.
    LOOP AT ITAB_JEXP.
    MOVE-CORRESPONDING ITAB_JEXP TO ITAB.
    APPEND ITAB.
    ENDLOOP.
    Thanks,
    B P Shah
    Message was edited by:
            Bhavin P Shah

    Hi,
       Use FOR ALL ENTRIES  for that joins are not allowed on cluster n pooled tables
    refere these
        LOOP AT it_kjmseg INTO wa_kjmseg.
          lv_index = sy-tabix.
    *--Select condition record number from table A006
          SELECT SINGLE
                 knumh
                 FROM a006
                 INTO lv_knumh
                 WHERE kappl EQ 'V'
                 AND   kschl EQ 'ZR00'
                 AND   vkorg EQ '0010'
                 AND   vtweg EQ '00'
                 AND   pltyp EQ '01'
                 AND   waerk EQ 'USD'
                 AND   matnr EQ wa_kjmseg-matnr
                 AND   datbi GT wa_kjmseg-fkdat.
          IF sy-subrc NE 0.
    *--Select condition record number from table A004
            SELECT SINGLE
                   knumh
                   FROM a004
                   INTO lv_knumh
                   WHERE kappl EQ 'V'
                   AND   kschl EQ 'ZR00'
                   AND   vkorg EQ '0010'
                   AND   vtweg EQ '00'
                   AND   matnr EQ wa_kjmseg-matnr
                   AND   datbi GT wa_kjmseg-fkdat.
          ENDIF.
    Regards,
    Prashant

  • Different Tax condition records picked on sales order and invoice

    Dear Expert,
    I have a scenario where the goods supply from plant to different country sales organization customer. it is a n export order.
    . sales order has been processed with ship to address in Portugal. We did enter end user VATnumber on the ship to customer. When you look under conditions the MWST is 0.00 which means VAT will not be invoiced.
    while creating the order MWST condition calculated correctly by using the export access sequence, but when creating the invoice w r t sales order i am getting the domestic tax access sequence record.
    in my case it is wrong, the same sales order MWST condition amount needs to be copied to invoice as well.
    after going to condition tab of that billing document, select MWST and click on "Condition Record" I found below different values in sd order conditions and invoice conditions:
    invoice:
    SD-Order:
    Can you kindly help me on this? :-)
    Regards,
    Yashar

    Ideally, you should have a different pricing procedure for domestic and exports and I am not sure, why you have not created one more pricing procedure for exports.
    Coming to your query, it seems, the issue is VAT registration number in which case, have a look at the following notes:-
    Note  371764 - VAT registration number: Destination country
    Note 15244 - Incorrect VAT amount is displayed
    Note 148505 - VAT registrtn.no.fr.ship-to & n.fr.sold-to party
    G. Lakshmipathi

  • Missing Condition record price in PO history tab

    Hi
    I have a scenario where in the condition record values are coming in conditions tab of PO and the discounts are calculated and shows net price which is less than the Gross price in conditions tab, But when i check in Purchase order history tab, for goods receipt, only Gross price is coming not the Net price.
    can any one help in this??

    Hi,
       The po price will be greyed out if the price is determined based on discount or similar conditions. You have to change the price at item level - conditions tab.
       But in your issue, the PO is already having subsequent documents. (Hope you found the issue in dev only, not in PRD) You may cancel the already posted documents (GR and IR). Now, correct the condition type (acrual flag in M/06) and then assign the acrual key against the condition type in the pricing schema in M/08. Assign the GL account for the acrual key in OBYC. Create a new PO and test the scenario again.
    Regards,
    AKPT

  • Condition type not coming in sales order

    Hi,
    we have a condition type Z026. The issue is that  it is not set in the order but the condition records exists. The pricing analysis shows that condition reocrd is missing but the fact is the condition record is there. The acess seq is Z026 and there are many tables in the acess sequence.
    The first table in the access seq is 906 and the condition record exists but still the system says that the condition record is not found using  cond preliminary step (header fields like customer/sales org/div). the cond record is maintained for  relevant sales org/dist channel/customer/material. cond preliminary step means that system first looks for the header fields but everything is there.
    The condition is active and the conditon is created on 21.7.10 with validitity from 21.7.10 to 31.1.2010 and the pricing date in sales order is 27.7.10. so everyhting is fine but yet the condition is not coming in sales order
    what could be the issue.
    regds

    Hi,
    Now try creating a sales order with 20.07.2010 as the pricing date. It will work. Create another order with 21.07.2010 and it will not work. If so, it is due to the validity date. When you give 21.07.2010 as validity date and there is already another record which was valid on that date, the gap of one day can happen and we have experienced this. There is even an OSS note explaining this concept, which makes sense business-wise.
    However you check the scenarios I have mentioned. If the behaviour is as I have mentioned, then you have to change the pricing date of your problamatic sales order to one day earlier, or move the validity date one day earlier.
    If the behaviour is different, pls lemme know

  • Purchase order netprice without condition record

    Hi All,
    We are trying to create a PO and there is no condition record exists for the material,but the system still pulls the price.
    Could any body tell me where this netprice is coming from?
    There is an inforecord exists for this material and vendor but no condition records are being maintained.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Venkat

    Hi Venkat,
    The price will be picked from info record or last po(with that material and vendor combination) or contract or condition records.
    This is the priority level.
    Regards,
    Prasath

  • 499 Step Number for condition record?

    Hello Everyone,
    In ECC6,  Quotation print output AN00 is not showing price per unit for some items. I checked in debug, there seem to be a condition record with step number 499 (which does not have a condition type) that is missing values for XKOMV-KBERT. When I populate this value in debug, it shows up find in the output. Step number 499 is not in KONV.  What logic does SAP use to come up with these values for step number 499?
    I know this may sound like an ABAP question but it is not. I think some pricing is not configured right. There is a calculation type condition but it is only populating field KWERT.
    TIA,
    Lyn

    Hi lyn
    Check in your piricing procedure V/08 wheather , in the step 499 what has been maintained any text type ? and if condition type has been maintained. , check wheather condition record has been maintained or not ? and also check wheather that  value is coming in the sales order or not .
    check for the step 499 wheather in print feild it  has been checked or not .
    Regards
    Srinath

  • Mapping error while downloading the condition records (ECC to CRM)

    Hello Experts,
    We were downloading the condition records from ECC to CRM system (Production), but due to Mapping error, it was unsuccessful, i wonder what's going wrong there.
    When i see in SMQ2 (CRM Inbound Queue), an queue got stucked there, i.e, R3AD_ZDNL_COND_A930 having SYSFAIL status.
    While debugging the queue, I have found that the queue got stuck because of u2018Mapping Erroru2019.
    I found inside, Standard code reads the record from table /SAPCND/T681 (Condition Table Structure) for KAPPL = 'CRM', KVEWE = 'PR', KOTABNR = 'CUS930' and AS4LOCAL = u2018Au2019 for which the value of VAKEY_OFFSET is maintained as 0.
    If system finds the value of VAKEY_OFFSET is Zero(0) then it will change the download type from D (Delta) to M (Mapping Error) and raise the error & block the Inbound Queue in CRM.
    I checked in SMW01alsofor getting some more knowledge about that queue, here the error description:
    Structure information for table CNCCRMPRCUS930 not available (Message class: CND_MAP)
    Error when carrying out delta download (Message class: CND_MAP)
    I am a technical guy and dont have much idea in CRM Middleware.
    I welcome your valuable thoughts and will award full points.
    Regards,
    Jeo

    Hi,
    As you mentioned i checked for the followings:
    >>In Maintain field catalog:
    I found only 2-3 fields are maintained here, when i compared with A930 (A930 in ECC system).
    >>Create condition tables:
    I checked it for CUS930, i found the same but condition table structure name like CNCCRMPRCUS930 are missing. Is that important? Because i see in SMW01, same error is coming over there : Structure information for table CNCCRMPRCUS930 not available .
    Please suggest me, now what i need to do?
    Regards,
    Jeo
    Edited by: Jeo Denson on Dec 1, 2011 4:11 PM

  • Pricing error; ''Condition record exists, but has not been set''

    hello friends
    we created the order (credit memo req), refer to this created the credit memo.
    in the order one line item and only 2 condition records
    base price and tax (MWST)
    in the order both conditions are coming and in the invoice it is not showing the condition (mwst)  and in the Analysis it is showing as ''Condition record exists, but has not been set''
    what would be the reason?
    regards
    siva

    Hi,
    if both the condition types are showing in the order then you need to update pricing in billing because sometimes when u chnage any condtion value for base price after creation of order then system is not able to find valid condition record at billing document level.
    Narasimha

  • Excise duty 4% diff. while MIRO posting after FV12 condition record change

    Hi Gurus,
    Iam coming straight to the CRUX of the matter.
    Iam working for a client and facing a support problem.
    I got an issue that recently Government has reduced excise rate from 14% to 10%
    But PO already created with 14%.Later the condition record changed to 10% in FV12.
    then only  MIGO posted.
    while doing MIRO iam getting 4% difference value
    why is it so?
    Please help me in this regard.
    I also attached the screen shot in the link given below
    [http://rapidshare.com/files/184718013/MIRO__ED__14_.rtf.html]
    Regards,
    Anbu

    HI
    Check your PO creation date and condition record validity date (FV12) an MIRO posting date.
    Thank You

  • Condition records for Material

    Hi,
    We have made a systems like  Package material  means  We have one material with item category ZBOM  which is the main material and for this material we have made BOM with different line items  when we enter package material in VA01  system automatically selecting all the BOM of that material and all are coming in VA01 ,  but the price which we have maintain in VK11  is as per sales org./customer/ship toparty/price group /material  , 
    problem is that we are not able to maintain diffrent price according to diffrenet header material for same customer
    Customer 1 : Header material   : ABC    Cat.  ZBOM  having 3 ITEMS CAt. TAN
    Customer 1" Header material :  XYZ      CAT. aZBOM  having 4 items , 3 items are same as in ABC  AND FOURTH ITEMS IS DIFFRENT ,
    HERE WE WANT TO MAINTAIN THE CONDITION RECORD
       CUSTOMER/ SHIP TO PARTY / HEADER MATERIAL / MATERIAL.
    how to do it as only one material filed can be select in table             .
    regards,
    zafar

    hi zafar
    Though its not clear from your question whether your materials in BOM share same grouping or not,I can suggest u 2 alternatives
    1. Use a  material pricing group (KONDM) for each  group of materials ,say aluminum foil ,plastic containers ,Cartoons etc.
    And then create access sequence for a special discount surcharge condition in pricing using this field. e.g. Sales Org >>Dist.ch>;.material pricing group.
    Add this to appropriate step in pricing procedure.
    2. If you can not identify and group materials in this way ,u can try using item category which will differentiate materials used as header and item  at sales order level.
    For this u ahve to take help of ABAP  and add item category to your field catalogue and then use this filed in access sequence.or use to trigger pricing through routine.
    I hope this will solve the issue.
    Regards
    Mandar

  • Additional Field for Condition Record ..............

    Hi Gurus
    Plz read the Question Properly
    I know that for adding a new field as key field for condition record , one needs to append the structure( main ) KOMPAZ so that the field appears in KOMP structure .
    Say want Shiiping Point as one of fields in Condition Records. ....VSTEL field
    Now when the field appears in KOMP , then we can CREATE CONDITION RECORD FOR THE SAME
    FOR EG: *SALES ORG - DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL-CUSTOMER-SHIPPING POINT-MATERIAL..... BASED MATERIAL PRICING
    WHAT I FAIL TO UNDERSTAND
    1.WHY WE PASS SHIPPING POINT ( VSTEL) FIELD FROM LIKP -VSTEL TABLE TO NEW FIELD DEFINED.
    2.LIKE SALES ORG/ DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL ALSO ARE DEFINED IN ENTERPRISE STRUCTURE AND VALUE IN CONDITION RECORD IS PICKED FROM THERE ONLY, WHY NOT SHIPPING POINT.
    WHY THIS ??????....
    Supply the new field you defined by including the following source code line in
    USEREXIT_PRICING_PREPARE_TKOMP:
    MOVE xxxx-VSTEL TO TKOMP-ZZVSTEL.
    In order processing you find the user exit in Include MV45AFZZ, and in billing document processing you find it in Include RV60AFZZ.
    Regards
    Rohit

    > Plz read the Question Properly
    I read the question properly ;-).
    > WHAT I FAIL TO UNDERSTAND
    >
    > 1.WHY WE PASS SHIPPING POINT ( VSTEL) FIELD FROM LIKP -VSTEL TABLE TO NEW FIELD DEFINED.
    The first thing you need to understand is that the condition records value is not based upon the the enterprise structure which you have defined. Rather it will pick value from the sales documents which we have created. The reason behind including this LIKP-VSTEL is that only, Just imagine, where you are using condition records??? in Sales order, in delivery, in billing..... and based on the data passed in these documents your condition records will be populated.
    Again for example : you have maintained record for Sales org 1000, DC 10, division 00 shipping point 1000 then the record will come into the document provided the document should fulfill these all.
    I hope this will make you understand this.
    > 2.LIKE SALES ORG/ DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL ALSO ARE DEFINED IN ENTERPRISE STRUCTURE AND VALUE IN CONDITION RECORD IS PICKED FROM THERE ONLY, WHY NOT SHIPPING POINT.
    No the records are only coming from the Sales documents. only.
    Thanks,
    Raja

  • Condition records for JMIP

    Hi
    Can any one tell how to maintain condition records for JMIP(BED),JAIP(AED),JSIP(sed)?. Rewards guaranteed
    regards
    B shar

    Hi
    I ve maintained through fv11 for JMIP. Now the percentage is showing in PO item detail  -  invoice tab - taxes. But during MIGO still warning message comes BED for excise item is zero. Then i used t code J1IEX for capturing excise . here in the item level - Duty rates tab % is showing for BED (same % maintained through fv11). But in duty value tab no value is coming. If we check the document then two messages comes an error message - excise details are not maintained for vendor, and the same warning message - BED for excise item is zero. What more settings to be done? Pls look into the issue
    regards
    B shar

Maybe you are looking for