Write-off (Mvt type: 551) in batch
Hi experts, as titled, I am looking for ways to do write-off using movement type 551 in batch, as in doing write-off for a couple of sites (stores) at the same time.
I have come up with below.
1. Either to do stock adjustment (e.g. MIGO, MB1C, MB1A) in batch, but the standard only supports doing adjustment one site by one site
2. Use T-code MI31 which supposedly can support adjustment in batches, but it has predetermined movement type of 701/702.
Would you have other greater methods for this scenario?
Thanks and BR
Dom
Hi Dom,
what do you mean one site by one site? Each document line has it's own plant, you can have different plants in different lines...
regards,
Edgar
Similar Messages
-
Scrap HU via HUMO - mvt type 551 doesn't req internal order
Hi there --
I want to require Internal Order (CO/PP order) on movement type 551 / scrap transactions. I made the CO/PP order a required entry via OMBW, and now when I process a 551 via MB1A, the internal order is required as expected. However, if I scrap a handling unit via HUMO (Edit > Change HU Posting > Other Postings > Pick for scrapping), the system does not require (or even allow) me to enter an internal order. I am able to save the transaction, and a 551 movement is processed without an internal order on the FI posting.
Any ideas on what's going on here and how I can ensure that the order number is required in HUMO for scrap txns???
Thanks!
AllisonI logged an OSS note with SAP about the inability to support the internal order number entry via the HUMO transaction.
They replied:
Unfortunately there is no standard possibility to make this field
available for any movements with HUMO (Main Program SAPLHUMO) in
standard. You only will reach your expectation with a modification in
the logic of the SAP Standard solution. Please check note 170183.
The customizing table MIGO_CUST_FIELDS, is where fields are set to
obligatory or optional. This table is specifically for setting fields obligatory or optional
when the movement is done through the transaction MIGO and other IM
transactions. The table description for MIGO_CUST_FIELDS as follow-
[MIGO: Field Selection per Movement Type]
Has anyone attempted this type of Mod? -
Dears,
The customer accidentally wrote off the complete Storage Type 999 via LI21.
We were able to retrieve the full list of articles and quantities of what was written off. In order to restore the situation, we would like to 'refill' Storage Type 999 with these articles.
Could someone please advice on how to accomplish this? (Inventory on all involved articles is too time-consuming)
Thanks in advance.
MAs per Jacob suggestion you can go with 711 if 712 is posted or 712 if 711 is posted but the basic question is if there is no stock mismatch then why the stock was there in 999 is there any business need to store the stock in 999 as per standard SAP 999 is resolution and ideally if any stock exist then you should reconcile that
-
Dear Friends,
Is there a transaction or Report available to see the write-off stock by plant or through any movement types ? Please suggest
the requirement is as fallows:
Report needs to be selectable by IPC or ICC. Or plant
The report will need to show the stock that has been written off in Quantity of the item, the cost of this stock. And where the stock was written off.
The report should provide a total cost per plant and a total cost per item. At that plant. Where multiple locations are viewed the total cost sum for the plants should be provided.
Regards
PrakashHi Prakash
Could you please clarify the following
1. Is this write-off stock means stock posted to scrapping (551 mvmt)?
2. What do you mean by IPC and ICC?
If you can able to bifurcate the write-off through mvmt 551 (or any other) you may get all your requirements in MB51 report itself.
Thanks/ GVRR -
Hide/Suppress Cost center field in MIGO and MB1A for movement types 551&552
Hi All,
Can anybody tell me how to suppress or hide the cost center field in MIGO or MB1A for movement types 551 and 552?
I did below settings and it worked fine for only MB1A and for MIGO still it is showing cost center field.
IMG > Materials Management > Inventory Management and Physical Inventory >Goods Issue/Transfer posting > Define screen layout > select movement type to change the option.
Also I did gothrough the settings for Enjoy transaction (MIGO) there we have only option to make fields either "Required entry" or "Optional entry" and we don't have an option to hide/suppress.
Please advise or help me .
Thanks in advance!
Regards,
PraveenHi
The cost center field is a required field in mvt type 551 as you are scrapping materials, some cost center will need to take the cost of this operation.
Anyway, you first need to make the field as optional for example, before you move.
One option is that you create a screen variant in Tcode SHD0 for MB1A, where 551 is setup as constant (with content) , and mark Cost center as invisible and assign this screen variant to a transaction in SE93.
regards
Sidi -
Add New field in OMJJ for MB1B mvt type: 303
Hello Experts,
I need your help in resolving an issue:
I am tring to add a Field: "LFSNR" in OMJJ for Tcode: MB1B and Movement type: 303. but i am getting the error: "Field LFSNR is not
allowed for transaction type 303" as this field doesnt exist in table: T156B / MIGO_CUST_FIELDS.
Please help me with your thoughts as how can i add a new field to T156B / MIGO_CUST_FIELDS and then in OMJJ for 303 mvt type.
We are on ECC 6 EHp4.
regards
VenkatHi Venkat,
You may check this first: Re: Scrap HU via HUMO - mvt type 551 doesn't req internal order
Thanks,
Gordon -
Using movement type 551 in Production Order
Hi all
I want to do a mvt type 551 of components to the Production order but it allows me only a 261 movement type. Is there a way we can do that.
thanksHello John,
551 is a transaction for scrapping inventory against a cost center. In a way, 261 is doing the same txn by moving inventory from stock to Process order.
Why are you trying to perform a 551 against a process order? There might be another solution to the business issue.
Regards,
Anand -
Reversal of Mvt type 552(MB1A) still doesn't reflect in the Process order
Hello Experts,
When i create in MB1A using 551 movement type(scrap), i fill the required entries Cost Center and Proces order then saved it. Checked the process order cost analysis (GO TO- COSTS - ANALYSIS- TARGET ACTUAL COMPARISON)there were values appearing in my total/actuals cost column.
Then my issue is if i want to reverse the said document generated from 551 movement type using tcode MB1A or MBST, the value in the cost analysis is not changing((GO TO- COSTS - ANALYSIS- TARGET ACTUAL COMPARISON) in the process order.
The reversal is done so it should be zero and no value is appearing in the cost analysis column.
Also if you will check in the Process order- GO TO-LISTS- DOCUMENTED GOODS MOVEMENTS , the mvt type 551 only appears and no 552 even the cancellation is already performed.
Thanks,
IndraWhich version of SAP are you using?
Could you please perform same action in development using MIGO transaction code. -
Automatic creation of Batch using mvt type 311
when i am trying to transfer material from one storage location to another using mvt type 311. the system is not creating the batch automaticcally.
I have already maintained allthe basic configuration required for this.even in IMg ->logistic general->batch management---->creation of new batch in this path also for mvt type 311 i mainatined (automatical/manual without check)batch creation.but still the system is not generating the new batch.
Can anybody help in this issue.
Thanks in advanceHi,
When you do transfer postings, SAP will set the batch number same as the one from which you are issuing the stock. To avoid this you can set the creation of batch to B (Automatic/ Manual with check in user exit)
You need to use following user exit at batch creation
EXIT_SAPLV01Z_001
EXIT_SAPLV01Z_002
Hope this helps, reward if useful,
Best Regards VS -
Batch does not exist for mvt typ 411 K
Hi Experts,
While i am perform migo for mvt type 411 K,it shows Batch does not exist but i check in MMBE,the batch for this vendor consignment was exist with stock.
Any advice?
Thank you.How did the batch go into your system? with an initial load program, or with a standard MIGO movement?
-
MR11 Write-Offs (KP doc type) not clearing
A maintenance adjustment transaction (MR11) was executed to 'write-off' the open receipts on a purchase order. All purchase order items have the same accounting (Profit Center, GL Acct, Comp Code). The MR11 transaction creates a KP (account maintenance document) which is posted against the PO line and is cleared against the receipt accounting document(s).
A clearing document should be created to offset the receipt/invoice document with the maintenance document.
For some reason, part of the items that were 'maintenanced' on the PO did not get cleared, while other items did get cleared. Our internal SAP GL super users have reviewed the documents and cannot understand why some of these did not clear.
Thoughts?Hi
Please check whether there are "quantity differences" in those POs. If not, then MR11 will not do. Also please check whether the account assignment of those POs are "order". If so, settlement is the way forward to close the PO.
Jayaram -
OMB6- scrap material with 551 mvt type
dear experts
even though I put the cost center as optional for the movement type 551, in OMB6 and also on the program RM07CUFA.
When I do a MIGo and use 551 movement tyype the system is asking for a cost center as a mandatory entry, even though I put Gl acct in the acct assignment on MIGO.
Please let me know, how can I just scrap material without inputting cost center or a profit center.
Thank you
MSJYou probably cannot, if you use profit center and cost center accounting, you may want to ask your FICO collegues for confirmation.
But in OKB9 you can setup a default cost center for this process. -
Write off process--BAPI/FM ?
Hi All,
I've a requirement to do write off goods using a program.
I've gone through this thread: [write-off the MM inventory stock;
However, I need a FM or BAPI to pass movement type 551 and cost center?
I understand to write off, that has to be 'borne' by a cost center..so, should I pass cost center also?
Also would appreciate what other implications/ considerations I've to make while carrying out the write off process?
sorry, if am re-posting and this has been answered already..I did some searching but couldn't find hence posting.
Regards,
Raghu.thanks! I was in the wrong direction I was looking for an Inventory Adjustment process which is done using cycle count and differences posted using MI07 which uses movement type 701/702. So decided to use BAPI_MATPHYSINV_POSTDIFF with phy inventory document and fiscal yr etc..
Regards,
Raghu. -
Write off Stock at Subcontractor End
Hi Experts,
We want to write off the stock lying at stock subcontractor end in SAP thru Physical Inventory Adjustment. No storage location is assigned to subcontractor stock in SAP. Therefore we are finding it difficult to do it thru MI01, MI04, MI07.
Please guide how it is possible
Regards
( Rajneesh Gulati )Why do Physical Inventory, presumably the SC is telling you, you aren't physically checking. Why not just process a goods issue to destruction, Movement Type 551 etc., through MIGO for O stock category ?
Cheers,
Nick -
Write-off the MM inventory stock
Dear expert,
I want write-off the MM inventory stock which is expired, please give the step & procedure.
Regards,
PKDear Learn New,
PI Process -
Creation of Physical Inv Doc by MI01
Entering ZERO COUNT (Tick of ZC Box in PI Document by T CD - MI04
and posting the document by MI07 (individual document) or MI20( List of documents)
System will adjust inventory automatically by 702 movement type as a issue and financial impact will be in Loss Account as loss due to Physical imbalance in stock.
You can alternatively withdraw stock for Scrapping by movement type 551.
Thanks
Raghavan
Maybe you are looking for
-
Multiple tables with the possibility of multiple records in each table
Post Author: viper CA Forum: .NET Hi I have been trying for a few days now to come up with a CR solution to displaying data from multiple tables. These tables, in some cases, have more then one record that needs to be displayed. This is basically w
-
Fact Not Found Business Rules Error
Hi I am encountering the following fault while executing one of the condition of the rule. The other condition works fine. Can anyone please tell me the reason for this error, I have asserted the fact with values and also am not getting any errors in
-
IDOC (BLAORD03) could not be saved..
Hello all, When we create GOA in SRM and after approval.. it is not getting distributed to ECC.. When we debug, RFC Call, in ECC there is no IDOC Generated against to this Contract Number.. And the call in failing with the following discription IDOC
-
How to kill db-session when explored is closed?
Hi all, Is there an easy way to kill database sessions when the explorer window is closed?. I tried to set the "disconnect application module upon release" checkbox on the module, but than my application doesn't work correctly... I'm getting errors l
-
Just set up a brand new Imac and have experienced multiple serious issues to the point where I'm wondering if CS is a good product at all. I upgraded to the creative cloud in the belief that any bugs I was experiencing had been worked out. My first i