Consolidated companies 1000 and ' ' are different

Can anyone tell me the how to solve this error "Consolidated companies 1000 and ' ' are different" which I am getting in F-04
Thanks,
Madan

Hi
Yes you are correct, transports required through to production for this.
The side affect of this I think is that if there are any documents (containing the document types that you have chnaged) posted while this chnage is in production, it would mean that those documents would be populated by the Partner Business Place (ie second company code) in their header record if they cross company codes. That would mean that they could then later be cleared from the second company code against the first. Also when changing the Intra Posting flag on the documnet type do an F1 Help on the filed and consider the SAPHelp on that topic.
Overall I don't think this would be a big issue. But anyway if you transport this through at a period that is planned as low system activity this should ensure you don't post any docs while the chnage is in place and youy are doing the clearing.
Regardss
Michael

Similar Messages

Error through F-44 that Consolidated companies 1000 and ' ' are different

Dear Expert
At the time of Vendor clearing through F-44 I get the
warning message that "Withholding tax information ignored"
where Withholding tax related customization and master has
been updated accordingly. If I ignore the same warning
and save the document as my all Debit and Credit transactions
are of equal amount ,i m getting the error that "Consolidated
companies 1000 and ' ' are different.
What specific setting is required for the same.
Thanks in advance
VG

Hi,
If you are getting error F5 080 then most probably this is because one of the documents to be cleared contains a different trading partner (field BSEG-VBUND).
Please check the contents of each customer/vendor line item concerning this field. The field can be viewed on the customer/vendor line item via button 'more data'. If the contents is different you have either to clear the items individually or you have to change the settings of the document type used for clearing. You can find out what document type is used for clearing in OBXH in the 'transfer with postings section'. Afterwards you can go to OBA7 and mark the flags 'Inter-company postings' and 'Enter trading partner'.
I hope this helps.
Regards
Ravinagh Boni

Consolidated companies 1000, 1500 are different

hi ,
when tried to do PGI(post goods issue) i am getting the below error
"consolidated companies (1000, 1500) are different ".
please suggest me .
regards,
deepa

PGI is the point where FI entries related to goods getting delivered are genereated.
Normally Finished Goods and Cost of Goods Sold GL of the same comapny are hit.
I guess in the particular case Finished Goods GL of one company code and cost of goods sold of different company is getting hit.
Thanks,
Ashish

Consolidated companies KGOI and ' ' are different

Hi team,
While clearing TDS Salary GL system showing below error
Consolidated companies KGOI and ' ' are different
     Message no. F5080
Diagnosis
     The number of the affiliated company must be clear for the selected
     document type for all line items. In this case at least two different
     companies or a company in connection with a business partner who does
     not belong to a company are stated.
Procedure
     If you selected the correct accounts, you must enter the document with a
     document type that allows cross-company posting. Otherwise, please
     correct the entered account.
Actually what we done..........
1) In salary entry which was passed by HR payroll, we have distributed cost from company Code-2011 to another company code-5011.
2) Manse some staff in 2011 cost booked in another company code 5011.
3) in that way system passed automatic inter-company transaction, which is correct.
5) but while doing clearing of inter company GLs & other accounts wherever these type of document selected then system throwing above error.
Please guide use.

Hi
Yes you are correct, transports required through to production for this.
The side affect of this I think is that if there are any documents (containing the document types that you have chnaged) posted while this chnage is in production, it would mean that those documents would be populated by the Partner Business Place (ie second company code) in their header record if they cross company codes. That would mean that they could then later be cleared from the second company code against the first. Also when changing the Intra Posting flag on the documnet type do an F1 Help on the filed and consider the SAPHelp on that topic.
Overall I don't think this would be a big issue. But anyway if you transport this through at a period that is planned as low system activity this should ensure you don't post any docs while the chnage is in place and youy are doing the clearing.
Regardss
Michael

Error: Consolidated companies DCIUS and ' ' are different

Hi All,
When I try to post vendor invoice in FB60 I get the above given error . Message No. F5080.
I have created a group company and assigned to the expense GL account master in trading partner field.
GL is mapped to the group GL account.
No error is shown if I enter the group company id in the vendor master in the "trading partner" field.
But the vendor is not a cross company. My understanding is, we use the trading partner field in vendor master only if the vendor is an affiliated company.
What could be the reason for the error and how can I resolve this ?
Thanks
Anil

Hi Murali,
Thanks for your reply.
1. This is not an inter co postings. So I don't find any need to activate the same in doc type.
2. The error is shown only when I remove trading partner from vendor master (vendor is not a cross company).
3. Consolidation is required. But I have given the trading partner and group GL in all the GL accounts.
So I am at a loss why this error occurs.
Thanks
Anil

Consalidated companies 0 and are different

Hello Experts,
When I am processing with f-06 am getting the error consolidate companies 0 and ' ' are different.This is happening when it is with more than one customer.I have gone through some threads in forum but it is all about vendor and document type,but in my case it is when i use multiple customer.Please explain as to how i will proceed with that.
Thanks

Hello Binoj,
The message number is f5080
Diagnosis
The number of the affiliated company must be clear for the selected document type for all line items. In this case at least two differen companies or a company in connection with a business partner who does not belong to a company are stated.
Procedure
If you selected the correct accounts, you must enter the document with a document type that allows cross-company posting. Otherwise, please correct the entered account.

F.13 clearing SAPMF05A 0700 E    F5 080 Consolidated companies UTCL and '

Hi All
I am getting the following error message while clearing customer transactions through F.13 and F-32
SAPMF05A 0131 S    F5 074 2 items were selected
SAPMF05A 0700 E    F5 080 Consolidated companies UTCL and ' ' are different
anyone can help in this?
rgds/Reddy
Edited by: kpkreddy on Aug 30, 2010 1:55 PM

Hi Reddy,
Please check the document type used in OBXH and select UMBUCHNG check for document type assigned there defalut is AB
ensure document type AB have Inter-company posting checked in OBA7
Edited by: Ravi Rana on Aug 30, 2010 2:15 PM

F.13 Consolidated companies " " and " " are different

Hello gurus,
I have seen many threads on this, but I have yet to find one to answer my particular issue.
When we run F.13, we are getting the error message stated in the subject line above. We are using two document types here:
WE: Goods receipt
RE: Incoming invoice
I have checked the document types in OBA7, and both have been flagged to "Allow Inter-company posting" and "Enter Trading Partner".
I have checked the Master data for the vendor and the trading partner field is filled in. I can not clear out this field, since it is used for some of our quarterly reporting.
When I go into FBL3N to look at the item lines, I am seeing that the items lines with document type WE (goods receipt) is pulling the number in the master data in to the trading partner field. This is correct.
However, when I look in FBL3N at the item lines with document type RE (incoming invoice) the trading partner field is blank. We enter out invoices via MIRO.
Does anyone know why the "RE" document is not pulling in the trading partner number?
Thanks for your help,
Rhonda

Hello Dominic,
Here is how I have the document types configured:
WE: (Goods receipt), has the "Allow inter-company posting" flagged on. Plus, the posted document has the trading partner displayed.
RE: (Incoming invoice), has the "Allow inter-company posting" flagged off. Plus, the posted document does not have the trading partner dispalyed.
So, it matches your train of thought in above response. However, I am still getting the same error on the pre-existing documents.
Then I have tried every other combination between the two document types and I keep getting the same error. The pre-existing documents will not clear.
Is there a way to update the trading partner field in the pre-existing documents?
Sorry for all the questions.
I really appreciate all that you have done for me.
Thank you so much for your help,
Rhonda

F5080 error: Consolidated Companies & and & are different - HR

Hi Experts
We are trying to post the payroll and error F5080 comes up. It refers to Trading partner and / or Intercompany posting which I have set in the document type. I have searched the net and OSS, but can't find a solution for HR.
Can anyone please help?
Kind regards
Dawn

Hi,
For that Document Type, in control data- uncheck intercopany postings

Consolidated companies are different

Hi,
User is trying to make an invoice through MIRO, he is getting the error as consolidated companies are different. pls suggest.
Regards,
venki

Hi,
User is trying to make an invoice through MIRO, he is getting the error as "consolidated companies xxxx and " are different". pls suggest.
Regards,
venki

GRIR clearing: Different consolidation companies?

Hi All,
While trying to clear the GRIR account manually, I was trying to match two line items from one document to another document. They balance however, I'm not able to clear these as I get the following error:
'Consolidated companies WE1LC and ' ' are different"
I don't know Consolidation well, so it will be helpful if someone can tell me what to do and help me with how Consolidation is to be done.
Thanks,
Tejas

Thanks Sridhar! It worked!

SEM-BCS how to make Consolidation Unit with Business Area

Hi all,
I am newbie in SEM-BCS and implementing BW-based BCS. Our situation is as follows.
Situation
- we have 7 companies worldwide and 4 different Business areas.
   Every company consists of at least two business areas in R/3.
- we have sales transaction in FI among companies.
requirement
- we need consolidated F/S in whole consolidation group and consolidated F/S in Business area level.
actually, we are planning to make the consolidation unit in company level.
Do we have to break down consolidation unit in business area? or just breakdown category solves our requirement?
If we have sales transaction even between business areas within certain company, do we have to make it in business area?

Following are the answer to your questions
Q:   What to do for using this cube in BCS?
A:    Add the business area to the cube. Generate the data basis and the business area gets added to all ODS/DSO , virtual cube.
Suggestion: To avoid deleting the Profit center cube, since you can reduce the complication.
Q:   Is it the problem about DATA BASIS Role?
A:   No. Assign the role of subassignment or consolidation unit as needed. If you are giving the role of consolidation unit to business area, you need to insert the char Partner business area also in the cube.
Q:   Is there some materials to solve this situation?
A:   Refer the matrix consolidation material in help.sap.com from BCS portion. As per SAP literature any relevant object can be made as second consolidation unit such as business area, functional area etc. Dont fear. Once you start it the issue will be resolved in few days.
Expected complication:
If you are going to make business area as subassignment then it is simple. But if you are making business area as Consolidation unit, go for partner business area in cube.
Ensure with your BI consultant that all BCS messages are addressed in BI infoobject for business area specifically.
Things can get complicated only if we allow for it get complicated. But you are doing great.. Keep posted.. Good luck.!!!..

Utilization(J2IUN) in case of Sales plant and Mfg plants are different

Hello,
we are having two company codes 1000 and 2000,
1000 is having the Manufturing plant- 1000
2000 is having the sales plant - 2000
Both the plant are having the same excise group-10
The company will procure a materials in 1000 plant and CENVAT is credited at 1000 Plant. The 1000 plant never dispatch materials to customers, The company want to take Monthly utilization from 2000 company code and 2000 plant.
The company first make STO from 1000 plant to 2000 (Inter company STO), then 2000 company will sell that material to customer or delear or etc.
Manufaturing plant and disptach plants are different
How to take utilization in above said scenario.
Regards
sapman man

Hi
we are having two company codes 1000 and 2000,
1000 is having the Manufturing plant- 1000
2000 is having the sales plant - 2000
Both the plant are having the same excise group-10
The company will procure a materials in 1000 plant and CENVAT is credited at 1000 Plant. The 1000 plant never dispatch materials to customers, The company want to take Monthly utilization from 2000 company code and 2000 plant.
The company first make STO from 1000 plant to 2000 (Inter company STO), then 2000 company will sell that material to customer or delear or etc.
Manufaturing plant and disptach plants are different
How to take utilization in above said scenario.
As per above your input would like narrate as under.
As per SAP & Statutory norms Utilization is only happen when you avail credit and availing of credit is only possible when your plant is register with Excise thats only possible when you can declare your plant is in actively invloves in manfacturing activity ( Input and out put material will be differ) then you can register with Excise and get excise register the sam eyou can maintain in J1ID.
Now coming t your case which not possible as plant 2000 becomes Depot and depot scenario you can not utilize as you are not availing any input credit.
Son what you can do is pass the credit to 2000 plant and utilise in 1000 plants which is quite easy
And request you to create two different excise group as you can not assign same excise group to plant and deopt.
Hope this helps you

I have a problem with my Iphone 4s since I did my first update at your Itunes, the bluetooth and the WiFi it is not workinhg anymore. It is sad that companies like apple are not able to support thier sofware and business. I went to a apple store at Sout

I have a problem with my Iphone 4s since I did my first update at your Itunes, the bluetooth and the WiFi it is not workinhg anymore.
It is sad that companies like apple are not able to support thier sofware and business.
I went to a apple store at South Park, Charlotte NC,
and found out the worst customer service (in my case)
They don't have answers and don't understand about "dont let any customer go away sad or mad"
I explain to them that I did everything they said to fix the problem, even to dounload the iOS 6.1.3
that was supposed to fix the problem.
they said fix the problem in other phones but not in mine.
So here I am with no wifi and bluetooth, with apple technicians and experts that don't know what to do with the problem that the sofware they developed cause in my iphone 4s.
and the solution is for me to pay $199.00 US dollars for a problem that I did not cause.
wich means to buy something else from apple to fix a problem that it is not my fault.
Great! what a convenient solution.
I would like to have an answer from you guys and see if someone there have a better answer for me that shows support, values and integrity as a grest company with solutions for your customers.
Dont think that I want a new phone, I want mine fixed if is possible.
Thank you very much and God Bless you!

Apple isnt here. this is a user based forum for technical questions. The solution is to restart, reset, and restore as new which is in the manual after that get it replaced for hard ware failure. if your within your one year warranty its replaced if it is out of the warranty then it is 199$

I have a few hundred duplicates in my iPhoto library, but the file sizes are different. So one is 1.3mb and one is 567kb. I want to delete the smaller ones, but short of comparing each duplicate, is there a way to do this?

I have a few hundred duplicates in my iPhoto library, but the file sizes are different. So one is 1.3mb and one is 567kb. I want to delete the smaller ones, but short of comparing each duplicate, is there a way to do this? I've been looking at Duplicate Annhilator but I don't think it can do it.
Thanks!

I just ran a test with iPhoto Library Manager, Duplicate Annihilator, iPhoto Duplicate Cleaner, Duplifinder and Photodedupo. I imported a folder of 5 photos into a test library 3 times, allowing iPhoto to import duplicates. I then ran the 5 photos thru resizer to reduce their jpeg compression but all other aspects of the file the same.
None of the duplicate removal apps found set that was reduced in the file resizer. That's probably due to the fact that the file creation date was being used as a criteria and the resized photo would have a different file creation date even though the Image Capture date was the same.
They all found the 3 regular duplicates and some of them would mark two and leave the 3rd unmarked. iPhoto Duplicate Cleaner can sort the found duplicates by file size but if the file was edited to get the reduced file size it might not be found as it would have a different file creation/modification date.
iPhoto Library Manage was able to find all duplicates and mark them as such if the file names were the same the the filename option was selected. Otherwise it also missed the modified, resized version. It allowed one to select the one photo to save before going to work on the library.
So if a photo has been reduced in image quality or pixel size it will not be considered a duplicate.
OT

Consolidated companies 1000 and ' ' are different

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for