Actual Cost on Simulation Version

Hello
I am creating simulation version thru CJV1. How do I plan and post actuals on that version ? I don't see that simulation version (proj defn) to do planning or to use it on PO in WBS drop down list.
In short how do I simulation of cost on such proj versions. Once I transfer it to operative proj thru CJV4, I am able to do planning and post actual. What is the right way of using simulation versions?
Thanks
Sarang

Ok got u. But then how do you paln costs on same i.e. commitment or activities labour cost etc
Sarang

Similar Messages

  • Planed costs on Simulation Version

    Where can I see the planed costs on Simulation?
    I have an escenario where the project is created as Simulation, and after this one is evaluated on duration and costs, the user transfer the simulation to an operative project, but I need to see the planed costs.

    Hi ,
    Go to trnsaction CNS41 Structure Overview report
    Press The Push button DB Profile
    Tick on Version data in Origin
    here u can select the simulation versions for which u want to see the Project info with differentiated colors
    by selection of Project planned cost field
    Rgds

  • CJV4, WBS simulation version cost in COSS and COSP by cost element

    Hi PS expert.  (-:
    IN PS When we freeze a simulation version with CJV4,  (operative data to version), sap will create new object number in table VSCAUFV_CN for each network and VSPRPS_CN for each Wbs element related to the simulation Version.
    In our environment, SAP will add record in COSS and COSP for the new object number for Network but NOT FOR THE WBS.
    Is it standard to NOT record the cost in COSS and COSP for the simulation cost of the WBS (against the new object number?)
    That mean we will able to see the simulation cost by cost element for network, but NOT FOR WBS element.
    For the WBS, we only record the cost in RPSCO by cost category.
    Is there a way to active (with an exit ..classu2026bapi) the recording of the cost of the WBS by simulation version in COSS and COSP
    Thanks you very much for your help
    Sophie

    hi sophie,
    create separate network for each wbs in project.  see if this can solve your issue.
    vengaiah chowdary

  • PS (plan vs actual costs) Report

    Hi,
    I have to generate the above report. How can I diffrentiate between Plan cost and actual cost. Is there any business contect report for this ? can anybody throw light on this.
    Regards,
    Bill

    Hi Bill,
               There is no std content for this as far as I know , Not sure if your report is based on cost for a given version then its really a mystery . If you are looking to pull the cost for PS then check the table RPSCO in r3 , this is the PS cost table , and you can differentiate Plan/Actual based on the Field Value type .
    hope this helps ,

  • Error in Distribution of Actual cost in Cost Object Hierarchy

    Hi,
    I am getting an error while doing the Distribution of Actual cost from Cost Object Node to the assigned Order.
    Cost element/origin 630000 could not be distributed
    Message no. KZ468
    Diagnosis
    The cost element/ origin 630000 could not be distributed because there are no target costs for this cost element/origin or for cost element group CO-PC-TOT.
    Procedure
    Check the calculated target costs and cost element group CO-PC-TOT assigned to the target cost version.
    Procedure for System Administration
    Proceed
    Although the Cost element is Present in cost element group CO-PC-TOT.
    One more information, the order  that is assigned in Cost Object Hierarchy is of CO-Product orders.
    I have searched in the forum but I havent got any solution.
    Kindly help.
    regards
    Kami

    Hi,
    Concerning error message KZ 468, it has the following origin: In the  customizing of the cost object category (transaction okz5), check if the 'single object selection' is set to 'Control through variance key'. If you consider the F1-Help for this option you will find the following  explanation:
    if the indicator Control through variance key is turned on, the production order, process order, or product cost collector can only be assigned to the cost object hierarchy if:
    -> The material is assigned to the lowest node of the hierarchy
    -> No variance key is specified in the order
    The important point is, that orders that have a variance key are excluded from the cost distribution.
    In transaction KKF8 you will find that all these orders do indeed have  a variance key. Hence, all of these orders are included, there are no target costs from the orders and the costs cannot be distributed. Thus the error message kz 468.
    Please consider that and check the customizing again.
    Not having target costs in the distribution indicates either a wrong set up of the hierarchy or, more likely, no valid cost estimate for a certain material of a production order or product cost collector could be found.
    Did you check whether for this cost element/origin target costs exist, and also for the cost element group? If not the message KZ468 is correct and probably the cost element group has to be maintained properly.
    The distribution of actual costs calculates target costs on-the-fly and the variance calculation does not have to be carried out before. Quite the opposite than the variance calculation requires the distribution as a preceding step. Furthermore it is not sufficient that one cost element is in a cost element group but the interval where the cost element has been assigned to has to have some target costs. Otherwise this won't work and message KZ468 is issued.
    regards
    Waman

  • Function Module to find Planned Costs and Actual Costs against WBS element

    Dear All,
    We have a requirement where we need to find out the Planned Costs and Actual Costs booked against a WBS element, in a year. The costs can be against all the plan versions or on individual plan version.
    Are there any function modules to retrieve this value?
    Thanks for the help.
    Warm Regards,
    Judith

    Hi,
    The easiest way would be to get the OBJNR for all WBS elements from PRPS and look up RPSCO and summarize for Value type (RPSCO-WRTTP) 1 for planned cost and 4 for Actual cost.
    Please let me know if this helps.
    jibat

  • PLM table for Internal Order budget, Actual Cost and Actual Hrs

    Dear all
    In cProjects version 4.0, we have integration with existing ECC 6.0. We create Internal Order manually and assign it to cProjects.
    One cProject  having one Internal Order.
    Resource Planning part is managed in cProjects while Actual Time keeping(CATS with reference to Internal Order), budgeting of Internal Order, Material and Service Procurement which is done against Internal Order is managed in ECC. ECC and PLM are separate systems.
    We have RFCs established to transfer actual hrs, budget and actual cost data from ECC to PLM.
    Which is the ABAP table in PLM where we get linking of cProject with Internal Order and also actual hrs, budget and actual cost data in PLM system?
    Thanks & Regards
    Ashish

    actual hrs, budget and actual cost data in PLM system?
    Its not there, actual hours can be found in DPR_Task but it needs to be transferred by running a report.
    The planned cost etc is also calculated at runtime and passed on to Costing object in ECC (Int order/PS)
    Actual hours will be in CATSDB in ECC
    needless to say actual cost will also be there in ECC and not in PLM, PLM only displays at runtime based on RFC.
    If you want to try, Break the RFC and try to check the Evaluation..
    Niranjan

  • Decision Pop up while starting actual cost process

    Hi,
    Can anyone help me on this?
    I am getting a Decision Pop up while starting actual cost process.
    Prior Inventory period has not been closed. Cannot proceed.
    By clicking on continue, the accept button became available and I launched the process.
    However, we are uncomfortable with that situation since it looks like that February period is closed for all inventory accounting periods under that LE. It is also the first time that we are getting that pop up decision screen since we are testing under R12. We want to understand the reason for that.
    Note: it is the first time that we were trying to close a period before fully completing it (closing Feb period on Feb 29).
    NOTE: This is in UAT. This does not occur in any other instance (Dev, PPB, CRP).
    We normally did not perform final cost update and the calendar assignments org periods will be always open.
    Let me know if you need any more details.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Kannan Jay

    Thanks for your quick response yesterday!  After chatting with our official IT guy, He lined some things out for me.  We are using SQL 2005.  We discussed working up a program to add our data directly, which is an option.  It will take some learning on my part, and I am willing to do it. 
    It would be optimal, in my mind, to use our web version in conjunction with Labview.  But the more experienced person might know better.
    When I call up our webpage on the front panel, I am able to navigate it by clicking around just like a normal browser.  Using this method, the refresh issue I mentioned in my original post is not a problem.  It refreshes with no pop-up.  BUT I lose the capability to place my data into the fields.  I am assuming the reference at the property node before the data placement is incorrect. (pictured below)
    Is there a way to physically navigate a webpage and then use Labview to find the reference of whatever page I am currently on in order to place my data?  This might be the route I need to go.

  • Actual costs for laboratory exams / Material Ledger

    Hi Experts
    I have a doubt for actual cost scenario for laboratory industry.
    My  background is for product cost for consumer goods, specially food companies, so this is a new segment for me.
    This laboratory has baseline version, no service/production order, it means all material consumption goes to cost center and they use activities to send costs from cost center to cost center.
    They have BOM for all exams (finished product). They only run CK40N for standard costs but they don't have actual cost (material ledger - CKMLCP) implemented.
    This is the issue: they want actual cost for every exam in the way we have for consumer goods industry.
    So they can analyse profitability for product (exam) x customers.
    I wounder if the same industry actual cost scenario can be applied to this business segment or if there is a special SAP solution for this segment.
    The main issue is the stock, there is no stock, it´s service. I believe we could change the account in BSX key (OBYC) for some P&L accounts but I´d like your opinion/experience.
    I hope you help me to  clarify these doubts
    Thanks in advance.

    Dear Rupesh,
    I don't think so there will be any std.report in PS module to show plan vs actual cost of material component.
    For looking plan vs actual cost in PS having many std reports but they don't show for material component.
    I think for this you need to develop a Z report which will show Plan vs Actual cost of material component.
    In CN52N report (Component overview report) you can add two fields one is for plan cost & other for actual cost.This can be one of possibilty you can try.Otherwise develop a new Z report for the same.
    For this you need to take yr abaper's help.
    Regard's
    Sandeep

  • Actual Cost Component Split for cross company code transfers.

    Hi,
    My issue is as follows.
    Production process spans across 2 company codes.
    Goods are produced in production company code, transferred (via stock transport order) to marketing company code and sold to customers from marketing company code.
    Stock transport order follows sales scenario i.e.. marketing company code creates purchase order for goods from production company code and production company code bills marketing for the goods.
    Actual costing / Material ledger is implemented in both company codes.
    We would like to roll-up (transfer) actual cost component split from production company code to marketing company (in a similar way as in product cost planning in cross-company scenario).
    However, due to the fact that the transfer between the companies is in fact a "sales" the goods in marketing company code are seen as externally purchased and the only cost component we can create is based on PO conditions. But we want to get the info about production cost component split.
    Once again this is for ACTUAL cost component split.
    I would be grateful for any ideas.
    Thanks,
    Szymon

    Hi Udo / Szymon.
    I have a question about this issue.
    In the sap help  about multiple valuations / group costing:
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/7e/cb848443a311d189ee0000e81ddfac/content.htm
    Its not clear if this can roll up the Actual CCS? or what it do? My question is because i read the documentation of  bussiness function: LOG_MM_SIT,and also the book *Actual Costing with The SAP Material Ledger*
    states that we can handle the rollup of actual cost component split inter-company only with this BF active.
    Could you clarify about this?
    thanks!!
    Arturo.
    Group Valuation
    Goods movements between affiliated companies not involving intercompany profits are processed using the group view. This view determines the actual cost of goods manufactured for the group, and does not include any intercompany profits. You can, however, display internal profits as delta profits in the legal and/or profit center views.
    When you define cost components, you can specify that internal profits between company codes and/or profit centers are shown in detail in the cost component split. You activate these delta profits for the group valuation in the attributes of the cost components.
    For each cost component structure, there can only be one cost component under which the delta profit is shown. This means that neither the legal view nor the profit center view can have more than one cost component for the delta profit.
    To cost multiple values, you define a costing type for each valuation approach in Customizing for Product Cost Planning. You use the costing type to specify which valuation approach you require. You define each costing type in a new costing variant and carry out a cost estimate with this costing variant.
    Group Costing and Multiple Valuation Approaches
    In-Depth Detail of the Value-Added Chain: Partner Cost Component Split
    You can display in detail the costs of materials and services of every company department in the value-added chain for every stage of the production process. The partner can be traced for every material used. To do this, you define a partner version, which enables the value-added portions of each manufacturing level to be displayed in detail. For further information about this, see Partners and Direct Partners.
    The group cost component split can be displayed according to your partner definition. You can display the cost structures of the partners hierarchically according to your requirements, such as the company code segments on the highest level and the plant or profit center segments underneath.
    To display partner cost component splits, define a partner version in Customizing and enter it in the costing type.

  • Actual Cost Process - ORA-00001

    Hi
    Is the anyone knows this error ORA-00001: Unique constraint (GMF.CM-CMPT_DTL_PK) violated.
    **** sy_etrap - FATAL_ERROR ****%N%NFunction: gmfaput_cm_cmpt_dtl_insert%N%NStatement: insert from cm_cmpt_dtl_raw%N%NError: ORA-00001: unique constraint (GMF.CM_CMPT_DTL_PK) violated
    Thanks

    Hi;
    What is EBS version?
    Please check below notes which could be helpful for your issue
    Actual Cost process Error ORA-00001: Unique Constraint (GMF.CM_CMPT_DTL_U1) Violated [ID 358603.1]
    Autoinvoice Error: ORA-00001: Unique Constraint [ID 1219263.1]
    OERR: ORA 1 unique constraint violated [ID 18222.1]
    Regard
    Helios

  • Sales pricing from Project Simulation Version

    hi.
    Has anybody created sales pricing for the project using transaction DP 82? It does not create the sales pricing for the simulation version, even though I have provided the version key.
    The status of the simulation version of the project is CRTD. I am using the network cost planning in the simulation version of the project. Am I missing something here? I am hoping to get an answer from this community. Thanks for your help in advance.
    Regards
    Mey

    Hi
    The following are the prerequisites for the sucessful fuctioning of sales pricing for simulation versions of the project.
    1. A dynamic item processor profile (DIP profile) must have been maintained in the customer inquiry.and must be Customized for Project System.
    2.The same DIP profile must have been entered on the Sales B tab page of the item detail view in the SD order.
    3. A customer inquiry with at least one item that has to be maintained and assigned to a billing element must exist. The system determines the SD data for sales pricing from this inquiry item.
    4.You have planned costs (in concordance with cost elements) for your project version.
    If these prerequisites are met, i think it will work
    Reward if helpful
    Regards
    Murali

  • Manual Actual prices for 2 versions

    Dear Experts
    i need to put rates for same activity type for two different version in KBK6
    our secnario is :
    we activated business function FIN_CO_COGM and created 2nd version with valuation view 5 COGM , our problem we have all rate for the Local version and the 2nd version are the same except for Depreciation and profit share .
    so we need to put two different rate for these Dep. and profit share
    we implemented note 1695638 - COGM: manual actual price but after trying to run program COGM_ADD_FUNC in order to activate indicator P_COGM
    the system issue message this program does not exist .
    we need to know :-
    1- how to put 2 rates for 1 activity type for 2 version (actual not plan)
    Regards
    Mona Sultan

    Dear Szymon
    we are still in the middle of the process of having 2 valuation using 2 version local & IFRS due to depreciation amount is different between the two valuations
    so the data is correct and the difference is posted to the cost center , with secondary cost element
    when allocating the actual cost to process orders it does not take in to account the other amount for the IFRS , and it only settle the local amount with version (0)
    even after running CKMLCP and CKMLCOAVR the differnce stays on the IFRS Version and does not absorb in to the materials
    Regards
    Mona

  • How to compare the simulation version

    Dear Experts,
    For Operative Projects we can create Simulation Versions (CJV1 / CJV4) & Project Version (CN72).
    We can compare different Project Versions with Operative Project (S_ALR_87013539 / 38).
    Similarly can we compare Simulation version with Operative Project?
    OR can we see plan cost report for simulation version?
    Please guide.
    Rajesh

    Hi,
    Simulation versions are not meant for comparison purpose. You can use Project versions for that, which are snapshots of project at that point of time.
    Simulation versions can be used to analyse 'what-if' conditions and for quotation ie pre-order analysis. Before receipt of sales order, you can create simulation project and do cost planning for quotation purpose. After receipt of sales order, this project can be made operative. In case of loss of project, you can delete simulation.
    Another case can be during execution you want to check "what happens if" kind of conditions. you can transfer operative project to simulation version, simulate reqd condition. If results are desirable, you can copy the simulation version onto current project or alternatively delete simulation.
    Regards

  • Simulation version WBS element

    Good morning,
    We need to load for the 0WBS element,  the simulation version (PS
    version , not CO version).
    Could you help me?
    Thank you

    Hi,
    check out this sap help...
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/b4/60073c0057f057e10000000a114084/frameset.htm
    CJ40 - Project Cost Planning By project and wbs

Maybe you are looking for