BI-IP - Planning Buffer issue

Hi Experts,
In our current BI-IP project, there is a requirement to jump from an input ready query, located in web template u201CAu201D, to another web template u201CBu201D, which contains one display only query and a couple of planning functions.
To do this, we are using the standard RRI feature, since the users want to use the mouse right button to select one specific cell in the input ready query as the start point of the jump.
Everything works just fine, except when the user changes the plan values in the origin query and jumps to the destination without first saving the data. In this case, the values are not refreshed in the destination query in web template u201CBu201D. This situation really represents an issue, because this kind of navigation is supposed to occurs frequently, and the users donu2019t want to save the data every time they jump to the second web template.
As a workaround, we tried to use the class CL_RSPLFA_PLAN_BUFFER to read the planning buffer in the target web template, but it does not work, since the planning buffer delta can only be accessed by queries and planning functions in the context of the same application, in our case the web template u201CAu201D, from where we jumped.
We understand that this situation represents a limitation of the standard BI-IP planning buffer concept, so we would like to hear from you suggestions on how to workaround this issue.
Any input will be highly appreciated.
Thanks in advance,
JSalva.

Hi Matthias, thanks for your reply.
Yes, we are almost sure that, so far, is not yet possible to recover, from outside, changed data in the context of a particular planning session buffer, at least using standard methods.
What we are looking for at this moment is a workaround for the jump using the context menu. Since integrate the both web templates in only one is not really a solution, according to user needs and layouts defined in the Business Blueprint, we have to find a way to implement, for example, a save function before the jump. However, it's a little bit tricky, because we are using a standard query jump (RRI), so itu2019s impossible to use any kind of command with that.
Can anyone provide a script code example on how to implement an additional entry in the context menu that: 1) saves the data in the origin application (web template u201CAu201D) before the jump; 2) jumps into the destination (web template u201CBu201D)?
Best regards,
JSalva.

Similar Messages

I have an apple id for my ipod touch at home. My company is planning to issuing Ipads. Should I use the same apple id on the ipad for those apps I purchase and would like to purchase and use on my work ipad?

I have an apple id for my ipod touch at home. My company is planning to issuing Ipads. Should I use the same apple id on the ipad for those apps I purchase and would like to use on my work ipad?

Yes, otherwise you will have to pay for those apps again. If an app is purchased by one Apple ID, he/she will be able to redownload it again for no cost (note: this does apply to songs, but NOT to movies).

New planned goods issue date during delivery creation due to changed route

Hello All,
I have defined 2 routes with different values for transit time and transporation lead times. I have configured routes such that in order creation - route A is determined and while delivery creation due to weight group - delivery B is determined.
Now for Route A i have maintained transit time of 3 days and Transportation lead time of 4 days and for Route B it is 1 day each.
Delivery scheduling is active for the order type.
Now when i create the order with a delivery date of say 05/24/2010 then (route A with transit time of 3 days) is determined and the planned goods issue date of 05/21/2010 is in the order.
Now while creating delivery (Route B which has transit time 1 day) is determined due to the weight group. But the planned goods issue date is still the same 05/21/2010 as in order.
I am assuming that since the route B has a route of 1 day so the planned goods issue date should be re-determined to 05/23/2010? IS there no scheduling done during delivery creation even though route and subsequently transit time has changed?
Please let me know the answer to this...
Thanks
Shobhit

Hi ,
You can use TA - MASS . Enter object type - BUS2032(for sales orders) on initial screen and select sales item data.
Next screen enter selection fields like sales order no and items. After giving order no and item range , execute and enter all new values for any item data fields. After pressing button "carry out mass change", don't forget to press save button.

Need to Post Components in Production Order in MB1A through BAPI as Planned Good Issue

Hi ,
I have created a Program to upload data s for MB1A through BDC , it works fine, but for huge data s it takes more time. alternatively created one more Program which updates through BAPI Function Module "BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE". It works fine , but one issue noted, after posting through Function Module , components are posted as Unplanned Goods Issue.   I need to post the components as " Planned Goods Issue" instead of "Unplanned Goods Issue " . This can viewed through Tcode : C003
Below are the inputs passed for BAPI Function Moduel
**&------Header Contents of bapi Upload-------------------&*
header-pstng_date = sy-datum.                                              " Posting date
header-doc_date    = sy-datum.                                             " Document Date
header-header_txt = '000001002280'.                                     " Header text
header-pr_uname   = sy-uname.                                            " User Name
header-ref_doc_no = '000001002280'.                                    " Header Ref. Doc. No.
CONCATENATE sy-uname sy-uzeit c_method INTO header-ref_doc_no_long SEPARATED BY '-'. " Refer Text
*Item Data
wa_item-material   = '000000000010000800'.                             "Material
wa_item-plant      = '3910'.                                              "Plant
wa_item-stge_loc   = 'WIP'.                                            "Storage Location
wa_item-move_type = '261'.                                            "Movement Type
wa_item-entry_qnt = '1'.                                                  "Quantity
wa_item-entry_uom = 'PC'.                                              "Unit
*wa_item-res_item = 1.                                                  "Reservation Item
*wa_item-reserv_no =                                                      " Reservation Number
wa_item-batch      = '0000011027'.                                    "Batch No
*wa_item-mvt_ind   = 'F'.                                                  "Movement Indicator
*wa_item-stck_type = 'F'.                                                 "Stock Type
wa_item-orderid    = '000001002260'.                                 "Order ID
wa_item-prod_date = SY-DATUM.
*wa_item-GL_Account = '610000'.                                     "GL Account
*TRANSLATE wa_item-batch TO UPPER CASE.
*APPEND wa_item TO it_item.
c_code = '03'.
CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE'
EXPORTING
goodsmvt_header       = header
goodsmvt_code         = c_code
TABLES
goodsmvt_item         = it_item
goodsmvt_serialnumber = it_sno
return                = return.
CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT'
EXPORTING
      wait = 'X'.
    commit work and wait.
Even i tried to pass "Movement Indicator , GL Account etc" , Still not able to fix the issue. Can anyone suggest how to post the Production Order components as "Planned Goods Issue". I am not sure any other values to be password.
BR,
Murali

I have made something like your :
* Alimtentation de la BAPI de mouvement de stock MM.
move : sy-datum        to ls_header-pstng_date ,
        sy-datum        to ls_header-doc_date ,
* Indique le code mouvement
        '03'            to lw_code.      " 03 normalement, mais je veux que ca plante
loop at lt_ltap
      into ls_ltap.
   move : ls_ltap-matnr   to ls_item-material ,
          ls_ltap-werks   to ls_item-plant ,
          ls_ltap-lgort   to ls_item-stge_loc ,
          '261'           to ls_item-move_type ,
          ls_ltap-vsolm   to ls_item-entry_qnt ,
          ls_ltap-meins   to ls_item-entry_uom ,
          i_ltak_vb-benum to ls_item-orderid ,
          i_ltak_vb-rsnum to ls_item-reserv_no ,
          ls_ltap-rspos   to ls_item-res_item ,
          ls_ltap-rsart   to ls_item-res_type.
   append ls_item to lt_item.
   clear ls_item.
endloop.
I have to put the reservation number to have it works.
Fred

Detecting the SAVE of the data to the planning buffer

Hi,
When the user has saved the planning buffer data after executing the planning function that has the Exit FM, how can I detect that the data from the planning buffer has been saved from my Exit FM?
Is there a way to detect that he user has clicked on the SAVE button to save the data in the planning buffer?
Thanks,
RT

Hi Rob,
A non standard functionality may be to create a custom FM that is called in the exit. Then, you will notice the save inside the custom FM and do what you want and then call the SAP Standard FM to save data.
Hope it helps.
Regards,
Diego Lombardini

Buffer issue

Hello guys,
I am facing issue becuase of the buffer very frequently.
The agent assignment fails because of this. As soon as I refresh the buffer, it works fine.
Is there a permanent solution for this?
We are in the testing phase in the Quality system. There were no transports which went through for workflow in the past few days. But still the buffer issue came up. NO change was done to the Org.structure also recently.
Can anyone explain and provide the solution?
Thanks,
Ram.

Hello,
Could you answer my questions:
1. Where is the user reading his emails, in SBWP? Or UWL?
2. When you do the buffer refresh, do the existing workflow instances start sending workitems again or do only new workflows send workitems?
If the answer to 2. is existing workflow instances, then what is happening with these workflows in the meantime? Does the workflow log show that it has reached the appropriate step and it has the correct agents, but the users just can't see it in their inboxes?
Doing SWU_OBUF is not a problem in production, it causes a small performance dip (as far as I understand it) but it's certainly not something you want to be doing all the time.
When this is resolved please be sure to post the solution here.
regards
Rick Bakker
Hanabi Technology

Buffer Issue in CRM2007 Interaction Center

Hi Experts,
We are facing one buffer issue in IC and the detailed process is:-
1) We open any account in IC and based on that account we have an Alert Ex:- Alert1.
2) Now we end the interaction and leave the IC window open.
3) Now we open a new WebClient session and change the alert message of the same BP to Alert2.
4) Now when we confirm the same BP again in the opened window of IC it still displays us the old Alert1
This problem is because the changes that we have done using WebClient is not available in IC and IC is reading the data from old buffer.
Any inputs or help will be highly appreciated.
Thanks & Regards
Pulkit

Do you mean the u201CDial Padu201D button?? How should it work? Does it take the phone number of the customer confirmed in the IC?
In our case, when we click on this button, we have the option of writing a phone number and click later on Select. Does the u201CSelectu201D button launch the outgoing call??
In previous versions, we had the option (In CIC0) to select the Customer or the Contact Person and click on the Call button, action that automatically took the phone number and prepared the call with this number? Is it able to reproduce the same behaviour in CRM 2007??
Thanks in advance.
Best regards.

Actual goods issue date required to be equal to planned goods issue date

Hi All,
Can anybody tell me on what basis does the actual goods issue date get determined and what needs to be done if we want to restrict the actuall goods issue date to be equal to the planned goods issue date?
Avinash

Avinash,
Can anybody tell me on what basis does the actual goods issue date get determined
???? It is the date that the goods are actually issued from stock, e.g. whatever the date was when the delivery was actually issued, that is the date that is normally written to this field in the delivery.
what needs to be done if we want to restrict the actual goods issue date to be equal to the planned goods issue date
That's a pretty restrictive criteria. Basically, you are telling the warehouse that they are not able to issue the goods early or late. In companies I have seen, that would constitute a lot of deliveries. Hope your customers don't need the parts....
Anyhow, the restriction would have to be against the goods issue transactions being used by the warehouse. I don't believe there is any standard configuration that creates such a restriction, so it would require custom development. If you pursue this restriction, make sure you leave yourself some kind of override.
In many companies, this problem is handled through policy and procedure. Warehouse manager simply creates a policy about early and late goods issues. The system will track discrepancies in the case the policy is not followed.
Best Regards,
DB49

Planning Good Issue date and loading date

Hi All,
How I can get the planning Good issue date? I found that the loading date is the same as the planned Good issue date, what's the loading time?
As what I understanding, loading date + loading time = Good issue date, But I am not sure how to calculate the planned Good issue date.
thanks,

Hello Friend,
It is determined in Shipping Point configuration.The path is as follows SPRO--> Enterprise Structure >Definition>Logistics Execution-->Define, copy, delete, check shipping point and go in detail the concerned shipping point.

WCS Map planning mode issue

WCS Map planning mode issue:
Hi ,
we try to set AP planing mode in WCS with actual obastacle rail other editing featue in planing mode but when we genarate planning we can't get edit map .
how can we solve this issue .
thanks and regards
Robin

What browser are you using? There are some compatibilty issues with some browsers like google chrome. I use chrome to view WCS, but firefox to manage/plan mapping.

ACE: buffer issue?

Hi all,
I implemented an ACE for "ACCOUNTCRM" and event background job is triggered to update the trace table whenever an account is created. However, I notice that the results return is incorrect due to some buffer issue which i suspect.
My scenario is agent in group A is only allowed to see accounts in group A (based on certain criteria). If the agent created an account in WebUI which does not meet the ACE rule, this new account should not appear in all account searching result list. But in my implementation, the new account is shown in the result list and which is wrong.
I tried to trace using the ACE simulator and I got correct result list. And If I launch a webUI to do the account creation, then log off or using another session to do searching, correct result list is displayed. However, if I create the account, followed by searching for the account at the same WebUI session, then the result list is wrong.
Anyone encountered such problem?
cheers,
ginnie

solved by adding ACE general parameter.
cheers,
ginnie

Problem with playback distortion. Possible latency buffer issue?

I have noticed a few other posts in the same vain as this but with no clear answers so here is my take on the problem:
I am experiencing a distorted slowed down playback through logic pro 8 only occasionally which can only be fixed wit a full system restart. It sounds very much like a latency/buffer issue but to be honest I am not too great at fixing this myself. I have tried to change the buffer size to no avail. Recording seems to be fine mostly but it is just on playback. Although today i did experience the same sound issues when recording.
I am using a brand new macbook 2.4 ghz with a behringer xenix 1622 mixing desk and a usb audio device. I have only just switched to a mac and have recorded before on my pc with the same desk and interface for over 2 years without a problem, so I am positive it is not the external hardware that is at fault.
I am getting exactly the same problem when I use Garageband.
Is it just the apple products which do this?
Is this a common problem with an easy fix?
I just dont know to be honest with you, i dont pretend to be an expert in the field, it is infuriating.
Is there a problem with my machine? If so I can change it no problem.
Please if anyone knows how I can sort this please let me know.
I am gutted because I bought a mac thinking they were designed for music production, i dont want a pc again!
Thanks.

Can you be more specific on your usb device; Make & model... USB2? Visit the manufacturer's website, check compatibility & make sure you've got the latest driver. If you haven't already, run "Software Update" (under the Apple logo in the top left of your screen) & download the updates... this will take a while, so go & get yourself a coffee! Make sure you turn Airport off when you want to use Logic.
If you're still having prob's check out this link;
http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=304970
It's written for Logic 7, but most of it's in the same place.
Hope this helps.
Cheers...

Planning Buffer

Hello Experts,
Do any of you know how to view the planning buffer in BI 7.0? Or, how can you look at statistics on how much is used and also how do you set how much is available in the system?
Thanks
Tim

Hi,
I don't have experience with BPS, but for IP I just received an answer from SAP:
"The Deltabuffer is stored on the Abap side as an internal table in the
roll area and is read with classes."
This means that the buffer is located in the RAM memory and is emptied when you close your workbook (so not stored in a table). However with certain classes during your session you can read in the buffer. Try the first one of the following classes:
<b>CL_RSPLFA_PLAN_BUFFER          Read Plan Buffer ***</b>
CL_RSPLS_DELTA_BUFFER          Delta Buffer
CL_RSPLS_DELTA_BUFFER_A        Delta Buffer for an Aggregation Level
CL_RSPLS_DELTA_BUFFER_AM       Virtual Delta Buffer for (Multi-)
AGGRLEVEL
CL_RSPLS_DELTA_BUFFER_B        Concrete BASIC Delta Buffer
CL_RSPLS_PLAN_BUFFER           Plan Buffer
grtz
D

Planning Units issues in Hyperion Planning 11.1.2

Hi, experts.
I'm new in HP, so needed some help with misunderstanding of how PU&proccess management normally works.
More detailed I interested at the area of Validation rules.
I have to give an example of few problems I met during my try to implement this functionality.
Firstly, it's a newest version of EPM 11.1.2 installed and supported by the vendor's professionals
I have Planning app deployed in EPMA with 14 dims. I didn't drop any standard planning dimensions, all are present
There is the only PU hierarchy to test how approvals works. It has 3 entities and 12 elements of additional dimension - functional group. Hence, there are 36 level zero members in PU hierarchy.
Form1 consists of 36 rows according to PUH, columns are Period (17) and one custom dim for the target, plan values, it's diff etc. Validation rule VR1 on Form1 check negative values of target minus plan (I plan expences) VR1 has "No Promote" flag. Then I start 2 level0 planning units (entity1-FuncGroup1 and entity1-FuncGroup2). I try to promote these PU1&PU2. It's Ok only if negative exists I get an data error links drilling down into my form1. So user can see the error and all happy.
Problem actually with form2 that has Region Dim in page. Entity,Functional Group,Account in rows and Plan value,Year,Period in columns. It also has VR2 for testing plan values greater than 1000 with No Promote option. Another VR3 checks values greater than 100 to add new approver, reviewer (no matter) to the approvals process management.
Both VR2 and VR3 don't work accurately. They fired only for the first member in page (Region), hence any data validation for other regions except first skipped. In addition VR3 when triggered for Region1 always circles (between new and previous approver). It meens there is no way to finish this proccess using the promote option. Anyway you can approve PU, but all steps after current Aprover will be skipped in promotional path.
Maybe I can't work with Proccess managment in the right way? So could anybody give me an idea what's wrong. I've spent much time googling any issues like me have
Many thanks in advance,
Vladimir

Hi, Theresia
Yes you're absolutely right, I created VR from the manage form's menu. So I use standard HP 11.1.2 functionality. I've seen it in new features while read Oracle documentation. Also with testing of approvals in Proccess managment I use distinct colours for negatives and diff values (greater 1000 and 100 in my example). Colours work fine, but i can't say it about aprovals :). And all these examples of using planning form VR's i've taken from oracle administrators&user guiide and from presentations of EPM 11.1.2
In addition I've started work with Hyperion products 2-3 month ago. Hence I have to read a lot of information because my previous experience was OLTP, RDBMS not OLAP.
As a first step i wanna know all standard possibilities of product i use. And also best practice and some often used technics. Many thanks for your idea with Smart list and BR i'll try it (though i use EMPA and Calc Manager rules). I know that soon I have to use Java API's, so I might read and learn Java to write the simplest code first. But for me it's too much info i have to load into my brain in such short period :)
As a resume, my opinion it's a bug of new features EPM 11.1.2. But maybe I'm wrong cause none has said the same
Anyway thanks, Theresia, for your help. If you know or will some new additional info i'll say you thanks again
Best regards,
Vladimir

Actual Goods Issue date and Planned Goods Issue date

Dear All
we are loading the january,08 sales invoice from the legacy system to SAP system through BDC program.
for this at the time of PGI we are using Actual GI date as month of January, 08 and keeping planned GI date as the system date and at the time of creating sales order, delivery, we are not changing the material available date, loading date, delivery date, at the item level and system taking automatically based on the current date
when doing PGI system accepting and creating PGI document and billing also creating based on this delivery.
But dose it give problem in Inventory managements and FI in future, then what would be the right procedure to uploading the back dated invoices in the system.
Please give me solution for this issue, or what we are doing is the right procedure.
Thanks In advance

For those who might come across this note, the design issue was solved by incorporating Rule Groups.
Problem:
Need to have 2 different Date references for 0calday, based on the key figures. For example for Sales key figure date it would reference to Actual GI Date. But, for Intake key figure I needed the date reference to be Planned GI date.
Solution-- applied to the transfer rules of the desired cube:
1. In the starndard rule group delete the transfer rule for the appropriate key figures. in this case (sales key figure)
2. In the same rule group map all time characteristics from the cube to Planned GI date from DSO
3. Create a new rule group in the transfer rule between the DSO and the Info Cube
4. In the new rule group, create a new rule for the appropriate key figure i.e. sales
5. In the new rule group, Map the date/week/month/fiscal period to Actual GI date
6. save/activate
This solution eliminates the need for changing the data model, which makes everything almost transparent to the report users.
Hope this helps someone.
Edited by: Babak Shafiei on Dec 12, 2008 5:23 PM
Edited by: Babak Shafiei on Dec 12, 2008 5:24 PM

BI-IP - Planning Buffer issue

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for