BOM- Actual Additional Cost

Hi Experts,
In production order :status - released : Summary Tab : actual additional cost field the additional cost is not shown. .
Looking into the Journal entries created from that transaction I can't find any entry generated out of that service or labor item. But the Unit price for that item is same as that shown in the field Product price of the BOM window.
Plz help
Regards
Aniruddha

Hi Experts,
I have similar problem. We have created 7 Labor type item for 7 BOM since we have different rate for each BOM item.
I already check the following,
Valuation Method = Standard
Item cost is not null we encoded the rate already
GL method is set by item group
WIP inventories and WIP variance is already set.
Issuance Method is Back Flush
My problem is 2 of of 7 BOM item has no additional cost n the journal entry (zero amount)when we received FG quantity . I already compare the master data , all set up is the same except for item cost which has different rate.
Please help ASAP

Similar Messages

Use of template using CPT1 for charging an additional cost to the product

Hello,
I'm trying to charge an additional cost burden to the cost of my product for every base unit produced. (cost estimate)
I have created a template using transaction CPT1 with sender as Cost Center / Activity Type in environment 001
The activity type is measured in EA (Eaches) while we make our product in boxes (Product base unit of measure is 'Boxes') with say 20 Eaches going into a Box
I have maintained an activity price using transaction KP26 at say $0.55 per Each
I have assigned this template to my costing sheet , valuation area and overhead key using transaction KTPF
When I now cost the material for costing lot size of a 1000 boxes, it still charges the product with the activity price per Each ($0.55) instead of multiplying $0.55*20*1000 = $11,000 for a 1000 boxes
The formula I have chosen in the template against 'Plan quantity ' is in the attachment enclosed:
I need help with doing the right thing within the template to make it give a cost burden of $11000 for every 1000 boxes costed (costing lot size)

Didn't realize that you have to use transaction CPTD to charge template overhead to production orders. That's why it was not working. Now it is posting by reading the confirmed yield. But it is still not converting eaches to boxes using the conversion factor in the material master.
The formula I'm currently using in the template for actual quantity is as under:
OrderYieldConfirmed / AltQtyFactorFromMaterial( AlternativeQuantityUnit
= 'BX', Material = OrderMaterialNumber )
Please tell me what I need to do to the above formula to make it convert boxes to eaches using conversion factor in the material master?
A similar formula has worked beautifully for 'cost estimate'
OrderTotalQuantity / AltQtyFactorFromMaterial( AlternativeQuantityUnit =
'BX', Material = OrderMaterialNumber )

Additional cost for finished goods

Hi all,
Here we are following fifo method valuation. we are using SAP B1 2007B PL 04.
I have a doubt how do we account the additional cost like Rent, Electricity etc.
and What G/L Account need to specify at determination level. Here we are determing G/L account with account groups.
I have a document for that but that doesnt give me clear picture of additional cost and
G/L accounts.
Kindly explain me in details with respectives to G/L Accounts
Regards
Shashi

Hi Shashi,
static costs should be included in a BOM as standard cost items. This will add to the item cost of the finished product.
Have a look at our Wiki here (Expert on Phone Newsletter April 2008):
[How to include labour cost in a BOM.|https://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/B1/Howtoincludelabourcostina+BOM.]
You can substitute other costs for 'labour'.
All the best,
Kerstin

Additive Cost and Variance Calcultion

We started using Tcode CK74N to enter additive costs for certian materials. I did the configuration needed in the costing variant and added a cost element for additive costs in the cost component structure.
Everything is working fine, when we run CK11n for a material that already have an additive cost estimate, the additive costs are being picked up and included in the cost estimate. if we mark and release the cost estimate the additive costs are being reflected in the new standard, so far so good.
My question is around the variance postings that happen once we enter a production order and settle the variance at period end.
lets look at this example
Assume the following:
Material X current standard = $100
Order X quantity produced =10 cases
Material X NEW standard after negative additive cost =$80
Scenario 1 (no additive costs) the total debits (Actual postings form material consumption and activity confirmation) to a the order = $900
The total credit was $1000 (standard*quantity produced) , a $100 in variance will occur, and the posting at settlement will be to Debit the price difference account and to credit the cost of sales account for $100. This is the normal case
Scenario 2 : We included a -$200 of additive costs for that material in the standard (new Standard is 80) , the credit to the order will be $800 instead of $1000 , which will make the variance -$200 and the posting currently is to DR cost of sales and credit price difference account for $200
The business and Based on scenario 2 wants to automatically generate a posting to the ACTUAL side of the production order equivalent to the additional variance caused by additive costs? which will put the variance back at 100.
They would like to see a credit to the cost element used in the cost component structure to book additive costs. and the reminder of the variance 100 in our example should continue to be booked to the same price different account .
If this is possible and right to do? what account should be used to offset this credit that being proposed to the additive cost element ? Because I assume that a new FI document should be created to record the credit?
Thanks for your help

Hey,
It depends a little upon the settlement rule of your process/production order.
If you are settling to the material (MAT), the price difference will only be accounted for with one line, without separation between difference coming from additive costs and other differences.
If you are settling not via within CO, you maybe have the possibility the way you settle, but I can not see how you can use such a logic in a settlement process.
What I would do, is to create a custom reposting program, which reposts the additive cost difference separately, after which the normal settlement can take care of the remaining difference.
Regards,
Koen

Additive cost in Std Cost estimate

Hi
I have a requirement to add extra cost in a material cost estimate for certain plants. Because of this I have two costing variants in our case. One is without this extra cost and another with extra cost. This cost is actually freight cost for certain materials.
For this purpose I am planning to use additive cost. I have created one item in the cost component structure and assigned the cost element for this additive cost.
I think that is all I require with regard to additive cost. Now when I try to enter additive cost, system showing some screen showing resources and all. I am not able to understand how can I enter it as a resource ?

Hi Nikita
I wont recommend allocation from cost center to prod orders....
You will have a toughtime entering the SKFs for the prod orders... You would agree that you would need tracing factor in the allocation cycle... which would be SKF... You need to identify the prod orders processed during the month, then enter SKF for them and then execute allocation cycle
Just think about it... May be you would realize the complicacy of it... I would suggest to use a costing sheet or a template allocation.. I dont know how the later works, I am nt an expert at it
Regards
Ajay M

Additive costs and LSMW

Hi ,
I have LSMW for Additive cost upload, but unfortunately we have additive cost for all materilas valid up to 9999 year so when ever we use LSMW for upload we need to hit (as it gives that screen showing previous additive cost estimate as it over laps) ENTER for so many times until we finish all materilas, so
can any one please tell me how to delete all additive costs which is maintainted till 9999 , so that we don't get any messages during LSMW upload?
Paartha

Suraj,
Don't mind As both my issues are inte-rrelated I am dragging our conversaton, I saw that Field in KEKO-KKZMA, but it is Just a indicator that says this product is having some Additive costs, But not the Dollar amount,
S_ALR_87099930 the regular cost estimates report from the Field selection I can Have Additive costs but even this shows Blank, i really wonder "where can I see the actual dollar amount" or any Document that saves the data, Just Like a price change Document, as you said you guys developed the Z report (to be frank I couldn't do this in My last Project, Now I got the same requirement here with new Client) , If you can let me know the main Tables you (MARA, MARC, MBEW, KEKO, KEPH) you took as base,?
and where can I see actaul dollar amount, even in CK76N It won't show "the dolalr amount" for materials it Just Lists all materilas from where you need to Click and go in side to see the dollar amount,
If you want you can reply to below thread I will close this Thread,
Additive costs :Report
Regards
Paartha

Adding additional costs to Material with price control "V"

Good Morning Gurus
We want to add some additional cost to materials. How to do this ?
These materials are valuated at MAP.
Actually there are some delivery costs which were not inventorised correctly to the materials. The materials are undervaluated, we want to add this additional cost to the materials. We donot want to hit the price control account.
Is there any other way ??
Thanks
Regards

Hi,
You can alter the Costing variant and valuation variant according to your scenario. Check the costing variant in OKKN and valuation variant OKK4. You will find the indicator for additive cost there.
Regards,
Jigar

Additive cost not seen in production order and while settling hits PRD

I am using additive costs for my product costing via CK74n.
Cost estimate looks good since I have the valuation variants setup to include additive costs.
But when I see the production order that is being created, all others costs are being considered except additive costs. They are recognized but not as a line item instead as a variance. When I settle the order the costs actually hit price difference account and not even the GL account that I had assigned for the additive cost. SAP did not consider the cost as variance even if it was showing up as variance initially. This as I understood is partly because of the settlement rule that I have in place which tells SAP to go and settle on the material (which is standard SAP to do since I want all the costs from the production order to settle on the eventual material going into stock) so SAP went on to settling on the material. Since the material is set as standard price the variance is being booked as a price difference entry.
Ideally I would have expected the additive cost getting debited to the order and credited to the gl account that I assigned for the additive cost. The eventual cost (incl. additive cost) should hit the inventory.
Am I missing a step?

Hi Sapluver,
Appreciate your prompt response..Please see my response in italics
Few queries related to your post.
1. So your standard cost got two part, one with quantity structure ( materials, labor, OSC etc) which the system cost automatically and one manual part, which is your additive cost. While costing system picks up this manual part from CK74N.
I hope this part you got correct. Yes, the cost estimate is reading from both the qty structure and the additive costs and the cost roll-up is coming up correctly
2. Now in actual cost controlling, i think System is not sure how to valuate your additive cost actual part.I agree, the additive cost does appear in the cost analysis section of the production order but does not show up as a line item initially. Instead it comes up as a difference item right in the bottom of the screen after totals have been displayed without any line item reference. As if the system is not sure how to display the line item. Once I have done the material issuance confirmation to the order, the additive cost got picked up correctly as I have set it up in the cost component structure as material overhead but again shows up only as variance
Which method you used to debit your production order with additive cost, is it a normal journal entry or through some automatic posting through routing ( example OSC through Purchase order/Good Receipt).I probably need to understand your point more clearly? I am not manually debiting the production order at all for the additive cost. I was expecting SAP to debit the order the same way it does for overheads. Overheads too initially show up as variance but then when we run the overhead calculation KGI2 the overheads costs get debited to the production order. Was expecting similar behavior for additive costs. I am receiving the finished product from the production order into stock via MIGO goods receipt movement type 101. I was expecting the debit to happen perhaps at the time of settlement via CO88 but here the system posted it to the price difference account via account key PRD. This I understand the system did because the settlement rule is set to post all the costs on the material and the material has the valuation control as standard price; so the system is seeing the additive cost as a price difference hence posting it to the price difference account.
System is unaware of the additive cost from actual cost point of view, there is no specification to additive cost from costing variant for actual cost. So you have to debit the order with the additive cost part.So do I manually debit the order with the additive cost? What about the price difference additive cost sitting on the order? Would appreciate if you can tell me the process steps for posting this correctly
regards
Sapluver

Additive cost not picking in costing run

Hi!
I am using additive costing , while doing costing run system is picking up additive cost for header material, that when BOM exploding, but not picking additive cost for componenets.
for us componets are also having price control "S", standard cost esimate has to run. as per valuation variant planned price will be consider for the standard price for components, where there is no BOM
any suggestions on this?
why additve cost is not picking for materials where there is no BOM explosion.
regs,
ramesh

Hi
If child is not having BOM - Then Maintain a Special Proc Key 20 in the Costing view of Mat Master and whatever price you maintain in the Planned Price Fields -can be released as a cost estimate
In that case, If you maintain additive cost, it does not make sense.. You can straight away maintain the requird price in planned price
br, Ajay M

The additive cost can not display on the work order plan cost

dear friends
first i run the ck74n for the additive cost ,second i run the ck11n for cost estimate ,i can see that the additive cost update to the standard cost successfully ,at last i run the ck24 mark and release the standard cost,but when i raise a work order ,i can not see the additive cost in the plan cost ,i do not know the reason ,do you have some suggestion
thanks

Hi
This behaviour is expected and standard...
In Std cost estimate, you have the option of inputting components manually in CK74N... But the actual costs in Prod order will come either from Material issues/Activity Confirmations or manual postings from FI... There is no option to enter additive costs in actuals.. Hence, there is no option of "additive costs" in the Planned costng variant of Prod order
If you enter any additive costs in CK11N, It is done because you cant estimate it through Qty Structure.. But, during actuals, the actual costs are all available through Material issues/Activity Confirmations.. hence, the additive costs does not apply here
BR,Ajay M

Costing BOM and Mixed Costing

A product which is manufactured in-house has more than one production version. Each production version has its own BOM and Recipe. To calculate a blended standard cost, we will use mixed costing functionality and assign ratio to each production version. However we want to copy the BOM usage 1 (production) to BOM usage 6 (costing) and make changes only for costing purpose.
Hence each production version will have a BOM for production and equivalent BOM for Costing as follows:
Production Version/Procurement alternative
BOM for Production
BOM for Costing
1
Usage 1 / Alternative 1
Usage 6 / Alternative 1
2
Usage 1 / Alternative 2
Usage 6 / Alternative 2
If a process order is created with Usage 1 /Alternative 1, how does the system know to compare actual cost with procurement alternative with Usage 6 / Alternative 1 for the purpose of variance calculation?
Thank you,
Siva

Hi
Welcome to SDN
You dont have option to specify the Valuation type in BOM i.e. in the BOM of B, you can only specify A as the Input material... You cant specify C1 or C2
Hence, as a result, costing uses only the average price of C1 and C2 which is maintained in the Mat Master as a PLanned price
MIxed Costing as well as Split Valuation for Material B makes no sense in this case....
If you still want to have Mixed Costing & Splt Valuation in this case - You need to create one more material for Mat A i.e. Separate Mat codes for C1 and C2.. however, it will have its own challenges during MRP as to which material should be ordered, etc
br, Ajay M

Target/Actual/Planned Costs inProduction Order

All,
Can any one explain with example how planned, target,actual cost are calculated for a production order. and also when exactly these are recorded.
Thanks in advance
Sivaram

Hi Sivaram
Target Costs is Std costs for actual goods delivered
Actual Costs are for actual cost of material and activities for actual delivered stock
Here, delivered stock is same in both only the costs consdiered are diff
The diff between target and actual costs is posted to variance.
Goods movement is done with actual price of raw material generally. If u hv price contrl S for RM then it is at standards and all variances are only related to quantity.
Actual costs are compared with standard costs of goods delivered to stock and varainces are calculated for the production order
Regarding scrap costs - it should be separate line item. It depends on many other settings in BOM, Routing, MM and Cost comp structure. Depending on where the scrap is defined calculations are done
If u have defined planned scrap, and is part of cost comp structure, u can get plan vs actual scrap costs
You can also have scrap as not part of cost comp structure and record only actual scrap costs.
Please assign points if the above clarifies further as a way to say thanks

If I wanted to exchange my iPhone 5 for the new iPhone 6 (no additional cost after $199 gift card from selling iPhone 5) do I have to pre-order online or do I just have to show up at a Verizon store Sept 19th?

If I wanted to exchange my iPhone 5 for the new iPhone 6 (no additional cost after $199 gift card from selling iPhone 5) can I pre-order online now or do I just have to show up at a Verizon store Sept 19th?

scodaddy, that is a wonderful question. We are super excited about the new iPhone. You can always pre-order your new iPhone online and then start the mail in rebate by following this link: http://bit.ly/GGnDDC Or you can always go into the store location and do it all in store on the 19th when the phone is launched. That would depend on if the store has them in stock when you go in. I hope that this was able to address your concern.
KevinR_VZW
Follow us on Twitter @VZWSupport

Reoprt for Total Plan Revenue & Cost vs Total Actual Revenues & Cost

Hello Gurus,
Business has requested to extract overall plan VS actual values and total plan revenue & cost VS total actual revenue & Cost for all open sales orders Is there any report to fulfill this requirement. If yes please let me know how to get data from SAP.
Appreciate your help!!
Regards,
Prakash.

Stil there is no reply yet.

LOADING ADDITIONAL COSTS (change matches revenue cost of goods in warehouse

Subject: LOADING ADDITIONAL COSTS (change matches revenue cost of goods in warehouse and not accounting for the year 2008)
Problem:
we must add the cost of goods of the raw material (for which was made a check invoice) of the costs, which are arising and charged by different suppliers (transport, freight, insurance, etc. ..). These are already included in FI with fb60.
The result should be:
- From the consignment of goods entering, add (only in Warehouse (STOCK), NOT IN ACCOUNTING ') cost accessory
- Do not change the quantity
- Having the total cost of stock
- Exploiting the average cost to FIFO must consider the total cost after additional adjustment
Example:                                                                                data
ME21N: purchaise order No. 321 = article 1000kg a price of u20AC / kg 2.30               01/07/2008
MIGO: goods receipt PO confirms price quantity x (u20AC 23,000) batch 298                      07/07/2008
MIRO(enter incoming invoice): Check invoice OK per (u20AC 23,000) batch 298           07/08/2008
Invoices received for costs Accessories:                                                                08/08/2008
FB60: transportation bill on all'purchaise order above cost u20AC / 0.11 kg
0.11 * 1000kg = 110 recorded in cost and accounting of stock.
In accounting, the cost has been reported, in warehouse I need to reverse (add) u20AC / kg to 0.11 initial cost of u20AC / 2.30 kg without adjustments in general accounting, but only in warehouse value and not in the quantity.
So in the end I should have:
batch n° 298 - kg 1000 at a cost of u20AC 2.41 (2.30 +0.11) for the year 2008. How should I do?
thanks

Thomas,
I presume that your client has activated 'Revenue Recognition' component in SAP.
If your client has already activated the RR component, they may be aware that the activation is unreversible.
Recognition of costs in a deferred revenue scenario requires some customization effort but definitely do-able. It is not falling within standard SAP.
I worked on scope of one such project but it did not happen unfortunately.
Can you please post your regular updates in this forum?
All the best.
Thanks
PS: I am not an employee of SAP AG and by answering questions, I am not getting any monetary benefits anywhere. I am answering questions here in my spare time for recognition and the points awarded, which gives me a sense of self-satisfaction. Awarding points is also a way of saying thanks and it will encourage me to answer more questions and share my knowledge and experience

BOM- Actual Additional Cost

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for