Buisness completion of the maintenance order?

Hello friends,
                    can someone please explain the "BUISNESS COMLETION" of the maintenance order,
though we do the technical completion of the maintenance order, but what is the significance of "BUISNESS COMPLETION"
please help................
regards and thanks in advance................
yk

Hi!
This will give you a better idea of business completion.
1. If system status is TECO, it means maintenance job is over, but it doesn't give you any idea whether entire cost is settled on cost receiver or not.
2. If system status is CLSD, it means settlement of cost is done, invoice verification is done.
Business completion is required because there is no indicator available to show whether entire cost is settled or not.
Now  a question arises, why there is no indicator available to show whether cost is settlled on valid cost receiver or not?
Some times your maintenance job is going on and on even more than a month. At the month end you will settle the maintenance cost of the month on cost receiver. Now still there is lot of postings are left to be posted in future. Therefore you can't say that cost is settled on order (Therefore no indicator is available).
But there will be a time in future when entire cost of maintenance will be settled on maintenance order. At that time this is the business completion which will work as an indicato that cost is settled, invoice verifiation is done etc....
hope this may help you.
Regards,
Vaibhav Mishra

Similar Messages

  • Set deletion flag in the maintenance order

    Hi all,
    Am not able to set the deletion flag from the maintenance order, the :set: button is not active. can anyone help me in this regards?
    Or is there any tcode for setting deletion flag to maintenance orders?
    Thanks
    Anish

    hi
    i think it is probably authorization issue ie you don't have the authorization to put the deletion flag
    or check whether you have technically completed the order ,if not try to TECO and then try
    regards
    thyagarajan

  • Set as default value the Item Category in the Maintenance Order

    Hello everyone,
    We are trying to find a user exit in order to set as default value the item category in the Maintenance Order once the Material has been introduced (Tag Components).
    SAP Customizing let the user set the Item Category automatically per Material Type, but we need to set different Item Categories to materials belonging to the same material type.
    We would really appreciate any help relating this issue.
    Thank you very much,
    Víctor Liedo

    Dear Paul,
    Thank you very much for your response.
    I had already tried customizing mentioned by Pithan, but it did not work because we need to set different Item Categories for Materials with same Material Type.
    We have been searching for exits which may let us set Item Category in the Maintenance Order, but it does not seem to be possible.
    What you say about adding some custom validation through user exit, not to set item category as default value, but to check if the one entered is valid, sounds the best way of achieving our commitments.
    I have tried to look for CNEX0037 & CNEX0038, by using transactions SE37 and SE38, search for programs and functions modules, but it did not work. Could you please tell us what kind of objects are?
    Thank you very much in advance.
    Víctor Liedo

  • Budget Process (Linked the maintenance Order into Internal Order) in EAM

    Dear Experts,
    Scenario for Repair & Maintenance with only MM & FICO module live w.e.f. 2007 (PM not live)
    Process Managed thru Internal Order (Order Type: RPMT)
    Budget managed through Investment Management (IM); Budget is directly entered against the IO using transaction IM52
    Scenario for Repair & Maintenance with only MM, FICO & PM module live (PM went live in 2010)
    It was proposed to assign budget against each Maintenance Order.  Since the number of maintenance orders being used is very high, it was decided to link the MO & IO so that budget will be assigned to the IO and when the MO is settled against the IO, the budget in IO can be deducted accordingly. The proposed process to assign budget in Internal Order against each Maintenance Order are given below-:
    1.)     In EAM process one can plan/procure material and External Services only when the Maintenance Order is created & released but practically it has to be planned long before any Maintenance Activity (Maintenance Order to be linked with the estimate so that PO can be created against the estimate).
    2.)     The no. of Maintenance Order generated in EAM Module is very large as Maintenance order is created for almost each and every maintenance activity. It is cumbersome to allocate the budget to each and every maintenance order. There should be a single estimate for maintenance activity (as in MM module) and that should be linked to maintenance order so that the actual cost of Indent/Service Entry Sheet can be deducted automatically from the estimate (Maintenance Order is to be linked with estimate).
    3.)      While doing return Indent the cost of return material is not being added to the maintenance order automatically (Maintenance Order is to be linked with estimate).
    4.)      If Material & External Services not planned in the maintenance order (estimate), the user must be able to do that through Internal Order (estimate), hence the Internal Order must be link to the Maintenance Order. They should able to record the planned & actual cost in the maintenance Order.
    Process followed:
    1.) Created Internal Order in KO01 for Repair & Maintenance Order Type
         Assigned budget to Internal Order thru IM52
    2.) Created PM order and assigned Internal order against Settlement Order in tab  
         u2018Locationu2019 and in Settlement Rule with 100%. In this Section attach the Internal  
         Order with selection type u2018ORDu2019. 
    3.) Released both orders and issue the Material for particular Operation and then   
         determine the Cost for material .After that performed MIGO for consumption of
         materials.
    4.) Settled the PM order in KO88.
         Settlement process was successfully saved.
    Problem faced:
    After posting the goods movement (against each Maintenance Order) and settlement of the maintenance order against IO, we still find the budget assigned to the IO is not consumed/deducted.
    1. Actual cost of maintenance is not reflected in the internal order
        immediately. We have to run cost settlement (t-code KO88) for the
        maintenance order each time the actual cost is incurred in the maintenance order.
    2. Also in the case of return indent, the value of returned material is not directly 
        added to the available budget of internal order.
    3. When the material is issued from store through the reservation generated by 
        maintenance order, system does not check for budget in the internal  
        order/maintenance order while issuing material from the store.
    4.  It must not be allowed to create reservation from the internal order of order type
         RPMT.
    5.  In case of external service in the maintenance order, the unit of
         measure in the requisition is set to u201CD (days)u201D by default. System does not allow  
         changing the unit of measure in the requisition (it should allow to change the unit
         of measure or set the unit of measure u201CJOBu201D).
    6.) When the material is issued from  the store through reservation generated  in
         maintenance order, system does not check for budget in Internal Order  
         (estimate)/Maintenance Order while issuing material from store.
    Thanks & Regards
    Deepak Soni

    Hi,
    1. Actual cost of maintenance is not reflected in the internal order
    immediately. We have to run cost settlement (t-code KO88) for the
    maintenance order each time the actual cost is incurred in the maintenance order.
    As per the standard system budgeting is done against the actual cost only. And until you settle your order the actual cost from
    maint order are not getting transfered to IO. Once they are transfered system is checking for the budget.
    2. Also in the case of return indent, the value of returned material is not directly added to the available budget of internal order.
    This is similar to first point, when you return goods there will be negative cost on the order, this has to be settled until that system will not compare the IO budget with maintenance order actual cost.
    3. When the material is issued from store through the reservation generated by maintenance order, system does not check for budget in the internal order/maintenance order while issuing material from the store.
    The budget you have assigned is at IO, how can system will check the budget while issueing goods for maintenance order. We may have to develop or use some user exit over here. Which will trigger checking of budget from the settlement receiver IO for that maintenance order.
    I think you may have to go for development. These are my observations from my experience.
    Regards,
    NNR

  • How to check, when the Maintenance Order was deleted

    Hello Experts,
                          Can you please tell me of how to check for the maintenance order that when it was deleted and who has deleted that.
    If any T-Code is there or at the Table level also to check the requirement.
    Regards,
    Yawar Khan

    If you want to track when you have put deletion flag, you can track it using above mentioned techniques.
    If you archived (deleted) permanently, then using archival history only, you can check I guess.
    Check these links. While deleting maintenance order, we can hisorical order with same number. Using that creation date, you can track.
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/8d/3e6552462a11d189000000e8323d3a/content.htm
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/8d/3e4d2f462a11d189000000e8323d3a/frameset.htm

  • Reg. Capacity levelling for the maintenance order

    Hi all,
    I am using SAP R3 ECC6.0.
    I have created a maintenance order with order type PM01(Internal).In this order i have assigned Work Center 1 with the Work center category as Labour.And i have assigned 2 operations for this Work center in the maintenance order with the total hours of 60 HRS. and i saved this order & made the status to release.
    Then i went to Tcode CM33 and there i inputed the Work center name and executed it.It opens a Graphical View.But in that view my order no is not displayed .Previous order no. which is there already for that Work center is shown there.
    What could be the Reason.
    As an alternate checking i went to T code CM31 order view.There i Inputed my order no. and executed it but it throws a message
    "No Capacity requirements were found in the evaluation period"
    "No work centers or orders were found"
    What could be the reason.
    Tell me how to overcome this issue.
    More over i want to make dispatch in the capacity levelling.
    Thanks in advance,
    M.Badrinarain.

    hi badri,
    are you checking in the same period ? and next check ur overall profile and time profile assigned to ur overall profile .... u will find order no , operation no .... and once u dispatch operation status gets DSPT .
    regards
    pushpa

  • Fax the Maintenance order to the person responsible to work center

    Hello
    The business requirement is that the maintenance order should be faxed to the person responsible for the main work center used in the maintenance order.
    Please suggest any work around if possible.
    Thanks for your reply.
    Regards
    Santosh

    hello pete,
    the business requirement is that i need to send the work order to the main work center of the order for which the fax no of the main work center will be populate automaticall at the time of or before clicking on print/fax order in iw32, in standard scenerio i can get the fax no from partner function but in this case i do not know how to map it.
    regards,
    Santosh

  • Problem in maintaining the settlement rule in the maintenance order

    Dear Friends,
    I have a problem ,When  I am trying to maintain the settlement rule in the maintenance order ,I am getting information like below
    Decentralized system -> note settlement rule is not distributed
    Message no. /ISDFPS/PM124
    Diagnosis
    You navigated to the settlement rule.
    System Response
    The system informs you that a settlement rule can be created but that it will not be distributed to the target system. Settlement is carried out in the target system, where the order is usually settled to the WBS element of the operation.
    Can anyone throw some light on how this is happeing and remedy?
    Appreciating your early response

    Hello
    Please check
    TC --> KSR2_ORC
    Please maintain the Strategy Sequences for Automatic Generation of Settlement Rule.
    You define a strategy sequence for automatic generation of settlement rules for internal orders.
    Regards,
    Rakesh
    Edited by: RAKESH ASHOK MANE on Sep 3, 2010 12:37 PM

  • Error while saving the maintenance order??

    Dear Experts,
    I am creating maintenance order for order type:PM01 and I given all parameters when I am saving the order I am getting some error called
    " Field reported by must be filled".
    Can u please tell me how to save this order.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Sunil Boya

    Hello Shashank,
    I'm sorry , I could not completely get you. The issue discussed in this thread is a simple one, where the QMNAM field was marked mandatory in the Notification Configuration setting (Tcode OIAL) . See the picture.
    You need to just change the radio-button setting to Input to get rid of this error. If your issue is not this and something-else, then it will be better if you start a new discussion by detailing further, especially about what you want about the integration of Notification and Order. You want it or not?
    Regards
    KJogeswaraRao

  • Purch Req get deleted once the maintenance order is TECO'ed

    Guys,
    Purchase requistion is automatically get deleted once I do the TECO, I think there should be a config to restrict this. Could anyopne knwo what I need to do for this. Thanks.

    Hi Praveen ,
    TECO is assigned to work which is Technically completed (Physical work  completed ).
    When Maintenance work required for the Order is completed , it means that excess material and services planned are no longer required.
    Hence Purchase requisition is automatically get deleted once you do the TECO .
    Any purchase requisitions that have not been converted into purchase orders are deleted . This is standard functionality.
    Though system allows you to do the following
    a)Locked or Unlocked
    b)Set deletion flag
    c) you can still post some cost like invoice receipt for material delivered or consumed
    User Exits will surely help you in this Scenario ,  Your ABAP team will be able to help you here  .
    Regards
    Arif

  • Tables for tracing the Maintenance Order Operation to Purchase requistion

    Hi Everyone,
    Can any one suggest appropriate table for finding the link for tracing Maintenance Order Operation to Purchase Requistion for Service Items.
    My requirement if I give the Order Number, I require Operations in it & PR Item associated if they are Service Items.
    Regards,
    MLN Prasad

    Hi got the Answer myself & thanks fro the answers given by you all.
    The exact way how I got is Pass AUFNR to AFKO and get AUFPL.
    Use this AUFPL in AFVC where we get VORNR (operation Number) also.
    You can use the AUFPL in EBKN ande can get tje PR (BANFN).
    Bye,
    MLN Prasad

  • Technical completion of Plant Maintenance Order

    When we are trying to do a Technical Completion of a PM order we are getting the error as Error in commitment check (see costing log) with Message no. IW079.
    Unable to figure out the missing configs .... kindly help!
    Thanx
    Shivaji

    There might be some open commitments (PO's) against the Order for which you are trying to set this status. Check the commitment report.
    This is nothing to do with configuration as this is standard check.To reduce/cancel the commitments set "Delivery completed" indicator in the purchase order which are using this order as account assignment.
    Regards
    Sreenivas

  • Restriction to Costing Tab in the Maintenance Order Change (IW32) and IW33?

    Hi Gurus -
              I want to restrict the access to costing TAB for a specific Planner Group and Plant.
              Can I restcit the access to costing tab using Authorisation Role?
              Which Authorisation Objects and values I should use.
             Kindly advice.
    Thanking and with best regards,
    Narendra Dere

    Hi Narendra,
    This can be done with help of your ABAP team. There is no standard authorization object to do so.
    Take help of your ABAP team. create one customized authorization object Z_COSTTAB having field as planner group and plant.
    user BADI IF_EX_IWO1_ORDER_BADI - Authorization Check for PM/CS Order.
    With this badi check add check for auth object which you have created. Assign this auth object to ur required user role.
    This will solve your problem.

  • Can not see the ICON of Complete Order (Business Completion) in the IW32.

    Hi All,
              I want to Complete the Maintenance Order (Business Completion) but I can not see Icon - Complete Order. to complete the Maintenance Order. I understand Order --- Function -
    Completion  path can be used for competeion but it is disabled.
              For Superuser's LOGIN they have the ICON for complete Orders and they can see any error message for completiing Orders. Since I cant perform complete Order I can not see any error message.
             Is there any user settings for ICON's display.
    Regards,
    Narendra

    It is assigned in role 
    To display - run PFCG and select the role click display and select authorisation tab click details icon and click organisation level to view the Buisness transaction
    To maintain - Run PFCG and select role : SAP_Workorder_Closer ,Click the pencil and click on the authorisation tab and change authorisation value and eithier you can manually maintain I_BETRVORG with BABS value. or Choose Plant maintenance business transaction from the structure and add BABS and generate the profile. then execute the transaction.
    Co-ordinate with Basis or Security team
    Thanks
    S.N

  • How to configure G/L accounts for maintenance order completion confirmation IW48.

    Hi Gurus
    When doing completion confirmation of a maintenance order material costs are being posted to Cost of goods sold account. How do I bypass the posting of material costs to this account because the same costs are being posted during settlement of order costs as well?
    Regards
    Joseph

    Hi Joseph,
    I'm not sure that Completion Confirmation if Maintenance Orders (MO) will generate FI Posting.
    Normally, Completion Confirmation will generate CO Document with Secondary Cost Element.
    But, at Settlement process of Maintenance Order (MO), it's possible to generate FI Posting depends on Settlement Rule.
    Please ensure about your inquiry.
    Thanks
    Adi

Maybe you are looking for