Capital exp. Internal order

Hi,
I am making purchase order for a captial expenditure by defining the Internal order for that, but the system is showing the warning message " Don't  assign co object to account XXXXXX" & the message no. is KI281.
As it is the asset purchase therefore it is picking the reconciliation account & which is balance account & don't require  co object.
But I am confused then how do we co link this budgeting with the asset purchase.
please tell me which setting is missing.
Regards
Meenakshi

Hi,
   You have to create cost elements of type 90 for your Asset accounts
Kind regards

Similar Messages

  • Interest calculation on Capital expenditure Internal Order

    Hello,
    We have an requirement that if capital internal Order is more that $ 250,000 and project runs more than 90 days, then interest should calculate on balance amount. I know that SAP does calculate interest on PS system. But I am quite doubt on capital internal order which ultimately settle to AUC. Is there any way to calculate interest against internal order in SAP? Your guidance will be highly appreciated.
    Regards,
    Nabin

    Yes it works the same as PS.  Once you create the Interest profile you can assign it to a model Internal Order on the Period End Closing Tab.  For existing Internal Orders you can assign it to the order on the Period End Closing Tab. The Interest Profile field must not be suppressed. The Field selection is in the Order Type if it not turned on
    Creating a model Order is SPRO / Controlling / Internal Orders / Order Master Data / Screen Layout / Define Model Orders
    Changing the fileld selection on IO is SPRO / Controlling / Internal Orders / Order Master Data / Screen Layout / Select Fields look at the bottom left corner.

  • Only one internal order allowed for Cost center/GL combination  -validation

    Dear Friends,
    We are using internal orders for controlling department wise budgets.
    my client wants that he be able to post only through one GL account to one internal order
    that is for Marketing dept,(departments are created as cost centers)
    Canteen exp              internal order 1000
    Entertainment exp     internal order 1001
    Gift exp                     Internal order 1002
    that is when GL account canteen exp is used (for cost center 1000 (marketing)) then internal order 1000 can be used but if entertainment exp is to be booked  internal order 1000 cannot be used. in this case only internal order 1001 should be allowed
    We are using real internal order (settlement will happen at end of month)
    Can you let me know if this is possible in standard SAP or any workaround.
    Regards,

    Hi Sangharsh,
    If internal order must be filled in these GL then you can meet your requirement by creating the validation. To meet this requirement three steps are to be created in one validation. One step is created below to make you create two more steps by your self.
    Create validation under Financial Accounting Line Item using transaction GGB0.
    Step 1.
    Prerequisites. (Go to settings>Expert mode and fill following)
    BSEG-BUKRS = '1000' AND (here instead of 1000 you enter your company code)
    BSEG-HKONT = '450000'      (here instead of 450000 you enter GL for canteen expense)
    Check
    BSEG-AUFNR = '1000'
    Message
    Click on pencil icon and create below message or the message you want.
    Intenal Order 1000 is allowed for canteen expenses.
    Assign this validation to your company code using transaction OB28 with call up point 2.
    Similarly you can create two more steps. Thus your requirement can be met.
    Regards,
    Chintan Joshi.

  • Internal order number is not picking in Capital PO

    Dear All,
             While creating capital PO the account assignment tab internal order number field is not getting updated. While entering the asset number the internal order number field shows blank.
              Kindly advise me to rectify the setting, If I done wrong.
    Thanks...
    Edited by: saravana j on Jun 14, 2010 10:33 AM

    Yes this is correct. How the system should know the internal order?
    When you use a combination assets / internal orders the proces steps are:
    Create a investment internal order
    Assign the PO to the internal order order.
    The costs are posted on the IO
    Settle the cost to the AUC
    Final setle the costs from the AUC to the final asset

  • Down payment against the Internal Order - for Capital Expenditure

    Dear friends
    I am getting an error while making down payment against the purchase order.
    The order of my entries or steps are as follows:
    Created one internal order for Capital WIP with budget and availability control activation.
    Created one purchase order against a vendor with reference to the above Internal Order.
    When I am making the down payment to the vendor through tcode:F-48, the system throwing an error
    "Define Cost Elements for Down Payments".
    Can any one please explain why this error is coming. When I checked in Internal orders, there is a TCode: OKEP for Define Default Cost Elements for Down Payments.
    System is asking for cost element, but where as what ever the down payment we are making is nothing but advance which is current asset. Why system is asking for cost element?
    Can any one give me the guidance how to handle the issue.
    Thanks in Advance
    Kiran Kumar A

    The reason is when you want the down payment for AUC to be capitalised, then you would need to create cost element for Downpayments.
    Normally as per design of SAP, down payment being a Balance Sheet Account (Current Asset as you rightly mentioned) doesnot need / accept an Cost object, as a special case since down payments for AUC needs to be capitalised and hence need to be carried to Controlling (Internal Order) by creating Cost Element for Downpayments.
    Go ahead and create the cost element. That would resolve your issue.

  • Capital cash flow report thru internal order

    Hello experts
    Our client needs report inrespect of procurement of capital assets through internal order.(We use both statistical and real orders)The report is to be consists of 1.sanction number(Internal order KO01),2.sanction amount maintained in the order KO22 and the 3.commitments i.e.PO releases and 4.Cash out flow against the sanctions and committments.Iam trying the check the relevant tables but iam not getting the sequence of table in which i can extrat the data.can anybody having idea or developed this type of developement plse reply soon.
    thanks in advance
    RAJA

    Hi
    As you said that standard report for budget/actul/committements available.But our requirment is we have budgets in combination of assets class,dept,cost center and project and have sepatare snction ref number for each of those.we want to give report sanction number wise and the report should consists of previous year sanction amount,current year sanction,committments i.e.PO releases,committments against the previous year and current year,cash out flow against the committments i.e with reference to sanction number what is actul cash out flow.pls let me know if you know ligic to be build while development.
    raja

  • Internal Order, Capital investment order enduser documentation

    Can any Guru send me enduser documentation for Internal order of type Capital Investment? Email: [email protected]
    Thank you!

    Hello,
    the little late answer to your question is the table IMZO. It links the investment program / positions to internal orders. I found this thread while searching for my own problem which is quite the same:
    In my WebDynpro for ABAP investment planning tool I'm using the FM BAPI_INTERNALORDER_CREATE to create internal orders as a result of the planning process. This BAPI is similiar to the transaction ko01 except that I can't assign an investment program / position to my internal order (this is also pointed out in the help to the BAPI/FM).
    But how can I assign an investment program / position to my internal order NOT using an ABAP insert/update statement on the table IMZO (which links the internal orders and investment programs/positions).
    Does anybody know a FM or BAPI I could use? I really don't like the idea of a self made insert/update into a sap table...
    Thank you in advance,
    Christian Bracht

  • Settlement Rule for Internal Order

    Hi All
    I have Maintained Settlement rule for Internal order as under
    CAT - FXA
    Settlement Receiver - Asset
    % - 100
    Settlement type - Full
    Now after settlement of above Order in KO88 . I want again use above internal order. Hence i have trying to put Settlement rule 50% for some anther asset but system gave me following error. Please guide on this issue.
    Total = 50.00%, ( Set.Type PER / Version / Actual settlement ), period 010/2011
    Message no. KD042
    Diagnosis
    You have entered distribution rules which settle 50.00% in total. This applies for settlement view ( Set.Type PER / Version / Actual settlement ) in period 010/2011.
    When checking the percentage total, the system found one of the following errors:
    The total percentage for the distribution rules is more than 100%
    The total percentage for the distribution rules is less than 100% and this is a rule for full settlement.
    The total percentage for the distribution rules is less than 100% and the 100% check is switched on in the settlement profile.

    Hi:
            Please refer to the contents of OSS Note 45612 - IM: pre-settlement does not work, or KD042... which states
    "Symptom
        1. If a preliminary settlement rule (for example, to cost center) is entered for individual items of capital investment measures with line item management, this rule is not considered during periodic settlement. There is no settlement to cost centers.
        2. If you enter a final settlement rule for individual line items of investment measures with line item management for a partial capitalization (that is, the percentage rate is less than 100%), then you receive the unjustified error message KD042 "Total percent = xx%".
    Additional key words
    KOB5, CJ70, CJ88, CJ8G, KO88, KO8G, preliminary settlement, partial settlement, partial capitalization
    Cause and prerequisites
        1. You did not enter the settlement type ACT in the preliminary settlement rule.
        You can check this in the Line Item Apportionment transaction by choosing the menu option "Goto" -> "Overview dist. rules" to display the distribution rule groups entered so far.
        The system displays rules which have no entry in the "SetTyp" field (settlement type, field name PERBZ).
        2. The check of the percentages is incorrect.
    Solution
        1. Install the following correction. Afterwards reverse the incorrect settlement, re-enter the preliminary settlement rule and settle again.
        2. Install the following correction. Afterwards, you can maintain the settlement rule for the partial settlement.
        Note: If you want to use a default settlement rule (maintaining the settlement rule from the master data maintenance transaction), then you are required to distribute the line items at 100%. In order to carry out a partial capitalization (settlement of less than 100%), you have to use menu path "Actual postings -> Period-end closing -> Settlement -> Line item "
    Regards

  • Settling investment internal orders to an asset (AA310 msg)

    hi.
    I am wondering if somebody can shed some light for me on the following:
    let's say we have 2 investment internal orders (representing 2 different projects) which are to be settled to one asset.
    for the 1st order the job was done and the status changed to TECO in 2010. Upon full settlement (KO8G, full ) the cost has been settled to an asset (from AuC) and the asset has been capitalized. the capitalization (aquisition) date was set to the end of the period (e.g. Dec 31, 2010).
    the status of the 2nd order has been changed to TECO in 2011. Currently when I'm trying to do a full settlement of the 2nd IO (with KO8G, partial capilazation) I'm getting AA310 (asset value date in diff year) as far as the system is trying to default the asset value date to date when the IO status was chagned to TECO (2011).  I do not want to default the asset value date on the KOG8 screen.
    The question - what is wrong in my approach and what should I do in the case I have a second investment orders to settle to a final asset.
    Sorry if I was not clear, i'm primarly an abaper but trying to understand some business processes related to internal orders and settlement. any information to understand this relationship would be appreciated.
    thank you,
    viktor

    Creation of Internal Order- KO01
    Maintain Settlement receiver as the AUC asset
    Settle the Internal Order- KO88
    Now the values have come to AUC asset
    Distribution of AUC- AIAB
    Enter the Settlement receiver as the Main Asset
    Settlement of AUC- AIBU

  • INTERNAL ORDER REPORT

    we want to generate a list of Internal Orders  which have not been capitalized.  Is there any std report available for that?  If no, then I will have to get it from some tables?  What logic do I use to get it?
    Can you help me with this?
    Regards
    RRR
    Edited by: rama raju on Jan 3, 2008 8:20 AM

    Hi,
    There is a Standard ABAP report KOK4-Automatic collective processing for Internal orders.  Here, it allows to create a variant with all reporting possibilities. 
    I think in your case, you should create a new variant by giving the settlement receiver category as 'FXA' and type as'FUL' and execute the report.
    But I am for sure that this report will help in doing your task but only thing is you should create the variant by including all the reporting parameters properly.
    Good Luck!!!!!
    Thanks and Regards,
    Bhuvaneswari.S

  • Internal Order Report - For the documnets when the cost ele. was not create

    Hi,
    We created internal orders for tracking capital expenditure relating to assets. At that time, we were not created asset GL's as cost element. Recently we created asset GL's as cost elements (category 90).
    Now we are getting the internal order report after creation of cost element for the transactions done thereafter. We mentioned the internal order number in PO but not in accounting document earlier. Now we are maintaining internal order number in accounting document also.
    So when we run OKBA we are getting CO document but, it is not tracking against internal order (since order number was not mentioned earlier). We executed one MM document in which internal order was mentioned through OKBB but there is no change in the internal order report.
    Is there any possibility to get the internal order report for the transactions done before creation of cost element.
    Please guide me
    Best Regards
    Madhusekhar Gupta G

    Hi,
    Thanks for your quick replies.
    Can we get the report as follows.
    1. Total Po's value for the internal Order (through Table EKKN)                                                      xxx
    Less: Value already posted to Internal order after creation of cost elements (S_alr_87013019)  xxx
    Less: Total Value to be invoiced (Tcode -ME2N)                                                                             xxx
    Net amount to be posted to Internal Order manually                                                                        xxx
    Is it correct?
    Regards
    Madhusekhar Gupta G
    Edited by: gms gupta on Feb 20, 2012 4:33 PM

  • Check on internal order

    Hi,
    I am using internal order as a settlement receiver for capital maintenance order.
    But some times accounts department closes the internal order before capital maintenance order settlement on this internal order.
    I want to apply some check on internal order so that during closing of internal order system should check all the capital order maintenance order whether they are fully settled or not.
    Plz suggest how to achieve this.
    Regards
    Rakesh

    Rakesh,
    You need to check with your FICO team for a suitable user-exit or BADI relating to internal orders.
    Alternatively, open a new post in the Financials forum.
    PeteA
    Moderator: Certainly, there is no need in opening new post!

  • Advance payment against the Internal Orders - Capex

    Dear friends
    Can you please explain what configuration we have to do regarding the Down payment made against the Internal Orders created for Capital Expenditure.
    Please let me know what cost element category we have to take for Down Payments made against the Internal Orders.
    Please let me know in detail manner.
    Thanks in Advance
    Kiran A

    -

  • Internal Order Error

    Dear friends
    I am getting an error while making down payment against the purchase order.
    The order of my entries or steps are as follows:
    Created one internal order for Capital WIP with budget and availability control activation.
    Created one purchase order against a vendor with reference to the above Internal Order.
    When I am making the down payment to the vendor through tcode:F-48, the system throwing an error
    "Define Cost Elements for Down Payments".
    Can any one please explain why this error is coming. When I checked in Internal orders, there is a TCode: OKEP for Define Default Cost Elements for Down Payments.
    System is asking for cost element, but where as what ever the down payment we are making is nothing but advance which is current asset. Why system is asking for cost element?
    Can any one give me the guidance how to handle the issue.

    The reason is when you want the down payment for AUC to be capitalised, then you would need to create cost element for Downpayments.
    Normally as per design of SAP, down payment being a Balance Sheet Account (Current Asset as you rightly mentioned) doesnot need / accept an Cost object, as a special case since down payments for AUC needs to be capitalised and hence need to be carried to Controlling (Internal Order) by creating Cost Element for Downpayments.
    Go ahead and create the cost element.  That would resolve your issue.

  • In AS03 internal order field is not being utilised

    Hi All,
    In the master data (AS 03 ) internal  order field under the Tab, Time dependent is not being utilized because when the field is filled with I/O No it is generating wrong depreciation(additional) in COu2019S module which is to be rectified..     
    This field as a matter of fact needs to be filled up, to know from where the asset is capitalized. Correct me if i am wrong.
    Regards,
    Arvind

    Hi Arvind,
    This field in the tab Tab, Time dependent is used for the depreciation posting.
    When you want to see where it comes from you have to use the ftab origin.
    If you settle the cost from an investment order/project it fills in automatecly this value in the tab origin

Maybe you are looking for