CAPTURING OF COST IN PROFITABILITY ANALYSIS FOR BY PRODUCT

Dear Team,
We had a requirement when standard material cost estimate is executed we can get the standard price for main material as well as by product for which values are flowing to COPA (T.code KE30).
The scenario works fine for Main Product, since the actuals as well as Costs are flowing to COPA. Where as only actuals are posting to byproduct as there are no separate cost estimate for Byproduct.
So only acutals are caputured to Profitability analysis.
At present we are manually changing the price of the byproduct material through MR21 which is constant through out the period.
Our requirement:- Since Byproduct doesnt have any separate BOM and Routing, Is it possible to capture this byproducts price to COPA.
or
capturing of COGS for this byproducts price is also ok.
Please anybody can guide me.
Thanks & regards,
Sandeep

Dear Santosh,
Thanks for your early reply.
It might work, Please elaborate.
Request you to send any document if you have any, since i am new in CO.
it was availbale in my user profile.
Thanks & regards,
Sandeep

Similar Messages

Double actual cost in Profitability Analysis for cancelled billing doc

Dear expert
Say we have a billing doc posted in May, and we run ML closing and KE27 during month end closing, which transfered actual cost from material ledger to value field in PA.
In June, we cancelled that billing document, the question is why the system automatically posted actual cost of cancelled billing docs to value field in PA right away (without KE27)?
The reason I asked is because when we run KE27 for June closing, the SAP transfer again actual cost from material ledger to value field in PA. So we will have double posting of actual cost for cancelled billing document
Please help, which setting did I missed to prevent SAP automatically posted actual cost of cancelled billing docs to value field in PA right away (without KE27)?
Thx

Hi
Thats because you had double +ve also..
Let me u/s your situation better
1.PGI Posted COGS of Say, 100
2. KE27 posted, say, addnl 20
So, total COGS is now 120
3. You posted a reversal now... It should post -100 and not -120.... Is it posting -120?
Run KE27 for this month and see if it really posts -120 again... If it does, raise an OSS message to SAP... They are liable to help
In my opinion, there is no Config set up for this... At best, you can try to assign different VF in KE4R for PV = 02 as compared to PV=01 and see if it helps
br, Ajay M

COPA Values in the Profitability analysis for a credit memo request

Hi All,
When I am trying to create an Invoice document for a Credit Memo request having a Configurable material , in the accounting document profitable analysis Profit Center view fields are not getting updated.
If we do the same thing for a reference material profit center view fields are getting updated properly.
What is the problem with the Configurable material.
Thanks in advance,
RajaMahi

I would start fresh with a new sales order. When you create with reference both the return delivery and credit memo are created with reference to the return sales order. Here is an example document flow to clarify:
Document                                      Date               Qty/value   UoM/Cur   Overall proc. status
                                                                                Return 60000077 / 10                          08/25/05               10.000 EA      Completed
. Returns Delivery 500000016 / 10             08/25/05               10.000 EA      Completed
.. GD returns QI 4900030060 / 1               08/25/05               10.000 EA      complete
.. Credit for Returns1 10000017 / 10          08/25/05               10.000 EA      Completed
... Accounting document 10000017              08/25/05               10.000 EA      Cleared

Profitability Analysis for Project and Project Team

Hello Experts,
Need your ideas and expertise to the below business case, could be simple or complicated, please provide some insight.
the business case is like this. 2 specific project teams are available. there can be around 10 projects executed in a year. So in our PS we can have project team allocated to a project. workforce planning is done for the project for effective utilization, it is like 2 projects with 2 teams assigned. till now it is fine. the business calls for that 1 st team is assigned to another project only after closure of the assigned project.
Let us assume P1, P2,...P10 are the projects in a year. Assume T1, T2 are the teams available. Initially T1 is assigned to P1, T2 is assigned to P2.
Business confirms that T1 will be assigned to P3 only after completion of P1. This requirement is also straight. Assume that team T1 has executed 6 projects and team T2 has executed 4 projects.
The requirement is profitability analysis at project level i.e at P1, P2, ...P10 which is also pretty straight. Business requirement is also to have profitability analysis against each team i.e for T1 and T2. it is like each team has a project lead and team assigned under him. based on the expenses and revenue booked against the team, there will be performance evaluation of the team.( assume that P1, P3, P5, P6, P8,P9 are the projects executed by team T1, we need to have revenue and expenses of the said projects to be mapped to team T1 as well), so we have profitability analysis at team level.
Experts, require your advice on how to map the requirement. Is there any possibility to map projects to team rather assigning team to a project. please advice. provide some insight on how do we map the scenario.
Regards,
Murthy

Hello Murthy,
In SAP you carry out Month end closing activities. In order to carry out this activity, you post all period based data on the project. Subsequently data relevant for Profitability analysis can be determined for the given period and then this data can be settled to COPA.
This data can be evaluated in the project information system or in Profitability analysis.
You can check report KE30 for Profitability Analysis.
Refer SAP help for more details
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2004/helpdata/en/7a/4c3aad4a0111d1894c0000e829fbbd/content.htm
Regards
Tushar

Need info for COPA (Cost based profitability analysis)- Archiving objects

Hi All,
SAP have introduced new 2 Archiving objects COPAA_xxxx, and COPAB_xxxx instead of the old archiving object COPA1_xxxx.
Where xxxx = operating concern.
Can any one please give the document path how to archive the COPA data.
Means exactly i want the variant parameters for the 2 new archiving objects.
Please waiting for your reply...
Thanks,
Nagendra

Hi Chandra sekhar,
I need to Archive the data in R/3 system & ECC6.0 not in BW system.
I want the steps how to Archive the 2 objects COPAA_xxxx, COPAB_xxxx in ECC6.0 System.
Please if have any info please help me...
Thanks,
Nagendra

Derivation of batch number in Profitability Analysis for Sales document

Hi Gurus
We are trying to put Batch number in PA derived through sales order sales delivery document but due to timing issue like do not have billing document untill processed and PA derivation done
scenario SA created with multiple line items
Batch number can be seen in Delivery document number
Thanks in advance

We are trying to put Batch number in PA derived through sales order sales delivery document but due to timing issue like do not have billing document untill processed and PA derivation done
scenario
SO created with no batch number
In the Delivery split batch into two seperate lines with batch numbers in it
PA post two seperate lines however unbale to map batch numbers
Btach number exist in tables MSEG, LIPS and VBRP
Unfortunately these postings happen after updating PA so not available for derivation in PA
Thanks in advance

LSMW on Profitability Analysis for KE21N

Hi Experts
I have 5 hours in which I must do numerous direct postings to PA. I will not have time for a programmer to do the BAPI that is used for this.
Has anyone successfully used an LSMW to load an excel spreadsheet save in CSv format?
Hope that you can help.
Kind regards
Dawn

Hi Ajay
Thank you very much. You did use a LSMW hey?
It is an onerous LSMW to do, and I don't want to spend too much time on it if it is not going to work. I have used the comma delimited (CSV) from excel in other ones sucessfully.
Many thanks
Dawn

MICs duplicated in COA (Certificate For Analysis) for Finish Product.

Hi, Champions,
I have problem in printing COA:
We are using TL type "Q" inspection plan.
         Operation:1 Chemical Test
                       MIC:0010 Test-1
                       MIC:0020 Test-2
         Operation:2 Physical Test
                       MIC:0010 Test-1
                       MIC:0020 Test-2
                       MIC:0030 Test-3
Manageing individual COA profile for each Material.
We have customized COA report.
When we are trying to take printout from it, it is printing the COA for all the Operations two times. Means one more time then it is there in the Task List.
The parameters for the COA Profile are as below.
      1. Level for Result Selection: - Summarized
      2. Origin of the Characteristic Result on the Certificate: - Inspection Result.
      3. Origin of Characteristic Short Text: - Master Inspection Charecteristic.
      4. Origin of Inspection Specifications: - Inspection specfication from QM.
      5. Output Strategy for Skip Characteristics: - Text from text element of function group.
Pls let me know, where is the possibility of cause for this descipancy in COA.
Regards,
Shyamal

Hi Craig,
Thanks for your involvement.
The layout that is generated by QC21 was no where meeting the requirement. So layout was configured. Then data was there in big number of verity hence all the detrails was requried to be fatched from Inspection plan itself. Not from MICs (QS21,,as STD report does).
These were the circumstances. And it was propoerly tested and is working fine also.
But recently we had SAP GO LIVE for, two more mfg facility(Plant) and it is showing this bug overhere only.
But any ways thank you all for kind support.
Regards,
Shyamal

Customizing Monitor in Profitability Analysis

Hello SAP-team!
What functions are provided by the Customizing Monitor in Profitability Analysis?
ps: thanks to SAP-community!
Eugene

Hi,
Customizing monitor in Profitability analysis as follows..
General topics:
35288 Technical Documentation CO-PA
69384 Account-based Profitability Analysis
199467 New act assignment table as of Release 4.5
2. Master data:
a) Characteristics and value fields:
13377 Naming conflicts in characteristics and value fields
21207 Deleting a charctrstc/value field from an op.concern
40336 Maintaining foreign keys for characteristics
76493 Changing texts of characteristics or value fields
b) Characteristics derivation and submission of characteristics values
32719 Customer hierarchy in CO-PA
33968 SD/CO-PA: Characteristics from sales document tables
36557 SD/CO-PA: Transfer partner functions to CO-PA
62690 Product hierarchy in CO-PA
93652 Info: Variant configuration in CO-PA
134889 Info on derv. of char:Why not all flds avail.?
148609 Char.deriv.:deriv. rule vals miss.aft.upgrade&trnsp.
172740 Techn.docum.charct. derivtn as of Release 4.0
c) Valuation
40408 Valuation for record types 'B' and 'C'
62536 Valuation using conditions in Profitability Analysis
67240 Info: Valuation with material cost estimate
111232 INFO: Valuation for materials valuated separately
144337 INFO rounding differences: Valuation with costing
142628 Behaviour of user exit in periodic valuation
3. Actual data transfer:
20254 Values from SD are not transferred to CO-PA
37114 Incorrect setup/reversal of provisions
33178 +/- sign logic in CO-PA (SD/FI interface)
52849 Transfer of conditions with +/- signs
39635 Profitability segment by substitution exits
64768 FI/CO-PA: Problems with exchange rate differences
87704 Cost-of-goods-sold Reconciliation: FI to Co-PA
83702 Acct assignmt logic sales order proc. - REM
111309 Transfer of quantities into CO-PA
185826 Enhancement COPA0005
a) Correction of data inconsistencies
69370 Clearing data inconsistencies in CO-PA
70718 Correctn of data inconsistency for order recpt
140457 Correcting data inconsstncs in incoming orders
126937 Correction of billing data inconsistency
93051 Restructure of the segment level from line items
4. Planning:
67191 Useful tips on the CO Planning Processor
72110 KE11: Long runtimes/timeout
77476 Information: Top-down planning
124598 CO-PA Planning: FAQs
5. Information system:
21773 Performance in reporting (summarization data)
83204 Usage strategy for summarization levels
136216 Fast rollup for summ. levels for costing-based CO-PA
6. Tools:
134430 Euro conversion and CO-PA
19015 Termination during external data transfer
19410 Characteristic validation during external data transfer
44658 Error with batch input for KE21
40994 Transport Profitability Analysis (CO-PA) to 3.0
52636 CO-PA Customizing transport
128862 Transport Customizing CO-PA in 4.0A/B
131664 Transport of operating concern structures 4.0
144015 Client copy and CO-PA/EC-EIS
65999 Information: Supported ALE scenarios in CO-PA
94458 CO-PA Realignments: documentation
113050 Segment table repair after realignments
127334 Missing archiving of profitability segments
199959 Change assignmt for operating concern
67839 Generating parts of an operating concern environment
69829 Delete operating concern in Release 3.0
106314 Delete operating concern in Release 3.1
562043 - Transfer actual costs to Profitability Analysis
544241 - INFO:Customizing Monitor new fnc 'Report Overview'.
429517 - INFO: Currency translation Billing document -> CO-PA
428563 - Material cost estimate valuatn: Translaton for posting date
400237 - CO-PA INFORMATION: Line item in company code currency
199959 - Information: change assignmt for operating concern
199467 - Info: New act assignment table as of Release 4.5
185826 - Information: Enhancement COPA0005
172740 - Info.:Techn.docum.charct.derivtn as of Release 4.0
148609 - Char.deriv.:deriv.rule vals miss.aft.upgrade&trnsp.
144337 - INFO rounding differences: valuation with costing
144015 - CC-INFO: client copy and CO-PA/EC-EIS
142628 - Behaviour of user exit in periodic valuation
140457 - Info:Correcting data inconsstncs in incoming orders
136216 - Fast rollup for summ.levels for costing-based CO-PA
134889 - CO-PA Info on derv.of char:Why not all flds avail.?
134430 - Information: Euro conversion and CO-PA
131664 - INFO: Transport of operating concern structures 4.0
128862 - INFO: Transport Customizing CO-PA in 4.0A/B
127334 - Missing archiving of profitability segments
126937 - INFO: Correction of billing data inconsistency
124598 - Info: CO-PA planning: frequently asked questions
113050 - Segment table repair after realignments
111309 - INFO: Transfer of quantities into CO-PA
111232 - INFO: Valuation for materials valuated separately
106314 - Delete operating concern in Release 3.1
94458 - CO-PA Realignments: documentation
93652 - Info: Variant configuration in CO-PA
93051 - Restructuring the segment level from line items
83702 - INFO: Acct assignmt logic sales order proc. - REM
83204 - Usage strategy for summarization levels
77476 - Information: top-down planning
76493 - Changing texts of characteristics or value fields
75334 - INFO:Downloading CO-PA correctn package fm SAPSERV
72110 - KE11: Long processing times / timeout
70718 - INFO:Correctn of data inconsistency for order recpt
69829 - Delete operating concern in Release 3.0
69384 - Information: Account-based Profitability Analysis
69370 - INFO: Clearing data inconsistencies in CO-PA
67839 - Generating parts of an operating concern environment
67240 - Info: valuation with material cost estimate
67191 - Info: Useful tips on the CO Planning Processor
65999 - Information: Supported ALE scenarios in CO-PA
64768 - FI/CO-PA: Problems with exchange rate differences
62690 - Info: product hierarchy in CO-PA
62536 - Info: Conditions in Profitability Analysis
52849 - INFO: Transfer of conditions with +/- signs
52636 - INFO: CO-PA Customizing transport
44658 - Error with batch input for KE21
40994 - INFO:Transprt Profitability Analysis (CO-PA) to 3.0
40408 - Info: Valuation for record types "B" and "C"
40336 - Info: maintaining foreign keys for characteristics
39635 - Info: finding the profitability segment using a substitution
37114 - Incorrect setup/reversal of provisions
36557 - Info SD/CO-PA:transfer partner functions to CO-PA
35288 - Profitability Analysis: Technical Documentation
33968 - SD/CO-PA: Characteristics from sales doc tables
33178 - INFO: +/- sign logic in CO-PA (SD/FI interface)
32719 - INFO: Customer hierarchy in CO-PA
21773 - Performance in Reporting (Summarization data)
21207 - Deleting a charctrstc/value field from an op.concern
20254 - INFO: Values from SD not transferred to CO-PA
19410 - INFO: Char.validity check f.external data transfer
19015 - Termination during external data transfer
13377 - INFO: Naming conflicts in charactrst. & value flds.
Thanks
Prasada

How to Calculate Profitability Analysis ?

Hi
kishore
This is basically a part of Sales and Distribution Module . can u just revert me back with the Answer .
Regards
kishore

Dear kishore
Profitability Analysis (CO-PA) enables you to evaluate market segments, which can be classified according to products, customers, orders or any combination of these, or strategic business units, such as sales organizations or business areas, with respect to your company's profit or contribution margin.
The aim of the system is to provide your sales, marketing, product management and corporate planning departments with information to support internal accounting and decision-making.
Two forms of Profitability Analysis are supported: costing-based and account-based.
Costing-based Profitability Analysis is the form of profitability analysis that groups costs and revenues according to value fields and costing-based valuation approaches, both of which you can define yourself. It guarantees you access at all times to a complete, short-term profitability report.
Account-based Profitability Analysis is a form of profitability analysis organized in accounts and using an account-based valuation approach. The distinguishing characteristic of this form is its use of cost and revenue elements. It provides you with a profitability report that is permanently reconciled with financial accounting.
Thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Implemented CO-PA (Profitability Analysis)

I would like to know if anyone has implemented Controlling - Profitability Analysis for a IS-Uitilities customer? I have some specific questions on this topic and would appreciate if someone could answer them.
Raj

Hi Ivor
Re: Implementation: ISU Biling COPA Integration
Excuse me Ivor Martin for jumping on the bandwagon, I am in the process of implementing ISU Biling COPA Integration. I do have the cookbook but it does not clarify certain things i would like you to help me with as follows:
1.Operating concern
I am busy widentifying characteristics to use from Billing document. My question is should I set up Opconcern as in pure COPA,i.e working from reporting structure & subsequent derivation of e.g profit center?
I would like to be certain about this. Please advice me also with any other information you dem relevant.
2.I would also like to know about the pros and cons of transferring updates if that is ok with you.
Thanks in advance.

Type of Profitability analysis

Hi
What are the two forms of COPA Reporting in SAP
Vaibhav

Hi
Costing-based Profitability Analysis is the form of profitability analysis that groups costs and
revenues according to value fields and costing-based valuation approaches, both of which
you can define yourself. It guarantees you access at all times to a complete, short-term
profitability report.
Account-based Profitability Analysis is a form of profitability analysis organized in accounts
and using an account-based valuation approach. The distinguishing characteristic of this
form is its use of cost and revenue elements. It provides you with a profitability report that is
permanently reconciled with financial accounting.
Thanks & Best Regards
Sanil K Bhandari

GR for a Production order to be controlled on actual /planned cost

Hi,
               When I do a GR for a production order I want to restrict the GR if my actual cost of materials consumed for the production order is less that 80 % of the planned cost of that production order. There is no provision for restricting the above.
When GR is done for a partial quantity of the production order, the system should consider and compare the GR quantity material cost against the same GR quantity Planned cost in the production order. If the GR quantity actual material value is less than 80% of the GR quantity material planned value, then the system should stop the GR to stores.
Eg:
Production Order for 10 Units of material X
BOM for X are Material A, B and C
Planned quantity to manufacture 10 units of material X is: A 10 unit, B 10 Unit, C 10 Unit
                                The planned value for the material BOM is : A 100
                              B 75
                              C 25
                                     Total Value to manufacture material X is Rs .200
Case 1
If only 5 units are manufactured using the production order.
The GR to stores must be allowed only after the system check the total actual materials consumed in the production to produce 5 units exceeds 80% of the 5 units planned material cost.
Planned Material Value               Actual Material Value
A. 510 = 50                         A. 59 = 4
B. 57.5 = 37.5                         B. 56 = 30
C. 52.5 = 12.5                         C. 52 = 10
Total planned material Value is Rs 100            Total actual material Value is Rs 85
The above case shows that the actual material consumed in the production order is more than 80% of the planned materials. So, the system should allow the GR to stores.
It should check only material cost only.
Case 1I
If 10 units are manufactured using the production order.
The GR to stores must be allowed only after the system check the total actual materials consumed in the production to produce 10 units exceeds 80% of the 10 units planned material cost.
Planned Material Value                    Actual Material Value
A. 1010 = 100                         A. 109 = 90
B. 107.5 = 75                            B. 56 = 30
C. 102.5 = 25                                     C. 52 = 10
Total planned material Value is Rs 200          Total actual material Value is Rs.130
The above case shows that the actual material consumed value in the production order is less than 80% of the planned materials. So, the system should not allow the GR to stores.
It should check only material cost only.
CAN ANY ONE SUGGEST ME ON THE ISSUE
Regards
Madan Mohan

Madan,
Try using the userexit in enhancement MBCF0002.
(A) Now the Planned cost can be calculated from the RESB table passing the Order no. For all the line items in RESB calculate the planned cost = Price * Qty.
(B) For actual costs take it from AUFM for mvt type 261. The fields DMBTR will give you the value. Sum for all line items.
Now suppose the GR bing done now is 5. This you will get in the user exit. In the exit check from CAUFV whta was the GR already posted. Say this is 2. So the total GR is 5 + 2 = 7.
Planned cost for 7 = (A) / Order Qty * 7
Actual cost = (B)
Compare planned and actual and give yr message,
rgds
ram

Different AP/AR Invoice Screen for Different Product

We have requirement that we want to capture
1. Different colums settings for different product.
2. Different UDF's for different product
We are not able to come up with common screen for AP/AR invoice for those product as it makes screen very complicated with many unnessary column for 1 product.
is it possible to have different screens for different products?

Hi Avinash,
You have go through the form settings for Raw level settings and UDF manage through create different category as per your product specification.
But As per SAP Standard not possible different form settings for different products in A/P and A/R forms.
for your requirement possible through SDK but thats not right way.
Thanks,
Srujal Patel

VF03 Profitability Analysis - Cost not capture in profitability

HI SAPFans,
I'm facing difficulty on profitability analysis on VF03.
The problem is, my cost of sales is not capture on Value fields tab (refer attachment).
[vf03|[IMG]http://i303.photobucket.com/albums/nn133/kerisnagasostro/vf03.jpg[/IMG]]
is there any maintenance that i need to check ? in order to flow cost amount into cost field on value fields tab ?

Dear
GOTO CONTROLLING Profitibility Analysis ---Flow of Acual Value --Transfer of Billing document --Assign value field --Maintain assignment of SD Condition to COPA -- OPERATING CONCERN(TYPE OF PROFITB ANALYSIS--SELECT COSTING BASED) AND CLICK. issue may arise to do this activity as that is FI Consultant job so u might not having require Authorization so need to take help of ur FI Consultant or asked ur Basis Consultant to give authoriztion.
Regards
AJIT K SINGH

CAPTURING OF COST IN PROFITABILITY ANALYSIS FOR BY PRODUCT

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for