Check in migo

Hi,
In my current business process, after doing Goods reciept against production order, I have to do settlement of order in KO88. then I have to do goods issue to project.
I want to give a check while doing goods issue to project that if the production order is not settled, system should not allow me to do goods issue to project.
How can this be achieved? what logic can be given? Please give your suggestions.
Regards.

Hi,
I have to do settlement of Production Order in KO88 and then do goods issue to project in MIGO.. I want to give a control that unless the order settlement is done, this goods issue to project in MIGO should not happen.
I just want to know which tables-fields I need to check? what changes to production order happens when order is settled? With this information I can think of some logic to create a user exit with abaper.
Is there any way I can also check how many production orders are yet to be settled??
Regards.

Similar Messages

Cenvat determination and vendor excise details are not checked in MIGO

Hi experts,
I have created one PO with Zero excise duty amounts (No excise duty) and following problem observed at the time of MIGO -
System doesnt check any vendor excise details (excise indicator marked as ZERO in j1ID) even without entering excise invoice No and date in MIGO system accepts the entry with ZERO excise duty amounts.
hence a fictitious part 1 No is generate by system for which no point taking part II.
Kindly suggest
Regards,
Pawan

Check SAP Note No 1282447- check vendor excise details in MIGO .
While capturing excise invoice along with the goods receipt process through
the transaction MIGO, the system does not validate the existence of the
excise details of the vendor master.
This note introduces the error 8I 565, 'Excise Details are not maintanied
for Vendor MIGO', when the vendor excise details are not maintained in
J1ID.
Raviraj.

Status check on MIGO while doing GR from PO

Hi Team,
How to remove/ deactivate status check maintained on MIGO while doing GR from PO
Thanks

Not sure exactly what is causing it but I doubt that this is an SAP problem.
The error message you are getting has only the word TEST in it and the message number starts with a Z. SAP doesn't start their message numbers with Z. It is used for customer objects. This tells me that the message you are seeing is a custom one someone in your company has created and is causing to display. Chances are it is being used in a user exit as part of development. If this is in your production system, I would say you have a problem as a TEST message like that shouldn't show up. It should either be a real message with additional information or it should have been removed before moving to production.
I would have a developer run this in debug. Chances are you'll find a user exit in use that is causing this.
FF

Check in MIGO for the excise tab

Hello Guru's,
We are trying to put the check for the Sub Transaction type in MIGO. As we capture and post Excise in MIGO itself.
We have tried but none of the Excise CIN exits are firing in the MIGO transaction.
Can anyone please suggest any BADI or exit which you have used for Excise and which fires in MIGO transaction.
Thanks in advance,
Sam

Hi
Check Below
MB_MIGO_BADI
MB_CIN_LMBMBU04
MB_CIN_MM07MFB7
MB_CIN_MM07MFB7_QTY
Regards
Edited by: Sachin on Oct 15, 2009 10:47 AM

Check in migo while gr raw material should equal with the challan materials

hi friends,
while doing gr in migo there should be a check for the raw material's which we are giving should match with challan materials. Here challan no is entered at the excise invoice tab- subcontracting challan level.
points will be rewarded,
thanks in advance ,
prasad.

Thanks for your kind reply,
But is there a way solve this problem?
And what is the use of leaving a field in the account assignment tab for an internal order while creating a PO and it will not take advantage of the settlement rule????????
And as you know the internal order settlement is a way to create a multiple account assignment
Can we solve the problem by making an automatic fake transaction that reverse the value of the GR/IR and creating another transaction can apply on it the settlement rule??
You know that settlement rule process is one of the best features in the SAP system it save time and effort to make distributions manually

Check while MIGO, to check document is attched through SERVICE FOR OBJECT

Hi,
While creating a document through MIGO,
I want to apply a check that during 101 movement type if document is not attached , system should throw a error message
'Attach document first'.
Is it possible ?
If yes , then through which progess BADI or user-exit ?

Hi
The authorization objects for attachment to material are as following:
Object Class BC_Z Basis - Central Functions
Authorization Object: S_BDS_DS
Authorizations for Document Set
Authorization Field ACTVT : 30
Authorization Field CLASSNAME:BUS1001
Authorization Field CLASSTYPE:BO
other ACTVT
01     Create or generate
02     Change
03     Display
04     Print, edit messages
05     Lock
06     Delete
24     Archive
25     Reload
30     Determine
70     Administer
78     Assign
82     Supplement
Note: That to be able to attach user should have MM02 authorization..
Best Regards
Hope it helps

We want to stop Budget AVC checks for MIGO & MIRO in Live System

HI Everyone.
We are using Funds Management (BCS) and at the inital stage we are checking the budget at PR, PO, GR & Invoice level.
Now, due to the functional constraints we've decided to remove the Budget AVC checks for GR (MIGO) and IR (MIRO)
Note: At the movement we are not using any activity groups w.r.t tolerance groups, bcoz if we specify the activity groups for only PR & PO, system wont check the budget at GR & IR but, system will post the negative values (FMB_PT01)
So, as a work around, we've defined derivation steps at business transaction level (RMWE & RMRP) by assigning commitment item which is having financial transaction 40 & commitment item type 3, where system wont check the budget.
But, system is not performing the derivation based on this rule in PRD, where with the same config system able to work properly as we desired in DEV client and able to bypass the MIGO & MIRO.
Can anyone, give some suggestions or best way to achieve the said requirement of avoiding the AVC check @ MIGO & MIRO level.
Thanks in Advance.
Raja Sekhar

Dear Mar,
I've maintained the Pre-development parameters in PRD and it is working fine as per my Derivation rule.
Can you tell me is there is similar kind of parameter, for service entry sheet also for the same purpose.
i've tried by maintaining parameter FLG_SES_OVERWRITE in FM01X, due to which in ML81N system taking the fund center as per the derivation, but when i am creating PO for services, system is not able to derive the fund center,
where as previously, before maintaining the above parameter, system use to derive the fund center based on cost center, which is not working after this maintainance.
Any suggestions on this.
Thanks for your support
Raja Talluri

Create serial no. automatically check activation -MIGO

In the MIGO transaction ,in the serial number tab want to activate the check box Create serial number automatically.Can you please advice what settings or where the config is ? IOS2 tcode settings are done for MMSL prodcedure but no result,is there any thing else or anywhere else the setting.
Edited by: mysap query on Dec 2, 2010 6:37 PM

Hello,
Please go to the customization for serial number profile and check which 'usage' you are defining.
For example, serial number usage 04 is not supported for serialization procedure
MMSL.
In addition, please check if you are manipulating the serial number creation via user exits EXIT_SAPLIPW1_008   or EXIT_SAPLIPW1_001. It could a reason to see a different behaviour in MIRO.
Basically the field GOITEM-XSAUT is presented if the material has a serial number profile determined into the material master and based on the configuration of this profile.
The flag 'Create Serial Nos Automatically' in transaction MIGO means that the serial numbers are being created when saving the goods receipt. The numbers of these serial numbers are not displayed upfront. You can find the serial numbers only afterwards when displaying the created material document.
I hope it helps you.
Regards,
Fábio Almeida
MM consultant

Serial number checks in MIGO

Hi,
I want to check the serial numbers at goods receiving.
At material 14741, 14751, 22643, 22644 serial numbers shall not be less than 3650.
We already use BADI MB_CHECK_LINE_BADI for some other checks. Unfortunately this BADI don't provide the entered serial numbers.
thx for your help!
Best regards, martin

Hi Martin,
Can you please give me a hint how did you enforce MIGO to execute this user exit?' Is it done by standard? I was trying for some time to put the hard berak point into the exit's include code, but in my case MIGO seem to not execute this exit...
Best regards,
Marcin

Commitment item for component check in MIGO

Hi All,
FM implemented. While doing Gi for the prod order and while checking for the component item ok.
I am facing the error No committment item entered in item 00000.
Please help how to do Gi.

Hi,
try entering commitment item in GL account.
Paolo

Re order point checking suring MIGO

Hello Gurus,
This is a unique requirment I have come across.
On posting the reservation ( MIGO - Goods Issue ), if the quantity has reached the reorder point after saving, it should display a message below, MATERIAL TO BE ORDERED.
For example:
Material code - 198345
Re order point in material master - 2
Stock before posting - 4
Reservation qty - 3
So once we do the posting, the stock will come down to 1. As this is below the re order point, display a message below, MATERIAL TO BE ORDERED.
Regards,
Narendra Bora

Narendra,
You need to work with a workflow expert to get this done in SAP. To my knowledge it is mostly possible in SAP, if not immediately after GI in MIGO.. the workflow can be triggered to MRP controller when the stock goes below re-order point.
You can post this requirment to ABAP team to get better response,
Regards,
Prasobh

Re-Order point check during MIGO

Hello Gurus,
This is a unique requirment I have come across.
On posting the reservation ( MIGO - Goods Issue ), if the quantity has reached the reorder point after saving, it should display a message below, MATERIAL TO BE ORDERED.
For example:
Material code - 198345
Re order point in material master - 2
Stock before posting - 4
Reservation qty - 3
So once we do the posting, the stock will come down to 1. As this is below the re order point, display a message below, MATERIAL TO BE ORDERED.
Regards,
Narendra Bora

Hi,
This is not possible in Standard SAP
Try with user exit MBCF0007 - Customer function exit: Updating a reservation

Payment budget not checked in MIGO against last years PO

We are using Former Budgeting. We have customised specific tolerance (OF23) to generate error message when budget exceeds 100% against payment budget. (not commitment budget).
Now we have a scenario: Purchase order was created in the last year. Good was received in the current year. There is no budget against the commitment item in the relevant fund center. I expect the system to throw error messsage and stop good receipt posting. However, system does not give any message and goods receipt is posted. I would like the system to stop processing of goods receipt.
Appreciate any help in this regard
Cheers
Raghuveer

Hello Ajay
Thanks for your reply. I could not get back in time since I was on holiday.
We do not carry specifically execute carry forward of PO commitments step (PMJ2). System automatically carry forward the commitment. Question is not about the commitment budget. We have configured the system to give error message only when the payment budget is exceeded not at the time commitment. Because the budgeting is done based on payments (actual receipt of goods).
For example:
Fund center budget : 2013 1000
2014 100
PO created in 2013 for 800.
Good receipt in 2013 for 600.
In 2014 good receipt done for 200 (remaning value of PO). I expect the system to give error message for payment budget since 200 is more than the budgeted amount of 100. However, no messages are issued and GR is posted.
Appreciate if you can throw some light on tis.
Thanks.
Cheers
Raghuveer

Reg: Item ok check box in MIGO

Hi All,
Could some one tel how / wer to make the item check in MIGO as mandatory in item tab .. In standard the it would be mandatory in detail data but while doing subcontracting the user is allowed to remove the check(tick mark ) in item column for the child material and it is allowing to post the document.
hope it is clear ....
if not i shall better clarity further
reg
AV

That means if you select it then it will be considered and of deselect then deleted that is nothing but Iten OK indicator only.
Input means optional entry that means it is up to user whether he wants to select indicator or not and required means user has to select it.
If it doesn't work then use t.code:SHD0 & proceed by entering MIGO Transaction Code.
Here activate Item OK indicator and make it display so user will not be able to change it in MIGO
Also you can use function in MIGO, click in menu Settings > Default Values
Here activate "Propose the Ok Function in Future", Item OK will get defaulted in MIGO everytime, user has not to activate it during MIGO.

In MIGO when I check the Quantity Tab - Amount in LC showing wrong amount

Hi Gurus,
I have a PO XXXX (Network related) for amount 15.063, When I check the MIGO Document in quantity Tab - Amount in LC field has updated with huge amount close to 2 lakhs.
Can you please tell me why this difference and one more thing PO, GR and IR are in INR Currency Only we are not using any other currency.
and Vendor Master also has been maintained in INR
Thanks
Vinay

Hi,
Check whether PO Price has been changed after Goods Receipt. Check in ME22N -> Environment --> Header Changes OR select the PO line item and click menu Environment --> Item Changes.
Also check if Delivery Cost/Freight Cost has been maintained in PO.

Check in migo

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for