Cost splitting with not-relevant activity types

Hi,
We have 10 activity types for splitting:
ZP01 - ZP10.
Everymonth the confirmation from process orders should be done only for ZP01 to ZP06. So, when we run KSS2, the activity independant cost will be split with these activity types.
For March 2009, user have done confirmation wrongly with activity types ZP07-ZP10. Once realized, user have reversed it.
When user run KSS2, the cost is split between ZP01-ZP10. When we check cost center report, there is no confirmation for ZP07-ZP10 anymore?
So, instead of splitting results USD 100/6, it has become USD100/10.
Does anyone faced this issue before? Any resolution?

Issue resolved.

Similar Messages

Restricting issue of goods to cost center with respect to material type

Dear Users,
I have a requirement like we want to restrict issue of goods to cost center with respect to material type i.e., we want to issue goods to cost center only through reservation and that too only for specific material types. Is there any standard solution for this, please provide your suggestions.
Thanks,
Manoj

Hi Ajay,
Thanks for valuable input.
I also thought in the same line , but user has the following concern on this:
Assessment Cycle: As per Users, it cannot be used because this will allocate based on allocation basis. But they need, the values that was posted at the time of transaction and as per materials. So it wont be accurate through Assessment cycle,
OKB9: They have different Cost center for different valuation area for the same GL Account.
Hence through OKB9 also, we cannot post directly to COPA.
That's the reason the above option were not adopted.
My other concern to this is:
In CKM3, we have two lines under consumption, one for Normal sales PGI and other is Cost Center.
After doing revaluation of consumption in CKMLCP, we see one line under Cost Center :Revaluation of Consumption Figure"
My question, where can I see that figure whether in any table or in Cost Center report??
If that is also available we can try to match those values and post to COPA.
Let me know your thought on this.
Thanks and regards
Kami

Hi, I have an issue with not receiving activation code for applications like whatsapp, icici bank imobile on iphone.. need help!

Hi, I use iphone 4 version 4.3.3 (8J2). I have downloaded my ICICI bank's application 'iphone imobile'. It asks for an activation code which it instructs to send a text message 'imobile iphone' to 5676766. I have done that umpteen times but problem is that i don't receive any reply. I have faced a similar problem while receiving activation code for another application 'Whatsapp', but fortunately Whatsapp gives an option of receiving activation code through alternate mode so i got the activation code through mail. Unfortunately ICICI Bank gives the activation code ONLY through a text message.
In this case there seems to be a problem with iPhone receiving activation code. Can anyone help me out here?
Amber Paintal
iphone 4 version 4.3.3 (8J2)

Hi, I use iphone 4 version 4.3.3 (8J2). I have downloaded my ICICI bank's application 'iphone imobile'. It asks for an activation code which it instructs to send a text message 'imobile iphone' to 5676766. I have done that umpteen times but problem is that i don't receive any reply. I have faced a similar problem while receiving activation code for another application 'Whatsapp', but fortunately Whatsapp gives an option of receiving activation code through alternate mode so i got the activation code through mail. Unfortunately ICICI Bank gives the activation code ONLY through a text message.
In this case there seems to be a problem with iPhone receiving activation code. Can anyone help me out here?
Amber Paintal
iphone 4 version 4.3.3 (8J2)

Material Cost Estimate with Qty Structure - Activity Cost

Hi All
While executing the Cost Roll up (CK11n) Im facing a peculiar problem . I have defined an activity for which the rates are also maintained in KP26 against the Basic UOM(eg for 1000 activity 10Rs is the variable price mentioned) . When Im taking the min lot size say 1 for the costing run the quantity appearing against this activity is appearing in the lower UOM (taking actual gms but the value for this activity is appearing in rupees only calculating from activity price x this figure). This is making the whole activity cost on very higher side .whereas If I execute with the same factors but with big lotsize say 1000 the value for the activity is coming absolutely ok .
Pls confirm me how to put a check on the value of activity or uom of activity to evaluate the standard costing with minimum lower size also
Best Regards
Manoj

Im closing this thread

Posting to Cost Center with SD statistic billing type

Dear All:
I'd like to know if it's possible to do statistic billing type documents sales from SD posting to Cost Center instead using CO-PA or profit center.
thanks in advance.
Sebastiá

Thank you, Waman. I'm going to read these notes.
regards,
Sebastian.

Cost implications with not migrating to Windows 8

What are the cost implications/client for not migrating from XP to windows 8?
I am working on an XP migration/HP hardware campaign and need to know if we get the question from potential customers. Any official cacluations on the cost implications for staying on XP ?

Hi,
Its a difficult one to calculate.
When dealing with an OS that is as old as XP, you must consider the following:
1. 3rd Party Hardware Vendors - Are your vendors of computers/laptops going to supply you with drivers compatible with XP and if so is there a fee involved?
2. 3rd Party Software Vendors - Are the suppliers of your business software going to support their applications on XP. Most do however some will require an extended or EOSL contract for this which means more cost.
3. RPO/RTO - Recovery Point/Time Objective - Older OS's will naturally be patched to an excessive level to get things running smooth. If you have a failure that halts productivity, how likely is it that you will have a restartable copy of XP up and running
to resume productivity. Calculate the loss based on downtime.
4. General Compatibility - Moving forward as technology does, will your XP system prevent you from upgrading to a new software product to improve productivity or reduce cost. I admit this is a difficult one to calculate but worth considering.
My main concerns with staying on XP is the cost of XP supported hardware and cost of support contracts. I have seen many hours lost messing with driver packages to get XP to recognize a chipset or LAN adapter on a new workstation.
Hope this helps,
Regards,
M
If you find my information useful, please rate it. :-)

Payment of Subcription done with not yet active

HI, I have made the payment of My Order no ****************084 on 18th July but on my account the minutes are still zero. Please renew my subscription. Thanks

Hello and welcome to the Skype Community.
Your account shows that you have used your full minutes allocation in your current billing cycle and your next minutes will be added to your account when your next billing cycle starts on July 22nd 2015.
Renewing your monthly Subscription before your billing cycle ends has no effect on the date upon which your minutes allocation will be added to your account.
To continue calling until your next minutes allocation is applied to your account please purchase either a Subscription but with a different amount of minutes or Skype Credit.

Data associated with Activity Type field in Costing transaction KP26.......

Hi,
In what table can I find relation between the Plan Activity and Distribution Key data assciated with a Activity Type field in Costing transaction KP26.
Please help.
Regards,
Rajesh.

HI,
Please check these notes.
86613
688883 Confirmation with price 0: Message BK057
645811 Confirmation with plan price 0: No costs in CO
Plese assign points if it useful.
Regards
Ravinagh Boni

Activity Type with cost elements

Hi,
I'm trying to find out whether it is possible to connect activity types with a group or range of cost elements, which should be allocated using activity allocation.
I don't want to allocate all costs gathered on Cost Center, but only a range of cost elements. Can I achieve that using direct activity allocation and if it's possible, how can I do it?
Best wishes,
Karol

Hi Karol,
It is possible to link the cost elements to the activity using the splitting structure in the SPRO of cost center accounting.
First the costs are debited to other cost centers using the plan activity type. At the end of the period when you calculate the actual price of the activity then based on the cost element range assigned to the activity in the splitting structure the actual cost of the cost elements are debited through the activity.
I hope it is clear now.
Regards,
Suraj

Activity Type: cost element does not exist

Dear All,
I am working on ERP configuration for PP module as an academic exercise. I am already through with FI, CO and MM modules.
I am not able to get through the Activity assignment step in PP module. (Accounting u21D2 Controlling u21D2 Cost Center Accounting u21D2 Master Data u21D2 Activity Type u21D2 Individual Processing u21D2 Create). While creating activity type labor (labor hours), I am getting error "cost element does not exist for aggregated period"
In CO module I have created primary cost element for "Labor"(Category: primary cost/ cost reducing revenues). Also created secondary cost element for labor (cost element category: Internal activity allocation).
Can anybody guide me on how to go further?
regards,
Supriya

Dear
Please revivew the following steps when you are creating a New Acvity type :
OP51 - Check Settings for formulas
OP54 - Check formulas for Costing
Ensure that usage of the parameters are indicated. Some parameters are appropriate for capacity calculation but not for schedule calculation. If you like to find out the parameter id, you could use the Search Fld. for Param. pull down button to do so.
KLH2 - Maintain hierarchy of Activity type group.
OP19 - Define standard value key
The purpose of standard value keys is to group together a set of parameters for the purpose of ensuring that the standard values for the parameters are supplied in the operations of the routing. This is so that the formula (for calculating cost, schedule, and capacity) could have the necessary figures to work with. Once the parameters are associated with the standard value keys, work centers quoting this standard values will be able to dictate whether or not the parameter values are optional or mandatory entry in the operations of the routing. The pre-requisite for using this transaction is that the parameters must have been pre-created.
KA01 - Create Primary Cost Element for the new activities type. Maintain Correct From and To date inline with Activity Type KL01 - Create Activity Type tied to the primary cost element. (the Cost element field)
KP26 - Change Activity Type/Activity Price Planning - maintain the Variable price
If the user include the additional activities in their work center, the routing that used the work center will required more time to finished the jobs.
The operations Start and Finish date will be extended due to the extra time spent on the work center. The cost of production increases in line with the extra activity which will be reflected in the Factory Output when you do a cost analysis in the production order. The new activity will have a price attached to it and the moving average price will increase.
Regards
JH

How to Create New Activity Type for Assiged to work centre Costing in Acti

Dear Sir,
We have four activity type to assigned in workcentre Costing Activity. Details are as under
AIRJET     2010     AIRJET
DONIER     2010     DORNIER
SULTEX     2010     SULTEX
SULZER     2010     SULZER
in addition one more loom is comming in our unit and require new activity type.
How can i create new.
Please guide.
Thanks in advance
Regards
Ajit

Dear ,
To create new Activity Type , you need to follow the below steps :
KA01 - Create Primary Cost Element for the new activities type.
KL01 - Create Activity Type tied to the primary cost element.
KP26 - Change Activity Type/Activity Price Planning - maintain the Variable price
Assign the activity type to cost center using T code KP26.
In the input screen of T code KP26 ,enter version as 0, from period 1 and to period as 12 and the Fiscal Year as 20xx.
Click on Overview tab on top and key in costing details in this screen.
After performing this ,while creating the work center ,this combination of activity type & cost center should be assigned.
At work centre level , you should have
1.Create Standrad Value Key -OP19 and Formula Key in OP49.
2.Create Formula Parameters in OP7B or u can use existing one to assing in the Standard Value Key
3.In CR02-Assing the Standard value key in Basic Data and select the Formula Key in Costing tab with cost centre assingement .Save
Try and check
Regards
JH

Update cost - activity type

Hi forum
I did confirmations in maintenance orders, but it was not the activity type to date. I have maintained the activity type in kp26 but the costs of the previous confirmations in the orders are not updated.
Could you help me to make it possible.
Best regards.

Hi,
If u have maintained cost for Activity type - Cost Center in KP26 then for earlier confirmation - try to cancel that confirmation using IW45 & again do confirmation via IW41 .. /i believe in this way it should udpate the costs ..
regards
pushpa

Activity Independent Costs -Splitting Equally

Dear All,
When I try to split the Activity Independent Costs among various activity types ,Independent costs are being splitted equally among the activity types,even though I have selected splitting method as 12 (i.e. Activity Quantity) while configuring the splitting structure.
Actually the system should have splitted the independent costs based on Activity qty instead of splitting the costs equally.
Please help me out as how get the splitting of costs based activity qty.
Regards
Su

Hi
Your splitting structure has 2 parts
1. Where in you define rule.. here you defined rule based on 012 (Qct Qty)
2. You create Assignments and assign your splitting rule here... I hope you have assigned the splitting rule here in the assignments
3. I hope the fiscal year from which you assigned cost centers to splitting rule in OKEW is also in line
4. Also check if you defined your target cost version in case you are doing splitting based on actual cost (KSS2)
5. Also, in splitting rule, I hope you have assigned a cost element group containing all your cost elements to this group and also your activity types between whom the costs are to be split up (In the tab "Selection for assignment)"
Once you do this, activity indep costs split based on act qty only... (KSS2/KSS4)...
Regards
Ajay M

CO Cost apportionment and cost allocation (on activity type)

Hi
I have created cycles and allocated costs to cost centers on basis of activity types. I have used TCode KP26 for the actual costs. Same way, i created SKFs and cycles for the cost apportionment for actual costs.
Now i want to run these allocation cycles and cost apportionment for planned values... Is it possible in SAP, if yes, please let me know how these cycles will created and executed for planned costs.
Edited by: Meenu_ND on Feb 15, 2011 10:49 AM

hi..Meenu
   Probably you want to allocate plan values through Assessment cycle. Pl process as per steps below :
   a) Creat Assessment Cost Element Cat 42 in T.Cd KA01
b) Plan Expenses under primar cost element in KP26
   c) Plan Activity qty in KP06
d) Plan SKF in KP46
   d) Creat Plan Assessment cycle in KSU7. While creating your tracing factor Receiver rule select as per your requirement
e) Execute plan assessment cycle T.code KSUB
     Revert back for any help

Actual cost splitting - secondary cost element

Hi All,
My knowledge on actual cost splitting for cost centers are limited.
Basically i am trying to use actual activity price calculation. In my splitting structure i have two different cost element group for two activities and i am using splitting rule 30 i.e., activity quantity. The system does the splitting perfectly based on the cost elements groups specified in splitting structure, but i am facing a strange problem. i have also allocated costs from different cost center to the prod cost center used for price calculation through assessment. But i havent used the secondary cost element in none of the cost element group for activities, but still the system is taking the cost of the allocated costs in secordary cost elements and allocates to both the activities in 50:50, which i am able to see in splitting showing as "division of activity-independed actual costs".
Can anybody please let me know, is this the way it works or something has gone wrong.
Thanks
With Best Regards,
GJ

Portion of http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/5b/d2200743c611d182b30000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
".....the actual costs are distributed on the activity types according to splitting rules. If you have not defined any splitting rules for a cost center, the R/3 System splits actual costs based on the equivalence numbers for the activity types. "
Your case could construed to be a missing splitting rule, because the cost element group is missing the secondary cost element within the splitting structure. As a result, the system may use the equivalence number of the activity types and distribute.
Check the equivalence number of your two activities, it may be 1 and 1 for both activities; hence those costs getting divided equally. I suspect nothing has gone wrong.

Cost splitting with not-relevant activity types

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for