Creation of Approval process folder in KM

Hi,
I have created a folder in KM content for the approval process under the document directory. The approval process, the notifications in UWL, emails everythign works fine. I then created a 'KM content navigation iview' for displaying this particular folder. Now the problem is I dot get the 'Submit for Approval " menu item in this iview. This menu item is normally under Selection->Approval->Submit for Approval in the KM content view.
Any ideas on how to get this done ?
All I need to do is to create a folder for approval process so that the users can create any document and submit for approval. I want this folder to be displayed via an iview where the user can submit for approval process.
Thanks
Sheril

HiParam,
I worked on a similar thing.
You just have to choos ethe right layout set for ur iview.
Modify the AdminExplorer Layout set.In AdminCollectionListRenderer choose StatemanagementMassGroup as the Mass command group.
Go to Iview 's properties and change the layout set to ur's new customised one.
I hope u know how to modify the layout set.
I hope it helps.
Regards,
Sumit

Similar Messages

  • Template Folder for Approval Process in KM Repository

    Hi,
    I have the following scenario:
    There is a Folder that has been set up with an approval step and approvers.
    What i need to do is to copy this folder to another location in the same repository and the approval process.
    For example:
    In the folder /documents/Sales/ApprovalTemplate/ is defined the following step:
    STEP: Content Validation
    Approvers: salesApproverGroup
    I create a new folder: /documents/Sales/Presentations
    Inside that folder I want to copy the folder /documents/Sales/ApprovalTemplate/. That's no problem. But when the folder is copied here: /documents/Sales/Presentations/ApprovalTemplate/ it has no more approval steps neither approvers. Whatsmore, the approval process isn't enabled.
    Is there any way to manage to copy folders and copy approval process?
    Thanks in advance!
    Nicolas

    Hello Nicolas,
    There is no standard way of transporting an approval process, see the following threads which discuss the same topic:
    http://forums.sdn.sap.com/thread.jspa?messageID=1162799#1162799
    http://forums.sdn.sap.com/thread.jspa?messageID=7513708#7513708
    Regards,
    Lorcan.

  • Approval process creation steps using JDeveloper in OIM 11g R2

    Hi,
    Please help me to create approval process creation using JDeveloper and how to use the approval process in OIM provision in OIM 11g R2.
    Thanks in Advace,
    srini

    refer developer's guide to get the detailed steps. http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E27559_01/dev.1112/e27150/request.htm#BABFFJDH
    Also refer OBE tutorial http://www.oracle.com/webfolder/technetwork/tutorials/obe/fmw/oim/oim_11g/Custom_Approval_Process_for_Resource_Request/custom_approval_process_for_resource_provision.htm#t3
    There will be slight changes in the steps as this OBE is for 11gR1.
    High level steps:
    Create a new application using the following command
    ant -f <OIM_HOME>/server/workflows/new-workflow/new_project.xml.
    It will be created in OIM_HOME/workflows/new-workflow/process-template/ directory
    Openthe .jws file in jdeveloper and edit the default human task and add whatever logic is needed.
    Then deploy the composite after which you need to create an approval policy and link the SOA composite created
    Edited by: Durgaprasad on Apr 24, 2013 1:55 AM

  • APPROVAL PROCESS WORK FLOW

    Hi,
    I have already set the approval process, in which I have a user that authorizes and the one that publishes.
    The ContentCreator is supponsed to create documents that need to be authorized and published in order to be seen. But what happens when the Content Creator happens to create a new folder and a new document in that folder? That new folder does not inheritate the approval process, and so the new document in that folder is automatically published, invalidating the approval process.
    How can I avoid that mistake? Ho can I limit the creation of new folders just for the administrator?
    Thanx

    Hi
    Thanks for your response.
    I am able to approve the Manual PO created.
    I have created the requisition using custom program (which calls requisition import) and took that requisition and using AutoCreate created the PO, it comes to Approved status.
    Its going to Pre-Approved if I call PO_INTERFACE_S.CREATE_DOCUMENTS.
    Then I am calling the following procs to approve it. Please chk it and let me know.
    PO_REQAPPROVAL_INIT1.Start_WF_Process ( ItemType => ItemType,
                        ItemKey => ItemKey,                     WorkflowProcess => WorkflowProcess,
              ActionOriginatedFrom => L_ActionOriginatedFrom,
                        DocumentID => DocumentID,
                   DocumentNumber => DocumentNumber,
                        PreparerID => PreparerID,
                   DocumentTypeCode => DocumentTypeCode,
                   DocumentSubtype => DocumentSubtype,
                   SubmitterAction => L_RequestorAction,
                   forwardToID => nvl(forwardToID,PreparerID),
                   forwardFromID => forwardFromID,
                   DefaultApprovalPathID => DefaultApprovalPathID,
                        Note => DocumentNote,
                        printFlag => print_check );
    apps.PO_REQAPPROVAL_ACTION.Approve_doc(itemtype => ItemType
    ,itemkey =>Itemkey
    ,actid => null
    ,funcmode => wf_engine.eng_run
    ,resultout => l_approve_message);
    Thanks in advance,
    Shabbeer

  • Approved invoices can not be edited  - Approval process

    Hi Experts -
    I have recently raised an incident with SAP about Approval process - the complete message and support reply is as follows - but i believe we need a change in the approval process - if the approval required is only one but you have defined two people (Either or OR) in the approver list - the system should allow the document to be edited if one of the approvers reject it.
    please let me know and i believe we need  a change in design - unless otherwise a solid reason is given to justify the existing design
    10.07.2009 10:32 Description (English) by SRS Manian
         We have created approval procedure for all the invoices which are entered into the system., The
    'Accts' user enters the invoice into the system - the invoice comes for approval to 'Manager' user.
    When the Manager opens the invoice via Alert window - he/she wants to modify certain information
    (lines as well as Sales person) and approve it.
    The invoice which gets opened from the alert window - does not allow the user 'Manager' to modify at
    all. All the information on the invoice are greyed out.
    The system should allow the user 'Manager' to modify the information. Since the manager has full
    authorization to the system.
    10.07.2009 10:35 Info to Reporter by SAP
         Dear Partner/Customer,
    We have received your inquiry and are currently processing it.
    You will be contacted with a solution or an update as soon as possible.
    For further details regarding the phase your message is in at the
    moment please refer to:
    http://service.sap.com/%7Esapidb/011000358700000575782007E
    Kind regards,
    SAP Business One Product Support
    10.07.2009 10:59 Reply to Reporter by SAP
         Dear Manian,
    Thank you for contacting us.
    When the originator sends the document for manager's approval, note that the at that stage, the document is still in the 'Approval Process'. This is because the system is waiting for the 'Manager' to 'Approve or Reject' the document. Hence, looking at the Document, it is still in 'Draft - Pending' Status.
    When the document is in 'Draft-Pending' Status, the document is not available for editing, because the system considers that it is still in the waiting process. In your case, the manager cannot edit t he document.
    To amend the document, an action is required from the approver either to reject it first. Once rejected, it can be amended and re-sent for approval.
    I have checked our knowledge base and noted that there is an article which describes the approval process. Please refer to the Expert on Phone Wiki Article (March 2009) with title: Why a draft documen t in an approval process cannot be modified by the originator?
    The link will provide the explanation:
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/wiki?path=/pages/viewpage.action&pageid=88735894
    I have also attached Notes 1321234 and 1111431 for your reference.
    Best regards,
    Lorna Real
    Support Consultant
    Product Support for SAP Business One
    SAP Ireland 
    10.07.2009 11:59 Reply to Support Center  by SRS Manian
         Thanks for the reply. The scenario is when the Manager receives the
    document for approval, he wanted to edit and add it. Your reply (and
    documentations) states that it needs to be rejected first before it is
    available for editing. When it is gets rejected - the person who
    orignated the document gets an alert and he can edit it. Here the
    Manager must get an alert so that he can edit the Rejected document.
    When the 'manager' rejects the document, and goes back to the alert
    window to open the document - it is still greyed out !!
    How does the 'manager' reject the document and edits it ?
    regards
    Manian 
    10.07.2009 12:11 Reply to Reporter by SAP
         Dear Manian,
    If after the Manager rejects it and still the document is not editable (greyed out), it means that the document may still be in the 'Approval Process'. When it is greyed out, what is the status of the document in the header? Does it say 'Rejected' or 'Pending'?
    If it is still in 'Pending' mode, please verify the number of 'Approvers' set in the 'Stages' tab of the 'Approval Template - Setup' window. If there is more than one user listed as 'Approver', and o nly 1 approval is required, the system provides an opportunity to other 'Approvers' to approve or reject the document. If in your case, the number of approvers is 2, and manager 'rejected' it, the sys tem still keeps the document in Pending status as it waits for another approver's decision to reject or approve it.
    Also, verify the number of 'Approvals' required. If the number of 'Approvers' who have not rendered their decision is greater than or equal to the 'Approvals' required (e.g. approvers - 2, required ap provals - 2) the system keeps the document within the approval process. This is to allow the other 'Approvers' to decide on the document.
    I hope this clarifies the behaviour. If you can provide us a step by step screenshot of the issue, this may help us to provide a more accurate response.
    Best regards,
    Lorna Real
    Support Consultant
    Product Support for SAP Business One
    SAP Ireland 
    10.07.2009 12:28 Reply to Support Center  by SRS Manian
         Hi:
    The status of the document in the Header says 'Pending' and the status
    below the document number says 'Suspended' - it is not showing as 'Draft'
    Regards
    Manian 
    10.07.2009 12:42 Call to Customer / Partner by SAP
         Performed on: 10.07.2009 10:41:59 (UK)
    Contact person: SRS Manian
    Status of discussion: Customer not reached
    Subject:
    Called the partner but currently engaged on another line.
    Would like to hold a webex. 
    10.07.2009 12:42 Reply to Reporter by SAP
         Dear Manian,
    I'm trying to call you but there was no response on your mobile.
    When the header says 'Pending', then it means the document is still within the approval process. Please check the Approval Template and see the number of approvers and the number of approvals require d.
    The number of approvals and approvers may be greater than 1. In this case, the system waits for other approvers to approve or reject the document. Once all the approvers have rejected the document, th en the document will be released and available for editing.
    Best regards,
    Lorna Real
    Support Consultant
    Product Support for SAP Business One
    SAP Ireland 
    10.07.2009 18:11 Reply to Support Center  by SRS Manian
         Hi:
    Thanks for the reply - i tried this and found out the following:
    1 - In the approval templates - we had mentioned number of approvals
    required as '1'.
    2 - in the number of approvers - we had mentioned two users
    Though the template requires only one approvals (Either or OR) the system
    expects both of them to approve or reject -
    Can u please let me why is this behaving like this - or is this is the
    way it is designed ? - if this is the way it is designed - i beleive it
    is wrong - weneed to give a solution to the customer
    regards
    Manian 
    11.07.2009 05:52 Reply to Reporter by SAP
         Dear Manian,
    Thank you for the information. The behaviour is a current system definition documented as per Note 1321234. I have attached the said Note for your reference. When only 1 approval is required and there are 2 or more persons are allowed to approve the document, the document does not get automatically rejected when 1 person 'rejects' it. The system waits for other approvers to render their decision b ecause a person may still approve or reject the document.
    The design is not an application error. If you would like to change this design, please post your requirement in our SAP Business One Product Development Collaboration
    forum. You can find the forum in this link:
    /community [original link is broken]
    The forum is beingmoderated by members of the Solution Management team specialized in certain areas, according to the folder you are in. Partners can impact the design of specific features by posting suggestions and feedback at this forum. Kindly refer to Note 1028874 which describes more on the above process.
    As the request will be handled through another process, we kindly request that this support message be closed.
    Thank you for your understanding.
    Best regards,
    Lorna Real
    Support Consultant
    SAP Product Support for SAP Business One
    SAP Ireland 
    11.07.2009 09:02 Reply to Support Center  by SRS Manian
         Hi Thanks for the reply - however, the solution given doesnot address the
    problem we are beingfaced with our client
    Is there a Development Request we can raise so that this problem is
    addressed in future
    I am going ahead and confirming this Message though
    regards
    Manian 
    11.07.2009 10:04 Reply to Reporter by SAP
         Dear Manian,
    Thanks for the information. I understand the customer's requirement. As previously mentioned, please log a development request in this link:
    /community [original link is broken] This is from Note 1028874.
    Unfortunately,we at the support centre does not have access to the list of development requests. Hence, kindly follow the process in Note 1028874.
    I'm sending the message back to your side for confirmation.
    Best regards,
    Lorna Real
    Support Consultant
    Product Support for SAP Business One
    SAP Ireland 
    SAP Notes           
    Number     Short text
    0001035200
    Issue can be solved via existing documentation
    0001111431
    Deleting rejected draft documents.
    0001167635
    Maintenance Policy (L)
    0001321234
    Status of a document rejected within the Approval Process.

    Hi Gordon - thanks for the reply - i am sorry i never realized that the message i raised could be messed up like this - the following is a clear message with some paragraphs:
    Hi Experts - I have recently raised an incident with SAP about Approval process - the complete message and support reply is as follows - but i believe we need a change in the approval process - if the approval required is only one but you have defined two people (Either or OR) in the approver list - the system should allow the document to be edited if one of the approvers reject it. please let me know and i believe we need a change in design - unless otherwise a solid reason is given to justify the existing design
    SRS Manian We have created approval procedure for all the invoices which are entered into the system., The 'Accts' user enters the invoice into the system - the invoice comes for approval to 'Manager' user. When the Manager opens the invoice via Alert window - he/she wants to modify certain information (lines as well as Sales person) and approve it. The invoice which gets opened from the alert window - does not allow the user 'Manager' to modify at all. All the information on the invoice are greyed out. The system should allow the user 'Manager' to modify the information. Since the manager has full authorization to the system.
    Reply to Reporter by SAP Dear Manian,
    Thank you for contacting us. When the originator sends the document for manager's approval, note that the at that stage, the document is still in the 'Approval Process'. This is because the system is waiting for the 'Manager' to 'Approve or Reject' the document. Hence, looking at the Document, it is still in 'Draft - Pending' Status. When the document is in 'Draft-Pending' Status, the document is not available for editing, because the system considers that it is still in the waiting process. In your case, the manager cannot edit t he document. To amend the document, an action is required from the approver either to reject it first. Once rejected, it can be amended and re-sent for approval. I have checked our knowledge base and noted that there is an article which describes the approval process. Please refer to the Expert on Phone Wiki Article (March 2009) with title: Why a draft documen t in an approval process cannot be modified by the originator? The link will provide the explanation:
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/wiki?path=/pages/viewpage.action&pageid=88735894
    I have also attached Notes 1321234 and 1111431 for your reference. Best regards, Lorna Real Support Consultant Product Support for SAP Business One SAP Ireland 10.07.2009 11:59
    Reply to Support Center by SRS Manian
    Thanks for the reply.
    The scenario is when the Manager receives the document for approval, he wanted to edit and add it. Your reply (and documentations) states that it needs to be rejected first before it is available for editing. When it is gets rejected - the person who orignated the document gets an alert and he can edit it. Here the Manager must get an alert so that he can edit the Rejected document. When the 'manager' rejects the document, and goes back to the alert window to open the document - it is still greyed out !! How does the 'manager' reject the document and edits it ? regards Manian
    Reply to Reporter by SAP
    Dear Manian, If after the Manager rejects it and still the document is not editable (greyed out), it means that the document may still be in the 'Approval Process'. When it is greyed out, what is the status of the document in the header? Does it say 'Rejected' or 'Pending'? If it is still in 'Pending' mode, please verify the number of 'Approvers' set in the 'Stages' tab of the 'Approval Template - Setup' window. If there is more than one user listed as 'Approver', and o nly 1 approval is required, the system provides an opportunity to other 'Approvers' to approve or reject the document. If in your case, the number of approvers is 2, and manager 'rejected' it, the sys tem still keeps the document in Pending status as it waits for another approver's decision to reject or approve it. Also, verify the number of 'Approvals' required. If the number of 'Approvers' who have not rendered their decision is greater than or equal to the 'Approvals' required (e.g. approvers - 2, required ap provals - 2) the system keeps the document within the approval process. This is to allow the other 'Approvers' to decide on the document. I hope this clarifies the behaviour. If you can provide us a step by step screenshot of the issue, this may help us to provide a more accurate response.
    Best regards,
    Lorna Real Support Consultant Product Support for SAP Business One SAP Ireland
    Reply to Support Center by SRS Manian
    Hi: The status of the document in the Header says 'Pending' and the status below the document number says 'Suspended' - it is not showing as 'Draft'
    Regards
    Manian 10.07.2009 12:42
    Reply to Reporter by SAP
    Dear Manian,
    I'm trying to call you but there was no response on your mobile. When the header says 'Pending', then it means the document is still within the approval process. Please check the Approval Template and see the number of approvers and the number of approvals require d. The number of approvals and approvers may be greater than 1. In this case, the system waits for other approvers to approve or reject the document. Once all the approvers have rejected the document, th en the document will be released and available for editing.
    Best regards,
    Lorna Real Support Consultant Product Support for SAP Business One SAP Ireland
    Reply to Support Center by SRS Manian
    Hi: Thanks for the reply - i tried this and found out the following: 1 - In the approval templates - we had mentioned number of approvals required as '1'. 2 - in the number of approvers - we had mentioned two users Though the template requires only one approvals (Either or OR) the system expects both of them to approve or reject - Can u please let me why is this behaving like this - or is this is the way it is designed ? - if this is the way it is designed - i beleive it is wrong - weneed to give a solution to the customer
    regards
    Manian
    Reply to Reporter by SAP
    Dear Manian,
    Thank you for the information. The behaviour is a current system definition documented as per Note 1321234. I have attached the said Note for your reference. When only 1 approval is required and there are 2 or more persons are allowed to approve the document, the document does not get automatically rejected when 1 person 'rejects' it. The system waits for other approvers to render their decision because a person may still approve or reject the document.
    The design is not an application error. If you would like to change this design, please post your requirement in our SAP Business One Product  Development Collaboration forum.
    You can find the forum in this link:
    /community [original link is broken]
    The forum is being moderated by members of the Solution Management team specialized in certain areas, according to the folder you are in. Partners can impact the design of specific features by posting suggestions and feedback at this forum.
    Kindly refer to Note 1028874 which describes more on the above process.
    As the request will be handled through another process, we kindly request that this support message be closed. Thank you for your understanding.
    Best regards,
    Lorna Real Support Consultant SAP Product Support for SAP Business One SAP Ireland
    Reply to Support Center by SRS Manian
    Hi Thanks for the reply - however, the solution given does not address the problem we are being faced with our client Is there a Development Request we can raise so that this problem is addressed in future I am going ahead and confirming this Message though
    regards
    Manian
    Reply to Reporter by SAP Dear Manian,
    Thanks for the information. I understand the customer's requirement. As previously mentioned, please log a development request in this link:
    /community [original link is broken]
    This is from Note 1028874.
    Unfortunately, we at the support centre does not have access to the list of development requests. Hence, kindly follow the process in Note 1028874. I'm sending the message back to your side for confirmation.
    Best regards,
    Lorna Real Support Consultant Product Support for SAP Business One SAP Ireland

  • Approval process monitor status turn to "Initiated" instead of "Pending", so awe is not routed

    When I submit a transaction, after successful submission in approval process monitor the status has turn "Initiated" instead of "Pending". That's why it's showing "Not Routed" for the next approving person. So that worklist is not populated.
    Please suggest me to resolve this issue.
    Process Monitor as follows after submission:
    Separation Approval Process (Stage)
    Initiated (Monitor status)
    Approval Routing from Unit HR (Path)
    Not Routed    (Step)                                                    Not Routed      (Step)
    Multiple Approvers                                                     Multiple Approvers
    STATEHR ROLEUSER SEPARATION                              Central Hr
    (Userlist)                                                                        (Userlist)

    Looking at the error message "The Network Adapter could not establish the connection" , It appears hostname and port may be incorrect. Review the targets.xml under E:\oracle\product\10.2.0\db_1\SAP_solman_SDB\emd and
    emoms.properties under E:\oracle\product\10.2.0\db_1\SAP_solman_SDB\config folder to make sure host ( sap_solman) and port (1527) are correct.
    As far as setting the environment variables goes, you can go to control panel -> system -> advanced -> environment variables and set the ORACLE_HOME and ORACLE_SID
    -Ramesh

  • Web Page Composer (WPC) – Web page - Approval process

    We have requirement with our web publishing environment where we want to stage the web pages for review before they are published for public. Currently, if you develop a web page in Web Page Composer ( WPC ) and click publish to review the content/layout. The page is published for public and included in TRex and can be searchable.
    We thought KM Approval process will help resolve this issue. The approval process work very well with the u2018Site Contentu2019 where once author develop the content (article, paragraph etc.) and submit for approval in this case Editor (role). The content under site content folder is not published (not available for public) until approved by Editor.
    This same approval process does not work on the Web Page folder. We have exactly same permission/ Service permission setup on the Web Page folder. Even though the u2018Approvalu2019 is turned on the Web Page folder it does not inherit the same to new web pages created or existing web pages in that folder. If we go and turn on the u2018Approvalu2019 on a page then we see a u2018Approvalu2019 button in WPC but when you submit the page for approval it pops up another screen with below message.
    Confirm that you want to publish the page. A new version of the homepage will be created and, if appropriate, submitted for approval. Changes to pages not subject to approval are active immediately.
    When you confirm this message nothing happens (no workflow kicks off).
    I would like to hear if any one has tried the approval process on WPC web pages. If you are not using this process how you are staging the web page for review before publishing to public.
    Thanks.

    Hi Bertina,
    We encountered the same problem couple days back in our environment. There is a SAP note (# 1294833) which details the issue but affected version indicated in this note is different then what we are on so we decided to create a note for SAP.
    Below is SAP response for this issues
    13.09.2010 - 08:52:12 CET - Reply by SAP     
    Dear customer,
    I can confirm that the issue described in SAP Note 1294833 is indeed
    present in EP 7.01 SP4 and is the reason you are currently experiencing
    this problem.
    Unfortunately, as outlined in the note, there is no workaround
    available but our developers have advised me that the fix will be
    included in the next patch for KMC WEB PAGE COMPOSER 7.01 SP04.
    Hope this helps.

  • API for Document Status in a Approval Process

    Hi All,
    I wanted to know how to get the status of a document that is in a folder having a Approval Process defined to it & Is it possible to programatically Submit a document for Approval. If yes please let me know..
    Thanks in Advance.
    Regards,
    Aditya Metukul

    Hi Detlev,
    You are simply gr8..it worked...
    below is the  code snippet  written by me:
          void submitResource(IResource resource){
                   try {
                             //get the statemanagement service from the resource
                             IRepositoryServiceFactory factory = ResourceFactory.getInstance().getServiceFactory();
                             IStatemanagementManager statemanagement =
                             (IStatemanagementManager)factory.getRepositoryService(resource, IWcmConst.STATEMANAGEMENT_SERVICE);
                             IStatemanagementResource sResource =
                             statemanagement.getStatemangementResource(resource);
                             IResourceTransition transition = sResource.getTransition("lbl.submit");
                             //if everything is correct than transition is not null
                             if (transition != null) transition.execute();
                   } catch (Exception e) {
         } //end of submitResource
    Message was edited by: aditya metukul

  • PO not created automatically after creation and approval of SC

    Hi all,
    We are using SRM7.0 Extended Classic Scenario.
    We are able to create Shopping Cart successfully.
    For items where a source of supply is not supplied, the Shopping Cart goes through the approval process and then into the sourcing Cockpit.
    But for the other Shopping Carts, PO is not getting created automatically after the approval of SC.
    Any ideas/suggestions on this issue would be highly helpful.
    Thanks,
    Priya

    Priya,
    Can you check this configuration in Sourcing  for particular PCat?
    *Automatic requirement grouping; sourcing for items without assigned*
    source of supply:
    Then run the report BBP_SC_TRANSFER_GROUPED which will  automatically group requirements together for
    the creation of a PO.
    And,  If the requirement does not have a source of supply, it appears in the work list of the sourcing application for manual assignment. Once you have assigned a source of supply, you can submit the requirement to the report.
    Let us know if it works, and should help you this one.
    Thanks,
    Rahul Mandale

  • Exception while setting up approval process

    Hi ,
       When I enable the approval process I get the following error .
    java.lang.ClassCastException
            at com.sapportals.wcm.control.statemanagement.ApproverControl.isPermissionSet(ApproverControl.java:1620)
            at com.sapportals.wcm.control.statemanagement.ApproverControl.getPermissionWarnString(ApproverControl.java:1603)
            at com.sapportals.wcm.control.statemanagement.ApproverControl.renderAclWarning(ApproverControl.java:1590)
            at com.sapportals.wcm.control.statemanagement.ApproverControl.renderControl(ApproverControl.java:1105)
            at com.sapportals.wcm.control.statemanagement.ApproverControl.render(ApproverControl.java:414)
            at com.sapportals.wcm.control.statemanagement.ApproverCompositeControl.render(ApproverCompositeControl.java:126)
            at com.sapportals.wdf.layout.HorizontalLayout.renderControls(HorizontalLayout.java:42)
            at com.sapportals.wdf.stack.Pane.render(Pane.java:155)
            at com.sapportals.wdf.stack.PaneStack.render(PaneStack.java:67)
            at com.sapportals.wdf.layout.HorizontalLayout.renderPanes(HorizontalLayout.java:73)
            at com.sapportals.wdf.stack.Pane.render(Pane.java:158)
            at com.sapportals.wdf.stack.PaneStack.render(PaneStack.java:67)
            at com.sapportals.wdf.layout.HorizontalLayout.renderPanes(HorizontalLayout.java:73)
            at com.sapportals.wcm.control.layout.HorizontalGroupLayout.renderPanes(HorizontalGroupLayout.java:49)
            at com.sapportals.wdf.stack.Pane.render(Pane.java:158)
            at com.sapportals.wdf.stack.PaneStack.render(PaneStack.java:67)
            at com.sapportals.wdf.layout.VerticalLayout.renderPanes(VerticalLayout.java:74)
            at com.sapportals.wdf.stack.Pane.render(Pane.java:158)
            at com.sapportals.wdf.stack.PaneStack.render(PaneStack.java:67)
            at com.sapportals.wdf.layout.HorizontalLayout.renderPanes(HorizontalLayout.java:73)
            at com.sapportals.wcm.control.layout.HorizontalGroupLayout.renderPanes(HorizontalGroupLayout.java:49)
            at com.sapportals.wdf.stack.Pane.render(Pane.java:158)
            at com.sapportals.wdf.stack.PaneStack.render(PaneStack.java:67)
            at com.sapportals.wdf.WdfCompositeController.internalRender(WdfCompositeController.java:696)
            at com.sapportals.wdf.WdfCompositeController.buildComposition(WdfCompositeController.java:664)
            at com.sapportals.htmlb.AbstractCompositeComponent.preRender(AbstractCompositeComponent.java:33)
            at com.sapportals.htmlb.Container.preRender(Container.java:120)
            at com.sapportals.htmlb.Container.preRender(Container.java:120)
            at com.sapportals.htmlb.Container.preRender(Container.java:120)
            at com.sapportals.portal.htmlb.PrtContext.render(PrtContext.java:414)
            at com.sapportals.htmlb.page.DynPage.doOutput(DynPage.java:237)
            at com.sapportals.wcm.portal.component.base.KMControllerDynPage.doOutput(KMControllerDynPage.java:130)
            at com.sapportals.htmlb.page.PageProcessor.handleRequest(PageProcessor.java:129)
            at com.sapportals.portal.htmlb.page.PageProcessorComponent.doContent(PageProcessorComponent.java:134)
            at com.sapportals.wcm.portal.component.base.ControllerComponent.doContent(ControllerComponent.java:73)
            at com.sapportals.portal.prt.component.AbstractPortalComponent.serviceDeprecated(AbstractPortalComponent.java:209)
            at com.sapportals.portal.prt.component.AbstractPortalComponent.service(AbstractPortalComponent.java:114)
            at com.sapportals.portal.prt.core.PortalRequestManager.callPortalComponent(PortalRequestManager.java:328)
            at com.sapportals.portal.prt.core.PortalRequestManager.dispatchRequest(PortalRequestManager.java:136)
            at com.sapportals.portal.prt.core.PortalRequestManager.dispatchRequest(PortalRequestManager.java:189)
            at com.sapportals.portal.prt.component.PortalComponentResponse.include(PortalComponentResponse.java:215)
            at com.sapportals.portal.prt.pom.PortalNode.service(PortalNode.java:646)
            at com.sapportals.portal.prt.core.PortalRequestManager.callPortalComponent(PortalRequestManager.java:328)
            at com.sapportals.portal.prt.core.PortalRequestManager.dispatchRequest(PortalRequestManager.java:136)
            at com.sapportals.portal.prt.core.PortalRequestManager.dispatchRequest(PortalRequestManager.java:189)
            at com.sapportals.portal.prt.core.PortalRequestManager.runRequestCycle(PortalRequestManager.java:753)
            at com.sapportals.portal.prt.connection.ServletConnection.handleRequest(ServletConnection.java:240)
            at com.sapportals.portal.prt.dispatcher.Dispatcher$doService.run(Dispatcher.java:522)
            at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
            at com.sapportals.portal.prt.dispatcher.Dispatcher.service(Dispatcher.java:405)
            at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:853)
            at com.sap.engine.services.servlets_jsp.server.servlet.InvokerServlet.service(InvokerServlet.java:156)
            at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:853)
            at com.sap.engine.services.servlets_jsp.server.HttpHandlerImpl.runServlet(HttpHandlerImpl.java:390)
            at com.sap.engine.services.servlets_jsp.server.HttpHandlerImpl.handleRequest(HttpHandlerImpl.java:264)
            at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.server.RequestAnalizer.startServlet(RequestAnalizer.java:347)
            at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.server.RequestAnalizer.startServlet(RequestAnalizer.java:325)
            at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.server.RequestAnalizer.invokeWebContainer(RequestAnalizer.java:887)
            at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.server.RequestAnalizer.handle(RequestAnalizer.java:241)
            at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.server.Client.handle(Client.java:92)
            at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.server.Processor.request(Processor.java:148)
            at com.sap.engine.core.service630.context.cluster.session.ApplicationSessionMessageListener.process(ApplicationSessionMessageListener.java:33)
            at com.sap.engine.core.cluster.impl6.session.MessageRunner.run(MessageRunner.java:41)
            at com.sap.engine.core.thread.impl3.ActionObject.run(ActionObject.java:37)
            at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
            at com.sap.engine.core.thread.impl3.SingleThread.execute(SingleThread.java:100)
            at com.sap.engine.core.thread.impl3.SingleThread.run(SingleThread.java:170)
    What could be the reason ?
    Regards
    Deepak Singh

    Patricio ,
       The service permissions are as follows . For testing purposes
    1) Everyone has Full Control
    2) The user with which I have created the repository Manager is the permissions owner
    3) The permissions owner also has full control .
    I am using a file repository manager where the a folder in a windows OS system based machine has been configured to the portal with File repository manager . The access rights on the folder is complete to the user with which I have logged into that file server and the folder is also shared .
    I am at EP6.0 SP15
    Any Clue ?
    Regards
    Deepak Singh

  • Requisition Approval Process in EHP4

    HI,
    In EHP4- E-recruiting, I have given one user the role of Restricted Recruiter. During the requisition creation process, this user should not be allowed to release the Requisition. But this user can release the requisition. It is not asking for the Approver. I hvae already activated the standard workflow for this
    I am currently using the follwoing package- SAPK-60407INERECRUIT.
    Thanks and Regards
    Rosy

    Hi Christine,
    Where can I find out more about what the "workitem" is and where it should be "displayed" to the approver? I'm not sure of what "Interface" the Approver is supposed to Login to, in order to approve the requisition so as to set the requisition's status to "Released".
    I'm using the Restricted Recruiter role that you describe, and I'm able to get the workflow to send an email to the designated approver. However, the default email doesn't mention anything about the "workitem" and the email does not provide a Link so that the approver can complete the Approval process.
    We are using a distributed SAP E-Recruiting sytem and we do not use SAP Portal or MSS. In addition, we have only turned on and activated Business Function "HCM_ERC_CI_1".
    Any help would be greatly appreciated.
    Don

  • Approval Process in Collaboration Room

    Hi Everyone,
         I have created collaboration room using room creation iView under Public Scope.I have assigned three users for this room are Manager, Employee1, Employee2.
    Here, Manager is approver. If Employee1 uploads or creates a file in the room, Manager should approve this file. After getting the approval, Employee2 can view that file. If is it possible ?
    If Possible means, pls give me some idea about that.
    Thanks in Advance
    Prakash..

    HI,
    this should be possible if you maintain the permissions right and set up the approval process the right way.
    Regards,
    Sascha

  • Approval process in XML forms

    Hi,
    I am implementing XML forms with approval process.UI have created a news. and it goes to the folder /documents/news2
    For Folder "News2" I have permission to one USER "Preeti " as approver.Everyone is Read access
    Service Permissions that "Preeti" has Full control.and evryone "Unsubscribe only"I could not see option no service
    Approval process has step of approving from user "Preeti"
    I could now see the edit delete approval in the iview but for the authors and users with system admin role also the iView has option of Submit for approval and Skip approval.
    Also I tried creating new user and for that the NEwsApproval iView does not show the link to create news.as shown in your fig.
    So I want that the author only should see teh link submit approval and not skip approval.All other users even though a system admin but not a approver should not see that Submit approval.
    Please request you to help me.

    Hi Preeti,
                    To see the 'New' link the user should have write access to that folder. Only then they can create xml items using the form.
                    If you dont want to show the skip approval link to any one including admin, you can advance copy the layout set "NewsExplorer" and remove the command from resource command group.
                   The approver also gets the submit for approval option and if he selects it, the document is sent to his own UWL for approval, if he is the only approver, otherwise sent to the next level approver.
    Regards
    Ramesh kotagiri

  • Approval process in update user workflow

    Hi
    I have read in the document Administrative Guide that by default, the approval process is set only for user creation. and the same does not work for update and delete operations on user, unless we customize the code.
    Does any one of you have any idea as to what customization needs to be done for successful approval process for updates also. I have set approvers for resources.
    Thanks
    Bushra

    1. backup the existing Update user workflow as an xml file
    2. Copy paste the same in the BPE.
    3. Save the copy as a new object with a different name.
    4. Edit the new workflow as follows:
    4.1 Create new activity
    4.2 In the new activity, add a variable with some name
    4.3 create a new action, and let that action be a subprocess. For that subprocess, browse and choose 'Approval' as the action.
    4.4 Add a argument as name=approvalForm and value=<name of approval form>
    4.5 Include argument user=$(user), etc. (Check the original approval workflow to see what the names of the arguments are)
    4.6 For return to=name of the variable declared, from=approved
    4.7 Add a 'isTrue' condition for the variable declared.
    5. Make the appropriate transitions, and ur ready to go.
    Let me know if this helps. I can post some skeleton code tomorrow. I need to work on it. Drop a line at [email protected]

  • Approval process in Web page composer

    Hi there,
    We are building static pages using web page composer and trying to implement the KM approval process for those static pages. Now my questions are:
    1. What should be the value I need to give for the folders for service permissions (Layout, collaboration,Full control etc...) for anonymous users
    2. What should be the value I need to give for the folders for service permissions (Layout, collaboration,Full control etc...) for users with approval authorities
    Your help is highly appreciated
    Regards,
    Ponraj M

    Hi,
    The approval process has nothing to do with the service permissions. It's regular permissions you should be concerned about, for example: If a user is a permissions owner of a folder then he will be able to skip the approval process or If a user has only read permissions then he will be able to view only approved documents.
    Best regards,
    Avishai Zamir

Maybe you are looking for

  • Security Deposit - Refund time changed?

    Good afternoon, I just got off the phone with a Verizon representative and I was told my security deposit will not be refunded until next year in January? This is unacceptable, and I want to know who I can call or speak with to get this settled. When

  • Message-driven bean deployment error

    Hi: When attempting to deploy a message-driven bean to the server I get a the following error message:SEVERE: MDB00030: [MessageControllerJAR:MessageControllerEJB]: Exception in setting up message-drive n bean container: [[C4003]: Error occurred on c

  • Can ACFS be installed on My Exadata ?

    Accoring the  article --Can ACFS be installed on Exadata ? (Doc ID 1326938.1) applies to : Oracle Exadata Storage Server Software - Version 11.1.3.1.0 to 11.2.3.1.0 [Release 11.1 to 11.2] Oracle Database - Enterprise Edition - Version 11.2.0.1 to 11.

  • Streaming videos through apple tv

    Since the upgrade to iOs8 I cannot stream videos to my tv through appletv. If they work, it crashes a few seconds into it. Also, the little icon on the bottom right corner of the video where I would choose which device to play the video on (phone, an

  • Rman hangs at exit if locally connected

    hiho, i've a nasty problem. if i connect rman locally 'rman nocatalog target /' it will hang at exit. i tried to connect at rman-prompt with the same result. im using 8.1.6.1.0 on linux. # su - oracle [oracle]$ rman nocatalog Recovery Manager: Releas